Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Dec 9;212:105491. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105491

Impact of aerosols on surface ozone during COVID-19 pandemic in southern India: A multi-instrumental approach from ground and satellite observations, and model simulations

Raja Obul Reddy Kalluri 1, Balakrishnaiah Gugamsetty 1, Chakradhar Rao Tandule 1, Rama Gopal Kotalo 1,∗, Lokeswara Reddy Thotli 1, Ramakrishna Reddy Rajuru 1, Surya Nagi Reddy Palle 1
PMCID: PMC7724289  PMID: 33318726

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic due to its widespread global infection. This has resulted in lockdown under different phases in many nations, including India, around the globe. In the present study, we report the impact of aerosols on surface ozone in the context of pre-lockdown (01st - 24th March 2020 (PLD)), lockdown phase1 (25th March to 14th April 2020 (LDP1)), and lockdown phase 2 (15th April to 03rd May 2020 (LDP2)) on clear days at a semi-arid site, Anantapur in southern India using both in situ observations and model simulations. Collocated measurements of surface ozone (O3), aerosol optical depth (AOD), black carbon mass concentration (BC), total columnar ozone (TCO), solar radiation (SR), and ultraviolet radiation (UV-A) data were collected using an Ozone analyzer, MICROTOPS sunphotometer, Ozonometer, Aethalometer, and net radiometer during the study period. The diurnal variations of O3 and BC exhibited an opposite trend during three phases. The concentrations of ozone were ~10.7% higher during LDP1 (44.8 ± 5.2 ppbv) than the PLD (40.5 ± 6.0 ppbv), which mainly due to an unprecedented reduction in NOx emissions leading to a lower O3 titration by NO. The prominent increase in the surface zone during LDP1 is reasonably consistent with the observed photolysis frequencies (j (O1D)) through Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible (TUV) model. The results show that a pronounced spectral and temporal variability in the AOD during three lockdown phases is mainly due to distinct aerosol sources. The increase in AOD during LDP2 due to long-range transport can bring large amounts of mineral dust and smoke aerosols from the west Asian region and central India, and which is reasonably consistent with the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) air mass back trajectories and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fire counts analysis over the measurement location. Overall, a drastic reduction in BC concentration (~8.4%) and AOD (10.8%) were observed in the semi-arid area during LDP1 with correspondence to PLD. The columnar aerosol size distributions retrieved from the spectral AODs followed power-law plus unimodal during three phases. The absorption angstrom exponent (AAE) analysis reveals a predominant contribution to the BC from biomass burning activities during the lockdown period over the measurement location.

Keywords: Surface ozone, Aerosol optical depth, HYSPLIT, Semi-arid

1. Introduction

The Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease initially recognized in Wuhan, Hubei Province of China, late in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) announced COVID-19 as a pandemic due to widespread global infection (WHO, 2020). The number of people globally infected by COVID-19 was around 37.6 million cases and 1.1 million deaths as of October 12, 2020 (WHO, 2020). This has resulted in lockdown under different phases in many of the nations around the globe. To control the rapid spread of the pandemic, the Indian government has imposed a strict lockdown for more than two months in different phases to control the pandemic. Therefore, the lockdown affected transportation, restricted construction and industrial activities, leading to plummeting air pollutants. Jain and Sharma (2020) reported that the concentration of PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and CO declined by ~41%, ~52%, ~51%, and ~28% during the lockdown phase in comparison to the before lockdown in Delhi, respectively. Sharma et al. (2020) reported that around 43%, 31%, 10%, and 18% decreased in PM2.5, PM10, CO, and NO2 in India was observed during the lockdown period compared to previous years. Kanniah et al. (2020) mentioned that the restricted industrial activities and vehicular emissions during the lockdown period resulted in a significant decrease of AOD and tropospheric NO2 over the East Asian region. Filonchyk et al. (2020a) documented a significant decrease of CO and NO2 (20% and 30%) concentration during the COVID -19 period compared to the same period after Lunar New Year 2019 over East China. Earlier studies mostly focused on particulate matter, trace gases based on satellite observations (e.g., Mahato et al., 2020; Nakada and Urban, 2020; Sicard et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). However, a better understanding of aerosols can contribute to the adoption of effective measures to reduce air pollution, and real-time monitoring data are essential to obtain detailed variations during the lockdown period better.

Atmospheric aerosols made significant contributions to the Earth's climate system and human health (Ramanathan et al., 2001; Martin et al., 2003; Zhao et al., 2006a,b; IPCC, 2013; Kalluri et al., 2019). The primary sources of air pollution are combustion from vehicles, power generation plants, landfill sites, and unsustainable farming. The uncertainty of aerosols impact on surface ozone (O3) mainly depends on the optical properties of regional aerosols, chemical composition, production, and loss rates (Meloni et al., 2003; Badarinath et al., 2008; Li et al., 2011). In the troposphere, ozone is formed photochemically by the oxidation of carbon monoxide, methane, non-methane hydrocarbons, and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sufficient solar radiation (Jenkin and Clemitshaw 2000; Badarinath et al., 2008; Gopal et al., 2014b; Lingaswamy et al., 2017).

