Quantification of Temozolomide in Nonhuman Primate Fluids by Isocratic Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry to Study Brain Tissue Penetration Following Intranasal or Intravenous Delivery

Abstract

A sensitive and selective ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the quantification of temozolomide (TMZ) in nonhuman primate (NHP) plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain extracellular fluid (ECF) following microdialysis. Ethyl acetate was used to extract the plasma and CSF samples, using theophylline as the internal standard (IS). ECF samples were diluted with acetonitrile prior to analysis. TMZ was separated on a Waters UPLC® BEH C18 column with an isocratic mobile phase of ammonium acetate (10 mM)-0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile (30:70, v/v) in a positive-ion multi pie reaction monitoring mode (m/z 195.5 →137.6 for TMZ; m/z 181.5→124.2 for IS). The retention time of TMZ and theophylline was 0.45 min with a total run time of 2.5 min. The method was validated over the range from 5–2000 ng/mL in NHP plasma, CSF, and ECF with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, and stability. This method was successfully applied toward the measurement of pharmacokinetic samples following various routes of drug administration.

1. Introduction

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a prodrug that is ultimately metabolized to an alkylating agent. Upon exposure to physiological pH, TMZ is spontaneously hydrolyzed to the intermediate 5-(3-methyl-triazen-1-yl) imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) MTIC further fragments to 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide and the extremely reactive methyldiazonium cation, which methylates DNA at several nucleophilic sites.

N⁷-guanine, N³-adenine, and O⁶-guanine [1]. Although the formation of O⁶-methylguanine accounts for a minority of DNA adducts formed, it is particularly cytotoxic and is correlated with TMZ-mediated cytotoxicity resulting in mispairing during replication and subsequent strand breakage and tumor cell death. TMZ is FDA approved as a first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme alongside radiotherapy and as a second-line treatment for refractory anaplastic astrocytoma [2].

Although some drugs have shown modest efficacy, there is continued interest in studying the brain penetration of certain anti-glioma agents to improve therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcome. Intranasal delivery is one route being explored as a means to bypass the blood-brain barrier, as agents can undergo direct transport along the olfactory and trigeminal nerves. Studies are ongoing at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) using rhesus macaques as a nonhuman primate (NHP) model administering several agents in a variety of routes (intranasal, intravenous, oral) to understand the extent of drug penetration into different areas of the brain, and if intranasal administration improves brain penetration vs. systemic delivery. TMZ is being studied as one such agent, since existing research demonstrated relatively high brain penetration (20%–40%) [3,4].

Nonhuman primates are an advantageous model for studying the pharmacokinetics (PK) and brain penetration of neuro-oncology agents, as the pharmacology has been predictive of that in humans [5,6]. As more researchers wade into this field, there is a lack of robust published LC-MS/MS assays for measuring TMZ in NHP fluids (plasma, CSF) as well as extracellular fluid (ECF) resulting from microdialysis (MD). MD is a technique that allows the opportunity to measure TMZ concentrations directly in the ECF of the tissue or tumor site sampled, as previously described [7]. It has previously been used to study if TMZ brain penetration is enhanced with bevacizumab [8] and cediranib in rats [9], but there is no published study for measuring TMZ from microdialysis in NHP. Several bioanalytical assays measuring TMZ have been published using LC-MS/MS instrumentation; however, these were all based on human [10] or rodent [8,11,12] biological matrices. Several additional studies have used less selective and sensitive instrumentation as well to study TMZ pharmacokinetics in rodents [13] and humans [3,14–18]. Only one study on TMZ pharmacokinetics used the NHP model, and plasma and CSF levels were measured using a less sensitive HPLC-UV assay (lower limit of quantification (LLOQ):19 ng/mL) [6]. The purpose of this report is to describe a sensitive LC-MS/MS assay that can be used to quantify TMZ concentrations in NHP plasma, CSF, and brain tissue or tumor ECF fluid in situ following MD.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Temozolomide (>98% purity), theophylline (>99% purity), hydrochloric acid, formic acid, and ammonium acetate were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Optima (LC-MS) grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). NHP plasma and CSF was purchased from Bioreclamation IVT (Baltimore, MD, USA). CNS perfusion fluid was purchased from MDialysis (North Chelmsford, MA, USA). Ultra-pure deionized water was produced from a Hydro-Reverse Osmosis system (Durham, NC, USA) connected to a Mili-Q UV Plus purifying system (Billerica, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Stock Solutions

