Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2020 Jun 28;599(6):1759–1767. doi: 10.1113/JP278816

Biological validation of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) image oxygen thresholds in tissue

Inna Gertsenshteyn 1,2,3, Mihai Giurcanu 4, Peter Vaupel 5,6, Howard Halpern 2,3
PMCID: PMC7719598  NIHMSID: NIHMS1607958  PMID: 32506448

Abstract

Measuring molecular oxygen levels in vivo has been the cornerstone of understanding the effects of hypoxia in normal tissues and malignant tumors. Here we discuss the advances in a variety of partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) measurements and imaging techniques and relevant oxygen thresholds. A focus on electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) imaging shows the validation of treating hypoxic tumours with a threshold of PO210 Torr, and demonstrates utility for in vivo oxygen imaging, as well as its current and future role in cancer studies.

Keywords: electron paramagnetic resonance, hypoxia, oxygen sensing

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1607958-f0001.jpg

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is a powerful tool for quantitative imaging of PO2 to study and treat tumour hypoxia. This example shows a preclinical tumour mouse model injected with an oxygen spin probe (OX063-d24) into the tail vein for diffusion throughout the tumour, and the resulting hypoxic regions defined by PO210 Torr obtained by EPR imaging.

Introduction

For over a century, molecular oxygen concentrations in tissues and malignancies of living systems have been found to correlate with various anti-cancer treatment effects, beginning with radiation toxicity (Schwarz, 1909). Low oxygenation in all living systems results in resistance to radiation toxicity (Howard-Flanders, 1958; Thomlinson & Gray, 1955). The enormous complexity of living systems can confound such measurements since they depend on the intrinsic accuracy (i.e. oxygen resolution) of the measurements, the volume to which individual measurements are sensitive (spatial resolution), and the sources of confounding physiological variation that affect the measurement of the molecular oxygen concentrations. Imaging molecular oxygen content further complicates the process.

The partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) is an absolute measurement, with some uncertainty, of oxygen in vivo. As oxygen moves from the blood plasma (a source) to the mitochondria (a sink) by diffusion, a gradient is formed, with pressure lower at the sink than at the source (Wilson et al. 2006). The difference in PO2, and therefore the gradient, increases with the rate of oxygen consumption within a cell. While in vitro cellular measurements describe the 50% onset of radiation resistance to radiation at ~2.5 Torr (= mmHg), in vivo tissue and tumour measurements have clustered about 10 Torr (Vaupel et al. 2007; Vaupel & Mayer, 2015). In vivo, malignant well-oxygenated cells have PO2 values between 10 and 60 Torr.

It is important not to assign a universal threshold of hypoxia to any tissues, cells, microvessels, etc. Relevant thresholds and their onsets vary depending on the physiological process being studied and how those measurements are taken, as demonstrated in Fig. 1. For example, in vivo experiments of tissue determine that critical PO2 is between 8 and 10 mmHg, while in vitro experiments on cytochromes determine 0.02–0.07 mmHg as the critical threshold. In addition, mean concentrations of ATP, PME, Pi and pH rise and fall differently as a function of PO2 (Höckel & Vaupel, 2001).

Figure 1. Schematic of critical oxygen levels that characterize the onset of hypoxia.

Figure 1.

Below these thresholds, functions of tissues, cells and organelles change. Filled bars represent mechanisms at the organelle and molecular levels; hatched bars represent cellular functions; open bars represent therapy forms. Reprinted with permission from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (Hockel & Vaupel, 2001).

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is a new imaging modality that accurately measures PO2, and has shown promising results to optimize preclinical oxygen image-guided radiation therapy. A goal of this article is to demonstrate the basics of EPR imaging and other oxygen imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET), and the relevant PO2 thresholds in tissues.

Measurement and imaging methods

Fundamentals of EPR imaging

The relationships between energy, the magnetic moment, and the magnetic field are similar in electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in their dependence on the particle mass. Because the mass of an electron is approximately three orders of magnitude smaller than the mass of a proton, the magnetic field strength of an EPR imager is reduced to 9–40 mTesla, rather than the 1.5–9.4 Tesla field strength used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, EPR imagers are significantly lighter, more affordable to build and maintain, and have no possibility for harmful or even fatal accidents compared to MR imagers (Panych & Madore, 2018). Nevertheless, EPR PO2 imaging is accompanied by T2-weighted MRI, which provides high resolution anatomical contrast to define the boundaries of tumours, or other structures of interest, registered with the EPR PO2 images.

In MRI, the main magnetic field aligns the abundant water hydrogen nuclear spins in one direction as a net magnetization. Without this main magnetic field, the proton spins are randomly oriented. A second magnetic field disturbs the proton spins by a pulse of electro-magnetic energy, which induces transitions between energy levels. Because the lower level has more members, there is a net absorption of energy creating a population excitation (Pooley, 2005).

A pulse response imager measures the time it takes for those disturbed spins to relax to their undisturbed orientations (also called the relaxation rate) over micro-second time intervals with 10’s of kilohertz repetitions (Currie et al. 2013). The excitations take place in a series of magnetic field gradients, which causes the absorption to occur at different, identifiable locations and transforms that information into an image (Lauterbur, 1973; Bottomley & Andrew, 1978).

Unlike MRI, EPR imaging measures unpaired electron spins of dissolved and diffusible molecules (Gallez et al. 2004). These are scarce in biological systems since free metals like iron and copper catalyse chemical reactions. These transition metal unpaired electron spins are bound in carrying proteins or enzymes, and are not measurable at low EPR frequencies at biologically relevant temperatures (Epel & Halpern, 2013). The exception is molecular oxygen (O2), which is free to diffuse in living tissues. O2 bears two unpaired, rapidly relaxing electrons. The relaxation is too fast to directly measure; therefore, an oxygen spin probe must be introduced into the system in question (Gallez et al. 2004; Biller et al. 2011).

Each spin probe (e.g. OX063-d24 in Fig. 2A) contains a relatively stable unpaired electron that interacts with the two unpaired electrons of oxygen molecules (Matsumoto et al. 2004). The EPR imager can detect the relaxation rates of the spin probes, and how their relaxation rates change in the presence or absence of oxygen (Bobko et al. 2009; Epel et al. 2014). There is a linear relationship between the relaxation rate of the spin probe and PO2, where low PO2 corresponds to a low relaxation rate, and high PO2 corresponds to a high relaxation rate (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. Quantitative PO2 imaging with spin lattice relaxation EPR.

Figure 2.

A, chemical structure of oxygen spin probe OX063-d24, which is infused into the mouse via tail vein. B, in the EPR spin-lattice relaxation signal, the relaxation rate of the spin probe is higher for high PO2 and lower for low PO2. C, tomographic reconstruction shows a 3D quantitative distribution of PO2 in the tumour in isotropic voxels of 0.67 × 0.67 × 0.67 mm3, where PO2 voxels ≤ 10 Torr show hypoxia (blue).

Overall, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the system varies with the number of spins in that voxel, and higher SNR leads to a higher spatial resolution of the image. Currently, the range of spatial resolution in EPR is 1–5 mm with the higher resolution at lower PO2.

In a 250-MHz (a low frequency) pulse EPR imager, a trityl spin probe (OX063-d24) as shown in Fig. 2A is useful for oxygen imaging in vivo because of its strong signal and low toxicity (Kuzhelev et al. 2015; Epel et al. 2019). Once injected into the mouse tail vein, the probes diffuse in the extracellular fluid compartment of the tumour, where the clearance half-time is 20–30 min, while the clearance half-time in the blood stream is 2–5 min (Epel et al. 2010) due to enhanced permeability and retention (Maeda et al. 2000). The original in vivo pulse EPR PO2 imaging technique is due to the group of Murali Krisha at the National Cancer Institute (Bourg et al. 1993). Recent in vivo spectral spatial images using rapid scan EPR have been developed by the Khramtsov group at West Virginia University (Tseytlin et al. 2019).

Multiple projections of the spin probes’ relaxation rates are acquired in the EPR imager to generate a three-dimensional image (Fig. 2C), where each voxel corresponds to a PO2 value. The heterogeneity of hypoxia within the tumour shows the importance of imaging the entire volume, rather than just one- or two-dimensional measurements (Williams et al. 2002). Fiducial-based registration of the EPR image to an anatomical CT or MRI image is necessary to define anatomical boundaries.

In general, EPR imaging has the advantage of a high quantitative accuracy, with uncertainty less than 1 Torr in the range of 1–10 Torr (Epel et al. 2014; Epel et al. 2019). This makes EPR imaging ideal in differentiating hypoxic vs. well-oxygenated regions. EPR imagers also have different penetration depth abilities depending on their frequency, which ranges from 0.2 to 1 GHz.