Anantapur represents a semi-arid continental region of Andhra Pradesh, India. It has geographically situated on the boundary of a semi-arid and rain shadow region. A small scale Industrial and vehicular emissions, forest fires, agricultural and biomass burning constitute significant sources of local anthropogenic aerosols; aerosols from both local and long-range transport constitute significant sources of natural aerosols (Gopal et al., 2015, 2016; Kalluri et al., 2020). The nationwide lockdown during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, industrial, construction, and transportation activities is mostly absent over Anantapur. Therefore, a quantitative assessment of air pollution was necessary to limit air quality, mostly when such alternative control measures were necessary. The measurements were taken only on clear sky days at Anantapur using both in situ observations. The lockdown phases included in the present study are namely pre-lockdown (01st March to 24th March 2020) henceforth termed as PLD; lockdown phase1 (LDP1) from 25th March to 14th April 2020; lockdown phase 2 (LDP2) from 15th April to 03rd May 2020. The number of the dataset for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2 consisted of 8, 7, and 4 days, respectively.

The main objectives addressed in this paper are a) To investigate the diurnal variability in surface ozone, black carbon mass concentration, solar radiation, and UV-A radiation on clear sky days under different phases b) The spatial and temporal distribution of aerosol optical depth (AOD), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations during three lockdown phases c) The columnar size distribution (CSD) function inferred by numerical inversion of spectral AOD. Finally, we evaluated the impact of AOD on photolysis frequencies (j (O1D) using the Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible radiation model over the measurement location.

2. Site description

The collocated measurements of AOD, TCO, O3, BC, incoming solar radiation (SR), and UV-A radiation has carried out from the roof of a building in the Department of Physics, Sri Krishnadevaraya University (SKU, 14.62° N, 77.65° E, 331 m asl), situated away of 12 km from Anantapur town (Fig. 1 ). Geographically, Anantapur has located on the boundary of a semi-arid and rain shadow region in the southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Moreover, the measurement location is situated just beside national highways NH44 and 7 km away from NH42. The average rainfall over measurement location is about 350 mm during the southwest monsoon, which contributes more than 60–70% to the total annual rainfall, and the rest of the rainfall has contributed by the northeast monsoon period (Reddy et al., 2016; Hussain et al., 2018).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Location map of (top panel) the Sri Krishnadevaraya University campus area in Anantapur (bottom panel) satellite aerial view of monitoring site building in the SKU campus indicated with an arrow head.

3. Instrumentation

3.1. In-situ measurements

3.1.1. Surface ozone

Surface ozone (O3) concentrations continuously have been carried out using on-line analyzers (Model: 49i for O3, Thermo Scientific, USA) during the measurement period. The ozone monitoring instrument uses the UV photometry technique (Huntzicker and Johnson, 1979). Ultraviolet light at a wavelength of 253.84 nm has been used as a light source where ozone has strong absorption. The O3 analyzer was zero calibrated with dry air, and span calibration of the O3 analyzer has carried out using a multi-point internally assembled O3 generator. The lowest detection limit of the analyzer is 0.5 ppbv, and the response time is the 20s.

3.1.2. Microtops II sunphotometer and ozonemeter

The spectral AOD at five distinct narrow-band spectral wavelengths (ranging from Far UV to Near IR), total columnar ozone (TCO), and columnar water vapor content (WV) were retrieved from Microtops II handheld sun photometer and ozonometer manufactured by the Solar Light Company Inc., USA. Microtops II sun photometer estimates the integrated columnar spectral AOD and WV by measuring direct solar irradiance at 380, 500, 870, 936, and 1020 nm through optical collimators with a full field view of 2.5°(Morys et al., 2001). More details about principle, measurement techniques, calibrations, limitations have been given elsewhere (Ichoku et al., 2002; Kumar et al., 2010; Gopal et al., 2015). The description of columnar size distribution has been given in the Supplementary Material Section (SM) S1.

3.1.3. Black carbon mass concentration

The BC mass concentration was obtained from the seven-channel (370, 470, 520, 590, 660, 880, and 950 nm) Aethalometer (Model AE-42 of Magee Scientific, California, USA) by operating at 4 LPM of flow rate with the recording time base of 3 min interval. The Aethalometer is working on the principle of optical transmission (Hansen et al., 1984). The uncertainties in the aethalometer technique arise from multiple scattering effects in quartz filter tape and shadowing/loading effects. Weingartner et al. (2003) suggested a correction factor of 2.14 for multiple scattering corrections that vary with different aerosol types, and the shadowing/loading factor R is significant for pure soot particles and almost negligible for mixed aerosols. More details about measurement principles, data analysis, correction schemes were described in several earlier studies by Arnott et al. (2005); Virkkula et al. (2007); Weingartner et al. (2003); and hence not discussed more here.