To prepare 1 mg/mL stocks for TMZ, aqueous ammonium acetate solution (pH 3.5; 10 mM)-methanol (20:80, v/v) (henceforth referred to as “acidic methanol”) was prepared and used to dissolve TMZ. Subsequent serial dilutions of this stock were prepared in acidic methanol as working stocks for final concentrations in each matrix of 5,10,25,100,250,500,1000 and 2000 ng/mL. These same working stocks were used to prepare quality control (QC) standards for both plasma and CSF at low (15 ng/mL), mid (800 ng/mL), high (1600 ng/mL), and a 50-fold dilution (50,000 ng/mL diluted to 1000 ng/mL) level for plasma. ECF fluid (from MD) had the same low, mid, and high QCs, but used a 4-fold dilution QC up to 5000 ng/mL. The internal standard theophylline was prepared in a 1 mg/mL stock in methanol. This stock was diluted into a 1000 ng/mL solution in ethyl acetate for extractions.

2.3. Sample Preparation

2.3.1. Plasma and CSF

Calibration standards (in duplicate), QC standards (in quintuplet) and study samples were extracted from 100 μL of plasma or CSF. Because plasma and CSF samples acidified with 10% of 1 normal (N) HC1 solution to prevent degradation of TMZ [15], all standards were acidified with 10% 1 N HC1 to match study samples. A liquid-liquid extraction using ethyl acetate (containing 1000 ng/mL theophylline) was performed, with samples vortexed, centrifuged, and the supernatent (extract) dried before reconstitution in 100 μL of water-acetonitrile-formic acid (50:50:0.1, v/v/v).

2.3.2. MD Extracellular Fluid

Extracellular brain fluid was drawn from various locations using MD technique, as previously described [7], that typically only produces ~10–20 (μL of ECF per draw (depending on collection time [over several hours] and pump flow rate). Further, ECF itself can vary in its salinity based on sampling site. To account for such low volumes of high salinity (that suppresses ion signals in the mass spectrometer) and acidity (that can non-uniformly affect compound ionization), while maintaining a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 ng/mL, a new sample preparation procedure was developed. Drug free perfusion fluid was acidified with 1 N HC1 before use in preparation of calibration and QC standards. A volume of 20 μL was needed to perform this procedure, thus if study samples were below this mark, acidified perfusion fluid (same as that used to make standards) was used to dilute study samples up to the 20 μL mark. Acetonitrile (1 mL) was added to each sample to aid in aqueous evaporation via the formation of an azeotropic mixture. The leftover dried residue contains drug and salts that is then reconstituted in 100 (μL of ACN, vortexed, and centrifuged to form a pellet of precipitated salts, thereby avoiding injection from the UHPLC system. Injection volumes were 20 (μL. No IS in the initial preparation of MD samples due to the non-uniform ionization that occurred from varying levels of sample acidity, which was difficult to control for, and for the sake of simplicity the IS was left out.

2.4. Instrument Conditions

A Waters ACQUITY UPLC® (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) was used to chromatographically separate TMZ and the IS from unwanted biological remnants post extraction on a Waters UPLC® BEH C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) column (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) using an isocratic composition of 10 mM ammonium acetate (10 mM)-acetonitrile (ACN)-formic acid (30:70:0.1, v/v/v) delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Retention times were 0.45 min for both TMZ and the IS. The column eluent was directed into a Micromass (Waters) Quattro Micro® triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization source operated in the positive ion mode. Mass spectrometer conditions were: capillary voltage 3000 V, cone voltage 35 V, RF lens 5, extractor 5, source temperature 120 °C, desolvation temperature 350 °C, cone gas flow 30 L/h, desolvation gas flow 900 L/h. TMZ and theophylline (IS) were both selectively identified based on their multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions: m/z 195.5→137.6 (TMZ); m/z 181.5→424.2 (IS) (Figure 1). Both MRM transitions had a dwell time of 200 ms and collision energy of 15eV.

Figure 1.

Structures of temozolomide (TMZ) (A) and the internal standard theophylline (B), with proposed mass spectral fragmentation patterns.

2.5. Validation

2.5.1. Linearity

This assay was validated according to FDA recommended guidelines for bioanalytical validation [19] for linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, and various stability tests. The calibration range in all three matrices (NHP plasma, CSF, MD perfusion fluid) was 5–2000 ng/mL, with dilution capabilities up to 50,000 ng/mL in plasma and CSF, and up to 5000 ng/mL in MD perfusion fluid. A least squares linear regression model was used to assess the calibration linearity, with a weighting factor of 1/x², with x being the ratio of peak areas for analyte/IS. Fresh calibration standards were prepared daily in drug-free matrices in duplicate. A linear regression correlation of at least r² > 0.99 was deemed acceptable.

2.5.2. Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and precision were evaluated by determining TMZ at four different concentrations of QC samples (low-range, mid-range, high-range, 50-fold dilution for plasma; 4-fold dilution for MD perfusion fluid), in five replicates analyzed over 3–4 different days, depending on scarcity of matrix. Each run consisted of blank matrix extracts, internal standard only extracts, calibration standards in duplicate, and QC samples in replicates of five. Accuracy (% DEV) was defined as the percent mean observed concentration relative to the nominal concentration. Assay repeatability, or precision, was determined by both the within-run precision (WRP) and between-run (BRP), as calculated below.

$$\text{WRP}=100\times \left[{\left({\text{MS}}_{\text{WIT}}\right)}^{0.5}/\text{GM}\right]$$ (1)

$$\text{BRP}=100\times \left[{\left(\left\{{\text{MS}}_{\text{BET}}-{\text{MS}}_{\text{WIT}}\right\}/n\right)}^{0.5}/\text{GM}\right]$$ (2)

GM represents the grand mean, MS_WIT represents within-group mean squared, MS_BET represents between-group mean squared, and n represents the number of repetitions. FDA guidelines for bioanalytical validation were followed, with ±15% variability in accuracy and precision allowed [19].

2.5.3. Stability

Stability tests were performed to examine the potential for degradation of TMZ in plasma and CSF during freeze/thaw cycles. Samples were assayed at three concentrations (15, 800,1600 ng/mL) in quintuplet in each matrix. The samples were subjected to three freeze/thaw cycles at −80 °C (two cycles for CSF due to scarcity of matrix), with each freeze cycle lasting at least 12 h. The analyte concentration after each storage period was compared to the concentration of freshly prepared samples in the same analytical run. Freeze/thaw stability was not assessed in MD perfusion fluid, as these study samples were immediately processed and analyzed the same day they were drawn, and due to low collection volumes, there was no opportunity for freezing and re-running.

2.5.4. Extraction Recovery and Matrix Effects

For the calculation of the extraction recovery and matrix effects, three sets were prepared. Set 1 was composed of stock solutions of TMZ spiked into the reconstitution solution ([50/50/0.1, v/v/v] water/ACN/formic acid) at low (25 ng/mL) and high (1000 ng/mL) concentrations in triplicate; set 2 was composed of stock solutions of TMZ spiked into NHP plasma at low (25 ng/mL) and high (1000 ng/mL) concentrations after extraction in triplicate; set 3 was composed of stock solutions of TMZ spiked into NHP plasma at low (25 ng/mL) and high (1000 ng/mL) concentrations before extraction in triplicate. Only the peak area of the analyte was taken into consideration for the calculation of each evaluation. The extraction recovery and matrix effects of TMZ in NHP plasma were calculated as shown below.

$$\%\text{\hspace{0.17em}Extraction\hspace{0.17em}Recovery=}A/B\times 100$$ (3)

$$\begin{gathered} A=\text{mean\hspace{0.17em}area\hspace{0.17em}count\hspace{0.17em}of\hspace{0.17em}Set\hspace{0.17em}}3\text{\hspace{0.17em}for\hspace{0.17em}one\hspace{0.17em}concentration\hspace{0.17em}level} \\ B=\text{mean\hspace{0.17em}area\hspace{0.17em}count\hspace{0.17em}of\hspace{0.17em}Set\hspace{0.17em}}2\text{\hspace{0.17em}for\hspace{0.17em}one\hspace{0.17em}concentration\hspace{0.17em}level} \end{gathered}$$ (4)

$$\%\text{\hspace{0.17em}Matrix\hspace{0.17em}Effect}=(\text{slope\hspace{0.17em}of\hspace{0.17em}calibration\hspace{0.17em}curve\hspace{0.17em}from\hspace{0.17em}standards\hspace{0.17em}prepared\hspace{0.17em}via\hspace{0.17em}Set\hspace{0.17em}}2-\text{\hspace{0.17em}standards\hspace{0.17em}prepared\hspace{0.17em}via\hspace{0.17em}Set\hspace{0.17em}}1)/\text{standards\hspace{0.17em}prepared\hspace{0.17em}via Set\hspace{0.17em}}1\times 100$$ (5)

2.6. Application

This validated analytical method was tested for applicability by analyzing plasma and CSF from a male rhesus macaque given a 20 mg dose of TMZ via intranasal injection (in a 1 mL solution; ~1.75 mg/kg). Blood (eventually processed into 1 mL of plasma acidified with 100 (μL HC1) and CSF (300 μL acidified with 30 μL HC1) were collected at the following times in order to capture the full in vivo disposition: pre-dose, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 24 h post-dose. Acidification of study samples and standards was based on previous data regarding the instability of TMZ in human plasma [17]. Additionally, the same animal was later dosed with a second dose (10 mg/kg) of TMZ administered via 1-h intravenous infusion, with plasma and CSF sampling occurring at pre-dose, 30 min, 1 h (end of infusion), 1.25,1.5, 2,3, and 4 h post infusion-start. Microdialysis probes were placed in the animal’s cortex and pons, and brain perfusion dialysate was collected in HCl-coated tubes from each area for approximately 3.5 h and 4 h, respectively. The data presented here were simply for assay applicability and were not meant to represent a comprehensive pharmacokinetic analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Selectivity

Temozolomide and theophylline (Figure 1) eluted at the same retention time of 0.45 min, however due to their differing precursor and production masses, this LC-MS/MS assay was able to identify each compound based on its fragmentation. Figure 2 depicts the chromatograms for drug-free plasma extract (A), with internal standard (B) showing no cross-talk to the analyte transition, the LLOQ of 5 ng/mL (C) and a study sample (D). There was a minor plasma contaminant that eluted near (0.6 min) the analyte retention time, but did not interfere with peak area estimation or quantification.

Figure 2.

Chromatograms of (A) a blank plasma extract; (B) internal standard only extract; (C) the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ); and (D) a single plasma sample from a nonhuman primate (NHP) measured 15 min following a 20 mg dose.

3.2. Validation

The calibration standards, ranging from 5–2000 ng/mL, were prepared in duplicate on each of four days (n = 8), cxcept in CSF (three days, n = 6). The eight calibration standards proved accurate and precise in each matrix with a mean (±SD) calibration curve linear correlation (r²) of 0.9984 ± 0.0006 (n = 4) in plasma, 0.9975 ± 0.0007 (n = 3) in CSF, and 0.9949 ± 0.0019 (n = 4) in ECF (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Calibration curves in NHP plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and microdialysis extracellular fluid over the range of 5–2000 ng/mL.

Four quality control (QC) samples, at low (15 ng/mL), mid (800 ng/mL), high (1600 ng/mL), and 50-fold diluted (50,000 ng/mL diluted to 1000 ng/mL) concentrations, were run in quintuplet daily over four days (n = 20) in plasma and ECF, three days (n = 15) in CSF. All QC levels proved accurate and precise, within the required ≤15% (Tables 1–3).

Table 1.

Accuracy and Precision Nonhuman Primate Plasma.

Nominal (ng/mL)	GM (ng/mL)	SD (ng/mL)	Accuracy (%)	WRP (%)	BRP (%)	n
15	15.5	2.9	103	13.7	14.7	20
800	795	45.2	99.4	5.2	2.6	20
1600	1593	76.3	99.5	4.5	1.9	20
50,000	50,325	5,150	101.	7.0	8.4	20

Table 3.

Accuracy and Precision Nonhuman Primate microdialysis (MD) Prefusion Fluid.

Nominal (ng/mL)	GM (ng/mL)	SD (ng/mL)	Accuracy (%)	WRP (%)	BRP (%)	n
15	15.1	1.8	101	8.0	8.6	20
800	8109	59.4	101	6.8	2.3	20
1600	1646	149	103	8.7	3.9	20
5000	5289	331	106	4.9	4.2	20

Note: GM, grand mean; SD, standard deviation; DEV (%) relative deviation from nominal value; WRP, within-run precision; n, number of replicate observations within each validation run.

3.3. Stability

Temozolomide was stable through at least two freeze/thaw cycles in NHP CSF and three cycles in plasma, where changes in measured values at each of the three concentrations after each freeze/thaw cycle were below 5% in plasma and 11% in CSF, indicating no significant degradation. The 24-h post-preparative stability measurements were consistent with the initial run (<10% change), allowing samples to be reanalyzed on the following day when necessary without significant degradation.

3.4. Extraction Recovery and Matrix Effects

The extraction recoveries for the low (25 ng/mL) and high (1000 ng/mL) concentrations were 88.6% and 89.4%, respectively. Matrix effects induced a 47% decrease in signal due to ion suppression. These data suggest the ethyl acetate liquid extraction is adequate for sample cleanup for sensitive, quantitative measurements.

3.5. Clinical Application

Following a single intranasal bolus delivery of 20 mg in a 1 mL solution (~1.75 mg/kg), both plasma and CSF concentrations of TMZ decreased in a mono-exponential manner over a 24-h sampling period, with CSF penetrance of approximately 40% in this individual specimen (Figure 4A). Additionally, this assay was capable of measuring TMZ from in situ microdialysate in the pons and cortex ECF following a 1-h intravenous infusion (10 mg/kg) (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

TMZ plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration vs time curve from a single NHP dosed with 20 mg intranasally with 24 h sampling (A); and TMZ plasma, CSF, and microdialysis (MD) sampling of extracellular fluid (ECF) from the cortex (over a 3.5 h sampling period) and pons (4-h sampling period) following a 1-h continuous intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg (B).

4. Conclusions

This paper describes an ultra HPLC-MS/MS method designed for the quantitative measurement of TMZ in nonhuman primate plasma, CSF, and ECF taken directly from designated areas in the brain inserted with MD probes. This method proved sensitive (LLOQ 5 ng/mL), selective, accurate, precise, and efficient at recovering drug from NHP plasma (~90% recovery). TMZ was found to be stable through multiple freeze/thaw cycles in both NHP plasma and CSF and post-preparation after 24-h. Ultimately, this concentration data can be used to describe the PK in each matrix, as well as brain penetration analysis and direct drug brain concentration measurement in situ.

Table 2.

Accuracy and Precision Nonhuman Primate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Nominal (ng/mL)	GM (ng/mL)	SD (ng/mL)	Accuracy (%)	WRP (%)	BRP (%)	n
15	13.3	1.4	88.6	10.0	3.1	15
800	809	54.4	101	4.2	6.2	15
1600	1583	102	99	6.2	1.8	15
50,000	51,580	5373	96.8	9.6	4.8	15

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

UHPLC

ultra-high performance liquid chromatography

MS

mass spectrometry

MS/MS

tandem mass spectrometry

QC

Quality control

LLOQ

Lower limit of quantification

NHP

nonhuman primates

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

MD

microdialysis

PK

pharmacokinetics

ECF

extracellular fluid