Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is an endocrine hormone that regulates carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. In humans, circulating FGF21 is inactivated by proteolytic cleavage of its C-terminus, thereby preventing signalling through a receptor complex. The mechanism for this cleavage event and the factors contributing to the post-translational regulation of FGF21 activity has previously been unknown. In a recent issue of the Biochemical Journal, Zhen et al. have identified fibroblast activation protein (FAP) as the endopeptidase responsible for this site-specific cleavage of human FGF21 (hFGF21), and propose that inhibition of FAP may be a therapeutic strategy to increase endogenous levels of active FGF21.
Keywords: dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), proteolytic cleavage
Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is an endocrine hormone that is a critical regulator of energy homoeostasis and a potential therapeutic target for treating diabetes and obesity. Pharmacological administration of FGF21 to diabetic and obese animal models markedly improves insulin sensitivity and causes weight loss [1]. Administration of FGF21 analogues to obese humans also improves plasma metabolic profiles [2,3] and significantly increases weight loss [2]. Therefore, considerable effort has been employed to identify the mechanism of FGF21 action and to identify ways to increase its therapeutic efficacy to treat diabetes and obesity.
Circulating levels of FGF21 are produced primarily by the liver, but may also be produced from other tissues during stress [1]. FGF21 plays a critical role in a number of physiological processes including the adaptive fasting response [4,5], enhancement of insulin sensitivity during refeeding and overfeeding [6], and the regulation of macronutrient preference [7]. Upon entering circulation, FGF21 functions by signalling to specific tissues that express both a traditional FGF receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), and the co-receptor β-Klotho. Although FGFR1 has a broad tissue expression pattern, β-Klotho is expressed in a limited number of metabolic tissues and provides specificity for FGF21 signalling [8]. FGF21 interacts with FGFR1 through its N-terminus and with β-Klotho through its C-terminus. This C-terminal region of FGF21 is essential to activate the receptor complex to initiate signalling [9,10].
Much less is known, however, about the mechanisms regulating FGF21 stability and activity in circulation. The half-life of exogenously administered FGF21 is short, being approximately 0.4–2 h depending on the species and the method of delivery [11-13]. Previous work with mice and monkeys revealed that full-length human FGF21 (hFGF21; 181 amino acids) is rapidly cleaved on its C-terminus between Pro171 and Ser172 [14,15]. Studies with truncated FGF21 proteins determined that deletion of these ten residues from the C-terminus of FGF21 disrupts its ability to interact with β-Klotho [9,10], thereby eliminating its ability to effectively signal to target tissues. Importantly, the incorporation of site-specific mutations around Pro171 eliminates the proteolytic processing of FGF21 at this site and markedly extends protein half-life [15]. These data suggest that a specific protease may be responsible for the proteolytic processing of FGF21, which, if identified, could potentially be targeted to increase endogenous levels of active FGF21.
In this issue of the Biochemical Journal, Zhen et al. [16] have identified fibroblast activation protein (FAP) as the protease responsible for the inactivation of circulating FGF21 through the C-terminal cleavage at Pro171. FAP is a serine protease, a member of a larger superfamily of serine hydrolases (>200 genes in humans) that contains a number of enzymes relevant to metabolic disease, including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) [17]. Like DPP-IV, FAP is a prolyl peptidase, and by sequence homology is most closely related to DPP-IV [18]. Using MS, the authors identified all of the sites of hFGF21 processing and reported that hFGF21 is cleaved after three proline residues at positions 2, 4 and 171 [16], consistent with previous reports [15,19]. Whereas cleavage at Pro171 inactivates FGF21, cleavage at Pro2 and Pro4 was shown previously not to impair FGF21 function [9,10]. To identify the protease(s) responsible for the proteolytic processing of FGF21, the authors noted that all cleavage events occurred after proline residues, suggesting prolyl peptidases may be involved. Using inhibitors for DPP-IV, the authors then discovered that DPP-IV was responsible for the cleavage of FGF21 at Pro2 and Pro4, but not Pro171 both in vitro and in vivo. Three additional prolyl peptidases were then obtained and evaluated on their ability to cleave FGF21. Notably, FAP, but not prolyl endopeptidase [PrEP, also called prolyl oligopeptidase (PrOP)] or lysosomal ProX carboxypeptidase (PrCP), rapidly cleaved hFGF21 at Pro171 [16].
Although FAP expression in healthy tissue is low [20], the authors reported that FAP also circulates in an active form in human and mouse plasma. Plasma FAP concentrations in normal, overweight and obese individuals varied approximately 5-fold between subjects with no correlation between FAP concentration and body mass index (BMI) being observed [16]. Despite the variation in plasma FAP levels, plasma FAP protein concentration correlated with prolyl endopeptidase activity, suggesting that circulating FAP is active. By using either a FAP-specific inhibitor or FAP immunodepletion from human plasma, the authors determined that proteolysis of hFGF21 at Pro171, but not Pro2 and Pro4, was completely abrogated when FAP activity is lost. In addition, whereas hFGF21 is effectively cleaved at Pro171 when spiked into plasma from wild-type mice, this effect was completely abolished when using plasma from FAP knockout mice [16]. Recently, another group, Dunshee et al. [21], supported these findings by demonstrating that recombinant FAP cleaves FGF21 at Pro171, that pharmacological inhibition of FAP prevents C-terminal cleavage of FGF21, and that genetic deletion of FAP in mice eliminates hFGF21 cleavage. In addition, Dunshee et al. [21] extended these findings by demonstrating the importance of FAP-mediated cleavage of FGF21 in vivo by administering a FAP-specific inhibitor to cynomolgus monkeys. Pharmacological inhibition of FAP in monkeys increased the level of intact endogenous FGF21 more than 3-fold. Together, these data demonstrate that FAP is responsible for the regulation of circulating FGF21 activity in vivo.
These two reports raise several interesting points regarding studies involving FGF21. First, it is well documented that plasma FGF21 levels are paradoxically elevated in insulin resistant and obese human and animal models [1]. Although tissues may also be resistant to FGF21 under these conditions, these data reinforce the concept that a significant percentage of total circulating FGF21 is not active [22]. Therefore, observed elevations in human plasma FGF21 levels, typically determined by ELISAs recognizing total FGF21 protein levels, do not necessarily reflect the amount of active FGF21 present in the circulation. To accurately assess FGF21 function, both total and active FGF21 levels should be measured in models of disease or in human studies attributing beneficial effects to increased FGF21 levels. However, Dunshee et al. [21] found that two ELISAs commonly used to assess total FGF21 levels actually detect intact FGF21 with better efficiency than the C-terminally truncated form, suggesting these ELISAs may underestimate total levels of FGF21 in circulation. Therefore, the development of ELISAs which can accurately quantify and discriminate total compared with active FGF21 are needed.
Secondly, both studies also determined that, whereas hFGF21 is cleaved and processed by FAP, mouse FGF21 is not [16,21]. Since FAP has a stringent Gly-Pro sequence requirement [18,23], and since mouse FGF21 has a glutamate residue at the corresponding glycine residue at position 170, mouse FGF21 is resistant to FAP cleavage [16,21]. Therefore, caution should be taken when comparing the physiological regulation of FGF21 in rodent studies to human physiology as the half-lives of intact, endogenous FGF21 may differ. And finally, as noted by Zhen et al. [16],FAP and DPP-IV are closely related and share similarity in their active site. Inhibition of DPP-IV has therapeutic benefits by reducing glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) degradation and since FAP could be inhibited to reduce FGF21 inactivation, a dual DPP-IV/FAP inhibitor could be utilized or developed to treat metabolic disease. Interestingly, the approved DPP-IV inhibitor linagliptin also inhibits FAP activity (IC50 = 89 nM for FAP and IC50 = 1 nM for DPP-IV) [24], suggesting that higher doses of linagliptin, which appear to be safely tolerated [25], could be utilized to simultaneously elevate circulating active GLP-1 and FGF21 with a single orally available small molecule. The work by Zhen et al. [16] and Dunshee et al. [21] represent a key step in the development of small-molecule compounds to increase circulating levels of active FGF21, offering a potential therapeutic alternative to recombinant protein injection to augment FGF21 activity in vivo.
Acknowledgments
FUNDING
This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (to M.P.G.); the Lundbeck Foundation (to M.P.G.); and the Danish Research Council (to M.P.G.); the American Diabetes Association Junior Faculty Award [grant number 7-13-JF-49 (to M.J.P.)]; the Edward Mallinckrodt Jr Foundation Grant (to M.J.P.); and the National Institutes of Health [grant number R01DK106104 (to M.J.P)]. M.J.P acknowledges generous research support from the Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center.
Abbreviations:
- DPP-IV
dipeptidyl peptidase IV
- FAP
fibroblast activation protein
- FGF21
fibroblast growth factor 21
- FGFR1
fibroblast growth factor receptor 1
- GLP-1
glucagon-like peptide-1
- hFGF21
human FGF21
REFERENCES
- 1.Markan KR and Potthoff MJ (2015) Metabolic fibroblast growth factors (FGFs): mediators of energy homeostasis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gaich G, Chien JY, Fu H, Leonard GC, Deeg MA, Holland WL, Kharitonenkov A, BumoI T, Schilske HK and Moller DE (2013) The effects of LY2405319, an FGF21 analog, in obese human subjects with type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 18, 333–340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dong JQ, Rossulek M, Somayaji VR, Baltrukonis D, Liang Y, Hudson K, Hernandez-Illas M and Calle RA (2015) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PF-05231023, a novel long-acting FGF21 mimetic, in a first-in-human study. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 80, 1051–1063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Potthoff MJ, Inagaki T, Satapati S, Ding X, He T, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Finck BN, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA and Burgess SC (2009) FGF21 induces PGC-1alpha and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 106, 10853–10858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Badman MK, Pissios P, Kennedy AR, Koukos G, Flier JS and Maratos-Flier E (2007) Hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 is regulated by PPARalpha and is a key mediator of hepatic lipid metabolism in ketotic states. Cell Metab. 5, 426–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Markan KR, Naber MC, Ameka MK, Anderegg MD, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, Mohammadi M and Potthoff MJ (2014) Circulating FGF21 is liver derived and enhances glucose uptake during refeeding and overfeeding. Diabetes 63, 4057–4063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.von Holstein-Rathlou S, BonDurant LD, Peltekian L, Naber MC, Yin TC, Claflin KE, Urizar AI, Madsen AN, Ratner C, Holst B et al. (2016) FGF21 mediates endocrine control of simple sugar intake and sweet taste preference by the liver. Cell Metab. 23, 335–343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fon Tacer K, Bookout AL, Ding X, Kurosu H, John GB, Wang L, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Kuro-o M, Mangelsdorf DJ and Kliewer SA (2010) Research resource: comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol. Endocrinol 24, 2050–2064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Micanovic R, Raches DW, Dunbar JD, Driver DA, Bina HA, Dickinson CD and Kharitonenkov A (2009) Different roles of N- and C- termini in the functional activity of FGF21. J. Cell. Physiol 219, 227–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yie J, Hecht R, Patel J, Stevens J, Wang W, Hawkins N, Steavenson S, Smith S, Winters D, Fisher S et al. (2009) FGF21 N- and C-termini play different roles in receptor interaction and activation. FEBS Lett. 583, 19–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kharitonenkov A, Wroblewski VJ, Koester A, Chen YF, Clutinger CK, Tigno XT, Hansen BC, Shanafelt AB and Etgen GJ (2007) The metabolic state of diabetic monkeys is regulated by fibroblast growth factor-21. Endocrinology 148, 774–781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu J, Stanislaus S, Chinookoswong N, Lau YY, Hager T, Patel J, Ge H, Weiszmann J, Lu SC, Graham M et al. (2009) Acute glucose-lowering and insulin-sensitizing action of FGF21 in insulin-resistant mouse models-association with liver and adipose tissue effects. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 297, E1105–E1114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang J, Ishino T, Chen G, Rolzin P, Osothprarop TF, Retting K, Li L, Jin P, Matin MJ, Huyghe B et al. (2013) Development of a novel long-acting antidiabetic FGF21 mimetic by targeted conjugation to a scaffold antibody. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 346, 270–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hager T, Spahr C, Xu J, Salimi-Moosavi H and Hall M (2013) Differential enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and ligand-binding mass spectrometry for analysis of biotransformation of protein therapeutics: application to various FGF21 modalities. Anal. Chem 85, 2731–2738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hecht R, Li YS, Sun J, Belouski E, Hall M, Hager T, Yie J, Wang W, Winters D, Smith S et al. (2012) Rationale-based engineering of a potent long-acting FGF21 analog for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 7, e49345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhen EY, Jin Z, Ackermann BL, Thomas MK and Gutierrez JA (2016) Circulating FGF21 proteolytic processing mediated by fibroblast activation protein. Biochem. J 473, 605–614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bachovchin DA and Cravatt BF (2012) The pharmacological landscape and therapeutic potential of serine hydrolases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 11, 52–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee KN, Jackson KW, Terzyan S, Christiansen VJ and McKee PA (2009) Using substrate specificity of antiplasmin-cleaving enzyme for fibroblast activation protein inhibitor design. Biochemistry 48, 5149–5158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kharitonenkov A, Beals JM, Micanovic R, Strifler BA, Rathnachalam R, Wroblewski VJ, Li S, Koester A, Ford AM, Coskun T et al. (2013) Rational design of a fibroblast growth factor 21-based clinical candidate, LY2405319. PLoS One 8, e58575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Niedermeyer J, Garin-Chesa P, Kriz M, Hilberg F, Mueller E, Bamberger U, Rettig WJ and Schnapp A (2001) Expression of the fibroblast activation protein during mouse embryo development. Int. J. Dev. Biol 45, 445–447 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dunshee DR, Brainbridge TW, Kaljavin NM, Zavala-Solorio J, Schroeder AC, Chan R, Corpuz R, Wong M, Zhou W, Deshmukh G et al. (2016) Fibroblast activation protein cleaves and inactivates fibroblast growth factor 21. J. Biol. Chem, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.710582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Umberger TS, Sloan JH, Chen J, Cheng C, Siegel RW, Qian Y, Troutt JS and Konrad RJ (2014) Novel sandwich immunoassays for the measurement of total and active FGF21. Bioanalysis 6, 3283–3293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edosada CY, Quan C, Tran T, Pham V, Wiesmann C, Fairbrother W and Wolf BB (2006) Peptide substrate profiling defines fibroblast activation protein as an endopeptidase of strict Gly(2)-Pro(1)-cleaving specificity. FEBS Lett. 580, 1581–1586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sortino MA, Sinagra T and Canonico PL (2013) Linagliptin: a thorough characterization beyond its clinical efficacy. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 4, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ring A, Port A, Graefe-Mody EU, Revollo I, lovino M and Dugi KA (2011) The DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin does not prolong the QT interval at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 72, 39–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]