The absorption coefficient (σabs) and absorption angstrom exponent (αap) can be calculated as

σabs=(BC)∗14625∗10−3λ∗C∗RMm−1 (1)
αap=Δlog(σabs)Δlog(λ) (2)

3.1.4. Radiation measurements

The UV-A radiation has been measured by using a precision UV-A radiometer (MS-212 A) with high reliability. It works using the Ultra Violet Selective filter detection principle and provides 30-min interval data (Lokeswara Reddy et al., 2020). The combination of a well-designed GaAsP photodiode and UV-A filter promises high performance to measure the UV-A between the wavelengths of 315–400 nm. The incoming shortwave solar radiation (SR) was measured using the DeltaOHM LPNET14 pyranometer. The pyranometer produces a millivolt analog signal that is directly proportional to the irradiance be measured.

3.2. Satellite retrieved tropospheric and columnar NO2 and aerosol optical depth

The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) sensor aboard the Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite provides daily global measurements of tropospheric NO2 and Columnar NO2 (Krotkov et al., 2017). The satellite follows a sun-synchronous orbit, passing over each location at ~13:30 local time (Bechle et al., 2013). In the present study, We used the OMI Level-3 daily global gridded (0.25 × 0.25°) Nitrogen Dioxide Product (OMNO2d v003) with 30% Cloud Screened obtained from Giovanni (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/) (GES DISC Dataset, 2019; Krotkov et al., 2017). The NO2 data product was selected in the grid between 77 and 78⸰ E and 14–15⸰ N during three episodes over the study region. The spatial distribution of AOD (at 550 nm) has been obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite. We used daily observations of AOD from both MODIS Terra (MOD08_D3) and Aqua (MYD08_D3) collection 6.1 Level 3 product during three episodes (Levy et al., 2013). The detection of heavy smoke was introduced in Collection 6.1 compared with Collection 6 (Filonchyk et al., 2020b). In the present study, we have used a combined Dark Target (DT) Deep Blue (DB) AOD at 550 nm, which takes advantage of both dark target (Levy et al., 2013) and deep blue (Hsu et al., 2013) algorithms.

3.3. MODIS fire counts and air mass back-trajectory analysis for source apportionment

To identify the aerosol long-range transport process, we retrieved the MODIS fire-count data and 5-day backward trajectories obtained from the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model (Draxler and Rolph, 2003). The MODIS (4 mm and 11 mm channels) provides the fire count information based on brightness temperature algorithm and algorithm distinguish fire pixels into three categories: low confidence (0–30%), nominal confidence (30–80%), and high confidence (>80%). In the present study, data with high confidence (>80%) were considered.

3.4. TUV model

Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible radiation model (TUV) version 5.3 was used to estimate the photolysis frequencies (j (O1D) during the three lockdown phases examined in this study (Madronich, 1993). The model was designed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR, United States), and which uses the discrete-ordinate algorithm (DISORT)with four streams and estimates the actinic flux spectra with a wavelength range of 280–420 nm in 1 nm steps and resolution. The AOD, Single Scattering Albedo (SSA), Angstrom exponent (AE), and altitude were required to test aerosol influence on photolysis rates. In the present study, based on the geographical region and air mass trajectory types, we have chosen five aerosol types available from Hess et al. (1998) for new aerosol mixtures and estimated AOD values. The estimated AOD is well-matched with the real-time AOD and estimated required SSA. The J-value impact factor (JIF) is defined as the observed photolysis frequencies ratio to the photolysis frequencies at AOD equal to 0 (Flynn et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2019). Generally, the JIF values less than 1 indicate that the aerosols decrease the photolysis frequencies.

4. Results and discussion

4.1. Diurnal variability in solar radiation, UV-A, surface ozone, and black carbon mass concentration

Fig. 2a-d examines the diurnal variability in SR, UV-A, O3, and BC mass concentration for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2. The diurnal variation of SR (UV-A) shows increased from morning hours onwards and reached a peak value during afternoon hours and again starts to decrease till evening hours (Fig. 2a and b). The diurnal variation in both O3 and BC trends shows oppositely and exhibits an obvious variability in three phases. Even though LDP1 O3 is systematically higher than other phases, they exhibit a similar diurnal pattern of O3 was observed. The concentrations of ozone were ~10.7% higher during LDP1 (44.8 ± 5.2 ppbv) than the PLD (40.5 ± 6.0 ppbv). The concentrations of O3 generally increased during the LDP1, possibly because lower fine particle loadings led to less scavenging of HO2 and, as a result, greater O3 production. These results illustrate the importance of reactions between gaseous and particulate pollutants, but clearly, lowering the NOx emissions and VOCs will be needed to control O3. Lal et al. (2000) reported daytime change in the O3 level is mainly depends on the solar intensity, anthropogenic photochemical reactions, and meteorological conditions. The diurnal BC showed two peaks, one peak in the morning (07:00–08:00 LT) and the other in the evening (20:00–22:00 LT), while the morning peak is predominant than the evening peak (Fig. 2d). During PLD, vehicular emissions were relatively high, and the observed magnitude of the morning peak was high. However, during the lockdown days, the morning peak was considerably low due to the absence of transport sectors. On the lockdown days, the agricultural emissions were considerably higher, and the observed magnitude of the evening peak was reasonably high, whereas, on pre-lockdown days, the peak was relatively lower than lockdown days. Several villages are located to the south at the distance of 0.5 km over the measurement location, and in April month, it suffers maximum advection of agriculture and waste burning. The relatively lower BC observed in LDP1, and LDP2 indicate that the strict implementation of the lockdown in this area turned to be effective in decreasing the BC over Anantapur.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Diurnal variation of (a) Solar radiation (b) UV-A radiation (c) Black carbon mass concentration (d) Surface ozone for PLD, LDP1 and LDP2.

To understand aerosols impact on j (O1D), we performed the TUV model for three different atmospheric conditions, i.e., PLD, LDP1, and LDP2. Fig. 3 (a–d) illustrates the situ measured O3, AOD, TUV model estimated photolysis frequencies (j (O1D)), and JIF values at 14:00 IST for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2. The maximum O3 concentration was observed in the day time (14:00 IST) about 57.4 ± 5.0, 59.4 ± 6.7, 55.4 ± 2.9 ppbv for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2, respectively (Fig. 3a). The corresponding photolysis frequencies were about 3.24 × 10−5, 3.36 × 10−5, 3.1 × 10−5 s−1, respectively (Fig. 3c). Fig. 3b shows that surface ozone increasing was around 3.4% when AOD decreased from 0.49 to 0.44, indicates that the reduction of ozone due to aerosol is larger with the increase of aerosol concentrations. The estimated JIF values for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2 were about 0.77, 0.81, and 0.76, confirming that aerosols strongly impact photolysis frequencies during the study period (Fig. 3). Sharma et al. (2020) revealed that the surface ozone was increased by about 17% during the lockdown period compared to previous years over 22 major cities in India. Jain and Sharma (2020) revealed that the surface ozone was increased by about ~7% and ~3% during the lockdown phase than the pre lockdown in Chennai and Bangalore, respectively. A significant enhancement in O3 concentration was observed from pre-lockdown days to triple-lockdown by 22% over Kannur (Resmi et al., 2020). Li et al. (2011) reported that the changes in photolysis rates concern atmospheric aerosols accounted for 2–17% surface ozone reduction over Mexico City. Gharibzadeh et al. (2021) reported a decrease in ozone concentration on dusty days due to a significant decrease in photolysis rates; thus, the depletion of ozone occurred. Dickerson et al. (1997) concluded that absorbing aerosols significant reduces the O3 mixing ratios approximately 24 ppbv than the other aerosol types. Li et al. (2005) found that absorbing aerosols resulted in a 5–20% decrease in surface O3 production in the Houston area. Wang et al. (2019) reported that aerosols cause a significant decrease in j (O1D) by 27% and 33% compared to an aerosol-free atmosphere (AOD = 0) for summer winter, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Day time (14:00 IST) variation of (a) Surface ozone (b) Aerosol optical depth (c) Dependence of j (O1D) on AOD (d) J-value impact factor for PLD, LDP1 and LDP2.

4.2. Spatial and temporal distributions in trace gases and aerosols

To study the effect of lockdown on aerosols and trace gases, we analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution of AOD (550 nm) and NO2 over the measurement location. Fig. 4 shows the spatial distribution of AOD and tropospheric NO2 during PLD, LDP1, and LDP2 over Southern India. The color bar in the figure represents the AOD/NO2, and the marked symbol ‘circle’ in red color indicates the observation site. Large concentrations of aerosol (>0.30) are observed over Anantapur during PLD. During the LDP1, a significant reduction of AOD (<0.25) was observed; however, enhancement in the aerosol concentration (>0.30) was observed during LDP2. The measurement location has mainly surrounded by farmers who undertake several agricultural activities; however, the back trajectories revealed that the aerosols originated from the Northwest region also contributes to this location (Gopal et al., 2014a, 2017, 2017; Kalluri et al., 2016, 2017). Meanwhile, tropospheric NO2 showed the highest (>15 × 1014 mol/cm2) during PLD and gradually decreases to a minimum of <15 × 1014 mol/cm2 during the lockdown period.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Spatial distribution of aerosol optical depth and tropospheric NO2 during the PLD, LDP1 and LDP2.

Fig. 5a-f shows the daily variability in O3, BC mass concentration, TCO, WV, and satellite retrieved tropospheric and columnar NO2 for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2 over the measurement location. The results showed distinct variations that occurred during PLD, LDP1, and LDP2. For example, O3 (TCO) ranges from 30.3 to 43.7 ppbv (252-263DU), with a mean, were about 38.9 ± 5.32 ppbv (259±4DU) during PLD. The corresponding mean for LDP1 and LDP2 were about 44.6 ± 3.4 ppbv (266 ± 8 DU) and 36.5 ± 3.0 ppbv (261±3DU), with a relative change of 14.7% (2.4%) and −6.0% (0.7%) is observed than PLD (Fig. 5a,d).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Temporal variation of (a) Near-surface ozone (b) Tropospheric NO2 (c) Black carbon (d) Columnar ozone (e) Columnar NO2 (f) Water vapor for three phases.

However, the mean concentrations of tropospheric NO2 (columnar NO2) during PLD, LDP1, and LDP2 days have noticed about 1.72 × 1015 (3.81 × 1015), 1.20 × 1015 (3.25 × 1015), and 1.0 × 1015 mol/cm2 (3.26 × 1015 mol/cm2), and which showed a decrease by 36% (14.5%) from pre-lockdown days to lockdown days (Fig. 5b,e). The BC was decreased from 1.51 ± 0.27 μg/m3 before lockdown to 1.30 ± 0.09 μg/m3 after lockdown, and a relative change of −13.4% was observed (Fig. 5c). During the lockdown period, the O3 lapse rate due to the titration of NO might be less than its photochemical production from its precursors, and this may be the primary reason for the enhancement in O3 observed.

4.3. Spectral variation of aerosol optical depth and absorption coefficient

Fig. 6a-d examines the spectral variation of AOD, absorption coefficient, and temporal variation of AE and absorption angstrom exponent (AAE) for PLD, LDP1, LDP2 over Anantapur. Importantly, the higher AODs occurred in lower wavelengths, and the lower AODs are common in higher wavelengths. The mean AOD values at 380 nm were about 0.48 ± 0.09, 0.44 ± 0.1, 0.55 ± 0.08 for PLD, LDP1 and LDP2, respectively, while the corresponding values at 1020 nm are 0.15 ± 0.03, 0.11 ± 0.02 and 0.20 ± 0.06, respectively (Fig. 6a). During LDP2, the magnitude of AOD was observed relatively higher at near-IR regions due to the predominance of coarse mode scattering particles (mineral dust), and which is fairly consistent with the high mass loading and size distribution observed in LDP2. The low AOD values were observed during LDP1 due to small scale industries shutdown near the measurement location. However, the long-range transport can bring large amounts of mineral dust aerosols and smoke particles from west Asian and central India to the site and are responsible for increasing AOD during LDP2 over the site (Fig. 8 ). It is also clearly demonstrated from Fig. 6b that the absorption coefficient decreases with the increase in wavelength during three phases. This study shows that strong absorbing aerosols may lead to high absorption at shorter wavelengths, which is more pronounced during PLD than other phases. An obvious variation of AE and AAE can be seen during three episodes. The mean values of AAE were about 1.30 ± 0.07, 1.39 ± 0.08, and 1.46 ± 0.02, during PLD, LDP1, and LDP2, respectively (Fig. 6c). The AE corresponding mean values were about 1.34 ± 0.08, 1.25 ± 0.08, and 1.14 ± 0.12, respectively (Fig. 6d). The presence of dust is indicated by the fact that the high AOD corresponds to the low AE during LDP2. The AAE<1.0 corresponds to non-absorptive components while the group 1.0 < AAE≤1.1 is attributed to the presence of BC-rich aerosols in the atmosphere from the fossil fuel burning process (Liu et al., 2018a,b). On the other hand, AAE lies between 1.1 < AAE≤1.3 represents mixed carbonaceous aerosols emitted from both fossil fuel and biomass burning activities over the observational site. Further, the remaining group via., AAE>1.3, can be attributed to biomass burning emitted BC aerosols. At the observation site, the magnitude of AAE (1.1 < AAE≤1.3) revealed that the mixed carbonaceous type of aerosols during PLD emitted from both fossil fuel and biomass burning activities. In contrast, the values of AAE>1.3 during LDP1 and LDP2 were attributed to the BC from biomass burning activities processes over the measurement location.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Spectral variation and temporal variations of (a) aerosol optical depth (b) absorption coefficient (c) Angstrom exponent (d) Absorption angstrom exponent for three phases.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

The HYSPLIT air-mass back trajectories merged with MODIS fire count analysis during LDP2 over the measurement location.

4.4. Columnar aerosol size distributions and derived parameters

Fig. 7 illustrated the columnar size distributions and derived parameters (R eff, mL, NT, and Nc/Na) in different phases over the measurement location. The CSD derived from the obtained AOD spectra over Anantapur is consistently followed by power law + unimodal during three episodes. It indicates that distinct sources availability in all phases. The value of Reff generally depends on the relative contribution of coarse to fine particles, while the value of mL depends on both total aerosols and the concentration of the coarse mode particles (Moorthy and Satheesh, 2000). From the interdependency of mL and Reff, it is evident that the lower values of Reff and mL during LDP1 are associated with the decrease in the total concentration. High mass loading (118 mg m−2) and effective radius (0.19 μm) occurred during LDP2 and are attributed to a significant abundance of coarse (natural) aerosols. The Nc were 7.51 × 109, 5.18 × 109, 9.77 × 109 during PLD, LDP1, and LDP2, respectively. The (Nc/Na) values were about 1.50 × 10−3, 1.08 × 10−3, and 1.83 × 10−3 for PLD, LDP1, and LDP2. Na, Nc, and Nc/Na values were observed minimum during LDP1 and reached a maximum during LDP2. The NC and Na showed a significant decrease in LDP1 compared to the PLD due to the immediate shutdown of small-scale industries, including cement plants, lime kilns, slab polishing, stone crushing, and brick-making industries. However, The Na and NC in LDP2 are higher than that in PLD and LDP1, which most likely biomass burning fires dominate, generating finer mode particles and long-range transported dust. An increase in Nc/Na ratio indicates the coarse mode aerosols dominance in the size spectrum during LDP2 compared to the LDP1, and it is considered responsible for flattening the AOD spectrum (Dumka et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009). Fig. 8 illustrates the fire counts merged with back trajectories during the LDP2. During LDP2, the potential source field of absorbing aerosol, as identified through fire count analysis, significant biomass burning activities, and vast agricultural fields in central India, appeared as a red dot. The air masses generally originate northwesterly and pass over central India before reaching the observation site during LDP2.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Variation of the aerosol columnar size distribution and retrieved parameters Reff, Nc/Na, mL, Na and Nc from the columnar size distributions for three phases.

5. Conclusion

The study explains aerosols impact on ozone production during the COVID-19 pandemic period on all clear sky days. The essential findings derived from the results are summarized below. The concentrations of ozone were ~10.7% higher during LDP1 (44.8 ± 5.2 ppbv) than the PLD (40.5 ± 6.0 ppbv). Overall, a drastic reduction in BC concentration (~8.4%) and AOD (10.8%) were observed during LDP1 than PLD over the measurement location. The AAE analysis reveals a predominant contribution to the BC by agricultural activities during the lockdown period over the measurement location. Long-range transported dust and agricultural activities are most likely the main factor causing high AOD during LDP2 over the measurement location. Based on this finding, it can be indicated that agricultural burning and long-range transport dust is also an essential factor leading to high AOD in LDP2.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Indian Space Research Organization Bangalore for their financial support under the ISRO-GBP (AT-CTM & ARFI) project. We acknowledge the ISRO-GBP (NOBLE) project for providing the solar radiation data. We also want to express gratitude to NASA for providing MODIS and OMI data.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105491.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (24.8KB, docx)

References

  1. Arnott W.P., Hamasha K., Moosmuller H., Sheridan P.J., Ogren J.A. Towards aerosol light-absorption measurements with a 7-wavelength aethalometer: evaluation with a photoacoustic instrument and 3-wavelength nephelometer. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:17–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Badarinath K.V.S., Kharol S.K., Krishan Prasad V. Influence of natural and anthropogenic activities on UV index variations-a study over tropical urban region using ground based observations and satellite data. J. Atmos. Chem. 2008;59:219–236. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bechle M.J., Millet D.B., Marshall J.D. Remote sensing of exposure to NO2: satellite versus ground-based measurement in a large urban area. Atmos. Environ. 2013;69:345–353. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dickerson R., Kondragunta S., Stenchikov G., Civerolo K., Doddridge B., Holben B. The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and photochemical smog. Science. 1997;278(5339):827–830. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Draxler R.R., Rolph G.D. Access via NOAA ARL READY Website. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory; Silver Spring, MD: 2003. HYSPLIT (Hybrid single-particle Lagrangian inte- grated trajectory) model.http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html accessed on 08.15.08. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dumka U.C., Moorthy K. Krishna, Satheesh S.K., Sagar R., Pant P. Short-period modulations in aerosol optical depths over central himalayas: role of mesoscale processes. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 2008;47:1467–1475. [Google Scholar]
  7. Filonchyk M., Hurynovich V. Validation of MODIS aerosol products with AERONET measurements of different land cover types in areas over eastern europe and China. J. Geovisua. Spat. Anal. 2020;4(10):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Filonchyk M., Hurynovich, V Yan H., Gusev A., Natallia Shpilevskaya N. Impact assessment of COVID-19 on variations of SO2, NO2, CO and AOD over East China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020;20:1530–1540. [Google Scholar]
  9. Flynn, J., Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B., Leuchner, M., Perna, R., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Anderson, C., Stutz, J., Brune, W., and Ren, X.R., Impact of clouds and aerosols on ozone production in Southeast Texas. Atmos. Environ., 44, 4126–4133.
  10. GES DISC Dataset . 2019. OMI/Aura NO2 Cloud-Screened Total and Tropospheric Column L3 Global Gridded 0.25 Degree X 0.25 Degree V3.https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/OMNO2d-003/summary (OMNO2d 003) [WWW Document]. URL. accessed 8.4.20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gharibzadeh M., Bidokhti A.A., Alam K. The interaction of ozone and aerosol in a semi-arid region in the Middle East: ozone formation and radiative forcing implications. Atmos. Environ. 2021;245:118015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gopal K.R., Arafath S.Md, Lingaswamy A.P., Balakrishnaiah G., PavanKumari S., Uma Devi K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., Raja Obul Reddy K., Penchal Reddy M., Reddy R.R., Suresh Babu S. In-situ measurements of atmospheric aerosols by using Integrating Nephelometer over a semi-arid station, southern India. Atmos. Environ. 2014;86:228–240. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gopal R.K., Lingaswamy A.P., Arafath S.M., Balakrishnaiah G., Pavan Kumari S., Uma Devi K., Lal S. Seasonal heterogeneity in ozone and its precursors (NOx) by in-situ and model observations on semi-arid station in Anantapur (A.P), South India. Atmos. Environ. 2014;84:294–306. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gopal K.R., Arafath S.M., Balakrishnaiah G., Raja Obul Reddy K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., Lingaswamy A.P., Pavan Kumari S., Uma Devi K., Reddy R.R., Suresh Babu S. Columnar-integrated aerosol optical properties and classification of different aerosol types over the semi-arid region, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh. Sci. Total Environ. 2015;527–528:507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gopal R.K., Reddy O.R.K., Balakrishnaiah G., Arafath S.M.D., Reddy K.S.N., Rao C.T., Reddy L.T., Reddy R.R. Regional trends of aerosol optical depth and their impact on cloud properties over Southern India using MODIS data. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2016;146:38–48. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gopal R.K., Balakrishnaiah G., Arafath S.M., Raja Obul Reddy K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., PavanKumari S., Mallikarjuna Reddy P. Measurements of scattering and absorption properties of surface aerosols at a semi-arid site. Anantapur. Atmos. Res. 2017;183:84–93. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansen A.D.A., Rosen H., Novakov T. The aethalometer an instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles. Sci. Total Environ. 1984;36:191–196. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hess M., Koepke P., Schult I. Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: the software package OPAC. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1998;79:831–844. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hsu N.C., Jeong M.J., Bettenhausen C., Sayer A.M., Hansell R., Seftor C.S., Tsay S.C. Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: the second generation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmosphere. 2013;118(16):9296–9315. [Google Scholar]
  20. Huntzicker J.J., Johnson R.L. Investigation of an ambient interference in the measurement of ozone by ultraviolet absorption photometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1979;13:1414–1416. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hussain N.S., Chakradhar Rao T., Balakrishnaiah G., Rama Gopal K., Raja Obul Reddy K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., Ramakrishna Reddy R. Investigation of black carbon aerosols and their characteristics over tropical urban and semi-arid rural environments in peninsular India. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2018;167:48–57. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ichoku C., Levy R., Kaufman Y.J., Remer L.A., Li R.R., Martins V.J., Holben B.N., Abuhassan N., Slutsker I., Eck T.F., Pietras C. Analysis of the performance characteristics of the five-channel Microtops II Sun photometer for measuring aerosol optical thickness and precipitable water vapor. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002;107 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jain S., Sharma T. Social and travel lockdown impact considering coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on air quality in megacities of India: present benefits, future challenges and way forward. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020:1222–1236. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jenkin M.E., Clemitshaw K.C. Ozone and other secondary photochemical pollutants: chemical processes governing their formation in the planetary boundary layer. Atmos. Environ. 2000;34(16):2499–2527. doi: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00478-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalluri R.O.R., Gugamsetty B., Kotalo R.G., Nagireddy S.K.R., Tandule C.R., Thotli L.R., Ramakrishna R.R., Surendranair S.B. Direct radiative forcing properties of atmospheric aerosols over semi-arid region, Anantapur in India. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;566:1002–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kalluri R.O.R., Balakrishnaiah G., Rama Gopal K., Reddy K.S.N., ChakradharRao T., Lokeswara Reddy T., NazeerHussain S., Reddy V.M., Reddy R.R., Babu S.S. Seasonal variation of near surface black carbon and satellite derived vertical distribution of aerosols over a semi-arid station in India. Atmos. Res. 2017;184:77–87. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalluri R.O.R., Xiaoyu Z., Lei B. Seasonal aerosol variations over a coastal city, Zhoushan, China from CALIPSO observations. Atmos. Res. 2019;218:117–128. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalluri R.O.R., Gugamsetty B., Kotalo R.G., Thotli L.R., Tandule C.R., Bhavyasree A. Long-term (2008–2017) analysis of atmospheric composite aerosol and black carbon radiative forcing over a semi-arid region in southern India: model results and ground measurement. Atmos. Environ. 2020;240:117840. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kanniah D.K., Zaman K.F.A.N., Kaskaoutis G.D., Latif M.T. COVID-19's impact on the atmospheric environment in the Southeast Asia region. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;736(2020):139658. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krotkov N.A., Lamsal L.N., Celarier E.A., Swartz W.H., Marchenko S.V., Bucsela E.J., Chan K.L., Wenig M. The version 3 OMI NO2 standard product. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 2017:1–42. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar R., Narasimhulu K., Balakrishnaiah G., Reddy B.S.K., Gopal K.R., Reddy R.R., Satheesh S.K., Moorthy K.K., Babu S.S. A study on the variations of optical and physical properties of aerosols over a tropical semi-arid station during grassland fire. Atmos. Res. 2010;95:77–87. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lal S., Naja M., Subbaraya B.H. Seasonal variations in surface ozone and its precursors over an urban site in India. Atmos. Environ. 2000;34:2713–2724. [Google Scholar]
  33. Levy R.C., Mattoo S., Munchak L.A., Remer L.A., Sayer A.M., Patadia F., Hsu N.C. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013;6(11):2989–3034. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li C., Kai-Hon Lau A., Mao J., Chu D.A. Retrieval validation, and application of the 1-km aerosol optical depth from MODIS measurements over Hong Kong. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 2005;43(11):2650–2658. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li G., Zavala M., Lei W., Tsimpidi A.P., Karydis V.A., Pandis S.N., Canagaratna M.R., Molina L.T. Simulations of organic aerosol concentrations in Mexico City using the WRF- CHEM model during the MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011;11:3789–3809. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lingaswamy A.P., Arafath S.M., Balakrishnaiah G., Rama Gopal K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., Raja Obul Reddy K., Chakradhar Rao T. Observations of trace gases, photolysis rate coefficients and model simulations over semi-arid region, India. Atmos. Environ. 