Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2020 Dec 4;11(12):1033. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03246-7

When the chains do not break: the role of USP10 in physiology and pathology

Udayan Bhattacharya 1,2,#, Fiifi Neizer-Ashun 3,#, Priyabrata Mukherjee 2,4, Resham Bhattacharya 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC7718870  PMID: 33277473

Abstract

Deubiquitination is now understood to be as important as its partner ubiquitination for the maintenance of protein half-life, activity, and localization under both normal and pathological conditions. The enzymes that remove ubiquitin from target proteins are called deubiquitinases (DUBs) and they regulate a plethora of cellular processes. DUBs are essential enzymes that maintain intracellular protein homeostasis by recycling ubiquitin. Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification where ubiquitin molecules are added to proteins thus influencing activation, localization, and complex formation. Ubiquitin also acts as a tag for protein degradation, especially by proteasomal or lysosomal degradation systems. With ~100 members, DUBs are a large enzyme family; the ubiquitin-specific peptidases (USPs) being the largest group. USP10, an important member of this family, has enormous significance in diverse cellular processes and many human diseases. In this review, we discuss recent studies that define the roles of USP10 in maintaining cellular function, its involvement in human pathologies, and the molecular mechanisms underlying its association with cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. We also discuss efforts to modulate USPs as therapy in these diseases.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Cell signalling

Key points

  • USP10 is a deubiquitinase involved in diverse cellular processes, including ubiquitin recycling, the DNA damage response, stress granule formation, and recycling of cellular proteins.

  • USP10 can act as a tumor suppressor or oncogene in a context-dependent manner.

  • USP10 plays an important role in neurodegenerative and infectious diseases. Therefore, understanding the specific signaling roles of USP10 may have therapeutic potential.

Introduction

Maintaining appropriate protein levels within cells is essential for optimal cellular function and survival1. This intracellular protein homeostasis involves both protein synthesis and degradation. About 90% of intracellular proteins, both normal and abnormal, are degraded by the ubiquitin–proteasome system, the most prominent protein-degradation pathway1,2. Ubiquitination, the covalent attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) to a target protein, is an important post-translational modification regulating the stability and functional activity of proteins. This process is tightly regulated by three groups of enzymes; ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s) that activate ubiquitin using ATP to form Ub adenylate, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) that transfer Ub to ubiquitin ligases (E3s), that tag target proteins with Ub molecules3. Monoubiquitination occurs when a single Ub molecule is attached to one lysine residue within the target protein, while polyubiquitination is the process of attaching a chain of Ub molecules to a specific lysine residue of the target. Usually, monoubiquitination of a protein serves as a signal for vesicle sorting, signal transduction, and receptor endocytosis, whereas polyubiquitination is mainly related to protein degradation47.

Ubiquitination can be reversed by deconjugation reactions mediated by the second group of enzymes—namely, the deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs)8. DUBs cleave Ub from the C-terminus of target proteins and maintain intracellular Ub homeostasis; deubiquitination is necessary to provide a sufficient pool of free Ub molecules within the cell9,10. This deconjugation process and its cellular consequences have not been extensively investigated to date.

Around 100 DUBs have been identified in humans, many of which remain poorly characterized with unknown functions11. Similarly, despite many studies on the role of ubiquitinating enzymes in human disease, there has been limited effort to understand the role of DUBs in disease11,12. DUBs affect multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair, and cell cycle regulation13,14. DUBs also remove Ub molecules from chromatin, more specifically from H2A and H2B, and can regulate gene expression15. Since DUBs play a major role in DNA damage repair, mutations in genes encoding the DUBs ultimately affect cell proliferation and thus are important in tumorigenesis16,17. DUBs also play an important role in infectious diseases; both the host and the pathogen can exploit DUBs to modulate the immune response12,18,19. For example, the host controls inflammatory responses via the cylindromatosis lysine 63 deubiquitinase (CYLD), a DUB responsible for regulating the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway2024. The intracellular pathogen Leishmania donovani, the cause of visceral leishmaniasis, exploits the host DUB A20, an NF-κB-responsive gene, to inhibit Toll-like-receptor 2 (TLR2)-mediated signaling in macrophages19,25,26. Additional reports indicate that DUBs are important in some neurodegenerative diseases27.

DUBs are a large group of enzymes that fall into six distinct subfamilies based on their sequence and functional similarities: (i) ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCH), (ii) ubiquitin-specific peptidases (USP), (iii) Jab1/Pab1/MPN domain-containing metalloenzymes (JAMM), (iv) Otu-domain ubiquitin aldehyde-binding proteins (OTU), (v) Ataxin-3/Josephin, and (vi) monocyte chemotactic protein-induced proteases (MCPIPs). Among these, USPs are the largest family, consisting of over 50 members in humans10. Herein, we focus on a specific USP, namely USP10, and its role in cellular processes and human disease. We also discuss the ongoing development of USP10 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic role.

USP structure and function

In this section, we will discuss the general structure of USPs, including USP10 specifically, as well as the specific protein targets of USP10. Specific USP functions depend on their structural architecture; Komander et al. reported that the USP domain, also called the catalytic domain, present in all USPs is composed of three regions which can be analogized as the fingers, thumb, and palm of a hand28. Structural analyses show that when Ub binds to a USP, the active site undergoes rearrangements that promote the catalytic hydrolysis of Ub from the tagged protein. In addition to the USP domain, Komander et al. identified several predicted Ub-binding domains (UBDs), a Ub-associated domain (UBA domain), a Ub-interacting motif (UIM), and a zinc finger Ub-specific protease domain (ZnF-UBP domain). The catalytic center of USPs is located in the interface between the palm and thumb regions of the USP domain10,28. As previously mentioned, binding of Ub leads to conformational changes in this domain; in the first step, a catalytic triad is formed in a specific alignment. Next, the active-site loop is displaced from its initial position which helps bind the C-terminal end of the target protein. Finally, the unanchored Ub is removed from the target2931. USP7 has been studied in detail and is the archetype of this mechanism of action32. In the case of USP8, the finger domain moves outward to accommodate the globular structure of Ub33. Although the general mode of action is known for the USPs, the crystal structures and a detailed characterization for most of the family remain unknown. The current model for the mechanism of action is dependent on the crystal structure of USPs 7, 8, and 5; these represent a relatively small sample from a large number of enzymes in the group. Many other USPs remain to be thoroughly characterized and such studies may further refine the mechanistic model and add interesting modifications to the process.