Imaging at a lower frequency, such as 250 MHz, has an 8 cm penetration depth (Roschmann, 1987), which is advantageous to quantitative imaging of larger animals (Halpern et al. 1994; Epel et al. 2010). High frequency EPR oximetry at 1.2 GHz has a penetration depth at 5–10mm, which is limited to small animal imaging or peripheral anatomy (Swartz & Clarkson, 1998). The tradeoff, however, is that the sensitivity of an EPR instrument increases with increasing frequency as v0.8 (Halpern et al. 1994; Rinard et al. 2002), so the SNR is sacrificed for a higher penetration depth.

PO2 measurement methods

It is possible to obtain a larger penetration depth (8 cm or more) with phosphorescence quenching at optical frequencies with a more invasive fiberoptic needle probe or a needle electrode. Both the OxyLite PO2 system (Oxford ptronics, UK) (Seddon et al. 2001) and the polarographic microelectrode measures a local PO2 (Braun et al. 2001).

Eppendorf polarographic needle electrodes measure PO2 within tissues, and have been integral in demonstrating the heterogeneity of oxygenation in human tumours (Höckel et al. 1991; Vaupel et al. 1991; Okunieff et al. 1993; Brizel et al. 1994). Eppendorf needle electrodes have also extensively been used to determine that, in tumour tissues, the threshold of 10 Torr predicted malignant progression in cervical cancer (Höckel et al. 1993, 1996). These studies emphasized the importance of personalized treatment of tumours, even 30 years ago. All these needle probes, however, are invasive and only obtain measurements of local PO2.

An optical method of imaging PO2 uses phosphorescence quenching of an infused porphyrin molecular sensor. The phosphorescent lifetimes of various probes were found to depend on the oxygen concentration (Vanderkooi et al. 1987). The advantages of oxygen measurements by phosphorescence includes millisecond response time with accuracy down to 0.1 Torr in low-oxygen pressures – a wide dynamic range, and applicable to in vivo tissue measurements (Wilson et al. 2006).

Using phosphorescence quenching, PO2 maps can be imaged in mice using pulsed trans-illumination. The phosphorescent probe decays over time, and the phosphorescence decay constant is calculated for each pixel fit to a single exponential. A two-dimensional PO2 image showed low PO2 values were present in the same tumour locations within the mouse (Wilson et al. 2006). This demonstration of quantifying and imaging oxygen is not in 3D, though tomographic imaging is theoretically possible (Apreleva et al. 2006).

The absorption of optical frequency limits this technique to window chamber models, invasive direct microscopy or images of very superficial structures.

Qualitative hypoxia measurements with PET

Several radiotracers are available to image with PET to assess hypoxia, though the accuracy of these tracers has been questioned for decades. The threshold of uptake to identify hypoxic voxels varies greatly depending on several factors, including but not limited to the radiotracer’s injection method, uptake unit, time imaged post-injection, and quality of the PET machine (Raleigh et al. 1996; Peeters et al. 2015; Silvoniemi et al. 2018).

One of the most widely used radiotracers for clinical cancer studies is 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), a nitroimidazole compound labelled with F-18. The F-18 radionuclide has a 110-min half-life, and the misonidazole biological half-life is 50 min (Jerabek et al. 1986; Grierson et al. 1989). Once the nitroimidazole enters a hypoxic cell, it can undergo reduction and consequent local molecular binding. This binds the nitroimidazole inside the cell. In normal well-oxygenated cells, the reduced nitro group can be oxidized back into the original substance by O2 and diffuse away (Xu et al. 2017).

Within 2–4 h, FMISO accumulates in hypoxic cells and the radionuclide can be detected by PET imaging systems. FMISO has non-specific accumulation in normoxic colon tissues or no accumulation in pancreatic tumours, however, so FMISO is a tumour-type dependent radiotracer subject to confounding variation (Roels et al. 2008; Segard et al. 2013).

FMISO binds to hypoxic cells in the range between 2 and 10 Torr, because chronically hypoxic cells do not appear to retain the tracer (Rasey et al. 1987). There is also controversy between whether the pharmacokinetics and distribution of FMISO are affected by the immature and disorganized tumour microvasculature, which could also prevent the tracer from reaching hypoxic regions far from capillaries.

Early in vitro cell work showed a sigmoidal relationship between FMISO uptake and oxygen concentration, where uptake increased at low oxygen (Rasey & Evans, 1991). The point of inflection on this sigmoidal curve would indicate the threshold of hypoxia in terms of FMISO uptake and PO2 levels, which is currently under investigation at the Halpern laboratory in collaboration with the Kao laboratory in a home-built hybrid PET-EPR imaging system (Kim et al. 2019).