2017;158:246–258. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu H., Fang C., Miao Y., Ma H., Zhang Q., Zhou Q. Spatio-temporal evolution of population and urbanization in the countries along the Belt and Road 1950–2050. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018;28(7):919–936. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu J., Li S., Wu J., Liu X., Zhang J. Research of influence of sample size on normal information diffusion based on the Monte Carlo method: risk assessment for natural disasters. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018;77(13):480. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lokeswara Reddy T., Balakrishnaiah G., Raja Obul Reddy K., Siva Kumar Reddy N., Chakradhar Rao T., Rama Gopal K., Bhavyasree A. Perturbations of atmospheric surface layer characteristics during the annular solar eclipse on 26 December 2019 over a semi-arid region Anantapur in southern India. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2020;211:105467. [Google Scholar]
  40. Madronich S. The atmosphere and UV-B radiation at ground level. Environ. UV Photobiol. 1993:1–39. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahato S., Pal S., Ghosh K.G. Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India. Sci. Total Environ. 2020:139086. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin R.V., Jacob D.J., Yantosca R.M., Chin M., Ginoux P. Global and regional decreases in tropospheric oxidants from photoche- mical effects of aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. 2003;108(D3):4097. doi: 10.1029/2002JD002622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Meloni D., di Sarra A., De Luisi J.J., Di Iorio T., Fiocco G. Tropospheric aerosols in Mediterranean: III. Measurements and modeling of actinic radiation profiles. J. Geophys. Res. 2003;108:4323. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moorthy K.K., Satheesh S.K. Characteristics of aerosols over a remote island, minicoy in the arabian sea: optical properties and retrieved size distributions. Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 2000;126:81–109. [Google Scholar]
  45. Morys M., Mims F.M., Hagerup S., Anderson S.E., Baker A., Kia J., Walkup T. Design, calibration, and performance of MICROTOPS II handheld ozone monitor and Sun photometer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001;106:14573–14582. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nakada L.Y.K., Urban R.C. COVID-19 pandemic: impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state. Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020:139087. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ramanathan V., Crutzen P.J., Kiehl J.T., Rosenfeld D. Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science. 2001;294:2119–2124. doi: 10.1126/science.1064034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Reddy K.R.O., Balakrishnaiah G., Gopal K., Reddy N.S.K., ChakradharRao T., Lokeswara Reddy T., Hussain N.S., Reddy M.V., Reddy R.R., Boreddy S.K.R., Babu S.S. Long term (2007–2013) observations of columnar aerosol optical properties and retrieved size distributions over Anantapur, India using Multi Wavelength solar Radiometer. Atmos. Environ. 2016;142:238–250. [Google Scholar]
  49. Resmi C.T., Nishanth T., Satheesh Kumar M.K., Manoj M.G., Balachandramohan M., Valsaraj K.T. Air quality improvement during triple-lockdown in the coastal city of Kannur, Kerala to combat Covid-19 transmission. PeerJ. 2020;8 doi: 10.7717/peerj.9642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharma S., Zhang M., Anshika Gao J., Zhang H., Kota S.H. Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;728:138878. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sicard P., De Marco A., Agathokleous E., Feng Z., Xu X., Paoletti E., Calatayud V. Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;735:139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. IPCC . 2013. Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  53. Virkkula A., Makel T., Yli-Tuomi T., Hirsikko A., Koponen I.K., Hämeri K., Hillamo R. A simple procedure for correcting loading effects of aethalometer data. J. Air Waste Manage. 2007;57:1214–1222. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.57.10.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang W., Li Xin, Shao Min, Hu Min, Zeng Limin, Wu Yusheng, Tan Tianyi. The impact of aerosols on photolysis frequencies and ozone production in Beijing during the 4-year period 2012–2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019;19:9413–9429. [Google Scholar]
  55. Weingartner E., Saathoff H., Schnaiter M., Streit N., Bitnar B., Baltensperger U. Absorption of light by soot particles: deter- mination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers. J. Aerosol Sci. 2003;34:1445–1463. [Google Scholar]
  56. Who . World Heal; Organ: 2020. Coronavirus Disease (CoViD-19) Pandemic. [WWW Document] [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu K., Cui K., Young L.H., Wang Y.W., Hsieh Y.K., Wan S., Zhang J. Air quality index, indicatory air pollutants and impact of COVID-19 event on the air quality near Central China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020;20:1204–1221. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao C., Tie X., Lin Y. Reduction of precipitation and increase in aerosols: a positive feedback in Eastern-Central China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006;33:L11814. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao C., Tie X., Brasseur G., Noone K.J., Nakajima T., Zhang Q., Zhang R., Huang M., Duan Y., Li G., Ishizaka Y. Aircraft measurements of cloud droplet spectral dispersion and implications for indirect aerosol radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006;33:L11814. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (24.8KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES