Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Dec 11;10:21816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78462-4

Thermal stability of emission from single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots at the telecom O-band

Paweł Holewa 1,#, Marek Grzegorz Mikulicz 1,#, Anna Musiał 1,, Nicole Srocka 2, David Quandt 2, André Strittmatter 2,3, Sven Rodt 2, Stephan Reitzenstein 2, Grzegorz Sęk 1
PMCID: PMC7733461  PMID: 33311592

Abstract

Single-photon sources are key building blocks in most of the emerging secure telecommunication and quantum information processing schemes. Semiconductor quantum dots (QD) have been proven to be the most prospective candidates. However, their practical use in fiber-based quantum communication depends heavily on the possibility of operation in the telecom bands and at temperatures not requiring extensive cryogenic systems. In this paper we present a temperature-dependent study on single QD emission and single-photon emission from metalorganic vapour-phase epitaxy-grown InGaAs/GaAs QDs emitting in the telecom O-band at 1.3 μm. Micro-photoluminescence studies reveal that trapped holes in the vicinity of a QD act as reservoir of carriers that can be exploited to enhance photoluminescence from trion states observed at elevated temperatures up to at least 80 K. The luminescence quenching is mainly related to the promotion of holes to higher states in the valence band and this aspect must be primarily addressed in order to further increase the thermal stability of emission. Photon autocorrelation measurements yield single-photon emission with a purity of g50K(2)0=0.13 up to 50 K. Our results imply that these nanostructures are very promising candidates for single-photon sources at elevated (e.g., Stirling cryocooler compatible) temperatures in the telecom O-band and highlight means for improvements in their performance.

Subject terms: Quantum dots, Single photons and quantum effects, Single photons and quantum effects, Quantum dots, Quantum dots

Introduction

The field of quantum information science would greatly benefit from development of robust, efficient and on-demand single-photon sources (SPSs)1,2. In the past two decades, semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have been investigated in that context in various material systems and have proven to be excellent single-photon emitters35. Epitaxial single In(Ga)As/GaAs QDs emitting below 1 μm have enabled the development of SPSs with record single-photon purity (i.e. with ultra-low probability of multiphoton emission events)6,7, high indistinguishability810, high photon extraction efficiency11 and single-photon flux12. Most of these properties can also be achieved using electrical triggering9,13 which brings the QD solution closer to real-world applications. QDs of this kind also benefit from compatibility with state-of-the-art GaAs-based semiconductor technology which provides mature and hence highly optimized growth, high structural quality, scalability and well developed methods for the fabrication of complex photonic structures (e.g., distributed Bragg reflectors—DBRs or photonic crystal cavities).

An important prerequisite for practical SPSs is compatibility with the existing telecommunication infrastructure based on standard silica fibres to enable low loss long-haul quantum communication in the relevant spectral range of 1.3 μm (O-band with local absorption minimum and vanishing dispersion) and 1.55 μm (C-band with global absorption minimum). One of the approaches is to utilize frequency conversion of near-infrared QD emission to shift it to 1.55 μm14,15. This is currently considered as the nearly optimal QD source and the down-conversion process can erase the small spectral difference between the two remote sources making photons originating from them indistinguishable, but the approach is rather complex and the conversion has still relatively low efficiency. In addition, it requires a laser of a very specific wavelength to be mixed with the QD emission inside a nonlinear medium. Therefore, it is appealing to develop sources directly emitting at the target wavelength. In the case of InAs QDs on GaAs the emission redshift to 1.3 μm is typically achieved via strain engineering and by, e.g., capping with a strain reducing layer (SRL)1621 or the nucleation on metamorphic buffer layers22. QDs with SRL have recently been used for the demonstration of a practical, compact, and fibre-integrated SPS at telecom O-band with working temperature of 40 K23,24. For SPSs emitting at 1.55 μm, the primarily considered candidates are single InAs/InP quantum dashes25,26, InAs/InP QDs2730, and InAs/GaAs QDs based on the metamorphic layer approach31,32. Other approaches for telecom wavelength SPSs, despite their single-photon emission at room temperature, have their own drawbacks, e.g., atomic sources suffer from probabilistic nature of emission events33, random direction of emission and low radiative rates. One has to keep in mind that widely used process of parametric down-conversion34 is also a probabilistic photon generation scheme, which is also under development in the telecom.

The second pivotal requirement for practical, solid-state SPS for quantum communication is single-photon emission at significantly elevated temperatures of the emitter to make such quantum devices more compact, practical and cheaper. Reaching room temperature operation with QDs emitting at telecom wavelengths encounters fundamental limits of the quantum localization energy and inter-level spacing with the highest reported temperatures where the single-photon emission at telecom wavelengths is still observable at 120 K35. This is out of reach for thermoelectrical cooling, but on the contrary, the Stirling cryocooling can be successfully applied to reach temperatures as low as 27 K23,24 and fulfils the requirements for compact, easy and relatively cheap operation without need for cryogenic liquids.

Studying the influence of temperature on the stability and purity of single-photon emission from QDs enables the determination of the highest working temperature for a given SPS design and the identification of processes responsible for quenching of QD emission and deterioration of single-photon purity. For single InGaAs/GaAs QDs with SRL emitting at 1.3 μm so far only Olbrich et al. carried out a temperature-dependent study36. They reported single-photon emission at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) with second order correlation function at zero time delay g(2)0=0.21 using the negative trion radiative recombination36. The structures investigated in this paper differ fundamentally from those investigated in Ref. 36: In our case the emission is dominated by positively charged complexes due to unintentional carbon p-doping in the metalorganic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) process37 in contrast to negative trions exploited in the case of previous study. Additionally, differences between the two groups of nanostructures in QD morphology resulting from details of the growth procedure (i. e., exact growth parameters) are reflected in a modified electronic level structure and s–p energy splitting38. Moreover, in the present work the QDs are embedded in deterministically fabricated mesas which makes them relevant for high-yield single-photon sources and is crucial in view of their practical applications.

We present a detailed temperature dependent study of micro-photoluminescence (µPL) and single-photon emission to explore the physics of InGaAs/GaAs QDs grown by MOCVD with SRL and emitting at 1.3 µm. We identify excitonic complexes based on power-dependent and polarization-resolved µPL measurements und study them further by means of temperature-dependent µPL which allows us to identify the main µPL quenching mechanism in the investigated nanostructures. Furthermore, we probed single-photon emission with photon autocorrelation measurements in the temperature range of (5–50) K. The experimental findings allow us to point out the dominating factors limiting single-photon emission purity at elevated temperatures.

Results

Identification of excitonic complexes

In order to investigate in detail the temperature stability of emission and the impact of elevated temperatures on the single-photon purity from a single QD, excitonic complexes were first identified by means of excitation power-dependent and polarization-resolved µPL measurements. Owing to relatively small mesa size (disk shaped) of 1.3 µm and the QD spatial density of a few times 109/cm2 it was possible to spectrally isolate individual emission lines of high intensity and low background signal from a single QD at 5 K (see Fig. 1a). Data from the same exemplary QD are presented throughout the manuscript. Different excitonic complexes, namely very prominent positive (X+) trion, exciton (X), and for this particular QD also negative (X) trion as well as biexciton (XX) were pre-identified by means of excitation power-dependent µPL (Fig. 1b). The observed line pattern is rather typical for this type of QDs37. We obtained linear scaling factors of emission intensity for exciton (IXP1.08(5)), superlinear for trions (IX+P1.17(8) and IX-P1.50(14)) and quadratic for biexciton (IXXP1.95(22)), as expected39,40. Figure 1c presents polarization-resolved µPL spectra, where we observed the fine structure splitting (FSS) of the neutral exciton. We determined FSS of ΔFSS=67μeV for this QD by fitting the polarization dependence of the emission energy with sine function (see Fig. 1c—right panel). The extracted ΔFSS value is within the range of FSSs typically observed for these QDs37,41.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

μPL spectra from the investigated InGaAs/GaAs QD embedded in a mesa of 1.3 μm diameter at 5 K. X—exciton, X+—positive trion, X—negative trion, XX—biexciton. (a) Spectra for different excitation powers in the range of (0.05–10) μW. (b) Double logarithmic plot of the µPL intensity as a function of excitation power. Symbols denote the measured data points, the solid lines represent I ∝ Pα dependence with a near quadratic (1.95) and linear (1.08) behavior for biexciton and exciton, respectively. Positive and negative trions exhibit superlinear dependence (1.17 and 1.50, respectively). (c) Polarization-resolved µPL spectra for perpendicular polarization angles for X in the left panel and polarization dependence of emission energy for X and XX in the right panel, both indicating exciton fine structure splitting of ΔFSS=67μeV.

The trion complexes were identified based on the absence of FSS in polarization-resolved measurements supported by their superlinear PL intensity power dependence. Noteworthy, a distinction between positively and negatively charged excitonic complexes was possible by comparing the emission spectrum with the results of 8-band k.p calculations of the QD’s electronic structure combined with the configuration interaction method for excitonic states due to their significantly different binding energies37. Theoretical modelling (not shown here) reveals that these energies depend on exciton emission energy and for the reported QD, X and XX should be confined much stronger (ΔEX-ΔEXX4 meV) than X+ (ΔEX+1 meV).

Temperature stability

To study the temperature stability of the QDs and to pinpoint the main carriers’ escape channel from these QDs we performed μPL studies in the range of temperatures from 5 to 80 K. The corresponding µPL spectra of the QD under study are presented in Fig. 2a. Although the X+ intensity was slightly lower than the X intensity at 5 K, it turned out to dominate the spectrum in the intermediate temperature range of 20 to 75 K. In fact, a pronounced X+ µPL intensity increase was detected towards 30 K and the emission was still visible even above the liquid nitrogen temperature of 80 K. At this temperature the X+ µPL intensity was reduced by a factor of 7 in comparison to its maximal value at 30 K.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Temperature-driven evolution of μPL spectra from 5 to 80 K for 12Psat (a) and Psat (b). Analysis of μPL temperature dependence for QD excitonic complexes: (c) µPL intensity (d) µPL linewidth. Symbols denote measured data, colored lines represent fits to the experimental data.

A detailed quantitative analysis of the temperature dependence of emission from a studied QD is presented in Fig. 2c. With increasing temperature, a redshift of all lines can be observed (see Fig. 2a,b) following the renormalisation of the QD material band gap energy (Eg). One can model the temperature dependence of energy gap taking into account temperature-dependent bosonic distribution of phonons by42:

Eg(T)=Eg(0)-Sωcothω2kBT-1

with Eg0 the energy band gap at 0 K, S the electron–phonon coupling constant, ω the average phonon energy, kB the Boltzmann constant, and T the temperature. Fitting the experimental data with the formula above allows to extract mean phonon energy of  ω = (8.0 ± 1.2) meV which corresponds well to the GaAs transversal acoustic phonons43 confirming the predominant coupling of QD excitons with bulk phonons of the matrix material.

The data for the temperature dependence of linewidth γ = γ(T) (Fig. 2d) were fitted using a model including the linear contribution of acoustic phonons and exponential thermal activation of optical phonons with energy of ELO, coupled to the exctionic complex44:

γT=γ0+γacT+γLOexpELO/kBT-1.

A fit to the temperature-induced linewidth broadening reveals at T = 0 K line broadenings of approximately γ0 = 80 μeV for X+, X, XX and γ0 = 140 μeV for X. Here the difference in linewidths at low temperatures could be a result of stronger spectral diffusion (dynamical broadening due to charge fluctuations in the QD environment including defects in the SRL and charged surface states) caused by more pronounced Stark shift due to higher polarizability of the X state than the other excitonic complexes45,46.

The strong increase of linewidth setting in at about 40 K can be explained by the larger contribution of phonon sidebands to the total emission in this temperature range. Therefore, the determined full width at half maximum (FWHM) corresponds rather to the width of the phonon sidebands than to broadening of the zero-phonon line (ZPL)47. We found that the linewidths of the ZPL for all excitonic complexes are dominated by spectral diffusion: broadenings at the lowest investigated temperature are significantly greater than spectral resolution of our setup (< 25 μeV) and much larger than the lifetime-limited homogenous linewidth (0.7 μeV). We attribute the enhanced spectral diffusion to charged states at etched mesa surfaces. This interpretation is supported by the fact that even broader lines of (155 ± 50) µeV were observed in QDs embedded in smaller mesas with diameters of 0.3 µm. The higher optical quality of QDs in large mesas originates from the fact that in this case the probability that the QD is far away from the mesa sidewalls is higher and the influence of fluctuating charges trapped due to roughness of the etched mesa surface are a primary cause of spectral diffusion48. Increasing FWHM of emission is the reason for spectral lines to spectrally overlap and in consequence for the degradation of single-photon emission purity.

The changes of emission intensity shown in Fig. 2a–c are characteristic for the investigated type of QDs, similar results were obtained for other QDs in the same structure. To explain the µPL quenching (Fig. 2c), we compare our findings with recently reported results of 8-band k.p calculations for such dots which yielded the s–p splitting of (60–80) meV38. Here, the lower splitting corresponds to the higher QD emission energy. Noteworthy, the QDs analyzed here have even higher emission energies than those studied previously in Ref.38. Additionally, 8-band k.p calculations predict s–p splitting to be shared by approximately (20–30) meV for holes and (40–50) meV for electrons. Analyzing the µPL temperature dependence we found characteristic activation energies responsible for quenching of individual emission lines to be in the range of (10–20) meV. This allows us to conclude that the dominant mechanism for the µPL quenching process is the promotion of holes to excited valence band states (confined levels) in the QD and subsequently their increasing thermal escape probability. The temperature-dependent data for X and XX are well explained by Arrhenius dependence with a single activation energy. In contrast, for charged complexes a modification of the standard fitting formula was needed to account for the µPL intensity increase (decrease) in the low temperature range for X+ (X). As discussed in Ref. 36, this charging temperature effect can be related to thermal activation of one type of carriers from a reservoir, resulting in selective amplification (reduction) of X+ (X) emission at elevated temperatures (see Fig. 2c). The temperature dependence of µPL intensity I(T) can be described by 36:

IT=I0+IP1-1-11+B1exp-E1/kBT1+B2exp-E2/kBT,

where I0, IP are initial and reservoir-gained intensities, E1, E2 are activation energies of processes responsible for increase, decrease of emission intensity, respectively, and B1, B2 are the amplitudes of thermally-activated processes with energies E1 and E2. In the case of charged complexes, a distinct temperature interplay of their relative intensities was observed in the low temperature range: the activation energy E1 ≅ 1.9 meV was assigned to the pronounced μPL intensity increase of X+ at temperatures up to 30 K. This energy is characteristic also for X µPL intensity reduction indicating thermal activation of positive carrier traps (i.e. holes present due to unintentional carbon p-doping in MOCVD growth) in the vicinity of the QDs, resulting in higher probability of X+ formation. We could not observe clear correlations between the obtained activation energies for μPL thermal quenching (E2) and the associated type of excitonic complex for the investigated QDs. This further indicates that the thermal intensity behavior is rather related to the s–p splitting and not to the QD size and specific type of excitonic complex. Then, the promotion of holes to higher QD states is the main path for thermal quenching of µPL intensity driven by the small interlevel spacing of the valence band confined states.

The temperature-dependent µPL study was carried out for two excitation regimes: at the exciton saturation power (Psat = 3.0 µW) and at a half of the saturation power (0.5 Psat). The corresponding results are shown in Fig. 2a–d. A qualitative difference for both excitation powers can only be observed in the case of the positively charged trion. Here, the activation energy of E1 ≅ 1.9 meV is visible only for the excitation power below saturation, for which the thermally activated carriers can still supply QDs and thus cause the X+ µPL increase, and simultaneously the X µPL decrease. At Psat, the trion µPL emission rate is limited by its radiative lifetime and even excess availability of thermally activated carriers cannot further increase the emission intensity. The observed relative increase in the intensity of X+ with respect to X can be related to increased probability of the QD being charged with residual carrier before the optical excitation.

Single-photon emission

Single-photon emission was probed by measuring the second-order photon autocorrelation function g(2)(τ) and fitting the normalized histograms of coincidences with49:

g(2)τ=1-1-g20×e-τtrise,

where the function value for τ = 0 [g(2)(0)] reflects the multiphoton emission probability, the antibunching time constant is trise=1Γ+Wp, with the electron–hole radiative recombination rate Γ and the effective pump rate Wp.

Experimental histograms are plotted together with the corresponding μPL spectra in Fig. 3a–c. While Γ (530 MHz for X+, based on the time-resolved µPL experiment) is known to stay approximately constant with temperature36, the observed decrease of trise reflects the increase of the effective pump rate with temperature: the laser excitation power was increased with temperature to counteract the thermal quenching of µPL intensity. Moreover, Wp increases also due to additional carriers, thermally activated from the reservoir (as discussed above for X+). The values of multiphoton events’ suppression and rise times obtained from fitting to the histograms of coincidences in Fig. 3a–c right panels are: (a) g(2)(0) = 0, trise = 1.9 ns, (b) g(2)(0) = 0.17, trise = 1.0 ns, and (c) g(2)(0) = 0.13, trise = 0.64 ns with standard errors of fitted g(2)(0) values of 0.073, 0.11, 0.21, respectively. Here, the degradation of multiphoton suppression for elevated temperatures reflects the increasing contribution of uncorrelated background emission as seen in the associated µPL spectra due to temperature-induced quenching of QD emission. This contribution can be estimated by the ratio ρ=S/(S+B) 50 with intensity of signal S and background B, which decreases from ρ=0.87 at 5 K to ρ=0.57 at 50 K. For all measurements the spectral filtering was kept constant and its bandwidth (0.43 nm) was in all cases broader than the FWHM of the X+ emission line yielding 0.26 nm, 0.27 nm, and 0.40 nm for 5 K, 25 K, and 50 K, respectively. Therefore the low degradation of the g(2)(0) value is not achieved artificially by narrowing the spectral filtering, but is an inherent property of investigated structures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single-photon emission from the X+ at cryogenic and elevated temperatures: spectra registered on superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors—SNSPDs (left panel) and corresponding autocorrelation histograms (right panel), measured under continuous wave non-resonant excitation at (a) T = 5 K, (b) T = 25 K, and (c) T = 50 K.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we performed a detailed temperature- and power-dependent study of photoluminescence from single MOCVD-grown InGaAs/GaAs QDs, emitting in the telecom O-band at 1.3 μm, and embedded in deterministically fabricated mesas. Our studies provide important information about the temperature stability of single QD emission and assist at better understanding of processes involved in the temperature-induced degradation of single-photon emission purity. These processes include the increase of uncorrelated background photons and simultaneous decrease of the line intensity. Excitonic complexes in the QD were identified based on polarization-resolved and excitation-power-dependent µPL. The positive trion was found to be the thermally most stable excitonic complex, with its emission still visible at the temperature up to at least 80 K (liquid nitrogen accessible), and with single-photon emission purity of g(2)(0) = 0.13 at 50 K, what is particularly important in view of future applications due to applicability of cryogen-free cooling23,24. The positive trion emission intensity has a maximum around 30 K which is actually an ideal temperature when building a practical single-photon sources exploiting the Stirling cryocooling.

Our analysis indicates that the reason for non-monotonic temperature-dependence of the charged states is the thermal activation of holes from their traps in the QD vicinity. Moreover, we identified the excitation of holes to higher QD states in the valence band as the dominating mechanism for the µPL thermal quenching in the investigated range of temperatures. Both carrier loss and uncorrelated background photons at the same wavelength as the emitting line deteriorate the purity of single-photon generation from the studied QDs. While the uncorrelated background photons are a dominant process in multiphoton suppression degradation and could be limited by quasi-resonant51,52 or resonant53 excitation schemes, the reason for carrier loss, namely the holes’ level separation which is responsible for the µPL quenching, would have to be tailored in the QD epitaxial growth (e. g., by including Al-containing barriers close to the QD/SRL to reduce thermal escape of carriers), in order to increase the thermal stability of the emission.

Methods

Fabrication process

The investigated sample was grown by MOCVD on GaAs (001) substrate and consists of a 300 nm GaAs buffer layer, a distributed Bragg reflector composed of 23 pairs of GaAs/Al0.9Ga0.1As layers and a single layer of self-assembled In0.75Ga0.25As QDs grown in Stranski–Krastanow mode. Before the final 634 nm GaAs capping layer, a nominally 4 nm thick In0.2Ga0.8As SRL was deposited following the growth of QDs in order to redshift the emission down to 1.3 µm17. Mesas were deterministically fabricated by means of in-situ 3D electron-beam lithography54,55: first a bright QD was spectrally and spatially identified by means of low-temperature cathodoluminescence by applying electron dose low enough not to invert the CSAR62 resist spin-coated on the sample surface beforehand, and directly afterwards a cylindrical mesa coinciding in position with the pre-selected QD was defined in the resist by electron beam lithography. The sample was further dry etched using plasma reactive ion etching and the designed pattern was transferred from the resist to the GaAs capping layer. Mesas were fabricated with diameters in the range of 0.25 µm to 2.1 µm. All results presented in this manuscript were obtained for a QD in a mesa of 1.3 µm diameter.

Experimental setup

During spectroscopic measurements the structure was kept in the continuous-flow liquid-helium cryostat. Identification of excitonic complexes and temperature-dependent measurements were performed in a µPL setup equipped with a microscope objective with NA = 0.4, 1 m focal-length single-grating monochromator and InGaAs multichannel array detector (pixel size: 25 μm), providing spatial and spectral resolution of 2 µm and on the order of 25 μeV, respectively. Photon statistics measurements were conducted using a Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup configuration56 with a monochromator of 0.32 m focal length acting as a band-pass filter with 0.43 nm bandwidth (kept constant for measurements at all temperatures). The filtered signal was coupled to a 50:50 fiber beam splitter. Each of its outputs was connected to NbN superconducting single photon counting detector with 10-15% quantum efficiency and 10 dark counts/s at 1.3 µm. The photon correlation statistics was acquired by a multichannel picosecond event timer with time-bin width set to 256 ps. In both types of experiments the QD was excited non-resonantly by a continuous wave semiconductor diode laser with energy of 1.88 eV (λ = 660 nm) and 1.56 eV (λ = 787 nm) for the temperature-dependent µPL and autocorrelation measurements, respectively.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support via the “Quantum dot-based indistinguishable and entangled photon sources at telecom wavelengths” project, carried out within the HOMING programme of the Foundation for Polish Science co-financed by the EU under the ERDF. Support from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange is also acknowledged. This work was also supported by the FI-SEQUR project jointly financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union in the framework of the programme to promote research, innovation, and technologies (Pro FIT) in Germany, and the National Centre for Research and Development in Poland within the 2nd Poland-Berlin Photonics Programme, Grant Number 2/POLBER-2/2016 (project value 2 089 498 PLN). Support from the German Science Foundation via CRC 787 is also acknowledged.

Author contributions

P.H. and A.M. performed autocorrelation measurements. P.H. and M.G.M., supervised by A.M., performed micro-photoluminescence measurements and wrote the first version of the manuscript. D.Q. designed and grew the sample under supervision of A.S.; N.S. patterned the sample under supervision of S.R. S.R. and G.S. supervised the work of the Berlin and Wroclaw teams, respectively. All authors took part in the preparation of the final version of the paper. P.H. and M.G.M. contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Paweł Holewa and Marek Grzegorz Mikulicz.

References

  • 1.Michler, P. Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies (Springer, Berlin, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kneissl, M., Knorr, A., Reitzenstein, S. & Hoffmann, A. Semiconductor Nanophotonics (Springer, Berlin, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao, X., Zopf, M. & Ding, F. Telecom wavelength single photon sources. J. Semicond.40, 071901 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arakawa, Y. & Holmes, M. J. Progress in quantum-dot single photon sources for quantum information technologies: a broad spectrum overview. Appl. Phys. Rev.7, 021309 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huber, D., Reindl, M., Aberl, J., Rastelli, A. & Trotta, R. Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a review. J. Opt.20, 073002 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ding, X. et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 020401 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schweickert, L. et al. On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source. Appl. Phys. Lett.112, 093106 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Müller, M., Bounouar, S., Jöns, K. D., Glässl, M. & Michler, P. On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs. Nat. Photonics8, 224–228 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Somaschi, N. et al. Near optimal single photon sources in the solid state. Nat. Photonics10, 340–345 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang, H. et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 213601 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Unsleber, S. et al. Highly indistinguishable on-demand resonance fluorescence photons from a deterministic quantum dot micropillar device with 74% extraction efficiency. Opt. Express24, 8539–8546 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen, Y., Zopf, M., Keil, R., Ding, F. & Schmidt, O. G. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat. Commun.9, 2994 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heindel, T. et al. Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency. Appl. Phys. Lett.96, 011107 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weber, J. H. et al. Two-photon interference in the telecom C-band after frequency conversion of photons from remote quantum emitters. Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 23–26 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Greve, K. et al. Quantum-dot spin–photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelength. Nature491, 421–425 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ustinov, V. M. et al. InAs/InGaAs quantum dot structures on GaAs substrates emitting at 1.3 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett.74, 2815–2817 (1999).
  • 17.Guffarth, F. et al. Strain engineering of self-organized InAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B64, 085305 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tatebayashi, J., Nishioka, M. & Arakawa, Y. Over 1.5 μm light emission from InAs quantum dots embedded in InGaAs strain-reducing layer grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett.78, 3469–3471 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alloing, B. et al. Growth and characterization of single quantum dots emitting at 1300 nm. Appl. Phys. Lett.86, 101908 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sęk, G. et al. Wetting layer states of InAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dot structures: effect of intermixing and capping layer. J. Appl. Phys.101, 063539 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul, M. et al. Metal-organic vapor-phase epitaxy-grown ultra-low density InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots exhibiting cascaded single-photon emission at 1.3 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett.106, 122105 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seravalli, L. et al. Sub-critical InAs layers on metamorphic InGaAs for single quantum dot emission at telecom wavelengths. Cryst. Res. Technol.49, 540–545 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Musiał, A. et al. Plug&play fiber-coupled 73 kHz single-photon source operating in the telecom O-band. Adv. Quantum Technol.3, 2000018 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schlehahn, A. et al. Operating single quantum emitters with a compact stirling cryocooler. Rev. Sci. Instrum.86, 013113 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dusanowski, Ł. et al. Single photon emission at 1.55 μm from charged and neutral exciton confined in a single quantum dash. Appl. Phys. Lett.105, 021909 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dusanowski, Ł. et al. Single-photon emission of InAs/InP quantum dashes at 1.55 μm and temperatures up to 80 K. Appl. Phys. Lett.108, 163108 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miyazawa, T. et al. Single-photon emission at 1.5 μm from an InAs/InP quantum dot with highly suppressed multi-photon emission probabilities. Appl. Phys. Lett.109, 132106 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Musiał, A. et al. High-purity triggered single-photon emission from symmetric single InAs/InP quantum dots around the telecom C-band window. Adv. Quantum Technol.3, 1900082 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ha, N. et al. Single photon emission from droplet epitaxial quantum dots in the standard telecom window around a wavelength of 1.55 μm. Appl. Phys. Express13, 025002 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anderson, M. et al. Quantum teleportation using highly coherent emission from telecom C-band quantum dots. npj Quantum