FMISO is used in clinical trials for imaging hypoxic tumours and planning radiation treatments based on the FMISO uptake. However, its clinical usefulness has not yet been shown to be significantly more effective than fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), which accumulates in cells with high glucose metabolism. Distinction in titles is that EPR measured PO2 quantitatively, while PET tracers accumulate in hypoxic cells. The image can be quantified in terms of standard uptake value (SUV), or the ratios of tumour to blood and muscle. Variation in PET imagers across and within institutions also contribute to a lack of standardization.

In a recent publication, the ratio of FMISO radioactivity levels in tumour to blood was found to be 1.43 ± 0.50 and 1.32 ± 0.12 at 2 and 4 h post-injection, respectively; the tumour to muscle ratio was 1.31 ± 0.52 and 1.12 ± 0.30 at 2 and 4 h (Masaki et al. 2015). Finally, a ±recent French FMISO consortium study found no benefit to directing increased radiation dose to hypoxic tumour regions defined using FMISO PET (Vera et al. 2017, 2019). This high variance hints at the extensive future work that must be done to determine whether there is an absolute threshold of FMISO uptake for treating tumour hypoxia as there is with EPR imaging (PO210 Torr).

A major difference to keep in mind between the nitroimidazole for PET imaging, and the trityl spin probe imaged with EPR, is that the nitroimidazole binds intra-cellularly where the FMISO accumulates. In contrast, the spin probe diffuses in the tumour extracellularly and is simply measuring the relaxation rates of the exogenous spin probes in the presence or absence of oxygen. The extracellular localization may explain the lack of animal toxicity when using appropriate amounts for imaging.

Relevance of thresholds for PO2 measurement and images

Determination of a threshold separating hypoxic from well oxygenated tissue or tumour regions is a bivariate process: either the tissue PO2 is above or below the threshold. This is similar to the process by which human X-rays are determined by a radiologist to be either normal or abnormal, the latter prompting either further radiographic study or medical intervention. This binary process originated during World War II using radar or sonar signals to separate benign objects from dangerous objects. It is commonly referred to as receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis (Metz, 1978).

One can apply a form of ROC analysis to a continuous characteristic of tissue, in this case the PO2 of each voxel within the image. A crucial component of ROC analysis is choosing a biologically relevant threshold of a property, e.g. local therapy resistance, the local level at which a hypoxia responsive protein is produced, therapy sensitivity, or the level at which the hypoxia responsive protein ceases.

The mathematical model of this situation assumes that there are two populations of voxels, each with its own distribution and PO2 values. It is assumed that there is an optimal PO2 threshold to distinguish between the two populations. In the case of using a PO2 image to define this, it is also assumed that there are macroscopic tissue regions of contiguous voxels that have the same property, such as radioresistance.

One can estimate the fraction of hypoxic voxels in core samples of tumour tissue for a given PO2 threshold using the EPR PO2 image, and measure the concentration of a hypoxia-associated protein such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in each biopsied sample (Elas et al. 2011). Plotting a curve of the fraction of regions included from the definition of hypoxia vs. the fraction included at a given level of hypoxia protein provides an example of the ROC curve.

A central parameter of ROC analysis is the area under the curve (AUC). Increased AUC describes a more significant distinction provided by the threshold and improved prediction accuracy.

In preliminary analysis of mouse core biopsy specimens, the selection of a PO2 threshold of 10 Torr provided the highest AUC correlation with hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) in the core biopsy specimens. Interestingly, the AUC maximum for VEGF was 30 Torr, confirming previous analysis (Elas et al. 2011). Further development of applying ROC analysis to determine optimal thresholds for various hypoxia-related protein concentrations is ongoing.

EPR oxygen imaging for cancer therapy

In the first complete study of radiation dose painting to treat hypoxic mammalian tumour regions with a boost of radiation, a low-frequency 250 MHz EPR imager with pulsed spin-lattice relaxation oxygen imaging was used to image PO2 (Epel et al. 2019). A threshold of PO210 Torr was used to define tumour hypoxia.

Currently a typical human clinical treatment plan radiates an entire tumour with one or fractionated doses with homogeneous dose distribution. By applying a boost (extra radiation) to hypoxic cells with a higher dose, the treatment would spare healthy surrounding tissue. This is referred to as dose painting, and remains controversial in the field because of a history of increased radiation complication due to unnecessary ‘hot spots’ in the radiation dose distributions, particularly to critical structures necessary to maintain good quality of life.

