Abstract
MicroRNAs play a vital role in the regulatory mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Current research indicates that microRNA‐423 (miR‐423) is abnormally expressed in various human tumors and participates in multiple signaling pathways of cancer progression. In most studies, miR‐423 was confirmed as oncomiR, while a few contradictory reports considered miR‐423 as an anticancer miRNA. The paradoxical role in cancer may hinder the application of miR‐423 as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Simultaneously, the interaction mechanism between miR‐423 and lncRNA also needs attention. In this review, we have summarized the dual role of aberrant miR‐423 expression and its mechanisms in tumorigenesis, and the therapeutic potential of miR‐423 in human tumors.
Keywords: clinical implications, functional mechanism, MicroRNA‐423, tumorigenesis
Has‐microRNA‐423 (miR‐423) is abnormally expressed in various human tumors and plays a role in cancer progression. Abnormal expression of miR‐423 may have dual effects, and actively exploring its mechanism in tumorigenesis may contribute to the treatment of tumors. Increasing evidence suggests that miR‐423 may serve as a biomarker for early diagnosis and prognostic monitoring of human cancers.

1. BACKGROUND
Human cancer is a major public health concern worldwide. 1 Researchers have accumulated a wealth of knowledge about a complex network of multifunctional regulatory factors that form the basis of cancer progression and the underlying mechanisms, such as sustained proliferation regulation, evading immune surveillance, oncogenes overexpression, inhibition of apoptosis, and the interaction with proteins that play a synergistic effect in carcinogenesis and metastasis. 2 , 3
Dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) in human cancers has been significantly involved in various signaling pathways and the pathogenesis. 4 , 5 , 6 These molecules are a type of small non‐coding RNA, which regulate the expression of certain protein‐coding genes. 7 , 8 MiRNAs function as transcriptional regulators by forming RNA‐induced silencing complexes or as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNA). 9 , 10 That specific regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs may affect tumorigenesis and may be potential targets for gene therapy. 11 MiRNAs usually act post‐transcriptionally by base pairing with the 3'untranslated region of the mRNA to regulate protein synthesis. 12 The binding sites of miRNA targeting mechanism mRNAs are enriched, which endows miRNA itself with strong and specific feedback regulation ability to miRNA targeting activity, that is, the fragment‐specific feedback of miRNA pathway is automatically regulated, complementary with transcription factors to form a mixed feedback loop. 13 Exosomes are membrane‐derived vesicles (30–100 nm) secreted in body fluids, which can selectively transmit miRNA through intercellular communication. exosomal‐derived miRNAs are transferred to receptor cells, and they regulate the expression of target genes, 14 and they also can participate in the development of chemical resistance. 15 There is much evidence that dysregulated expression of various miRNAs in cells can ultimately enhance chemoresistance by affecting cell survival, apoptosis, and autophagy, thereby pushing normal cells toward cancerous cells. 16 In some cases, aberrant expression of miRNAs has been shown to be associated with tumor metastasis. These miRNAs regulate metastasis by regulating the formation of metastatic niches and by regulating their target genes for metabolic reprogramming. 17 As regulators of the human genome, 18 the vast majority of miRNAs are located in cancer‐related genomic regions and participate in tumor progression in the form of tumor suppressor genes or proto‐oncogenes. 19 In addition, some miRNAs have been identified as clinical biomarkers of certain human cancers. 20 , 21 Further elucidation of the associations between miRNAs and carcinogenesis as well as clarification of the underlying mechanisms may contribute to an in‐depth understanding of the mechanisms of cancer development and highlight therapeutic targets for use in the clinic. 22
MicroRNA‐423 (miR‐423) is located at 17q11.2 of chromosome 17 (gene coding ID: 494335). Two mature sequences (namely miR‐423‐3p and miR‐423‐5p) of the miRNA‐423 gene were identified by searching the miRBase sequences. 23 , 24 , 25 Previous studies have confirmed the differential expression of miR‐423 in various human tumors, 26 and also indicated differences in the functional mechanisms in different tumor types. 27 , 28 In this article, we briefly review the latest reports on the functional mechanisms of miR‐423 in tumors and its involvement in signaling pathways. The potential value of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pre‐miR‐423 (rs6505162) as a diagnostic biomarker, and a therapeutic target, are also discussed.
2. THE FUNCTIONAL MECHANISMS OF MiR‐423 IN DIFFERENT CANCERS
MiRNA dysregulation is caused by genetic factors and epigenetic changes. 29 MiRNAs are engaged in fundamental cellular processes that involve evolutionarily conserved cascade reactions. 22 MiR‐423 can function as an suppressor or oncogene gene in cancer via a large number of direct and indirect regulatory target genes (Table 1). Numerous studies have indicated that miR‐423 has different expression patterns and distinct functions in cellular processes such as cell proliferation and cell cycle, cell autophagy and apoptosis, tumor metastasis, and chemoresistance. Therefore, miR‐423 is implicated as a good target for further investigations aimed at designing novel therapeutic strategies to manage tumors.
TABLE 1.
Disease/conditions in which miR‐423 are involved and the possible targets of miR‐423 in human tumors
| Tumors type | miR‐423 form | miR‐423 expression alteration and functional effects | Function or validated targets | Biological functions of | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric cancer (GC) | miR‐423‐5p | Up, carcinogenic | SUFU(−) | Cell proliferation and metastasis(+) | 31 |
| miR‐423‐5p | Up, carcinogenic | TFF1(−) | Cell proliferation and invasion(+) | 34 | |
| miR‐423‐3p | Up, carcinogenic | Bim(−), Beclin‐1(+) and Atg 7(−) | Cell proliferation, migration and invasion(+), autophagy(−) | 52 | |
| miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | β‐catenin Interference(+) | Cell proliferation(−), apoptosis(+), sensitivity to 5‐fluorouracil(+) | 50 | |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) | miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | p21Cip1/Waf1(−) | Cell growth and regulates G1/S transition(+) | 25 |
| miR‐423‐5 | Up, carcinogenic | ATG7(+), pErk‐1/2 and AKT(−) | Cell proliferation(+), autophagy (+), chemoresistance(+) | 44 | |
| miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | BRMS1(−) | Cell invasiveness(+) | 56 | |
| Glioblastomas (GBM) | miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | ING‐4(−), p‐AKT and p‐ERK1/2(+) | Cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, chemoresistance(+) | 37 |
| miR‐423‐3p | Up, carcinogenic | PANX2(−) | Cell proliferation and apoptosis(+) | 46 | |
| miR‐423‐5p | Up, carcinogenic | mitochondrial pathway(+), Bax/Bcl‐2 and cytochrome c(+), Apaf‐1 and caspase‐3(+) | Cell apoptosis(−), cell growth(+),sensitivity to apigenin(+) | 47 | |
| miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | PLCB1(−), p‐ERK(+) | Cell Proliferation and metastasis(−), apoptosis(+) | 48 | |
| Laryngeal carcinoma (LYC) | miR‐423‐3p | Up, carcinogenic | AdipoR2(−) | Cell proliferation, clonogenicity, migration and invasion.(+) | 57 |
| Lung adenocarcinoma (LAD) | miR‐423‐5p | Up, carcinogenic | MTSS1(−) | Colony formation, cell motility, migration and invasion(+) | 60 |
| Lung cancer (LC) | miR‐423‐3p | Up, carcinogenic | TDP‐43 regulates(+) | Cell proliferation, migration and invasion(+) | 58, 59 |
| Colorectal cancer (CRC) | miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | caspases 3, 8 and 9, p53 (+); caspase‐dependent | Cell apoptosis(+), cancer growth(−) | 49 |
| miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | LAMC1(+) | Cell migration and invasion(−), genetic modifier | 62, 63 | |
| miR‐423‐3p | Up, carcinogenic | p21Cip1/Waf1(−) | Cell cycle and cell proliferation(+) | 43 | |
| Breast cancer (BC) | miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | PCNA and mutant p53(+) | Cell proliferation(+) | 36 |
| miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | ZFP36(−), Wnt /β‐catenin(+) | Chemoresistance(+), migration and proliferation(+), apoptosis(−) | 68 | |
| miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | TNIP2(−), NF‐κB signaling pathway(+) | Invasiveness(+) | 64 | |
| Ovarian cancer (OC) | miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | ‐ | Cell proliferation, colony formation and invasion(−) | 38 |
| Endometrial cancer (EC) | miR‐423 | Up, carcinogenic | caspase 3/7 and Bcl‐2(−), PTEN(−) and p‐AKT(+) | Cell proliferation, migration and invasion(+), EMT(+), chemoresistance(+), apoptosis(−) | 45, 55 |
| Prostate cancer (PC) | miR‐423‐5p | Up, carcinogenic | GRIM‐19(−), BCL‐2(+) | Proliferation(+), apoptosis(−) | 35 |
| Osteosarcoma | miR‐423‐5p | Down, anti‐cancer | STMN1(−) | Cell proliferation, colony formation and invasion(+) | 40 |
| Cervical cancer (CC) | miR‐423‐3p | Down, anti‐cancer | Endogenous E6/E7‐regulated(+) | Cell proliferation(+), senescence and apoptosis(−) | 39 |
Abbreviations: (−), suppression and reduction; (+), promotion and activation; AdipoR2, adiponectin receptor 2; Atg7, autophagy‐related gene 7; Bim, Bcl‐2‐interacting mediator; BRMS1, breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1; EMT, epithelial‐mesenchymal transition; FOSL2, FOS like 2, AP‐1 transcription factor subunit; ING‐4, inhibitor of growth 4; LAMC1, laminin γ1; MTSS1, metastasis suppressor 1; p53, tumor protein 53; PANX2, pannexin 2; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; PLCB1, phospholipase C beta 1; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; SUFU, suppressor of fused homolog; TDP‐43, TAR DNA binding protein 43; TFF1, trefoil factor 1.
2.1. Mechanisms of miR‐423 in tumor cell proliferation and the cell cycle
The ability to maintain unrestricted cell proliferation is a hallmark of human tumors. 22 , 30 The uptake of exosomes rich in miR‐423‐5p by cancer cells leads to gastric cancer progression by directly targeting the suppressor of fused protein(SUFU). 31 , 32 Deletion of Trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) protein promotes β‐catenin activation and gastric tumorigenesis, 33 while miR‐423‐5p expression targets negative regulation TFF1 expression and participated in proliferation and metastasis‐related processes of gastric cancer cells. 34 Furthermore, inhibition of miR‐423‐5p expression upregulates gene associated with GRIM‐19 expression and decreases BCL‐2 expression to inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation and promote apoptosis. 35 Pre‐miR‐423‐12C treatment inhibited breast cancer (BC) cell proliferation to a greater extent than pre‐miR‐423‐12A, resulting in the proliferative capacity in the pre‐miR‐423‐12C BC group was worse than that in the pre‐miR‐423‐12A group. 36 Furthermore, the miR‐423 chain promotes BC cell growth by enhancing the expression of mutant p53 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). 36 Overexpression of miR‐423‐5p induces upregulation of p‐ERK1/2 and p‐AKT and enhances glioma cell proliferation, as well as angiogenesis and metastasis by targeting inhibitor of growth 4 (ING‐4). 37 MiR‐423 has also been found to possess a tumor suppressor gene in a few studies, which can inhibit cell proliferation of tumors. Ectopic expression of miR‐423‐5p, as an anticancer miRNA, inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and colony formation. 38 Downregulation of miR‐423‐3p in exosomes secreted by HeLa cervical cancer cells results in E6/E7‐dependent cell proliferation in HPV‐positive cancer cells. 39 MiR‐423‐5p mediated cell colony formation and proliferation in osteosarcoma by inhibiting stathmin1 (STMN1) expression. 40 Thus, miR‐423 is implicated as a therapeutic target to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells and prevent tumor progression (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Schematic view of different roles of miR‐423 in cancer cell proliferation and experiments have confirmed that miR‐423 is involved in the regulation of cellular targets and pathways in tumor cell proliferation and cell cycle. Black font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a carcinogenic miRNA effect in tumors; purple font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA effect in tumors. (Tumor name abbreviation: BC, breast cancer; CC, cervical cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; EC, endometrial cancer; GBM, glioblastoma; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LC, lung cancer; LYC, laryngeal carcinoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; OC, ovarian cancer; PC, prostate cancer; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma.)
The normal cell division process involves a series of highly regulated cell cycle steps. 30 Blockade of this process at certain stages can cause cancer. 22 Bioinformatics analysis has pointed out that miR‐423‐5p mainly acted as oncomiR in tumors and involved in the cancer cell cycle. 41 MiR‐423‐3p can also affect cell cycle progression by regulating ATP/energy metabolism. 42 MiR‐423‐3p promotes the G1 phase to S phase cell cycle transition and inhibits the colorectal cancer cells proliferation by inhibiting p21Cip1/Waf1. 43 MiR‐423‐3p has similar functional effects in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), whereas miR‐423‐5p does not. 25 Interestingly, after miR‐423‐5p was up‐regulated in HCC cells, it was found that the percentage of HCC cells in the S phase showed an increase. 44 The ability of miR‐423 to regulate the cell cycle in tumors remains to be clarified (Figure 1).
2.2. Mechanisms of miR‐423 in apoptosis and autophagy
Inhibition of apoptosis can promote tumor progression. Conversely, apoptosis induction can inhibit tumor progression. 22 A study showed that miR‐423 inhibits cisplatin‐induced apoptosis by modulating the expression levels of caspase 3/7 and Bcl‐2 in endometrial cancer cells. 45 Pannexin 2 (PANX2), which is considered to be a target gene of miR‐423‐3p, is upregulated in glioma cells when miR‐423‐3p is inhibited, leading to a reduction in glioma cell proliferation and the induction of apoptosis. 46 Similarly, miR‐423‐5p targets inhibition of ING‐4 to inhibit apoptosis of glioblastoma cells. 37 Apigenin is a plant‐derived flavonoid that participates in numerous signaling cascades in tumors. 3 When combined with the inhibitory effect of miR‐423‐5p, apigenin‐induced glioma stem cell apoptosis was significantly elevated. 3 , 47 In‐depth studies have shown that miR‐423‐5p enhances the induction of apoptosis by apigenin via the mitochondrial pathway and changes the expression of Bax/Bcl‐2 and cytochrome c/Apaf‐1/caspase‐3. 47 Inhibition of apoptosis by miR‐423 in the above studies promoted tumor progression. On the contrary, miR‐423 can also be used as anti‐cancer miRNA to induce cancer cell apoptosis. For example, MiR‐423‐5p inhibits glioma metastasis by targeting phospholipase C beta 1 (PLCB1) via the ERK‐dependent pathway, and also promotes apoptosis in glioma cells. 48 Increased miR‐423‐5p expression induces the expression of caspase 3, 8, 9, and p53 in colon cancer cells, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting cell apoptosis. 49 Similarly, Knockdown expression of β‐catenin can downregulate miR‐423‐5p expression, thereby promoting gastric cancer apoptosis. 50 Thus, these reports provide evidence that miR‐423 influences the process of apoptosis in tumor cells (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.

Schematic view of different cancer roles of miR‐423 in cell apoptosis and autophagy, and experimentally confirmed cellular targets and pathways of miR‐423 in the cell apoptosis and autophagy. Black font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a carcinogenic miRNA effect in tumors; purple font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA effect in tumors. (Tumor name abbreviation: BC, breast cancer; CC, cervical cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; GBM, glioblastoma; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LAD, lung adenocarcinoma; PC, prostate cancer.)
Interventions to both stimulate and inhibit autophagy have been proposed as cancer therapies. 51 So far, there have been few reports on miR‐423 and autophagy in cancer. Treatment of liver cancer cells with sorafenib showed that miR‐423‐5p is a promoter of autophagy in HCC cells. 44 MiR‐423‐3p activates carcinogenesis of gastric cancer cells and affects Beclin‐1‐dependent autophagy by downregulating Bim and Atg 7 expression. 52 It can be speculated that more than one autophagy pathway is influenced by miR‐423 in different tumors and therefore, further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of miR‐423 and cell autophagy in specific tumors (Figure 2).
2.3. MiR‐423 and metastasis
MiR‐423 is a common marker of transcarcinal metastasis in metastatic samples. 53 Epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) facilitates the smooth colonization of cancer cells in other target organs. 54 Overexpression of miR‐423 in endometrial cancer cells alters EMT and modulates the expression levels of PTEN and p‐AKT, ultimately promoting the metastasis of endometrial cancer cells. 45 , 55 MiRNA‐423‐5p participates in gastric cancer (GC) cell invasion by downregulating TFF1 expression. 34 Similarly, the miR‐423‐3p‐Bim axis promotes GC cell metastasis. 52 MiR‐423 also significantly inhibited BRMS1 protein expression and exacerbated the aggressiveness of HCC. 56 In laryngeal cancer, miR‐423‐3p has been confirmed to affect tumor cell metastasis by regulating AdipoR2. 57 Furthermore, TAR DNA binding protein (TDP‐43) promotes lung cancer cell metastasis by upregulating the expression of oncogenic miR‐423‐3p. 58 , 59 In addition to these functions, miR‐423‐5p also significantly promotes colony formation, cell migration, invasion and distant brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma by inhibiting metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1) expression, 60 Similarly, high miR‐423‐3p expression is also associated with an increased risk of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma. 61 In addition, overexpression of miR‐423‐5p downregulates ING‐4 expression in glioma tissues to enhance angiogenesis and promote glioma cell invasion. 37 With this just the opposite is, MiR‐423 can also act as a tumor suppressor in colon cancer.The up‐regulated MiR‐423‐5p can specifically bind and downregulate the expression of LAMC1, thereby inhibiting the migration of colorectal cancer cells. 62 , 63 For another example, miR‐423‐5p overexpression inhibits osteosarcoma cell metastasis by inhibiting STMN1 expression. 40 Similarly, miR‐423‐5p directly targets PLCB1 expression in glioma to inhibit tumor cell metastasis. 48 The latest research shows that abnormally high expression of miR‐423 enhances the aggressiveness of breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, the up‐regulation of miR‐423 targets the inhibition of TNIP2 expression resulting in the activation of the NF‐κB signaling pathway and the increased expression of snails and twists. 64 Thus, it is clear that abnormal expression of miR‐423 can affect cancer cell metastasis of human tumors, miR‐423 may be a promising prognostic and therapeutic marker for patients with metastatic cancer. (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3.

Schematic view of different cancer roles of miR‐423 in cancer metastasis (including EMT, migration and invasion) and experimentally confirmed cellular targets and pathways of miR‐423. Black font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a carcinogenic miRNA effect in tumors; purple font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA effect in tumors. (Tumor name abbreviation: BC, breast cancer; CC, cervical cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; EC, endometrial cancer; GBM, glioblastoma; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LC, lung cancer; LYC, laryngeal carcinoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; OC, ovarian cancer; PC, prostate cancer; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma.)
2.4. MiR‐423 and chemotherapy response
Resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs impairs the ability to cure cancer patients after relapse. 22 In malignant tumors, Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway can regulate certain miRNAs to participate in malignant tumor progression. 50 , 65 Decreasing β‐catenin expression downregulates miR‐423‐5p expression and reduces the resistance of gastric cancer cells to 5‐fluorouracil. 50 miR‐423‐5p may act as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer, and upregulating its expression can increase the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5‐fluorouracil. Whole blood samples stored at room temperature for 24 hours had no significant effect on the concentration of miR‐423‐5p, indicating that serum miR‐423‐5p can be used as a biomarker for therapeutic response. 66 In sorafenib‐treated HCC, the upregulated levels of secreted miR‐423‐5p correlated positively with the sorafenib response. 44 Concurrently, miR‐423‐5p transfected HCC cells can promote the regulation of autophagy. 44 Ectopic miR‐423‐5p highly expression in gliomas is a potential tumor promoter, targets ING‐4 expression, enhances the formation of glioblastoma neurospheres and confers resistance to temozolomide in glioma cells. 37 , 67 Furthermore, knockdown miR‐423‐5p increases the sensitivity to apigenin‐induced apoptosis in glioma stem cells, 47 the combination of apigenin and miR‐423‐5p knockdown has an additive effect of promoting apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation. 47 MiR‐423 high expression induces the sensitivity of endometrial cancer cells to cisplatin by causing loss of PTEN and activation of AKT. Therefore, miR‐423 is implicated as a predictive biomarker of cisplatin chemotherapy response in endometrial cancer. 45 MiR‐423 has been proved to be an oncogene that promotes the malignant breast cancer (BC) cells proliferation and migration, can inhibit the expression of ZFP36 in BC cells, and activate Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway, ultimately affecting the chemoresistance and apoptosis rate of BC cells. 68 Similarly, the abnormal exosomal miR‐423‐5p expression affects the therapeutic effect of cisplatin in triple negative BC. 69 Meanwhile, circulating miR‐423‐5p may also serve as a potential biomarker for chemotherapy‐related cardiac dysfunction in BC patients. 70 There are few reports on the relationship between miR‐423 and chemotherapy response in tumors. Thus, the association of miR‐423 with chemotherapy resistance in other tumors remains to be clarified (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4.

Schematic view of different cancer roles of miR‐423 in chemotherapy response and experimentally confirmed cellular targets and pathways of miR‐423 in chemotherapy response. Black font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a carcinogenic miRNA effect in tumors; purple font indicates that miR‐423 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA effect in tumors. (Tumor name abbreviation: EC, endometrial cancer; GBM, glioblastoma; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.)
3. THE REGULATORY MECHANISM OF MiR‐423 AND LNCRNA IN HUMAN TUMOR
Long noncoding RNA (lncRNAs) is a new regulator of genomic stability and human diseases. 71 lncRNAs plays an essential role in maintaining embryonic stem cells pluripotency, coordinating the regulation of immune cell activation and heterochromatin formation. 72 Many factors have been found to affect the expression and secondary structure of lncRNAs. 73 The different processing and localization of lncRNA are the factors that lead to the rapid evolution of lncRNA's functions, which contribute to the nonconservative functions of stem cells. 74 Unstable transcripts associated with lncRNAs and promoters or enhancers are preferentially localized to chromatin, some of which regulate chromatin structure, transcription, and RNA processing. 75 The data show that lncRNA potency can be closely related to lncRNA abundance. In the lncRNA targeted domain, Polycomb responsive complexes are recruited to CpG island through lncRNA independent mechanism, and then interact with lncRNA and its related proteins through three‐dimensional space to make Polycomb responsive complexes diffuse and nucleate in lncRNA targeted domain. 76 Many lncRNAs related to various types of cancer have been identified by genome‐wide association studies of tumor samples. LncRNA expression mutations can promote tumor occurrence and metastasis. 77 LncRNA also participates in the metabolic remodeling of tumor cells and promotes the rapid proliferation of cancer cells. 72 Numerous studies have shown that lncRNAs can bind to miRNA sites as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), thereby regulating and affecting the expression of downstream target genes. These lncRNAs can play an important regulatory role in tumor pathogenesis through the lncRNA‐microRNA‐mRNA related ceRNA network. 78
The regulatory role between miR‐423 and LncRNA in tumors is mainly the ceRNAs mechanism, and we also give a brief overview of the related research progress (Table 2). In some studies, low expression of lncRNA in cancer tissues has been found to act as a tumor suppressor gene and inhibit tumor progression. LncRNA MT1JP inhibits the malignant phenotype of non‐small cell lung cancer by regulating the miRNA‐423‐3p/Bim signaling axis. 79 The lncRNA FENDRR inhibits miR‐423‐5p and upregulates GADD45B to reduce proliferation and tumorigenicity and promote apoptosis of hepatoma cells, thereby preventing Treg‐mediated immune escape of liver cancer. 80 LncRNA LINC00968 inhibits miR‐423‐5p expression in a concentration‐dependent manner and mediates upregulation of prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1) expression to inhibit breast cancer progression, such as cell proliferation, migration, and tube‐forming ability as well as tumor growth. 81 miR‐423 is highly expressed in the above studies and plays a role of carcinogenic (Figure 5).
TABLE 2.
Summary of studies on regulatory mechanisms between miR‐423 and lncRNA in human tumors
| Tissue or cell type | LncRNA name (ceRNA yes or no) | LncRNA alteration and functional effects | LncRNA biological functions | MiR‐423 form and signal axis | miR‐423 functional effects and expression alteration | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | MT1JP (ceRNA) | Up, anti‐cancer | Cell proliferation(−), cell migration and invasion(−), cell apoptosis(+) | miRNA‐423‐3p/Bim | Carcinogenic, down | 79 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) | FENDRR (ceRNA) | Down, anti‐cancer | Cell proliferation and tumorigenicity(−), apoptosis(+), Treg‐Mediated Immune Escape(−) | miR‐423‐5p/GADD45B | Carcinogenic, up | 80 |
| Breast cancer (BC) | LINC00968 (ceRNA) | Down, anti‐cancer | Cell proliferation, migration and tube formation abilities, tumor growth(−) | miR‐423‐5p/PROX1 | Carcinogenic, up | 81 |
| Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) | CASC9 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell proliferation, migration and invasion(+) | miR‐423‐5p/SOX12 | Anti‐cancer, down | 82 |
| Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) | LOXL1‐AS1 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell proliferation(+), cell migration and invasion(+), cell apoptosis(−) | miR‐423‐5p/MYBL2 | Anti‐cancer, down | 83 |
| Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) | NR2F1‐AS1 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell proliferation(+), cell migration and invasion(+) | miR‐423‐5p/SOX12 | Anti‐cancer, down | 84 |
| Ovarian cancer (OC) | LINC00319 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell proliferation(+), cell migration and invasion(+) | miR‐423‐5p/NACC1 pathway | Anti‐cancer, down | 85 |
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) | AFAP1‐AS1 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell migration and invasion(+) | miR‐423‐5p, FOSL2/Rho/Rac signaling | Anti‐cancer, down | 86 |
| Gastric cancer (GC) | LINC01606 (ceRNA) | Up, carcinogenic | Cell migration and invasion(+) | miR‐423‐5p, Wnt3a/Wnt/β‐catenin signaling | Anti‐cancer, down | 87 |
| Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) | LINC01426 | Up, carcinogenic | Cell proliferation and migration(+) | IGF2BP1/CTBP1/HDAC2/miR‐423‐5p/FOXM1 axis | Anti‐cancer, down | 88 |
Abbreviations: (−), suppression and reduction; (+), promotion and activation; Bim, BCL2‐like 11; FOSL2, FOS like 2, AP‐1 transcription factor subunit; FOXM1, forkhead box M1; GADD45B, growth arrest and DNA damage inducible beta; IGF2BP1, insulin‐like growth factor 2 mRNA‐binding protein 1; MYBL2, myb proto‐oncogene like 2; NACC1, nucleus accumbens associated 1; PLCB1: phospholipase C beta 1; PROX1, prospero homeobox 1; SOX12, SRY (sex determining region Y)‐box 12; Wnt3a, Wnt family member 3A.
FIGURE 5.

Regulatory mechanism of miR‐423 and LncRNA in human tumor. The regulatory roles of miR‐423 and LncRNAs in tumors are mainly ceRNAs mechanism, which participate in cancer cell proliferation and growth, migration and invasion, apoptosis, immune escape and chemotherapeutic resistance by regulating multiple targets. Orange font indicates that lncRNA plays an Anti‐cancer lncRNA effect in tumors and that miR‐423 acts as an oncogenic miRNA; purple font indicates that lncRNA acts as a carcinogenic lncRNA effect in tumors and that miR‐423 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA. (Tumor name abbreviation: BC, breast cancer; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LC, lung cancer; LUAD, Lung adenocarcinoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; NSCLC, Non‐small cell lung cancer; OC, ovarian cancer; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TSCC, Tongue squamous cell carcinoma.)
With this just the opposite is, LncRNAs interacting with miR‐423 are highly expressed in most tumor tissues and can promote tumor progression. LncRNA CASC9 is upregulated in tongue squamous cell carcinoma tissues and cells, suggesting that patients have poor prognosis and can influence the malignant process of tongue squamous cell carcinoma by regulating the miR‐423‐5p/SOX12 axis. 82 The positive feedback loop of lncRNA LOXL1 antisense RNA 1(LOXL1‐AS1)/miR‐423‐5p/MYBL2 in lung adenocarcinoma is carcinogenic, and The high expression of LOXL1‐AS1 competitively inhibits miR‐423‐5p expression and targets MYBL2 to promote proliferation and migration, and inhibit apoptosis of lung adenocarcinoma cell. 83 The highly expressed lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 regulates miR‐423‐5p/SRY‐box 12 axis to promote papillary thyroid carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion. 84 Upregulation of LINC00319 has carcinogenic effects and enhances the expression of nucleus accumbens associated 1 (NACC1) by inhibiting miR‐423‐5p, which then promotes ovarian cancer cells metastasis and proliferation. 85 The lncRNA AFAP1‐AS1 competitively inhibits miR‐423‐5p expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to regulate the Rho/Rac pathway, thereby mediating the expression of FOSL2 and ultimately, promoting the distant metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. 86 The high expression of LINC01606 in gastric cancer (GC) liberates miR‐423‐5p bound to Wnt3a through a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanism, thereby upregulating Wnt3a expression and inhibiting the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway to promote gastric cancer cell metastasis. 87 LINC01426 is upregulated in the renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell line, promoting the proliferation and migration of rccRCC cells. 88 Mechanistically, LINC01426 upregulates FOXM1 expression by inhibiting miR‐423‐5p, while LINC01426 can recruit IGF2BP1 to increase CTBP1 expression. CTBP1 and HDAC2 can also inhibit miR‐423‐5p expression, while downregulated miR‐423‐5p can Targeted upregulation of FOXM1 expression to promote the progress of ccRCC. 88 In the above studies, it was found that the expression of miR‐423 was often inhibited and played an anti‐tumor role (Figure 5).
In summary, compared with miR‐423‐3p, the functions and molecular mechanisms of miR‐423‐5p in human tumors have been more extensively investigated and may be more important, although this speculation remains to be confirmed in studies. MiR‐423 interacts with other biomolecules and participates in the tumor progression. Thus, miR‐423 is implicated as a biological target for tumor therapy.
4. PROGRESS IN SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM (SNP) RESEARCH ON MiR‐423 (rs6505162)
Due to the inherent cancer‐specific heterogeneity, SNPs play a crucial role in the development of human tumors. 89 , 90 A meta‐analysis of miR‐423 polymorphisms and cancer prognosis suggests that rs6505162 is a prognostic marker of all common human cancers. 91 According to another meta‐analysis, rs6505162 may participate in the prevention of cancers such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer, but does not reduce the risk of breast cancer, esophageal cancer and gastric cancer. 92 These polymorphisms have the potential to lead to metabolic abnormalities and changes in cancer susceptibility (Table 3). The rs6505162 C>A polymorphism, mapping to chromosome 17 at 17q11.2, is situated in the pre‐miRNA region of miR‐423. 27 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 The pre‐miR‐423 SNP can prevent endogenous processing of two mature forms of miRNA (miR‐423‐5p and miR‐423‐3p). 36 It is widely believed that miRNA‐SNPs exert biological functions through two main mechanisms: (a) by changing the specific sequence of the miRNA core region and altering the binding affinity between the miRNA and the mRNA; and (b) by affecting the mature modification process of miRNA and altering its expression. 22
TABLE 3.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in premiR‐423 in various tumors
| Cancer type | Year | Country | Sample size | Potential significance and sensitivity/specificity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) | 2013 | South Africa | 368 cases and 583 controls | In Blacks, under dominant, additive and recessive models with odds ratios (ORs) 1.353, 1.404, and 2.858, respectively. (OR(GE) = 7.855, P(GE) = 9.17*10(−10) in the Black group). | 107 |
| 2017 | Iran | 200cases and 300 controls | Codominant (AA vs. CC, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.32 [0.15–0.69], p‐value: 0.0076); recessive (AA vs. CC+CA, OR [95% CI]: 0.35 [0.16–0.73], p‐value: 0.0027); log‐additive models (OR [95% CI]: 0.69 [0.52–0.91], p‐value: 0.0084). | 109 | |
| Esophageal cancer (EC) | 2008 | USA | 346 Case and 346 Control | Per‐allele OR of 0.64 [95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.80; p < 0.0001]. | 106 |
| Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) | 2013 | China | 629 cases and 686 controls | AA vs. CC/CA: adjusted OR = 4.94, 95% CI = 1.42–17.21, p = 0.012. | 108 |
| 2019 | Mixed | 22 studies from 13 articles | No significant associations between the rs6505162 and the susceptibility of ESCC in any genetic model. | 110 | |
| Breast cancer (BC) | 2012 | Australia | 179 cases and 174 controls | The CC genotype reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27–0.92, p = 0.03). | 100 |
| 2018 | United Kingdom | European 97, Asian 90, African 90. | 57% Europeans associated with AC genotype, while approx. 60% Asians display mostly associated with CC genotype, and approx. 60% Africans mainly associated with AA genotype. | 114 | |
| 2015 | China. | 5 matched cell lines, 114 cases and 114 controls | 2/5 Breast cancer cell lines and 8.77% (10/114) tumors undergo somatic mutations of the rs6505162 SNP. | 36 | |
| 2016 | Chile | 440 cases and 807 controls | rs6505162:C>A (OR = 1.7 [95% CI 1.0–2.0] p = 0.05). | 99 | |
| 2014 | China | 7170 case and 8783 controls | rs6505162 no significant association with the risk of breast cancer in any genetic model. | 116 | |
| 2015 | South Korea | 136 cases and 224 controls | miR‐423C>A polymorphism is associated with increased risk of POI. | 115 | |
| Lung cancer (LC) | 2016 | China | 575 case and 608 controls | rs2910164 G allele was associated with lower risk of lung cancer (OR: 0.80), compared with CC genotype (adjusted OR: 0.77) and CA/AA genotype decreased risk (adjusted OR: 0.54). The allele model with OR of 0.75. | 102 |
| 2015 | China | 258 cases and 310 controls | The interaction between rs6505162 gene and environment was not statistically significant. | 111 | |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) | 2014 | China | 984 case and 991 controls | rs6505162 had no effect on the risk of HCC. | 119 |
| Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) | 2013 | Aachen | 674 AGC patients | rs6505162 had no effect on the risk of AGC. | 121 |
| Wilms tumor (WT) | 2018 | China | 145 cases and 531 controls. | Susceptibility to WT (CA vs. CC: adjusted OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.42–0.99, p = 0.047). Compared with CC genotype, CA/AA genotypes decreased risk of WT (adjusted OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.14–0.63, p = 0.002) and clinical stage I+II WT (adjusted OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.20–0.85, p = 0.017). | 28 |
| Colorectal cancer (CRC) | 2018 | China | 117 case and 84 controls | Compared with CC homozygote, the AC heterozygote but not AA homozygote decreased risk of CRC (OR = 0.421, 95% CI = 0.230–0.772, p = 0.005 for AC heterozygote; and OR = 0.937, 95% CI = 0.157–5.614, p = 0.944 for AA homozygote, respectively), the combination of AC and AA genotype decreased risk of CRC (OR = 0.450, 95% CI = 0.250–0.812, p = 0 .008). | 118 |
| 2012 | China | 496 eligible CRC patients | Compared with the homozygous wild‐type genotype, the variant‐containing genotypes of SNP associated with both the OS (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.34–3.34, p = 0.001) and the RFS (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.08–2.36, p = 0.019). | 117 | |
| Multiple cancer (meta‐analysis) | 2017 | Mixed | 8582 cases and 10 291 controls | AA genotype decreased cancer risk under the recessive model (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.98, p = 0.020). Subgroup analyses decrease in risk of lung cancer (dominant model: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60–0.89, p = 0.002; recessive model: OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.95, p = 0.031). | 104 |
| 2018 | Mixed | 10 500 cases and 13 781 controls | rs6505162 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in heterozygous codominant (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79–0.97, p = 0.009, AC vs. CC), dominanat (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77–0.95, p = 0.005, AC+AA vs. CC), and allele (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82–0.96, p = 0.003, A vs. C) genetic models. | 92 |
Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; POI, primary ovarianinsufficiency; RFS, recurrence‐free survival.
Growing evidence supports the association between rs6505162 and the cancer risk of several cancers, as well as the susceptibility of individuals to cancer, although the results are contradictory. 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 Pre‐miR‐423 SNP has been reported to affect mature miR‐423 expression in cell lines derived from endometrial carcinoma 105 and breast cancer 36 tissues, and plays an oncogenic role in tumorigenesis. 36 The rs6505162 SNP has been reported to affect the risk of esophageal cancer. 106 Many reports have also linked rs6505162 to environmental exposure to cancer. A recent study conducted in South Africa indicated that rs6505162 is associated with environmental exposure to smoke and can increase the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 107 In addition to environmental factors, genetic factors (such as rs6505162) are also play carcinogenic roles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 108 , 109 Nevertheless, a recent study demonstrated that there is no correlation between any genetic model of miR‐423 (including rs6505162) and susceptibility to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 110 Similarly, there is no biological association between rs6505162 and passive smoking exposure in Chinese women with lung cancer. 111 The rs6505162 SNP is associated with genetic susceptibility to lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma, 102 The rs6505162 SNP also has implications for the prognosis of patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer. 112 Two recent meta‐analyses, indicated that rs6505162 significantly decreased the risk of lung cancer, suggesting that this miR‐423 polymorphism is an effective protective factor against lung cancer. 104 , 113 Analysis using association methods revealed that the CC genotype of rs6505162 reduced the risk of breast cancer development. 100 There are ethnic differences in susceptibility to breast cancer. An in silico analysis showed that the AC genotype is mainly associated with Europeans (57%), while Africans and Asians were mainly AA (about 60%) and CC (about 60%), respectively. 114 The rs6505162 SNP was found to affect the risk of familial breast cancer in a study conducted in South America. 99 Rah et al reported that breast cancer‐related microRNA polymorphisms, including rs6505162, are connected with increased primary ovarian insufficiency risk via interactions with miR‐423 A variants. 115 Interestingly, a case‐control study (7170 breast cancer and 8783 controls) showed no correlation between the various genetic models of miR‐423 and the risk of breast cancer. 116 Dozens of colorectal cancer susceptibility bases have been identified by genome‐wide association analysis (GWAS), and rs6505162 has been shown to affect the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients following chemotherapy. 63 , 117 Similarly, rs6505162 has been identified as a biomarker of colorectal cancer metastasis. 118 Another study indicated that rs6505162 has a negative impact on susceptibility to Wilms tumor, especially in Chinese children. 28 However, no significant associations were found in some cancers, such as bladder cancer, 103 HCC, 119 and gastric cancer/advanced gastric cancer. 120 , 121 The miR‐423 rs6505162 polymorphism is considered to be a tumor‐related susceptibility gene. Functional characterization of the rs6505162 polymorphism as potentially harmful risk alleles helps clarify its function in complex diseases.
5. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MiR‐423 IN CANCER
MiRNA plays an irreplaceable regulatory role in the occurrence and development of tumors. 122 Specific serum miRNA expression profiles can be used for early diagnosis of cancer as well as monitoring treatment efficacy. 123 High miR‐423 expression in glioma patients may indicate advanced grade and poor prognosis. 46 , 67 The combination of miR‐423‐5p with other miRNA biomarkers (miR‐150‐5p and miR‐222‐3p) can be used to monitor the malignant progression of oral leukoplakia. 124 , 125 Overexpression of miR‐423‐5p has been implicated as a biomarker or therapeutic target of brain metastasis in lung cancer. 60 The combination of miR‐423‐3p and the three other miRNAs (miR‐148b, miR‐221 and miR‐23b) has proved to be a novel and non‐invasive marker for lung cancer detection, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.885. 126 Therefore, miR‐423 is expected to become a therapeutic target and prognostic marker for lung cancer. 58 MiR‐423 plays a similar prognostic role in HCC patients. When miR‐423 was used in combination with three other miRNAs (miR‐10a, miR‐375, and miR‐122), the AUC for the diagnosis of HCC was 0.995. 127 The combination of miR‐423‐3p with miR‐151‐5p and miR‐152‐3p is also a clinically effective marker for cervical cancer patients. 128 In patients with stage I–II colorectal cancer, serum miR‐423‐5p levels were significantly upregulated compared with the levels in healthy controls, whereas in stage III–IV patients, there was no significant increase in serum miR‐423‐5p levels. 129 Therefore, plasma levels of miR‐423‐5p can be used as a biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer. 49 , 130 MiR‐423‐5p also has a similar function and clinical prognostic value in ovarian cancer. 38 The miRNAs in different ethnic breast cancers, as well as specific genetic variations in miRNA genes, may influence the risk of breast cancer. 114 It has been reported that 70.1% of hereditary breast cancers can be distinguished from non‐hereditary breast cancer on the basis of miR‐423‐3p expression. 131 Identification of the 7‐miRNA group (including miR‐423‐5p) has improved the accuracy of diagnosing bladder cancer with an AUC of 0.923, of which urinary miRNAs may have important clinical value in the prediction of recurrence in bladder cancer. 132 MiR‐423‐3p can be used in combination with four other miRNAs (miR‐1, miR‐20a, miR‐27a, and miR‐34) to diagnose gastric cancer, with the AUC reaching 0.879, which is significantly higher than that of CA19‐9 (0.600) and CEA (0.503). 133 Similarly, serum exosome‐derived miR‐423 may also be a new target for gastric cancer‐specific therapeutic interventions. 31 , 34 , 52 In summary, clinical studies of miR‐423 in human cancer are still in the preliminary stages, and further large‐scale evidence‐based medical research is needed to confirm the clinical importance of miR‐423.
6. CONCLUSION
In this review, we have introduced published literature on the dysregulation of miR‐423 in malignancies and the molecular mechanism of miR‐423 mediated carcinogenesis. Expression of miR‐423 has been confirmed to be abnormal in various human cancers and has been revealed as a critical factor involved in tumorigenesis. Although clinical applications of miR‐423 in cancer are yet to be established, accumulating evidence supports the use of miR‐423 as a biomarker in the early diagnosis and prognosis of human cancers in addition to monitoring treatment efficacy.
COMPETITIVE INTERESTS
The authors claim that they have no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the Graduate School of Fujian Medical University for its learning platform and strong support. The authors also thank the help of the research department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University.
First author: RuiSheng Ke
Funding information
This work was supported by the Fujian Natural Science Foundation (Youth Innovation) Project (No. 2020J05299) and Xiamen Medical and Health Guiding Project Fund Project (No. 3502Z20209011) for RuiSheng Ke, The Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (no. 2019Y0068) for LiZhi Lv , Startup Fund for scientific research of Fujian Medical University for RuiSheng Ke (no.2017XQ2048) and Major Medical Research Fund Project of the Logistics Department of the People's Liberation Army for Yi Jiang (no. 14ZX22 and 2014CXTD05).
Contributor Information
RuiSheng Ke, Email: ringsonke@163.com.
Yi Jiang, Email: jiangyi8183@163.com.
REFERENCES
- 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646‐674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ozbey U, Attar R, Romero MA, et al. Apigenin as an effective anticancer natural product: spotlight on TRAIL, WNT/beta‐catenin, JAK‐STAT pathways, and microRNAs. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(2):1060‐1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(11):857‐866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Iorio MV, Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation. Cancer J. 2012;18(3):215‐222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ke RS, Zhang K, Lv LZ, et al. Prognostic value and oncogene function of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 overexpression in HBV‐related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;129:140‐151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281‐297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Younger ST, Corey DR. Transcriptional gene silencing in mammalian cells by miRNA mimics that target gene promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(13):5682‐5691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215‐233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post‐transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(2):102‐114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gomarasca M, Maroni P, Banfi G, Lombardi G. microRNAs in the antitumor immune response and in bone metastasis of breast cancer: from biological mechanisms to therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, Filipowicz W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:351‐379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang D, Wang T, Gill A, et al. Uncovering the cellular capacity for intensive and specific feedback self‐control of the argonautes and MicroRNA targeting activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(9):4681‐4697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bandopadhyay M, Bharadwaj M. Exosomal miRNAs in hepatitis B virus related liver disease: a new hope for biomarker. Gut Pathog. 2020;12:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Alharbi M, Sharma S, Guanzon D, et al. miRNA signature in small extracellular vesicles and their association with platinum resistance and Cancer recurrence in ovarian cancer. Nanomedicine. 2020;28:102207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jamali Z, Taheri‐Anganeh M, Shabaninejad Z, et al. Autophagy regulation by microRNAs: novel insights into osteosarcoma therapy. IUBMB Life. 2020;72(7):1306‐1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kanchan RK, Siddiqui JA, Mahapatra S, Batra SK, Nasser MW. microRNAs orchestrate pathophysiology of breast cancer brain metastasis: advances in therapy. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Esquela‐Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs ‐ microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(4):259‐269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(6):389‐402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Melo SA, Esteller M. Dysregulation of microRNAs in cancer: playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(13):2087‐2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Inui M, Martello G, Piccolo S. MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(4):252‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhi Y, Zhou H, Mubalake A, et al. Regulation and functions of MicroRNA‐149 in human cancers. Cell Prolif. 2018;51(5):e12465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kasashima K, Nakamura Y, Kozu T. Altered expression profiles of microRNAs during TPA‐induced differentiation of HL‐60 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2004;322(2):403‐410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Landgraf P, Rusu M, Sheridan R, et al. A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell. 2007;129(7):1401‐1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lin J, Huang S, Wu S, et al. MicroRNA‐423 promotes cell growth and regulates G(1)/S transition by targeting p21Cip1/Waf1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(11):1641‐1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Afanasyeva EA, Hotz‐Wagenblatt A, Glatting KH, Westermann F. New miRNAs cloned from neuroblastoma. BMC Genom. 2008;9:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Farazi TA, Horlings HM, ten Hoeve JJ, et al. MicroRNA sequence and expression analysis in breast tumors by deep sequencing. Cancer Res. 2011;71(13):4443‐4453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fu W, Li L, Xiong SW, et al. miR‐423 rs6505162 C>A polymorphism contributes to decreased Wilms tumor risk. J Cancer. 2018;9(14):2460‐2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang L, Huang J, Yang N, et al. microRNAs exhibit high frequency genomic alterations in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(24):9136‐9141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ingham M, Schwartz GK. Cell‐cycle therapeutics come of age. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(25):2949‐2959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yang H, Fu H, Wang BO, et al. Exosomal miR‐423‐5p targets SUFU to promote cancer growth and metastasis and serves as a novel marker for gastric cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2018;57(9):1223‐1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ge J, Zhu J, Xia BO, et al. miR‐423‐5p inhibits myoblast proliferation and differentiation by targeting Sufu. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(9):7610‐7620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Soutto M, Peng D, Katsha A, et al. Activation of beta‐catenin signalling by TFF1 loss promotes cell proliferation and gastric tumorigenesis. Gut. 2015;64(7):1028‐1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Liu J, Wang XU, Yang X, et al. miRNA423‐5p regulates cell proliferation and invasion by targeting trefoil factor 1 in gastric cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2014;347(1):98‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lin H, Lin T, Lin J, et al. Inhibition of miR‐423‐5p suppressed prostate cancer through targeting GRIM‐19. Gene. 2019;688:93‐97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhao H, Gao A, Zhang Z, et al. Genetic analysis and preliminary function study of miR‐423 in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(6):4763‐4771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Li S, Zeng A, Hu Q, Yan W, Liu Y, You Y. miR‐423‐5p contributes to a malignant phenotype and temozolomide chemoresistance in glioblastomas. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(1):55‐65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tang X, Zeng X, Huang YU, et al. miR‐423‐5p serves as a diagnostic indicator and inhibits the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(6):4723‐4730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Honegger A, Schilling D, Bastian S, et al. Dependence of intracellular and exosomal microRNAs on viral E6/E7 oncogene expression in HPV‐positive tumor cells. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(3):e1004712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang X, Peng L, Gong X, Zhang X, Sun R, Du J. miR‐423‐5p inhibits osteosarcoma proliferation and invasion through directly targeting STMN1. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50(6):2249‐2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Xie S, Batnasan E, Zhang Q, Li Y. MicroRNA expression is altered in granulosa cells of ovarian hyperresponders. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(8):1001‐1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Siengdee P, Trakooljul N, Murani E, Schwerin M, Wimmers K, Ponsuksili S. MicroRNAs regulate cellular ATP levels by targeting mitochondrial energy metabolism genes during C2C12 myoblast differentiation. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li HT, Zhang H, Chen Y, Liu XF, Qian J. MiR‐423‐3p enhances cell growth through inhibition of p21Cip1/Waf1 in colorectal cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(3):1044‐1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Stiuso P, Potenza N, Lombardi A, et al. MicroRNA‐423‐5p promotes autophagy in cancer cells and is increased in serum from hepatocarcinoma patients treated with sorafenib. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015;4:e233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Li J, Sun H, Liu T, Kong J. MicroRNA‐423 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion and induces chemoresistance of endometrial cancer cells. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(5):4213‐4224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Xu J, He J, Huang H, Peng R, Xi J. MicroRNA‐423‐3p promotes glioma growth by targeting PANX2. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(1):179‐188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 47. Wan Y, Fei X, Wang Z, et al. miR‐423‐5p knockdown enhances the sensitivity of glioma stem cells to apigenin through the mitochondrial pathway. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(4):1010428317695526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zhao P, Sun S, Zhai Y, Tian Q, Zhou T, Li J. miR‐423‐5p inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of glioblastoma cells by targeting phospholipase C beta 1. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12(8):2941‐2950. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Jia W, Yu T, An Q, Cao X, Pan H. MicroRNA‐423‐5p inhibits colon cancer growth by promoting caspase‐dependent apoptosis. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):1225‐1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Dong L, Deng J, Sun ZM, et al. Interference with the beta‐catenin gene in gastric cancer induces changes to the miRNA expression profile. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(9):6973‐6983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(9):528‐542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kong P, Zhu X, Geng Q, et al. The microRNA‐423‐3p‐Bim axis promotes cancer progression and activates oncogenic autophagy in gastric cancer. Mol Ther. 2017;25(4):1027‐1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lee SC, Quinn A, Nguyen T, Venkatesh S, Quinn TP. A cross‐cancer metastasis signature in the microRNA‐mRNA axis of paired tissue samples. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(6):5919‐5930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gao D, Vahdat LT, Wong S, Chang JC, Mittal V. Microenvironmental regulation of epithelial‐mesenchymal transitions in cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72(19):4883‐4889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yanokura M, Banno K, Iida M, et al. MicroRNAS in endometrial cancer: recent advances and potential clinical applications. EXCLI J. 2015;14:190‐198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sun X, Wang M, Liu H, Wang J. MicroRNA‐423 enhances the invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma via regulation of BRMS1. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(12):5576‐5584. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Guan G, Zhang D, Zheng Y, et al. microRNA‐423‐3p promotes tumor progression via modulation of AdipoR2 in laryngeal carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(9):5683‐5691. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wang R, Li G, Zhuang G, Sun S, Song Z. Overexpression of microRNA‐423‐3p indicates poor prognosis and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14(1):53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Chen X, Fan Z, McGee W, et al. TDP‐43 regulates cancer‐associated microRNAs. Protein Cell. 2018;9(10):848‐866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sun G, Ding X, Bi N, et al. MiR‐423‐5p in brain metastasis: potential role in diagnostics and molecular biology. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(10):936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Sun G, Ding X, Bi N, et al. Molecular predictors of brain metastasis‐related microRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(2):e1007888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 62. Nishikawa R, Goto Y, Kojima S, et al. Tumor‐suppressive microRNA‐29s inhibit cancer cell migration and invasion via targeting LAMC1 in prostate cancer. Int J Oncol. 2014;45(1):401‐410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ke J, Tian J, Li J, et al. Identification of a functional polymorphism affecting microRNA binding in the susceptibility locus 1q25.3 for colorectal cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56(9):2014‐2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Dai T, Zhao X, Li Y, et al. miR‐423 promotes breast cancer invasion by activating NF‐κB signaling. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5467‐5478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985‐999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Borges DP, Cunha‐Neto E, Bocchi EA, Rigaud VOC. Impact of delayed whole blood processing time on plasma levels of miR‐ 1 and miR‐423‐5p up to 24 hours. Microrna. 2018;7(2):115‐119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Yan W, Liu Y, Yang P, Wang Z, You Y, Jiang T. MicroRNA profiling of Chinese primary glioblastoma reveals a temozolomide‐chemoresistant subtype. Oncotarget. 2015;6(13):11676‐11682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Xia W, Liu Y, Du Y, Cheng T, Hu X, Li X. MicroRNA‐423 drug resistance and proliferation of breast cancer cells by targeting ZFP36. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:769‐782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 69. Wang B, Zhang Y, Ye M, Wu J, Ma L, Chen H. Cisplatin‐resistant MDA‐MB‐231 cell‐derived exosomes increase the resistance of recipient cells in an exosomal miR‐423‐5p‐dependent manner. Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20(10):804‐814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Frères P, Bouznad N, Servais L, et al. Variations of circulating cardiac biomarkers during and after anthracycline‐containing chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hu Z, Mi S, Zhao T, et al. BGL3 lncRNA mediates retention of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex at DNA damage sites. EMBO J. 2020;39:e104133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Liu J, Liu ZX, Wu QN, et al. Long noncoding RNA AGPG regulates PFKFB3‐mediated tumor glycolytic reprogramming. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Gonzalez‐Moro I, Olazagoitia‐Garmendia A, Colli ML, et al. The T1D‐associated lncRNA Lnc13 modulates human pancreatic beta cell inflammation by allele‐specific stabilization of STAT1 mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:9022‐9031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Guo CJ, Ma XK, Xing YH, et al. Distinct processing of lncRNAs contributes to non‐conserved functions in stem cells. Cell. 2020;181(3):621‐636.e22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Yin Y, Lu JY, Zhang X, et al. U1 snRNP regulates chromatin retention of noncoding RNAs. Nature. 2020;580(7801):147‐150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Schertzer MD, Braceros KCA, Starmer J, et al. lncRNA‐induced spread of polycomb controlled by genome architecture, RNA abundance, and CpG island DNA. Mol Cell. 2019;75(3):523‐537.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bhan A, Soleimani M, Mandal SS. Long noncoding RNA and Cancer: a new paradigm. Cancer Res. 2017;77(15):3965‐3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Wang W, Hu W, Wang Y, et al. Long non‐coding RNA UCA1 promotes malignant phenotypes of renal cancer cells by modulating the miR‐182‐5p/DLL4 axis as a ceRNA. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Ma J, Yan H, Zhang J, Tan Y, Gu W. Long‐chain non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) MT1JP suppresses biological activities of lung cancer by regulating miRNA‐423‐3p/Bim axis. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:5114‐5126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Yu Z, Zhao H, Feng X, et al. Long non‐coding RNA FENDRR acts as a miR‐423‐5p sponge to suppress the Treg‐mediated immune escape of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;17:516‐529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sun X, Huang T, Zhang C, et al. Long non‐coding RNA LINC00968 reduces cell proliferation and migration and angiogenesis in breast cancer through up‐regulation of PROX1 by reducing hsa‐miR‐423‐5p. Cell Cycle. 2019;18(16):1908‐1924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 82. Chen X, Xu H, Sun G, Zhang Y. LncRNA CASC9 affects cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of tongue squamous cell carcinoma via regulating miR‐423‐5p/SOX12 axes. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:277‐287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Li W, Zhang B, Jia Y, et al. LncRNA LOXL1‐AS1 regulates the tumorigenesis and development of lung adenocarcinoma through sponging miR‐423‐5p and targeting MYBL2. Cancer Med. 2020;9(2):689‐699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yang C, Liu Z, Chang X, et al. NR2F1‐AS1 regulated miR‐423‐5p/SOX12 to promote proliferation and invasion of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121(2):2009‐2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Du W, Feng Z, Sun Q. LncRNA LINC00319 accelerates ovarian cancer progression through miR‐423‐5p/NACC1 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2018;507(1–4):198‐202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lian YU, Xiong F, Yang L, et al. Long noncoding RNA AFAP1‐AS1 acts as a competing endogenous RNA of miR‐423‐5p to facilitate nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis through regulating the Rho/Rac pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Luo Y, Tan W, Jia W, et al. The long non‐coding RNA LINC01606 contributes to the metastasis and invasion of human gastric cancer and is associated with Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;103:125‐134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Jiang Y, Zhang H, Li W, Yan Y, Yao X, Gu W. LINC01426 contributes to clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression by modulating CTBP1/miR‐423‐5p/FOXM1 axis via interacting with IGF2BP1. J Cell Physiol. 2020. 10.1002/jcp.29871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Tan H, Bao J, Zhou X. Genome‐wide mutational spectra analysis reveals significant cancer‐specific heterogeneity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Tan H. The association between gene SNPs and cancer predisposition: correlation or causality? EBioMedicine. 2017;16:8‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ding HX, Lv Z, Yuan Y, Xu Q. MiRNA polymorphisms and cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Front Oncol. 2018;8:596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Moazeni‐Roodi A, Ghavami S, Hashemi M. Association between miR‐423 rs6505162 polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer. Arch Med Res. 2019;50(1):21‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Guled M, Lahti L, Lindholm PM, et al. CDKN2A, NF2, and JUN are dysregulated among other genes by miRNAs in malignant mesothelioma ‐a miRNA microarray analysis. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2009;48(7):615‐623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Hui AB, Lenarduzzi M, Krushel T, et al. Comprehensive MicroRNA profiling for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(4):1129‐1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Lerman G, Avivi C, Mardoukh C, et al. MiRNA expression in psoriatic skin: reciprocal regulation of hsa‐miR‐99a and IGF‐1R. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Jiao L, Zhang J, Dong Y, et al. Association between miR‐125a rs12976445 and survival in breast cancer patients. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6(6):869‐875. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Hu Y, Yu CY, Wang JL, Guan J, Chen HY, Fang JY. MicroRNA sequence polymorphisms and the risk of different types of cancer. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. He B, Pan Y, Xu Y, et al. Associations of polymorphisms in microRNAs with female breast cancer risk in Chinese population. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(6):4575‐4582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Morales S, Gulppi F, Gonzalez‐Hormazabal P, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Pre‐miR‐27a, Pre‐miR‐196a2, Pre‐miR‐423, miR‐608 and Pre‐miR‐618 with breast cancer susceptibility in a South American population. BMC Genet. 2016;17(1):109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Smith RA, Jedlinski DJ, Gabrovska PN, Weinstein SR, Haupt L, Griffiths LR. A genetic variant located in miR‐423 is associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2012;9(3):115‐118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Umar M, Upadhyay R, Prakash G, Kumar S, Ghoshal UC, Mittal B. Evaluation of common genetic variants in pre‐microRNA in susceptibility and prognosis of esophageal cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52(Suppl 1):E10‐E18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Yin Z, Cui Z, Ren Y, et al. Association between polymorphisms in pre‐miRNA genes and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese non‐smoking female population. Lung Cancer. 2016;94:15‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Yang H, Dinney CP, Ye Y, Zhu Y, Grossman HB, Wu X. Evaluation of genetic variants in microRNA‐related genes and risk of bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(7):2530‐2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Chen R, Zheng Y, Zhuo L, Wang S. The association between miR‐423 rs6505162 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(25):40204‐40213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Su X, Hu YI, Li Y, et al. The polymorphism of rs6505162 in the MIR423 coding region and recurrent pregnancy loss. Reproduction. 2015;150(1):65‐76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Ye Y, Wang KK, Gu J, et al. Genetic variations in microRNA‐related genes are novel susceptibility loci for esophageal cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008;1(6):460‐469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Wang Y, Vogelsang M, Schafer G, Matejcic M, Parker MI. MicroRNA polymorphisms and environmental smoke exposure as risk factors for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Yin J, Wang X, Zheng L, et al. Hsa‐miR‐34b/c rs4938723 T>C and hsa‐miR‐423 rs6505162 C>A polymorphisms are associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese population. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Nariman‐Saleh‐Fam Z, Bastami M, Somi MH, et al. miRNA‐related polymorphisms in miR‐423 (rs6505162) and PEX6 (rs1129186) and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an Iranian cohort. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017;21(6):382‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Guo X, Zhao L, Shen Y, Shao Y, Wei W, Liu F. Polymorphism of miRNA and esophageal cancer risk: an updated systemic review and meta‐analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:3565‐3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Yin Z, Cui Z, Guan P, et al. Interaction between polymorphisms in Pre‐MiRNA genes and cooking oil fume exposure on the risk of lung cancer in Chinese non‐smoking female population. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Yoon K‐A, Yoon H, Park S, et al. The prognostic impact of microRNA sequence polymorphisms on the recurrence of patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(4):794‐807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhao X, et al. Association of two microRNA polymorphisms miR‐27 rs895819 and miR‐423 rs6505162 with the risk of cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):46969‐46980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Pollard J, Burns P, Hughes T, et al. Differential expression of micrornas in breast cancers from four different ethnicities. Pathobiology. 2018;85(4):220‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Rah H, Kim HS, Cha SH, et al. Association of breast cancer‐related microRNA polymorphisms with idiopathic primary ovarian insufficiency. Menopause. 2015;22(4):437‐443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Chen QH, Wang QB, Zhang B. Ethnicity modifies the association between functional microRNA polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a HuGE meta‐analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(1):529‐543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Xing J, Wan S, Zhou F, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in pre‐microRNA genes as prognostic markers of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(1):217‐227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Jia W, Zeng L, Luo S, et al. Association of microRNA‐423 rs6505162 C>A polymorphism with susceptibility and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Medicine. 2018;97(6):e9846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ma Y, Wang R, Zhang J, et al. Identification of miR‐423 and miR‐499 polymorphisms on affecting the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a large‐scale population. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014;18(7):516‐524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Jiang J, Jia ZF, Cao DH, Wu YH, Sun ZW, Cao XY. Association of the miR‐146a rs2910164 polymorphism with gastric cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Future Oncol. 2016;12(19):2215‐2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Stenholm L, Stoehlmacher‐Williams J, Al‐Batran SE, et al. Prognostic role of microRNA polymorphisms in advanced gastric cancer: a translational study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2581‐2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Cortez MA, Bueso‐Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez‐Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA. MicroRNAs in body fluids–the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nature Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(8):467‐477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Nair VS, Maeda LS, Ioannidis JP. Clinical outcome prediction by microRNAs in human cancer: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(7):528‐540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Chang YA, Weng SL, Yang SF, et al. A three‐microRNA signature as a potential biomarker for the early detection of oral cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Roy R, Singh R, Chattopadhyay E, et al. MicroRNA and target gene expression based clustering of oral cancer, precancer and normal tissues. Gene. 2016;593(1):58‐63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Zhu Y, Li T, Chen G, et al. Identification of a serum microRNA expression signature for detection of lung cancer, involving miR‐23b, miR‐221, miR‐148b and miR‐423‐3p. Lung Cancer. 2017;114:6‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. An Y, Gao S, Zhao WC, et al. Novel serum microRNAs panel on the diagnostic and prognostic implications of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(24):2596‐2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Nilsen A, Jonsson M, Aarnes EK, Kristensen GB, Lyng H. Reference microRNAs for RT‐qPCR assays in cervical cancer patients and their application to studies of HPV16 and hypoxia biomarkers. Transl Oncol. 2019;12(3):576‐584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Lu X, Lu J. The significance of detection of serum miR‐423‐5p and miR‐484 for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Clin Lab. 2015;61(1–2):187‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Fang Z, Tang J, Bai Y, et al. Plasma levels of microRNA‐24, microRNA‐320a, and microRNA‐423‐5p are potential biomarkers for colorectal carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Research. 2015;34:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Murria Estal R, Palanca Suela S, de Juan Jiménez I, et al. MicroRNA signatures in hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(1):19‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Du L, Jiang X, Duan W, et al. Cell‐free microRNA expression signatures in urine serve as novel noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and recurrence prediction of bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(25):40832‐40842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Liu R, Zhang C, Hu Z, et al. A five‐microRNA signature identified from genome‐wide serum microRNA expression profiling serves as a fingerprint for gastric cancer diagnosis. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(5):784‐791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