Inf.6, 14 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Semenova, E. S. et al. Metamorphic approach to single quantum dot emission at 1.55 μm on GaAs substrate. J. Appl. Phys.103, 103533 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Portalupi, S. L., Jetter, M. & Michler, P. InAs quantum dots grown on metamorphic buffers as non-classical light sources at telecom C-band: a review. Semicond. Sci. Technol.34, 053001 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Willis, R. T., Becerra, F. E., Orozco, L. A. & Rolston, S. L. Photon statistics and polarization correlations at telecommunications wavelengths from a warm atomic ensemble. Opt. Express19, 14632 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bock, M., Lenhard, A., Chunnilall, C. & Becher, C. Highly efficient heralded single-photon source for telecom wavelengths based on a PPLN waveguide. Opt. Express24, 23992 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xue, Y. et al. 1.3 μm single-photon emission from strain-coupled bilayer of InAs/GaAs quantum dots at the temperature up to 120 K. Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 182102 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Olbrich, F. et al. Temperature-dependent properties of single long-wavelength InGaAs quantum dots embedded in a strain reducing layer. J. Appl. Phys.121, 184302 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mrowiński, P. et al. Excitonic complexes in MOCVD-grown InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths. Phys. Rev. B100, 115310 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Podemski, P. et al. Interplay between emission wavelength and s-p splitting in MOCVD-grown InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots emitting above 1.3 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 023102 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Abbarchi, M. et al. Poissonian statistics of excitonic complexes in quantum dots. J. Appl. Phys.106, 053504 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baier, M. H., Malko, A., Pelucchi, E., Oberli, D. Y. & Kapon, E. Quantum-dot exciton dynamics probed by photon-correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B73, 205321 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kettler, J. et al. Neutral and charged biexciton-exciton cascade in near-telecom-wavelength quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B94, 045303 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.O’Donnell, K. P. & Chen, X. Temperature dependence of semiconductor band gaps. Appl. Phys. Lett.58, 2924–2926 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ortner, G. et al. Temperature dependence of the excitonic band gap in InxGa1−xAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B72, 085328 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ouerghui, W., Melliti, A., Maaref, M. A. & Bloch, J. Dependence on temperature of homogeneous broadening of InGaAs/InAs/GaAs quantum dot fundamental transitions. Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct.28, 519–524 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Abbarchi, M. et al. Spectral diffusion and line broadening in single self-assembled GaAs∕AlGaAs quantum dot photoluminescence. Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 162101 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mar, J. D., Baumberg, J. J., Xu, X. L., Irvine, A. C. & Williams, D. A. Precise measurements of the dipole moment and polarizability of the neutral exciton and positive trion in a single quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B95, 201304 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dusanowski, Ł. et al. Phonon-assisted radiative recombination of excitons confined in strongly anisotropic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B90, 125424 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ortner, G. et al. Temperature dependence of the zero-phonon linewidth in InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B70, 201301 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Michler, P. et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature406, 968–970 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Brouri, R., Beveratos, A., Poizat, J.-P. & Grangier, P. Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond. Opt. Lett.25, 1294–1296 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Malko, A. et al. Optimization of the efficiency of single-photon sources based on quantum dots under optical excitation. Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 081905 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dusanowski, Ł. et al. Triggered high-purity telecom-wavelength single-photon generation from p-shell-driven InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot. Opt. Express25, 31122 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huber, T., Predojević, A., Föger, D., Solomon, G. & Weihs, G. Optimal excitation conditions for indistinguishable photons from quantum dots. New J. Phys.17, 123025 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Srocka, N. et al. Enhanced photon-extraction efficiency from InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots in deterministic photonic structures at 1.3 μm fabricated by in-situ electron-beam lithography. AIP Adv.8, 085205 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gschrey, M. et al. Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nat. Commun.6, 7662 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hanbury Brown, R. & Twiss, R. Q. Correlations between photons in two coherent beams of light. Nature177, 27–32 (1956). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES