Skip to main content
International Journal of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
. 2020 May 27;7(4):161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.04.002

Italian nurses knowledge and attitudes towards fatigue in pediatric onco-hematology: A cross-sectional nationwide survey

Elena Rostagno a, Anna Bergadano b, Michela Piredda c,, Maria Grazia De Marinis d
PMCID: PMC7729244  PMID: 33319013

Abstract

Background and Objective

Fatigue is one of the most debilitating and prevalent symptoms in pediatric cancer patients and it is important to know if nurses are able to recognize and manage it. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes towards fatigue of nurses working in Italian pediatric onco-hematology centers.

Methods

Cross-sectional online survey. An existing questionnaire was adapted to the Italian context, extended with a section on attitudes, and psychometrically tested. The questionnaire was sent to all nurses working in Italian pediatric onco-hematology centers.

Results

Respondents (n = 189), who were working in 37/53 (∼70%) centers, reported 42% of children and 68% of adolescents experiencing fatigue, with intensity increasing with age. Contributing factors were treatments and co-morbidities; frequent symptoms were mood changes and lack of energy. Among respondents who did not assess fatigue, 36.2% did not know an appropriate tool. Nurses recognized fatigue as an important problem and their knowledge and attitudes towards fatigue seemed satisfactory.

Conclusion

This study provides nurses with an instrument to investigate their knowledge and attitudes about fatigue. Nurses’ awareness of the significance of fatigue is a fundamental step towards improving its management and offering strategies that can help both the child and their family.

Keywords: Fatigue, Cancer, Children, Adolescents

1. Introduction

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most debilitating and prevalent symptoms in pediatric cancer patients. Depending on patients’ age, cancer diagnosis, and illness stage, the prevalence of fatigue varies from 35.6% [1] to 93% [2], especially among hospitalized children [3]. Fatigue is related to cancer, chemotherapy, and other conditions such as depression, sleep deprivation, or pain [4]. It is a multidimensional phenomenon that develops over time, is often already present at the time of diagnosis, and persists throughout the therapeutic path [5]. CRF reduces energy levels and negatively affects patients’ psychological states, ways of thinking and feeling, abilities to concentrate, and interpersonal relationships. Pediatric patients with a high fatigue level report a lower quality of life [6] and of sleep [7]. Many patients therefore experience great suffering due to fatigue.

Cancer-related fatigue is defined differently by children and adolescents. While the adolescents highlight a changing sense of physical and mental exhaustion, the children underline being physically weak or tired [8].

With the exception of the last decades, CRF in the pediatric field has received little attention from health professionals. This may be due to aggressive treatments aimed at obtaining child healing and survival absorbing the main consideration of clinicians. In this perspective, side effects such as fatigue are seen as inevitable and not as a priority [9,10]. As a consequence, the effects caused by fatigue on the children could be under-assessed and under-estimated.

Lack of symptom detection can make an illness even more stressful [11]. Instead, in particular, effective assessment and treatment of the fatigue symptom can improve both the quality of the care provided and the quality of patient’s life which are one of the primary goals one of the primary goals of care [12,13]. For health professionals to be able to assess and manage fatigue effectively, they need specific knowledge and positive attitudes. Knowledge and attitudes are key components of professional competences and should be assessed in conjunction [14].

To our knowledge, only three surveys were conducted to assess health professionals’ knowledge of CRF in children with cancer. These surveys used an adapted version of a questionnaire previously developed by Magnusson et al. [15] and modified by Knowles et al. [16] The questionnaire mainly investigated the knowledge of professionals regarding risk factors, mechanisms, and prevalence of fatigue, and the interventions implemented to reduce the symptom. Health professionals’ attitudes, identified as ability to pay attention to the issue, were not investigated. The most recent survey [17] including nurses and physicians working in four pediatric clinics in Turkey, found that those health professionals who regard CRF as a problem know the causes of fatigue and use different interventions to improve the symptom. The other two surveys conducted in the UK reported that health professionals perceived fatigue to be a significant problem, but its mechanisms, risk factors, prevalence, and duration were poorly understood [9,18]. Moreover, they reported a different perception between children and adolescents of the experience of fatigue.

In summary, current literature is limited to a few studies on health professionals’ knowledge about fatigue, while data on attitudes is lacking. Among health professionals caring for pediatric patients with cancer, nurses are in a key position to manage symptoms such as fatigue and, when symptoms are controlled, patient’s quality of life improves and costs are reduced [19]. The knowledge and attitudes of oncology clinical nurse specialists have a positive impact on cancer patients’ outcomes such as fatigue, pain, and health-related quality of life [20]. However, no instrument was found able to investigate both nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward CRF in pediatric patients and, in particular, no study was conducted in Italy on the subject. Therefore, the aims of this study are: 1) to modify the questionnaire used in previous studies by inserting a section on attitudes and testing its psychometric properties; 2) to investigate knowledge of and attitudes regarding fatigue among nurses working in Italian centers of pediatric onco-hematology.

2. Methods

2.1. Research design and instrument

The study was a cross-sectional online survey. The questionnaire was based on those used by Gibson et al. [9,18] and Yilmaz et al. [17] and adapted following the guidelines by Brancato et al. [21] A panel of four clinical nurses expert in pediatric oncology, two of whom had advanced competence in English, met to translate and adapt the above questionnaire to the Italian context. Moreover, after two meetings, the panel developed four indicators of nurses’ attitudes on pediatric CRF. The resulting instrument consisted of three sections: 1) knowledge about fatigue in pediatric oncology; 2) assessment and management of fatigue; and 3) nurses’ attitudes towards fatigue. The knowledge section included four questions (two closed and two open-ended); the assessment and management section included three closed questions; the attitudes section included four statements with which respondents had to express their agreement using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = complete agreement to 5 = complete disagreement). Socio-demographic data was also collected. The questionnaire was developed as an on-line form, allowing data to be automatically recorded on an Excel spreadsheet.

Content validity of the instrument was assessed in a pilot study involving twenty nurses working in a pediatric oncology centre. It included the relevance and wording of the questions, the functionality of the online form, and the acceptability of the questionnaire. No changes were needed as a result of this pilot test.

2.2. Setting and population

All nurses working in any of the 53 pediatric onco-hematology centers existing in Italy were invited to participate. At the time the study was conducted, there were 956 nurses working in pediatric oncology in Italy.

2.3. Data collection

Data was collected from October 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017. The 53 nursing referees of the centers were sent an e-mail invitation to participate containing the link to the survey with the request to forward it to all nurses in their centers. An invitation e-mail was also sent directly to all nurses registered for the newsletter of the nursing working group of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. Three e-mail reminders were sent to those who had not answered a couple of weeks apart.

2.4. Data analysis

Descriptive analysis was conducted as percentages and frequencies of respondent demographics and questionnaire scores. The differences between scores of knowledge, attitudes, fatigue assessment, and management as dependent variables were compared with univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with nurses’ demographics as independent variables. Internal consistency of the items investigating nurses’ attitudes was assessed by computing the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.

2.5. Ethics

The study was conducted in accordance with current Italian legislation concerning the protection of human subjects and the processing of personal data (Law n.675, December 31, 1996). The completion and submission of the questionnaire were considered as an expression of consent to participate in the study and authorization to process data for the purposes and in the manner indicated in the e-mail invitation.

3. Results

One hundred and eighty-nine nurses out of 956 answered the questionnaire (19.8% response rate) from 37/53 (∼70%) different Italian pediatric oncology and hematology centers. A hundred and seventy (79.9%) were female, with mean age of 42 years (range 24–62, SD 9.3) and mean work experience in pediatric oncology of 12.2 years (range 0.25–35, SD 9.2). In particular, 84.2% of nurses had worked in this setting for at least 3 years and 46.6% for at least 10 years. Sixty-seven (35.4%) respondents reported possessing a degree in Pediatric Nursing and one hundred and twenty-two (64.6%) a degree in Nursing, while 54 (28.5%) had obtained one or more post-registration qualifications. Sample demographics are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sample demographics.

Respondents (N = 189)
N % Mean (range)
Gender
M 19 10.1
F 170 89.9
Age
24-30 38 20.1 40.2 (24–62)
31-40 58 30.7
41-50 67 35.4
>50 26 13.8
Work experience in pediatric oncology
≤2 30 15.9 12.2 (3m-35 y)
3-10 71 37.6
>10 88 46.6
Qualification
Nurse 122 64.6
Pediatric Nurse 67 35.4
Post-registration qualification (n = 73)
Master in oncology and palliative care 10 13.7
Other Master 50 68.5
Master in Science of Nursing 12 16.6
PhD 1 1.4

Note: m= months; y= years

During undergraduate and post-registration education, 46.6% (n = 88) had received some training on fatigue in the pediatric patient, including university lectures (35.2%) or participation in conferences (31.8%) lasting 1–4 h (72.7%). Almost all nurses (98.9%) believed it would be useful to receive more training on the subject.

3.1. Knowledge about pediatric fatigue

The first set of questions assess the perceived intensity of the symptom of fatigue on an 11-point Likert scale (from 0 = “not at all intense” to 10 = “extremely intense”) in four groups of age: 2–4, 5–7, 8–12, and 13–18 years. Fatigue intensity increases with age in nurses’ reports. In particular, mean intensity is 5.9 for children aged 2–4 years, 7 for children aged 5–7 years, 8 for the age group 8–12 years, and 9 for adolescents (13–18 years).

Knowledge about fatigue prevalence was assessed specifically for children and adolescents. Nurse respondents reported 42% children and 68% adolescents experiencing fatigue. Respondents were asked to list five contributing factors to fatigue. They provided 828 answers, which were grouped into ten categories (Table 2). Treatments (including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and corticosteroids) and their side effects were the most frequent contributing factors (26.6%), followed by co-morbidities such as anemia, infections, and pain (17.8%), frequent or prolonged hospitalizations (14.8%), and psychological problems including depression, anxiety, anger, stress, sadness, anguish, and loneliness (12.3%). Less reported categories were life disruption (isolation from friends and school), physical problems (decrease of physical activities, lack of energy, difficulty in accepting the new physical appearance), nutritional problems, cancer, sleep disturbances, and parental/family support. Nurses were asked to also list five signs and symptoms of fatigue. The most frequently reported signs/symptoms were mood changes (26.6%), lack of energy (26%), sleepiness (14%), change in appetite (9.1%), lack of interest in socialization (9%), decreased ability to concentrate (5.3%), and lack of interest in play (3.1%).

Table 2.

Contributing factors.

Answers (N = 828)
N %
Treatment and side effects 220 26.6
Comorbidities 148 17.8
Hospitalization 123 14.8
Psychological problems 102 12.3
Nutritional problems 38 4.6
Cancer 34 4.1
Sleep problems 19 2.3
Parental/family support 18 2.2
Others 36 4.5

3.2. Fatigue assessment and management

Eighty-one (42.8%) respondents declared that they evaluated fatigue. The methods used to assess fatigue were direct patient observation (n = 64, 79%), an unspecified structured questionnaire (n = 7, 8.6%), the Fatigue Scale (Adolescent) (n = 1, 1.2%), the Fatigue Diary (n = 1, 1.2%), and directly asking the patient (n = 1, 1.2%). Seven respondents reported evaluating fatigue but did not specify in what way.

Among the 108 nurses who reported not evaluating fatigue, the reasons for the lack of evaluation were investigated. Thirty-four (36.2%) reported that they did not know a measuring instrument, 29 (30.9%) reported not having adequate training, and 11 (11.7%) that the centre where they work does not provide for it. The remaining 34 nurses did not specify the reason for the lack of evaluation. One hundred and sixty-six nurses (87.8%) believe useful interventions to reduce fatigue do exist (Table 3), and 108 (65%) report having proposed them to their patients and obtaining apparently positive results, but without conducting studies to evaluate their effectiveness.

Table 3.

Interventions.

Answers (N = 250)
N %
Psychological support 71 28.4
Stimulating and encouraging play and recreational activities 46 18.4
Encouraging physical activity 36 14.4
Pharmacological therapy 27 10.8
Nutritional support 19 7.6
Guaranteeing sleep/rest 13 5.2
Complementary therapies 12 4.8
Communication/information 8 3.2
Transfusion support 5 2.0
Other 13 5.2

The study was conducted in accordance with current Italian legislation concerning the protection of persons and other subjects regarding the processing of personal data (Law n.675, December 31, 1996).

3.3. Attitudes

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this section was 0.695 and did not improve with removal of any item. Respondents had to express the extent of agreement with the following statements: 1) Fatigue evaluation is a nursing competence; 2) Fatigue affects the quality of life of the patient and the family; 3) Fatigue cannot be evaluated because it is too subjective; and 4) Fatigue does not affect treatment compliance. The two latter items had negative wording and their responses were reverse coded. The lowest scores (range 1–5) meant more positive attitudes towards fatigue assessment and management. Nurses’ agreement with the above statements was shown respectively by the following scores: 1.97 (SD 1.08), 1.67 (SD 1.21), 2.28 (SD 1.05), and 1.81 (SD 1.03).

3.4. Nurse demographic characteristics associated with knowledge and attitudes

The differences between scores of knowledge, attitudes, fatigue assessment, and management as dependent variables were compared with univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with nurses’ demographics as independent variables. Gender, age, undergraduate training, and work experience in pediatric onco-hematology do not significantly affect the perception nurses have of the intensity and prevalence of the symptom for patients, or of their attitudes, assessment, and management of fatigue.

4. Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge of and attitudes towards fatigue reported by nurses working in Italian centers of pediatric onco-hematology. To this end, a pre-existing questionnaire was modified with the addition of a special section on attitudes. The internal consistency of this section was very close to the value of 0.7, which is considered adequate [22]. Although nurses’ response rate was low (19.8%), which was the main limitation of this study, 70% of pediatric onco-hematologic centers were represented in the survey.

The attitudes towards fatigue assessment and management of nurse respondents were positive, suggesting their readiness to pay attention to the issue. However, it was not possible to compare these results with previous studies, because this was the first survey investigating this aspect. In agreement with health professionals in the surveys conducted by Gibson et al. [9,18] and by Yilmaz el al. [17], Italian nurses also believe that fatigue is a major problem, and, in particular, more for adolescents than for children. These results are confirmed by various studies that have assessed the importance of fatigue in pediatric patients with cancer [11,23,24].

For Italian nurses, the symptom fatigue seems less prevalent in children (42%) than in adolescents (68%). Enskär and von Essen [2,25] in their studies showed that the problem of fatigue was reported with higher prevalence by children and adolescents receiving treatment (65% of the children, 93% of the adolescents) than by those who had completed treatment (43% of the children, 67% of the adolescents). However, it is very difficult to estimate precisely the intensity and prevalence of fatigue as they vary over time and treatment [26,27], and there are numerous differences in measurement [28].

In this study, in agreement with previous literature [9,17,18], the main factors related to fatigue were treatments and side effects, co-morbidities, and psychological problems. Unlike the professionals who participated in the surveys by Yilmaz et al. [17] and Gibson et al. [18], Italian nurses identified hospitalization, life disruption, and parental/family support as some of the factors related to fatigue. The need for frequent and sometimes prolonged admissions and changes in living habits are two interlinked factors. In the study by Hinds et al. [8], the environment of the hospital was identified as a factor related with fatigue by patients, parents, and health personnel. The emotional state of the parents was not identified as a related factor in any of the previous surveys. However, parents’ distress has been found to mediate between children’ symptoms and distress [[29], [30], [31]]. Moreover, no differences with the previous surveys were identified regarding the signs and symptoms [9,17,18].

Most nurses who did not assess fatigue reported that they did not know an appropriate measurement tool, and those who assessed it did so mainly by using observation as a measurement method. The most commonly used tools [32,33] to assess the fatigue in pediatric oncology are the Peds Quality of Life Multidimensional Fatigue Scale [34] and the Fatigue Scale [35,36]. There are no Italian versions of these psychometrically tested tools and this is probably the reason why Italian nurses do not know and do not use them.

Most of the nurse respondents believed there were interventions that were useful to reduce fatigue and many proposed them to their patients. Research has not yet produced significant evidence about effective interventions to reduce fatigue in this context [37]. Therefore, nurses must be cautious when using available non-pharmacological interventions.

5. Conclusion

Fatigue is the most prevalent and debilitating symptom in pediatric cancer patients and the survey revealed that nurses recognized it as a problem. Nurse participants showed satisfactory knowledge about fatigue intensity, prevalence, and related factors. Nurses’ attitudes toward fatigue were also good, showing their readiness to pay attention to this symptom. The lack of validated Italian instruments to assess cancer-related pediatric fatigue and of effective interventions hinders its assessment and treatment. This study provides pediatric oncology nurses with an instrument to investigate their knowledge and attitudes about fatigue. However, more research should further test its psychometric properties.

The study involved nurses coming from most Italian pediatric oncology centers and its results can be considered representative of the current situation in Italy. This may be particularly true for aspects that, although disclosed by a number of respondents, are likely to be part of the routine behavior of the whole nursing team, such as assessment and treatment of fatigue. In contrast, knowledge and attitudes could be more influenced by individual variability. Further research with bigger samples should confirm the results from this study.

Regardless of the results obtained, the greatest strength of this research has been that of making Italian nurses aware of the importance of the assessment of fatigue and of the active role they can play in its management and treatment. Nurses’ awareness of the significance of this symptom is a fundamental step towards improving its management and offering strategies that can help both the child and the family.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.000000.

Contributor Information

Elena Rostagno, Email: elena.rostagno@aosp.bo.it.

Anna Bergadano, Email: anna.bergadano@unito.it.

Michela Piredda, Email: m.piredda@unicampus.it.

Maria Grazia De Marinis, Email: m.demarinis@unicampus.it.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

figs1.jpg (901.2KB, jpg)

References

  • 1.Collins J.J., Byrnes M.E., Dunkel I.J., Lapin J., Nadel T., Thaler H.T. The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2000;19(5):363–377. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Enskär K., von Essen L. Prevalence of aspects of distress, coping, support and care among adolescents and young adults undergoing and being off cancer treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(5):400–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller E., Jacob E., Hockenberry M.J. Nausea, pain, fatigue, and multiple symptoms in hospitalized children with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38(5):E382–E393. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.E382-E393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barsevick A.M., Irwin M.R., Hinds P., Miller A., Berger A., Jacobsen P. Recommendations for high-priority research on cancer-related fatigue in children and adults. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(19):1432–1440. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Williams P.D., Williams A.R., Kelly K.P., Dobos C., Gieseking A., Connor R. A symptom checklist for children with cancer: the therapy-related symptom checklist-children. Canc Nurs. 2012;35(2):89–98. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821a51f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Gamal E., Long T. Health-related quality of life and its association with self-esteem and fatigue among children diagnosed with cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(21–22):3391–3399. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hockenberry M., Hooke M.C. Symptom clusters in children with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2007;23(2):152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hinds P.S., Hockenberry-Eaton M., Gilger E., Kline N., Burleson C., Bottomley S. Comparing patient, parent, and staff descriptions of fatigue in pediatric oncology patients. Canc Nurs. 1999;22(4):277–288. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199908000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gibson F., Garnett M., Richardson A., Edwards J., Sepion B. Heavy to carry: a survey of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of cancer-related fatigue in children and young people. Canc Nurs. 2005;28(1):27–35. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200501000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Whitsett S.F., Gudmundsdottir M., Davies B., McCarthy P., Friedman D. Chemotherapy-related fatigue in childhood cancer: correlates, consequences, and coping strategies. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008;25(2):86–96. doi: 10.1177/1043454208315546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hockenberry M. Symptom management research in children with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2004;21(3):132–136. doi: 10.1177/1043454204264387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eddy L., Cruz M. The Relationship between fatigue and quality of life in children with chronic health problems: a systematic review. J Spec Pediatr Nurs (JSPN) 2007;12(2):105–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2007.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ekti Genc R., Conk Z. Impact of effective nursing interventions to the fatigue syndrome in children who receive chemotherapy. Canc Nurs. 2008;31(4):312–317. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000305740.18711.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Spencer L., Spencer P. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; San Francisco: 1993. Competence at work. Models for superior performance. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Magnusson K., Karlsson E., Palmblad C., Leitner C., Paulson A. Swedish nurses’ estimation of fatigue as a symptom in cancer patients--report of a questionnaire. Eur J Canc Care. 1997;6(3):186–191. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1997.00024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knowles G., Borthwick D., McNamara S., Miller M., Leggot L. Survey of nurses’ assessment of cancer-related fatigue. Eur J Canc Care. 2000;9(2):105–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2000.00197.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yilmaz H.B., Taş F., Muslu G.K., Başbakkal Z., Kantar M. Health professionals’ estimation of cancer-related fatigue in children. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2010;27(6):330–337. doi: 10.1177/1043454210377176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gibson F., Edwards J., Sepion B., Richardson A. Cancer-related fatigue in children and young people: survey of healthcare professionals’ knowledge and attitudes. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006;10(4):311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mason H., DeRubeis M.B., Foster J.C., Taylor J.M.G., Worden F.P. Outcomes evaluation of a weekly nurse practitioner-managed symptom management clinic for patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40(6):581–586. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.40-06AP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim M.Y. Effects of oncology clinical nurse specialists’ interventions on nursing-sensitive outcomes in South Korea. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(5):E66–E74. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.E66-E74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brancato G., Macchia S., Murgia M., Signore M., Simeoni G., Blanke K. Handbook of recommended practices for questionnaire development and testing in the European statistical system. http://www.istat.it/en/files/2013/12/Handbook_questionnaire_development_2006.pdf Retrieved from.
  • 22.Beck C.T., Polit D.F. eighth ed. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pöder U., Ljungman G., von Essen L. Parents’ perceptions of their children’s cancer-related symptoms during treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;40(5):661–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Cleve L., Muñoz C.E., Savedra M., Riggs M., Bossert E., Grant M. Symptoms in children with advanced cancer. Canc Nurs. 2012;35(2):115–125. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821aedba. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Enskär K., von Essen L. Physical problems and psychosocial function in children with cancer. Paediatr Nurs. 2008;20(3):37–41. doi: 10.7748/paed2008.04.20.3.37.c6521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yeh C.H., Chiang Y.C., Lin L., Yang C.P., Chien L.C., Weaver M.A. Clinical factors associated with fatigue over time in paediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. Br J Canc. 2008;99(1):23–29. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Perdikaris P., Merkouris A., Patiraki E., Tsoumakas K., Vasilatou-Kosmidis E., Matziou V. Evaluating cancer related fatigue during treatment according to children’s, adolescents’ and parents’ perspectives in a sample of Greek young patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(5):399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Berger A.M., Abernethy A.P., Atkinson A., Barsevick A.M., Breitbart W.S., Cella D. Cancer-related fatigue. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(8):904–931. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dahlquist L.M., Pendley J.S. When distraction fails: parental anxiety and children’s responses to distraction during cancer procedures. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005;30(7):623–628. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liossi C., White P., Franck L., Hatira P. Parental pain expectancy as a mediator between child expected and experienced procedure-related pain intensity during painful medical procedures. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(5):392–399. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31804ac00c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stoddard F.J., Saxe G., Ronfeldt H., Drake J.E., Burns J., Edgren C. Acute stress symptoms in young children with burns. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(1):87–93. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000184934.71917.3a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Crichton A., Knight S., Oakley E., Babl F.E., Anderson V. Fatigue in child chronic health conditions: a systematic review of assessment instruments. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e1015–e1031. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2014-2440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomlinson D., Hinds P.S., Ethier M.-C., Ness K.K., Zupanec S., Sung L. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer: a Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2013;45(1):83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Varni J.W., Burwinkle T.M., Katz E.R., Meeske K., Dickinson P. The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory generic core scales, multidimensional fatigue scale, and cancer module. Cancer. 2002;94(7):2090–2106. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hinds P.S., Hockenberry M., Tong X., Rai S.N., Gattuso J.S., McCarthy K. Validity and reliability of a new instrument to measure cancer-related fatigue in adolescents. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34(6):607–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hockenberry M.J., Hinds P.S., Barrera P., Bryant R., Adams-McNeill J., Hooke C. Three instruments to assess fatigue in children with cancer: the child, parent and staff perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;25(4):319–328. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00680-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bhardwaj T., Koffman J. Non-pharmacological interventions for management of fatigue among children with cancer: systematic review of existing practices and their effectiveness. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7(4):404–414. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

figs1.jpg (901.2KB, jpg)

Articles from International Journal of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine are provided here courtesy of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

RESOURCES