Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Nov 23;5(48):30980–30988. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03905

Fe3O4-Loaded g-C3N4/C-Layered Composite as a Ternary Photocatalyst for Tetracycline Degradation

Jiandong Gu †, Hailang Jia †, Shuaishuai Ma †,*, Zhaolian Ye †,‡, Junli Pan †, Ruoyu Dong †, Yuqing Zong §, Jinjuan Xue §,*
PMCID: PMC7726751  PMID: 33324806

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c03905_0012.jpg

A ternary photocatalyst, Fe3O4-loaded g-C3N4/C-layered composite (g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4) was fabricated by a facile sonication and in situ precipitation technique. Carbon nanosheets were prepared using the remaining non-metallic components of waste printed circuit boards as carbon sources. In this hybrid structure, g-C3N4 was immobilized on the surfaces of carbon nanosheets to form a layered composite, and 10–15 nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles are uniformly deposited on the surface of the composite material. The photocatalytic performance of the catalyst was studied by degrading tetracycline (TC) under simulated sunlight. The results showed that the photoactivity of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 composite to TC was significantly enhanced, and the degradation rate was 10.07 times higher than that of pure g-C3N4, which was attributed to Fe3O4 nanoparticles and carbon nanosheets. Carbon sheets with good conductivity are an excellent electron transporter, which promotes the separation of photogenerated carriers and the Fe3O4 nanoparticles can utilize electrons effectively as a center of oxidation–reduction. Moreover, a possible photocatalytic mechanism for the excellent photocatalytic performance was proposed.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the existence of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater and its harm to the living ecosystem have attracted wide attention all over the world.1 Tetracycline (TC), as a broad-spectrum antibiotic, has been widely used to prevent human and animal infections because of its antibacterial, bactericidal effect and low price.2,3 However, 70–90% of the administered dose of TC is excreted via urine and feces, which has been detected in several water sources.4 In order to effectively remove and degrade TC, various technologies have been developed, such as physical absorption, electrolysis, photocatalysis, microbial decomposition, electrochemical oxidation, and membrane separation.5−8 Moreover, semiconductor photocatalysis technology, as a green and efficient technology, has become the research hotspot of TC residue treatment in recent years. Graphitized carbon nitride (g-C3N4), as a typical metal-free polymer semiconductor material, has a unique two-dimensional structure, a suitable band gap to absorb visible light radiation and excellent chemical stability.9,10 Although g-C3N4 has already shown great potential in the photocatalysis field for water splitting,11 degradation, and CO2 reduction,12 inevitable shortcomings such as low utilization efficiency of visible light, fast photo-induced carrier recombination, low BET surface area, and difficulty in restoring suspension/dispersion limit its photocatalytic activity.13 Therefore, several strategies have been developed to enhance the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4, such as porous structure design, metal or nonmetal element doping, surface modification, coupling with semiconductors, and so forth.14−16

Of special notice, carbon materials are an excellent conductor of electrons and can transfer photoexcited electrons quickly to avoid carrier recombination.17 For instance, carbon dots, graphene, nanotubes, and others have been proven as effective components in g-C3N4-based hybrid systems due to their superior electrical, mechanical, thermal, and optical properties. Up to now, numerous significant research studies have been conducted via directly coupling carbon materials with g-C3N4-based materials, which include GO/g-C3N4/CDs,18 MWNTs/g-C3N4,19 g-C3N4/graphene/NiFe2O4,20 and carbon@g-C3N4 core–shell nanostructures,21 etc. Noticeably, since g-C3N4 is also a π-conjugated semiconducting material, the electronic integration of g-C3N4 with several carbonaceous materials including CNTs, carbon black, graphene, and carbon nanodots can significantly improve the delocalization, thus promoting the rapid migration of photoinduced electrons, hindering the recombination of carriers and improving the quantum efficiency of photocatalytic reactions.22 However, the present g-C3N4-based photocatalysts are difficult to recover and separate after photocatalytic reactions, which cannot meet the requirements of practical application. An effective strategy to solve this defect is to deposit magnetic materials on g-C3N4 sheets. As a typical magnetic material, Fe3O4 has been widely used in the synthesis of magnetic photocatalysts due to its good stability, low cost, good magnetism, and environmental friendliness. In addition, it can also be used as a good redox medium to store electrons and further improve photocatalytic performance.23−27

Herein, as illustrated in Figure S1, we report a ternary heterojunction consisting of g-C3N4 sheets and Fe3O4 nanoparticles, with carbon layers attaching on the surfaces of the two components as an electron transfer mediator. The carbon material was prepared using the remaining nonmetallic fractions of waste printed circuit board (WPCB) as a carbon source according to our previous study.28 The magnetically separable g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was synthesized via a simple sonication technique followed by an in situ precipitation method. Under simulated sunlight, the photocatalytic degradation activity of the prepared g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 ternary composite for antibiotic TC was significantly improved compared to pure g-C3N4 and the g-C3N4/C composite. Moreover, the stability of the ternary g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst and the mechanism of improving photocatalytic efficiency under solar light were studied.

2. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of all as-prepared samples are shown in Figure 1. The carbon sample shows two peaks at around 26.1 and 41.8°, which can be indexed to the (002) and (100) diffraction planes of the amorphous carbon, respectively. The peaks located at 12.9 and 27.2° correspond to the (100) and (002) planes of g-C3N4, which are attributed to the in-plane structural packing motif and interlayer stacking of the aromatic system, respectively. No carbon diffraction peak is observed in the g-C3N4/C complex, which should be attributed to the low carbon content and weak diffraction intensity in the g-C3N4/C complex. As for g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4, the characteristic peaks of Fe3O4 are found in the XRD pattern apart from that of g-C3N4, in which the peaks at 35.5, 57.1, and 62.6° can be indexed to the (311), (511), and (440) crystal planes of Fe3O4 (JCPDS 75-0449), respectively.29 The XRD results indicate that the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst was successfully prepared.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of Fe3O4, carbon, g-C3N4, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4.

The morphology and microstructure of bare g-C3N4, pure carbon, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 were investigated by TEM, and the results are shown in Figure 2. The sample of g-C3N4 (Figure 2a) displays an irregular sheet structure, and the carbon (Figure 2b) shows a typical two-dimensional nanosheet morphology with thin thickness. Figure 2c,d shows TEM images of the g-C3N4/C nanocomposite. It can be seen that the carbon nanosheets and the g-C3N4 nanosheets are successfully combined to form a 2D–2D interface. g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 exhibits a similar layer structure to g-C3N4/C. In addition, many nanoparticles with a diameter of about 10 to 15 nm are evenly distributed on the surface of carbon and g-C3N4. In addition, the peaks of Fe, C, N, and O are clearly observed in the EDS result (Figure 2f) of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4. The SAED pattern in Figure 2g consists of three diffraction rings, indicating the presence of Fe3O4. The three ring patterns observed in SAED are indexed to (311), (511), and (440) planes of Fe3O4, which are in good agreement with the XRD spectra.30 In the HRTEM images of Figure 2h,i, the lattice fringe of 0.25 nm corresponds to the (311) plane of Fe3O4. All of the above observations suggested that the ternary hybrid photocatalyst g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 was indeed formed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

TEM images of (a) g-C3N4, (b) carbon, (c, d) g-C3N4/C, and (e) g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4. (f) EDS of C3N4/C/Fe3O4, (g) SAED patterns, (h) HRTEM image of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4, and (i) HRTEM image of Fe3O4.

The elemental compositions and the surface chemical states of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 were obtained by XPS spectroscopy. As depicted in Figure 3a, the XPS survey spectra of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 illustrated that the prepared sample was composed of C, N, O, and Fe elements. Figure 3b shows the C 1s core spectra of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample. The peak at 284.6 eV is assigned to graphitic or hydrogenated C–C bonding. Also, the other two peaks located at 281.1 and 282.7 eV originate from the adventitious carbon.31 The adventitious carbon on the sample surface may originate from the atmosphere, sample handling, and the contamination in the XPS chamber. In Figure 3c, a main peak with the strongest intensity located at 395.3 eV is attributed to the C=N—C groups in the triazine rings, and the weaker peak located at 397.1 eV is assigned to the amino groups located at the edges of the polymeric g-C3N4 sheets.32 The binding energies of the Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2 were observed at 724.9 and 710.2 eV,33 which are associated with the spin–orbit peaks of Fe3O4 (Figure 3d). The presence of Fe3O4 can be further confirmed by the O 1s XPS peak at 530.1 eV (Figure 3e), which corresponds to the oxygen species in the Fe3O4 phase; the small O 1s peak at 531.8 eV in Figure 4e indicates the presence of oxygen-containing groups.34

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) XPS survey spectra and high-resolution XPS spectra of (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, (d) Fe 2p, and (e) O 1s core-level electrons of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of as-prepared g-C3N4, carbon, g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4.

The specific surface area and porous nature of the as-prepared photocatalysts were analyzed by the N2 adsorption–desorption technique. As depicted in Figure 4, the g-C3N4 sample exhibits a type IV with a H3 hysteresis loop, indicating the presence of a mesoporous structure within the sample.35 The N2 adsorption isotherm of carbon shows a sharp increase in adsorption at a low relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.01–0.1, revealing their microporous characteristics,36 and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was 2419.1 m2·g–1. The g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 nanocomposites exhibit a transitional isotherm from type I to type IV (Figure 3 inset), which indicates the coexistence of micropores and mesopores. Notably, an H3-type hysteresis loop was observed in the range of P/P0 = 0.5–1.0, indicating the presence of mesopores. The amount of nitrogen adsorbed can be found in the low-pressure zone, further proving that there are abundant micropores, which are derived from the voids of carbon nanosheets. Also, the pore size distributions (Figure S2) of the as-prepared carbon, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 samples showed a narrow pore size distribution and were mainly microporous (<2 nm). This is consistent with the analysis of the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm. As shown in Table S1, the surface areas calculated using the BET method of g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 were 146.6 and 125.1 m2·g–1, respectively, much higher than that of pure g-C3N4 (17.4 m2·g–1). It is clear that the surface area of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 decreased after loading of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. This may be due to the covering and blocking of some parts of the g-C3N4/C surface by Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The increased specific surface area was conducive to the adsorption and transfer of pollutant molecules and provided a large number of reaction sites for enhanced photocatalytic activity.

The optical properties of g-C3N4, carbon, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 were investigated by UV–vis DRS, and the results are shown in Figure 5a. For pristine g-C3N4, the response cutoff wavelength is 460 nm, and the high selectivity to the visible spectral range corresponds to its band gap; thus, the photoconversion efficiency in the visible range is rather low. It is known that the narrow gap of sp2carbon clusters embedded in the carbon layer has excellent optical absorption capacity in almost the whole wavelength, so the introduction of carbon materials can improve the optical absorption efficiency of the g-C3N4/C sample.37 As expected, compared with pristine g-C3N4, the g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 samples show wider light absorption capacity and improved adsorption strength in the whole UV–visible region.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) UV–vis absorption spectra and (b) PL emission spectra of the as-prepared samples.

The photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL) was used to study the separation and recombination of photoelectrons and holes in semiconductor catalysts.38 As shown in Figure 5b, compared with g-C3N4, the PL peak intensity of g-C3N4/C is significantly reduced, which is related to the inhibition of light-induced carrier recombination. The PL intensity of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 is much weaker than those of g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/C, indicating that the carbon layer can effectively transfer photoelectrons and extend the life of photoelectron–hole pairs. The results demonstrated that the introduction of a carbon layer and Fe3O4 can effectively inhibit the recombination rate of photocarriers, thus producing more active groups and improving the photocatalytic performance.

In order to determine the separation efficiency of the carrier, photochemical measurements were performed.39Figure 6a displays the transient photocurrent responses of g-C3N4, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 samples in several light on–off cycles. Compared with g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/C, g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 significantly improves the photocurrent performance. The results show that it has the lowest electron and hole recombination rate, indicating that Fe3O4 and carbon nanosheets play an important role in the ternary photocatalyst. In Figure 6b, the charge migration rate was evaluated according to the arc radius in the EIS. Obviously, g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 shows the minimum radius of curvature, indicating its highest electron–hole pair separation and electron transfer efficiency, which agreed well with the results of PL and photocurrent response.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Photocurrent response curves and (b) Nyquist plots of g-C3N4, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4.

The performance of degradation of TC by all synthesized samples under simulated sunlight is displayed in Figure 7a. As depicted in Figure S3, in the dark adsorption step, adsorption–desorption equilibrium was reached within 60 min and 30.2 and 28.6% of CIP can be adsorbed by g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4, respectively. It is noted that the g-C3N4/C and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalysts exhibited a higher adsorption ability than pure g-C3N4, which can be ascribed to the increased specific surface area and the interactions between the graphitic carbon layer (sp2 bonding) and the aromatic rings of the TC molecules. In the control experiment, TC basically did not degrade without the photocatalyst, indicating that the self-decomposition of TC can be ignored. Under the same conditions, the carbon and pure g-C3N4 samples only degraded 3.6 and 28.8% of the TC in 120 min. Compared to pure g-C3N4, the coupling of carbon and g-C3N4 obviously improved the photodegradation efficiency. As expected, g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 had the best degradation efficiency, with the photodegradation rate of TC, approaching 96.4% under the same irradiation time. According to the first-order kinetics model, the apparent rate constants (kapp/min–1) of g-C3N4, carbon, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 are calculated to be 0.0029, 0.0003, 0.0063, and 0.0292 min–1, respectively (Figure 7b). It is worth noting that the rate constant of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample is the highest, which is 10.07 times that of the original g-C3N4. The enhanced activity of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 can be attributed to the formation of heterojunctions that can effectively separate photocarriers, and the introduction of carbon in the composite material also helps to expand the optical response range and realize more effective electron transfer.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Photocatalytic (a) activities and (b) kinetics for TC degradation over the as-prepared bare g-C3N4, carbon, g-C3N4/C, and g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 samples under simulated solar light illumination.

Photocatalytic stability and recyclability are the main parameters of its practical application. Figure 8a shows the photocatalytic TC degradation performance of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample under simulated sunlight for five successive runs. It can be seen that after five cycles, the removal rate of TC remains at 88.1%, indicating that the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst possesses high stability and can be used for repeated treatment of TC. Additionally, XRD patterns presented in Figure S4 shows that the position of the diffraction peaks for g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 before and after the fifth use remained unchanged, with a slight decrease in the peak intensities. In this study, EDTA, p-benzoquinone, and t-BuOH were used to scavenge h+, ·O2–, and ·OH, respectively, in order to investigate in depth the photocatalytic mechanism. In Figure 8b, it can be seen that the degradation rate of TC is significantly reduced after adding p-benzoquinone (1 mM) and EDTA (1 mM), indicating that •O2–and h+ play significant roles in the degradation process. However, little efficiency reduction with the addition of t-BuOH (1 mM) demonstrated that ·OH might not the predominant active species. Based on the analysis of tapping experiments, it can be concluded that •O2– and h+ primarily contributed to the photocatalytic removal of TC over the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Cycling photocatalytic degradation tests and (b) TC degradation rates in the presence of different radical scavengers over the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 catalyst.

In order to clarify the photodegradation pathway of TC under the action of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst, the main intermediate products converted by TC in the photodegradation process were accurately identified by HPLC-MS, and the result is shown in Figure S5 and Table S2. Obviously, TC is completely transformed into seven main photoproducts, which are designated as P2–P7 in the order of retention time. Combining with these detection results and references,40−42 degradation and removal processes can be divided into three main pathways (Figure 9). Briefly, the m/z of 445.1 (P1) is the molecular ion of TC and also appeared in the mass spectrum at the early stage of degradation. The first pathway is that the TC was transformed into P2 with m/z 427.1, which is due to dehydration. Meanwhile, deprotonated product P3 with m/z 397 was generated via loss of the N-dimethyl group due to the relative low bond energy of C–N and loss of the hydroxyl group. When further increasing the reaction time, the formation of P4 with m/z 318.3 was proposed to form via dihydroxylation. Subsequently, the loss of methyl group occurred from intermediate P4 and then intermediate P5 was produced. The third possible degradation route is that the tetracycline molecule was attacked by ·OH to form its hydroxylated product P6 with m/z 453.3. The product P7 with m/z 362.3 was formed through the further oxidation of product P6 and ring opening. These ring-opening products were finally oxidized into CO2 and H2O.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Removal pathway of TC over g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4.

Figure 10 shows the schematic representation of the proposed mechanism for target pollutant degradation over the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 ternary photocatalyst. First, the introduction of carbon nanosheets resulted in a larger specific surface area of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample, thus providing more active reaction sites. According to previous studies, the CB and VB edge potentials of g-C3N4 were at −1.12 and 1.57 eV, respectively.43 The g-C3N4 yields photoinduced electrons and holes after exciting by simulated solar light. Because the carbon nanosheets in the ternary complex have good electron transport capability, the electrons generated in the VB of g-C3N4 are quickly transferred to the Fe3O4 nanoparticles resulting in the decrease of the electron–hole recombination rate and the prolongation of positive hole half-life, along these lines, high photocatalytic activity was expected in the test of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4. In addition, g-C3N4 and carbon nanosheets are layered systems with a tri-triazine structure and have electron delocalization, leading to high charge separation.44 On the other hand, these captured electrons by Fe3O4 nanoparticles could react with oxygen to form active species ·O2–, and ·OH radicals also can be produced via multistep reduction of O2.45 Moreover, the Fe3+ existing in Fe3O4 captures the electrons to generate Fe2+ and combines with O2 to generate more ·O2–. Meanwhile, the photogenerated holes left in the VB of g-C3N4 reacted with the target pollutants directly instead of oxidized H2O to produce active species ·OH to participate in the reaction, which can explain why the EVB value of g-C3N4 (+1.57 eV) is lower than the redox potential of ·OH/H2O (+2.68 eV).46 These active substances produced in the photocatalytic process would further react with organic pollutants to achieve degradation.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Proposed photocatalytic mechanism of the as-prepared g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 ternary nanocomposite.

3. Conclusions

In summary, the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 ternary nanocomposite was synthesized by a facile sonication and in situ precipitation technology. The as-prepared g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 has significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of antibiotic TC, and the degradation rate is nearly ten times higher than that of g-C3N4 under simulated solar light. The significantly improved photocatalytic activity should be attributed to the enhancement of optical absorption, enlarged specific surface area, and effective separation efficiency of photogenerated carriers. According to the determination of free radical capture experiments, the main active substances responsible for photocatalytic degradation are photoinduced holes and ·O2– free radicals. Finally, the ternary photocatalyst showed reasonable stability during five successive runs.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Preparation of Samples

Preparation of g-C3N4: 5 g of melamine was heated at 550 °C (2 °C·min–1) for 4 h. Then, the obtained yellow product was collected and ground into powder.

Synthesis of carbon nanosheets: the remaining WPCB nonmetallic fraction was carbonized in a microwave oven for 20 min at 600 W. The cooled product was mixed and ground with KOH at a mass ratio of 1:2 and then activated at 850 °C for 90 min under nitrogen protection at a heating rate of 1 °C·min–1. Finally, the samples were washed with DI water until the pH value was neutral and dried at 120 °C for 12 h.

Synthesis of g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst: first, g-C3N4 (2.5 g) and carbon powder (0.25 g) were dispersed in 200 mL of ethanol/water (v/v, 1/3) and ultrasonicated for 2 h at ambient temperature. After that, FeCl3·6H2O (0.1081 g) and FeCl2·4H2O (0.0398 g) were dissolved separately in 5 mL of deionized water and added to the above suspension. The resulting mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 120 min, and then 8 mL of ammonia solution was quickly injected into the above reaction mixture and then stirred for 60 min. The products were collected, washed several times with deionized water and alcohol, and dried overnight at 65 °C vacuum.

4.2. Characterization of Photocatalysts

X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were obtained on an X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab, Rigaku) with Cu Kα radiation in the range of 10–70° (2θ). The morphology and microstructure of the samples were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Japan) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). The elements of the sample prepared were analyzed by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the samples were measured using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu). Photoluminescence (PL) with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm was obtained using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Shimadzu RF-5301). The specific Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas were determined by nitrogen adsorption using Micromeritics ASAP 2020 nitrogen adsorption apparatus. The analysis of intermediates was performed using an HPLC-MS system (Agilent 1290/6460, Triple Quad MS) equipped with a Zorbax XDB-C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm). The electrochemical measurement was performed with an electrochemical workstation (CHI660B, Chen Hua Instruments, Shanghai, China).

4.3. Photocatalytic Experiments

The photodegradation of tetracycline (TC) was performed in a photochemical reactor at room temperature. Also, a 500 W xenon lamp was used as the simulated solar light source. Typically, 10 mg of the as-prepared photocatalyst was suspended in 40 mL of TC solution (10 mg·L–1) and stirred magnetically for 60 min in the dark to ensure the establishment of the adsorption/desorption equilibrium between the catalyst and the simulated pollutant. In the course of the experiment, 1 mL of the sample was taken out every 5 min and a PTFE syringe filter (0.45 μm) was used to remove the particles. The concentration of TC was monitored by a high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC, Shimadzu LC-20A) equipped with an Inertsil ODS-SP column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and ultrapure water (with the addition of 0.2% formic acid) with a volume ratio of 25:75 at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min–1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21808019 and 31800495), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant nos. BK20181048, BK20180958, BK20181476, and BK20181040), the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (18KJB150014), the Science and Technology Bureau of Changzhou (CJ20190074), and the open fund by Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (KHK1904).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c03905.

  • Schematic illustration of the preparation processes of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 photocatalyst (Figure S1), Barrett–Joyner–Halenda pore size distribution curves of the as-prepared materials (Figure S2), pore structure parameters of the as-prepared materials (Table S1), TC adsorption capacities of the as-prepared samples (Figure S3), XRD pattern of the g-C3N4/C/Fe3O4 sample before and after five cycle run photocatalytic experiments (Figure S4), mass spectra of the TC and intermediates eluted at different retention times (Figure S5), and identification of TC and its possible transformation products during photodegradation (Table S2) (PDF)

Author Contributions

∥ J.D.G. and H.L.J. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao0c03905_si_001.pdf (642.3KB, pdf)

References

  1. Xu J.; Zhang B.; Jia L.; Bi N.; Zhao T. Metal-enhanced fluorescence detection and degradation of tetracycline by silver nanoparticle-encapsulated halloysite nano-lumen. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 386, 121630. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu X.; Guo X.; Liu Y.; Lu S.; Xi B.; Zhang J.; Wang Z.; Bi B. A review on removing antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater by constructed wetlands: Performance and microbial response. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 112996. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.112996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang Y.; Song W.; Lin H.; Wang W.; Du L.; Xing W. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in global lakes: A review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2018, 116, 60–73. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen M.; Jaffé R. Photo- and bio-reactivity patterns of dissolved organic matter from biomass and soil leachates and surface waters in a subtropical wetland. Water Res. 2014, 61, 181–190. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu Q.; Li Z.; Hong H. Adsorption of the quinolone antibiotic nalidixic acid onto montmorillonite and kaolinite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 74, 66–73. 10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiang D.; Xiao P.; Shao L.; Li D.; Chen M. RGO-promoted all-solid-state g-C3N4/BiVO4 Z-scheme heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic activity toward the degradation of antibiotics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 8823–8832. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu W. H.; Zhang G.; Wai O. W. H.; Zou S. C.; Li X. D. Transport and adsorption of antibiotics by marine sediments in a dynamic environment. J. Soils Sediments 2009, 9, 364–373. 10.1007/s11368-009-0091-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yan X.; Wang X.; Gu W.; Wu M.; Yan Y.; Hu B.; Che G.; Han D.; Yang J.; Fan W.; Shi W. Single-crystalline AgIn (MoO4)2 nanosheets grafted Ag/AgBr composites with enhanced plasmonic photocatalytic activity for degradation of tetracycline under visible light. Appl. Catal., B 2015, 164, 297–304. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kang S.; He M.; Chen M.; Wang Z.; Sun Z.; Dang H.; Chang X.; Dong M.; Liu P.; Cui L. Polymeric structure optimization of g-C3N4 by using confined argon-assisted highly-ionized ammonia plasma for improved photocatalytic activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 556, 214–223. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wen J.; Xie J.; Chen X.; Li X. A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 72–123. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lan Z.-A.; Zhang G.; Wang X. A facile synthesis of Br-modified g-C3N4 semiconductors for photoredox water splitting. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 192, 116–125. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li X.; Xiong J.; Gao X.; Huang J.; Feng Z.; Chen Z.; Zhu Y. Recent advances in 3D g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting, degradation of pollutants and CO2 reduction. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 802, 196–209. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu J.; Yu J.; Jiang C.; Cheng B. g-C3N4-Based heterostructured photocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701503. 10.1002/aenm.201701503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang S.; He M.; Chen M.; Liu Y.; Wang Y.; Wang Y.; Dong M.; Chang X.; Cui L. Surface amino group regulation and structural engineering of graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced photocatalytic activity by ultrafast ammonia plasma immersion modification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 14952–14959. 10.1021/acsami.9b01068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shi L.; Liang L.; Ma J.; Wang F.; Sun J. Remarkably enhanced photocatalytic activity of ordered mesoporous carbon/g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts under visible light. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 7236–7244. 10.1039/C4DT00087K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He F.; Chen G.; Yu Y.; Hao S.; Zhou Y.; Zheng Y. Facile approach to synthesize g-PAN/g-C3N4 composites with enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7171–7179. 10.1021/am500198y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu Y.; Xu H.; Yan J.; Li H.; Huang L.; Zhang Q.; Huang C.; Wan H. A novel visible-light-response plasmonic photocatalyst CNT/Ag/AgBr and its photocatalytic properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5821–5830. 10.1039/c3cp44104k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Prakash K.; Vinoth Kumar J.; Latha P.; Senthil Kumar P.; Karuthapandian S. Fruitful fabrication of CDs on GO/g-C3N4 sheets layers: A carbon amalgamation for the remediation of carcinogenic pollutants. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2019, 370, 94–104. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.10.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ge L.; Han C. Synthesis of MWNTs/g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts with efficient visible light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Appl. Catal., B 2012, 117-118, 268–274. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.01.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gebreslassie G.; Bharali P.; Chandra U.; Sergawie A.; Boruah P. K.; Das M. R.; Alemayehu E. Novel g-C3N4/graphene/NiFe2O4 nanocomposites as magnetically separable visible light driven photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2019, 382, 111960. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma L.; Fan H.; Fu K.; Lei S.; Hu Q.; Huang H.; He G. Protonation of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) for an electrostatically self-assembling carbon@ g-C3N4 core–shell nanostructure toward high hydrogen evolution. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 7093–7103. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Patnaik S.; Martha S.; Acharya S.; Parida K. M. An overview of the modification of g-C3N4 with high carbon containing materials for photocatalytic applications. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 336–347. 10.1039/C5QI00255A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang L.; Lu Z. Y.; Yang L. L.; Zhao X. X.; Zhu Z.; Gao N. L.; Wang Y. S.; Yan Y. S. Preparation and Structure of a novel PS/Fe3O4 nanochain. Adv. Mater. Res. 2015, 1082, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu Z.; Lu Z.; Wang D.; Tang X.; Yan Y.; Shi W.; Wang Y.; Gao N.; Yao X.; Dong H. Construction of high-dispersed Ag/Fe3O4/g-C3N4 photocatalyst by selective photo-deposition and improved photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 182, 115–122. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan W.; Zhu Z.; Yu Y.; Liu Z.; Li C.; Huo P.; Qiu Y.; Yan Y. Fabrication of magnetic g-C3N4 for effectively enhanced tetracycline degradation with RGO as mediator. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 15974–15984. 10.1039/C8NJ02994F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu J.; Hua W.; Yue Y.; Gao Z. Efficient Aerobic Oxidation of Ethyl Lactate to Ethyl Pyruvate over V2O5/g-C3N4 Catalysts. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16200–16207. 10.1021/acsomega.0c01822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu R.; Yang W.; He G.; Zheng W.; Li M.; Tao W.; Tian M. Ag-Modified g-C3N4 Prepared by a One-Step Calcination Method for Enhanced Catalytic Efficiency and Stability. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 19615–19624. 10.1021/acsomega.0c02161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Qin H.; Pan J.; Zhou Y.; Zhu B.; Huang J.; Huang H.; Wang L.; Hou Y.; Zhou Q. Non-metallic printed circuit board waste derived carbon for the supercapacitor electrode material. Micro Nano Lett. 2020, 15, 166–169. 10.1049/mnl.2018.5743. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu J.; Zhou Y.; Lei J.; Ao Z.; Zhou Y. Fe3O4/graphene aerogels: A stable and efficient persulfate activator for the rapid degradation of malachite green. Chemosphere 2020, 251, 126402. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang Y.; Jiang K.; Guo J.; Li J.; Peng X.; Hong B.; Wang X.; Ge H. Facile fabrication of Au/Fe3O4 nanocomposites as excellent nanocatalyst for ultrafast recyclable reduction of 4-nitropheol. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122596. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen X.; Tadd A. R.; Schwank J. W. Carbon deposited on Ni/Ce–Zr–O isooctane autothermal reforming catalysts. J. Catal. 2007, 251, 374–387. 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.07.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nam J. S.; Kim A. R.; Kim D. M.; Chang T. S.; Kim B. S.; Bae J. W. Novel heterogeneous Rh-incorporated graphitic-carbon nitride for liquid-phase carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid. Catal. Commun. 2017, 99, 141–145. 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raza A.; Shen H.; Haidry A. A.; Cui S. Hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4/TiO2/g-C3N4: Advanced photocatalytic application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 488, 887–895. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang X.; Lu M.; Zhang X.; Wen G.; Zhou Y.; Fei L. Carbon microtube/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with improved wave-absorbing performance. Scr. Mater. 2012, 67, 613–616. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang J.; Hu Y.; Jiang X.; Chen S.; Meng S.; Fu X. Design of a direct Z-scheme photocatalyst: Preparation and characterization of Bi2O3/g-C3N4 with high visible light activity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 280, 713–722. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chang B.; Yin H.; Zhang X.; Zhang S.; Yang B. Chemical blowing strategy synthesis of nitrogen-rich porous graphitized carbon nanosheets: Morphology, pore structure and supercapacitor application. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 191–203. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pan D.; Zhang J.; Li Z.; Wu C.; Yan X.; Wu M. Observation of pH-, solvent-, spin-, and excitation-dependent blue photoluminescence from carbon nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3681–3683. 10.1039/c000114g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yu S.; Li J.; Zhang Y.; Li M.; Dong F.; Zhang T.; Huang H. Local spatial charge separation and proton activation induced by surface hydroxylation promoting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of polymeric carbon nitride. Nano Energy 2018, 50, 383–392. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lin Y.; Zhou S.; Liu X.; Sheehan S.; Wang D. TiO2/TiSi2 heterostructures for high-efficiency photoelectrochemical H2O splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2772–2773. 10.1021/ja808426h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun Y.; Qi X.; Li R.; Xie Y.; Ren B. Hydrothermal synthesis of 2D/2D BiOCl/g-C3N4 Z-scheme: For TC degradation and antimicrobial activity evaluation. Opt. Mater. 2020, 108, 110170. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xie Z.; Feng Y.; Wang F.; Chen D.; Zhang Q.; Zeng Y.; Lv W.; Liu G. Construction of carbon dots modified MoO3/g-C3N4 Z-scheme photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of tetracycline. Appl. Catal., B 2018, 229, 96–104. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen S.; Tang L.; Feng H.; Zhou Y.; Zeng G.; Lu Y.; Yu J.; Ren X.; Peng B.; Liu X. Carbon felt cathodes for electro-Fenton process to remove tetracycline via synergistic adsorption and degradation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 921–931. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang X.; Maeda K.; Thomas A.; Takanabe K.; Xin G.; Carlsson J. M.; Domen K.; Antonietti M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80. 10.1038/nmat2317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mousavi M.; Habibi-Yangjeh A. Decoration of Fe3O4 and CoWO4 nanoparticles over graphitic carbon nitride: novel visible-light-responsive photocatalysts with exceptional photocatalytic performances. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 105, 159–171. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.04.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gao N.; Lu Z.; Zhao X.; Zhu Z.; Wang Y.; Wang D.; Hua Z.; Li C.; Huo P.; Song M. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of a double conductive C/Fe3O4/Bi2O3 composite photocatalyst based on biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 351–361. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ren H.-T.; Jia S.-Y.; Wu Y.; Wu S.-H.; Zhang T.-H.; Han X. Improved Photochemical Reactivities of Ag2O/g-C3N4 in Phenol Degradation under UV and Visible Light. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 17645–17653. 10.1021/ie503312x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao0c03905_si_001.pdf (642.3KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES