Abstract
Recent reports have shown the importance of IFN-γ and T-bet+ B cells in the pathology of SLE, suggesting the involvement of IFN-γ-producing T-bet+ CD4+ cells, i.e., Th1 cells. This study determined the changes in Th1 subsets with metabolic shift and their potential as therapeutic targets in SLE. Compared with healthy donors, patients with SLE had higher numbers of T-bethiCXCR3lo effector cells and T-bet+Foxp3lo non-suppressive cells, which excessively produce IFN-γ, and lower number of non-IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3hi activated-Treg cells. These changes were considered to be involved in treatment resistance. The differentiation mechanism of Th1 subsets was investigated in vitro using memory CD4+ cells obtained from healthy donors and patients with SLE. In memory CD4+ cells of healthy donors, both rapamycin and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) suppressed T-bet+Foxp3- cells, and induced T-bet+Foxp3+(lo/hi) cells. Rapamycin induced IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3lo cells accompanied with enhanced lipid metabolism, whereas 2DG induced IFN-γ-non-producing T-bet+Foxp3hi cells. In memory CD4+ cells of SLE patients, inhibition of fatty acid synthesis, but not β-oxidation, suppressed IFN-γ production, and up-regulated of Foxp3 expression in T-bet+Foxp3+ cells. Metabolic regulators such as fatty acid synthesis inhibitors may improve the pathological status by correcting Th1 subset imbalance and overproduction of IFN-γ in SLE.
Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus, T-bet, IFN-γ, fatty acid synthesis, immunometabolism
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common autoimmune disease. That nonspecific treatment of steroids or immunosuppressants is still used as the main therapeutic modality stresses the need to explore the pathological mechanisms and design new therapeutic strategies for SLE.
IFN signature plays an important role in SLE (1). In recent years, modular transcriptional repertoire analysis has demonstrated a different type I/II IFN signature and the importance of not only type I IFN but also type II IFN (IFN-γ) (2). While helper T (Th) cells are known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of SLE, their differentiation and functional abnormalities remain unclear (3).
In the 1990–2010, SLE pathology was discussed in the context of a balance between Th1 and Th2, together with the involvement of Th1 (4, 5). However, Th1 is only defined as an IFN-γ-producing cell, and other important markers for Th1 such as CXCR3 and T-bet, have not been simultaneously examined in these papers. Recently, the diversity of Th cells has been reported, and CXCR3, T-bet and IFN-γ have been reported to be expressed not only in Th1 but also in other diverse Th subsets. In particular, it was reported that T peripheral helper (TPH) cells and Th10 cells, which attract much attention and are important for B cell help, produced IFN-γ and expressed CXCR3 and T-bet (6, 7). Recent studies have emphasized the roles of T-bet+ B cells in SLE pathology, such as the production of autoantibodies and renal involvement (8–11). TPH cells and Th10 cells were known to be correlated with T-bet+ B cells in SLE (6, 12).
T-bet is known as a master transcription factor that regulates Th1 differentiation, and it was reported previously that T-bet plays a positive role in the regulation of IFN-γ production by effector Th1 cells (13, 14). Interestingly, various new functions of T-bet as a transcription factor have been recognized in recent years, including the presence of T-bet+Foxp3+ Treg, which specifically inhibits Th1 in mice (15) and inhibition of aberrant autocrine type I IFN and its downstream signaling in Th1 (16). However, the role of T-bet-expressing CD4+ cells, i.e., Th1 subsets, in SLE pathology remains unknown.
During the process of tissue infection, lymphocytes, including Th cells, rapidly change into the effector phase upon antigen stimulation. These activities require massive energy and rapid synthesis of biological components using amino acids, lipids, and nucleic acids (17). Recent studies in rodents have demonstrated enhanced glycolysis under aerobic conditions associated with such anabolic processes in the activation of various immunocytes (18–21). The differentiation regulation mechanism through immunometabolism involved in Th cell differentiation is being clarified in many studies mainly in mice; however, it is largely unknown in human, particularly in the pathology of autoimmune diseases, such as SLE.
The aim of this study was to shed light on the pathogenic process of SLE. Specifically, we determined the changes in Th1 subsets in SLE patients and the roles of these cells in the differentiation regulation mechanism via immunometabolism.
Materials and Methods
Cell Isolation and Differentiation
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from healthy adults using lymphocyte separation medium (Lympholyte-H; Cedarlane, Burlington, NC), and CD4+ T cells were purified by negative selection using CD4 T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and magnetic separation (Miltenyi Biotec) for negative selection CD45RA- memory T cells were further purified by negative selection using MACS Naive CD4+ T cell isolation kit; (Miltenyi Biotec). We confirmed that the purity of the obtained CD45RA- memory CD4+ T cells was higher than 90%, as determined by flow cytometric analysis. CD45RA- memory CD4+ T cells were activated by plate-bound anti-CD3 (2 μg/ml; eBioscience) and anti-CD28 (0.5 μg/ml; eBioscience) with anti-IFNGR Abs (10 μg/ml; R&D Systems, Inc.), tofacitinib (JAK inhibitor) (300 nM, kindly provided by Pfizer), rapamycin (mTORC1 inhibitor) (10 nM, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX), or 2-DG (3 mM, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), C75 (racemic) (10 μM: Santa Cruz Biotechonology), Etomoxir (10 μM, 50 μM: Sigma Aldrich) cultured for 3 days in RPMI-1640 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) supplemented with 10% FCS (Tissue Culture Biologicals, Tulare, CA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 U/ml streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA).
Patients
PBMCs were obtained from patients with SLE and healthy subjects. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
SLE (n = 60) | HD (n = 31) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 41.4 ± 13.6 | 44.0 ± 19.3 | 0.8735 |
Gender | M:F 5:55 | M:F 5:26 | 0.1366 |
Disease duration, months | 142.3 ± 123.6 | ||
Corticosteroid use | 40/60 | ||
SLEDAI score | 11.5 ± 9.0 | ||
BILAG score | 12.9 ± 11.0 | ||
BILAG A1 and/or B2 | 36/60 | ||
clinical relevant organ involvement (BILAG A or B) | |||
constitutional | 24/60 (40.0%) | ||
mucocutaneous | 26/60 (43.3%) | ||
central nervous system | 14/60 (23.3%) | ||
acute confusional state | 4 | ||
cerebrovascular disease | 4 | ||
seizure disorders | 2 | ||
headache | 2 | ||
mood disorder | 2 | ||
cognitive dysfunction | 1 | ||
aseptic meningitis | 1 | ||
neuropathy, cranial | 1 | ||
musculoskeletal | 10/60 (16.7%) | ||
cardiovascular/respiratory | 2/60 (3.3%) | ||
abdominal | 4/60 (6.7%) | ||
renal | 20/60 (33.3%) | ||
ophthalmic | 0/60 (0%) | ||
haematological | 20/60 (33.3%) | ||
anti-dsDNA Abs (IU/ml) | 76.6 ± 124.9 (55.0%) | ||
anti-Sm Abs (U/ml) | 40.4 ± 137.2 (10.9%) | ||
IgG (mg/dl) | 1,798 ± 606 | ||
CH50 (U/ml) | 38.2 ± 17.2 | ||
CRP (mg/dl) | 0.8 ± 1.9 | ||
ESR (mm/h) | 47.2 ± 29.8 | ||
WBC (/µl) | 4,727 ± 2,040 | ||
Lymph (/µl) | 968 ± 668 | ||
history of treatment | |||
Immunosuppressants | 1.5 ± 1.6 | ||
IVCY | 20 | ||
AZ | 17 | ||
TAC | 19 | ||
CsA | 11 | ||
MTX | 8 | ||
MZ | 10 | ||
RTX | 1 | ||
HCQ | 7 | ||
ABT | 3 | ||
MMF | 1 | ||
High-dose corticosteroid (times) | 0.8 ± 0.8 | ||
Steroid pulse (times) | 0.5 ± 1.3 |
Data are mean ± SD or number of patients.
See Table 1 for abbreviations. IVCY, intravenous cyclophosphamide; AZ, azathioprine; TAC, tacrolimus; CsA, cyclosporin; MTX, methotrexate; MZR, mizoribine; RTX, rituximab; HCG, Hydroxychloroquine; ABT, abatacept; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil. High-dose corticosteroids were defined as the equivalent of prednisolone ≥0.8 mg/kg/day. Low-dose corticosteroids were defined as the equivalent of prednisolone ≤10 mg/day.
Flow Cytometry
After washing the cells (PBMCs or CD4+CD45RA- T cells), they were suspended in 100 ml of FACS solution (0.5% human albumin and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS) and stained with the following antibodies: V500-conjugated anti-CD4 Abs (#560769), PerCP-Cy™5.5-conjugated anti-CD25 Abs (#560503), FITC-conjugated anti-CD28 Abs (#555728), PerCP-Cy™5.5-conjugated anti-CXCR3 Abs (#580832), FITC-conjugated anti-CD38 Abs (#555459), and V500-conjugated anti-HLA-DR Abs (#561224) (all from BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for 30 min at 4°C. For intracellular staining of T-bet (V450)-conjugated labeled, #561312, BD PharMingen), Foxp3 (Alexa Fluor 488)-conjugated labeled, #560047, BD PharMingen), mTOR (pS2448) (#O21-404) (PE)-conjugated labeled, #563489, BD PharMingen), IFN-γ (APC)-conjugated labeled, #554702, BD PharMingen), PBMCs were fixed and permeabilized with Perm Buffer III (BD Phosflow™) or Transcription Factor Buffer Set (BD Biosciences) before intracellular staining, then analyzed on FACSVerse (BD Biosciences). Isotype-matched mouse IgG controls (BD, Phosflow) were used to evaluate the background. Finally, the cells were washed three times with FACS solution and analyzed with a FACSVerse (BD, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo software (Tomy Digital Biology, Tokyo). For IFN-γ staining, PBMCs were incubated with PMA (50 nG/ml, 1544-5, Wako), ionomycin (1 μg/ml, 10634, SIGMA-Aldrich, MO) and breferdin (2.5 μg/ml, B7651, SIGMA-Aldrich) for 1 h at 37°C.
Lactate Assay
CD45RA- memory CD4+ T cells were cultured alone or under stimulation/treatment for 3 days in 96-well plates. The culture medium was later collected and diluted properly for measurement of lactate concentration using Lactate Assay Kit II (BioVision, Milpitas, CA), and the protocol supplied by the manufacturer.