Human USP10 is 798 amino acids (aa) in length and is expressed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of almost every cell. USP10 is evolutionarily conserved, and human USP10 has ~99% amino acid sequence homology with the rat and mouse proteins. The USP domain or catalytic domain (also called the core region) of USP10 is about 380-aa long and begins 415 aa from the N-terminus (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Schematic of USP10 structure.

Fig. 1

USP10 is a 798 amino acid long protein. It contains a catalytic core domain (also known as USP Domain).

Functionally, USP10 is a cysteine protease—it mediates the thiol-dependent hydrolysis of ester, thioester, amide, and/or peptide bonds formed by the carboxy-terminal glycine residue of Ub. By this hydrolysis reaction, Ub moieties are removed from the targeted proteins. The most important targets of USP10 include tumor protein p53 (TP53)34, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)35, AMP-activated protein kinase alpha (AMPKα)36, Sirtuin 6 (SIRT6)37, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-essential modulator (NEMO)38, all of which are involved in significant cellular processes thus explaining the central role of USP10 in cellular metabolism, signaling and tumorigenesis. USP10 also regulates autophagy by deubiquitinating Beclin1 (BECN1)39,40. Two proteins that are related to each other, i.e., Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 (G3BP1) and G3BP2, bind USP10 and regulate stress granule formation in cells41. Other studies have shown that USP10 promotes tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) deubiquitination by forming a complex with TRAF family member-associated NF-κB activator (TANK) and MCPIP1 (monocyte chemotactic protein-1-induced protein 1; also known as ZC3H12A, this complex inhibits genotoxic stress- or interleukin-1-beta (IL1β)-mediated NF-κB activation42. The detailed functional role of USP10 and its mechanism of action, in the context of disease pathology, are discussed in the following sections.

The USP10 homolog in yeast

USP10 is a highly conserved protein in eukaryotes, as well as being found in some lower organisms. In yeast, the USP10 homolog is UBP3, which plays a vital role in the DNA repair mechanism. The Rad4–Rad23 heterodimer is responsible for recognizing DNA damage in yeast; disruption of UBP3 results in enhanced UV resistance, increased repair of UV damage, increased Rad4 levels in Rad23 deleted cells and higher Rad4 stability. UBP3 also physically interacts with Rad4 and the proteasome, suggesting that UBP3 associates with the proteasome to assist Rad4 degradation43.

A second important role of UBP3 is to recycle ribosomal subunits from translational blockage. When a ribosome complex stalls during translation elongation in eukaryotes, Hel2p E3 ligase monoubiquitinates the ribosomal protein S3 (RPS3)44; RPS3 ubiquitination is critical for ribosome quality control45. RPS3 monoubiquitination is regulated by the reciprocal action between Hel2p and UBP344. In mammalian cells, the reciprocal action between RNF123 E3 ligase and USP10 has an analogous role44.

USP10 in cellular processes of humans

USP10 has multiple functions under normal conditions in mammalian cells. In this section, we focus on the critical cellular processes in humans that are influenced by USP10.

USP10 as controller of the androgen receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a type of nuclear receptor activated by binding androgenic hormones, and it is critical for the development of male characteristics. In humans, several conditions are associated with AR, including androgen insensitivity syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer. Prostate development and normal prostate function are dependent on the AR signaling pathway. Thus, the AR and its modulators are considered significant factors in the progression of prostate cancer and could be potential therapeutic targets. Recent studies indicate that USP10 plays a role in modulating AR activity. USP10 deubiquitinates AR in the cytosol and enhances nuclear import and transcriptional activity of AR46. Overexpression of wild-type but not inactive USP10 was found to stimulate the AR activity from reporter constructs harboring selective androgen response elements, non-selective steroid response elements, or the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. USP10 is therefore a cofactor that binds to the AR and stimulates the androgen response of target promoters46. Moreover, USP10 directly deubiquitinates H2A.Z, a variant of histone 2A (H2A) and both are necessary for AR-mediated gene expression47. In both hormone-sensitive and hormone-refractory prostate cancers, AR expression is observed4850, and overexpression of AR is frequently observed in advanced prostate cancer5155. Concurrently, USP10 overexpression is also observed in advanced prostate cancer patients and overexpression correlates with poor patient outcomes56. These findings identify USP10 as a critical intermediate in prostate cancer and various other clinical conditions where AR is compromised.

USP10 in DNA damage response

The DNA damage response (DDR) protects cells against threatening mutations that arise from DNA damage. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that USPs regulate the action and stability of DDR proteins and their modulators. One well-characterized USP, specifically USP7, modulates/suppresses oxidative stress or UV-induced proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) ubiquitination thereby regulating DNA polymerase eta stability57,58. Additionally, USP7 is essential for regulating Rad18 stability and DNA damage tolerance59. USP7 regulates cellular p53 levels by deubiquitinating and stabilizing p53 or by deubiquitinating and stabilizing MDM2, a negative regulator of p5360,61. The role of USP10 in DDR was recently described; specifically, USP10 was identified as a regulator of p53; under unstressed conditions, USP10 deubiquitinates p53 in the cytoplasm thus countering the action of MDM2 and enabling nuclear re-entry (Fig. 2A). However, upon DNA damage, USP10 accumulates in the nucleus, is phosphorylated by ATM, and deubiquitinates p53 in the nucleus (Fig. 2B). In this context, the dual action of USP10 and USP7 may be critical for maintaining p53 stability upon DNA damage. Unlike USP7, USP10 does not target MDM234 and since it stabilizes both wild-type and mutant p53, the therapeutic potential of USP10 may be relevant in specific malignancies.

Fig. 2. Role of USP10 in p53 stabilization.

Fig. 2

A Under unstressed conditions, cytoplasmic USP10 deubiquitinates p53 to prevent proteasomal degradation of p53 and allow nuclear re-entry. B After genotoxic stress, p53 is phosphorylated by ATM to reduce its interaction with MDM2. MDM2 gets phosphorylated by ATM making it susceptible for degradation. USP10 accumulates in the nucleus, undergoes ATM-mediated phosphorylation, and stabilizes p53 in the nucleus via deubiquitination.

USP10 in energy sensing and autophagy

The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important regulator of metabolic homeostasis. AMPK senses the cellular energy state; upon energy stress, ubiquitinated AMPK is partially activated by AMP or ADP binding and phosphorylation within the activation loop of its kinase domain. Partially activated AMPK phosphorylates USP10 at Ser76, enhancing USP10 activity to mediate AMPKα deubiquitination. The activity of USP10 facilitates phosphorylation of AMPKα at Thr172 by LKB1. This feedforward loop ensures that AMPK activation is amplified in response to energy stress36 (Fig. 3). The role of AMPK in promoting autophagy is well established62,63, and the impact of USP10 on AMPK activity and the feedforward loop suggests a potential role of USP10 in modulating autophagy. Interestingly, USP10 also regulates Beclin140, a key promoter of autophagy64. USP10-mediated deubiquitination of Beclin1 protects against degradation thus promoting autophagy40. Strikingly, depletion of Beclin1 reduces both USP13 and USP10 levels40, suggesting the presence of a regulatory feedback loop. Although the interaction of USP10 with Beclin1 is transient, the interaction of Beclin1 with USP13 is robust therefore Beclin1 through USP13, a DUB that deubiquitinates USP1040 can modulate USP10 levels. Notably, there is an intricate reciprocal regulation of autophagic factors and their cognate DUBS. USP10 may therefore be integral in human pathologies associated with deregulation of autophagy. Together with established roles of AMPK activation in alleviating obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndromes, neurological disorders, and cancer63,65, USP10 may be attractively pertinent in these pathologies.

Fig. 3. Role of USP10 in AMPK phosphorylation and activation.

Fig. 3

Under unstressed conditions, AMPKα remains ubiquitylated; ubiquitination of AMPK inhibits its phosphorylation and activation. Upon cellular stress, AMP/ADP binding to AMPKg leads to partial activation of AMPK and phosphorylation of USP10. Deubiquitination of AMPK by USP10 contributes to AMPK phosphorylation and activation by LKB1. Parallelly, activated AMPK phosphorylates USP10 thus enhancing its activity under stress thus amplifying AMPK activation.

USP10 in NOTCH signaling

Notch signaling is important for determining the sprouting behavior of endothelial cells (EC) in vascular morphogenesis. USP10 regulates Notch signaling during angiogenic spouting by interacting with and by stabilizing the NOTCH1 intracellular domain (NICD1) in ECs66. Studies in mice retina, a well-established model of Notch-dependent angiogenesis, revealed that deletion of USP10 in ECs increased EC density and sprouting; recapitulating phenotypes of reduced Notch signaling. Overexpression of NICD1 resulted in retinal vascular defects that were partially restored by USP10 inhibition66. These findings suggest that USP10 regulates Notch-dependent vascular morphogenesis. Retinal development and vascular homeostasis is largely controlled by Notch signaling67, deregulation of which can lead to retinal dysplasia and neovascularization-associated diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy67,68 and age-related macular degeneration67. Therefore, eye-related pathologies like diabetic retinopathy that are characterized by upregulated Notch signaling68 may benefit from USP10 targeting.

USP10 in ribosome recycling and stress granule formation

The USP10-G3BP1 complex is important for deubiquitinating ribosomal proteins (RPS2, RPS3, and RPS10) and disassembly of stalled/collided ribosomes. The action of USP10 prevents lysosomal degradation of 40S subunits and ensures recycling of ribosomal subunits44,69. Although USP10 may not be required for initial ribosome quality control (RQC) function69, it may be essential for detachment of ribosomes from mRNA, and splitting, or turnover of ribosomal subunits in the event of ribosome stalling. Ribosome recycling is essential for the viability of cells70, malfunctioning of recycling is associated with a mistranslation of proteins within cellular compartments and can cause unfolded protein responses, leading to autophagy—especially relevant in aging71. Presently, it is unclear if the USP10 function is absolutely essential or can be compensated by other DUBs that facilitate the recycling of ribosomal subunits. If essential, then targeting USP10 may show some adverse effects. However, transient or moderate downregulation may promote an unfolded protein response that can lead to cell death which may be useful in specific malignancies where it is upregulated. Stress granules are assemblies of untranslated messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs). They contain stalled translation preinitiation complexes that are assembled into discrete granules by specific RNA-binding proteins i.e, G3BP. USP10 binds G3BP proteins and thus can minimize stress-related damage and promote cell survival72. This mechanism is important in neurodegenerative diseases and Tau pathology which is discussed in more detail below.

USP10 in hematopoiesis

USP10 is crucial for hematopoiesis; in a study in mice, all USP10 knockout mice died within 1 year due to bone marrow failure with pancytopenia i.e., deficiency of all three cellular components—red cells, white cells, and platelets. Bone marrow failure in these mice was associated with remarkable reductions of long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) in the bone marrow and liver73.

Thus, USP10 is involved in diverse cellular functions, and its involvement in multiple human pathologies is not surprising; USP10-associated pathologies include cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. In the following sections, we will address the role of USP10 in various disease states.

USP10 and cancer

USP10 has crucial functions in tumorigenesis; it controls cell viability, differentiation, and apoptosis. USP10 is overexpressed in multiple malignancies including certain breast cancers and glioblastoma, while it is under-expressed in other malignancies including gastric carcinoma, and colon and lung cancers, suggesting that the role of USP10 in cancer is context-dependent. Below we elaborate the context-dependent roles of USP10 in cancer.

USP10 as tumor suppressor

To understand the role of USP10 in colon cancer Lin et al. took a proteomic approach and identified USP10 as a SIRT6-interacting protein. USP10 suppressed SIRT6 ubiquitination thus protecting it from proteasomal degradation37. Mechanistically, USP10 antagonized the transcriptional activation of the c-Myc oncogene through SIRT6, as well as TP53, to inhibit cell cycle progression, cancer cell growth, and tumor formation (Fig. 4). Additionally, human colon cancer tissues had reduced levels of both USP10 and SIRT6 compared to adjacent normal tissue37, suggesting a role of USP10 as a tumor suppressor.

Fig. 4. Role of USP10 in regulating various cellular functions.

Fig. 4

USP10 interacts with and deubiquitinates various proteins, including SIRT6, NEMO, TRAF, and BECN1. The activity of USP10 towards these targets mediates various cellular functions.

Zeng et al. assessed USP10 expression levels in gastric carcinoma (GC). USP10 expression was lower in GC cells than in immortalized gastric epithelial cells. In a patient population USP10 expression negatively correlated with gastric wall invasion (P = 0.009), nodal metastasis (P = 0.002), and TNM stage (P = 0.0001), and expression of USP10 was lower in GC tissues than in non-cancerous mucosae (P < 0.05). Finally, poor prognosis in GC patients was associated with negative USP10 expression thus suggesting USP10 may have prognostic significance in GC74.

Sun et al. used co-immunoprecipitation to demonstrate an interaction between USP10 and the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) protein; they concluded that USP10 inhibits lung cancer cell growth and invasion by upregulating PTEN75. Similarly, Zhang et al. revealed that USP10 interacts with and stabilizes MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2) in lung cancer cells. MSH2 levels positively correlated with USP10 levels in lung cancer cell lines. The USP10-MSH2 pathway regulates the DNA damage response76; knockdown of USP10 in lung cancer cells increased cell survival and decreased apoptosis following treatment with DNA-damaging agents. In an analysis of 148 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (101 men and 47 women; age range, 40–76 years; mean age, 60.0 ± 8.2 years), there was no correlation between USP10 mRNA expression and clinicopathologic features, including age, sex, tumor size, TNM stage, and tumor cell differentiation. However, USP10 protein expression was downregulated in clinical NSCLC tissue samples compared with non-cancerous lung tissues77.

USP10 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) growth in vivo by inhibiting the mTOR signaling pathway. Additionally, USP10 is significantly downregulated and associated with poor prognosis in HCC. Mechanistically, USP10 stabilizes PTEN and AMPKα by inhibiting polyubiquitination of these proteins in HCC which leads to inhibition of AKT and mTOR activation78.

Han et al. showed that loss of USP10 (and p14ARF) expression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer; USP10 knockdown in ovarian cancer cells led to increased proliferation and clonogenicity79. In patients with small intestinal adenocarcinoma, loss of USP10 and p14ARF is associated with poor prognosis. In 195 surgically resected small intestinal adenocarcinoma tumors, USP10 expression was significantly decreased compared to normal tissue. Loss of USP10 was seen in 124 out of 194 (63.9%) small intestinal adenocarcinoma samples and correlated with a higher pT stage (P = 0.044), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.033), and the absence of sporadic adenoma (P = 0.024) and peritumoral dysplasia (P = 0.019), suggesting that loss of USP10 and p14ARF can be used as prognostic markers in small intestinal adenocarcinoma80. More recently, Kim et al. observed USP10 and p14ARF protein expression by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray from 280 colorectal cancer cases. USP10 expression was lost in 18.6% of samples, and this was linked to lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.019) and distant metastases (P < 0.001). Decreased expression of USP10 correlates with unfavorable prognosis in colorectal cancer81.

The preceding studies show that USP10 can act as a tumor suppressor via specific cellular mechanisms. However, in other cancers, the effect is very different and is discussed in the following section.

USP10 as oncogene

In 2006, Grunda et al. first showed that increased expression of USP10, along with survivin and thymidylate synthetase, is associated with poor survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)82. They used a novel real-time quantitative low-density array approach to identify differentially expressed genes in GBM patient tissues and concluded that USP10 expression can be leveraged as a prognostic indicator in GBM.

High expression of USP10 is also significantly associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients. The effect of USP10 in prostate cancer is via its modulation of the p53-G3BP2 complex and androgen receptor signaling; USP10 associates with and increases the stability of G3BP2 by reducing polyubiquitination. Increased levels of G3BP2 inhibit p53 activity56 leading to uncontrolled proliferation.

In breast cancer cells, USP10 has been identified as a critical regulator of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. USP10 was also identified in complex with the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and PTEN proteins. Functionally, USP10 stabilizes ITCH, which is an E3 ligase for MEK1; this results in degradation of MEK1 and decreased PTEN plasma membrane localization. Downregulation of USP10 decreased activation of AKT, causing decreased colony formation83. Additionally, USP10 is overexpressed in breast cancer, and overexpression correlates with tumor progression and poor overall patient survival38.

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), ~30% of patients harbor mutations in Fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) which usually results in internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD)—thus allowing AML cells to proliferate84. Expression of mutant FLT3-ITD in AML patients correlates with poor prognosis and decreased survival. USP10 selectively deubiquitinates and stabilizes the mutant FLT3-ITD resulting in the accumulation of FLT3-ITD promoting oncogenic function84.

Thus, USP10 can act as both tumor suppressor and oncogene, depending on the type of cancer. The role of USP10 is not only relevant in cancer but it also has prominent roles in neurodegenerative disease, cystic fibrosis, and some infectious disease.

USP10 in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is caused by Tau aggregation in neurons. The protein TIA1 initiates Tau aggregation by inducing the formation of stress granules. Stress granule formation is prevalent in the initial stages of several neurodegenerative diseases including AD and Parkinson’s disease. Piatnitskaia et al. showed that USP10 participates in Tau aggregation in neuronal cells exposed to stress. Exposing HT22 neuronal cells to stress resulted in the formation of TIA1/Tau-positive stress granules that were severely attenuated by depletion of USP10. In this study, USP10 colocalized with Tau aggregates in the “cell body” of neurons in AD brain lesions suggesting that USP10 is important for stress granule formation in Tau pathology85.

Accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins is cytotoxic, especially for neurons, and can lead to apoptosis and autophagy. Generally, neurons overcome the cytotoxicity of ubiquitinated proteins by “aggresome” formation. Aggresomes refer to an assemblage of aggregated or misfolded proteins that occur when the cell’s degradation system is overwhelmed. Takashaki et al. found that USP10 inhibits ubiquitinated protein-induced apoptosis by inducing aggresome formation; USP10 interacted with p62 and this interaction augmented p62-dependent ubiquitinated protein aggregation and aggresome formation, thereby inhibiting apoptosis. USP10 induced the formation of aggresomes containing α-synuclein, a pathogenic protein in Parkinson’s disease, in cultured cells. In Parkinson’s disease brains, USP10 colocalized with α-synuclein in the disease-linked aggresome-like inclusion-bodies called Lewy bodies, suggesting that USP10 limits α-synuclein-induced neurotoxicity by promoting Lewy body formation86. Collectively, these findings suggest that USP10 is a critical factor to control protein aggregation, aggresome formation, and cytotoxicity in neurodegenerative diseases.

USP10 in cystic fibrosis and lung infection

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a membrane protein that functions as a chloride channel and helps to maintain the balance of water and salt on the surface of the lung (and on other body surfaces) thereby helping in mucociliary clearance and elimination of pathogens from the lung35. When CFTR function is compromised, chloride is trapped in cells and the cellular surface becomes dehydrated. This results in the thick and sticky surface mucus that characterizes cystic fibrosis. The amount of CFTR on the cell surface is determined by ubiquitination-dependent CFTR endocytosis and deubiquitination-dependent recycling of CFTR to the plasma membrane of human airway epithelial cells35. Recently, a novel role of USP10 has been described in mediating CFTR deubiquitination in early endosomes thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR35. USP10 directly interacts with and deubiquitinates CFTR resulting in increased cell surface expression of CFTR. In lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative bacterium, Cif, a toxin produced by the bacterium, reduces CFTR-mediated chloride secretion by epithelial cells. Cif regulates CFTR deubiquitination in endosomes by inhibition of USP1087. Cif stabilizes G3BP1-mediated inhibition of USP10, which then reduces USP10-mediated deubiquitination of CFTR and increases degradation of CFTR (Fig. 5). USP10 may also be targeted by other pathogens that similarly regulate CFTR and mucociliary clearance leading to compromised immunity of the lung35. Expression of USP10 in human airway epithelial cells is therefore protective for CFTR abundance and chloride secretion, which is beneficial to patients with pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis. Vasopressin has been shown to upregulate USP10 expression in kidney cortical collecting duct cells and increases the surface expression of epithelial Na+ channels through deubiquitination and stabilization of sorting nexin3 by USP1088. Vasopressin can also stimulate CFTR-mediated chloride secretion89,90, possibly via USP10 upregulation. Therefore, USP10 expression may be advantageous in cystic fibrosis patients to promote CFTR recycling to the epithelial surface. Additionally, a better understanding of the role of USP10 in the endocytic trafficking of CFTR and other ion channels has the potential to identify new targets for drug development in multiple diseases, including cystic fibrosis.

Fig. 5. Role of USP10 on CFTR expression on the epithelial surface.

Fig. 5

Under healthy conditions, CFTR is multi-ubiquitinated and endocytosed. USP10 mediates the deubiquitination of CFTR in the endosome; preventing lysosomal degradation of CFTR and facilitating recycling to the epithelial surface. Under the pathological conditions, Cif toxin stabilizes the inhibitory effect of G3BP1 on USP10 and inhibits the recycling of the CFTR leading to reduced CFTR abundance and chloride secretion.

We have discussed the importance of USP10 in different cancers, in AD, Parkinson’s disease, and cystic fibrosis. In the following section, the therapeutic potential of DUB inhibitors, especially inhibitors of USP10, will be discussed in a cancer-specific context.

Therapeutic potential of DUB inhibitors

DUBs are now considered excellent targets for drug development91. Many viral and bacterial DUBs have been identified in the last two decades and shown to be involved in the initiation and progression of the infection. Modulation of host DUBs by pathogenic agents is also well-characterized88. Based on the rapid developments in this field, the design of DUB inhibitors to treat infections is ongoing19.

Abnormal function and/or regulation of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) is associated with multiple malignancies. The FDA has already approved the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade®) for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma92,93. DUBs are an important class of molecules that regulate the UPS, as such DUB inhibitors are currently being assessed as anticancer drugs94,95. In the last few decades, many small molecules that specifically target DUBs have been developed and clinically tested. USPs are a highly specialized and important class of DUBs with emerging therapeutic potential, especially in cancer. Although the USP family as a whole remains largely unexplored, select USPs and their inhibitors have been the focus of recent research. For example, P5091 is a USP7-specific inhibitor that induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells resistant to conventional and bortezomib therapies through stabilization of TP5396. Pimozide and ML323, both USP1/UAF1 (USP1-associated factor 1) inhibitors, have been tested in NSCLC and osteosarcoma cells97,98. Pimozide sensitizes cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells and enhances cytotoxicity of cisplatin97. Pimozide also targets STAT599, thus, its therapeutic effect may be independent of USP targeting or, its ability to dually target STAT5 and USP1/UAF1 may be central to its potency. Further studies are required to elucidate distinct mechanisms. Another molecule EOAI3402143, a USP5/USP9x inhibitor was recently shown to induce p53-dependent FAS expression, reverse vemurafenib resistance, and decrease melanoma growth100. The small molecule WP1130 selectively inhibits a variety of DUBs and upregulates proapoptotic protein levels101. Although it was initially identified in Janus-activated kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway inhibitors cell-based screens, WP1130 does not inhibit JAK2 kinase activity but rather inhibits the activity of DUB enzyme101. It is still unclear how WP1130 impacts DUB activity and all of the DUBS affected by WP1140 have not been identified.

Spautin-1 is a promising inhibitor of USP10, and it inhibits autophagy by targeting Beclin140. Inhibition of autophagy by spautin-1 enhances imatinib mesylate (IM) induced apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia102; IM is a targeted competitive inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. The proapoptotic activity of spautin-1 is also associated with the activation of GSK-3β102. In canine appendicular osteosarcoma cells, spautin-1, either alone or combined with doxorubicin, decreases cell survival and colony formation103. Spautin-1-treated ovarian cancer cells also show decreased survival104. In prostate cancer, spautin-1 can inhibit EGFR signaling and induce cell death, although this effect is independent of USP10105. A recent study showed the potential of spautin-1 in suppressing melanoma growth by inducing reactive oxygen species-mediated DNA damage106. Another study by Weisberg et al. showed that two other molecules, P22077 and HBX19818 also inhibit the deubiquitinase activity of USP10 thereby promoting degradation of FLT3-ITD in cancer cells84. Together, these reports indicate that USP10 inhibition has significant potential in cancer therapy.

Conclusion

It is well established that the addition and removal of Ub from target proteins are essential for normal cellular functions. Rapid advances in the field demonstrate the importance of DUBs in this process. Although the biology of USP10 is not fully characterized, our current knowledge of how USP10 maintains cellular function is expanding. USP10 is an important DUB, it is primarily a cysteine protease, with complex behavior and regulates multiple aspects of cellular function in both normal and pathological conditions. We have detailed the role of USP10 in multiple disease states and explained how USP10 modulation may be beneficial in these diseases. Current developments of small molecule inhibitors for a number of USPs provide scope for targeting USP10 for therapeutic purposes. Although we have attempted to create a complete portrait of USP10 functions in relation to human pathophysiology, basic research of the molecular mechanisms underlying USP10 functions and its distinct roles in physiological and pathological regulations will be instrumental in the characterization of USP10 as therapy.

Acknowledgements

The study was partly supported by a Department of Defense award W81XWH1810054 to RB. The preparation of this publication was also supported in part by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA225520 and the Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust contract awarded to the University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center and used the services of the Proposal Services Core in the Office of Cancer Research. We thank the reviewer for thoughtful suggestions and criticisms.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Edited by A. Peschiaroli

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Udayan Bhattacharya, Fiifi Neizer-Ashun

References

  • 1.Amm I, Sommer T, Wolf DH. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2014;1843:182–196. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dikic I. Proteasomal and autophagic degradation systems. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:193–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scheffner M, Nuber U, Huibregtse JM. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature. 1995;373:81–83. doi: 10.1038/373081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012;81:203–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ramanathan HN, Ye Y. Cellular strategies for making monoubiquitin signals. Crit. Rev. Biochem Mol. Biol. 2012;47:17–28. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.620943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadowski M, Suryadinata R, Tan AR, Roesley SN, Sarcevic B. Protein monoubiquitination and polyubiquitination generate structural diversity to control distinct biological processes. IUBMB Life. 2012;64:136–142. doi: 10.1002/iub.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun L, Chen ZJ. The novel functions of ubiquitination in signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004;16:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2004;1695:189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park CW, Ryu KY. Cellular ubiquitin pool dynamics and homeostasis. BMB Rep. 2014;47:475–482. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.9.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009;78:363–397. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mevissen TET, Komander D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:159–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.He M, et al. The emerging role of deubiquitinating enzymes in genomic integrity, diseases, and therapeutics. Cell Biosci. 2016;6:62. doi: 10.1186/s13578-016-0127-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kee Y, Huang TT. Role of deubiquitinating enzymes in DNA repair. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;36:524–544. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00847-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mapa CE, Arsenault HE, Conti MM, Poti KE, Benanti JA. A balance of deubiquitinating enzymes controls cell cycle entry. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2018;29:2821–2834. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-07-0425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Atanassov BS, Koutelou E, Dent SY. The role of deubiquitinating enzymes in chromatin regulation. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:2016–2023. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hussain S, Zhang Y, Galardy PJ. DUBs and cancer: the role of deubiquitinating enzymes as oncogenes, non-oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1688–1697. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.11.8739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiao Z, Zhang P, Ma L. The role of deubiquitinases in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9640-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li Y, et al. The role of deubiquitinases in oncovirus and host interactions. J. Oncol. 2019;2019:2128410. doi: 10.1155/2019/2128410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nanduri B, Suvarnapunya AE, Venkatesan M, Edelmann MJ. Deubiquitinating enzymes as promising drug targets for infectious diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013;19:3234–3247. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319180008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harhaj EW, Dixit VM. Regulation of NF-kappaB by deubiquitinases. Immunol. Rev. 2012;246:107–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harhaj EW, Dixit VM. Deubiquitinases in the regulation of NF-kappaB signaling. Cell Res. 2011;21:22–39. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adhikari A, Xu M, Chen ZJ. Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK. Oncogene. 2007;26:3214–3226. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kovalenko A, et al. The tumour suppressor CYLD negatively regulates NF-kappaB signalling by deubiquitination. Nature. 2003;424:801–805. doi: 10.1038/nature01802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trompouki E, et al. CYLD is a deubiquitinating enzyme that negatively regulates NF-kappaB activation by TNFR family members. Nature. 2003;424:793–796. doi: 10.1038/nature01803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wertz IE, et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature. 2004;430:694–699. doi: 10.1038/nature02794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coornaert B, Carpentier I, Beyaert R. A20: central gatekeeper in inflammation and immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:8217–8221. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800032200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Das S, Ramakrishna S, Kim KS. Critical roles of deubiquitinating enzymes in the nervous system and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Cells. 2020;43:203–214. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2020.2289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Komander D, Clague MJ, Urbe S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:550–563. doi: 10.1038/nrm2731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Love KR, Catic A, Schlieker C, Ploegh HL. Mechanisms, biology and inhibitors of deubiquitinating enzymes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:697–705. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hu M, et al. Crystal structure of a UBP-family deubiquitinating enzyme in isolation and in complex with ubiquitin aldehyde. Cell. 2002;111:1041–1054. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ye Y, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Komander D. Dissection of USP catalytic domains reveals five common insertion points. Mol. Biosyst. 2009;5:1797–1808. doi: 10.1039/b907669g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Z, et al. USP7: novel drug target in cancer therapy. Front Pharm. 2019;10:427. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Avvakumov GV, et al. Amino-terminal dimerization, NRDP1-rhodanese interaction, and inhibited catalytic domain conformation of the ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:38061–38070. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606704200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yuan J, Luo K, Zhang L, Cheville JC, Lou Z. USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53. Cell. 2010;140:384–396. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bomberger JM, Barnaby RL, Stanton BA. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 regulates the post-endocytic sorting of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in airway epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:18778–18789. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.001685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deng M, et al. Deubiquitination and activation of AMPK by USP10. Mol. Cell. 2016;61:614–624. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lin Z, et al. USP10 antagonizes c-Myc transcriptional activation through SIRT6 stabilization to suppress tumor formation. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1639–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Niu J, et al. USP10 inhibits genotoxic NF-kappaB activation by MCPIP1-facilitated deubiquitination of NEMO. EMBO J. 2013;32:3206–3219. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boutouja, F., Brinkmeier, R., Mastalski, T., El Magraoui, F. & Platta, H. W. Regulation of the tumor-suppressor BECLIN 1 by distinct ubiquitination cascades. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 10.3390/ijms18122541 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Liu J, et al. Beclin1 controls the levels of p53 by regulating the deubiquitination activity of USP10 and USP13. Cell. 2011;147:223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Soncini C, Berdo I, Draetta G. Ras-GAP SH3 domain binding protein (G3BP) is a modulator of USP10, a novel human ubiquitin specific protease. Oncogene. 2001;20:3869–3879. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang W, et al. TRAF family member-associated NF-kappaB activator (TANK) inhibits genotoxic nuclear factor kappaB activation by facilitating deubiquitinase USP10-dependent deubiquitination of TRAF6 ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:13372–13385. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.643767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mao P, Smerdon MJ. Yeast deubiquitinase Ubp3 interacts with the 26 S proteasome to facilitate Rad4 degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:37542–37550. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.170175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jung Y, et al. Modulating cellular balance of Rps3 mono-ubiquitination by both Hel2 E3 ligase and Ubp3 deubiquitinase regulates protein quality control. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017;49:e390. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Higgins R, et al. The unfolded protein response triggers site-specific regulatory ubiquitylation of 40S ribosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Faus H, Meyer HA, Huber M, Bahr I, Haendler B. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP10 modulates androgen receptor function. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2005;245:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Draker R, Sarcinella E, Cheung P. USP10 deubiquitylates the histone variant H2A.Z and both are required for androgen receptor-mediated gene activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:3529–3542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chodak GW, et al. Nuclear localization of androgen receptor in heterogeneous samples of normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human prostate. J. Urol. 1992;147:798–803. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ruizeveld de Winter JA, et al. Androgen receptor status in localized and locally progressive hormone refractory human prostate cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 1994;144:735–746. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sadi MV, Walsh PC, Barrack ER. Immunohistochemical study of androgen receptors in metastatic prostate cancer. Comparison of receptor content and response to hormonal therapy. Cancer. 1991;67:3057–3064. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910615)67:12&#x0003c;3057::AID-CNCR2820671221&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen CD, et al. Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat. Med. 2004;10:33–39. doi: 10.1038/nm972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Feldman BJ, Feldman D. The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2001;1:34–45. doi: 10.1038/35094009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Takayama K, Inoue S. Transcriptional network of androgen receptor in prostate cancer progression. Int. J. Urol. 2013;20:756–768. doi: 10.1111/iju.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang Q, et al. A hierarchical network of transcription factors governs androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer growth. Mol. Cell. 2007;27:380–392. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang Q, et al. Androgen receptor regulates a distinct transcription program in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Cell. 2009;138:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Takayama KI, Suzuki T, Fujimura T, Takahashi S, Inoue S. Association of USP10 with G3BP2 inhibits p53 signaling and contributes to poor outcome in prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018;16:846–856. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kashiwaba S, et al. USP7 is a suppressor of PCNA ubiquitination and oxidative-stress-induced mutagenesis in human cells. Cell Rep. 2015;13:2072–2080. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Qian J, et al. USP7 modulates UV-induced PCNA monoubiquitination by regulating DNA polymerase eta stability. Oncogene. 2015;34:4791–4796. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zlatanou A, et al. USP7 is essential for maintaining Rad18 stability and DNA damage tolerance. Oncogene. 2016;35:965–976. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Qi SM, et al. Targeting USP7-mediated deubiquitination of MDM2/MDMX-p53 pathway for cancer therapy: are we there yet? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:233. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tavana O, Gu W. Modulation of the p53/MDM2 interplay by HAUSP inhibitors. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;9:45–52. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjw049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:132–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ. The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1016–1023. doi: 10.1038/ncb2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:571–580. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Steinberg GR, Kemp BE. AMPK in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2009;89:1025–1078. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lim R, et al. Deubiquitinase USP10 regulates Notch signaling in the endothelium. Science. 2019;364:188–193. doi: 10.1126/science.aat0778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zheng M, Zhang Z, Zhao X, Ding Y, Han H. The Notch signaling pathway in retinal dysplasia and retina vascular homeostasis. J. Genet. Genomics. 2010;37:573–582. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60077-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Miloudi K, et al. NOTCH1 signaling induces pathological vascular permeability in diabetic retinopathy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:4538–4547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814711116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Meyer C, Garzia A, Morozov P, Molina H, Tuschl T. The G3BP1-family-USP10 deubiquitinase complex rescues ubiquitinated 40S subunits of ribosomes stalled in translation from lysosomal degradation. Mol. Cell. 2020;77:1193–1205 e1195. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kiel MC, Kaji H, Kaji A. Ribosome recycling: an essential process of protein synthesis. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2007;35:40–44. doi: 10.1002/bmb.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kirstein-Miles J, Scior A, Deuerling E, Morimoto RI. The nascent polypeptide-associated complex is a key regulator of proteostasis. EMBO J. 2013;32:1451–1468. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kedersha N, et al. G3BP-Caprin1-USP10 complexes mediate stress granule condensation and associate with 40S subunits. J. Cell Biol. 2016;212:845–860. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201508028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Higuchi M, et al. USP10 is an essential deubiquitinase for hematopoiesis and inhibits apoptosis of long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7:1116–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zeng Z, et al. Prognostic significance of USP10 as a tumor-associated marker in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3845–3853. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1509-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sun J, et al. USP10 inhibits lung cancer cell growth and invasion by upregulating PTEN. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2018;441:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11010-017-3170-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang M, et al. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 (USP10) deubiquitinates and stabilizes MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) to regulate cellular sensitivity to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:10783–10791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.700047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zeng Z, et al. Association and clinical implication of the USP10 and MSH2 proteins in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:1128–1138. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lu C, et al. USP10 suppresses tumor progression by inhibiting mTOR activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2018;436:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Han GH, et al. Loss of both USP10 and p14ARF protein expression is an independent prognostic biomarker for poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteom. 2019;16:553–562. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Song JS, et al. Dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF protein expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with small intestinal adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2018;40:1–13. doi: 10.1177/1010428318808678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kim K, et al. Prognostic significance of USP10 and p14ARF expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Pathol. Res. Pr. 2020;216:152988. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.152988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Grunda JM, et al. Increased expression of thymidylate synthetase (TS), ubiquitin specific protease 10 (USP10) and survivin is associated with poor survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) J. Neurooncol. 2006;80:261–274. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kumari N, et al. Identifying the oncogenic role of USP10 as the regulator of PTEN function in breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:iii10–iii11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy047.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Weisberg EL, et al. Inhibition of USP10 induces degradation of oncogenic FLT3. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:1207–1215. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Piatnitskaia S, et al. USP10 is a critical factor for Tau-positive stress granule formation in neuronal cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:10591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47033-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Takahashi M, et al. USP10 is a driver of ubiquitinated protein aggregation and aggresome formation to inhibit apoptosis. iScience. 2018;9:433–450. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bomberger JM, et al. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin that hijacks the host ubiquitin proteolytic system. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001325. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Boulkroun S, et al. Vasopressin-inducible ubiquitin-specific protease 10 increases ENaC cell surface expression by deubiquitylating and stabilizing sorting nexin 3. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2008;295:F889–F900. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00001.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chang CT, et al. Vasopressin-stimulated CFTR Cl- currents are increased in the renal collecting duct cells of a mouse model of Liddle’s syndrome. J. Physiol. 2005;562:271–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.077933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lahr TF, Record RD, Hoover DK, Hughes CL, Blazer-Yost BL. Characterization of the ion transport responses to ADH in the MDCK-C7 cell line. Pflug. Arch. 2000;439:610–617. doi: 10.1007/s004240050984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Harrigan JA, Jacq X, Martin NM, Jackson SP. Deubiquitylating enzymes and drug discovery: emerging opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:57–78. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Robak P, Robak T. Bortezomib for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: 15 years later. Drugs R. D. 2019;19:73–92. doi: 10.1007/s40268-019-0269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Richardson PG, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:2609–2617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yuan T, et al. Inhibition of ubiquitin-specific proteases as a novel anticancer therapeutic strategy. Front. Pharm. 2018;9:1080. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Shanmugham A, Ovaa H. DUBs and disease: activity assays for inhibitor development. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2008;11:688–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chauhan D, et al. A small molecule inhibitor of ubiquitin-specific protease-7 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:345–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen J, et al. Selective and cell-active inhibitors of the USP1/ UAF1 deubiquitinase complex reverse cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Chem. Biol. 2011;18:1390–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dexheimer, T. S. et al. Discovery of ML323 as a novel inhibitor of the USP1/UAF1 deubiquitinase complex. In Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program [Internet] (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK259186/. [PubMed]
  • 99.Nelson EA, et al. The STAT5 inhibitor pimozide decreases survival of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells resistant to kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2011;117:3421–3429. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-255232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Potu H, et al. Usp5 links suppression of p53 and FAS levels in melanoma to the BRAF pathway. Oncotarget. 2014;5:5559–5569. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kapuria V, et al. Deubiquitinase inhibition by small-molecule WP1130 triggers aggresome formation and tumor cell apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9265–9276. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Shao S, et al. Spautin-1, a novel autophagy inhibitor, enhances imatinib-induced apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;44:1661–1668. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Schott CR, Ludwig L, Mutsaers AJ, Foster RA, Wood GA. The autophagy inhibitor spautin-1, either alone or combined with doxorubicin, decreases cell survival and colony formation in canine appendicular osteosarcoma cells. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0206427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Correa RJ, et al. Combination of AKT inhibition with autophagy blockade effectively reduces ascites-derived ovarian cancer cell viability. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:1951–1961. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Liao Y, et al. Inhibition of EGFR signaling with Spautin-1 represents a novel therapeutics for prostate cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:157. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1165-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Guo J, et al. Potent USP10/13 antagonist spautin-1 suppresses melanoma growth via ROS-mediated DNA damage and exhibits synergy with cisplatin. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:4324–4340. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES