Abstract
Recent studies on insulin, leptin, osteocalcin (OCN), and bone remodeling have evoked interest in the interdependence of bone formation and energy household. Accordingly, this study attempts to investigate trauma specific hormone changes in a murine trauma model and its influence on fracture healing. Thereunto 120 female wild type (WT) and leptin-deficient mice underwent either long bone fracture (Fx), traumatic brain injury (TBI), combined trauma (Combined), or neither of it and therefore served as controls (C). Blood samples were taken weekly after trauma and analyzed for insulin and OCN concentrations. Here, WT-mice with Fx and, moreover, with combined trauma showed a greater change in posttraumatic insulin and OCN levels than mice with TBI alone. In the case of leptin-deficiency, insulin changes were still increased after bony lesion, but the posttraumatic OCN was no longer trauma specific. Four weeks after trauma, hormone levels recovered to normal/basal line level in both mouse strains. Thus, WT- and leptin-deficient mice show a trauma specific hyperinsulinaemic stress reaction leading to a reduction in OCN synthesis and release. In WT-mice, this causes a disinhibition and acceleration of fracture healing after combined trauma. In leptin-deficiency, posttraumatic OCN changes are no longer specific and fracture healing is impaired regardless of the preceding trauma.
Keywords: fracture healing, TBI, Insulin, osteocalcin, leptin, posttraumatic hormone household, bone hormone interaction
1. Introduction
The pathomechanism of the intriguing phenomenon of accelerated callus formation in polytrauma patients with concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI), first described in 1964, remains unknown [1,2,3]. So far, cytokines, growth factors, regulatory proteins, mesenchymal stem cells, hormones, proteins, and even electrolytes have been investigated without a sufficient conclusion on the link between the central neuronal trauma and its bony effects [4]. Recently, the regulatory function of bone on energy homeostasis and the effects of metabolically active hormones on bone remodeling have been increasingly recognized.
Especially the discovery of the bone specific hormone osteocalcin (OCN) in 1975, together with more recent findings on the osteometabolic function of Insulin and Leptin, resulted in an increasing interest in the (neuro-) endocrine control of bone formation and the metabolic importance of the skeletal system as an endocrine organ [5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Many experiments in this field already highlighted a close interplay of especially these three hormones, which together seem to play the central role in both–bone remodeling and energy homeostasis. Insulin, for example, showed to have an enormous influence on the skeletal system, as insulin-receptor-knock-out (KO)-mice suffered from impaired trabecular bone formation due to reduced osteoblast numbers, decreased bone formation rate and reduced osteoclast activation [12]. In addition, it was shown that intraosteoblast insulin signaling directly caused enhanced osteoclast activation, bone resorption and a concomitant increase in the release of this under- or un-γ-carboxylated OCN, Glu-OCN, from the extracellular matrix (ECM) [13,14]. As the hormone’s bioactive, soluble form, Glu-OCN executes its function in pancreatic β-cells, as well as in liver, bone and muscle cells. Here, it leads to the up-regulation of insulin production, release, and sensitivity and thus, closes a so-called insulin-OCN-fast-forward-loop, ultimately multiplying insulin’s metabolic as well as bone remodeling effects [11,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Similar experiments with leptin-KO-mice also showed this hormone’s positive peripheral effect on bone formation. However, unlike insulin, leptin also seems to have a negative central influence on bone remodeling via a hypothalamic relay and the activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) [7,21,22]. In experiments with intracerebroventricular leptin injections, SNS-signaling leads to a β2A-receptor-stimulation in osteoblasts, which increases the expression of the embryonic-stem-cell-phosphatase (ESP) gene and causes a promotion of osteoclast differentiation and osteoblast testicular tyrosinphosphatase (OST-PTP) activity, which restrains the above described insulin-OCN-feed-forward-loop by a dephosphorylation of the osteoblast insulin receptor (for further details, see Figure 1 and Figure 2) [11,13,16,23,24,25].
In summary, various studies have shown a complex regulatory interplay of leptin, insulin, and OCN, which together balance bone formation with energy supply, storage, and expenditure aiming for an energy homeostasis in continuously shifting short and long term glucose levels. In this context, the skeletal system serves as a potent sensor, store, and effector in the interplay of energy offer and consumption [23].
In TBI and bone healing after polytrauma energy, homeostasis is severely disrupted and adequate hormone re-regulation urgently needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the specific changes in posttraumatic insulin and OCN levels according to the preceding peripheral and/or central trauma and to further clarify the modulating role of leptin, by comparing the posttraumatic hormone changes of WT- and leptin-deficient mice.
2. Results
2.1. Insulin in WT-Mice
In our experiments on WT-mice, all animals in the three trauma groups, but especially mice after femur fracture and combined trauma, showed notably higher postoperative insulin values compared to the control group. Those values rose from two hours until two weeks after trauma, showing the overall highest values in animals after combined trauma (see Table 1). Three to four weeks after trauma, insulin levels slowly decreased to baseline and control values in all trauma groups, leaving values elevated the longest after Fx and combined trauma (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Fracture | TBI | Combined | Control | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insulin 2 Hours | Median in pg/mL | 177 | 162 | 237 | 142 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 106 | 115 | 137 | 146 | |
Insulin 1 Week | Median in pg/mL | 189 | 148.5 | 225 | 138 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 138 | 159 | 84 | 240 | |
Insulin 2 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 211.5 | 234 | 252 | 85.5 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 176 | 423 | 210 | 71 | |
Insulin 3 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 113 | 127.5 | 229.5 | 117.5 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 124 | 171 | 241 | 98 | |
Insulin 4 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 102 | 229 | 138 | 167 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 180 | 153 | 33 | 47 |
Accordingly, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for further investigating trauma-specific differences showed highly significant group differences at two hours, two and three weeks after trauma (p = 0.000, 0.001 and 0.005). Post-hoc-analysis using Bonferroni correction confirmed significant and highly significant elevated insulin levels two hours after combined trauma compared to TBI and controls (p = 0.038 and <0.001). Two weeks after trauma, no group-specific significance could be traced, while all trauma groups had significantly and highly significantly elevated insulin values compared to control mice p = 0.047 (Fx), 0.004 (TBI), and 0.001 (combined trauma). Three weeks after trauma, the combined group again showed significantly the highest values even compared to the Fx and TBI group (p = 0.02 and 0.009) (see Figure 3).
2.2. Osteocalcin in WT-Mice
In contrast to insulin, in WT-mice, compared to controls, OCN levels were only slightly elevated two hours after Fx and even more distinct after combined trauma. One week later, OCN levels in these groups fell below control levels before they started to rise again from week two onwards. Surprisingly, TBI animals showed a small increase in OCN levels compared to controls two hours after surgery, which further extended until week three before starting to decrease again (See Table 2). Similar to the development in insulin levels, OCN values approximated normal and control values from week three after surgery, whereas normalization after TBI was delayed compared to the other trauma groups and combined trauma animals surpassed control and baseline levels from week three onwards (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Fracture | TBI | Combined | Control | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCN 2 Hours | Median in pg/mL | 50,064 | 49,638 | 51,891 | 46,701 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 22,098 | 27,636 | 21,870 | 21,951 | |
OCN 1 Week | Median in pg/mL | 34,263 | 39,078 | 27,711 | 38,490 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 14,703 | 24,588 | 14,965 | 16,536 | |
OCN 2 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 41,892 | 61,596 | 29,733 | 43,104 |
Interquartile Rangein pg/mL | 10,686 | 44,613 | 23,728 | 16,818 | |
OCN 3 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 42,093 | 68,655 | 55,104 | 51,717 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 13,593 | 16,605 | 35,964 | 22,371 | |
OCN 4 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 53,106 | 44,862 | 64,470 | 55,719 |
Interquartile Rangein pg/mL | 24,728 | 30,109 | 36,600 | 16,362 |
For further investigation of potentially significant group differences, an ANOVA was conducted, which showed highly significant trauma specific values for one, two and three weeks after surgery (p = 0.006, p = 0.000, and p = 0.001). The Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly lower OCN values for combined trauma one week after surgery compared to TBI and controls (p = 0.012 and 0.023). Two weeks after trauma, only the highly significant difference between elevated OCN after TBI and decreased OCN after combined trauma remained detectable (p = 0.000), whereas all other groups showed no significant trauma specificity. Three weeks after surgery, OCN levels after TBI were furthermore significantly increased compared to OCN levels after combined trauma, but also after Fx (p = 0.022 and p = 0.000, respectively) before all groups again reached normal OCN values four weeks after trauma (see Figure 4).
2.3. Insulin in Leptin-Deficient Mice
In leptin-deficient mice, insulin levels were highly elevated in all groups and for all time points. Additionally, there was a postoperative rise in insulin values after trauma regardless of its specific nature. Especially leptin-deficient mice after Fx showed a rapid rise in insulin, reaching the highest values already one week after surgery. Comparable high values were found in the combined trauma and TBI group not before two weeks after surgery, when insulin values in Fx animals already started to decrease again. Fx and combined trauma groups fell below baseline and control levels four weeks after surgery, whereas TBI values only reached base line and control levels (see Table 3).
Table 3.
Fracture | TBI | Combined | Control | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insulin 2 Hours | Median in pg/mL | 21,320 | 33,472 | 19,064 | 19,026 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 14,484 | 26,935 | 16,096 | 49,030 | |
Insulin 1 Week | Median in pg/mL | 82,188 | 47,934 | 25,536 | 66,022 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 84,972 | 44,307 | 73,852 | 53,700 | |
Insulin 2 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 30,419 | 84,300 | 62,772 | 36,444 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 31,299 | 62,324 | 88,050 | 24,174 | |
Insulin 3 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 3058 | 28,572 | 3992 | 17,760 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 11,615.5 | 74,414 | 6104 | 13,398 | |
Insulin 4 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 1204 | 6396 | 2177.5 | 10,825 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 1309.5 | 3407 | 1683.5 | 10,025 |
An ANOVA showed trauma-specific significances two, three, and four weeks after surgery (p = 0.008, 0.000, and 0.000). In Bonferroni correction, at two weeks, already decreasing insulin levels after Fx showed significance compared to the elevated insulin values after TBI (p = 0.034). Furthermore, with p = 0.061, at the same time there was a tendency towards significantly higher values after combined trauma compared to Fx only. Three weeks after surgery, TBI insulin values were significantly higher than those of all other groups (p = 0.000 (Fx), 0.000 (combined trauma), 0.005 (C)). Four weeks after trauma, insulin levels in the Fx group significantly fell below TBI and control levels (p = 0.039 and 0.000) and in the combined trauma group at least below control levels (p = 0.000) (see again Figure 2).
2.4. OCN in Leptin-Deficient Mice
In contrast to the insulin values, OCN levels in leptin-deficient mice were comparable to the ones in WT-mice. As already described for WT-mice OCN levels tended to drop after trauma, whereas in leptin-deficient mice also OCN levels after TBI showed a decrease instead of the elevated levels in WT-mice. In contrast to OCN in WT-mice, the lowest hormone levels for all trauma groups could be detected already one week after surgery before OCN values slowly recovered to base line but missing to reach control levels at week four. No trauma specific OCN development worth mentioning was to be observed (see Table 4).
Table 4.
Fracture | TBI | Combined | Control | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCN 2 Hours | Median in pg/mL | 36,669 | 39,258 | 40,236 | 32,046 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 21,219 | 19,158 | 28,836 | 22,068 | |
OCN 1 Week | Median in pg/mL | 9030 | 6416 | 7761 | 25,803 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 9051 | 8339 | 1284 | 17,713.5 | |
OCN 2 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 11,255 | 10,334 | 10,376 | 26,370 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 5901 | 10,270 | 8772 | 20,022 | |
OCN 3 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 40,365 | 28,419 | 43,098 | 41,238 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 30,585 | 24,532.5 | 42,006 | 18,667.5 | |
OCN 4 Weeks | Median in pg/mL | 46,320 | 47,280 | 47,334 | 68,631 |
Interquartile Range in pg/mL | 14,170 | 4149 | 24,642 | 5623.5 |
In a subsequent ANOVA, group specific differences were detected 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery (p = 0.000 each), whereas Bonferroni correction could only detect significant OCN differences between trauma groups and controls (p = 0.000–0.04), but never between the different types of trauma (see again Figure 3).
2.5. WT-Versus Leptin-Deficient Mice
In comparison to WT-levels, general insulin values in leptin-deficient mice were elevated by 250. Furthermore, without leptin, the posttraumatic rise in insulin was about 8 times as high as in their WT counterparts. However, similar to WT-mice, in leptin-deficient specimens, insulin levels equally reached their maximum about 2–3 weeks after surgery. Because of the underlying extreme hyperinsulinaemia in leptin-deficiency, no direct statistic evaluation of similarities and differences between the mouse strains was possible as insulin values differ statistically significant at all times (see again Figure 2).
General OCN levels of both mouse strains were comparable. However, in the absence of leptin, there was a higher vulnerability of hormone homeostasis with a partly significant twofold pronounced posttraumatic OCN drop among leptin-deficient animals. Group-specific OCN reactions, like mentioned above for WT-mice, could not be detected in the case of leptin-deficiency. Additionally, the posttraumatic OCN drop was prolonged without leptin and recovery not seen before week 3 after surgery (see again Figure 3).
3. Discussion
As shown in this study, insulin and OCN levels directly react to injury, significantly differ according to the trauma inflicted, and seem to be mediated by leptin, as leptin-deficiency significantly changed posttraumatic hormone patterns in mice.
It was shown that central as well as extremity trauma lead to a reactive hyperinsulinaemia and a concomitant OCN drop in both mouse strains. In comparison, extremity and moreover combined trauma had a higher impact on posttraumatic hormone changes than TBI alone. Furthermore, hormonal vulnerability was shown to be significantly elevated in the absence of leptin, which underlines its otherwise regulatory function also described, for example, by Wei et al. 2008 and Wang et al. 2011 [26,27].
It was also shown that postoperative hyperinsulinaemia seems to be prolonged in persisting central energy requirement as during tissue regeneration after TBI and even more while competing with the skeletal system for adequate glucose supply during concomitant fracture healing [28,29]. This reaction seems to reach its maximum two to three weeks after trauma independent from mouse strain. From week three post-trauma onwards, stress and, accordingly, insulin concentrations finally recover to base line and control levels. This goes alongside with tissue recovery coming to an end, as was reproduced in weekly computer tomography (CT)-scans of the healing femora of all specimens in this study and reported before [30,31,32].
Finally, our study showed that the trauma specific OCN changes seen in WT-mice were no longer detectable in the absence of leptin, which again demonstrates this hormone’s essential role in posttraumatic bone and brain specific signaling.
Although it is known that the crosstalk of brain and bone is much more complex than described in the hormone signaling pathways above, applying those pathways to the present data may nevertheless help to describe how trauma specific hormone de- and rebalancing works and how concomitant TBI may induce an accelerated healing after long bone fracture. From this perspective and according to the signaling pathways described above, the posttraumatic insulin deregulation shown in our results may be the manifestation of a posttraumatic salvage brain-pull-mechanism, also described by Peters et al. 2004 in their “selfish brain theory”. Here, an immediate central nervous system (CNS) stress reaction leads to a central SNS-activation and induces a peripheral insulin resistance via the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal-cortex-axis to secure central glucose supply [28,29]. In reaction, ß-cells in the pancreas are stimulated to produce exceptionally more insulin, which could cause the posttraumatic hyperinsulinaemia seen in both mouse strains investigated.
As also described, a thus increased SNS-signaling leads to an increased OST-PTP-synthesis in osteoblasts, followed by higher OPG activity and a loss in osteoclast proliferation and activation. This, in turn, would lead to a reduced liberation of bioactive Glu-OCN from the ECM which again could be the reason for the posttraumatic OCN-drop also seen in this study [11,14].
Furthermore, the absence of a working Insulin-OCN-feed-forward-loop in an SNS-induced lack of free un-/under-carboxylated OCN, finally would help to end posttraumatic hyperinsulinaemia, marking the end of the energy homeostasis disruption.
How this hormone de- and rebalancing actually lead to an accelerated bone remodeling in the case of concomitant TBI remains still to be answered. However, as the results from this study show trauma-specific differences in the insulin and OCN household after injury and, moreover, the lack of a trauma-specific difference within the OCN-drop in the absence of leptin, these hormones seem to play an integral part in the brain–bone interaction. CT- and histological testing conducted in the mouse femora of all specimens included in this study showed increased bone remodeling in hyperinsulinaemic and hypoosteocalceamic WT-mice with combined trauma as well as an overall lack of bone remodeling in the absence of leptin in leptin-deficient mice [32,33].
Accordingly, Ducy et al. 1996 reported an increase in cortex thickness, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone mass (BM) in the absence of OCN, which they therefore denoted as a negative regulator of bone formation [15,25]. Recent animal studies on fracture healing showed high local and systemic leptin levels after bony trauma, exercising a direct, positive effect on bone formation via receptor mediated signaling in osteoblasts [27,34,35,36,37]. Turner et al. 2013 confirmed the importance of peripheral leptin for bone formation and additionally argued that the central leptin effect has been overestimated since Ducy et al. 2000 [7,38]. They even showed a positive bone remodeling effect after intracerebroventricular leptin infusion, which, in contrast to the results of Ducy et al. 2000, points to a possible positive central leptin effect [38].
To conclude, extreme and specific alterations in hormone concentration induced via bony and central trauma are reactions to homeostasis disruption and have an impact on bone remodeling. A stress induced rise in interleukin (IL)-1 and Il-6 levels as well as cortisol levels cause an elevated peripheral insulin resistance causing changes in bone remodeling. However, especially the post-traumatic rise in peripheral leptin conducts its positive and negative direct and indirect effects on bone remodeling peripherally and via its central relay. Considering that, additionally, after TBI the blood brain barrier (BBB) is deeply impaired and the otherwise limited transfer of leptin to the CNS via specific Ob-Ra-transporters is abolished, unphysiologically elevated systemic leptin concentrations may pass unimpeded to the CNS [39,40], where they are able to cause an elevated SNS-reaction and induce a TBI specific high OCN drop or support bone remodeling by still unknown positive central leptin effects so that bone healing is accelerated in the case of concomitant TBI until the BBB is restored as shown in Figure 5.
Our study highlights the deep rooted interaction of the central, endocrine, and musculoskeletal system and teaches us to recognize brain and bone in their dynamic and interventionalist nature. Its limitations include the relatively small sample size and the restriction to measurement of insulin and Osteocalcin levels due to the small volume of serum/plasma available. Other also interesting markers like leptin, blood glucose, inflammation markers, or bone remodeling markers therefore could not be analyzed in the study. Furthermore, as there is no ELISA for under-/uncarboxylated OCN, only total OCN could be measured and no data can be given on the actual hormone levels of bioactive OCN.
For the first time, it depicts injury dependent post-traumatic hormone changes in a customized mouse model, showing stress and healing reactions of insulin and OCN as well as the essential regulatory role of leptin. Therefore, the recent study uniquely confirms the complex interplay of hormones, CNS and bone in regulating energy distribution and healing and thus shows their role in times of homeostasis and its acute disruption after trauma. Set in context with other research in this field, it helps to further clarify the underlying mechanisms of bone formation, remodeling and healing.
Posttraumatic changes in hormone levels and the role of leptin probably need to be understood in the broader context of a physiological energy homeostasis, in which central and extremity trauma mark acute disruptions in an otherwise long-term balanced system, in which, with their high energy expenditure as well as their key role in maintaining a regular energy uptake, the brain and the skeletal system act as major players.
Future research is needed to investigate the exact insulin-, leptin-, and OCN-pathways in bone healing a well as to further depict bone’s regulatory role in energy homeostasis and the CNS’s role in bone remodeling. Here, innovative and integrating approaches like neuro-endocrinology and neuro-skeletal science are needed to answer the upcoming questions about the interdependency of brain and bone in energy homeostasis.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Experimental Design
All experiments were approved by local legal representative animal rights protection authorities (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales, Berlin, G 0009/12, 4 June 2012) and carried out according to the policies and principles established by the Animal Welfare Act, the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the National Animal Welfare Guidelines.
All animals (120 female WT- mice and 120 female leptin-deficient mice, Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany and Janvier, Saint Berthevin, France (for details see below)) were randomized into four groups: isolated fracture (Fx), isolated TBI (TBI), combined trauma (combined), and control (C) with femoral osteotomy and controlled cortical impact injury (CCII) serving as variables. Twenty animals per group and strain were sacrificed after 21 days and ten animals after 28 days.
4.2. Animal Care and Perioperative Management
Female C57/Black6N mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany, n = 120, age: 12–15 weeks, body weight: 22 ± 3 g) and B6.V-Lep-ob/JRj mice (Janvier, Saint Berthevin, France, n = 120, age: 11–15 weeks, body weight: 50 ± 5 g) were kept in groups of ten in standardized cages (type III “Euronorm”) with a twelve-hour light–darkness cycle and a controlled temperature of 20 ± 2 °C. Access to food and water was ad libitum. The animals were kept in the laboratory premises for at least one week prior to inclusion in the study, in order to allow for acclimatization and minimize stress.
For anesthesia, in all procedures, isoflurane 1.5 vol% (FORENE, Abbot, Wiesbaden, Germany) was used in 0.5 L/min N2O und 0.3 L/min O2. A heating pad (37 °C) prevented intraoperative hypothermia. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was performed by a single shot subcutaneous injection of Clindamycin (0.02 mL). Skin was shaved and disinfected using 10% Braunol (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany). Subcutaneous application of Buprenorphine 0.1 mg/kg body weight (TEMGESIC, Reckitt Benckiser, Mannheim, Germany) ensured sufficient analgesia. Additionally, Tramadol 25 mg/L (TRAMAL, Gruenenthal, Aachen, Germany) was added to the drinking water (8 drops/250 mL of water) for three days postoperatively.