Despite this clinical controversy, few preclinical experiments have tested the efficacy of dose painting hypoxic regions. Based on EPR oxygen images, the Halpern laboratory has radiated two randomized groups of similar distribution in tumour size and hypoxic fraction. In one group, a radiation boost was delivered to hypoxic tumour regions (Fig. 3A) compared to a boost of equal volumes to well-oxygenated tumour regions (Fig. 3B). Tumours were grown in the leg gastrocnemius muscle of C3H mice to radiobiologically relevant size for imaging and radiation treatment, and were observed for tumour recurrence. This study has been completed and published (Epel et al. 2019) in FSa fibrosarcoma tumour mouse models and repeated for confirmation in MCa4 mammary adenocarcinoma tumour mouse models (H. Halpern, in press).

Figure 3. Method and results boosting hypoxic or well oxygenated tumor form EPR PO2 images.

Figure 3.

A and B, radiation treatment plans and delivery schemes for hypoxia boost (A) and hypoxia avoidance boost (B). The selected tumour slice is a quantitative PO2 map, as indicated by the colour bar. Upper left corners display the block shape apertures to deliver the dose beam. C, the resulting Kaplan-Meier survival (tumour recurrence) probability using a competing risk model with log-rank analysis for fibrosarcoma tumour mouse models, showing a significantly higher survival probability for hypoxia boost treatments (P < 0.05). Figure reproduced with permission from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics (Epel et al. 2019).

These EPR studies demonstrated a significant increase in tumour control (P < 0.05) in two mammalian tumour types using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, one of which has been published and is shown in Fig. 3C (Epel et al. 2019). Of note, the significant difference was obtained in a randomized experiment with a total of 54 animal subjects. This demonstrates the efficacy of dose painting by specifically targeting hypoxic tumour regions. In humans, these hypoxic regions are less likely to include the critical tissues and organs necessary to maintain a high degree of function.

In radiation treatment, >98% of hypoxia was targeted, with the dose map conforming to the heterogeneous hypoxic regions. A previous study that only targeted 85% of hypoxia failed, which underscores the strength of hypoxic cancer cells and the importance of accurately targeting them.

This work demonstrates a biological endpoint: improved local tumour control based on the EPR PO2 image. It is the first demonstration of improved control in a mammalian tumour after over a century of knowing about hypoxic resistance. It validates several issues including the use of the 10 Torr tumour threshold, the ability of EPR PO2 image to define it and finally, the effectiveness of delivery of the hypoxic boost within 2 h of obtaining the PO2 image.

Conclusions

This year, The Journal of Physiology celebrates the passage of a century since Krogh published in The Journal his definition of the size of the drainage region of a capillary before onset of metabolism induced hypoxia and the definition of a PO2 threshold (Krogh, 1919).

As previously noted, there are several PO2 thresholds that have biologically relevant consequences. An important threshold is the onset of tumour resistance to cytotoxic tumour therapy, particularly radiation. EPR PO2 images appear to be, in two preclinical tumour models (Epel et al. 2019; H. Halpern, in press), able to define radiation resistant regions that with extra radiation doses improve tumour control relative to increased radiation to oxygenated tumour portions. That there are targetable macroscopic resistant regions in these preclinical models is of significance.

Much work remains to provide technology for human application and demonstration of the safety of the use of the spin probe in human subjects. If this is borne out, we must demonstrate the existence of such macroscopic, targetable regions in human tumours. Only then can we provide a major path to the improvement of the therapeutic index in radiation delivery.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mellissa Grana for her proofreading and suggestions in this report.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering grant numbers T32 EB002103 and P41 EB002034, and by the National Cancer Institute grant numbers R01 CA236385, R01 CA098575, and P30 CA014599.

Biographies

Inna Gertsenshteyn received a BA in physics from Boston University in 2015. Upon graduation she joined inviCRO, now a Konica-Minolta Company, as an image analyst for drug development studies. In 2017, she joined the University of Chicago as a graduate student in medical physics. Her PhD dissertation with co-advisors Howard Halpern, MD, PhD, and Chin-Tu Chen, PhD, focuses on multimodal imaging of tumor hypoxia using PET, EPR and MR imaging.

graphic file with name nihms-1607958-b0002.gif

Howard Halpern is both a physicist in high energy physics and a physician in radiation oncology. He has directed major developments of EPR oxygen imaging and is Director of the NIH Centre for EPR Imaging In Vivo Physiology. Along with leaders in the field like Dr Peter Vaupel, Ms Gertsenshteyn and Dr Halpern are interested in the physiological effects of tumour hypoxia and how to best treat it.

graphic file with name nihms-1607958-b0003.gif

Footnotes

This review was presented at the ‘ISOTT 2019 oxygen transport to tissue’ meeting, which took place in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 28–31 July 2019.

Competing interests

US patents 8,664,955 B1, 9,392,957 B1, 10,551,450 B2, and 10,568,537 B2 were recently awarded to H.H., who is also a member of a start-up company O2M to market PO2 imaging technology. Other authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. Apreleva SV, Wilson DF & Vinogradov SA (2006). Tomographic imaging of oxygen by phosphorescence lifetime. Appl Opt 45, 8547–8559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bobko AA, Dhimitruka I, Eubank TD, Marsh CB, Zweier JL & Khramtsov VV (2009). Trityl-based EPR probe with enhanced sensitivity to oxygen. Free Rad Bio and Medicine 47, 654–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biller JR, Meyer V, Elajaili H, Rosen GM, Kao GPY, Eaton SS & Eaton GR (2011). Relaxation times and line widths of isotropically-substituted nitroxides in aqueous solution at X-band. Magn Reson 212, 370–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bottomley PA & Andrew ER (1978). RF Magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: implications for NMR imaging. Phys Med Biol 23, 630–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourg J, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB, Tschudin RG, Pohida TJ, Friauf WS, Smith PD, Metcalfe J, Harrington F & Subramanian S (1993). Radiofrequency FT EPR spectroscopy and imaging. J Magn Reson 103, 112–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun RD, Lanzen JL, Snyder SA & Dewhirst MW (2001). Comparison of tumor and normal tissue oxygen tension measurements using OxyLite or micro-electrodes in rodents. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280, H2533–H2544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brizel DM, Rosner GL, Harrelson J, Prosnitz LR & Dewhirst MW (1994). Pretreatment oxygenation profiles of human soft tissue sarcomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30, 635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Currie S, Hoggard N, Craven IJ, Hadjivassiliou M & Wilkinson ID (2013). Understanding MRI: basic MR physics for physicians. Postgrad Med J 89, 209–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elas M, Hleihel D, Barth ED, Haney CR, Ahn K-H, Pelizzari CA, Epel B, Weichselbaum RR, Halpern HJ (2011). Where it’s at really matters: In situ in vivo vascular endothelial growth factor spatially correlates with electron paramagnetic resonance po2 images in tumors of living mice. Mol Imag Biol, 13, 1107–1113. 10.1007/s11307-010-0436-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Epel B & Halpern H (2013). Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging in vivo. Electron Paramag Res, 23, 180–208. [Google Scholar]
  11. Epel B, Bowman MK, Mailer C & Halpern HJ (2014). Absolute oxygen R-1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 72, 362–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Epel B, Haney CR, Hleihel D, Wardrip C, Barth ED & Halpern HJ (2010). Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of a rabbit tumor using localized spin probe delivery. Med Phys 37, 2553–2559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Epel B, Maggio MC, Barth ED, Miller RC, Pelizzari CA, Krzykawska-Serda M, Sundramoorthy SV, Aydogan B, Weichselbaum RR, Tormyshev VM & Halpern HJ (2019). Oxygen-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103, 977–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gallez B, Baudelet C & Jordan BF (2004). Assessment of tumor oxygenation by electron paramagnetic resonance: principles and applications. NMR Biomed 17, 240–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grierson JR, Link JM, Mathis CA, Rasey JS & Krohn KA (1989). A radiosynthesis of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole. J Nucl Med 30, 343–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Halpern HJ (2019). EPR molecular oxygen images identify biologically relevant tumor hypoxia in two mammalian models to increase tumor control [abstract]. In Poster Session 3: Neuroscience, New Chemistry, Biology & Bioengineering Oncology, 2nd Poster Award Nominee Presentations and Judging; 2019 Sept 3–7; WMIC, Montreal, Canada; Abstract nr P258. [Google Scholar]
  17. Halpern HJ, Yu C, Peric M, Barth E, Grdina DJ & Teicher BA (1994). Oxymetry deep in tissues with low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 13047–13051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Höckel M, Knoop C, Schlenger K, Vorndran B, Baussmann E, Mitze M, Knapstein PG, & Vaupel P (1993). Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Radiother Oncol 26, 45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Höckel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schäffer U & Vaupel P (1996). Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res 56, 4509–4515 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Höckel M, Schlenger K, Knoop C & Vaupel P (1991). Oxygenation of carcinomas of the uterine cervix: evaluation by computerized O2 tension measurements. Cancer Res 51, 6098–6102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Höckel M & Vaupel P (2001). Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93, 266–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howard-Flanders P (1958). Physical and chemical mechanisms in the injury of cells by ionizing radiation. Adv Biol Med Phys 6, 553–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jerabek PA, Patrick TB, Kilbourn MR, Dischino DD & Welch MJ (1986). Synthesis and biodistribution of 18F-labeled fluoronitroimidazoles: potential in vivo markers of hypoxic tissue. Int J Appl Rad Isotopes 37, 599–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim H, Epel B, Sundramoorthy S, Tsai H-M, Barth E, Halpern H, Chen C-T, Kao C-M (2019). Development of a PET/EPRI simultaneous imaging system for assessing tumor hypoxia [abstract]. In Instrumentation: New System Design and Emerging Technology II; 2019 June 22–25; SNMMI, Anaheim, CA; Abstract nr 526. [Google Scholar]
  25. Krogh A (1919). The supply of oxygen to the tissues and the regulation of the capillary circulation. J Physiol 52, 457–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuzhelev AA, Trukhin DV, Krumkacheva OA, Strizhakov RK, Rogozhnikova OY, Troitskaya TI, Fedin MV, Tormyshev VM & Bagryanskaya EG (2015). Room-temperature electron spin relaxation of triarylmethyl radicals at the X- and Q-bands. J Phys Chem B 119, 13630–13640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lauterbur P (1973). Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 242, 190–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y & Hori K (2000). Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release 65, 271–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Masaki Y, Shimizu Y Yoshioka T, Tanaka Y, Nishijima K, Zhao S, Higashino K, Sakamoto S, Numata Y, Yamaguchi Y, Tamaki N & Kuge Y (2015) The accumulation mechanism of the hypoxia imaging probe “FMISO” by imaging mass spectrometry: possible involvement of low-molecular metabolites. Sci Rep 5, 16802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsumoto K, English S, Yoo J, Yamada K, Devasahayam N, Cook JA, Mitchell JB, Subramanian S & Krishna MC (2004). Pharmacokinetics of a triarylmethyl-type paramagnetic spin probe used in EPR oximetry. Magnet Reson Med 52:885–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Metz CE (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 8, 283–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Okunieff P, Höckel M, Dunphy EE, Schlenger K, Knoop C & Vaupel P (1993). Oxygen tension distributions are sufficient to explain the local response of human breast tumors treated with radiation alone. Int J Radiat Biol Oncol Phys 26, 631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Panych LP & Madore B (2018). The physics of MRI safety. J Mag Res Im 47, 28–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Peeters SG, Zegers CM, Lieuwes NG, van Elmpt W, Eriksson J, van Dongen GA, Dubois L & Lambin P (2015). A comparative study of the hypoxia PET tracers [18F]HX4, [18F]FAZA, and [18F] FMISO in a preclinical tumor model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91, 351–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pooley RA (2005). Fundamental physics of MR imaging. RadioGraphics 25, 1087–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Raleigh JA, Dewhirst MW & Thrall DE (1996). Measuring tumor hypoxia. Semin Radiat Oncol 6, 37–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rasey JS & Evans ML (1991). Detecting hypoxia in human tumors. Vaupel Peter & Jain RK, Tumor Blood Supply and Metabolic Microenvironment: Characterization and Implications for Therapy (Funktionsanalyse Biologischer Systeme, 20). Gustav Fischer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rasey JS, Grunbaum Z, Magee S, Nelson NJ, Olive PL, Durand RE & Krohn KA (1987). Characterization of radiolabeled fluoromisonidazole as a probe for hypoxic cells. Radiat Res 111, 292–304 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rinard GA, Quine RW, Eaton SS & Eaton GR (2002). Frequency dependence of EPR signal intensity, 250 MHz to 9.1 GHz. J Magn Reson 154, 80–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roels S, Slagmolen P, Nuyts J, Lee JA, Loeckx D, Maes F, Stroobants S, Penninckx F & Haustermans K (2008) Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: is there a role for FMISO or FLT, next to FDG? Acta Oncol 47, 1237–1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roschmann P (1987). Radiofrequency penetration and absorption in the human body: limitations to high-field whole-body nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 14, 922–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwarz G (1909) Uber Desensibilisierung gegen Rontgen- und Radiumstrahlen. Munchner Medizinishe Wochenschrift 56, 1217–1218. [Google Scholar]
  43. Seddon BM, Honess DJ, Vojnovic B, Tozer GM & Workman P (2001). Measurement of tumor oxygenation: in vivo comparison of a luminescence fiber-optic sensor and a polarographic electrode in the p22 tumor. Radiat Res 155, 837–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Segard T, Robins PD, Yusoff IF, Ee H, Morandeau L, Campbell EM, Francis RJ (2013). Detection of hypoxia with 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) PET/CT in suspected or proven pancreatic cancer. Clin Nucl Med, 38, 1–6. 10.1097/rlu.0b013e3182708777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silvoniemi A, Suilamo S, Laitinen T, Forsback S, Löyttyniemi E, Vaittinen S, Saunavaara V, Solin O, Grönroos TJ & Minn H (2018). Repeatability of tumour hypoxia imaging using [18F]EF5 PET/CT in head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 161–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Swartz HM & Clarkson RB (1998). The measurement of oxygen in vivo using EPR techniques. Phys Med Biol 43, 1957–1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomlinson RH & Gray LH (1955). The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 9, 539–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tseytlin O, Guggilapu P, Bobko AA, Al Ahmad H, Xu X, Epel B, O’Connell R, Hoblitzell EH, Eubank TD, Khramtsov VV, Driesschaert B, Kazkaz E & Tseytlin M (2019). Modular imaging system: Rapid scan EPR at 800 MHz. J Magn Reson 305, 94–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vanderkooi JM, Maniara G, Green TJ & Wilson DF (1987). An optical method for measurement of dioxygen concentration based upon quenching of phosphorescence. J Biol Chem 262, 5476–5482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vaupel P, Höckel M & Mayer A (2007). Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography. Antioxid Redox Signal 9, 1221–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Vaupel P & Mayer A (2015). The clinical importance of assessing tumor hypoxia: relationship of tumor hypoxia to prognosis and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal 22, 878–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vaupel P, Schlenger K, Knoop C & Höckel M (1991). Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized O2 tension measurements. Cancer Res 51, 3316–3322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vera P, Mihailescu SD, Lequesne J, Modzelewski R, Bohn P, Hapdey S, Pépin LF, Dubray B, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Decazes P, Thureau S & all investigators of RTEP5 study (2019). Radiotherapy boost in patients with hypoxic lesions identified by (18)F-FMISO PET/CT in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: can we expect a better survival outcome without toxicity? [RTEP5 long-term follow-up]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46, 1448–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vera P, Thureau S, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Modzelewski R, Bohn P, Vermandel M, Hapdey S, Pallardy A, Mahé MA, Lacombe M, Boisselier P, Guillemard S, Olivier P, Beckendorf V, Salem N, Charrier N, Chajon E, Devillers A, Aide N, Danhier S, Denis F, Muratet JP, Martin E, Riedinger AB, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Dansin E, Massabeau C, Courbon F, Farcy Jacquet MP, Kotzki PO, Houzard C, Mornex F, Vervueren L, Paumier A, Fernandez P, Salaun M & Dubray B (2017). Phase II study of a radiotherapy total dose increase in hypoxic lesions identified by 18F-Misonidazole PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (RTEP5 Study). J Nucl Med 58, 1045–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilson DF, Lee WM, Makonnen S, Finikova O, Apreleva S & Vinogradov SA (2006). Oxygen pressures in the interstitial space and their relationship to those in the blood plasma in resting skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 101, 1648–1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams BB, al Hallaq H, Chandramouli GV, Barth ED, Rivers JN, Lewis M, Galtsev VE, Karczmar GS & Halpern HJ (2002). Imaging spin probe distribution in the tumor of a living mouse with 250 MHz EPR: correlation with BOLD MRI. Magn Reson Med 47, 634–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wilson DF, Vinogradov S, Lo L-W & Huang L (2006). Oxygen dependent quenching of phosphorescence: a status report. Adv Exp Med Biol 388, 101–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu Z, Li X-F, Zou H, Sun X & Shen B (2017). 18F-Fluoromisonidazole in tumor hypoxia imaging. Oncotarget 8, 94969–94979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES