Here, we present the draft genome sequence of a novel species of the genus Singulisphaera (phylum Planctomycetes, family Isosphaeraceae) isolated from soil. Singulisphaera sp. strain GP187 has a relatively large mobilome and numerous novel genes that may contribute to the production of bioactive molecules.
ABSTRACT
Here, we present the draft genome sequence of a novel species of the genus Singulisphaera (phylum Planctomycetes, family Isosphaeraceae) isolated from soil. Singulisphaera sp. strain GP187 has a relatively large mobilome and numerous novel genes that may contribute to the production of bioactive molecules.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Culture-independent analysis reveals that Planctomycetes is the fifth most abundant bacterial phylum in global soil samples (1), yet this phylum remains underrepresented in axenic cultures, and a large majority of these cultures are derived from aqueous environments (2). Aqueous planctomycetes are hypothesized to have evolved from terrestrial species (3).
Singulisphaera sp. strain GP187 was isolated on 3 June 2014 from the Harvard Forest, a temperate forest ecosystem in Petersham, MA (42.54°N, −72.18°W). Organic horizon soil was pretreated with 6% yeast extract plus 0.05% SDS (4), plated onto oatmeal medium, and incubated aerobically at 20°C, with colonies appearing after 8 days. GP187 was the only Planctomycetes strain of the hundreds of isolates from this site (5) and thus was subjected to whole-genome sequencing.
GP187 was grown aerobically on Reasoner’s 2A (R2A) medium (pH 7) (6). Genomic DNA was purified using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) procedure (7) but was not sheared or size selected. The draft genome sequence was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A PacBio SMRTbell library was constructed and sequenced on the PacBio RS platform, generating 407,937 reads (N50, 3.6 kbp). The filtered raw reads (675.3 Mbp) were assembled using HGAP v2.3 _p5 (protocol version, 2.3.0; method, RS HGAP Assembly.3, smrtpipe.py v1.87.139483) (8). The final draft assembly contained 5 contigs in 5 scaffolds (N50, 6.278 Mbp), estimated as 99.61% complete and 5.81% contaminated using CheckM v1.0.18 (9) in KBase (10). The input read sequencing depth was 72.8×. Gene annotations were completed within the JGI’s Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform (11) and KBase. Default parameters were used for all software.
The genome is 10,689,158 bp (G+C content, 63.07%) and is predicted to encode 8,388 proteins (36.6% without predicted function), 8 rRNA operons, and 110 RNA genes (24 rRNAs, 64 tRNAs). GP187 has the largest genome of cultured Isosphaeraceae strains and the second largest genome of cultured Planctomycetes strains (12).
Phylogenetically, the closest species to GP187 is the aquatic Singulisphaera acidiphila DSM 18658 (13). These strains share 98.84% homology for 16S rRNA genes (average as determined by searching public RNA isolates with IMG BLAST) and 86.7% whole-genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) (IMG pairwise ANI). Isosphaeraceae genome sequences characteristically carry large plasmids; GP187 harbors a putative plasmid of 63.8 kb (G+C content, 61.8%; a lower G+C content is typical of plasmids [14]). The subtilisin gene open reading frame spans, without gaps, the ends of contig5 and shares 82% homology with the plasmid-encoded subtilisin gene of S. acidiphila DSM 18658, suggesting that contig5 is a circular plasmid.
GP187 contains 60% more mobilome-associated genes (186 [2.2% of protein-encoding genes] versus 117 [1.5%], respectively) and 78% more genomic islands (41 versus 23, respectively) than S. acidiphila DSM 18658, as predicted by IslandViewer4 (15). GP187 has a greater potential to synthesize specialized metabolites, given that novel genes of this species are categorized as giant genes (≤5,000 bp with Kbase RAST annotation) (16) or are located in biosynthesis gene clusters (17) more often than in S. acidiphila DSM 18658 (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Differences in select characteristics between S. acidiphila DSM 18658 and S. acidiphila sp. GP187
| Strain | Genome size (Mbp) | No. (%) of: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein coding genesa | Genes without predicted functiona | Giant genes without predicted functionb | Genes without predicted function in BGCsc | ||
| S. acidiphila DSM 18658 | 9.76 | 7,576 (98.6) | 2,578 (33.6) | 7 (20.6) | 76 (29.8) |
| S. acidiphila sp. GP187 | 10.69 | 8,388 (98.7) | 3,110 (36.6) | 14 (35.0) | 104 (36.4) |
Percentage of total protein coding genes (IMG).
Percentage of giant genes (KBase).
Percentage of total genes in biosynthetic gene clusters (BCGs) (IMG).
This genome sequence will contribute to our understanding of terrestrial species of Planctomycetes, a phylum abundant in soil but underrepresented in isolate genome analysis. Analysis of this genome sequence may elucidate its ecological role in terrestrial ecosystems, identify evolutionary relationships between terrestrial and aquatic Singulisphaera species, and contribute to the discovery of novel secondary metabolites.
Data availability.
This whole-genome sequence was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number NZ_FSRB00000000.1. The raw data were deposited in the JGI GOLD under the project number Gp0151081 and in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRX2158412. The JGI annotation is found at https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/m/main.cgi?section=TaxonDetail&page=taxonDetail&taxon_oid=2695420965#.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under contract DEB-1749206 (K.M.D. and M.A.M.) and the DOE Genomic Sciences Program under contract DE-SC0016590 (K.M.D.). DNA sequencing and library preparation were supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Community Science Program, project CSP506489, under K.M.D. JGI, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.
We thank Mallory Choudoir for helpful comments on the manuscript and Daniel Freedman for help with the statistical analysis.
REFERENCES
- 1.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, Maestre FT, Singh BK, Fierer N. 2018. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359:320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wiegand S, Jogler M, Boedeker C, Pinto D, Vollmers J, Rivas-Marín E, Kohn T, Peeters SH, Heuer A, Rast P, Oberbeckmann S, Bunk B, Jeske O, Meyerdierks A, Storesund JE, Kallscheuer N, Lücker S, Lage OM, Pohl T, Merkel BJ, Hornburger P, Müller R-W, Brümmer F, Labrenz M, Spormann AM, Op den Camp HJM, Overmann J, Amann R, Jetten MSM, Mascher T, Medema MH, Devos DP, Kaster A-K, Øvreås L, Rohde M, Galperin MY, Jogler C. 2020. Cultivation and functional characterization of 79 planctomycetes uncovers their unique biology. Nat Microbiol 5:126–140. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0588-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Andrei A-Ş, Salcher MM, Mehrshad M, Rychtecký P, Znachor P, Ghai R. 2019. Niche-directed evolution modulates genome architecture in freshwater Planctomycetes. ISME J 13:1056–1071. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0332-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hayakawa M, Nonomura H. 1989. A new method for the intensive isolation of actinomycetes from soil. Actinomycetologica 3:95–104. doi: 10.3209/saj.3_95. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pold G, Billings AF, Blanchard JL, Burkhardt DB, Frey SD, Melillo JM, Schnabel J, van Diepen LTA, DeAngelis KM. 2016. Long-term warming alters carbohydrate degradation potential in temperate forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6518–6530. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02012-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van der Linde K, Lim BT, Rondeel JMM, Antonissen LPMT, de Jong GMT. 1999. Improved bacteriological surveillance of haemodialysis fluids: a comparison between Tryptic soy agar and Reasoner’s 2A media. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:2433–2437. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.10.2433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Joint Genome Institute. 2012. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA: https://jgi.doe.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/JGI-Bacterial-DNA-isolation-CTAB-Protocol-2012.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, Sneddon MW, Henderson ML, Riehl WJ, Murphy-Olson D, Chan SY, Kamimura RT, Kumari S, Drake MM, Brettin TS, Glass EM, Chivian D, Gunter D, Weston DJ, Allen BH, Baumohl J, Best AA, Bowen B, Brenner SE, Bun CC, Chandonia J-M, Chia J-M, Colasanti R, Conrad N, Davis JJ, Davison BH, DeJongh M, Devoid S, Dietrich E, Dubchak I, Edirisinghe JN, Fang G, Faria JP, Frybarger PM, Gerlach W, Gerstein M, Greiner A, Gurtowski J, Haun HL, He F, Jain R, Joachimiak MP, Keegan KP, Kondo S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Varghese N, White JR, Seshadri R, Smirnova T, Kirton E, Jungbluth SP, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2019. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D666–D677. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ravin NV, Rakitin AL, Ivanova AA, Beletsky AV, Kulichevskaya IS, Mardanov AV, Dedysh SN. 2018. Genome analysis of Fimbriiglobus ruber SP5(T), a planctomycete with confirmed chitinolytic capability. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02645-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02645-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guo M, Han X, Jin T, Zhou L, Yang J, Li Z, Chen J, Geng B, Zou Y, Wan D, Li D, Dai W, Wang H, Chen Y, Ni P, Fang C, Yang R. 2012. Genome sequences of three species in the family Planctomycetaceae. J Bacteriol 194:3740–3741. doi: 10.1128/JB.00639-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nishida H. 2012. Comparative analyses of base compositions, DNA sizes, and dinucleotide frequency profiles in archaeal and bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. Int J Evol Biol 2012:342482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group , Lau BY, Hoad G, Winsor GL, Brinkman FSL. 2017. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W30–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reva O, Tümmler B. 2008. Think big—giant genes in bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10:768–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hadjithomas M, Chen I-MA, Chu K, Ratner A, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Huang J, Reddy TBK, Cimermančič P, Fischbach MA, Ivanova NN, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC, Pati A. 2015. IMG-ABC: a knowledge base to fuel discovery of biosynthetic gene clusters and novel secondary metabolites. mBio 6:e00932-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00932-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome sequence was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number NZ_FSRB00000000.1. The raw data were deposited in the JGI GOLD under the project number Gp0151081 and in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRX2158412. The JGI annotation is found at https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/m/main.cgi?section=TaxonDetail&page=taxonDetail&taxon_oid=2695420965#.
