Abstract
Objective
The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of progranulin insufficiency on extracellular vesicles (EVs), a heterogeneous population of vesicles that may contribute to progression of neurodegenerative disease. Loss‐of‐function mutations in progranulin (GRN) are a major cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and brains from GRN carriers with FTD (FTD‐GRN) exhibit signs of lysosomal dysfunction. Lysosomal dysfunction may induce compensatory increases in secretion of exosomes, EVs secreted from the endolysosomal system, so we hypothesized that progranulin insufficiency would increase EV levels in the brain.
Methods
We analyzed levels and protein contents of brain EVs from Grn–/– mice, which model the lysosomal abnormalities of FTD‐GRN patients. We then measured brain EVs in FTD‐GRN patients. To assess the relationship of EVs with symptomatic disease, we measured plasma EVs in presymptomatic and symptomatic GRN mutation carriers.
Results
Grn–/– mice had elevated brain EV levels and altered EV protein contents relative to wild‐type mice. These changes were age‐dependent, occurring only after the emergence of pathology in Grn–/– mice. FTD‐GRN patients (n = 13) had elevated brain EV levels relative to controls (n = 5). Symptomatic (n = 12), but not presymptomatic (n = 7), GRN carriers had elevated plasma EV levels relative to controls (n = 8).
Interpretation
These data show that symptomatic FTD‐GRN patients have elevated levels of brain and plasma EVs, and that this effect is modeled in the brain of Grn–/– mice after the onset of pathology. This increase in EVs could influence FTD disease progression, and provides further support for EVs as potential FTD biomarkers.
Keywords: frontotemporal dementia, progranulin, extracellular vesicle, exosome
Introduction
Loss‐of‐function mutations in the progranulin gene (GRN) are among the most common genetic causes of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), accounting for around 5% of all FTD cases and up to 25% of familial FTD cases. 1 , 2 , 3 Most of these mutations cause progranulin haploinsufficiency, primarily through nonsense‐mediated decay. 1 , 2 Progranulin haploinsufficiency is, therefore, thought to drive FTD pathogenesis in GRN mutation carriers.
Lysosomal dysfunction may be a mechanism by which progranulin haploinsufficiency causes FTD. Individuals homozygous for GRN mutations, resulting in nearly complete progranulin deficiency, develop the lysosomal storage disorder Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (NCL). 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Heterozygous GRN carriers typically have less than 50% of normal circulating progranulin levels, 9 , 10 and develop FTD. However, brains from these FTD‐GRN patients exhibit signs of lysosomal dysfunction such as elevated lipofuscin accumulation, 11 elevated levels of lysosomal proteins, 12 and impaired activity of the lysosomal enzymes cathepsin D 11 , 13 and β‐glucocerebrosidase. 14 , 15 , 16 These lysosomal deficits impair the autophagy‐lysosomal system in progranulin‐insufficient neurons 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 and may underlie the impaired phagocytosis and antigen processing of progranulin‐insufficient microglia and macrophages. 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23
Lysosomes are a key component of the cellular endolysosomal system, a system of vesicular traffic in which early endosomes formed at the cell membrane may recycle back to the cell membrane or mature into late endosomes, which may fuse with lysosomes for degradation of their contents. Lysosomal dysfunction may disrupt endolysosomal trafficking, particularly in multivesicular bodies (MVBs), late endosomal vesicles that contain many intraluminal vesicles. MVBs may fuse with lysosomes for degradation of their contents, but may also undergo exocytosis and release their intraluminal vesicles as exosomes, a type of extracellular vesicle (EV). 24 Impairment of lysosomal activity results in increased secretion of EVs, possibly as a compensatory response. 25 In the context of disease, EV secretion may allow cells to reduce their burden of lysosomal storage material 26 or pathological proteins. 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 While this may be beneficial for the cells secreting EVs, it may also spread pathological proteins to other cells throughout the brain. 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36
Data on the effects of progranulin insufficiency on EV secretion are mixed, and may indicate cell‐type–specific changes in EV secretion due to progranulin insufficiency. Fibroblasts from GRN mutation carriers secreted fewer EVs than controls, but knockdown of progranulin in SH‐SY5Y cells appeared to increase EV secretion. 37 There is increasing evidence that EV secretion in the brain plays a role in progression of neurodegenerative disease, 30 , 33 , 35 , 38 , 39 so we were particularly interested in how progranulin insufficiency affects EV secretion in the brain. Given the lysosomal abnormalities in the brain of both progranulin‐insufficient mice and FTD‐GRN patients, we hypothesized that progranulin insufficiency would increase brain exosome secretion, resulting in an increase in total EV levels in the brain.
Methods have been developed to isolate vesicles from brain tissue that have the physical characteristics and classic protein and nucleic acid markers of EVs such as exosomes, 40 , 41 so we tested our hypothesis by analyzing EV levels in brains of progranulin‐insufficient mice and FTD‐GRN patients. We also measured EV levels in plasma from GRN mutation carriers. As in the brain, we hypothesized that progranulin insufficiency might increase plasma EV levels through either lysosomal dysfunction or increased inflammation. Lymphoblasts from GRN carriers accumulate lysosomal storage material, a sign of lysosomal dysfunction. 11 Additionally, progranulin is highly expressed by monocytes and macrophages, and progranulin‐insufficient macrophages exhibit abnormal cytokine secretion and impaired antigen processing. 20 , 23 This approach allowed us to examine EV levels in GRN mutation carriers prior to end‐stage disease, as we measured EV levels in plasma from FTD‐GRN patients and presymptomatic GRN mutation carriers.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Wild‐type, Grn+/–, and Grn–/– littermates were used for this study, and were generated as previously described. 42 , 43 Both male and female mice were included in the study. The mice were housed in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care‐accredited facility, under conditions previously described. 44 All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
For hemibrain collection, mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (200 mg/kg Fatal Plus, Vortech Pharmaceuticals) and transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline. Brains were removed, bisected into hemibrains, and immediately frozen on dry ice. Frozen hemibrains were kept at −80°C until EV isolation.
Patient brain samples
Post mortem brain samples were provided by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank, plus one case from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Alzheimer’s Disease Center. Brains were donated with the consent of the patients or their surrogates in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the research was approved by the UCSF Committee on Human Research and UAB Institutional Review Board. Tissue blocks were dissected from the inferior frontal gyrus of 5 controls and 13 patients with FTD‐GRN. All patients with FTD‐GRN carried a pathogenic variant in GRN and had FTLD‐TDP, Type A identified at autopsy (Table 1). Clinical and neuropathological diagnoses were made using standard diagnostic criteria. 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49
Table 1.
Case | Group | Sex | Age at death | PMI (hours) | Clinical Diagnosis | Primary Path Diagnosis* | Other Path Diagnosis** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ctrl | F | 86 | 6.4 | Control | N/A | AGD, limbic; VBI |
2 | Ctrl | F | 81 | 30.3 | MCI, amnestic | PART | None |
3 | Ctrl | M | 76 | 8.2 | Control | N/A | AGD, limbic |
4 | Ctrl | M | 77 | 4.9 | MCI, executive | AGD | VBI, microinfarct in cerebellar folia |
5 | Ctrl | F | 86 | 7.8 | Control | N/A | VBI, microinfarcts in claustrum and angular gyrus; AGD |
6 | GRN | M | 66 | 10.1 | DLB, ?bvFTD | LBD | Incipient FTLD‐TDP‐A |
7 | GRN | M | 72 | 23.8 | PPA‐mixed | FTLD‐TDP‐A | Subdural hematoma |
8 | GRN | M | 74 | 30.9 | nfvPPA, CBS | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
9 | GRN | F | 73 | 20.7 | nfvPPA, CBS | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
10 | GRN | F | 66 | 7.4 | bvFTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
11 | GRN | M | 64 | 7.2 | bvFTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
12 | GRN | F | 70 | 9.1 | PPA, unspecified | FTLD‐TDP‐A | Hippocampal Sclerosis, VBI, ischemic infarct |
13 | GRN | F | 56 | 7.6 | bvFTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
14 | GRN | F | 78 | 19 | mixed FTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
15 | GRN | F | 66 | 17.1 | bvFTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
16 | GRN | F | 64 | 10.5 | CBS | FTLD‐TDP‐A | None |
17 | GRN | M | 72 | 7.2 | AD | AD, FTLD‐TDP‐A? | Hippocampal Sclerosis |
18 | GRN | F | 69 | 11 | bvFTD | FTLD‐TDP‐A | Pre‐Hippocampal Sclerosis |
AGD, argyrophilic grain disease; CAA, Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; CBS, Corticobasal syndrome; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; LBD, Lewy body disease; MCI, Mild cognitive impairment; nfv, nonfluent variant; PART, Primary age‐related tauopathy; PMI, post mortem interval, PPA, Primary progressive aphasia; VBI, Vascular brain injury.
Disease considered most likely to explain the clinical syndrome.
No control subject had limbic TDP‐43 proteinopathy.
Patient plasma samples
EVs were isolated from archived plasma samples collected at the University of California, San Francisco. Venous blood was collected in EDTA tubes with the consent of the patients or their surrogates in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the research was approved by the UCSF Committee on Human Research. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1500 x g for 15 minutes to isolate plasma, which was stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples were analyzed from 8 controls, 7 presymptomatic GRN carriers, and 12 symptomatic GRN patients. Symptomatic GRN patients were defined as individuals carrying a pathogenic GRN mutation who were also diagnosed with a neurodegenerative disorder. While most GRN patients were diagnosed with an FTD spectrum disorder, several presented with clinical syndromes consistent with amnestic MCI or Alzheimer’s disease (cases 11, 14, 18) or Parkinson’s disease (case 12). Presymptomatic GRN carriers carried a pathogenic GRN mutation, but were clinically normal at the time of sample collection. Two patients (cases 23 and 27) developed symptoms at later times, which is noted in Table 2.
Table 2.
Case | Group | Sex | Age at Collection | Age at Symptoms Onset | Clinical Diagnosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ctrl | F | 82 | 0 | – |
2 | Ctrl | F | 69 | 0 | – |
3 | Ctrl | F | 78 | 0 | – |
4 | Ctrl | M | 72 | 0 | – |
5 | Ctrl | F | 74 | 0 | – |
6 | Ctrl | F | 59 | 0 | – |
7 | Ctrl | F | 61 | 0 | – |
8 | Ctrl | F | 56 | 0 | – |
9 | GRN | F | 75 | 72 | FTD a |
10 | GRN | F | 55 | 51 | FTD a |
11 | GRN | M | 70 | 62 | Alzheimer’s Disease (probable) c |
12 | GRN | M | 62 | ** | Parkinson's Disease, cognitively normal |
13 | GRN | F | 72 | 68 | nfvPPA |
14 | GRN | F | 70 | 60 | MCI |
15 | GRN | F | 65 | 61 | FTD a |
16 | GRN | F | 66 | 60 | FTD a |
17 | GRN | M | 54 | 52 | bvFTD b |
18 | GRN | M | 72 | 67 | Alzheimer’s Disease (probable) c |
19 | GRN | F | 61 | 54 | FTD a |
20 | GRN | F | 81 | 81 | bvFTD b /PSP |
21 | presym‐GRN | M | 61 | – | – |
22 | presym‐GRN | F | 56 | – | Mild Behavioral Issues |
23 | presym‐GRN | M | 58 | 59 | MCI, amnestic* |
24 | presym‐GRN | F | 56 | – | – |
25 | presym‐GRN | M | 43 | – | – |
26 | presym‐GRN | M | 62 | – | – |
27 | presym‐GRN | F | 70 | 70 | Subjective Cognitive Impairment* |
bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; nfvPPA, nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia.
Diagnosed according to the Neary criteria. 47
Diagnosed according to the FTD Consortium criteria. 48
Diagnosed according to the NINCDS criteria 50 .
Clinically normal at time of sample collection.
Patient had a prior diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, but had not developed cognitive symptoms.
Brain EV isolation
Brain EV were isolated using a method adapted from Vella, et al 41 (Figure 1A). Frozen hemibrains were weighed prior to slicing into 1–2 mm slices. The slices were then shaken at 225 rpm for 15 minutes at 37°C in Hibernate A medium (Life Technologies) containing 75 units of Type 3 collagenase (Worthington) per mL. Eight‐hundred μL of this collagenase solution were added per 100‐mg tissue. The slices were then triturated three times with a 25‐mL serological pipette, then returned to the incubator for another 5 minutes with shaking. A protease inhibitor cocktail (Halt protease inhibitor cocktail, ThermoFisher Scientific) was added to the solution to a 1X concentration, and the slices were triturated three times with a 1‐mL pipette. This solution is referred to as the homogenate throughout this manuscript.
The homogenate was then subjected to differential centrifugation to isolate brain EVs (Figure 1A). All centrifugation was performed at 4°C. An initial spin at 300 x g for 5 minutes pulled down large pieces of tissue and whole cells. This pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X‐100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate) and is referred to as “P1”. The supernatant “S1” was then spun at 2000× g for 10 minutes, and the resulting supernatant was spun at 10 000× g for 30 minutes. This supernatant was spun for 3 hours at 180 000× g over a discontinuous sucrose gradient of 0.6, 1.3, and 2.5 M sucrose. After centrifugation, the top 7.2 mL of liquid was removed and discarded. The remaining liquid was removed in 1.2 mL increments (fractions 1–4). These fractions were then brought to 4 mL with PBS and centrifuged at 110 000× g for 70 minutes. The pellets from each fraction were resuspended in 40‐μL TBS and frozen at −80°C until further analysis.
Consistent with prior reports, 41 EVs were concentrated in the second fraction of the gradient, which was highly enriched for EV markers (Figure 1B) and contained higher levels of total protein than the other fractions (Figure 1C). Fraction 2 had low or absent levels of markers for other organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi apparatus (Grp94), mitochondria (cytochrome C), and nuclei (histone H3) (Figure 1B). Fraction 2 contained vesicles of the typical size range of EVs such as exosomes and microvesicles (Figure 1D) that displayed typical EV morphology under transmission electron microscopy (Figure 1E–G). Proteomic analysis of fraction 2 confirmed enrichment for EV proteins (“extracellular exosome”, Figure 1H). Our subsequent analyses of brain EVs, therefore, focused on fraction 2 prepared under these conditions.
Except for nanoparticle tracking profiles, data were corrected for starting tissue weight prior to analysis. Despite being conducted by an experimenter blind to sample group identity, significant group differences were observed in starting hemibrain weight for 2‐ to 3‐month‐old mice, and in post mortem tissue slices (Figure S1). Three mice were excluded for having hemibrain weights greater than 2 standard deviations below the total group mean (one in the 2‐ to 3‐month‐old group and two in the 12‐ to 13‐month‐old group).
Plasma EV isolation
EVs were isolated from plasma using the protocol of Thery et al. 51 A uniform volume of plasma per patient (1.8 mLs) was diluted 1:1 with PBS, then centrifuged as follows, taking the supernatant for each subsequent step: 2000× g, 30 minutes; 12 000× g, 45 minutes; 110 000× g, 2 hrs. The resulting pellet was resuspended in PBS, filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter, and then spun at 110 000× g for 70 minutes. This pellet was again resuspended in PBS, then spun at 110 000× g for 70 minutes. This final pellet was resuspended in TBS and frozen at −80°C.
Nanoparticle tracking analysis
Nanoparticle tracking analysis was performed with a Nanosight NS300 particle imaging system (Malvern Panalytical). EV samples were diluted 1:500 (mouse) or 1:250 (human) in PBS prior to analysis. Data were collected from each sample over five 1‐minute intervals, which were averaged to give the final result for each sample.
Electron microscopy
EV samples were diluted with TBS, pipetted onto copper grids, and stained with uranyl acetate. Grids were then imaged on a Technai Spirit T12 transmission electron microscope (ThermoFisher).
Western blot
Homogenates and fractions 1–4 were analyzed by western blot. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford (ThermoFisher) or BCA (ThermoFisher) assay. Homogenates were loaded at 15 μg of protein per well. Since protein content in the EV fraction is related to EV concentration, EV samples were loaded volumetrically (23 μL of the 40 μL fraction) to accurately represent EV concentration in brain or plasma samples.
Samples were diluted with LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher) and Bolt sample reducing agent (ThermoFisher) prior to loading on 4–12% bis‐tris polyacrylamide gels (ThermoFisher). After electrophoresis, protein from the gels was transferred to Immobilon‐FL PVDF (MilliporeSigma), and incubated overnight with primary antibody. The following primary antibodies were used: CD81 (sc‐166029, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), CD9 (sc‐13118, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Flotillin‐1 (610820, mouse monoclonal, BD Transduction Laboratories), HSP‐70 (for brain samples, sc‐32239, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; for plasma samples, ab94368, rabbit polyclonal, Abcam), Grp94 (sc‐32249, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Cytochrome C (sc‐13156, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Histone H3 (06‐755, rabbit polyclonal, MilliporeSigma), and GluR4 (23350‐1‐AP, rabbit polyclonal, Proteintech). Blots were probed with species‐matched IRdye‐conjugated secondary antibodies (Li‐COR Biosciences) and scanned on an Odyssey scanner (Li‐COR Biosciences).
Sample preparation for mass spectrometry analysis
EVs isolated from mouse brain were lysed in 1x final NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer (ThermoFisher) via sonication in an ultrasonic water bath for 20 minutes. Following protein quantitation using an EZQ Protein Quantitation Kit (ThermoFisher), 5 µg of protein per sample was separated onto a NuPAGE 10% Bis‐Tris Protein gel (ThermoFisher) at 200V constant for 15min. The gel was stained using a Colloidal Blue Staining Kit (ThermoFisher) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each gel lane was excised (three equal‐sized fractions per sample) and digested overnight at 37°C with Pierce Trypsin Protease, MS Grade (Thermo Scientific), as per manufacturer’s instruction. Digests were reconstituted in 0.1% FA in 5:95 ACN:ddH2O at ~0.1 µg/uL.
nLC‐ESI‐MS2 analysis & database searches
Peptide digests (8 µL each) were injected onto a 1260 Infinity nHPLC stack (Agilent Technologies), and separated using a 100 micron I.D. × 13.5 cm pulled tip C‐18 column (Jupiter C‐18 300 Å, 5 micron, Phenomenex). This system runs in‐line with a Thermo Orbitrap Velos Pro hybrid mass spectrometer, equipped with a nano‐electrospray source (ThermoFisher), and all data were collected in CID mode. The nHPLC was configured with binary mobile phases that included solvent A (0.1% FA in ddH2O) and solvent B (0.1% FA in 15% ddH2O/ 85% ACN), programmed as follows: 10 minutes @ 5% B (2µL/ min, load), 90 minutes @ 5%‐40% B (linear: 0.5 nL/ min, analyze), 5 minutes @ 70% B (2µL/ min, wash), 10 minutes @ 0%B (2µL/ min, equilibrate). Following each parent ion scan (300‐1200m/z @ 60k resolution), fragmentation data (MS2) were collected on the top 15 most intense ions. For data‐dependent scans, charge state screening and dynamic exclusion were enabled with a repeat count of 2, repeat duration of 30 seconds, and exclusion duration of 90 seconds.
The XCalibur RAW files were collected in profile mode, centroided and converted into MzXML using ReAdW v. 3.5.1. The data were searched using SEQUEST, which was set for two maximum missed cleavages, a precursor mass window of 20 ppm, trypsin digestion, variable modification C @ 57.0293, and M @ 15.9949. Searches were performed with a species‐specific subset of the UniRef100 database.
Peptide filtering, grouping, and quantification
The list of peptide IDs generated based on SEQUEST (ThermoFisher) search results was filtered using Scaffold (Protein Sciences). Scaffold filters and groups all peptides to generate and retain only high confidence IDs while also generating normalized spectral counts (N‐SC’s) across all samples for the purpose of relative quantification. The filter cut‐off values were set with minimum peptide length of >5 AA’s, with no MH + 1 charge states, with peptide probabilities of >80% C.I., and with the number of peptides per protein ≥2. The protein probabilities were then set to a >99.0% C.I., and an FDR <1.0. Scaffold incorporates the two most common methods for statistical validation of large proteome datasets, the false discovery rate (FDR), and protein probability. 52 , 53 , 54 Relative quantification across experiments were then performed via spectral counting, 55 , 56 and when relevant, spectral count abundances were then normalized between samples. 57 Normalized spectra and unique peptide counts are shown in Table S1.
Experimental design & statistics
EV isolation and analysis was performed by experimenters blinded to experimental group. Nanoparticle tracking profiles (concentration by particle size) were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA with factors of particle size and genotype (or patient group) using GraphPad Prism 8. For mouse brain samples, 50–150 nm particle concentration, fraction 2 protein content, and western blot data were analyzed by ANOVA (factor of genotype). Nanoparticle tracking profiles for patient samples were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, and 55–155 nm particles in plasma samples were analyzed by ANOVA (factor of group). Western blot data for patient samples (brain and plasma) were analyzed by nonparametric methods due to very high levels in some patients. Data from brain samples were analyzed by Mann‐Whitney test, and data for plasma samples were analyzed by Kruskal‐Wallis test (factor of group). For ANOVA and Kruskal‐Wallis test, significant main effects or interactions were followed by post hoc testing compared to controls. These analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 8, with two‐tailed p values and α set at 0.05. Except where specified, data are shown as mean ± SEM.
For proteomic data, enrichment analysis was performed using David Bioinformatics Resources 6.8. 58 , 59 Protein spectra data were analyzed to compare protein abundance between mice according to age and genotype using negative binomial regression models implemented using Bioconductor in R via the DESeq2 package. 60 Spectra values were floored with zero count proteins removed from the dataset and relative log2‐fold changes calculated for contrasts of interest among the four groups. One aged Grn–/– mouse was removed from the analysis after sensitivity assessment indicated that it inappropriately drove certain effects. Abundance thresholds required at least 16x fold‐change to be considered biologically meaningful with a significance threshold of 10‐7 to account for multiplicity. Notable protein species were identified and annotated according to accession and mapped using the GO.db gene ontology database.
Results
Isolation of EVs from mouse hemibrains
To test our hypothesis that progranulin insufficiency would increase EV levels in the brain, we adapted previously reported methods for isolating EVs from frozen brain tissue (Figure 1). 41 We began by comparing levels of brain EVs in 12‐ to 13‐month‐old wild‐type, Grn+/–, and Grn–/– littermates. At this age, Grn–/– mice exhibit robust lysosomal abnormalities and lipofuscinosis. 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 Grn+/– mice also exhibit similar, but milder lysosomal abnormalities at around 12 months of age. 65 , 66 Nanoparticle tracking analysis of brain EVs from fraction 2 revealed a significantly higher number of EVs in Grn–/– mice relative to wild‐type (Figure 2A). Since the vesicles isolated from mouse brains likely include multiple EV subtypes, we assessed vesicles of the size range of exosomes (50–150 nm) to determine if the increase in EVs might be associated with endolysosomal dysfunction. EVs of exosomal size were also elevated in Grn–/– mice relative to wild‐type (Figure 2B). Fraction 2 contained more protein in Grn–/– mice than in wild‐type (Figure 2C), as well as higher levels of the EV‐enriched protein HSP‐70 (Figure 2D,G). Levels of the EV‐enriched proteins CD81 (Figure 2E,G) and flotillin‐1 (Figure 2F,G) also trended higher in Grn–/– mice relative to wild‐type littermates.
Normal levels of brain EVs in 2‐ to 3‐month‐old Grn–/– mice
After observing elevated levels of brain EVs at an age (12–13 months) at which Grn–/– mice have robust lysosomal abnormalities, we next tested whether Grn–/– mice have elevated levels of brain EVs before the onset of these abnormalities. We isolated brain EVs from 2‐ to 3‐month‐old wild‐type, Grn+/–, and Grn–/– littermates. At this age there are some changes in lysosomal enzyme activity in Grn–/– brain, 66 but Grn–/– mice have not yet developed most of the changes in lysosomal enzyme activity and lipofuscinosis that occur at later ages. 12 , 61 , 67 Consistent with this much milder lysosomal phenotype, we did not observe a significant elevation in brain EVs in 2‐ to 3‐month‐old Grn–/– mice by nanoparticle tracking analysis (Figure S2A,B), protein assay (Figure S2C), or western blot for EV proteins (Figure S2D‐F) in fraction 2.
Proteomic analysis of mouse brain EVs
The age‐dependent increase in the levels of brain EVs in Grn–/– mice is consistent with our hypothesis that lysosomal dysfunction due to progranulin insufficiency increases EV secretion in Grn–/– brain. We also hypothesized that lysosomal dysfunction could alter EV contents in Grn–/– mice. To test this hypothesis, we conducted proteomic analysis of brain EVs from wild‐type and Grn–/– littermates at ages 2–3 and 12–13 months. A total of 981 proteins were detected (Figure 3A), which included 62 of the 100 most common exosomal proteins listed in the ExoCarta database 68 (Figure 3B). Enrichment analysis revealed enrichment for exosomal proteins (Figure 3C), as in our preliminary sample.
We compared EV protein contents between groups using the normalized spectra from mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis of these data showed separation based on age (Figure 3D), and an age‐dependent separation between genotypes. Wild‐type and Grn–/– mice had similar proteomic profiles at 2–3 months of age, but diverged at 12–13 months of age. We, therefore, focused subsequent analysis on brain EVs from 12‐ to 13‐month‐old wild‐type and Grn–/– mice. For this comparison, we excluded one old Grn–/– mouse that emerged as an outlier in principal components analysis.
Analysis of 12‐ to 13‐month‐old wild‐type and Grn–/– mice revealed a total of 15 proteins with altered levels in Grn–/– mice (Figure 3D,E). Most of the proteins with lower levels in EVs from Grn–/– mice were ribosomal proteins. Among the proteins increased in EVs from Grn–/– mice were two proteins highly expressed by astrocytes (Eaat2 and α2 Na+/K + ATPase), 69 perhaps reflecting the astrocytosis that occurs in 12‐ to 13‐month‐old Grn–/– mice. 61 The protein with the largest fold increase in EVs from Grn–/– mice was GluR4. GluR4 mRNA (GRIA4) expression is elevated in FTD‐GRN patients, sporadic FTD patients, and a mouse model of FTD due to CHMP2B mutations. 70 We, therefore, immunoblotted for GluR4 in whole‐brain homogenates from a subset of the 12‐ to 13‐month‐old mice used for EV isolation. These blots revealed no significant effect of progranulin genotype on GluR4 levels, although Grn–/– mice trended toward lower levels of GluR4 in brain homogenates than wild‐type (Figure S3). The increase in EV GluR4, therefore, reflects some process other than an increase in total brain GluR4.
Elevated levels of EVs in frontal cortex of FTD‐GRN patients
We next investigated whether progranulin insufficiency increases EV levels in brains from patients with FTD‐GRN (Table 1). We isolated EVs from inferior frontal gyrus of controls (n = 5) and patients with FTD‐GRN (n = 13). As with mouse brain samples, fraction 2 was highly enriched for EV markers (Figure 4A) and protein content (Figure 4B), and contained vesicles of typical EV morphology (Figure 4C,D) and size (Figure 4E). While vesicle concentration in fraction 2 did not differ between groups (Figure 4E), fraction 2 of FTD‐GRN patients contained higher levels of the EV proteins HSP70 (Figure 4F) and CD81 (Figure 4G) than controls. Levels of flotillin‐1 (Figure 4H) trended higher but were more variable and not significantly elevated. Taken together, these data are consistent with increased levels of EVs in the frontal cortex of FTD‐GRN patients.
Plasma EVs Increase in GRN Mutation Carriers After Onset of Symptoms.
Having observed elevated levels of brain EVs in FTD‐GRN patients, we next tested whether progranulin insufficiency might alter EV levels in plasma. A major advantage of examining plasma is the ability to study samples from presymptomatic (n = 7), as well as symptomatic.
(n = 12) GRN mutation carriers (Table 2). Presymptomatic individuals were clinically normal at the time of plasma collection. Most of the symptomatic GRN patients (8/12) were diagnosed with FTD‐spectrum clinical syndromes (Table 2), although four were diagnosed with other disorders (MCI, probable Alzheimer’s disease, or Parkinson’s disease). As these were clinical diagnoses and neuropathology data were not available for most patients, all symptomatic GRN carriers were analyzed as a group.
EVs were isolated from plasma by differential centrifugation and had the expected protein composition (Figure 5A) and morphology under EM (Figure 5B,C). Similar to results from brain samples (Figure 4E‐I), symptomatic GRN patients had higher levels of plasma EVs as assessed by both nanoparticle tracking analysis (Figure 5D,E) and western blot of EV marker proteins (Figure 5F‐I). In contrast, presymptomatic GRN carriers did not differ from controls by any of these measures, and had lower levels of exosome‐sized EVs (Figure 5E) and EV marker proteins (Figure 5F,G) than symptomatic GRN carriers.
Based on these data, plasma EV levels appear to increase in GRN mutation carriers in parallel with the onset of symptomatic neurodegenerative disease. Consistent with this conclusion, the highest levels of CD9 and flotillin‐1 among presymptomatic GRN carriers were found in an individual who became symptomatic less than 2 years after plasma collection (Figure S4; Table 2, case 23), although their vesicle concentration by nanoparticle tracking analysis was not among the highest presymptomatic GRN carriers. Although these findings are from just one individual, they raise the possibility that plasma EV levels may begin to increase just before the onset of symptoms in GRN carriers. (Another GRN carrier (Table 2, case 27) who had low plasma EVs developed subjective symptoms within a year after plasma collection, but detailed research examination did not reveal objective evidence of disease onset.)
Discussion
This study reports increased EV levels in the brain of Grn–/– mice and both frontal cortex and plasma of FTD‐GRN patients, indicating that increased EV secretion is a common effect of progranulin insufficiency. Increased brain EV levels in Grn–/– mice were found only at ages after the onset of robust lysosomal abnormalities, gliosis, and accumulation of lysosomal storage material. 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 67 Increased EV levels in the frontal cortex of FTD‐GRN patients confirm the relevance of this abnormality to FTD. Paralleling the age dependence of brain EV levels in Grn–/– mice, plasma EVs increased in GRN mutation carriers only around the onset of symptomatic neurodegenerative disease, but not in presymptomatic carriers.
We did not observe significant increases in brain EVs in 12‐month‐old Grn+/– mice, which model the partial progranulin insufficiency of FTD‐GRN patients, although they did exhibit nonsignificant trends for increases in several EV measures. While not investigated in this study, Grn+/– mice might develop elevated levels of brain EVs at older ages, which would be consistent with the age dependence of the increase in brain EVs in Grn–/– mice, and the milder, later onset changes in lysosomal enzyme abnormalities observed in Grn+/– mice relative to Grn–/– mice. 66 Although Grn–/– mice model the complete progranulin deficiency that causes NCL in humans, they are a more accurate model than Grn+/– mice of the endolysosomal dysfunction observed in FTD‐GRN. 12 , 71 Thus, we consider it likely that similar mechanisms underlie the increased brain EVs of both Grn–/– mice and FTD‐GRN patients.
The disease dependence of the increase in plasma EVs in GRN mutation carriers, as well as the age dependence of increased brain EV levels in Grn–/– mice, indicate that increased EV secretion is likely not a result of progranulin insufficiency per se, but rather of cellular/lysosomal dysfunction caused by progranulin insufficiency. This is consistent with a report that fibroblasts from GRN mutation carriers secrete fewer EV than controls. 37 Instead, the increase in EV levels in brains of 12‐month‐old Grn–/– mice and FTD‐GRN patients is likely downstream of other changes associated with the symptomatic stages of disease in humans or the onset of pathology and behavioral deficits in mice. These changes might include buildup of lysosomal storage material and worsening of lysosomal dysfunction, or gliosis and inflammation. Similar mechanisms could drive the increase in plasma EVs in symptomatic GRN patients.
As we hypothesized, lysosomal dysfunction could increase EV levels by driving increased exosome secretion. Progranulin insufficiency causes lysosomal dysfunction in neurons, 11 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 71 microglia, 21 , 67 and macrophages, 72 , 73 providing potential cellular sources for increased exosome secretion in both brain and plasma. There is also a temporal correlation between increased EV levels and lysosomal abnormalities in Grn–/– mice, as the increase in Grn–/– brain EVs occurs at a roughly similar age as the onset of signs of robust lysosomal dysfunction. 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 67
Inflammation and gliosis could also increase EV levels in brain and plasma of FTD‐GRN patients and Grn–/– mice. Degenerating regions such as the frontal cortex of FTD‐GRN patients contain many reactive microglia. 74 Brains of 12‐month‐old, but not 3‐month‐old Grn–/– mice have more reactive microglia and astrocytes than wild‐type littermates, 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 and Grn–/– mice have exaggerated inflammatory responses to injury. 42 , 75 , 76 Grn–/– macrophages also exhibit exaggerated inflammatory responses to inflammatory stimuli such as LPS. 18 , 20 EVs play a role in various immune functions, including antigen presentation, and some types of immune cells secrete higher levels of EVs when activated. 77 , 78 , 79 Gliosis and inflammation could, thus, potentially increase EV secretion and alter EV protein and microRNA contents.
Further work will be necessary to evaluate the role of EVs in FTD‐GRN pathogenesis. EV secretion may have both protective and pathogenic effects in neurodegenerative disease. 30 , 33 , 35 , 38 , 39 EV secretion can relieve cells of lysosomal storage material 26 and pathologic proteins, 27 , 29 , 30 including TDP‐43. 28 However, EVs can also spread pathologic proteins such as TDP‐43 to nearby cells. 28 , 32 , 34 Due to such spreading, EV secretion contributes to both amyloid 35 and tau 33 pathology in mouse models. EVs also contain microRNA, and can spread aberrant microRNA during disease. Abnormal microRNA expression may be involved in FTD pathogenesis, 70 , 80 and FTD patients, including FTD‐GRN, have altered microRNA in EVs from cerebrospinal fluid. 81 EVs could, therefore, be a vehicle for aberrant microRNA in FTD‐GRN. Finally, EVs from plasma may be a vehicle by which peripheral immune cells could increase inflammation in the brain. 78 While the net effect of the increase in EV levels remains to be determined, the disease/age dependence of increased brain EV levels suggests that the increase in brain EVs may contribute to progression rather than initiation of FTD in GRN mutation carriers.
Further analysis of changes in EV levels and contents during the course of disease may reveal novel biomarkers for FTD‐GRN. Prior work has illustrated the potential utility of EVs as FTD biomarkers. Abnormal miRNA has been reported in EVs from cerebrospinal fluid of FTD‐GRN patients, 81 and neural‐derived plasma EVs from sporadic FTD patients have reduced levels of synaptic proteins. 82 Plasma EVs are particularly attractive as biomarkers with the development of techniques to isolate neural‐ 83 , 84 , 85 and astrocyte‐derived 86 , 87 EVs from patient plasma. Given the difference in EV levels between presymptomatic and symptomatic GRN carriers, longitudinal analysis of plasma EVs from GRN carriers might provide insight into cellular changes that occur with onset of symptomatic disease. Analysis of these EVs might provide insight into cellular changes that occur during FTD pathogenesis. For example, the increased astrocytic proteins we observed EVs from Grn–/– mice (Figure 3D) may reflect the astrocytosis present throughout the brain of Grn–/– mice. 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 Additionally, the elevated levels of GluR4 in EVs but not brain homogenates of Grn–/– mice might reflect a change in neuronal activity or glutamate receptor sorting, 22 , 88 , 89 , 90 or perhaps secretion by microglia that phagocytized synapses in Grn–/– mice. 90
A final question raised by these data is whether EVs levels are also increased in other FTD subtypes. It seems likely that patients with FTD due to CHMP2B mutations might have increased brain EV levels. CHMP2B is part of the ESCRT‐III complex that is involved in the formation of intraluminal vesicles that become exosomes after secretion from the cell. 91 CHMP2B mutations disrupt endosome‐lysosome fusion, 92 and brains from FTD‐CHMP2B patients accumulate lysosomal storage material. 93 Endolysosomal dysfunction may also play a role in pathogenesis of sporadic FTD, 94 raising the possibility that EV levels may be increased in sporadic FTD. Measurement of EV levels in other FTD subtypes might further illuminate the role of EVs in FTD pathogenesis.
Ongoing refinement of techniques for EV isolation and classification is likely to enable further discovery of how progranulin insufficiency changes brain EVs, which may provide insight into mechanisms of FTD pathogenesis. The EVs we obtained from brain tissue are likely to contain a variety of vesicle subtypes originating from distinct cellular pathways. Our hypothesis that progranulin insufficiency would increase secretion of EVs was largely focused on exosomes, which originate from the cellular endolysosomal pathway. However, current methods of isolation and analysis do not allow for the complete separation of exosomes from other classes of extracellular vesicle. 95 , 96 For example, there is some overlap in size and protein markers between exosomes and microvesicles that bud directly from the cell membrane. 96 , 97 The typical size range for exosomes is around 50–150 nm. 97 Microvesicles are larger than exosomes, but smaller microvesicles are of similar size as larger exosomes. 95 Our nanoparticle tracking profiles reveal the presence of some vesicles larger than 150 nm, supporting the potential presence of microvesicles. An additional consideration is the likely presence of small amounts of cellular debris in our brain EV samples. While our EM analysis revealed that most material from brain tissue had vesicular appearance and was in the appropriate size range for EVs (Figure 1E–G, Figure 4C,D), the presence of some smaller particles was also apparent. Future studies may, therefore, be able to specifically study the various EV subtypes with even less contamination from cellular debris, perhaps revealing even clearer changes in EV secretion due to progranulin insufficiency.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Arrant reports grants from the National Institute on Aging and Civitan International Research Center during the conduct of the study. Dr. Grinberg reports grants from AVID Radiopharmaceutics and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr. Seeley reports personal fees from Guidepoint Consulting, Corcept Therapeutics, Biogen Idec, and GLG Council, outside the submitted work. Dr. Roberson reports grants from The Bluefield Project to Cure FTD and the National Institute on Aging during the conduct of the study; grants from Alector and personal fees from AVROBIO, Biogen, and ACTC, outside the submitted work.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Bluefield Project to Cure FTD, the National Institute on Aging (R00AG056597, K08AG052648, P01AG019724, P50AG023501, and P20AG068024), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS47466), the National Cancer Institute (P30CA13148), the National Center for Advancing Translational Research (UL1TR003096), the Tau Consortium, a UAB Institutional Core Facility Grant, and the Civitan International Research Center. We thank the patients and their families for their contributions to this work. We thank Robert Farese, Jr. for providing Grn–/– mice, and James Black and Miriam Roberson for help with mouse breeding and colony management. Nanoparticle tracking and electron microscopy were performed in UAB’s High Resolution Imaging Facility.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by The Bluefield Project grant ; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant P30NS47466; Civitan International Research Center grant ; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant UL1TR003096; National Cancer Institute grant P30CA13148; National Institute on Aging grants K08AG052648, P01AG019724, P20AG068024, P50AG023501, and R00AG056597; Tau Consortium grant .
Contributor Information
Andrew E. Arrant, Email: andrewarrant@uabmc.edu.
Erik D. Roberson, Email: eroberson@uabmc.edu.
References
- 1. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering‐Brown SM, et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau‐negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 2006;442(7105):916–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin‐positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature 2006;442(7105):920–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gass J, Cannon A, Mackenzie IR, et al. Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin‐positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15(20):2988–3001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Smith KR, Damiano J, Franceschetti S, et al. Strikingly different clinicopathological phenotypes determined by progranulin‐mutation dosage. Am J Hum Genet 2012;90(6):1102–1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Almeida MR, Macario MC, Ramos L, et al. Portuguese family with the co‐occurrence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis phenotypes due to progranulin gene mutation. Neurobiol Aging 2016;41(200):e1–e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Faber I, Prota JR, Martinez AR, et al. A new phenotype associated with homozygous GRN mutations: complicated spastic paraplegia. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(1):e3–e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kamate M, Detroja M, Hattiholi V. Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type‐11 in an adolescent. Brain Develop 2019;41(6):542–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Huin V, Barbier M, Bottani A, et al. Homozygous GRN mutations: new phenotypes and new insights into pathological and molecular mechanisms. Brain 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ghidoni R, Benussi L, Glionna M, et al. Low plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 2008;71(16):1235–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Finch N, Baker M, Crook R, et al. Plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutation status in frontotemporal dementia patients and asymptomatic family members. Brain 2009;132(Pt 3):583–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ward ME, Chen R, Huang HY, et al. Individuals with progranulin haploinsufficiency exhibit features of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(385). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Götzl JK, Mori K, Damme M, et al. Common pathobiochemical hallmarks of progranulin‐associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Acta Neuropathol 2014;127(6):845–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Valdez C, Wong YC, Schwake M, et al. Progranulin‐mediated deficiency of cathepsin D results in FTD and NCL‐like phenotypes in neurons derived from FTD patients. Hum Mol Genet 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Arrant AE, Roth JR, Boyle NR, et al. Impaired beta‐glucocerebrosidase activity and processing in frontotemporal dementia due to progranulin mutations. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019;7(1):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Valdez C, Ysselstein D, Young TJ, et al. Progranulin mutations result in impaired processing of prosaposin and reduced glucocerebrosidase activity. Hum Mol Genet 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhou X, Paushter DH, Pagan MD, et al. Progranulin deficiency leads to reduced glucocerebrosidase activity. PLoS One 2019;14(7):e0212382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Beel S, Moisse M, Damme M, et al. Progranulin functions as a cathepsin D chaperone to stimulate axonal outgrowth in vivo. Hum Mol Genet 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chang MC, Srinivasan K, Friedman BA, et al. Progranulin deficiency causes impairment of autophagy and TDP‐43 accumulation. J Exp Med 2017;214(9):2611–2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tanaka Y, Suzuki G, Matsuwaki T, et al. Progranulin regulates lysosomal function and biogenesis through acidification of lysosomes. Hum Mol Genet 2017;26(5):969–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yin F, Banerjee R, Thomas B, et al. Exaggerated inflammation, impaired host defense, and neuropathology in progranulin‐deficient mice. J Exp Med 2010;207(1):117–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tanaka Y, Matsuwaki T, Yamanouchi K, Nishihara M. Increased lysosomal biogenesis in activated microglia and exacerbated neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury in progranulin‐deficient mice. Neuroscience 2013;10(250):8–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Krabbe G, Minami SS, Etchegaray JI, et al. Microglial NFkappaB‐TNFalpha hyperactivation induces obsessive‐compulsive behavior in mouse models of progranulin‐deficient frontotemporal dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017;114(19):5029–5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schmitz K, Wilken‐Schmitz A, Vasic V, et al. Progranulin deficiency confers resistance to autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Cell Mol Immunol 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kowal J, Tkach M, Thery C. Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014;29:116–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Eitan E, Suire C, Zhang S, Mattson MP. Impact of lysosome status on extracellular vesicle content and release. Ageing Res Rev 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Strauss K, Goebel C, Runz H, et al. Exosome secretion ameliorates lysosomal storage of cholesterol in Niemann‐Pick type C disease. J Biol Chem 2010;285(34):26279–26288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Alvarez‐Erviti L, Seow Y, Schapira AH, et al. Lysosomal dysfunction increases exosome‐mediated alpha‐synuclein release and transmission. Neurobiol Dis 2011;42(3):360–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Iguchi Y, Eid L, Parent M, et al. Exosome secretion is a key pathway for clearance of pathological TDP‐43. Brain 2016;139(Pt 12):3187–3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Miranda AM, Lasiecka ZM, Xu Y, et al. Neuronal lysosomal dysfunction releases exosomes harboring APP C‐terminal fragments and unique lipid signatures. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Perez‐Gonzalez R, Gauthier SA, Sharma A, et al. A pleiotropic role for exosomes loaded with the amyloid beta precursor protein carboxyl‐terminal fragments in the brain of Down syndrome patients. Neurobiol Aging 2019;1(84):26–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Danzer KM, Kranich LR, Ruf WP, et al. Exosomal cell‐to‐cell transmission of alpha synuclein oligomers. Mol Neurodegener 2012;24(7):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nonaka T, Masuda‐Suzukake M, Arai T, et al. Prion‐like properties of pathological TDP‐43 aggregates from diseased brains. Cell Rep 2013;4(1):124–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Asai H, Ikezu S, Tsunoda S, et al. Depletion of microglia and inhibition of exosome synthesis halt tau propagation. Nat Neurosci 2015;18(11):1584–1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Feiler MS, Strobel B, Freischmidt A, et al. TDP‐43 is intercellularly transmitted across axon terminals. J Cell Biol 2015;211(4):897–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dinkins MB, Enasko J, Hernandez C, et al. Neutral sphingomyelinase‐2 deficiency ameliorates Alzheimer's disease pathology and improves cognition in the 5XFAD Mouse. J Neurosci 2016;36(33):8653–8667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sardar Sinha M, Ansell‐Schultz A, Civitelli L, et al. Alzheimer's disease pathology propagation by exosomes containing toxic amyloid‐beta oligomers. Acta Neuropathol 2018;136(1):41–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Benussi L, Ciani M, Tonoli E, et al. Loss of exosomes in progranulin‐associated frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2016;40:41–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gauthier SA, Perez‐Gonzalez R, Sharma A, et al. Enhanced exosome secretion in Down syndrome brain ‐ a protective mechanism to alleviate neuronal endosomal abnormalities. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2017;5(1):65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. D'Acunzo P, Hargash T, Pawlik M, et al. Enhanced generation of intraluminal vesicles in neuronal late endosomes in the brain of a Down syndrome mouse model with endosomal dysfunction. Dev Neurobiol 2019;79(7):656–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Perez‐Gonzalez R, Gauthier SA, Kumar A, Levy E. The exosome secretory pathway transports amyloid precursor protein carboxyl‐terminal fragments from the cell into the brain extracellular space. J Biol Chem 2012;287(51):43108–43115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Vella LJ, Scicluna BJ, Cheng L, et al. A rigorous method to enrich for exosomes from brain tissue. J Extracell Vesicles 2017;6(1):1348885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Martens LH, Zhang J, Barmada SJ, et al. Progranulin deficiency promotes neuroinflammation and neuron loss following toxin‐induced injury. J Clin Invest 2012;122(11):3955–3959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Filiano AJ, Martens LH, Young AH, et al. Dissociation of frontotemporal dementia–related deficits and neuroinflammation in progranulin haploinsufficient mice. J Neurosci 2013;33(12):5352–5361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Arrant AE, Onyilo VC, Unger DE, Roberson ED. Progranulin gene therapy improves lysosomal dysfunction and microglial pathology associated with frontotemporal dementia and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. J Neurosc 2018;38(9):2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH, et al. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Baborie A, et al. A harmonized classification system for FTLD‐TDP pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2011;122(1):111–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51(6):1546–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011;2(134):2456–2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gorno‐Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011;76(11):1006–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Thery C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002;74(20):5383–5392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003;75(17):4646–4658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Weatherly DB, Atwood JA 3rd, Minning TA, et al. A Heuristic method for assigning a false‐discovery rate for protein identifications from Mascot database search results. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;4(6):762–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004;76(14):4193–4201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Old WM, Meyer‐Arendt K, Aveline‐Wolf L, et al. Comparison of label‐free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;4(10):1487–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Beissbarth T, Hyde L, Smyth GK, et al. Statistical modeling of sequencing errors in SAGE libraries. Bioinformatics 2004;4(20 Suppl 1):i31–i39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009;4(1):44–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Bio. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ahmed Z, Sheng H, Xu YF, et al. Accelerated lipofuscinosis and ubiquitination in granulin knockout mice suggest a role for progranulin in successful aging. Am J Pathol 2010;177(1):311–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Yin F, Dumont M, Banerjee R, et al. Behavioral deficits and progressive neuropathology in progranulin‐deficient mice: a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. FASEB J 2010;24(12):4639–4647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Wils H, Kleinberger G, Pereson S, et al. Cellular ageing, increased mortality and FTLD‐TDP‐associated neuropathology in progranulin knockout mice. J Pathol 2012;228(1):67–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tanaka Y, Chambers JK, Matsuwaki T, et al. Possible involvement of lysosomal dysfunction in pathological changes of the brain in aged progranulin‐deficient mice. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Arrant AE, Filiano AJ, Unger DE, et al. Restoring neuronal progranulin reverses deficits in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2017;140(5):1447–1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Arrant AE, Nicholson AM, Zhou X, et al. Partial Tmem106b reduction does not correct abnormalities due to progranulin haploinsufficiency. Mol Neurodegener 2018;13(1):32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Gotzl JK, Colombo AV, Fellerer K, et al. Early lysosomal maturation deficits in microglia triggers enhanced lysosomal activity in other brain cells of progranulin knockout mice. Mol Neurodegener 2018;13(1):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Keerthikumar S, Chisanga D, Ariyaratne D, et al. ExoCarta: a web‐based compendium of exosomal cargo. J Mol Biol 2016;428(4):688–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, et al. An RNA‐sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 2014;34(36):11929–11947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gascon E, Lynch K, Ruan H, et al. Alterations in microRNA‐124 and AMPA receptors contribute to social behavioral deficits in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Med 2014;20(12):1444–1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Arrant AE, Roth JR, Boyle NR, et al. Impaired β‐glucocerebrosidase activity and processing in frontotemporal dementia due to progranulin mutations. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019;7(1):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Jian J, Tian QY, Hettinghouse A, et al. Progranulin recruits HSP70 to beta‐glucocerebrosidase and is therapeutic against gaucher disease. EBioMedicine 2016;13:212–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Jian J, Zhao S, Tian QY, et al. Association between progranulin and gaucher disease. EBioMedicine 2016;11:127–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Mackenzie IR, Baker M, Pickering‐Brown S, et al. The neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by mutations in the progranulin gene. Brain 2006;129(Pt 11):3081–3090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Tanaka Y, Matsuwaki T, Yamanouchi K, Nishihara M. Exacerbated inflammatory responses related to activated microglia after traumatic brain injury in progranulin‐deficient mice. Neuroscience 2013;12(231):49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Menzel L, Kleber L, Friedrich C, et al. Progranulin protects against exaggerated axonal injury and astrogliosis following traumatic brain injury. Glia 2017;65(2):278–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bobrie A, Colombo M, Raposo G, Thery C. Exosome secretion: molecular mechanisms and roles in immune responses. Traffic 2011;12(12):1659–1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gupta A, Pulliam L. Exosomes as mediators of neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation 2014;3(11):68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Robbins PD, Dorronsoro A, Booker CN. Regulation of chronic inflammatory and immune processes by extracellular vesicles. J Clin Invest 2016;126(4):1173–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Chen‐Plotkin AS, Unger TL, Gallagher MD, et al. TMEM106B, the risk gene for frontotemporal dementia, is regulated by the microRNA‐132/212 cluster and affects progranulin pathways. J Neurosci 2012;32(33):11213–11227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Schneider R, McKeever P, Kim T, et al. Downregulation of exosomal miR‐204‐5p and miR‐632 as a biomarker for FTD: a GENFI study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89(8):851–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Goetzl EJ, Kapogiannis D, Schwartz JB, et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 2016;30(12):4141–4148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Fiandaca MS, Kapogiannis D, Mapstone M, et al. Identification of preclinical Alzheimer's disease by a profile of pathogenic proteins in neurally derived blood exosomes: A case‐control study. Alzheimers Dement 2015;11(6):600–7.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kapogiannis D, Boxer A, Schwartz JB, et al. Dysfunctionally phosphorylated type 1 insulin receptor substrate in neural‐derived blood exosomes of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 2015;29(2):589–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Goetzl EJ, Boxer A, Schwartz JB, et al. Altered lysosomal proteins in neural‐derived plasma exosomes in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2015;85(1):40–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Goetzl EJ, Mustapic M, Kapogiannis D, et al. Cargo proteins of plasma astrocyte‐derived exosomes in Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J 2016;30(11):3853–3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Goetzl EJ, Schwartz JB, Abner EL, et al. High complement levels in astrocyte‐derived exosomes of Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol 2018;83(3):544–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Faure J, Lachenal G, Court M, et al. Exosomes are released by cultured cortical neurones. Mol Cell Neurosci 2006;31(4):642–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Lachenal G, Pernet‐Gallay K, Chivet M, et al. Release of exosomes from differentiated neurons and its regulation by synaptic glutamatergic activity. Mol Cell Neurosci 2011;46(2):409–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lui H, Zhang J, Makinson SR, et al. Progranulin deficiency promotes circuit‐specific synaptic pruning by microglia via complement activation. Cell 2016;165(4):921–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Henne WM, Buchkovich NJ, Emr SD. The ESCRT pathway. Dev Cell 2011;21(1):77–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Urwin H, Authier A, Nielsen JE, et al. Disruption of endocytic trafficking in frontotemporal dementia with CHMP2B mutations. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19(11):2228–2238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Clayton EL, Mizielinska S, Edgar JR, et al. Frontotemporal dementia caused by CHMP2B mutation is characterised by neuronal lysosomal storage pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2015;130(4):511–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Wang C, Telpoukhovskaia MA, Bahr BA, et al. Endo‐lysosomal dysfunction: a converging mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2018;48:52–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Tkach M, Kowal J, Thery C. Why the need and how to approach the functional diversity of extracellular vesicles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2018;373(1737). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Mathieu M, Martin‐Jaular L, Lavieu G, Thery C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell‐to‐cell communication. Nat Cell Biol 2019;21(1):9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M, et al. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(8):E968–E977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.