Abstract
Star fruit toxicity has been hugely described in patients with chronic kidney disease, either on conservative or renal replacement therapy. This is a case report of a man, without prior kidney or neurological dysfunction, who appeared to develop nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity less than 12 hours after drinking concentrated star fruit juice (approximately 20 units of the fruit). He received timely renal replacement therapy and renal function fully recovered after discharge.
Keywords: acute renal failure, dialysis, neurological injury, adult intensive care, nutrition
Background
Star fruit (Averrhoa carambola) is a member of the Oxalidaceae family, introduced from tropical America more than 150 years ago. Its culture is now widely spread, and the fruit is generally consumed in natura or in juices, either natural or industrialised.1 Transversal cuts through its five or six sides have a star shape. There are many subspecies of fruit, and it is noticed that the sourer the fruit, the larger the concentration of oxalic acid.2–4
The ingestion of huge amounts of star fruit can induce nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity. Many outbreaks of intoxication have been associated with variable neurological signs, especially affecting patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).5–7 Star fruit toxicity was initially described in 1980 by Muir and Lan.8 The group showed that seizures were induced by intraperitoneal injections of star fruit extract exceeding 8 g/kg. The toxic effects in humans are related to the amount of oxalic acid and also to a neurotoxin (‘caramboxin’) extracted from the star fruit, which is capable of inducing seizures and acute neurotoxicity.9 10
The following report suggests that careful attention is necessary when investigating patients who ingested large amounts of star fruit, even in the absence of previous comorbidities, and that adequate treatment must be promptly initiated.
Case presentation
The patient was a 43-year-old Caucasian man, who was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), complaining about hiccups, nausea, vomiting, malaise and headache. He was agitated, and his blood test result showed high levels of urea (80 mg/dL) and creatinine (5 mg/dL). The patient mentioned that the symptoms appeared 6 days prior as unstoppable hiccups after the ingestion of the natural juice of 20 medium units of star fruit, diluted in 2 L of water. The hiccups started less than 12 hours after ingestion and worsened with time. At the first medical evaluation, the patient was awake, conscious, haemodynamically stable and oriented in time and space but showed intense psychomotor agitation. His pupils were isochoric; the patient was breathing normally, was well hydrated and showed no oedema of the ankles. He had no history of psychiatric, neurological or cardiovascular disturbances and denied substance abuse of any kind. He related the elimination of a renal calculus 8 months before this admission. He had underwent routine laboratory tests 2 months prior, and kidney function was normal.
His physical examination showed a blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg and heart rate of 88 bpm. The Oxigen Saturation (SO2) was 98%. The neurological evaluation was also normal, besides agitation.
The initial and follow-up blood test results are summarised in tables 1 and 2. The abdominal CT scan, as well as total abdominal ultrasound, showed no anatomical changes or signs of kidney stones.
Table 1.
Renal function according to the evaluation time
| Time (days) | Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | Serum urea (mg/dL) |
| −60 | 0.8 | 29.0 |
| 1* | 5.0 | 80.0 |
| 5 | 2.2 | 38.0 |
| 12 | 1.3 | 30.3 |
| 30 | 0.8 | 28.2 |
*First evaluation day.
Table 2.
Laboratory tests results
| White cell count | Results | Red blood cell count | Results |
| Leucocytes/mL | 8600 | Red blood cells (million) | 4.47 |
| Neutrophils/mL | 4644 | Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.0 |
| Segment-nucleated neutrophils/mL | 86 | Hematocrit (%) | 41.0 |
| Eosinophils/mL | 172 | Mean globular volume (fL) | 91.72 |
| Linfocytes/mL | 3440 | Mean globular haemoglobin (pg) | 31.32 |
| Monocytes/mL | 344 | ||
| Platelets (mm3) | 393 000 | ||
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 142 | Magnesium (mg/mL) | 2.0 |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.4 | Phosphorus (mg/mL) | 2.5 |
| Total calcium (mg/dL) | 9.3 | Uric acid (mg/mL) | 3.6 |
| GTR(UI/L) | 51.0 | ||
| AST (U/L) | 45.0 | ||
| ALT (U/L) | 81.0 | ||
| Urinalysis | Urinaysis (microscopy) | ||
| Colour | Light yellow | Epithelial cells | Few |
| Density | 1020 | Leucocytes/high power field | 03 |
| pH | 6.5 | Red cells/high power field | 10 |
| Ascorbic acid | Absent | Cilinders | Absent |
| Proteins | Absent | Crystals | Absent |
| Glucose | Absent | Granulations | Absent |
| Ketones | Absent | Mucus | Present |
| Nitrites | Absent | ||
| Urobilins | Absent | ||
| Urine culture | No bacterial growth in 48 hours |
ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase; GTR, Glutamate Transferase Rate.
Differential diagnosis
The main hypothesis, acute star fruit intoxication due to accumulation of oxalic acid, was confirmed by the lab tests (Urinary oxalate 110 mg/day on a 24-hour urine collection). The differential diagnosis was acute renal injury due to nephrolithiasis due to the medical history of the patient (although the patient did not complain about pain) or pyelonephritis, despite the absence of fever and toxaemia.
Treatment
The hypothesis of nephrotoxic acute kidney injury and acute neurotoxicity due to the ingestion of star fruit was considered, and therapeutic measures were taken. Abundant hydration with 30 mL/kg/day of saline 0.9% and sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) were initiated. Four sessions of SLED, with the duration of 6 hours each, were performed. Psychomotor agitation worsened on the first 2 days of dialysis, but after that, the patient showed progressive clinical improvement and was discharged from the ICU on the fifth day after admission. He then developed polyuria and went through full recovery of renal function, being discharged from the hospital on the 12th day of admission, with a serum creatinine level of 1.3 md/dL. He was kept on clinical follow-up and showed no further renal or neurological disturbances.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient was followed up for 30 days after his outpatient discharge. Laboratory tests were performed showing the recovery of renal function (table 1). The patient no longer had previous complaints.
Discussion
There have been lots of warnings to patients with CKD about the potential toxicity of star fruit, especially in late stages of the disease. This report, however, emphasises the fact that consumption of large quantities of star fruit juice (20 units, weighting 70–100 g) even in individuals with no previous kidney or neurological disease can result in acute injury. There is a correlation between the amount of fruit ingested, varying from small pieces to bigger amounts in a determined time period, and the signs manifested.11 Neto et al11 organised the toxic effects of star fruit in three levels:
Light intoxication: hiccups, vomiting and insomnia.
Moderate intoxication: psychomotor agitation, tingling, paraesthesias, loss of limb force, and lightheadedness.
Severe intoxication: severe psychic agitation, mental confusion, numbness and coma, seizures evolving to status epilepticus, haemodynamic instability, hypotension and shock.
However, all these data where obtained from patients on chronic haemodialysis. Cases of severe neurotoxicity due to star fruit consumption in patients with previous kidney dysfunction may be resolved by haemodialysis,10 12 but some authors believe that oxalic acid and its by-products, which are of low molecular weight and thermostable (caramboxin), may be involved in the mechanisms of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity of star fruit. It is believed that seizures are due to a specific action of caramboxin on GABA (Gamma-aminobutyric Acid) and glutamaergic receptors, altering the link of GABA to these receptors.13 14
Very few cases regarding the association of acute renal damage to the ingestion of huge amounts off star fruit-derived products have been described. Fasting and dehydration seem to increase the risk of toxicity and the development of symptoms.11 15 The diagnosis is generally firmed on clinical basis, since kidney biopsies are not recommended as a routine diagnostic procedure in acute kidney injury,16 and the patients generally recover quickly when therapy is timely started in star fruit intoxication.7 15 In the present case, the average time between the initiation of symptoms and ingestion of star fruit juice was 12 hours, and the amount of juice ingested was approximately 2 L (20 units of fruit). Although even a small amount of fruit may induce severe neurological complications that can lead to the death of patients with CKD, the levels of intoxication may vary, and many factors, including the genetic profile and ethnicity, may be involved.1
The presumption of acute star fruit intoxication demands an early start of haemodialysis, which is the most efficient form of treatment, especially in moderate to severe cases, such as the present one described. Peritoneal dialysis must not be used as its efficiency has not been confirmed. Continuous renal replacement therapy methods may be even more efficient in the most severe cases, when haemodynamic instability and/or status epilepticus may intensify as a result of a rebound effect in shorter and faster forms of dialysis.11 If conventional haemodialysis is proposed, it must be offered on a daily basis, with an extended duration of 6–8 hours, to avoid this rebound effect. Seizures are always related to a poorer prognosis. Fatal outcomes are generally observed in patients who were belatedly dialysed or received no dialysis at all.
Learning points.
Patients with impaired kidney function, even in the early stages, should be strongly advised to avoid the ingestion of star fruit.
This educational role must be played by nephrologists, nutritionists and dietitians but also by every person involved in kidney care.
Although the reports of intoxication are more frequent in patients under renal replacement therapy, it can also happen to individuals with normal kidney function.
For instance, star fruit toxicity must be considered in the differential diagnosis of cases of numbness and alterations in mental status after large consumption of this fruit.
Intensive care must be promptly initiated in every symptomatic patient to avoid further complications ant potential lethality.
Footnotes
Twitter: @Isolda Prado
Contributors: Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work were made by IPdNNM. Data acquisition, as well as analysis and interpretation and intellectual content were authored by ARJB. Writing, data acquisition, work review was written by KCPI.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Tsai M-H, Chang W-N, Lui C-C, et al. Status epilepticus induced by star fruit intoxication in patients with chronic renal disease. Seizure 2005;14:521–5. 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morton JF. Fruits of warm climates. Miami: Flair Books, 1987: 125–8. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Margen S. The wellness encyclopedia of food and nutrition. New York: Health Letter Association, 1992: 271–2. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Massey LK. Food oxalate: factors affecting measurement, biological variation, and bioavailability. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:1191–4. 10.1016/j.jada.2007.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martin LC, Caramori JST, Barreti P. Soluço intratável desencadeado POR ingestão de carambola (Averrhoa carambola) em portadores de insuficiência renal crônica. J Bras Nefrol 1993;15:92–4. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moyses-Neto M, Carolino RO, Lopes NP, et al. Star fruit : de Broe M, Porter GA, Clinical nephrotoxins. 3rd edn New York: Springer, 2008: 901–12. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen CL, Fang HC, Chou KJ, et al. Acute oxalate nephropathy after ingestion of StAR fruit. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:418–22. 10.1053/ajkd.2001.21333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Muir CK, Lam CK. Depressant action of Averrhoa carambola. Med J Malaysia 1980;34:279–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Neto MM, Robl F, Netto JC. Intoxication by star fruit (Averrhoa carambola) in six dialysis patients? (preliminary report). Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:570–2. 10.1093/ndt/13.3.570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garcia-Cairasco N, Castro OW, Leite-Santos F, et al. A comparative study of status epileticus, spontaneous recurrent seizures and neurodegeneration induced by intrahippocampal microinjections of pilocarpine and caramboxin, a StAR fruit neurotoxina, in Winstar adult male rats. Epilepsia 2007;48:282–3. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Neto MM, Silva GEB, Costa RS, et al. Star fruit: simultaneous neurotoxic and nephrotoxic effects in people with previously normal renal function. NDT Plus 2009;2:485–8. 10.1093/ndtplus/sfp108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Neto MM, da Costa JAC, Garcia-Cairasco N, et al. Intoxication by star fruit (Averrhoa carambola) in 32 uraemic patients: treatment and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:120–5. 10.1093/ndt/18.1.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chang JM, Hwang SJ, Kuo HT, et al. Fatal outcome after ingestion of StAR fruit (Averrhoa carambola) in uremic patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:189–93. 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70325-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brouns R, De Deyn PP. Neurological complications in renal failure: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2004;107:1–16. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fang H-C, Lee P-T, Lu P-J, et al. Mechanisms of StAR fruit-induced acute renal failure. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46:1744–52. 10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract 2012;120:c179–84. 10.1159/000339789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