Animal sacrifice was performed after final heart puncture via atlanto-occipital dislocation under intraperitoneal anesthesia using 0.3 mL/kg body weight Medetomidin (DORMITOR, Orion Pharma, Bad Homburg, Germany) and 0.6 mL/kg body weight Ketamin 10% (KETAMIN, Actavis GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, Germany).
4.3. Surgical Procedures
For the Fx- and combined group, a standardized femoral osteotomy model stabilized with an external fixator was used [41,42]. A lateral longitudinal skin incision of 2 cm allowed for a mid-diaphyseal approach to the mouse femur. Dissection of the Fascia lata was followed by preparation of Musculus vastus lateralis and Musculus biceps femoris, carefully sparing the sciatic nerve. An external fixator (MouseExFix, RISystem, Davos, Switzerland) was mounted strictly parallel to the femur, positioning the pins perpendicularly to the longitudinal femoral axis. After rigid fixation, a 0.7-mm osteotomy was performed using a Gigli wire saw (RISystem, Davos, Switzerland). Wound closure was performed with Ethilon 6-0 suture (Ethicon, Johnson&Johnson, Norderstedt, Germany).
For the induction of TBI in the TBI and combined group, the standardized model of controlled cortical impact injury (CCII) was used [43]. Animals were mounted on a stereotactic device (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL USA). A sagittal and temporal incision of the skin was followed by skin mobilization and preparation of the left temporal muscle. After craniotomy of the parieto-temporal region with a micro drill, a 7 × 7 mm bone window was lifted, carefully sparing the Dura mater. TBI was induced in a standardized manner (penetration depth 0.25 mm, impact velocity 3.5 m/s, contact duration 150 ms) with a pneumatic impactor device (AMS 201, AmScien Instruments, Richmond, VA, USA). The preserved piece of cranial bone was repositioned and fixed with dental cement (Hoffmann, Berlin, Germany) afterwards in order to simulate a closed brain injury. Wound closure was performed as described above.
4.4. Blood Sampling
Blood sampling took place via consecutive puncture of the Vena facialis (two drops of whole blood of each animal; 2 h, 2 and 3 weeks postoperatively) and via final heart puncture under intraperitoneal anesthesia (3 respectively 4 weeks postoperatively). Therefore, material for hormone analysis of each specimen was very limited.
Plasma was diluted with citrate in the ratio of 1:2 and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 rpm. The cell plasma–citrate free supernatant was pipetted off and stored at −80 °C. Whole blood was centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 rpm. The cell free serum supernatant was stored at −80 °C.
4.5. Hormone Analysis
Quantitative insulin and OCN analysis were performed using mouse specific ELISA systems (Mouse Ultrasensitive Insulin ELISA, Version: 10 October 2012, Alpco Diagnostics, Salem, NH, USA, intra assay variation coefficient <9.3%, inter assay variation coefficient <11.5% and mouse osteocalcin ELISA, Immunotopics International, San Clemente, CA, USA, intra assay variation coefficient <3.7%, inter assay variation coefficient <6.1%). In spite of small sample volume (see above) pooling of samples was not necessary and data could be obtained for each specimen separately in single measurements.
4.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or Median with its 25th and 75th percentile. For better homogeneity samples producing values more than 1.5 over the 75th or under the 25th percentile were defined as outliers and excluded from further statistical analysis. For testing of normal distribution the Kolmogorov–Smirnov or Saphiro–Wilks test was applied. Group-specific differences were tested using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni correction. Differences were considered statistically significant if the null hypothesis could be rejected with >95% confidence (p < 0.05). Differences were considered highly significant if the null hypothesis could be rejected with >99% confidence (p < 0.01).
Abbreviations
OCN | Osteocalcin |
WT | Wild-Type |
Fx | Fracture |
TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury |
Combined | Combined Trauma |
C | Control |
KO | Knock-Out |
ECM | Extra Cellular Matrix |
SNS | Sympathetic Nervous System |
ESP | Embryonic-Stem-Cell-Phosphatase |
OST-PTP | Osteoblast Testicular Tyrosinphosphatase |
FoxO-1 | Forkhead Box Protein O-1 |
OPG | Ostoeprotegrin |
Runx 2 | Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 |
RANK | Receptor Activator of NF-κB |
RANKL | Receptor Activator of NF-κB-Ligand |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
pg | Picogram |
mL | Milliliter |
CT | Computer Tomography |
CNS | Central Nervous System |
BMD | Bone Mineral Density |
BM | Bone Mass |
BBB | Blood Brain Barrier |
IL | Interleukin |
CCII | Controlled Cortical Impact Injury |
n | Number |
ELISA | Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.G. and R.S.; investigation, A.G., F.G., T.L., S.T., R.S. and K.S.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, J.A., D.J., S.T. and K.S.-B.; visualization, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the German Research Society (DFG, project TS 303/1-1).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Calandriello B. Callus formation in severe brain injuries. Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis. 1964;25:170–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gautschi O.P., Toffoli A.M., Joesbury K.A., Skirving A.P., Filgueira L., Zellweger R. Osteoinductive effect of cerebrospinal fluid from brain-injured patients. J. Neurotrauma. 2007;24:154–162. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gautschi O.P., Cadosch D., Frey S.P., Skirving A.P., Filgueira L., Zellweger R. Serum-mediated osteogenic effect in traumatic brain-injured patients. ANZ J. Surg. 2009;79:449–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hofman M., Koopmans G., Kobbe P., Poeze M., Andruszkow H., Brink P.R., Pape H.C. Improved fracture healing in patients with concomitant traumatic brain injury: Proven or not? Mediat. Inflamm. 2015;2015:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2015/204842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amling M., Takeda S., Karsenty G. A neuro (endo)crine regulation of bone remodeling. BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2000;22:970–975. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200011)22:11<970::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karsenty G. Central control of bone formation. Adv. Nephrol. Necker Hosp. 2001;31:119–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ducy P., Amling M., Takeda S., Priemel M., Schilling A.F., Beil F.T., Shen J., Vinson C., Rueger J.M., Karsenty G. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: A central control of bone mass. Cell. 2000;100:197–207. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81558-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takeda S., Elefteriou F., Levasseur R., Liu X., Zhao L., Parker K.L., Armstrong D., Ducy P., Karsenty G. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111:305–317. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hauschka P.V., Lian J.B., Gallop P.M. Direct identification of the calcium-binding amino acid, gamma-carboxyglutamate, in mineralized tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1975;72:3925–3929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.3925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Confavreux C.B. Bone: From a reservoir of minerals to a regulator of energy metabolism. Kidney Int. 2011;79(Suppl. 121):S14–S19. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ducy P. The role of osteocalcin in the endocrine cross-talk between bone remodelling and energy metabolism. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1291–1297. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2155-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fulzele K., Riddle R.C., DiGirolamo D.J., Cao X., Wan C., Chen D., Faugere M.C., Aja S., Hussain M.A., Bruning J.C., et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell. 2010;142:309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee N.K., Karsenty G. Reciprocal regulation of bone and energy metabolism. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2008;8:351. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ferron M., Wei J., Yoshizawa T., Del Fattore A., DePinho R.A., Teti A., Ducy P., Karsenty G. Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism. Cell. 2010;142:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lombardi G., Perego S., Luzi L., Banfi G. A four-season molecule: Osteocalcin. Updates in its physiological roles. Endocrine. 2015;48:394–404. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee N.K., Sowa H., Hinoi E., Ferron M., Ahn J.D., Confavreux C., Dacquin R., Mee P.J., McKee M.D., Jung D.Y., et al. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell. 2007;130:456–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ferron M., Hinoi E., Karsenty G., Ducy P. Osteocalcin differentially regulates beta cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:5266–5270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711119105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hinoi E., Gao N., Jung D.Y., Yadav V., Yoshizawa T., Myers M.G., Jr., Chua S.C., Jr., Kim J.K., Kaestner K.H., Karsenty G. The sympathetic tone mediates leptin’s inhibition of insulin secretion by modulating osteocalcin bioactivity. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:1235–1242. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hinoi E., Gao N., Jung D.Y., Yadav V., Yoshizawa T., Kajimura D., Myers M.G., Jr., Chua S.C., Jr., Wang Q., Kim J.K., et al. An Osteoblast-dependent mechanism contributes to the leptin regulation of insulin secretion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009;1173(Suppl. 1):E20–E30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferron M., Lacombe J. Regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton: Osteocalcin and beyond. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014;561:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takeda S., Karsenty G. Central control of bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2001;19:195–198. doi: 10.1007/s007740170042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yadav V.K., Karsenty G. Leptin-dependent co-regulation of bone and energy metabolism. Aging. 2009;1:954–956. doi: 10.18632/aging.100100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karsenty G., Oury F. Biology without walls: The novel endocrinology of bone. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2012;74:87–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karsenty G., Ferron M. The contribution of bone to whole-organism physiology. Nature. 2012;481:314–320. doi: 10.1038/nature10763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ducy P., Desbois C., Boyce B., Pinero G., Story B., Dunstan C., Smith E., Bonadio J., Goldstein S., Gundberg C., et al. Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice. Nature. 1996;382:448–452. doi: 10.1038/382448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wei Y., Wang L., Clark J.C., Dass C.R., Choong P.F. Elevated leptin expression in a rat model of fracture and traumatic brain injury. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2008;60:1667–1672. doi: 10.1211/jpp.60.12.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang L., Tang X., Zhang H., Yuan J., Ding H., Wei Y. Elevated leptin expression in rat model of traumatic spinal cord injury and femoral fracture. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:501–509. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peters A., Schweiger U., Pellerin L., Hubold C., Oltmanns K.M., Conrad M., Schultes B., Born J., Fehm H.L. The selfish brain: Competition for energy resources. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2004;28:143–180. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Peters A. The selfish brain: Competition for energy resources. Am. J. Hum. Biol. Off. J. Hum. Biol. Counc. 2011;23:29–34. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tsitsilonis S., Seemann R., Misch M., Wichlas F., Haas N.P., Schmidt-Bleek K., Kleber C., Schaser K.D. The effect of traumatic brain injury on bone healing: An experimental study in a novel in vivo animal model. Injury. 2015;46:661–665. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Locher R.J., Lunnemann T., Garbe A., Schaser K., Schmidt-Bleek K., Duda G., Tsitsilonis S. Traumatic brain injury and bone healing: Radiographic and biomechanical analyses of bone formation and stability in a combined murine trauma model. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2015;15:309–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Graef F., Seemann R., Garbe A., Schmidt-Bleek K., Schaser K.D., Keller J., Duda G., Tsitsilonis S. Impaired fracture healing with high non-union rates remains irreversible after traumatic brain injury in leptin-deficient mice. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2017;17:78–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seemann R., Graef F., Garbe A., Keller J., Huang F., Duda G., Schmidt-Bleek K., Schaser K.D., Tsitsilonis S. Leptin-deficiency eradicates the positive effect of traumatic brain injury on bone healing: Histological analyses in a combined trauma mouse model. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2018;18:32–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kerimoglu G., Yulug E., Kerimoglu S., Citlak A. Effects of leptin on fracture healing in rat tibia. Eklem Hastalik. Cerrahisi Jt. Dis. Relat. Surg. 2013;24:102–107. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2013.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khan S.N., DuRaine G., Virk S.S., Fung J., Rowland D.J., Reddi A.H., Lee M.A. The temporal role of leptin within fracture healing and the effect of local application of recombinant leptin on fracture healing. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2013;27:656–662. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182847968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hamrick M.W., Della-Fera M.A., Choi Y.H., Pennington C., Hartzell D., Baile C.A. Leptin treatment induces loss of bone marrow adipocytes and increases bone formation in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:994–1001. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Steppan C.M., Crawford D.T., Chidsey-Frink K.L., Ke H., Swick A.G. Leptin is a potent stimulator of bone growth in ob/ob mice. Regul. Pept. 2000;92:73–78. doi: 10.1016/S0167-0115(00)00152-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Turner R.T., Kalra S.P., Wong C.P., Philbrick K.A., Lindenmaier L.B., Boghossian S., Iwaniec U.T. Peripheral leptin regulates bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:22–34. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Caro J.F., Kolaczynski J.W., Nyce M.R., Ohannesian J.P., Opentanova I., Goldman W.H., Lynn R.B., Zhang P.L., Sinha M.K., Considine R.V. Decreased cerebrospinal-fluid/serum leptin ratio in obesity: A possible mechanism for leptin resistance. Lancet. 1996;348:159–161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03173-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ghazali A., Grados F., Oprisiu R., Bunea D., Moriniere P., El Esper N., El Esper I., Brazier M., Souberbielle J.C., Fournier A., et al. Bone mineral density directly correlates with elevated serum leptin in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2003;18:1882–1890. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Histing T., Garcia P., Holstein J.H., Klein M., Matthys R., Nuetzi R., Steck R., Laschke M.W., Wehner T., Bindl R., et al. Small animal bone healing models: Standards, tips, and pitfalls results of a consensus meeting. Bone. 2011;49:591–599. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cheung K.M., Kaluarachi K., Andrew G., Lu W., Chan D., Cheah K.S. An externally fixed femoral fracture model for mice. J. Orthop. Res. Off. Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 2003;21:685–690. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lighthall J.W. Controlled cortical impact: A new experimental brain injury model. J. Neurotrauma. 1988;5:1–15. doi: 10.1089/neu.1988.5.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]