Cytokine Production
IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-17 levels in the culture media were determined by the BD Cytometric Bead Array human Flex set, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (BD PharMingen).
Intracellular ROS Levels
After 3-day culture, CD45RA- memory CD4+ T cells were gently washed twice with 37°C PBS, then incubated with 100 μl of 1X DCFH-DA medium solution at 37°C for 60 min. They were repeatedly washed thereafter with PBS at 37°C, then cultured for 5 min in wells each containing 100 μl of culture medium with 100 μl of 2X Cell Lysis Buffer. Finally, 150 μl of the culture mixture was transferred to a 96-well plate black culture fluorometric plates. Fluorescence was read with a fluorometric plate reader at 480/530 nm.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was prepared by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized, and quantitative real-time PCR was performed in the Step One Plus instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in triplicate wells of 96-well plates. TaqMan target mixes for Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) (Hs00544830_m1), basic leucine zipper transcription factor 2 (BACH2) (Hs00222364_m1), interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) (Hs01056533_m1), PR domain containing 1 (PRDM1) (Hs00153357_m1), carnitine palmitoyltransferase IA (CPT1A)(Hs00912671_m1), carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT2)(Hs00988962_m1), fatty acid synthase (FASN) (Hs01005622_m1), sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) (Hs01088679_g1), were purchased from Applied Biosystems. The mRNA expression level was normalized to the level of the endogenous control (GAPDH ribosomal RNA, #Hs99999905-m1, Applied Biosystems), and the relative quantity, compared with the PBMC sample as a reference, was calculated by using the quantification-comparative cycle threshold (DDCT) formula. The relative quantity was calculated by using the DDCT formula–referenced sample of PBMCs.
Extracellular Flux Analysis
The XF96 Extracellular Flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA) was used to quantify the oxygen consumption rate (OCR). CD45RA- memory CD4+ T cells stimulated for 3 days were resuspended in XF media and then plated on XF96 cell culture microplates (2 × 105 cells per well) coated with Cell-Tak (BD Biosciences). The OCR was measured in XF media (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM glucose, and 2 mM l-glutamine under both basal conditions and in following the addition of 2 µM oligomycin, 2 µM carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AA).
Electron Microscopy
Cells were collected and immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde solution at 4°C for 4 h. The samples were washed three times with 1 mol/L phosphate buffer, followed by 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, dehydrated in graded concentrations of alcohol (50, 70, 80, 90, and 100%), and embedded in epoxy resin. The embedded samples were then cut into ultra-thin serial sections (80 nm, Ultramicrotome, Leica UC-7, Leica, Germany) and stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. The samples were subsequently visualized using an electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-1200EX, Japan) at 80 kV at the Department of Electron Microscopy Center of University of Occupational & Environmental Health.
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
2×105 CD45RA-CD4+ cells metabolome under different conditions were extracted with 50% acetonitrile-water. Dried powder was dissolved in 20 mg/ml pyridine in methoxylamine-HCl, followed by N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoro-acetamide (MSTFA) reagent. The metabolome was identified using GC/MS (JMS-Q1500, 7890GC, JEOL, Japan) equipped with a direct capillary column DB–5MS sized 30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm film thickness. The column temperature was set at 80°C for 2 min and gradually increased at 15°C/min until it reached 320°C then held for 12 min. The temperature of the injector was adjusted to 230°C and the MS transfer line was adjusted to 250°C. Helium gas was used as the carrier gas, which was injected at a constant flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. In the next step, 1 μl of the sample was injected with a solvent delay at 2 min. An autosampler (7650A) was coupled with the GC and set in split mode for automatic injection of the samples and solvents. The effluent of GC column was transferred directly into the source of the MS through the transfer line. Electron ionization mass spectrometry fragments were initiated at 70 eV within the range of 30–500 m/z at a full scan mode. The temperature of the ion source was adjusted to 200°C. NIST mass spectral libraries were used to identify the obtained mass spectra of the active molecules in the extract.
Statistical Analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated. Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance by the paired- or unpaired-t test. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the relation between two variables of interest. A p-value of <0.05 denoted the presence of statistical significance. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Prism software (Prism Software, Irvine, CA).
Results
Accumulation of IFN-γ Producing-CXCR3loT-bethi Effector Memory CD4+ Cells in SLE
First, we used T-bet, CXCR3, and IFN-γ, which are originally known as typical markers of Th1 cells, to examine possible abnormalities of Th1 cells in the peripheral blood of SLE patients. Table 1 summarizes the clinical background of the Japanese 60 participating patients. They included 5 males and 55 females, with a mean disease duration of 142 months, SLEDAI of 11.5 ± 9.0, BILAG 12.9 ± 11.0, clinical relevant organ involvement (lupus nephritis 33.3%, central nervous system 23.3%). We also enrolled 31 age- and gender-matched healthy donors (the control group) (Table 1).
CD4+ T cells were separated into three populations of CXCR3-T-bet-, CXCR3hiT-betlo, and CXCR3loT-bethi cells. The percentage of CXCR3loT-bethi cells among CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in SLE than the control (HD: 1.9 ± 2.8%, SLE: 5.6 ± 8.5%) (Figure 1A). CXCR3-T-bet- cells mainly consisted of CCR7+CD45RA+ naïve cells, CXCR3hiT-betlo cells consisted of CCR7+CD45RA- central memory cells and CCR7-CD45RA- effector memory cells, and CXCR3loT-bethi cells consisted mainly of CCR7-CD45RA- effector memory cells (Figure 1B). CXCR3loT-bethi cells which did not express CD28, were CXCR5-CCR6- cells (Figures 1C, D). The percentage of HLA-DR+CD38+ cells among CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in SLE than the control. In addition, the percentage of HLA-DR+CD38+ cells among CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in CXCR3loT-bethi cells than CXCR3-T-bet- and CXCR3hiT-betlo cells in SLE (Figures 1E, F). CXCR3loT-bethi cells were Foxp3- cells (Figure 1G). CXCR3loT-bethi cells showed high potential for IFN-γ production selectively in patients with SLE but not in the control (Figure 1H).
Next, we examined the relation of CXCR3loT-bethi cells to the clinical background of patients with SLE. The results showed that disease duration and treatment resistance were the parameter that significantly related to the percentage of CXCR3loT-bethi cells (Figure 2).
High IFN-γ Producing T-bet+Foxp3lo Non-Suppressive Cells and Low IFN-γ Non-Producing T-bet+Foxp3hi-Activated-Treg Cells Percentages in SLE
Next, we analyzed the changes in T-bet+Foxp3+ cells in SLE patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. For this purpose, peripheral blood FoxP3+CD4+ cells were divided to three subsets of CD45RA+Foxp3lo naïve-Treg, CD45RA-Foxp3lo non-suppressive cells, and CD45RA-Foxp3hi activated-Treg (22). There were no differences in the percentages of CD45RA+FoxP3lo naïve-Treg, CD45RA-FoxP3hi activated-Treg between SLE and the control. However, the percentage of CD45RA-FoxP3lo non-suppressive cells was significantly higher in SLE than the control (Figure 3A). Considering in detail of these populations, the percentage of IFN-γ producing-T-bet+ cells among CD45RA-Foxp3lo non-suppressive cells was higher while the percentage of IFN-γ non-producing-T-bet+ cells among CD45RA-FoxP3hi activated-Treg cells was lower in patients with SLE, compared to the control (Figures 3B, C).
Activation of mTOR, which is known to induce various anabolic processes, such as aerobic glycolysis, is important in the maintenance of a balance between Teff and Treg differentiation (23). Phosphorylation of mTOR in peripheral CD4+ T cells of patients with SLE was significantly higher than the control. Phosphorylation of mTOR was significantly correlated with T-bet expression in CXCR3loT-bethiCD4+ cells, but not in total CD4+ cells (Figure 3D). These results suggest that activation of mTOR can affect the imbalance between Th1 subsets.
Rapamycin Induced IFN-γ-Producing-T-bet+Foxp3lo Cells, Whereas 2DG Induced IFN-γ-Non-Producing-T-bet+Foxp3hi Cells by Different Effects on Lipid Metabolism
In the next step, we examined in vitro the effects of rapamycin, a mTORC1 inhibitor, and 2DG, a glycolysis inhibitor, on cell metabolism, differentiation, and function in stimulated memory CD4+ cells obtained from HDs, as only a few CD4+CD45RA- memory T cells were obtained from the patients with SLE. Stimulation with anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs induced mTOR phosphorylation and T-bet expression selectively in CD45RA-CD4+ memory cells (Figure 4A). The addition of rapamycin or 2DG reduced the percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3- Teff cells and increased CD4+CD25+Foxp3hi Treg cells among CD45RA-CD4+ cells, with a resultant significant increase in the Treg/Teff ratio (Supplemental Figure 1A). BACH2, IRF4, PRDM1, and EZH2 are transcriptional factors important for the differentiation and function of effector Treg cells (24–27). Both rapamycin and 2DG induced upregulation of BACH2, IRF4, PRDM1, and EZH2 in CD45RA-CD4+ cells (Supplemental Figure 1B). Evaluation of the changes in Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines demonstrated that rapamycin and 2DG had different effects on these cytokines, especially their effects on Th1 cytokines. For example, anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs-stimulated IFN-γ was more strongly inhibited by 2DG than by rapamycin. In contrast, interleukin (IL) 2 was not induced by anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs stimulation but strongly induced only by 2DG (Supplemental Figure 1C).
Next, we assessed the effects of rapamycin and 2DG on T-bet+Foxp3+ cells differentiation. Rapamycin induced IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3lo cells. On the other hand, 2DG induced IFN-γ-non-producing T-bet+Foxp3hi cells (Figures 4B, C). Both rapamycin-induced T-bet+FoxP3lo cells and 2DG-induced T-bet+FoxP3hi cells produced IL-10, and the production tended to be slightly larger in the latter (Figure 4D). Since rapamycin and 2DG have different effects on T-bet+Foxp3+ cell differentiation, we next examined the mechanism from the perspective of cell metabolism using CD4+CD45RA- memory T cells obtained from HDs. Although rapamycin and 2DG had similar effects on the dynamics of cellular metabolism, such as aerobic glycolysis, mitochondrial function and glutaminolysis (Supplemental Figures 2, 3), their effect on lipid metabolism was different. The expression levels of fatty acid oxidation-related enzymes such as CPT1a and CPT2 were increased by both rapamycin and 2DG, while the expression levels of fatty acid synthesis-related enzymes such as FASN and SREBF1 were more highly increased by rapamycin compared with 2DG. This effect of rapamycin was coupled with larger increases in palmitic and stearic acid levels compared with 2DG, suggestive of enhancement of lipid metabolism, selectively in fatty acid synthesis (Figures 4E–G). These results indicate that rapamycin, but not 2DG, enhanced lipid metabolism, resulting in distinct effect in T-bet+Foxp3+ cell differentiation and its IFN-γ production.
Inhibition of Fatty Acid Synthesis in Memory CD4+ Cells Obtained From SLE Patients Resulted in Suppression of IFN-γ Production and Up-Regulated Foxp3 Expression in T-bet+Foxp3+ Cells
We also investigated the role of dyslipidemia in the observed changes in T-bet+Foxp3+ cell differentiation and IFN-γ production by memory CD4+ T cells of HDs and SLE patients. The results showed that stimulation of the memory CD4+ T cells with anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs induced IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3+ cells in SLE samples (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the addition of rapamycin increased IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3+ cells in HDs cells. However, unlike the results in HDs cells, IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3+ cells remained unchanged by the addition of rapamycin in SLE patients (Figures 5B, C). Moreover, IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3+ cells did not change following the addition to rapamycin of etomoxir, a fatty acid β oxidation inhibitor, but was significantly inhibited by C75, a fatty acid synthesis inhibitor in both HDs and SLE patients (Figure 5B, Supplementary Figure 4A). The addition of C75 to rapamycin increased Foxp3 expression in T-bet+Foxp3+ cells to a level similar to that seen with 2DG (Figure 5C, Supplementary Figure 4B).
Finally, we evaluated the effects of various metabolic regulators on the production of IFN-γ and IL-2, which are two Th1 cytokines produced by memory CD4+ T cells in HDs and SLE. IFN-γ production induced by anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs stimulation was inhibited by rapamycin and 2DG and further inhibited by the combination of C75 plus rapamycin in both HDs and SLE patients (Figure 5D, Supplementary Figure 4C). Interestingly, 2DG, but not anti-CD3 Abs and anti-CD28 Abs stimulation, induced IL-2 production in both HDs and SLE patients (Figure 5D).
Discussion
We investigated the changes in Th1 subsets in SLE and their involvement in SLE pathology. Our results showed abundance of T-bethiCXCR3lo effector cells and T-bet+Foxp3lo non-suppressive cells (which produce large amounts of IFN-γ) in SLE, compared with deficiency of T-bet+Foxp3hi activated-Treg cells (which do not produce IFN-γ). These changes were considered to be involved in treatment resistance. In the in vitro arm of the study, we showed that treatment of stimulated memory CD4+ cells with rapamycin and 2DG resulted in suppression of T-bet+Foxp3- cells and induction of T-bet+Foxp3+(lo/hi) cells. Interestingly, rapamycin alone enhanced lipid metabolism and induced IFN-γ-producing T-bet+Foxp3lo cells, whereas 2DG induced IFN-γ-non-producing T-bet+Foxp3hi cells. In memory CD4+ cells of SLE patients, inhibition of fatty acid synthesis suppressed IFN-γ production and enhanced Foxp3 expression in T-bet+Foxp3+ cells. Thus, our results demonstrated that SLE is associated with IFN-γ overproduction by Th1 cells and Th1 subset imbalance due to metabolic abnormalities including enhanced fatty acid synthesis.
In the 1990–2010, SLE pathology was discussed in the context of a balance between Th1 and Th2, together with the involvement of Th1 (4, 5). However, Th1 is only defined as an IFN-γ-producing cell, and other important markers for Th1 such as CXCR3 and T-bet, have not been simultaneously examined in these papers. Recently, the diversity of Th cells has been reported, and CXCR3, T-bet, and IFN-γ have been reported to be expressed not only in Th1 but also in other diverse Th subsets. In particular, it was reported that TPH and Th10, which attract much attention and are important for B cell help, produced IFN-γ and expressed CXCR3 and T-bet (6, 7). In our study, the simultaneous confirmation of CXCR3, T-bet, and IFN-γ expression in CD4+ cells revealed that CXCR3loT-bethi cells, rather than CXCR3hiT-betlo cells, overproduced IFN-γ and was closely involved in the pathogenesis of SLE, including treatment resistance (Figures 1, 2). In addition, our results suggest that not only the aerobic glycolysis but also fatty acid synthesis may be involved in the subset imbalance and overproduction of IFN-γ in Th1 cells (Figure 5D).
In 2002, Gergely and colleagues (28) were the first to describe the metabolic changes in CD4+ T cells in SLE, including increased mitochondrial membrane potential (hyperpolarization) and increased ROS production. Activation of mTORC1 in CD4+ T cells has also been reported in a lupus mouse model as well as in SLE patients (29, 30), suggesting that differentiation to Th1 and Th17 is enhanced by mTORC1 in wild-type and autoimmune mice. Previous studies also discussed the importance of lipid metabolism in Th17 differentiation (31). Furthermore, various metabolic abnormalities have been described in CD4+ T cells of SLE patients, but many aspects of SLE pathology remain unknown (32, 33). Our study highlighted the pathogenic roles of IFN-γ overproduction and imbalance of T-bet+Foxp3- and T-bet+Foxp3+ cells, and that abnormal fatty acid synthesis is an important metabolic abnormality mediating the above changes.
The functional properties of mTORC1 include enhancement of mRNA translation, ribosome biogenesis, and glycolysis in the downstream, as well as inhibition of catabolic metabolism, such as autophagy, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria (34, 35). Rapamycin is known as an mTORC1 inhibitor whereas 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) is a glycolysis inhibitor. Studies in experimental animals have demonstrated that mTORC1 activity and inhibition of aerobic glycolysis by rapamycin and 2DG are associated with suppression of Teff cell and induction of Treg cells (36–38). However, the effect of rapamycin and 2DG to human CD4+ T cells, especially memory CD4+ T cells remained unclear. In addition, there is no consensus on the role of mTORC1 in the induction of Treg differentiation (39, 40). In related studies, it was demonstrated that Treg cells induced by selective mTORC1 deficiency by deletion of TSC and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and persistent activation, lacked immunosuppressive capacity (40, 41). Furthermore, mTORC1 deficient mice exhibited inhibition of Treg induction, setting a series of inflammatory processes (42). Several studies reported that T-bet+ Treg cells inhibit Th1 differentiation and Th1-related autoimmunopathologies (15, 43–46), while others indicated that these cells do not possess such suppressive activity (47). Thus, fractionation of (T-bet+) Foxp3+ CD4+ cells includes populations of plastic and non-functional or rather pro-inflammatory cells. It is suggested that rapamycin may promote the differentiation of these cells.
It has been reported that CD45RA-Foxp3lo non-suppressive T cells are increased in SLE patients and that these cells produce IFN-γ and IL-2 and exhibit little suppressive activity (48). On the other hand, CD45RA-Foxp3hi cells (activated-Treg) have not been found to be consistent (48, 49). In the present study, CD45RA-Foxp3lo non-suppressive T cells were increased in patients with SLE as previously reported (Figure 3A). By focusing on Th1 markers such as T-bet, IFN-γ, we found that T-bet+IFN-γ+CD45RA-Foxp3lo non-suppressive T cells were increased, while T-bet+IFN-γ-Foxp3hiCD45RA- activated-Treg cells were decreased (Figures 3B, C), and the imbalance of these subsets was caused by enhanced fatty acid synthesis (Figures 5B, C).
Although the mTOR signaling inhibitors, including rapamycin, have been reported to be important metabolic control drugs in SLE patients, it has limited effectiveness (50). Our study demonstrated that, unlike rapamycin, 2DG induced IFN-γ non-producing T-bet+Foxp3hi activated-Treg cells differentiation and IL-2 production. In this regard, previous studies reported that a decrease in serum IL-2 level in SLE patients is associated with inhibition of Treg function with consequent enhancement of inflammatory pathology (51, 52). In fact, previous studies showed that administration of a small amount of soluble IL-2 was associated with an increase in Treg cells with a resultant control of SLE disease activity (53). Evidence suggests that the primary cells that produce IL-2 are activated Th cells (54, 55). Our study demonstrated that 2DG induced the production of IL-2 from memory CD4+ cells in patients with SLE (Figure 5D), suggesting that 2DG does not only correct the abnormality of Th1 subsets through the control of abnormal cell metabolism but also improve the pathological status of SLE through the induction of IL-2 production.
Limitations of this study were that a limited number of memory CD4+ T cells can be isolated from the peripheral blood in patients with SLE, and therefore, detailed analysis of the mechanisms occurring in the memory CD4+ T cells derived from the patients was unfeasible. Furthermore, the annual incidence of SLE without treatments for the disease is too limited to allow us to perform these studies.
Taken together, SLE patients exhibited IFN-γ overproduction by Th1 cells and subset imbalance of these cells, suggesting the involvement of Th1 cells in SLE pathology such as treatment resistance. Metabolic regulators, particularly fatty acid synthesis inhibitors, may be therapeutically beneficial in SLE by correcting these abnormalities.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, and each subject provided a signed consent form (H29-045). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
SI wrote the manuscript and designed the experiments. SI, MZ, HH, GT, MH, YM, NO, YS-K, YaT, HM, MU, AN, SN, and KS performed the experiments. SI, MZ, HH, YM, and NO analyzed the data. YoT supervised the project. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant number #JP16K09928 and the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, through UOEH Grant for Advanced Research (#H29-903 and #H30-905).
Conflict of Interest
KS is an employee of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. SN has received speaking fees from Bristol Myers, Sanofi, Abbvie, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Pfizer, Takeda, and also research grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, and MSD. YT received research grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, MSD, Astellas, Abbvie, and Eisai.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the patients and healthy volunteers for their cooperation and consent to participate in the study. The authors also thank Ms. N. Sakaguchi, T. Umata, and K. Hara for the excellent technical assistance (Umata Toshiyoki RI Center, Sakaguchi Narumi, Hara Kyoko Shared-Use Research Center).
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.593103/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Baechler EC, Batliwalla FM, Karypis G, Gaffney PM, Ortmann WA, Espe KJ, et al. Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100:2610–15. 10.1073/pnas.0337679100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chiche L, Jourde-Chiche N, Whalen E, Presnell S, Gersuk V, Dang K, et al. Modular transcriptional repertoire analyses of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus reveal distinct type I and type II interferon signatures. Arthritis Rheumatol (2014) 66:1583–95. 10.1002/art.38628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tsokos GC. Syst Lupus Erythematosus N Engl J Med (2011) 365:2110–21. 10.1056/NEJMra1100359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Akahoshi M, Nakashima H, Tanaka Y, Kohsaka T, Nagano S, Ohgami E, et al. Th1/Th2 balance of peripheral T helper cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol (1999) 42:1644–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Harigai M, Kawamoto M, Hara M, Kubota T, Kamatani N, Miyasaka N. Excessive Production of IFN-γ in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Its Contribution to Induction of B Lymphocyte Stimulator/B Cell-Activating Factor/TNF Ligand Superfamily-13B. J Immunol (2008) 181(3):2211–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.2211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Caielli S, Veiga DT, Balasubramanian P, Athale S, Domic B, Murat E, et al. A CD4+ T cell population expanded in lupus blood provides B cell help through interleukin-10 and succinate. Nat Med (2019) 25:75–81. 10.1038/s41591-018-0254-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rao DA, Gurish MF, Marshall JL, Slowikowski K, Fonseka CY, Liu Y, et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature (2017) 542:110–4. 10.1038/nature20810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wang S, Wang J, Kumar V, Karnell JL, Naiman B, Gross PS, et al. IL-21 drives expansion and plasma cell differentiation of autoreactive CD11chiT-bet+ B cells in SLE. Nat Commun (2018) 9:1758. 10.1038/s41467-018-03750-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Zumaquero E, Marigorta UM, Patel AV, Wang X, et al. Distinct Effector B Cells Induced by Unregulated Toll-like Receptor 7 Contribute to Pathogenic Responses in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Immunity (2018) 49:725–39. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rubtsova K, Rubtsov AV, Thurman JM, Mennona JM, Kappler JW, Marrack P. B cells expressing the transcription factor T-bet drive lupus-like autoimmunity. J Clin Invest (2017) 127:1392–404. 10.1172/JCI91250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wu C, Fu Q, Guo Q, Chen S, Goswami S, Sun S, et al. Lupus-associated atypical memory B cells are mTORC1-hyperactivated and functionally dysregulated. Ann Rheum Dis (2019) 78:1090–100. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bocharnikov AV, Keegan J, Wacleche VS, Cao Y, Fonseka CY, Wang G, et al. PD-1hiCXCR5- T peripheral helper cells promote B cell responses in lupus via MAF and IL-21. JCI Insight (2019) 4:130062. 10.1172/jci.insight.130062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell (2000) 100:655–69. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80702-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lazarevic V, Glimcher LH. Lord GM. T-bet: a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:777–89. 10.1038/nri3536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Levine AG, Medoza A, Hemmers S, Moltedo B, Niec RE, Schizas M, et al. Stability and function of regulatory T cells expressing the transcription factor T-bet. Nature (2017) 546:421–25. 10.1038/nature22360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Iwata S, Mikami Y, Sun HW, Brooks SR, Jankovic D, Hirahara K, et al. The Transcription Factor T-bet Limits Amplification of Type I IFN Transcriptome and Circuitry in T Helper 1 Cells. Immunity (2017) 46:983–91. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. O’Neill LA, Kishton RJ. Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat Rev Immunol (2016) 16:553–65. 10.1038/nri.2016.70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Finlay DK. Metabolic regulation of natural killer cells. Biochem Soc Trans (2015) 43:758–62. 10.1042/BST20150116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. O’Neill LA, Pearce EJ. Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J Exp Med (2016) 213:15–23. 10.1084/jem.20151570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Phan AT, Goldrath AW, Glass CK. Metabolic and Epigenetic Coordination of T Cell and Macrophage Immunity. Immunity (2017) 46:714–29. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Boothby M, Rickert RC. Metabolic Regulation of the Immune Humoral Response. Immunity (2017) 46:743–55. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Miyara M, Yoshioka Y, Kitoh A, Shima T, Wing K, Niwa A, et al. Functional delineation and differentiation dynamics of human CD4+ T cells expressing the FoxP3 transcription factor. Immunity (2009) 30:899–911. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Park Y, Jin HS, Lopez J, Elly C, Kim G, Murai M, et al. TSC1 regulates the balance between effector and regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest (2013) 123:5165–78. 10.1172/JCI69751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cretney E, Xin A, Shi W, Minnich M, Masson F, Miasari M, et al. The transcription factors Blimp-1 and IRF4 jointly control the differentiation and function of effector regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:304–11. 10.1038/ni.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yang XP, Jiang K, Hirahara K, Vahedi G, Afzali B, Sciume G, et al. EZH2 is crucial for both differentiation of regulatory T cells and T effector cell expansion. Sci Rep (2015) 5:10643. 10.1038/srep10643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. DuPage M, Chopra G, Quiros J, Rosenthal WL, Morar MM, Holohan D, et al. The chromatin-modifying enzyme Ezh2 is critical for the maintenance of regulatory T cell identity after activation. Immunity (2015) 42:227–38. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Roychoudhuri R, Hirahara K, Mousavi K, Clever D, Klebanoff CA, Bonelli M, et al. BACH2 represses effector programs to stabilize T(reg)-mediated immune homeostasis. Nature (2013) 498:506–10. 10.1038/nature12199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gergely P, Jr, Grossman C, Niland B, Puskas F, Neupane H, Allam F, et al. Mitochondrial hyperpolarization and ATP depletion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol (2002) 46:175–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Fernandez D, Perl A. mTOR signaling: a central pathway to pathogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus? Discovery Med (2010) 9:173–78. 10.1038/nrd3123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yin Y, Choi SC, Xu Z, Perry DJ, Seay H, Croker BP, et al. Normalization of CD4+ T cell metabolism reverses lupus. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7:274ra18. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Berod L, Friedrich C, Nandan A, Freitag J, Hagemann S, Harmrolfs K, et al. De novo fatty acid synthesis controls the fate between regulatory T and T helper 17 cells. Nat Med (2014) 20:1327–33. 10.1038/nm.3704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Morel L. Immunometabolism in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2017) 13:280–90. 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sharabi A, Tsokos GC. T cell metabolism: new insights in systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2020) 16:100–12. 10.1038/s41584-019-0356-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zeng H, Chi H. mTOR signaling in the differentiation and function of regulatory and effector T cells. Curr Opin Immunol (2017) 46:103–11. 10.1016/j.coi.2017.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pollizzi KN, Powell JD. Regulation of T cells by mTOR: the known knowns and the known unknowns. Trends Immunol (2015) 36:13–20. 10.1016/j.it.2014.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Shi LZ, Wang R, Huang G, Vogel P, Neale G, Green DR, et al. HIF1alpha-dependent glycolytic pathway orchestrates a metabolic checkpoint for the differentiation of TH17 and Treg cells. J Exp Med (2011) 208:1367–76. 10.1084/jem.20110278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gerriets VA, Kishton RJ, Nichols AG, Macintyre AN, Inoue M, Ilkayeva O, et al. Metabolic programming and PDHK1 control CD4+ T cell subsets and inflammation. J Clin Invest (2015) 125:194–207. 10.1172/JCI76012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Newton R, Priyadharshini B, Turka LA. Immunometabolism of regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol (2016) 17:618–25. 10.1038/ni.3466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Powell JD, Pollizzi KN, Heikamp EB, Horton MR. Regulation of immune responses by mTOR. Annu Rev Immunol (2012) 30:39–68. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Park Y, Jin HS, Lopez J, Elly C, Kim G, Murai M, et al. TSC1 regulates the balance between effector and regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest (2013) 123:5165–78. 10.1172/JCI69751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Shrestha S, Yang K, Guy C, Vogel P, Neale G, Chi H. Treg cells require the phosphatase PTEN to restrain TH1 and TFH cell responses. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:178–87. 10.1038/ni.3076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zeng H, Yang K, Cloer C, Neale G, Vogel P, Chi H. mTORC1 couples immune signals and metabolic programming to establish T(reg)-cell function. Nature (2013) 499:485–90. 10.1038/nature12297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Koch MA, Tucker-Heard G, Perdue NR, Killebrew JR, Urdahl KB, Campbell DJ. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:595–602. 10.1038/ni.1731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Koch MA, Thomas KR, Perdue NR, Smigiel KS, Srivastava S. Campbell DJ. T-bet(+) Treg cells undergo abortive Th1 cell differentiation due to impaired expression of IL-12 receptor β2. Immunity (2012) 37:501–10. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yu F, Sharma S, Edwards J, Feigenbaum L, Zhu J. Dynamic expression of transcription factors T-bet and GATA-3 by regulatory T cells maintains immunotolerance. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:197–206. 10.1038/ni.3053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Tan TG, Mathis D, Benoist C. Singular role for T-BET+CXCR3+ regulatory T cells in protection from autoimmune diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2016) 113:14103–08. 10.1073/pnas.1616710113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. McPherson RC, Turner DG, Mair I, O’Connor RA. Anderton SM. T-bet Expression by Foxp3(+) T Regulatory Cells is Not Essential for Their Suppressive Function in CNS Autoimmune Disease or Colitis. Front Immunol (2015) 6:69. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Suen JL, Chiang BL. CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T-cells in human systemic lupus erythematosus. J Formos Med Assoc (2012) Sep 111(9):465–70. 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li W, Deng C, Yang H, Wang G. The Regulatory T Cell in Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol (2019) 10:159. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Perl A. Activation of mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2016) 12:169–82. 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Humrich JY, Morbach H, Undeutsch R, Enghard P, Rosenberger S, Weigert O, et al. Homeostatic imbalance of regulatory and effector T cells due to IL-2 deprivation amplifies murine lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2010) 107:204–9. 10.1073/pnas.0903158107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. von Spee-Mayer C, Siegert E, Abdirama D, Rose A, Klaus A, Alexander T, et al. Low-dose interleukin-2 selectively corrects regulatory T cell defects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75:1407–15. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. He J, Zhang X, Wei Y, Sun X, Chen Y, Deng J, et al. Low-dose interleukin-2 treatment selectively modulates CD4(+) T cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med (2016) 22:991–3. 10.1038/nm.4148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Malek TR. The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol (2008) 26:453–79. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Boyman O, Sprent J. The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12:180–90. 10.1038/nri3156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).