Multiple distinct tomograms of a single β cell enable investigation of the architecture of insulin vesicle neighborhoods.
Abstract
Subcellular neighborhoods, comprising specific ratios of organelles and proteins, serve a multitude of biological functions and are of particular importance in secretory cells. However, the role of subcellular neighborhoods in insulin vesicle maturation is poorly understood. Here, we present single-cell multiple distinct tomogram acquisitions of β cells for in situ visualization of distinct subcellular neighborhoods that are involved in the insulin vesicle secretory pathway. We propose that these neighborhoods play an essential role in the specific function of cellular material. In the regions where we observed insulin vesicles, a measurable increase in both the fraction of cellular volume occupied by vesicles and the average size (diameter) of the vesicles was apparent as sampling moved from the area near the nucleus toward the plasma membrane. These findings describe the important role of the nanometer-scale organization of subcellular neighborhoods on insulin vesicle maturation.
INTRODUCTION
Subcellular neighborhoods consist of groupings of specialized organelles and proteins that have one or more specific jobs to perform in the cell. The temporal and spatial distribution of these neighborhoods is essential for a multitude of biological functions, including protein production, maturation, and transport (1). Insulin is a peptide hormone produced by pancreatic β cells that is released when blood glucose levels rise (2). Insulin vesicle production and properly timed secretion are the most critical functions of β cells, with loss or misregulation leading to diabetes mellitus (3, 4). Glucose-induced insulin secretion is a complex process that requires the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi, mitochondrial, cytoskeletal, and membrane fusion machinery work synergistically. However, fundamental questions remain about how these different components act together to orchestrate insulin secretion.
Three-dimensional (3D) electron tomography (ET), particularly of thin sections embedded in plastic, has been used to visualize the structures of β cell organelles (5–8). These studies have revealed, for instance, that mature insulin vesicles have a dark, electron-dense core surrounded by a halo (9, 10). However, experimental artifacts from damage to or deformation of organelles introduced during sample preparation—a process that includes chemical fixation, dehydration, embedding, and staining (5, 7, 11)—have the potential to skew results and obscure important details. Thus, techniques to visualize the subcellular architecture in a near-native state are required to further our understanding of the context of the subcellular neighborhood interactions.
Cryo-ET has become standard for visualizing the 3D macromolecular organization of cells in an unperturbed context in situ by sample preservation through plunge freezing (12–15). Yet, because of the extreme radiation sensitivity of biological samples, montage cryo-ET has not been possible, and observations have been limited to just a miniscule fraction (hundredths of one percent) of the overall cell. We overcome these limitations by recording multiple tomograms from single cells, resulting in a census of subcellular structure at high resolution (16). By combining cryo-ET with cryo–focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling, we collected tens of tomograms from distinct regions along the secretory pathway of individual β cells to closely examine the subcellular neighborhoods and to visualize insulin vesicle maturation in situ at high resolution. Here, we provide perspective on the distinct roles of these subcellular constituents and their surrounding neighborhoods on insulin vesicle development and trafficking.
RESULTS
Mapping the β cell structure by single-cell multiple distinct tomogram acquisition
We imaged INS-1E cells, a rat insulinoma pancreatic β cell line that is amenable to prolonged and consistent cell culturing and displays stable differentiated β cell phenotypes over a hundred cell passages. The glucose dose-response curve of INS-1E cells is similar to that of rat islets, suggesting that their insulin secretion pathways are comparable (17, 18). To obtain a more complete picture of insulin secretion, we first collected a high-magnification 2D montage of the cell and used this as a map to target areas sufficient for cryo-ET imaging. We collected tens of tomograms from the thin peripheries of an individual cell, mapping the positions of the areas studied on a high-magnification view of the cell (Fig. 1A and fig. S1A). To image regions deeper in the interior of cells, we used cryo-FIB milling (19, 20) to generate 180- to 250-nm-thick lamellae suitable for cryo-ET (Fig. 1B and fig. S1B). In 2D projection images from these lamellae, as a map, we could easily recognize the nucleus, ER, Golgi apparatus, and mitochondria. Multiple tomograms were recorded in different locations across the milled section of each lamella to develop a more complete view of the cell.
