Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Veterinary Research logoLink to BMC Veterinary Research
. 2020 Dec 11;16:483. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02708-6

Changes in oxidation-antioxidation function on the thymus of chickens infected with reticuloendotheliosis virus

Dahan Yang 1,2, Chenhui Zhao 1,2, Meixi Zhang 1,3, Shujun Zhang 1,2, Jie Zhai 1,2, XueLi Gao 1,2, Chaonan Liu 1,2, Xiaoping Lv 1,2, Shimin Zheng 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC7731740  PMID: 33308224

Abstract

Background

Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) is a retrovirus that causes severe immunosuppression in poultry. Animals grow slowly under conditions of oxidative stress. In addition, long-term oxidative stress can impair immune function, as well as accelerate aging and death. This study aimed to elucidate the pathogenesis of REV from the perspective of changes in oxidative-antioxidative function following REV infection.

Methods

A total of 80 one-day-old specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens were randomly divided into a control group (Group C) and an REV-infected group (Group I). The chickens in Group I received intraperitoneal injections of REV with 104.62/0.1 mL TCID50. Thymus was collected on day 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 49 for histopathology and assessed the status of oxidative stress.

Results

In chickens infected with REV, the levels of H2O2 and MDA in the thymus increased, the levels of TAC, SOD, CAT, and GPx1 decreased, and there was a reduction in CAT and Gpx1 mRNA expression compared with the control group. The thymus index was also significantly reduced. Morphological analysis showed that REV infection caused an increase in the thymic reticular endothelial cells, inflammatory cell infiltration, mitochondrial swelling, and nuclear damage.

Conclusions

These results indicate that an increase in oxidative stress enhanced lipid peroxidation, markedly decreased antioxidant function, caused thymus atrophy, and immunosuppression in REV-infected chickens.

Keywords: Reticuloendotheliosis virus, Thymus, Oxidation antioxidant imbalance, Histopathological and ultrastructural changes, Immunosuppression

Background

Reticuloendotheliosis (RE) constitutes a group of pathological syndromes caused by reticuloendotheliosis hyperplasia virus, including runting syndrome, chronic tumors of lymphoid and other tissues, acute reticulocytoma, and severe immunosuppression. Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) is a C-type avian retrovirus [1, 2]. The REV group includes defective REV-T, non-defective REV-A, chick syncytial virus, duck infectious anemia virus, and spleen necrosis virus (SNV) [3]. In addition, REV infects a wide-range of hosts, including chickens, turkey, duck, goose, Japanese quail, and wild birds, among which turkey is the most susceptible. Thus, turkeys and chickens are commonly used as experimental animals [4–7]. REV can be mixed with Marek’s disease virus (MDV), avian leukosis virus of subgroup J (ALV-J), and chicken anemia virus (CAV), resulting in a reduction or loss of immune function in REV-infected chickens. Thus, RE represents a serious threat to the development of the poultry industry [2, 8].

Under normal physiological conditions, the body’s oxidation-antioxidant system is in a dynamic equilibrium, and oxidative stress occurs when the antioxidant system is overwhelmed by the oxidation system [9, 10]. Oxidative stress is an initial reaction of the body to external stimuli and may subsequently induce various signaling pathways and inflammation in the body [11]. Under oxidative stress, animals grow slowly, the feed conversion rate decreases, and there is a decrease in the production performance [12]. In addition, long-term oxidative stress can deplete antioxidant vitamins and trace elements, impair immune function, as well as accelerate the aging and death of the animal, resulting in substantial economic losses to the poultry industry [13].

The oxidation system primarily includes reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). ROS and RNS are by-products of the body’s metabolism that contain an unpaired electron. Moreover, ROS and RNS represent an important component of the pathogen resistance mechanism and may act as an intracellular and intercellular signaling molecules; however, excessively high levels may also lead to oxidative stress [14]. ROS primarily includes superoxide anions, hydroxyl radicals, other oxygen radicals, and H2O2. RNS includes NO, NO2, and peroxynitrite [15].

Antioxidant systems include enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants [4]. Antioxidant enzymes include SOD, peroxidase, CAT, GPx1, and glutathione reductase, whereas non-enzymatic antioxidants include fat-soluble vitamin E, carotenoids, ubiquinone, and water-soluble vitamin C, glutathione, uric acid, and tryptophan metabolites. It is worthy to mention that imbalance between oxidation-antioxidant system induced excessive ROS and RNS that accumulate and destroy various biomacromolecules (e.g., lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids), which leads to cellular damage and ultimately cell death. Several studies have shown that oxidative stress plays an important role in inflammatory reactions, tumors, and many other diseases [16–18]. It has previously been shown that anti-oxidant treatment in animals can significantly increase the antibody-secretion ability of animals during acute viral infections [19]. Some plant polysaccharides and non-enzymatic antioxidants have a good therapeutic effect on the oxidative stress caused by viral infection [20–22].

Currently, there are few existing studies that have investigated the changes in the oxidation-antioxidant system of poultry following an REV infection. This study examined the dynamic changes in the level of TAC, SOD activity, H2O2, MDA, CAT, and GPx1, as well as CAT and GPx1 mRNA expression in the thymus of one-day-old SPF chickens after an REV infection. Pathological sections and ultrastructural changes of the thymus were observed to further clarify the pathogenesis of REV infection and morphological changes resulting from oxidative stress and pathological processes, to facilitate the prevention and treatment of RE.

Results

Clinical signs and gross lesions in the thymus

The chickens in Group I showed obvious reduction in growth, The body weight growth rate was lower than that of the control chickens, and showed typical clinical symptoms (e.g., depression, loss of appetite, and messy feathers). In addition, lesions in the thymus exhibited volumetric reduction and petechial hemorrhages (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

The infected chicken exhibited typical depression. The thymus of Group I and Group C chickens at 21 days post-infection

Determination of oxidative stress biomarkers

We first sought to study the oxidative-antioxidant capacity of the thymus in chickens infected with REV. We used commercial kits to detect the level of TAC, SOD, H2O2 activity, and MDA of the chickens in both the infected and control groups. After the chickens were infected with REV, the thymus TAC (Fig. 2a) of the chickens was lower than that of the control chickens. Significant differences were found at 21 (P < 0.05), 28 (P < 0.01), 35 (P < 0.01) and 49 (P < 0.01) days post-REV infection. Compared with the control group, the SOD activity (Fig. 2b) of the thymus of the chickens decreased to varying degrees after REV infection, and exhibited significant differences on day 14 (P < 0.01), 21 (P < 0.05), and 28 (P < 0.05) post REV-infection. Moreover, the level of MDA (Fig. 2c) in the thymus of REV-infected chickens increased from day 7 to 49 compared to the control group, and exhibited significant changes on day 28 (P < 0.05). The H2O2 content (Fig. 2d) in the thymus of the chickens increased between 14 and 49 days after REV infection compared to the control group, and showed significant changes on day 35 (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the level of CAT (Fig. 2e) in the thymus showed a downward trend from day 14 to 49 in REV-infected SPF chickens, and showed significant changes on day 14 (P < 0.01), 21 (P < 0.01), and 28 (P < 0.05). The level of GPx1(Fig. 2f) in the thymus was lower than that of the control SPF chickens after REV infection, and showed significant changes on day 28 (P < 0.05) post-infection.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Changes in the oxidative stress biomarkers in chickens infected with REV. a The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the thymus. b The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the thymus. c The level of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the thymus. d The level of H2O2 in the thymus. e The level of catalase (CAT) in the thymus. f The level of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) in the thymus. Data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 5).*(P < 0.05) and **(P < 0.01) indicates a significant difference when compared to the control

CAT and GPx1 mRNA expression in the thymus

In REV-infected SPF chickens, the level of CAT (Fig. 3a) expression in the thymus decreased from day 14 to 49 compared to the control group, and was significantly decreased on day 21 (P < 0.05) and 28 (P < 0.05). From day 1 to 49 post-REV infection, the level of GPx1 expression (Fig. 3b) in the thymus of SPF chickens in the infected group was lower than that in the control chickens. Whereas, significant changes were observed on day 28 (P < 0.05) and 35 (P < 0.05).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Changes in CAT and GPx1 mRNA expression. a CAT mRNA expression in the thymus. b Level of GPx1 mRNA expression in the thymus. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 5).*(P < 0.05) and **(P < 0.01) indicates a significant difference compared to the control group

Determination of the Thymus/BW index

In SPF chickens infected with REV, the Thymus/BW index (Fig. 4) was lower than that of the control chickens, and was significantly lower than the control chickens on day 28 (P < 0.05) and 35 (P < 0.05).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Changes in the Thymus/BW index. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 5).*(P < 0.05) and **(P < 0.01) indicate a significant difference compared to the control group

Histopathological changes in the thymus of REV-infected SPF chickens

The histomorphology and ultrastructural changes of the thymus are presented in (Fig. 5). Compared with the control group, the thymic lobule was atrophied, the cortex and medulla exhibited hemorrhaging, and there was narrowing of the cortical area. In addition, there was a reduced number of lymphocytes in the medulla, an increased number of reticuloendothelial cells, and enhanced inflammatory cell infiltration. The ultrastructure of the control group appeared normal under electron microscope. However, there was obvious cell damage, which primarily manifested as mitochondrial swelling, sputum rupture, Golgi vesicle expansion, and decreased cytoplasm in the REV-infection group. In addition, the nuclear membrane was ruptured and dissolved, and the nucleolus was enlarged.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Histological and ultrastructural changes in the chicken thymus after REV infection. Histological examination of the thymus in the control group (a) and REV infection group (b) of chickens by HE staining (200x). Histological results showed significant necrosis (↑) and haemorrhage (↑) in the REV infection group. Transmission electron microscopy examination of the thymus in the control group (c) and REV infection group (d) of chickens (15 000x).Ultrastructural results showed that the REV infection group showed nuclear membrane rupture (↑), mitochondrial vacuolization (↑) and enlarged intercellular space (↑)

Discussion

Several studies demonstrated that ROS activated the immune system to eliminate the infection and played a positive regulatory role in viral infections [23, 24]. Simultaneously, the virus breaks the oxidation-antioxidant balance of the host cells, causing the accumulation of excessive amount of ROS, which results in cellular damage and apoptosis [25]. RE is an immunosuppressive tumor disease caused by REV. In the present study, we examined changes in the oxidative-antioxidative function of the thymus in chickens after REV infection. It was found that REV can cause oxidative stress in the thymus and reduce antioxidant function.

Under conditions of oxidative stress, ROS and RNS promote the accumulation of lipid peroxidation in polyunsaturated fatty acids in oxidized biofilms, and produce lipid peroxides (e.g., MDA, ketone, hydroxyl, and carboxyl) [26]. MDA can reflect the degree of lipid peroxidation in the body and can be used as an indicator to determine whether a cell is oxidatively damaged [27, 28]. In this study, the MDA content in the thymus was significantly higher on day 28 in REV-infected chickens, compared to that of the control chickens. H2O2 is an important ROS that can be scavenged by catalase or peroxidase, and can also react with free Fe2+ to produce ·OH to initiate lipid peroxidation, destroy the cell membrane structure, accelerate protein decomposition and results in nucleic acid damage [29, 30]. In this study, the level of H2O2 in the thymus on day 35 in REV-infected chickens was significantly higher than that of the control chickens. Our research shows that the level of biomarkers of oxidative stress increase in REV-infected chickens. In our previous study, REV infection caused thymic lymphocyte apoptosis, inhibited T cell proliferation, and enhanced the immunosuppressive effect [31]. Moreover, Qi et al. showed that avian influenza virus H9N2 can induce chicken oviduct epithelial cell apoptosis by ROS accumulation and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis signaling pathway [32]. Accordingly, we speculate that REV infection induces oxidative stress in the chicken thymus to produce a large amount of ROS and RNS, which may be the cause of thymic lymphocyte apoptosis.

Under normal conditions, SOD can catalyze the disproportionation of O2•− in the body to produce both H2O and H2O2 [14]. H2O2 can break the structure and function of the cell membrane, react with purines and pyrimidines, and result in nucleic acid damage [30]. Viral infection typically stimulates the production of ROS and inhibits antioxidant enzyme activity [33]. CAT can remove excess H2O2 in the body, and excess -OOH can be reduced to -OH under the action of GPx1. The main function of GPx1 is to remove lipid peroxides; however, in organs or tissues with low H2O2 production or CAT content, it can replace CAT to remove H2O2. GPx1 can scavenge lipid peroxides to reduce damage to the body and play a positive role in oxidative defense reactions [34]. CAT and GPx1 work together to clear H2O2 from the body [11]. Therefore, we evaluated the activity of these enzymes in the thymus of chickens infected with REV. This study found that REV-infected SPF chickens exhibited lower levels of SOD activity, CAT, GPx1 content, as well as CAT and GPx1 mRNA expression, and increased biomarkers of oxidative stress (e.g., MDA and H2O2) compared to the control group. In addition, we also evaluated TAC and found that the level of TAC in the thymus was significantly decreased in the infected group. This finding indicated that the antioxidant capacity of the thymus decreases during the REV infection, and excess ROS cannot be effectively neutralized by the antioxidant enzymes, which leads to oxidative stress.

Oxidative stress is related to viral pathogenesis. ROS production is caused by inflammatory cell activation (e.g., neutrophils) during the course of disease progression and is considered to be an important defense against the host virus. However, excessive ROS can have an adverse effect on the body [35]. In avian viral infectious disease research, some scholars have found that iNOS plays an important role in the pathogenic mechanism of highly pathogenic avian influenza infection in mice, and antioxidant therapy can effectively regulate the immune response of the host [36, 37]. In addition, Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) can significantly increase the level of NO and MDA in the intestines of chickens, and significantly reduce the activity of GST, CAT, SOD, and TAC. However, the addition of vitamin E to the diet can significantly reduce the level of intestinal oxidative stress in chicks and decrease the impact of viral infections on chickens [38, 39]. Some previous studies reported that Sargassum polysaccharides can resist IBDV infection by improving the antioxidant capacity and cytokine levels of chicken bursal lymphocytes [22]. This indicates that many poultry virus infections can induce oxidative stress in the body, and some Chinese medicinal extracts have significant therapeutic effects in the antioxidant treatment of poultry diseases. This study found that REV-infected chickens have lower levels of CAT, SOD, and GPx1 content, and increased MDA content compared to the control group. These findings indicate that REV infection can lead to a decrease in the level of blood antioxidants and an increase in oxidation and cause of oxidative stress in chickens. This is consistent with the results of this study on the changes in the oxidative and antioxidant capacity of the thymus of REV-infected chickens [40]. Combined with the results of this study, the growth inhibition and pathological damage in the thymus caused by REV may be related to an accumulation of oxidizing substances and a decline in antioxidant system functionality.

Conclusions

Following REV infection in one-day-old SPF chickens, the content of MDA and H2O2 and superoxide in the thymus was increased, the TAC and SOD activity decreased, and the Thymus/BW index was reduced. These changes exceeded the body’s ability to scavenge antioxidant substances, resulting in oxidative stress in the body. In the future, we aim to study the effects of REV on other physiological mechanisms in the thymus from the perspective of endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis based on the results of oxidation and antioxidant research.

Methods

Experimental birds and REV strain

All of the chickens used for experiments were one-day-old SPF chickens obtained from Harbin Veterinary Research Institute (HVRI), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China. The REV-T strain (CVCC No. CACCAV107) was purchased from China Veterinary Culture Collection Center (CVCC). The virus TCID50 was 104.62/0.1 mL as determined by cell breeding.

Experimental design and sample collection

A total of 80 one-day-old SPF chickens were randomly divided into a control group (Group C) and an REV-infected group (Group I). Group I were intraperitoneally administered with 100 µL of viral suspension at day 1. Group C were intraperitoneally administered 100 µL sterile physiological saline. The two groups of chickens were housed in isolators with similar environments, and the chickens were given free access to feed and water. Each group further consist of 8 cages (5 chickens/cage). In order to reduce the artificial error and ensure the repeatability of the experiments, we decided to set the sample size for each test index to 5 chickens, as described previously [41, 42]. During housing, animals were monitored twice daily for the health status and no adverse events were observed. On day 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 49 post-REV infection, a cage of chickens were randomly selected from each group and euthanasia was performed by sedation using a Rompun/Ketamine(1 mg/kg) mixture as an intramuscular thigh injection followed by an intravenous wings injection of Pentobarbitone (150 mg/kg). The thymus was dissected and homogenized in chilled sterile physiological saline using a glass homogenizer with a Teflon pestle under cold conditions. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used for the assessment of oxidative stress biomarkers.

Determination of thymic oxidative stress biomarkers

The prepared 10% tissue homogenate was removed from − 80 °C. The level of TAC, SOD, H2O2 activity, and MDA in the thymus was determined using commercially available detection kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute, China). The level of CAT and GPx1 was measured by an ELISA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiyi Biological Technology Co., Ltd. China).

Total RNA extraction and detection

The total RNA in the thymus was extracted by using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). The quality of RNA was assessed using a NanoDrop2 000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm. cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription of the RNA using the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Real-time PCR

Determination of CAT and GPx1 mRNA in the thymus by real time PCR. The CAT, GPx1, and β-actin primers were designed using Primer5.0 software. CAT: forward primer 5’- ATGTCCGTTTCAGGAGATGTGCAGC-3’, reverse primer 5’- CCAGCAGTGCCTGAATACG − 3’; GPx1: forward primer 5’- ATGACCAACCCGCAGTACATCATCT-3’, reverse primer 5’- GCAGTTTGATGGTCTCGAAGTGGC-3’; β-actin forward primer 5’- CGGGACGGATGAGAAGAA − 3’, reverse primer 5’- TCGGCGCTCCAGATGTAC − 3’. Amplification of the target gene using the LightCycler2.0 real-time PCR System (Roche480, USA). The real-time PCR reaction procedure was 95 °C for 2 min, 45 cycles of 95℃ for 20 s, 59℃ for 20 s, and 72℃ for 10 s. To ensure the repeatability of the amplified samples, all samples were analyzed in triplicate. β-actin was used as a reliable normalization gene, and the expression of the samples were evaluated in relation to this housekeeping gene. The level of CAT and GPx1 mRNA expression were analyzed in accordance with the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Determination of the thymus index

Weight of the chickens and thymus at the time of sampling for calculating the thymus index. The thymus index was calculated based on the weight of the thymus (g)/chicken weight(kg).

Pathological changes of the thymus following REV infection

Thymus tissues were fixed in 4% formalin. The samples were dehydrated with ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Each sample was cut into 5-µm sections with a microtome and placed on a glass slide, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The pathological changes of the thymus were observed by three pathologists unaware of the experimental conditions under both light microscope (Nikon, H600, Japan) and electron microscope (Hitachi 7650, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analyses

The data were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software, and the differences were compared between the groups were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post-hoc test. All data were expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Abbreviations

REV

Reticuloendotheliosis virus

SPF

Specific pathogen free

MDA

Malondialdehyde

TAC

Total-antioxidant capacity

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

ELISA

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

CAT

Catalase

GPx1

Glutathione peroxidase 1

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

RNS

Reactive nitrogen species

Authors’ contributions

Z.SM designed the experiments and revised manuscript. Z.MX performed the experiments of REV infection. Z.CH and Z.SJ performed the experiments of Morphological analysis. Y.DH analyzed the data and drafted manuscript. G.XL and Z.J interpreted the data. L.XP and L.CN aided with analysis of results. All authors have read and approved the manuscript and ensure that this is the case.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472169). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council’s Australian Nursing and Use Regulations, the Animal Ethics Committee of the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences approved all experimental procedures with animals (SYXK [Hei] 2011022) for scientific purposes. All procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Gao C, Zhai J, Dang SY, Zheng SM. Analysis of alternative splicing in chicken embryo fibroblasts in response to reticuloendotheliosis virus infection. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(6):585–94. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2018.1511047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li JP, Dong X, Yang CH, Li QH, Cui ZZ, Chang S, Zhao P, Yu KZ, Yang HC. Isolation, identification, and whole genome sequencing of reticuloendotheliosis virus from a vaccine against Marek’s disease. Poult Sci. 2015;94(4):643–9. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xue M, Zhao Y, Hu S, Shi X, Cui H, Wang Y. Analysis of the spleen proteome of chickens infected with reticuloendotheliosis virus. Arch Virol. 2017;162(5):1187–99. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-3180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bohls RL, Linares JA, Gross SL, Ferro PJ, Silvy NJ, Collisson EW. Phylogenetic analyses indicate little variation among reticuloendotheliosis viruses infecting avian species, including the endangered Attwater’s prairie chicken. Virus Res. 2006;119(2):187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng Z, Shi Y, Zhang L, Zhu G, Diao X, Cui Z. Occurrence of reticuloendotheliosis in Chinese partridge. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69(12):1295–8. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drew ML, Wigle WL, Graham DL, Griffin CP, Silvy NJ, Fadly AM, Witter RL. Reticuloendotheliosis in captive greater and Attwater’s prairie chickens. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34(4):783–91. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-34.4.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goodman M, Bostick RM, Kucuk O, Jones DP. Clinical trials of antioxidants as cancer prevention agents: past, present, and future. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(5):1068–84. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei K, Sun Z, Zhu S, Guo W, Sheng P, Wang Z, Zhao C, Zhao Q, Zhu R. Probable congenital transmission of reticuloendotheliosis virus caused by vaccination with contaminated vaccines. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saeidnia S, Abdollahi M. Toxicological and pharmacological concerns on oxidative stress and related diseases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;273(3):442–55. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang XY, Yao JK. Oxidative stress and therapeutic implications in psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;46(10):197–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singhal A, Morris VB, Labhasetwar V, Ghorpade A. Nanoparticle-mediated catalase delivery protects human neurons from oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(11):e903. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neri M, Fineschi V, Di Paolo M, Pomara C, Riezzo I, Turillazzi E, Cerretani D. Cardiac Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Cytokines Response after Myocardial Infarction. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2015;13(1):26–36. doi: 10.2174/15701611113119990003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nunes VA, Gozzo AJ, Cruz-Silva I, Juliano MA, Viel TA, Godinho RO, Meirelles FV, Sampaio MU, Sampaio CA, Araujo MS. Vitamin E prevents cell death induced by mild oxidative stress in chicken skeletal muscle cells. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005;141(3):225–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Azadmanesh J, Borgstahl GEO. A Review of the Catalytic Mechanism of Human Manganese Superoxide Dismutase. Antioxidants (Basel) 2018;7(2):25. doi: 10.3390/antiox7020025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andersen JK. Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: cause or consequence? Nat Med 2004; 10 Suppl:S18-25. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Kotsias F, Hoffmann E, Amigorena S, Savina A. Reactive oxygen species production in the phagosome: impact on antigen presentation in dendritic cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18(6):714–29. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lam GY, Huang J, Brumell JH. The many roles of NOX2 NADPH oxidase-derived ROS in immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2010;32(4):415–30. doi: 10.1007/s00281-010-0221-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang Y, Bazhin AV, Werner J, Karakhanova S. Reactive oxygen species in the immune system. Int Rev Immunol. 2013;32(3):249–70. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2012.755176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Crump KE, Langston PK, Rajkarnikar S, Grayson JM. Antioxidant treatment regulates the humoral immune response during acute viral infection. J Virol. 2013;87(5):2577–86. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02714-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reshi ML, Su YC, Hong JR. RNA Viruses: ROS-Mediated Cell Death. Int J Cell Biol 2014; 2014:467452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Xiong W, Chen Y, Wang Y, Liu J. Roles of the antioxidant properties of icariin and its phosphorylated derivative in the protection against duck virus hepatitis. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0226-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang L, Hu YJ, Liu HL, Shuai XH. Inhibitory effect of sargassum polysaccharide on oxidative stress induced by infectious bursa disease virus in chicken bursal lymphocytes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;49(4):607–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Block G, Dietrich M, Norkus EP, Morrow JD, Hudes M, Caan B, Packer L. Factors associated with oxidative stress in human populations. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(3):274–85. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gruhne B, Kamranvar SA, Masucci MG, Sompallae R. EBV and genomic instability–a new look at the role of the virus in the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19(6):394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu B, Li A, Qin Y, Tian X, Gao M, Jiang W, Gong G. Comparative study on isolation and mitochondrial function of adult mouse and rat cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;136:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang Z, Rong L, Li YP. Flaviviridae Viruses and Oxidative Stress: Implications for Viral Pathogenesis. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019; 2019:1409582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Malik UU, Siddiqui IA, Hashim Z, Zarina S. Measurement of serum paraoxonase activity and MDA concentrations in patients suffering with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;430:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ali A, Ibrahim M, Eladl AH, Saif YM, Lee CW. Enhanced replication of swine influenza viruses in dexamethasone-treated juvenile and layer turkeys. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162(2–4):353–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Veal E, Day A. Hydrogen peroxide as a signaling molecule. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15(1):147–51. doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.3968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Y, Branicky R, Noe A, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutases: Dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(6):1915–28. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201708007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fu L, Wang X, Zhai J, Qi W, Jing L, Ge Y, Gao X, Liu C, Lv X, Zheng S. Changes in apoptosis, proliferation and T lymphocyte subtype on thymic cells of SPF chickens infected with reticuloendotheliosis virus. Mol Immunol. 2019;111:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qi X, Zhang H, Wang Q, Wang J. The NS1 protein of avian influenza virus H9N2 induces oxidative-stress-mediated chicken oviduct epithelial cells apoptosis. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(12):3183–92. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Almeida LT, Ferraz AC, da Silva Caetano CC, da Silva Menegatto MB, Dos Santos Pereira Andrade AC, Lima RLS, Camini FC, Pereira SH, da Silva Pereira KY, de Mello Silva B, et al. Zika virus induces oxidative stress and decreases antioxidant enzyme activities in vitro and in vivo. Virus Res. 2020;286:198084. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kgatle MM, Spearman CW, Kalla AA, Hairwadzi HN. DNA Oncogenic Virus-Induced Oxidative Stress, Genomic Damage, and Aberrant Epigenetic Alterations. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017; 2017:3179421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Wang J, Chen Y, Gao N, Wang Y, Tian Y, Wu J, Zhang J, Zhu J, Fan D, An J. Inhibitory effect of glutathione on oxidative liver injury induced by dengue virus serotype 2 infections in mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perrone LA, Belser JA, Wadford DA, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. Inducible nitric oxide contributes to viral pathogenesis following highly pathogenic influenza virus infection in mice. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(10):1576–84. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ye S, Lowther S, Stambas J. Inhibition of reactive oxygen species production ameliorates inflammation induced by influenza A viruses via upregulation of SOCS1 and SOCS3. J Virol. 2015;89(5):2672–83. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03529-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Awadin WF, Eladl AH, El-Shafei RA, El-Adl MA, Ali HS. Immunological and pathological effects of vitamin E with Fetomune Plus® on chickens experimentally infected with avian influenza virus H9N2. Vet Microbiol. 2019;231:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Eladl AH, Arafat N, El-Shafei RA, Farag VM, Saleh RM, Awadin WF. Comparative immune response and pathogenicity of the H9N2 avian influenza virus after administration of Immulant®, based on Echinacea and Nigella sativa, in stressed chickens. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;65:165–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang L, Jiao H, Zhao J, Wang X, Sun S, Lin H. Allicin Alleviates Reticuloendotheliosis Virus-Induced Immunosuppression via ERK/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Specific Pathogen-Free Chickens. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1856. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Swayne DE, Suarez DL, Spackman E, Tumpey TM, Beck JR, Erdman D, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG. Domestic poultry and SARS coronavirus, southern China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(5):914–6. doi: 10.3201/eid1005.030827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Olesen L, Dijkman R, Koopman R, van Leeuwen R, Gardin Y, Dwars RM, de Bruijn ND, Boelm GJ, Elattrache J, de Wit JJ. Field and laboratory findings following the large-scale use of intermediate type infectious bursal disease vaccines in Denmark. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(6):595–606. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2018.1520388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from BMC Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES