Critical illness syndromes like sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been defined using clinical criteria that are easy to apply.[1-3] However, this has left ARDS with high heterogeneity and poor recognition.[4-6] Unfortunately, in patients that die after a diagnosis of ARDS, there appears to be poor correlation with the original pathologic description of diffuse alveolar damage.[7] This heterogeneity and poor specificity may have contributed to the paucity of successful clinical trials in critical care, despite promising pre-clinical interventions. Biomarkers have been proposed to reduce heterogeneity in sepsis and ARDS in both adults and children, most commonly using peripherally circulating protein markers.[8-20] However, for primarily pulmonary processes like ARDS and pediatric ARDS (PARDS), a criticism of this approach is the possibility that investigators are sampling the wrong compartment. Specifically, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in pediatric intubated respiratory failure is uncommon, limiting the number of biomarker studies which sample the lower respiratory tract of children.
In this issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Halstead and colleagues report their work, “Cytokine Panels and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Translational Investigation” (21). This was a translational study that measured chemokines in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in a murine infectious lung injury model, and then sought to validate the findings in children with acute respiratory failure due to respiratory tract infections. C57BL6/J mice were treated with intranasal influenza A or Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists (TLR-4 and −2). Children were 0-17 years old, admitted to a single center pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from April 2015 to March 2019, intubated and mechanically ventilated with laboratory evidence of respiratory tract infection, and control patients were intubated for surgical procedures. Respiratory tract fluids were obtained in subjects and controls by tracheal aspirate or mini-BAL.
The authors found changes in inflammatory biomarkers consistent with previous murine models of infection and ARDS. They investigated the kinetics and performed analyses to account for BALF dilution. Their data suggest that elevated CCL7 levels in serum and BALF at the peak of inflammation correlated with lethality in mice, and that the BALF ratio of CCL7:CCL22 had the strongest association with mortality with good sensitivity and specificity. The pediatric respiratory infection cohort data showed that CCL7 was not commonly found in respiratory tract fluids, but that its presence was associated with worse outcome measured by ventilator free days.
Discovery of biomarkers that improve pediatric respiratory failure and PARDS prognostication has been the focus of recent research.[20, 22-29] Despite the enthusiasm for biomarkers for trial enrichment and for reducing heterogeneity, the utility of any of these biomarkers have yet to be demonstrated in critical illness. Although several biomarkers have been associated with higher mortality, less than 20% of children with PARDS die. More common is severe morbidity from PARDS related to prolonged mechanical ventilation and its associated complications. Many of the implicated biomarkers reflect severity of inflammation or degree of organ failure, without necessarily being causal for either. Biomarkers that improve understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving severity of lung injury and identify children at higher risk for prolonged ventilation may be more relevant in pediatrics. It is plausible that examination of lower respiratory tract fluids is required to identify biomarkers most likely to be associated with severity of lung injury.
This highlights another promising feature of the manuscript by Halstead et al (21): its willingness to move from bench to bedside. Ultimately, differentiation of biomarkers which are worth targeting versus those which are merely distracting bystanders requires interventional studies in pre-clinical models. Progress in this space requires increased multidisciplinary collaboration between the basic scientists, the clinical investigators, and their translational link.
The manuscript by Halstead et al in this issue of PCCM is another step towards improved prognostication of children with respiratory failure and PARDS. Small endotracheal tube sizes and the inability to place a bronchoscope with an instillation and suction ports have been a persistent problem for advancing knowledge in the field of pediatric lung injury. The ability to identify a potentially promising inflammatory biomarker with suboptimal sampling techniques (relative to BAL), particularly one with a possible correlation with outcome, is notable. Certainly, tracheal aspiration (TA) is a universal procedure, and several institutes perform mini-BAL routinely. In the mouse studies in this manuscript, BAL levels approximately mirrored serum levels. However, the authors did not differentiate the patients in whom tracheal aspirate versus mini-BAL was performed. Studies have shown that TA is less sensitive than mini-BAL in detecting lower respiratory tract pathogens in adults.[30] In addition, although mini-BAL (nonbronchoscopic or nondirected BAL) has been shown to be safe in adults, this procedure is not free of risk and there are conflicting data regarding whether it reliably samples the lower respiratory tract.[31-35]
Despite the fact that neither tracheal aspirates nor mini-BAL are precisely sampling the alveolar space, this study represents an advancement in biomarker studies of pediatric respiratory failure by moving beyond the blood compartment, while simultaneously highlighting the challenges associated with recovering lower respiratory tract fluid in children. Future studies should explicitly compare simultaneously collected blood and respiratory samples with promising candidate cytokines. This will disentangle which biomarkers may be informative of a pulmonary-specific inflammatory process, versus which markers may simply reflect overall systemic inflammation.
Footnotes
Copyright form disclosure: Dr. Yehya’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and he received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Contributor Information
Lincoln S. Smith, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Anoopindar Bhalla, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Nadir Yehya, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
References
- 1.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J-D, Coopersmith CM et al. : The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). In: JAMA. vol. 315; 2016: 801–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. In: JAMA. vol. 307; 2012: 2526–2533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khemani RG, Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ, Erickson S, Group ftPALICC: Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Definition, Incidence, and Epidemiology: Proceedings From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2015, 16(5_suppl):S23–S40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF et al. : Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2016, 315(8):788–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Killien E, Huijsmans R, Ticknor I, Vavilala M, Watson R, Smith L, Qiu Q, Rivara F: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following Pediatric Trauma: Application of Palicc Criteria. Crit Care Med 2019, 47(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bellani G, Pham T, Laffey JG: Missed or delayed diagnosis of ARDS: a common and serious problem. Intensive Care Med 2020, 46(6):1180–1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cardinal-Fernández P, Lorente JA, Ballén-Barragán A, Matute-Bello G: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Diffuse Alveolar Damage. New Insights on a Complex Relationship. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2017, 14(6):844–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calfee CS, Ware LB, Glidden DV, Eisner MD, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Matthay MA, National Heart B, and Lung Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Use of risk reclassification with multiple biomarkers improves mortality prediction in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2011, 39(4):711–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA, Network NA: Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2014, 2(8):611–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prescott HC, Calfee CS, Thompson BT, Angus DC, Liu VX: Toward Smarter Lumping and Smarter Splitting: Rethinking Strategies for Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trial Design. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016, 194(2):147–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang C, Zhang C, Yang H, Gao R, Tong Z: Lung fluid biomarkers for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care 2019, 23(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kitsios GD, Yang L, Manatakis DV, Nouraie M, Evankovich J, Bain W, Dunlap DG, Shah F, Barbash IJ, Rapport SF et al. : Host-Response Subphenotypes Offer Prognostic Enrichment in Patients With or at Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome*. Crit Care Med 2019, 47(12):1724–1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bime C, Casanova N, Oita RC, Ndukum J, Lynn H, Camp SM, Lussier Y, Abraham I, Carter D, Miller EJ et al. : Development of a biomarker mortality risk model in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical care (London, England) 2019, 23(1):410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao Z, Wickersham N, Kangelaris KN, May AK, Bernard GR, Matthay MA, Calfee CS, Koyama T, Ware LB: External validation of a biomarker and clinical prediction model for hospital mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2017, 43(8):1123–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Orwoll BE, Sapru A: Biomarkers in Pediatric ARDS: Future Directions. Frontiers in pediatrics 2016, 4:765–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimura D, Saravia J, Rovnaghi CR, Meduri GU, Schwingshackl A, Cormier SA, Anand KJ: Plasma Biomarker Analysis in Pediatric ARDS: Generating Future Framework from a Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Methylprednisolone: A Framework for Identifying Plasma Biomarkers Related to Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric ARDS. Frontiers in pediatrics 2016, 4(18):1334–1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blondonnet R, Constantin J-M, Sapin V, Jabaudon M: A Pathophysiologic Approach to Biomarkers in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Dis Markers 2016, 2016(21):3501373–3501320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wong HR, Sweeney TE, Hart KW, Khatri P, Lindsell CJ: Pediatric Sepsis Endotypes Among Adults With Sepsis. Crit Care Med 2017, 45(12):e1289–e1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wong HR, Cvijanovich NZ, Anas N, Allen GL, Thomas NJ, Bigham MT, Weiss SL, Fitzgerald J, Checchia PA, Meyer K et al. : Developing a Clinically Feasible Personalized Medicine Approach to Pediatric Septic Shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015, 191(3):309–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yehya N, Wong HR: Adaptation of a Biomarker-Based Sepsis Mortality Risk Stratification Tool for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Med 2018, 46(1):e9–e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McKeone DJ, Mathewson M, Dalal PG, et al. : Cytokine Panels and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Translational Investigation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; in press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sapru A, Calfee CS, Liu KD, Kangelaris K, Hansen H, Pawlikowska L, Ware LB, Alkhouli MF, Abbott J, Abbot J et al. : Plasma soluble thrombomodulin levels are associated with mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2015, 41(3):470–478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sapru A, Curley MAQ, Brady S, Matthay MA, Flori H: Elevated PAI-1 is associated with poor clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36(1):157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Spicer AC, Calfee CS, Zinter MS, Khemani RG, Lo VP, Alkhouli MF, Orwoll BE, Graciano AL, Boriosi JP, Howard JP et al. : A Simple and Robust Bedside Model for Mortality Risk in Pediatric Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2016, 17(10):907–916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zinter MS, Delucchi KL, Kong MY, Orwoll BE, Spicer AS, Lim MJ, Alkhouli MF, Ratiu AE, McKenzie AV, McQuillen PS et al. : Early Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase Profiles: A Novel Pathway in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018, 199(2):181–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zinter MS, Spicer A, Orwoll BO, Alkhouli M, Dvorak CC, Calfee CS, Matthay MA, Sapru A: Plasma angiopoietin-2 outperforms other markers of endothelial injury in prognosticating pediatric ARDS mortality. American journal of physiology Lung cellular and molecular physiology 2016, 310(3):L224–L231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Flori HR, Ware LB, Milet M, Matthay MA: Early elevation of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen in pediatric acute lung injury is associated with an increased risk of death and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2007, 8(2):96–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Flori HR, Ware LB, Matthay MA: Early elevation of plasma soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in pediatric acute lung injury identifies patients at increased risk of death and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Pediatric critical care medicine 2003, 4(3):315–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yehya N, Thomas NJ, Meyer NJ, Christie JD, Berg RA, Margulies SS: Circulating markers of endothelial and alveolar epithelial dysfunction are associated with mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2016, 42(7):1137–1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Neves CP, Costa AG, Safe IP, de Souza Brito A, Jesus JS, Kritski AL, Lacerda MVG, Viveiros M, Cordeiro-Santos M: The role of mini-bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in critically ill patients. BMC Infect Dis 2020, 20(1):229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Perkins GD, Chatterjie S, McAuley DF, Gao F, Thickett DR: Role of nonbronchoscopic lavage for investigating alveolar inflammation and permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2006, 34(1):57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tasbakan MS, Gurgun A, Basoglu OK, Ekren PK, Pullukcu H, Bacakoglu F: Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage and mini-bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases 2011, 81(3):229–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bonvento BV, Rooney JA, Columb MO, McGrath BA, Bentley AM, Felton TW: Non-directed bronchial lavage is a safe method for sampling the respiratory tract in critically ill patient. Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2019, 20(3):237–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Burmester M, Mok Q: How safe is non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill mechanically ventilated children? Intensive Care Medicine 2001, 27(4):716–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meyer P, Rousseau H, Maillet JM, Thierry S, Sy O, Vicaut E, Thiolliere F, Choukroun G, Chergui K, Chevrel G et al. : Evaluation of blind nasotracheal suctioning and non-bronchoscopic mini-bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill patients with infectious pneumonia: a preliminary study. Respir Care 2014, 59(3):345–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]