Fig. 1. Single-cell multiple distinct tomogram acquisition with cryo-FIB milling and cryo-ET.
(A) Multiple distinct tomograms acquired from the peripheral region of a single INS-1E cell with cryo-ET. 2D montage image of a cell grown on an electron microscopy (EM) grid. Boxes in blue (3 to 6 μm from the PM) and orange (2 μm from the PM) identify areas selected for tilt series image acquisition. Selected tomograms to illustrate the cellular ultrastructure from the indicated regions are shown (left and right). (B) Multiple distinct tomogram collection from a single lamella in the central region of the cell using cryo-FIB milling and cryo-ET. With the NM outlined in blue, boxes in green (3 to 8 μm from the NM) and yellow (at the NM) identify areas selected for tilt series image acquisition. (C) Cartoon map of the insulin vesicle secretory pathway and high-resolution cell structure. With this scheme, features including the nucleus, ER, Golgi, mitochondria, cytoskeleton, vesicles, and ribosomes revealed by tomograms can be mapped back into the cell (scale bars, 200 nm in tomographic slices).
In total, 123 tomograms were recorded from the periphery of six cells, and 20 tomograms from a single β cell were selected for analysis. Thirty-seven tomograms of 10 lamellae from the interior of 10 cells were recorded, and 5 tomograms of separate lamellae from 3 distinct cells were selected for analysis (fig. S2 and table S1). Tomograms that show the stages of the phenotype we are interested in examining were selected and allowed us to collectively visualize the entire insulin vesicle secretion pathway. We consistently observed small vesicles around the ER and Golgi, presumably containing insulin and other proteins, as well as insulin-containing vesicles in the cytoplasm near the plasma membrane (PM) (Fig. 1C and movie S1).
Characterization of the ER and Golgi apparatus
The ER in Fig. 2A was observed 2 μm from the nuclear membrane (NM), and both the tubular ER matrices with three-way junctions and fenestrated ER sheets were evident, as previously observed with superresolution light-sheet microscopy (21). We observed coat protein (COP)–coated vesicles in different stages of maturation: partially coated budding or fusing profiles at the ER and fully coated COP vesicles in the cytoplasm at the periphery of the ER (Fig. 2B and fig. S3).
Fig. 2. High-resolution structure of the ER and Golgi apparatus in INS-1E cells.
(A and B) Slices through a tomogram showing the ER from different angles. Yellow arrows point to holes in the ER matrix, red asterisks show the tubular ER, and red arrows point to coat protein (COP)–coated vesicles. (C) Slice through a tomogram showing the Golgi apparatus. (D) 3D segmentation of the tomogram in (C) with color key shown at the bottom. (E and F) Close-up views of (D) showing 25- to 50-nm-diameter holes (white arrows) throughout the Golgi cisternae (E) and MTs passing through the Golgi body (F). (G) Representative tomographic slice showing an MT (red arrow) passing through the Golgi body [scale bars, 100 nm in (A), (B), and (E) to (G) and 200 nm in (C) and (D)].
While the architecture of the Golgi apparatus has been well defined in previous studies (6, 22, 23), our results provide additional insights. The Golgi shown in the tomogram in Fig. 2C is representative of our observations and was recorded 4 μm from the NM. The overall architecture comprises multiple parallel flat cisternae and transport vesicles (Fig. 2, C and D, and movie S2). The number of cisternae is different in different species, and seven cisternae are apparent in Fig. 2C. While the Chlamydomonas Golgi has approximately nine cisternae (23), our mammalian INS-1E cells typically exhibited five to seven cisternae. The intracisternal protein array observed in the Chlamydomonas Golgi was not found in our mammalian INS-1E cells. The cisternae had 25- to 50-nm-diameter holes (Fig. 2E), which is consistent with previous findings (24). Unexpectedly, we found microtubules (MTs) passing through the Golgi apparatus in samples from several different cells (Fig. 2, F and G).
Insulin vesicles and their subcellular neighborhoods
Insulin vesicles are known to mature as they migrate toward the PM after release from the trans-Golgi. Light microscopy revealed that the cells were polarized and highly irregular in shape. The distance between the NM and PM in the horizontal plane ranged between 1 and 35 μm (fig. S4). We categorized this space into regions to evaluate differences in vesicle development across three subcellular microenvironments along the secretory pathway in INS-1E cells (25): region 1, just distal from the Golgi (approximately 3 to 8 μm from the NM examined in 5 tomograms of lamellae from three different cells); region 2, approximately midway between region 1 and the PM (3 to 6 μm from the PM in 10 tomograms of the periphery of one cell); and region 3, adjacent to the PM (within 2 μm of the PM in 10 tomograms of the periphery of one cell) (fig. S5). Both types of membrane landmarks, NM and PM, were needed as reference points because PMs were not usually visible in the atlases of lamellae, and NMs were not typically visible in atlases of the cell periphery. Representative tomograms from each of the three regions are shown in Fig. 3 (see also movies S3 to S5 and fig. S2). Distal to the Golgi, the ER formed ribbons and sheets (Fig. 3A) that were different from its more tubular morphology closer to the NM. Ribosomes were apparent in each of these different regions. However, the cellular content changed noticeably in areas closer to the cell’s periphery, the ultimate destination of the insulin vesicle for its final role in secretion. Our tomograms show that the cellular content in the region within 2 μm of the β cell’s PM is dominated by the presence of insulin vesicles, both immature and mature, as well as ribosomes.
Fig. 3. Visualizing insulin vesicle maturation and subcellular organization in situ.
(A) Tomographic slice of an INS-1E cell thinned by cryo-FIB milling that is representative of region 1, the area between 3 and 8 μm from the NM (left). Segmentation of the tomographic data (right, color key below). (B) Representative tomographic slice of region 2, the area between 3 and 6 μm from the PM. (C) Representative tomographic slice of region 3, the area within 2 μm from the PM. (D) Relative percentage of mature and immature insulin vesicles quantified in the three regions of the cells studied. (E) Median diameter of insulin vesicles within each of the three regions in the cell; boxplot shows 25 to 75% quantile. ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant in t test (and nonparametric tests). (F) Bar plot showing the fraction of insulin vesicle volume to tomogram volume (blue) and number of insulin vesicles per tomogram volume (orange) at the three regions [for (D) to (F): region 1 samples, n = 25 vesicles from five tomograms of five different cells; region 2 samples, n = 116 vesicles from 10 tomograms from one cell; region 3 samples, n = 130 vesicles from 10 tomograms from one cell] [scale bars, 200 nm in (A) to (C)].
Previous studies have shown that insulin crystallizes inside vesicles during the maturation process (26). We classified the vesicles in our tomograms as either mature or immature based on the presence or absence of a dense core. Both immature and mature insulin vesicles were seen in all three regions, but the percentage of mature insulin vesicles increased from 12% at the cell interior to 32% at the regions closer to the PM (Fig. 3D) in the cells that we studied. At the same time, the average diameter of the insulin vesicles increased from 196 ± 42 nm to 266 ± 52 nm (Fig. 3E). In the regions where insulin vesicles were observed in cells, they were packed with increasing density toward the periphery; the number of insulin vesicles per μm3 increased from 16 to 51 and the fraction of the volume occupied by insulin vesicles increased from 0.07 to 0.56 (Fig. 3F) across the three regions in our samples.
Metal cluster deposit
Solid-phase calcium stores are known to exist in the mitochondrial matrices of a variety of mammalian cell types (27). Here, we observed solid-phase calcium stores in the matrices of mitochondria in the periphery of β cells, but none in mitochondria in any of the 11 lamellae that we collected near the nucleus (Fig. 4, A and B). In ~10% of insulin vesicles, we observed one or two metal clusters, both within immature and mature vesicles (Fig. 4, C to F, and movie S6). These clusters contained 3- to 8-nm particles and ranged from 30 to 90 nm in diameter. Within immature insulin vesicles, the locations of these clusters appeared random, while within mature insulin vesicles they tended to be located very close or attached to the insulin crystal.
Fig. 4. Metal clusters within mitochondria and insulin vesicles.
(A and B) Tomographic slices showing mitochondria from the peripheral and central parts of the INS-1E cell, respectively. Red arrows indicate calcium stores. (C and D) Representative tomographic slices showing metal clusters (red arrows) in immature insulin vesicles. (E and F) Representative tomographic slices of metal clusters in mature insulin vesicles. Insulin vesicle membrane (purple), insulin crystal (gray), and metal cluster (gold) are segmented below [scale bars, 200 nm in (A) and (B) and 100 nm in (C) to (F)].
DISCUSSION
Our single-cell multiple distinct tomogram study of β cells creates a biased census of components within the subcellular neighborhoods. To eliminate bias in future studies, regions/neighborhoods would be more appropriately sampled either randomly or systematically for more meaningful interpretation with better statistical representation and biological meaning. Furthermore, combining with another whole-cell imaging method, soft x-ray tomography, can give us much better and comprehensive knowledge about the cellular architecture of the whole-cell (28). These manually selected regions illustrate insulin vesicle maturation and trafficking in situ to serve as a pilot study toward deeper statistical analysis. We found that vesicles are larger, are packed more closely, and develop increasingly electron-dense crystalline cores as they move within the cell from the trans-Golgi to the PM. The average diameter of the insulin vesicles increased, revealing that vesicles were either fusing or more lipids were being added as they trafficked toward the PM. While it is not understood why β cells store so many insulin vesicles and release less than 5% of them quickly after glucose stimulation (29), our analysis suggests that this may be accounted for by the limited number of vesicles that are spatially located adjacent to the PM—there simply is insufficient space along the PM for more. The increasing density of insulin vesicles near the PM, as compared to their relative sparsity in more interior regions of the cell, appears to be part of a “healthy” cultured β cell’s preparation to have ample vesicles available to handle the multiple phases of insulin secretion over time following glucose stimulation. It has been shown that the first insulin vesicles to be synthesized are the first to be secreted (30), while older vesicles can be secreted under extreme stimulation or merged with lysosomes for recycling (30). While we observed differences in size, packing density (abundance), and insulin organization within the vesicles, it was not clear from our data whether these or other differences are the metrics that determine when vesicles are selected for either fusion or degradation. We speculate that the maturation and transport processes have evolved so that large, mature vesicles are abundant near the PM, where they can release large quantities of insulin.
Organization of subcellular neighborhoods within cells is key for stable cell architecture and function. For example, MTs play an important role in insulin vesicle trafficking as a path along which kinesin motors transport vesicles (31). We found multiple MTs penetrating the Golgi in our samples. The molecular mechanisms for how Golgi cisternae maintain separate yet parallel structure continues to be an area of study. There are many hypotheses about how Golgi membranes are tethered by Golgi reassembly stacking proteins (32). Our observation provides another explanation that MTs may play a role in keeping the Golgi cisternae close together, facilitating vesicle movement between cisternae, and/or localizing the Golgi within the cell.
The microenvironment or subcellular neighborhood appears to have an important role in the specific function of the organelle. Solid-phase calcium stores are known to provide a major ion reservoir in mitochondria for bioenergetics and signaling (27, 33). However, the solid calcium that was observed in mitochondria near the periphery of cells, and was absent from mitochondria near the nucleus, suggests that mitochondria in different locations (neighborhoods) within the cell occupy different roles. Therefore, while mitochondria in the vicinity of the nucleus may be more responsible for energy generation, mitochondria at the cell’s periphery may be more involved in cell signaling and communication.
We observed metal clusters within insulin vesicles that were similar in appearance to the solid-phase calcium stores in the mitochondria. These metal clusters in insulin vesicles could be zinc repositories, because zinc is known to be essential for insulin crystallization in β cells (26, 34, 35). It was previously demonstrated in an in vivo assay that insulin does not crystallize when zinc transporters are knocked out (26). Further studies are required to definitively characterize which metals comprise these clusters, but they are likely released into the bloodstream along with insulin.
Using multiple tomograms from single cells allows the visualization of more of the subcellular architecture of an entire mammalian cell than has been possible previously (36, 37). With the development of cryo-FIB lift-out techniques, we might soon be able to image lamellae from within actual tissue (38). Application of this method to studies of β cells within islets maintaining cell-cell contacts will provide context for how subcellular neighborhoods are altered in healthy and diseased states. These approaches can be used to study other cell types, such as α cells, neurons, and stem cells, and will open the door to understanding how differences in subcellular neighborhoods affect the specialized functions of various cell types throughout an organism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental design
Cell culture
INS-1E cells [from P. Maechler’s laboratory at University of Geneva (39)] were cultured in T25 flasks in Addex Bio Optimized RPMI medium [RPMI modified to contain 2 mM l-glutamine, 10 mM Hepes, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, glucose (2000 mg/liter), and sodium bicarbonate (1500 mg/liter)] containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Cells were grown within 37°C incubators with 5% CO2 at 4 × 104 cells/cm2 density and passed every 7 days, with one media change after 4 days.
Transmission electron microscopy grid preparation
Electron microscopy (EM) grids (200 mesh gold R2/2 London finder, Quantifoil Micro Tools, Germany) were coated with laminin (Sigma-Aldrich, L2020) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were plated on grids at a density of 4 × 104 cells/cm2. After 48-hour incubation, cells were treated with KREBS buffer [115 mM NaCl, 24 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Hepes, and 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (pH 7.4)] with no glucose and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The buffer was exchanged to KREBS buffer supplemented with 25 mM glucose, and cells on grids were incubated for another 30 min at 37°C. EM grids were manually blotted and plunge-frozen in a liquid ethane/propane mixture using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI) (40). Grids were stored in liquid nitrogen until the experiment was conducted.
Cryo-FIB milling
EM grids were clipped into FEI AutoGrids and mounted into an FEI Versa 3D DualBeam FIB/SEM (scanning electron microscope) instrument with a cryo-transfer system (Quorum Technologies, PP3010T). Samples were coated with platinum in the Quorum preparation chamber (10 mA, 60 s) to improve conductivity (20). The vitrified samples were imaged at 5 to 10 keV with the SEM and milled with 30-keV gallium ions by scanning the regions of interest at a 20° tilt angle. A 0.3-nA beam current was used for rough milling, followed by lower currents during the thinning procedure (41). A 10-pA current was used for the polishing step to reach the final lamella thickness.
Cryo-ET and tomogram reconstruction
The frozen grids and lamellae were imaged in a 300-keV Titan Krios microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an energy filter (Gatan) and a K3 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan). We first collected a high-magnification 2D montage of the cell periphery using SerialEM (42) and used this as a map to identify areas sufficient for cryo-ET imaging. We selected regions manually from our high-magnification montage that lacked ice contamination and were sufficiently electron-transparent for detailed analysis. We also avoided collecting on neighboring areas of the cell, which had already been exposed to electrons by previous steps. Tilt series were acquired with 2° steps between −60° and +60° (in two halves, separated at 0°). Individual tilt series were recorded at a magnification of ×26,000 or ×33,000 and a defocus of −6 to −10 μm. The cumulative dose of each tilt series was between 80 and 150 e−/Å2. Tilt series were aligned and binned by 4 using the IMOD software package (43), and 3D reconstructions were calculated using the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique implemented in the IMOD software package (44) or weighted back-projection using IMOD.
Tomogram visualization and segmentation
Segmentation was performed with Amira software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Insulin vesicles, insulin crystals, mitochondria, and ER were segmented manually using the thresholding tool. Golgi membranes were automatically segmented using the TomoSegMemTV package (45) and refined manually using Amira (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MTs and ribosomes were segmented using EMAN2 (46).
Fluorescent light microscopy
Cells were rinsed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14190144) and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with the chemical Golgi dye, 5 μM ceramide–BSA complexes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, B-22650). The samples were then rinsed several times with DPBS and incubated in a fresh medium at 37°C for a further 30 min. The sample was imaged using a 60× extra-long-working-distance air objective [Nikon CFI S Plan Fluor ELWD 60× NA (numerical aperture) 0.7 WD (working distance) 2.62 to 1.8 mm]. Images were recorded using the NIS-Elements software from AutoQuant (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY).
Statistical analysis
Statistics of diameter and volume of insulin vesicles
Twenty peripheral tomograms containing notable insulin vesicles were selected from a representative cell that had plenty of insulin vesicles for analysis. Five tomograms with notable insulin vesicles from three lamellae were selected for analysis. Computing the diameter and volume of the vesicles was difficult by direct segmentation because the complete membrane of vesicles was not visible in tomograms due to the missing wedge. As most of the vesicles appeared to be spherical, we estimated the diameter and volume from a central cross section of the vesicle as
where d and V are the diameter and volume of the insulin vesicle, respectively, and A is the area of the vesicle cross section.
Because we observed multiple vesicles at the three spatial locations described in Results (i.e., region 1, 3 to 8 μm from NM; region 2, 3 to 6 μm from PM; and region 3, 2 μm from PM), we report the average diameter as well as the complete variance in the box plot in Fig. 3E.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Chen and A. Malyutin for technical assistance with cryo–electron microscopy. Cryo–electron microscopy was performed in the Beckman Institute Resource Center for Transmission Electron Microscopy at Caltech. We thank K. Villers and C. Hanson for cell culture; W. Zhao for help with FIB milling; and C. Cato, A. Walker, and C. Oikonomou for assistance with manuscript preparation. We thank the members of the Pancreatic Beta Cell Consortium for their feedback and inspiring discussions. Funding: This work was supported by the USC Bridge Institute (R.C.S.) and NIH grant R35GM122588 to G.J.J. Author contributions: R.C.S. and G.J.J. designed the project. X.Z. prepared samples, collected and processed electron tomography data, and prepared figures and supplementary videos with help from S.D.C. J.S. helped with data analysis and prepared statistical graphs in Fig. 3. K.L.W. initiated the INS-1E cell studies and helped with the design of INS-1E experiments and biological data analysis. P.C.B. provided scientific input and helped with INS-1E cell data analysis. The manuscript was written by X.Z., J.S., R.C.S., and G.J.J. with contributions from all authors. Competing interests: R.C.S. is a founder of ShouTi, a biotech company focused on G protein–coupled receptor small-molecule drug discovery including diabetes research. R.C.S. acknowledges that his primary affiliation is with USC; he holds a secondary appointment at ShanghaiTech University/iHuman Institute. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/50/eabc8258/DC1
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.van Bergeijk P., Hoogenraad C. C., Kapitein L. C., Right time, right place: Probing the functions of organelle positioning. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 121–134 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Festa A., Williams K., Hanley A. J. G., Haffner S. M., β-Cell dysfunction in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and early type 2 diabetes: Comparison of surrogate markers with first-phase insulin secretion from an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Diabetes 57, 1638–1644 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weir G. C., Bonner-Weir S., Five stages of evolving beta-cell dysfunction during progression to diabetes. Diabetes 53 (suppl 3), S16–S21 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kahn S. E., The importance of the β-cell in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Med. 108 (suppl 6a), 2S–8S (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marsh B. J., Mastronarde D. N., Buttle K. F., Howell K. E., McIntosh J. R., Organellar relationships in the Golgi region of the pancreatic beta cell line, HIT-T15, visualized by high resolution electron tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 2399–2406 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marsh B. J., Volkmann N., McIntosh J. R., Howell K. E., Direct continuities between cisternae at different levels of the Golgi complex in glucose-stimulated mouse islet beta cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 5565–5570 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xue Y., Zhao W., Du W., Zhang X., Ji G., Ying W., Xu T., Ultra-structural study of insulin granules in pancreatic β-cells of db/db mouse by scanning transmission electron microscopy tomography. Protein Cell 3, 521–525 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suloway C., Pulokas J., Fellmann D., Cheng A., Guerra F., Quispe J., Stagg S., Potter C. S., Carragher B., Automated molecular microscopy: The new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lemaire K., Ravier M. A., Schraenen A., Creemers J. W. M., Van de Plas R., Granvik M., Van Lommel L., Waelkens E., Chimienti F., Rutter G. A., Gilon P., in’t Veld P. A., Schuit F. C., Insulin crystallization depends on zinc transporter ZnT8 expression, but is not required for normal glucose homeostasis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 14872–14877 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Quinault A., Leloup C., Denwood G., Spiegelhalter C., Rodriguez M., Lefebvre P., Messaddeq N., Zhang Q., Dacquet C., Penicaud L., Collins S. C., Modulation of large dense core vesicle insulin content mediates rhythmic hormone release from pancreatic beta cells over the 24h cycle. PLOS ONE 13, e0193882 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Noske A. B., Costin A. J., Morgan G. P., Marsh B. J., Expedited approaches to whole cell electron tomography and organelle mark-up in situ in high-pressure frozen pancreatic islets. J. Struct. Biol. 161, 298–313 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dobro M. J., Melanson L. A., Jensen G. J., McDowall A. W., Plunge freezing for electron cryomicroscopy. Methods Enzymol. 481, 63–82 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lučić V., Förster F., Baumeister W., Structural studies by electron tomography: From cells to molecules. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 833–865 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li S., Fernandez J.-J., Marshall W. F., Agard D. A., Electron cryo-tomography provides insight into procentriole architecture and assembly mechanism. eLife 8, e43434 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tao C.-L., Liu Y.-T., Sun R., Zhang B., Qi L., Shivakoti S., Tian C.-L., Zhang P., Lau P.-M., Zhou Z. H., Bi G.-Q., Differentiation and characterization of excitatory and inhibitory synapses by cryo-electron tomography and correlative microscopy. J. Neurosci. 38, 1493–1510 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carter S. D., Hampton C. M., Langlois R., Melero R., Farino Z. J., Calderon M. J., Li W., Wallace C. T., Tran N. H., Grassucci R. A., Siegmund S. E., Pemberton J., Morgenstern T. J., Eisenman L., Aguilar J. I., Greenberg N. L., Levy E. S., Yi E., Mitchell W. G., Rice W. J., Wigge C., Pilli J., George E. W., Aslanoglou D., Courel M., Freyberg R. J., Javitch J. A., Wills Z. P., Area-Gomez E., Shiva S., Bartolini F., Volchuk A., Murray S. A., Aridor M., Fish K. N., Walter P., Balla T., Fass D., Wolf S. G., Watkins S. C., Carazo J. M., Jensen G. J., Frank J., Freyberg Z., Ribosome-associated vesicles: A dynamic subcompartment of the endoplasmic reticulum in secretory cells. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay9572 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Skelin M., Rupnik M., Cencic A., Pancreatic beta cell lines and their applications in diabetes mellitus research. ALTEX 27, 105–113 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Merglen A., Theander S., Rubi B., Chaffard G., Wollheim C. B., Maechler P., Glucose sensitivity and metabolism-secretion coupling studied during two-year continuous culture in INS-1E insulinoma cells. Endocrinology 145, 667–678 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mahamid J., Pfeffer S., Schaffer M., Villa E., Danev R., Cuellar L. K., Forster F., Hyman A. A., Plitzko J. M., Baumeister W., Visualizing the molecular sociology at the HeLa cell nuclear periphery. Science 351, 969–972 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schaffer M., Mahamid J., Engel B. D., Laugks T., Baumeister W., Plitzko J. M., Optimized cryo-focused ion beam sample preparation aimed at in situ structural studies of membrane proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 73–82 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nixon-Abell J., Obara C. J., Weigel A. V., Li D., Legant W. R., Xu C. S., Pasolli H. A., Harvey K., Hess H. F., Betzig E., Blackstone C., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Increased spatiotemporal resolution reveals highly dynamic dense tubular matrices in the peripheral ER. Science 354, aaf3928 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marsh B. J., Pavelka M., Viewing Golgi structure and function from a different perspective–insights from electron tomography. Methods Cell Biol. 118, 259–279 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Engel B. D., Schaffer M., Albert S., Asano S., Plitzko J. M., Baumeister W., In situ structural analysis of Golgi intracisternal protein arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 11264–11269 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ladinsky M. S., Mastronarde D. N., McIntosh J. R., Howell K. E., Staehelin L. A., Golgi structure in three dimensions: Functional insights from the normal rat kidney cell. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1135–1149 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gan W. J., Zavortink M., Ludick C., Templin R., Webb R., Webb R., Ma W., Poronnik P., Parton R. G., Gaisano H. Y., Shewan A. M., Thorn P., Cell polarity defines three distinct domains in pancreatic β-cells. J. Cell Sci. 130, 143–151 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wijesekara N., Dai F. F., Hardy A. B., Giglou P. R., Bhattacharjee A., Koshkin V., Chimienti F., Gaisano H. Y., Rutter G. A., Wheeler M. B., Beta cell-specific Znt8 deletion in mice causes marked defects in insulin processing, crystallisation and secretion. Diabetologia 53, 1656–1668 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wolf S. G., Mutsafi Y., Dadosh T., Ilani T., Lansky Z., Horowitz B., Rubin S., Elbaum M., Fass D., 3D visualization of mitochondrial solid-phase calcium stores in whole cells. eLife 6, e29929 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.White K., Singla J., Loconte V., Chen J. H., Ekman A., Sun L., Zhang X., Francis J. P., Li A., Lin W., Tseng K., McDermott G., Alber F., Sali A., Larabell C., Stevens R. C., Visualizing subcellular rearrangements in intact β-cells using soft X-ray tomography. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc8262 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rorsman P., Renström E., Insulin granule dynamics in pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 46, 1029–1045 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ivanova A., Kalaidzidis Y., Dirkx R., Sarov M., Gerlach M., Schroth-Diez B., Müller A., Liu Y., Andree C., Mulligan B., Münster C., Kurth T., Bickle M., Speier S., Anastassiadis K., Solimena M., Age-dependent labeling and imaging of insulin secretory granules. Diabetes 62, 3687–3696 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McDonald A., Fogarty S., Leclerc I., Hill E. V., Hardie D. G., Rutter G. A., Control of insulin granule dynamics by AMPK dependent KLC1 phosphorylation. Islets 1, 198–209 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng Y., Yu W., Li X., Lin S., Zhou Y., Hu J., Liu X., Structural insight into Golgi membrane stacking by GRASP65 and GRASP55 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 28418–28427 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pendin D., Greotti E., Filadi R., Pozzan T., Spying on organelle Ca2+ in living cells: The mitochondrial point of view. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 38, 39–45 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dunn M. F., Zinc–ligand interactions modulate assembly and stability of the insulin hexamer—A review. Biometals 18, 295–303 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lawson R., Maret W., Hogstrand C., ZnT8 haploinsufficiency impacts MIN6 cell zinc content and beta-cell phenotype via ZIP-ZnT8 coregulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5485 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Singla J., McClary K. M., White K. L., Alber F., Sali A., Stevens R. C., Opportunities and challenges in building a spatiotemporal multi-scale model of the human pancreatic β cell. Cell 173, 11–19 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Horwitz R., Integrated, multi–scale, spatial-temporal cell biology—A next step in the post genomic era. Methods 96, 3–5 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schaffer M., Pfeffer S., Mahamid J., Kleindiek S., Laugks T., Albert S., Engel B. D., Rummel A., Smith A. J., Baumeister W., Plitzko J. M., A cryo-FIB lift-out technique enables molecular-resolution cryo-ET within native Caenorhabditis elegans tissue. Nat. Methods 16, 757–762 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Asfari M., Janjic D., Meda P., Li G., Halban P. A., Wollheim C. B., Establishment of 2-mercaptoethanol-dependent differentiated insulin-secreting cell lines. Endocrinology 130, 167–178 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tivol W. F., Briegel A., Jensen G. J., An improved cryogen for plunge freezing. Microsc. Microanal. 14, 375–379 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schaffer M., Engel B. D., Laugks T., Mahamid J., Plitzko J. M., Baumeister W., Cryo-focused ion beam sample preparation for imaging vitreous cells by cryo-electron tomography. Bio. Protoc. 5, e1575 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mastronarde D. N., Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kremer J. R., Mastronarde D. N., McIntosh J. R., Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Agulleiro J. I., Fernandez J. J., Fast tomographic reconstruction on multicore computers. Bioinformatics 27, 582–583 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Martinez-Sanchez A., Garcia I., Asano S., Lucic V., Fernandez J.-J., Robust membrane detection based on tensor voting for electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 186, 49–61 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen M., Dai W., Sun S. Y., Jonasch D., He C. Y., Schmid M. F., Chiu W., Ludtke S. J., Convolutional neural networks for automated annotation of cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 14, 983–985 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/50/eabc8258/DC1