Abstract
Insulin and insulin-like growth factors are longevity determinants that negatively regulate Forkhead box class O (FoxO) transcription factors. In C. elegans mutations that constitutively activate DAF-16, the ortholog of mammalian FoxO3a, extend lifespan by two-fold. While environmental insults induce DAF-16 activity in younger animals, it also becomes activated in an age-dependent manner in the absence of stress, modulating gene expression well into late adulthood. The mechanism by which DAF-16 activity is regulated during aging has not been defined. Since phosphorylation of DAF-16 generally leads to its inhibition, we asked whether phosphatases might be necessary for its increased transcriptional activity in adult C. elegans. We focused on the PP2A/4/6 subfamily of phosphoprotein phosphatases, members of which had been implicated to regulate DAF-16 under low insulin signaling conditions but had not been investigated during aging in wildtype animals. Using reverse genetics, we functionally characterized all C. elegans orthologs of human catalytic, regulatory, and scaffolding subunits of PP2A/4/6 holoenzymes in postreproductive adults. We found that PP2A complex constituents PAA-1 and PPTR-1 regulate DAF-16 transcriptional activity during aging and that they cooperate with the catalytic subunit LET-92 to protect adult animals from ultraviolet radiation. PP4 complex members PPH-4.1/4.2, and SMK-1 also appear to regulate DAF-16 in an age-dependent manner, and together with PPFR-2 they contribute to innate immunity. Interestingly, SUR-6 but no other subunit of the PP2A complex was necessary for the survival of pathogen-infected animals. Finally, we found that PP6 complex constituents PPH-6 and SAPS-1 contribute to host defense during aging, apparently without affecting DAF-16 transcriptional activity. Our studies indicate that a set of PP2A/4/6 complexes protect adult C. elegans from environmental stress, thus preserving healthspan. Therefore, along with their functions in cell division and development, the PP2A/4/6 phosphatases also appear to play critical roles later in life.
Introduction
The Insulin and IGF-signaling (IIS) pathway is a primary modulator of lifespan across evolutionarily diverse species [1]. Genetic and behavioral changes that modify IIS pathway activity change the quality and length of life dramatically. Loss-of-function mutations in the insulin receptor correlate with a 2- to 3-fold extension in the lifespan in some species [2]. Moreover, insulin signaling mutants appear more youthful and are more resistant to a variety of environmental insults, demonstrating a connection between stress resistance and lifespan [3, 4]. How well an organism contends with stressful stimuli is a gauge of the potency of its maintenance and repair systems, which, together with its defense strategies, constitute the whole of its means of evading or counteracting the damage that contributes to age-related decline. Since the IIS pathway and its ultimate target, the Forkhead box family (FoxO) transcription factor, profoundly influence lifespan and stress resistance, understanding how they are regulated over time could suggest the basis for the milestones of aging and reveal potential avenues for manipulating the rate of aging.
In the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans the FoxO protein DAF-16 is a transcriptional regulator that determines lifespan in part by conferring resistance to environmental insults. The transcriptional activity of DAF-16 is inhibited when insulin-like ligands bind to the insulin receptor, DAF-2, triggering the kinase AKT-1 to modify DAF-16 with an inhibitory phosphate group that excludes it from the nucleus. In the absence of these soluble ligands, DAF-16 translocates to the nucleus and upregulates the expression of genes that promote longevity, and it is because of this function of DAF-16 that daf-2 mutants live longer than their wildtype counterparts [5]. That is, whereas wildtype worms achieve reproductive maturity three days after hatching from eggs and live for about another 20 days as adults, the adult portion of a daf-2 mutant’s life may stretch for more than 50 days. Even if the IIS pathway is intact DAF-16 activity may be triggered when animals encounter harmful stimuli including high temperature and ultraviolet radiation [6]. Under these stress-inducing conditions, DAF-16 targets may include genes that encode detoxifying enzymes, immune effectors, and chaperones that restore homeostasis, preserve cellular health, and contribute to host defense [7]. Recently we and others have shown that DAF-16 is activated in an age-dependent manner, despite the absence of acute stress. During adulthood, the expression levels of the daf-16a splice isoform, and to an even greater extent the daf-16d isoform progressively increase [8]. This is coupled to increased expression of a subset of DAF-16 transcriptional targets in adults as compared to in larvae, indicating that DAF-16 is activated as C. elegans age [9, 10].
One functional consequence of its increased activity during adulthood is an age-dependent requirement for DAF-16 in innate immunity. When DAF-16 is inhibited specifically in adult animals even before they encounter a pathogen, their ability to resist a bacterial infection is compromised [10]. This suggests that the immune protection conferred by DAF-16 during adulthood is associated with the intrinsic sustained increase in its transcriptional activity that begins during reproduction and persists into late adulthood. Consistent with this possibility, infection does not seem to induce DAF-16 activation in adult C. elegans [10, 11].
In a previous study we asked about the regulatory mechanism responsible for activating DAF-16 in adult animals, and we found the nuclear protein SMK-1 to be required for the age-dependent increase in expression of DAF-16 transcriptional targets [10]. Similar to DAF-16, SMK-1 also contributes to innate immunity in post-reproductive adult C. elegans. Prior to our studies, smk-1 had been characterized in two contexts: daf-2 mutants and during development in wild type animals. In daf-2(e1370) mutants when DAF-16 is constitutively de-repressed smk-1 is required for both lifespan extension and stress resistance [12]. Without SMK-1, the expression of a subset of DAF-16 transcriptional targets in daf-2(e1370) mutants is reduced because of a deficiency in transcription initiation [13]. To regulate transcription in daf-2(e1370) animals, SMK-1 functions together with PPH-4.1, the catalytic subunit of the phosphoprotein phosphatase 4 (PP4) complex in C. elegans. Interestingly, SMK-1 also cooperates with PPH-4.1 during embryonic development in C. elegans, to silence the CHK-1-mediated response to DNA damage on replicating chromatin and thus allow cell cycle progression [14]. SMK-1 is orthologous to D. melanogaster flfl, S. cerevisiae Psy2p, and human PP4R3, a regulatory subunit of the PP4 complex. Whether a PPH-4.1/SMK-1 complex functions during adulthood in wildtype C. elegans is not known.
PP4 is part of a subfamily of phosphoprotein phosphatases that also includes PP2A and PP6. Phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPPs) comprise a large class of evolutionarily conserved enzymes, that antagonize kinases by removing phosphate groups from a broad repertoire of substrates. In evolutionarily diverse species, the PP2A/4/6 subfamily regulates a wide array of processes, including cell cycle progression, meiosis, cellular differentiation, and the activity of multiple signaling pathways including the IIS pathway [15–25]. In C. elegans PP4 is not the only member of the PP2A/4/6 family with a connection to the insulin signaling pathway. Just as the PP4 subunit SMK-1 is required for the extended lifespan of daf-2 mutants, so too is the regulatory subunit of the PP2A complex PPTR-1 [12]. In mammals, the inhibitory phosphorylation imparted to FoxO transcription factors by AKT is opposed by the action of phosphoprotein phosphatase PP2A. Both FoxO1 and FoxO3a are substrates of PP2A, and biochemical evidence indicates that PP2A selectively dephosphorylates the AKT phosphorylation sites of FoxO family members [26–29]. Moreover, PP2A also dephosphorylates AKT itself, thereby inactivating it [30–32]. This particular mechanism of PP2A functioning as an indirect positive regulator of FoxO transcription factors appears to be conserved in C. elegans. In daf-2 mutants, the constitutive activation of DAF-16 requires PPTR-1, a conserved regulatory subunit of PP2A complexes [33]. PPTR-1 associates with AKT-1 but not DAF-16 in worms, and overexpression of PPTR-1 reduces the levels of phosho-AKT-1. Since as a whole the expression levels of insulin-like peptides considered to be agonists of DAF-2 either remain constant or increase during adulthood, the presence of a sustained inhibitory signal through the IIS pathway that persists in adult animals seems likely [9]. A regulator that can counteract this signal is therefore an attractive candidate for functioning to modulate the activity of DAF-16 during aging, and this raises the possibility that multiple members of the PP2A/4/6 family may contribute to the age-dependent functions of DAF-16.
PPPs can be divided into two evolutionarily distinct branches composed of PP1/PP2A/PP2B and PP5/PPEF/PP7 based on divergent regulatory and catalytic domains, with the PP2A subgroup containing the PP2A/PP4/PP6 subfamily [34]. The PP1/2A/4/6 catalytic subunits all have a highly conserved globular domain that acts in concert with one (PP1/6) or two (PP2A/4/6) binding partners. Catalytic subunits of the PP2A/4/6 subfamily associate with regulatory proteins and, in some cases, a scaffolding protein to comprise a functional holocomplex. Multiple versions of the PP2A/4/6 complexes are possible because there are several genes whose products bind and regulate the same catalytic subunit [35]. For example, in humans there are 18 different regulatory proteins capable of associating with the PP2A enzyme, allowing for the generation of nearly 100 holoenzymes [15, 36]. The combinatorial diversity of these complexes is believed to contribute to the subcellular localization, substrate specificity, and thus the functional capacity of the phosphoprotein phosphatases, depending on their subunit composition [37]. Considering that different combinations of subunits allow for the possibility of multiple versions of the PP2A/4/6 complexes and in light of the apparent functional overlap in PP2A and PP4 in regulating DAF-16 in a genetic background where it is hyper-activated, we sought to identify the specific individual constituents of the PPP complexes that might be required for the age-dependent function of DAF-16.
Here we present the first systematic investigation of the role of the PP2A/4/6 subfamily of phosphoprotein phosphatases during aging in wildtype C. elegans. We used a reverse genetic approach to functionally characterize all C. elegans orthologs of human PP2A/4/6 catalytic, scaffold, and regulatory subunits in juvenile and postreproductive adult animals. Specifically, we used RNAi to individually knock down the genes encoding these proteins and examined the effect on the ability of adult C. elegans to resist bacterial infection, ultraviolet irradiation, and thermal stress. Our data suggest that the PP2A and PP4 complexes are important for the age-dependent activity of DAF-16. Moreover, we present evidence to support the existence of multiple versions of PP2A, PP4, and PP6 complexes with apparent specialized functions to protect adult C. elegans from different environmental stresses and thus as a group contribute to preserving healthspan.
Methods
In silico analyses of C. elegans PP2A/4/6 catalytic subunits
To compare the PP2A/4/6 catalytic subunits of the C. elegans to their human orthologs, amino acid sequences of LET-92, PPH-4.1, PPH-4.2 and PPH-6 were downloaded from Wormbase (wormbase.org) and the amino acid sequences of PPP2cA, PPP4c, and PPP6c were downloaded from Genbank (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). The sequences were then aligned using Clustal Omega multiple sequence alignment tool (ebi.ac.uk/msa/clustalo/), and conserved residues and motifs were manually annotated based on existing alignments of phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) proteins [38–40]. Information depicted in the alignment was consolidated in a sequence logo created using weblogo (weblogo.threeplusone.com). To preserve the alignment of sequences within the logo, internal gaps incorporated during the Clustal alignment were made to be represented by “X” instead of “-“. Then, since weblogo requires all the input sequences to be the same length, each sequence was truncated from the N-terminus to match the length of the shortest of the seven proteins, PPP6c (305 amino acids). This corresponds to a range of between 1 (for PPP4c) and 26 N-terminal amino acids (for PPH-4.1 and PPH-6) that were excluded from the sequence logo. Conserved residues and motifs were manually annotated as described above.
C. elegans growth and maintenance
Bristol N2 and VIL001 mjyIs001 [Plys7::gfp] C. elegans strains were grown and maintained under standard laboratory conditions [41]. To generate strain VIL001, stable transgenic animals harboring an extrachromosomal lys-7 promoter::gfp fusion construct [42] were subjected to gamma irradiation to yield a chromosomal integration of Plys7::gfp. F2 segregants of the irradiated P0 animals yielding 100% GFP-expressing progeny were selected for further analysis. One of these lines was backcrossed to the N2 wildtype strain seven times and then designated VIL001.
C. elegans synchronization
Worms were synchronized via sodium hypochlorite treatment [43]. Briefly, gravid adult hermaphrodites were treated with a solution of bleach and KOH to release eggs which were recovered by centrifugation and washed several times in sterile M9 buffer (41 mM Na2HPO4, 22 mM KH2PO4, 8.6 mM NaCl, 19 mM NH4Cl). After hatching overnight in M9 buffer, approximately 2000 first larval stage L1 worms were dropped to fresh, pre-seeded RNAi plates or to Nematode Growth Medium (NGM; 3 g/L NaCl, 25 g/L agar, 2.5 g/L peptone, 5 mg/L cholesterol, 1mM MgSO4, 1mM CaCl2, 2.5% (v/v) KPO4 buffer, pH 6) plates seeded with E. coli OP50.
RNAi treatment
Animals were treated with RNAi through their food source as described by Fraser et al. with modifications as described below [44]. All RNAi sequences were confirmed by sequencing prior to use. Bacteria from the Source BioScience library were streaked onto LB plates containing ampicillin (amp, 50μg/mL) and tetracycline (tet, 1.25μg/mL) and allowed to grow overnight at 37°C. One colony from each plate was used to inoculate 200mL of LB with amp (1ng/mL) and grown overnight in a 37°C shaker. Bacteria were centrifuged at 5,000g for 10 minutes, resuspended in 20mL of LB containing amp, and 1mL was dropped onto individual RNAi plates (standard NGM plates with 1mg/mL carbenicillin, 2μM IPTG). Lawns of E. coli RNAi clones were allowed to grow for at least two days before worms were introduced to the plates. Except in the cases where either let-92 or paa-1 were the targets of the treatment, synchronized cohorts of L1 larvae were dropped onto seeded RNAi plates and maintained at 20°C. When these animals reached the fourth larval stage (L4) they were transferred to pre-seeded RNAi plates containing 25 μg/mL FUdR (5-fluorodeoxyuridine). Since initiating knockdown of let-92 and paa-1 at L1 prevented maturation past L4, RNAi treatment targeting these genes was delayed until animals had reached L4 on NGM plates seeded with OP50. Worms subjected to heat stress or UV irradiation remained on RNAi plates until they died. For bacterial infection assays, worms were transferred from the RNAi plates at either the L4 stage or at Day 6 of adulthood to plates containing Pseudomonas aeruginosa where they remained throughout the duration of the assay.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA14) infection assays
Infection assays were carried out as described in Tan et al. with the following modifications [45]. For each infection assay replicate worms were cultured on RNAi plates as described above. At L4 and Day 6 at least 30 animals were transferred to each of three slow kill assay 3.5 cm plates containing 25 μg/mL FUdR. These plates had been seeded with 6 μl of an overnight culture of P. aeruginosa strain PA14, incubated for one night at 37°C and then incubated a second night at room temperature prior to the start of the infection assay. Infections of wildtype N2 animals were carried out at 25˚C, and infections of daf-16(mgDf47) mutants were performed at 20˚C. Worm survival was scored in the morning and evening every day by counting the number of animals that responded to gentle prodding with a wire pick. Worms that failed to move were scored as dead and removed from the plates at each time point.
Thermotolerance assay
After being synchronized by sodium hypochlorite treatment as described above, L1 larvae were dropped on to RNAi plates seeded with a clone expressing dsRNA to target a given gene of interest. Worms were maintained on those plates until the L4 larval stage when they were split into two groups. The first group of worms was subjected to thermal stress as described previously with some modifications [12]. Briefly, approximately 100 L4 worms were distributed evenly between three pre-seeded 3.5 cm RNAi food plates containing FUdR and then incubated at 35°C for the duration of the heat treatment and scored every few hours for survival with animals being counted as alive if they responded to gentle prodding with a wire pick. The second group of worms, consisting of ~2000 animals, was divided among three 6 cm pre-seeded RNAi + FUdR plates by chunking and were maintained at 20˚C. At the sixth day of adulthood, ~100 of these animals were subjected to heat stress according to the same procedure as outlined above for L4 thermal stress assays.
UV irradiation assay
Synchronized groups of worms were cultured on RNAi plates beginning at the L1 larval stage. Worms were maintained on those plates until the L4 larval stage when they were split into two groups. The first group of approximately 100 worms was distributed among three 3.5 cm pre-seeded RNAi + FUdR plates for UV treatment. Plates were placed in an irradiator (UV Stratalinker® 1800, Stratagene) with lids removed and were irradiated with 1000 J/m2 UV. Following treatment worms were maintained at 20°C and scored for survival daily until all animals had died. Worms were scored as alive if they responded to gentle prodding with a wire pick. The remaining second group of L4 larval worms were transferred to RNAi + FUdR plates by chunking and were maintained at 20°C until they reached Day 6 of adulthood when they were subjected to the same UV treatment and scoring regimen.
Fluorescence microscopy
Images of Plys-7::GFP expression in C. elegans were taken at Day 6 on a Nikon Eclipse E800 equipped with a Jenoptik digital camera. Worms were immobilized on agar pads using polybead® polystyrene 0.10μm microspheres (Polysciences, Inc.), and pictures were taken quickly thereafter to avoid undo stress. Transgenic animals expressing Plys7::gfp were assigned to one of three categories based on the relative GFP expression levels (low, medium, and high) according to the following criteria: low—overall weak expression of GFP in the intestine or GFP expression limited to anterior of intestine, just behind the pharynx; medium—bright GFP expression from the anterior intestine to the midbody but little to no expression in posterior intestine; high—robust GFP expression throughout the entire length of intestine. The percentage GFP expression for each sample was calculated using a minimum of 200 animals and then the percentages were averaged across at least 3 biological replicates.
Statistical analyses
To calculate median lifespans (LT50s) a three parameter sigmoidal curve was fit to plots of survival (fraction of worms alive versus time) according to the general equation y = a/(1+e(-(x-x0)/b)) using SigmaPlot version 14 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). This equation was used to determine the point at which 50% of the animals in the assay had died. The average fold difference between the LT50 of mutant strains or experimental RNAi treatments and control animals was calculated, and the statistical significance of that difference was assessed across all three replicates using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Results
In silico analysis of the C. elegans PP2A/4/6 phosphoprotein phosphatases
In both yeast and mammals significant structural and functional similarities between members of the PP2A/4/6 family of phosphoprotein phosphatases exist. In addition, proteomic and smaller scale biochemical studies have revealed non-canonical associations between subunits of the holoenzyme complexes [37, 46, 47]. To ask how the PP2A/4/6 proteins in C. elegans compare to their human counterparts we first took an in silico approach. Alignments of the sequences of the three human catalytic subunits PP2Ac, PP4c and PP6c with their C. elegans orthologs revealed that with the exception of their extreme N-terminal sequences, there is strong homology between them throughout their length (Fig 1; S1 Fig; S1 Table). For example, LET-92 and PPH-4.1 are both more than 80% identical to PP2Ac and PP4c, respectively. Key structural motifs and regulatory residues are especially well-conserved both within catalytic subunits of the PP2A/4/6 family and across species. Notably the YFL tripeptide at the C-terminus that is characteristic of PP2Ac-like phosphatases in many species and that may be a site of regulatory post-translational modifications is conserved in C. elegans. Both the helix switch and loop switch regions that are required for the binding of the regulatory protein α4 to PP2Ac in mammals also appear to be present within all catalytic subunits of the PP2A/4/6 family in C. elegans. Based on these similarities, we anticipated that our studies would demonstrate significant parallels between these phosphatases in worms and humans.
We next asked whether C. elegans PP2A/4/6 proteins were expected to associate with the same binding partners as their human orthologs in vivo. To answer this question we performed database searches, using SMK-1 and PPH-4.1 as representative subunits for our analyses. We first used Wormbase to compile a list of PPH-4.1 interactors (S2 Table). Drawing mainly from biochemically verified associations, high throughput yeast two-hybrid data, and interaction networks generated in silico, this list captures a broad spectrum of potential interactors. Included among them are not only proteins that could be members of a trimeric complex along with PPH-4.1 but also regulators, functional analogs, and possible substrates that may be dephosphorylated by PPH-4.1. In addition to SMK-1, two other worm homologs of PP4 regulatory subunits, PPFR-1 and PPFR-2, were included as potential PPH-4.1 interactors. The only other worm orthologue of a PP4 regulatory subunit, F46C5.6, was absent from the list of PPH-4.1 interactors found on Wormbase. Both orthologs of the yeast Tip41p-Tap42p regulatory system that modulates all members of the PP2A/4/6 family were identified as PPH-4.1 interactors, namely PPFR-4 and ZK688.9, orthologous to mammalian ⍺4 and TIPRL, respectively. One other notable potential PPH-4.1 interactor is PPH-6, which encodes the C. elegans orthologue of PP6c, the catalytic subunit of the related but distinct PP6 complex. When we compared the list of potential PPH-4.1 interactors with the list of proteins predicted by Wormbase to interact with SMK-1, we expected to find significant overlap, especially among orthologues of the PP4 complex. Instead, although PPH-4.1 was listed as an interactor of SMK-1 the only other potential PP4 complex member that was in common to the list of interactors for both PPH-4.1 and SMK-1 was the regulatory subunit PPFR-1 (S3 Table).
To gain further insight into the possible relationships between SMK-1, PPH-4.1, and their potential binding partners, we performed interaction network analysis using Genemania. All homologues of the PP2A/4/6 family earmarked as possible interactors of PPH-4.1 or SMK-1 on Wormbase along with the modulator PPFR-4 were included. This analysis yielded additional putative PPH-4.1 interactors (S2 Fig). Among these were PAA-1 and Y71H2AM.20, C. elegans orthologues of human PR65⍺/PR65β and PTPA, respectively. This was surprising because in human cells these proteins associate with PP2c, the catalytic subunit of the PP2 complex, and not the PP4 complex. Specifically, PR65⍺/PR65β are scaffolding units of the PP2 complex, and PTPA has been shown to modify the catalytic site of the PP2c enzyme [48–50]. This raises the intriguing possibility that certain subunits may associate with both a PP4c-containing complex and with PP2A complexes in C. elegans, a scenario that is supported by biochemical evidence in mammalian systems [37, 46].
Taken together, our database queries led to the unexpected finding that C. elegans orthologs of proteins not only of the PP4 complex but also of canonical subunits of the PP2A and PP6 holoenzyme complexes could potentially associate with SMK-1 and PPH-4.1. This lent credence to our experimental strategy of considering all C. elegans orthologs of the entire PP2A/4/6 family so that evidence supporting putative novel interactions between subunits in the context of aging would not be missed. Our database searches also revealed that evolutionarily conserved proteins that act to regulate the PP2A/4/6 holoenzymes by affecting the assembly of the complexes or by manipulating the active site of the catalytic subunit may also be binding partners of PPH-4.1.
Separate from posttranslational modifications of the PP2A/4/6 family catalytic subunits that influence their affinity for specific regulatory subunits, the catalytic activity of the enzymes is in parallel regulated by the evolutionarily conserved Tip41-Tap42 system. Constituents of this regulatory module may form transient or stable associations with PP2A/4/6 proteins. Originally identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, both the Tip 41 and Tap 42 proteins function in the TORC pathway [51, 52]. Specifically, Tip41p antagonizes TORC by inhibiting Tap42, a negative regulator of the PP2A-related phosphatase Sit4p that dephosphorylates TORC substrates. In this manner Tip41p functions to activate PP2A-like catalysis by opposing Tap42. The mammalian ortholog of Tip41p, called TIPRL, on the other hand, cooperates with ⍺4 (mammalian Tap42p) to promote mTORC activity by inhibiting the PP2A/4/6 phosphatases [38]. In particular TIPRL and ⍺4 together bind to holoenzymes and displace metal ions from the active site of the catalytic subunit to produce a latent yet stable complex. Catalytic activity of such decommissioned enzymes can be restored by PTPA, which reloads the metal ions back into position [53]. C. elegans orthologs of all three of these proteins came up in our database searches for PPH-4.1 interactors. Since one of the objectives of our study was to uncover functional evidence that might implicate physical associations between proteins we therefore elected to include them as part of our functional analyses. In total we characterized 20 genes including each C. elegans ortholog of human PP2A/4/6 subunits along with orthologs of the regulatory proteins TIPRL, ⍺4 and PPTA (Table 1). The names of all human genes encoding catalytic, regulatory, or scaffolding constituents of PP2A/4/6 subfamily complexes as well as genes encoding proteins that regulate the phosphatases through physical associations are listed along with their C. elegans orthologs in Table 1.
Table 1. C. elegans orthologs of human PP2A/4/6 holoenzyme subunits and regulatory proteins.
H. sapiens | C. elegans | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complex | Subunits | Gene | Protein | Gene | Protein |
PP2A | Catalytic | PPP2CA | Ppp2c⍺/PP2Ac⍺ | let-92 | LET-92 |
PPP2CB | Ppp2cα/PP2Acα | ||||
Scaffolding | PPP2R1A | A⍺/PR65⍺ | paa-1 | PAA-1 | |
PPP2R1B | Aα/PR65α | ||||
B/B55 regulatory | PPP2R2A | PR55⍺/B⍺ | sur-6 | SUR-6 | |
PPP2R2B | PR55α/Bα | ||||
PPP2R2C | PR55ɣ/Bɣ | ||||
PPP2R2D | PR55δ/Bδ | ||||
B'/B56 regulatory | PPP2R5A | B'⍺/B56⍺/PR61⍺ | pptr-1 | PPTR-1 | |
PPP2R5B | B'α/B56α/PR61α | ||||
PPP2R5C | B'ɣ/B56ɣ/PR61ɣ | pptr-2 | PPTR-2 | ||
PPP2R5D | B'δ/B56δ/PR61δ | ||||
PPP2R5E | B'ε/B56ε/PR61ε | pptr-1 | PPTR-1 | ||
B'' regulatory | PPP2R3A | B''⍺/PR72 | T22D1.5 | T22D1.5 | |
PPP2R3B | B''α/PR70/PR48 | F43B10.1 | F43B10.1 | ||
PPP2R3C | B''ɣ/G5PR | rsa-1 | RSA-1 | ||
B‴/striatin regulatory | STRN/PPP2R6A | B‴⍺/STRN | cash-1 | CASH-1 | |
STRN3/PPP2R6B | B‴α/STRN/SG2NA | ||||
STRN4/PPP2R6C | B‴ɣ/STRN4 | n/a | n/a | ||
PP4 | Catalytic | PPP4C | Ppp4c/PP4/PPX | pph-4.1 | PPH-4.1 |
pph-4.2 | PPH-4.2 | ||||
Regulatory | PPP4R1 | PP4R1 | ppfr-1 | PPFR-1 | |
PPP4R2 | PP4R2 | ppfr-2 | PPFR-2 | ||
PPP4R3⍺ | Ppp4R3⍺ | smk-1 | SMK-1 | ||
PPP4R3α | Ppp4R3α | n/a | n/a | ||
PPP4R4 | PP4R4 | F46C5.6 | F46C5.6 | ||
PP6 | Catalytic | PPP6C | Ppp6c/PP6 | pph-6 | PPH-6 |
Regulatory | PPP6R1 | Ppp6R1/PP6R1 | saps-1 | SAPS-1 | |
PPP6R2 | Ppp6R2/PP6R2 | ||||
PPP6R3 | Ppp6R3/PP6R3 | ||||
ANKRD28 | PP6-ARS-A/PPP1R65 | n/a | n/a | ||
ANKRD44 | PP6-ARS-B | ||||
ANKRD52 | PP6-ARS-C | ||||
PP2A/4/6 activating or inactivating proteins | ⍺4/IGBP | ⍺4/IGBP | ppfr-4 | PPFR-4 | |
TIPRL | TIPRL | ZK688.9 | ZK688.9 | ||
PPP2R4/PTPA | PTPA/PR53 | Y71H2AM.20 | Y71H2AM.20 |
Functional characterization of SMK-1 during aging
To investigate the PP2A/4/6 family of protein phosphatases during aging in C. elegans we began by studying the PP4 complex. We chose to focus on the SMK-1 regulatory subunit in particular as a test case to validate our experimental approach based on reverse genetics because direct binding between SMK-1 and the catalytic subunit PPH-4.1 had been demonstrated in vitro with recombinant proteins [14].
In light of this connection, we expected that if SMK-1 functions as part of a PP4 complex in adult animals, RNAi knockdown of smk-1, pph-4.1, and potentially other constituent subunits of the complex should all result in similar if not identical phenotypes. Moreover, if a SMK-1/PPH-4.1-containing PP4 complex regulates DAF-16 during aging then RNAi targeting subunits of that complex should phenocopy RNAi targeting daf-16. Our strategy was to first compile a set of phenotypes attributable to smk-1 inhibition in adult animals. These phenotypes would then generate a metric to which other genes encoding C. elegans orthologs of human PP4 complex members could be compared to determine the likelihood of them cooperating to produce the same output, including regulating the age-dependent increase in transcriptional activity of DAF-16. Further, functional evidence indicating that particular subunits act together would imply that they associate with each other in vivo. We anticipated that the same comparative analysis could be applied to putative constituents of the PP2A and PP6 complexes to determine whether they might also function during aging in C. elegans. Because we were interested in characterizing the SMK-1/PPH-4.1-containing complex in the context of aging, we conducted all of our studies on adult worms at Day 6 of adulthood when DAF-16 is transcriptionally active in parallel to control L4 larval stage animals [54]. A two-tiered panel of assays was applied to evaluate the function of SMK-1 during aging. First, we asked whether SMK-1 is necessary for the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 in adult C. elegans by examining the expression of an in vivo reporter of DAF-16 activity, Plys-7::GFP in animals treated with RNAi targeting smk-1. We then functionally characterized smk-1 by assessing its contribution to the ability of animals to resist acute environmental insults including bacterial infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA14), exposure to elevated temperature, and irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light. In each stress assay, the phenotype resulting from smk-1 knockdown was compared to the effect of knocking down daf-16.
We expected that if SMK-1 is necessary for the function of DAF-16 during adulthood, just as it is in the daf-2(e1370) mutant background, then RNAi targeting either smk-1 or daf-16 would have similar consequences. With minor exceptions, this is what we found. After initiating RNAi to knockdown smk-1 or daf-16 at the L1 larval stage, we first monitored the expression of the Plys7::gfp reporter over time by fluorescence microscopy (Fig 2A). Compared to worms at the L4 larval stage, the expression of GFP driven by the promoter of lys-7 in the intestines was substantially higher in Day 6 adults, consistent with an age-dependent increase in the transcriptional activity of DAF-16. In examining a population of animals we were able to assign individuals to one of three categories based on their GFP expression pattern (Fig 2A). In general, we observed robust and uniform GFP expression along the length of the intestine among the majority of individuals in a synchronized population of Day 6 adults. These animals were scored as “high” GFP expressers. However, in a proportion of animals high levels of GFP expression were primarily confined to a few anterior intestinal cells with progressively weaker GFP expression in more posterior cells. Animals with this pattern of GFP expression were classified as “medium” GFP expressers. An even smaller fraction of worms expressed low levels of intestinal GFP that was frequently difficult to detect. RNAi targeting daf-16 or smk-1 had no effect on expression levels of the Plys7::gfp reporter in L4 larvae. By Day 6 of adulthood, however, daf-16 knockdown resulted in a significant decrease in GFP expression (Fig 2B). This suggests that DAF-16 becomes activated in an age-dependent manner, consistent with previous studies [8–10]. Recapitulating our prior observations, knocking down smk-1 also resulted in decreased reporter expression in Day 6 adults (Fig 2B), and so together our results indicate that the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 during aging in non-stressed wildtype animals may be regulated by SMK-1.
Continuing to examine the parallels between the function of SMK-1 under low IIS conditions and during normal aging, we next asked whether SMK-1 is required to confer resistance to environmental stress in adult C. elegans. SMK-1 expression was inhibited by RNAi, and the ensuing effect on the ability of L4 larvae and Day 6 adult C. elegans to resist environmental stress was assessed by measuring the survival of animals challenged with an acute insult. While RNAi targeting smk-1 mildly enhanced the susceptibility of L4 larvae to P. aeruginosa infection, it had a more substantial impact on pathogen susceptibility during adulthood, reducing the median lifespan of infected Day 6 adult animals to almost half that of untreated controls (Fig 2C and 2D). This was comparable to the effect of knocking down daf-16 on the resistance of adult animals and corroborates our previous results (Fig 2D and [10]). The age-dependency of phenotypes resulting from smk-1 knockdown became even more apparent when RNAi-treated worms were subjected to UV radiation. Similar to when daf-16 was targeted by RNAi, smk-1 knockdown shortened the survival of C. elegans irradiated at Day 6 of adulthood, but it was inconsequential for animals irradiated as L4 larvae (Fig 2E and 2F). Examining the thermotolerance of RNAi-treated worms by warming them to 35˚C revealed that unlike daf-16, smk-1 is not important for thermotolerance in either L4 larvae or Day 6 adults, consistent with the role of SMK-1 in daf-2(e1370) mutants (Fig 2G and 2H and [12, 13]). The results of our stress assays demonstrate that like DAF-16, SMK-1 contributes to stress resistance in an age-dependent manner and that it is important for the innate immunity and protection from UV radiation in adult C. elegans. The phenotypic similarities resulting from the knockdown of either gene suggests that their products may function within the same pathway.
Putative subunits of the PP4 and PP2A complexes influence the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 in adult C. elegans
To expand our analyses to include all putative subunits of the PP4 complex and, in fact, to the entire PP2A/4/6 family, we first surveyed the effect of knocking down each gene individually on the age-dependent increase in Plys7::gfp expression (Fig 3). RNAi treatments that resulted in greater than 25% of worms being assigned to the low GFP expression category were considered to function in a similar manner to SMK-1 to regulate the activity of DAF-16. None of the genes that we tested had a significant effect on the expression of the Plys7::gfp reporter in L4 larvae (Fig 3A). At Day 6, knockdown of the PP4 catalytic subunit pph-4.1 and its paralog pph-4.2 had some of the strongest effects on GFP expression, resulting in a higher proportion of worms in the low expressing category, similar to the effect of knocking down smk-1 (Fig 3B). This result was expected since SMK-1 and PPH-4.1/PPH-4.2 associate in vivo [13, 14]. RNAi targeting F46C5.6 and ppfr-2, C. elegans homologues of two other PP4 regulatory subunits, also modestly increased the proportion of worms expressing low levels of GFP, yet this effect was not statistically significant. Notably, inhibiting the expression of several worm homologues of PP2 complex members also suppressed the age-dependent increase in plys7::gfp expression. Inhibition of pptr-1, sur-6, T22D1.5, paa-1, and F43B10.1 all resulted in an increase in low levels of GFP expression at Day 6 relative to control animals. It bears mentioning that in our initial attempts to knock down the PP2A complex orthologs let-92 and paa-1 starting at the L1 larval stage we observed developmental phenotypes, and so for the plys-7::gfp expression assay and for the functional assays described below, we allowed animals to reach the L4 larval stage before treating them with RNAi targeting let-92 or paa-1. In addition to genes encoding orthologs of PP4 and PP2A complex subunits, one other gene that was found to be necessary for the age-dependent increase in plys-7::GFP is Y71H2AM.20, the C. elegans ortholog of the regulatory protein PTPA. These results suggest that SMK-1 and PPH-4.1 function together in adult C. elegans, and they imply roles for both the PP4 and PP2A complexes in regulating the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 during aging.
Members of the PP2A/4/6 subfamily contribute to innate immunity during aging
We found that smk-1 is necessary to confer resistance to bacterial infection in Day 6 adults, as is DAF-16 (Fig 2D). This result leads to the prediction that pph-4.1, encoding the catalytic subunit of the PP4 complex, is also required for host defense during aging. Further, based on the results of our in vivo reporter assay for DAF-16 transcriptional activity, we wondered whether PP2A subunits may also function in innate immunity later in life. We addressed these possibilities as part of our characterization of the PP2A/4/6 family in adults challenged with P. aeruginosa. In a phenotype reminiscent of the smk-1 knockdown, RNAi targeting homologues of the PP4 catalytic subunit pph-4.1 or its paralog pph-4.2 reduced the ability of Day 6 adults to resist bacterial infection but had no effect on the susceptibility of L4 larvae to pathogen (Fig 4A, 4B, 4G and 4H). The magnitude of the resulting decrease in median lifespan (LT50) of infected animals caused by inhibiting pph-4.2 expression was comparable to the effect of smk-1 knockdown, but RNAi targeting pph-4.1 had a considerably milder effect across our replicates (Table 2). Coupled with the results of our in vivo reporter assay, this result represents a second independent circumstance in which RNAi inhibition of smk-1 phenocopied the knockdown of pph-4.1/4.2. We also considered it as providing validation to our experimental approach since our functional analyses confirmed biochemically verified interactions between SMK-1 and PPH-4.1/4.2.
Table 2. Summary of phenotypes resulting from knockdown of members of the PP2A/4/6 family and their regulators in wildtype N2 C. elegans.
P. aeruginosa Infection | Heat Stress | UV Irradiation | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L4 | Day 6 | L4 | Day 6 | L4 | Day 6 | ||||||||
Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | ||
PP2A | let-92 | NA | NA | 0.746 | 2.7E-01 | NA | NA | 0.866 | 1.8E-01 | NA | NA | 0.605 | 1.4E-02 |
paa-1* | NA | NA | 0.897 | 4.7E-01 | NA | NA | 0.802 | 1.5E-01 | NA | NA | 0.767 | 2.5E-02 | |
pptr-1* | 0.949 | 2.7E-01 | 0.809 | 1.1E-01 | 0.940 | 2.5E-01 | 0.866 | 1.9E-01 | 0.909 | 7.5E-01 | 0.620 | 9.1E-03 | |
sur-6* | 0.913 | 4.3E-01 | 0.784 | 1.3E-02 | 0.822 | 3.5E-01 | 0.861 | 7.4E-03 | 1.192 | 3.2E-01 | 0.836 | 3.8E-01 | |
cash-1 | 1.057 | 4.7E-01 | 1.054 | 6.4E-01 | 1.131 | 6.2E-01 | 1.015 | 6.5E-01 | 0.846 | 2.9E-01 | 0.858 | 3.4E-01 | |
pptr-2 | 0.966 | 3.3E-01 | 0.881 | 4.2E-01 | 0.949 | 5.9E-01 | 0.921 | 3.5E-01 | 0.984 | 9.2E-01 | 0.958 | 7.4E-01 | |
rsa-1 | 1.014 | 7.1E-01 | 1.150 | 3.9E-01 | 0.937 | 6.1E-01 | 1.111 | 2.4E-01 | 2.664 | 4.5E-01 | 1.005 | 7.4E-01 | |
F43B10.1* | 0.912 | 1.2E-01 | 0.906 | 6.5E-02 | 0.979 | 8.9E-01 | 1.022 | 6.4E-01 | 0.933 | 6.5E-01 | 0.977 | 6.9E-01 | |
T22D1.5* | 1.055 | 6.3E-01 | 0.941 | 6.1E-01 | 1.053 | 6.9E-01 | 1.075 | 4.4E-01 | 0.911 | 5.4E-01 | 1.090 | 3.8E-01 | |
PP4 | pph-4.1* | 0.991 | 8.5E-01 | 0.922 | 2.5E-02 | 0.850 | 1.7E-03 | 1.057 | 4.6E-01 | 0.959 | 8.8E-01 | 0.915 | 5.5E-01 |
pph-4.2* | 0.898 | 1.5E-01 | 0.526 | 8.6E-03 | 0.922 | 3.7E-01 | 0.954 | 4.4E-01 | 0.756 | 3.7E-01 | 0.869 | 2.9E-01 | |
smk-1* | 0.887 | 4.7E-04 | 0.570 | 1.7E-10 | 0.985 | 6.3E-01 | 0.904 | 1.3E-01 | 0.878 | 8.2E-02 | 0.707 | 9.8E-04 | |
ppfr-2 | 0.987 | 7.9E-01 | 0.886 | 4.0E-02 | 1.252 | 4.2E-01 | 1.200 | 2.3E-01 | 1.457 | 3.1E-01 | 1.016 | 9.0E-01 | |
ppfr-1 | 0.995 | 9.1E-01 | 0.950 | 1.3E-01 | 1.017 | 1.3E-01 | 0.788 | 4.6E-01 | 1.753 | 4.1E-01 | 1.037 | 6.5E-01 | |
F46C5.6 | 0.972 | 7.9E-01 | 1.083 | 6.0E-01 | 1.270 | 4.2E-01 | 1.269 | 3.3E-02 | 0.925 | 6.0E-01 | 1.164 | 4.3E-01 | |
PP6 | pph-6 | 1.009 | 7.6E-01 | 0.585 | 1.5E-02 | 1.100 | 1.8E-02 | 0.725 | 1.6E-01 | 0.806 | 3.4E-01 | 0.780 | 8.9E-02 |
saps-1 | 1.037 | 4.1E-01 | 0.563 | 2.4E-02 | 1.024 | 8.5E-01 | 0.948 | 2.1E-01 | 0.917 | 6.1E-01 | 0.855 | 3.0E-01 | |
Regulators | Y71H2AM.20* | 1.060 | 2.3E-01 | 0.771 | 1.1E-01 | 1.376 | 1.8E-01 | 0.905 | 1.6E-01 | 1.002 | 1.0E+00 | 0.831 | 2.0E-01 |
ppfr-4 | 1.098 | 3.8E-02 | 0.843 | 2.4E-01 | 0.989 | 4.5E-01 | 0.929 | 2.4E-01 | 2.106 | 3.8E-01 | 0.674 | 5.5E-02 | |
ZK688.9 | 0.990 | 8.9E-01 | 0.909 | 4.9E-01 | 1.218 | 3.6E-01 | 1.115 | 1.9E-01 | 0.926 | 7.3E-01 | 1.152 | 1.1E-01 |
* denotes genes that are required for the increase in Plys-7::GFP expression at Day 6. Average relative LT50 was calculated by dividing the average LT50 of RNAi-treated animals in a given stress assay by the average LT50 of age-matched control animals in that same assay and thus represents the proportional increase or decrease in median lifespan under stressful conditions that are attributable to RNAi inhibition of the gene of interest. The average relative LT50 values corresponding to knockdowns that decreased or increased median lifespan after exposure to stress by more than 10% compared to empty vector control are shaded in orange and blue, respectively. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test, with a threshold of p<0.05. p-values associated with significant susceptibility and resistance are bolded.
Along with pph-4.1/4.2 and smk-1, RNAi inhibition of another PP4 regulatory subunit homologue, ppfr-2 (PP4R2 in humans), also reduced the median lifespan of worms infected at Day 6 of adulthood but had no effect on the ability of L4 larvae to resist infection (Fig 4A, 4B, 4G and 4H). No other PP4 regulatory subunits were found to be required for innate immunity in Day 6 adults (Fig 4H; S3 Fig). These results imply that PPFR-2 may act in conjunction with SMK-1 and PPH-4.1 to protect adult C. elegans from bacterial pathogens.
We found genes encoding putative subunits of other protein phosphatase complexes to also be important for host defense in adult C. elegans. In addition to the effect of inhibiting the expression of PP4 subunits, one of the ten RNAi treatments directed against C. elegans orthologs of PP2A subunits enhanced the susceptibility of adult animals to P. aeruginosa infection. Knockdown of sur-6, the sole worm homolog of human PP2A B/B55 regulatory subunits, significantly reduced the median lifespan of infected Day 6 adults but had no effect on larvae (Fig 4C, 4D, 4G and 4H; Table 2). We found no evidence of a role for other orthologs of PP2A complex subunits in adult or larval innate immunity (Fig 4H; S4 Fig). In an unexpected result, inhibiting the expression of two orthologues of PP6 complex members pph-6, the catalytic subunit, and saps-1, a regulatory subunit, accelerated the rate of death from infection when worms were challenged with P. aeruginosa at Day 6 of adulthood but not at the L4 larval stage (Fig 4E, 4F, 4G and 4H). This was surprising because none of the PP6 members appear to be required for the increased expression of plys7::gfp in adults, a departure from smk-1-like phenotypes (Fig 3B). Taken together, our results indicate that the entire PP2A/4/6 family plays a role in innate immunity during aging and that the PP6 complex may do so without influencing the transcriptional output of DAF-16.
SMK-1 and the PP2A complex confer UV resistance in postreproductive C. elegans
We found SMK-1 to be important not only for host defense in Day 6 animals, but also for resistance to ultraviolet irradiation, consistent with its role in daf-2(e1370) mutants (Fig 2F; Table 2) [12, 55]. We therefore expected that other components of the PP4 complex would be required for survival upon exposure to UV light during aging. This was not the case. No canonical members of the PP4 holoenzyme, including the catalytic subunits, seem to contribute to UV tolerance in C. elegans, as knocking them down did not affect the survival of irradiated L4 larvae or Day 6 adults (Fig 5A, 5B, 5G and 5H; S5 Fig). On the other hand, inhibiting expression of the PP2A catalytic subunit, let-92, the scaffolding protein paa-1 and the regulatory subunit pptr-1 caused Day 6 adult animals exposed to UV light to die more rapidly, leading to significant reductions in their median lifespans (Fig 5C, 5D, 5G and 5H; Table 2). Other orthologs of PP2A subunits do not appear to play a role in conferring resistance to UV light (S6 Fig). Targeting PP6 complex subunits by RNAi was also inconsequential to the ability of adults to resist UV irradiation (Fig 5E, 5F, 5G and 5H; S7 Fig). Our data therefore suggest that a complete PP2A holoenzyme is involved in the ability of post-reproductive animals to resist UV exposure and that it may act in conjunction with SMK-1.
The PP2A regulatory subunit SUR-6 promotes resistance to heat stress in adult worms
Despite its roles in conferring resistance to bacterial pathogens and ultraviolet irradiation, SMK-1 does not contribute to thermotolerance in adult C. elegans even though DAF-16 does (Fig 2G and 2H). Neither of the other two C. elegans orthologs of PP4 regulatory subunits PPFR-1 and PPFR-2 appear to influence survival of heat stressed animals at the larval or adult stages (Fig 6G and 6H; S8 Fig). In like manner, we found no evidence to suggest that the PP4 catalytic subunits PPH-4.1 or PPH-4.2 function to protect animals from thermal stress during aging, although PPH-4.1 confers thermal tolerance to L4 larvae (Fig 6C, 6D, 6G and 6H). RNAi targeting a putative regulatory subunit F46C5.6, the ortholog of PP4R4, resulted in a surprising modest but significant increase in resistance to high temperatures in Day 6 adult worms but not larvae (Fig 6A, 6B, 6G and 6H). On its own this result suggests that in contrast to the roles of other PP4 regulatory subunits, F46C5.6 could function to inhibit the catalytic activity of the PP4 complex in adult animals. Yet considering that there is no corresponding enhanced sensitivity to heat stress upon knockdown of pph-4.1 or pph-4.2 in adults, this scenario seems unlikely.
Out of all of the other members of the PP2A/4/6 family that we tested, only RNAi targeting sur-6, encoding a regulatory subunit of PP2A, reduced the survival of Day 6 adult C. elegans maintained at elevated temperature (Fig 6E, 6F, 6G and 6H). Knockdown of orthologs of the catalytic, regulatory, or scaffolding subunits of PP2A did not affect the survival of adults challenged by thermal stress (Fig 6H; S9 Fig). Although inhibiting pph-6 expression increased the resistance of L4 worms the thermal stress (Fig 6C), this effect did not persist into adulthood (Fig 6D). Upon exposure to high temperature, the survival of Day 6 animals treated with RNAi targeting pph-6 or saps-1 was comparable to the control group, (Fig 6H; S10 Fig). Our data do not implicate a complete PP2A/4/6 holoenzyme as functioning to confer resistance to heat stress during adulthood. However, individual members of the PP2A/4/6 family may influence the response to thermal stress as part of other pathways in an age-specific manner.
DAF-16-dependent and -independent functions of members of the PP2A/4/6 subfamily in adult stress resistance
In our functional analysis of orthologs encoding potential subunits of the PP2A/4/6 complexes in C. elegans, we found a number of genes that, similar to daf-16, appear to be important for the resistance to environmental insults during aging since inhibiting their expression through RNAi shortens the survival of adult animals exposed to acute stress. Many of these same genes that encode PP2A or PP4 subunit orthologs are also important for the age-dependent increase in the expression of the DAF-16 transcriptional reporter, plys-7::GFP, suggesting that their influence on stress resistance may be dependent upon DAF-16. To test this possibility, we revisited our functional analyses, this time targeting genes of interest with RNAi in a daf-16(mgDf47) background. We reasoned that if the function of a given gene is indeed dependent upon DAF-16 then knocking down that gene in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants should not result in an additive phenotype. This would suggest that the product of the candidate gene and DAF-16 function as part of the same linear pathway. On the other hand, RNAi treatments that modify the survival of daf-16(mgDf47) mutants subjected to stress, causing them to die more slowly or more rapidly than untreated daf-16(mgDf47) animals, may indicate that the product of the RNAi target functions as part of a separate, parallel pathway.
In this set of experiments each gene encoding a PP2A/PP4 complex member that we found to protect adult wild type animals from bacterial infection, UV irradiation, or heat stress was knocked down in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants. At the L4 larval stage and at Day 6 of adulthood daf-16(mgDf47) animals subjected to RNAi treatment were challenged with the acute stress to which the targeted genes were found to confer resistance and their survival was measured over time. For consistency, the catalytic subunits of the PP2 and PP4 complexes along with the PP4 regulatory subunit smk-1 were knocked down in all three environmental stress conditions. As in the wildtype background, the effect of knocking down let-92 and paa-1 could only be assessed in adult worms since RNAi had to be initiated at the L4 stage instead of at the L1 stage to avoid aberrant developmental phenotypes.
To improve the resolution of the bacterial infection assay and increase the likelihood of detecting effects of the RNAi treatments on the survival of daf-16(mgDf47) animals, P. aeruginosa infections were conducted at 20˚C instead of 25˚C. Under these conditions, RNAi targeting smk-1 reproducibly and significantly reduced the ability of L4 daf-16 (mgDf47) larvae to resist P. aeruginosa infection (S11 Fig). Yet knocking down other genes encoding putative subunits of the PP4 complex, including the catalytic subunit pph-4.1 and its paralog pph-4.2, had no impact on the survival of infected L4 larvae. smk-1 knockdown also caused Day 6 daf-16(mgDf47) mutants to die more rapidly from bacterial infection (Fig 7A and 7B; Table 3). Previously we showed that there is no additive effect between RNAi targeting smk-1 and a loss-of-function mutation in daf-16 on the pathogen susceptibility of Day 6 adults [10]. The increase in susceptibility to bacterial infection that we observed here is likely attributable to the results of one of the three biological replicates that were used to calculate the average relative LT50. In that particular iteration of the P. aeruginosa infection assay both the median and maximum lifespan of animals treated with smk-1 RNAi were uncharacteristically low, as compared to those metrics of survival for smk-1 RNAi-treated animals in the other two replicates (S12 Fig). RNAi targeting PP4 subunit orthologs pph-4.2 and ppfr-2 had no effect on the survival of infected Day 6 adult daf-16(mgDf47) mutants (Fig 7A and 7B), suggesting that they confer resistance to bacterial infection through the same pathway as daf-16. Surprisingly, knockdown of pph-4.1, the paralog of pph-4.2 encoding the catalytic subunit of PP4, suppressed the enhanced susceptibility phenotype of Day 6 daf-16 (mgDf47) mutants as did knockdown of let-92, the ortholog of the PP2A catalytic subunit, although to a lesser extent. On the other hand, RNAi targeting sur-6, encoding a putative regulatory subunit of the PP2A complex, had the opposite effect and shortened the survival of infected Day 6 daf-16(mgDf47) mutants. These data indicate that certain members of the PP2A and PP4 complexes may have functions in adult innate immunity that are independent of DAF-16. Further, they imply that canonical subunits of the same variety of phosphoprotein phosphatase complex may not always act in concert.
Table 3. Summary of phenotypes resulting from knockdown of members of the PP2A/4/6 family in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants.
P. aeruginosa Infection | Heat Stress | UV Irradiation | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L4 | Day 6 | L4 | Day 6 | L4 | Day 6 | ||||||||
Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | Average relative LT50 | p-Value | ||
daf-16* | 1.029 | 2.6E-01 | 0.979 | 3.9E-01 | 0.971 | 1.6E-01 | 1.039 | 1.8E-01 | 0.853 | 2.1E-01 | 1.137 | 8.3E-02 | |
PP2A | let-92 | NA | NA | 1.261 | 4.9E-02 | NA | NA | 1.371 | 4.7E-02 | NA | NA | 1.203 | 2.1E-01 |
paa-1* | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.061 | 1.2E-01 | |
pptr-1* | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.827 | 9.4E-02 | 0.868 | 2.0E-01 | |
sur-6* | 0.932 | 2.7E-01 | 0.370 | 1.1E-03 | 0.951 | 1.8E-01 | 0.631 | 1.1E-02 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
PP4 | pph-4.1* | 1.048 | 1.5E-01 | 1.419 | 3.5E-03 | 0.997 | 4.7E-01 | 1.261 | 1.4E-02 | 0.845 | 2.2E-01 | 1.183 | 1.6E-01 |
pph-4.2* | 1.042 | 1.4E-01 | 1.120 | 1.1E-01 | 1.074 | 7.3E-02 | 1.123 | 1.0E-01 | 0.892 | 3.1E-01 | 1.123 | 1.6E-01 | |
smk-1* | 0.861 | 1.2E-02 | 0.803 | 1.4E-02 | 0.984 | 2.8E-01 | 1.231 | 6.4E-02 | 0.797 | 1.5E-01 | 0.935 | 2.0E-01 | |
ppfr-2 | 0.952 | 7.5E-02 | 1.119 | 6.4E-02 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
* denotes genes that are required for the increase in Plys-7::GFP expression at Day 6. Average relative LT50 was calculated by dividing the average LT50 of RNAi-treated animals in a given stress assay by the average LT50 of age-matched control animals in that same assay and thus represents the proportional increase or decrease in median lifespan under stressful conditions that are attributable to RNAi inhibition of the gene of interest. The average relative LT50 values corresponding to knockdowns that decreased or increased median lifespan after exposure to stress by more than 10% compared to empty vector control are shaded in orange and blue, respectively. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test, with a threshold of p<0.05. p-values associated with significant susceptibility and resistance are bolded.
In wildtype N2 C. elegans, we found that three genes encoding the subunits to constitute a complete PP2A complex consisting of the catalytic subunit LET-92 along with the regulatory subunit PPTR-1 and the scaffold PAA-1 were required for Day 6 adults to resist ultraviolet irradiation (Fig 5D). smk-1 was also found to play a role in protecting adult animals from UV light, but it was the only gene encoding a putative member of the PP4 complex found to function in this capacity. None of these four genes has an effect on the resistance of wildtype L4 larvae to UV irradiation (S5 and S6 Figs). We found no evidence of an additive effect on the survival of C. elegans irradiated as L4 larvae or at Day 6 of adulthood when RNAi was used to target genes encoding PP2A or PP4 subunits in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants (S13 Fig; Fig 7C and 7D). In all cases the median lifespan of RNAi-treated animals exposed to UV light was statistically equivalent to that of untreated animals. This result suggests that subunits of the PP2A and PP4 complexes that confer resistance to ultraviolet irradiation do so by functioning in the same pathway as DAF-16.
Of the 20 genes encoding orthologs of PP2A/4/6 complex subunits that we characterized in wildtype animals, only sur-6 was found to confer thermotolerance to Day 6 adult C. elegans (Fig 6F and 6H). No other gene encoding a subunit of the PP2A complex, including the catalytic subunit let-92, had an effect on those animals to resist exposure to heat stress. In daf-16(mgDf47) mutants, knockdown of sur-6 resulted in an additive phenotype in an age-dependent manner, causing these animals to be more sensitive to heat as compared to mutants treated with the empty RNAi vector L4440 at Day 6 but not at the L4 larval stage. (Fig 7E and 7F; S14 Fig). In contrast, inhibiting expression of let-92 partially suppressed the enhanced heat sensitivity of daf-16(mgDf47) mutants, as did RNAi targeting pph-4.1. Other RNAi treatments targeting the PP4 complex orthologs smk-1 and pph-4.2 did not result in any significant change in the survival of heat stressed Day 6 daf-16(mgDf47) mutants. Similar to our findings from the bacterial infection assay with daf-16(mgDf47) animals, the results of the heat stress experiment suggest that sur-6, let-92, and pph-4.1 may have daf-16-independent functions in parallel pathways that impact the thermotolerance of adult animals.
Characterization of putative regulators of the PP2A/4/6 family that are not incorporated into the complexes as canonical subunits
In mammals one group of regulatory proteins modulates the function of the entire PP2A/4/6 subfamily of protein phosphatases through mechanisms involving physical interactions and not post-translational modifications. An example of such a protein is α4, which protects the catalytic subunits of the PP2, PP4, and PP6 complexes in humans by inhibiting their ubiquitin-mediated degradation [56]. At the same time, α4 can act as a negative regulator by functioning together with TIPRL. For example, α4 and TIPRL bind noncompetitively to PP2Ac and inactivate it by both expelling metal ions from the active site and displacing the scaffold and regulatory subunits [38]. Conversely, PTPA can reactivate PP2A/4/6 phosphatases by reloading metal ions back in to the active site [53]. Although they are not considered to be constituents of the PP4 holoenzyme, orthologs of all three of these regulators were identified in our database queries as potential interactors of SMK-1/PPH-4.1 (S2 Fig; S2 and S3 Tables). We therefore asked whether they might modulate the PP2A/4/6 family during aging in C. elegans. Since our data indicate that the PP2A/4/6 family is important for resistance to environmental stress in adult animals, we expected that if PPFR-4 and ZK688.9, the orthologs of α4 and TIPRL, respectively, cooperate to inhibit the phosphatases in C. elegans as they do in mammals, then knocking them down would increase the survival of Day 6 adults challenged with acute insults. Further, since PTPA acts antagonistically to α4 and TIPRL in mammals, we anticipated that RNAi targeting its ortholog Y71H2AM.20 would cause Day 6 adults to become more sensitive to stress. While knocking down Y71H2AM.20 did increase the susceptibility of Day 6 adults to bacterial infection and their sensitivity to UV light, neither effect was statistically significant (Table 2; Fig 8E and 8F; S15 and S16 Figs). We found no evidence of a role for Y71H2AM.20 in protecting animals from thermal stress (Fig 8G; S17 Fig). Surprisingly, instead of making adult animals more resistant, when ppfr-4 was targeted by RNAi, Day 6 C. elegans were more sensitive to UV irradiation, yet the effect on the relative median survival of these animals fell just short of the significance threshold (p = 0.0548) (Fig 8A, 8B and 8E; Table 2). The only resistance phenotype that we found to be associated with ppfr-4 knockdown was when L4 animals were challenged with P. aeruginosa but not when adults were infected (Fig 8C, 8D and 8F). Our observations suggest that there may be some differences between the roles of this class of PP2A/4/6 regulators in C. elegans and mammals, but the lack of statistical significance in our data prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions.
Discussion
The FoxO transcription factor DAF-16 is a major longevity determinant in C. elegans. Animals with constitutively active DAF-16 live longer and are more youthful than their wildtype counterparts, suggesting that DAF-16 contributes not only to lifespan but also to healthspan [57]. Accordingly, one category of DAF-16 transcriptional targets are genes that confer resistance to stress, thus shielding animals from long-lasting cellular damage [7]. While exposure to environmental insults induces DAF-16 to upregulate these genes, recent evidence suggests that DAF-16 becomes activated in an age-dependent manner in animals that have not been challenged with a stressor [8, 9]. Since the PP2A/4/6 family of phosphoprotein phosphatases have been implicated in regulating FoxO transcription factors in evolutionarily diverse species [13, 26–29, 31, 33] we asked about their potential role in modulating the activity of DAF-16 in postreproductive adult C. elegans. In metazoans, the PP2A/4/6 family is especially important at the very early stages of life, ensuring the survival and developmental progression of embryos [19, 58, 59]. In addition, these phosphatases orchestrate the development of multiple tissues including bone, adipose, innate immune cells, and neurons [17–19, 60, 61]. Certain other functions of PP2A/4/6 indicate that later in life they contribute to longevity. For example, PP6 suppresses inflammation and can promote autophagy, both of which would preserve normal lifespan [62, 63]. Regulation of IIS components by PP2A is an example of an even more direct connection between the PP2A/4/6 family and aging, since insulin signaling controls lifespan in invertebrates and other animals [1].
To investigate the potential role of the PP2A/4/6 phosphatases in regulating DAF-16 during aging in C. elegans, we used a two-pronged approach where in each branch the phenotype resulting from RNAi knockdown of candidate genes was always compared to the phenotype associated with reduced DAF-16 expression. First we asked whether RNAi-mediated knockdown of genes encoding worm orthologs of human PP2A/4/6 subunits reduced the age-dependent increase in the expression of plys-7::GFP, an in vivo reporter of DAF-16 transcriptional activity. We then challenged RNAi-treated adult animals with three different types of stress to which DAF-16 is known to confer resistance—bacterial infection, heat, and ultraviolet irradiation. Based on this analysis, we identified 9 members of the PP2A/4/6 family that recapitulated daf-16 knockdown phenotypes in at least one of the functional assays. We found that some groups of candidate genes encoding putative subunits of the same phosphoprotein phosphatase complex also phenocopied each other, with RNAi knockdown resulting in statistically significant enhanced susceptibility to the same environmental stressor. This result was interpreted as evidence of a putative association between the gene products as part of the same protein complex, and it is the basis for the identity of the subunits that we propose as constituents of the phosphoprotein phosphatase complexes that contribute to DAF-16-mediated stress-resistance during adulthood (Fig 9). Further, the constituent subunits are known to be expressed together in the same tissues in C. elegans, and colocalization to the same subcellular compartment has been experimentally verified for several (S4 Table).
Our data support the possibility of multiple versions of the PP2A/4/6 complexes that are co-expressed during aging in worms that have specialized and partially overlapping functions in preserving health by conferring resistance to environmental insults (Fig 9). First, we found that let-92, paa-1 and pptr-1 encoding orthologs of the catalytic, scaffolding, and regulatory subunits of the PP2A complex are important for resistance to UV irradiation in Day 6 adult C. elegans, as is daf-16. Our data indicate that paa-1 and pptr-1 are necessary for the age-dependent increase in plys-7::GFP expression suggesting that paa-1 and pptr-1 act in the same pathway as daf-16. Along those lines, genetic analyses in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants suggest that let-92, paa-1, and pptr-1 function in the same pathway as daf-16 to protect adult C. elegans from UV irradiation. At the same time, they indicate that let-92 may have an additional function in parallel to daf-16 to repress both immunity and the response to heat. These functions are likely opposed by DAF-16 since RNAi of let-92 did not affect the ability of adult wildtype animals to resist either bacterial infection or thermal stress. Our observations both confirm and extend previous investigation of the PP2A complex C. elegans and in mammals. For example, in C. elegans PPTR-1 promotes the dephosphorylation of AKT-1 and is required for the extended lifespan and stress resistance phenotypes of daf-2 mutants [33]. These data strongly implicate PP2A as an indirect DAF-16 regulator in C. elegans, but no other PP2A complex members were isolated in the screen for daf-2 suppressors that yielded pptr-1. Our data indicate that LET-92 and PAA-1 could complete that tripartite PP2A complex that regulates DAF-16. Supporting this possibility, mammalian orthologues of the same three PP2A subunits that we identified were found to be binding partners of FoxO3a in HEK293 cells [27]. Therefore, although the specific substrates may differ between C. elegans and mammals, regulation of FoxO transcription factors by PP2A appears to be evolutionarily conserved.
Similar to the effect of inhibiting PPTR-1, loss-of-function mutations in smk-1, encoding a regulatory subunit of the PP4 complex, abrogate daf-2 phenotypes in larvae and young adults, including the elevated expression of DAF-16 transcriptional targets [12]. More recently, RNAi inhibition of the PP4 catalytic subunits pph-4.1 and its paralog pph-4.2 were also found to partially suppress daf-2 [13]. These subunits along with the regulatory subunit PPFR-2 copurify with SMK-1 from wild type, daf-2(e1370) and daf-18 (mg198) animals, strongly suggesting that they form a complex in vivo [13]. Our functional analysis provides independent evidence to suggest this association between PPH-4.1/PPH-4.2, SMK-1 and PPFR-2 to form a PP4 complex in adult C. elegans. Supporting the possibility that pph-4.1, pph-4.2 and smk-1 function in the same pathway as daf-16, each is required for the age-dependent increase in plys-7::GFP. Similar to the effect of knocking down daf-16, RNAi targeting pph-4.1, pph-4.2, smk-1, and ppfr-2 resulted in an increased susceptibility of wildtype Day 6 adult but not L4 larval stage C. elegans to infection by P. aeruginosa. A more severe increase in pathogen susceptibility resulting from pph-4.2 knockdown as compared to pph-4.1 knockdown was the first indication of possible functional divergence between the gene products of these two paralogs. Our functional characterization revealed further phenotypic differences. One is that knocking down pph-4.2 but not pph-4.1 resulted in a mild but statistically insignificant susceptibility to ultraviolet irradiation (Table 2; Fig 5H). Another difference became evident upon knocking down subunits of the PP4 complex in daf-16(mgDf47) mutants. While RNAi targeting pph-4.2 did not modify the stress susceptibility phenotypes daf-16(mgDf47) mutants in any of our assays, knocking down pph-4.1 suppressed the enhanced susceptibility to pathogen and heat stress of Day 6 daf-16 animals. This suggests that pph-4.1 but not pph-4.2 acts in parallel to daf-16 to inhibit innate immunity during adulthood. Considering, however, that pph-4.1 is necessary for the upregulation of lys-7 during adulthood and that knockdown of pph-4.1 in wildtype animals makes Day 6 adults more susceptible to bacterial infection, this function is likely in addition to its role in modulating the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 and it may, in fact, be antagonized by DAF-16.
Along with its role in innate immunity in Day 6 adult animals, we found that smk-1 is also important for conferring resistance to ultraviolet radiation (Fig 5). Curiously, it is the only gene encoding a putative subunit of the PP4 complex in C. elegans that was required for resistance to UV light. RNAi targeting genes encoding other regulatory subunits, pph-4.1 or pph-4.2 had no significant effect on the median lifespan of irradiated adult animals. This observation could be explained by the possibility of subunit exchange between holocomplexes of the PP2A/4/6 family. Said another way, there may be hybrid tripartite holoenzymes where two members that are canonical subunits of one complex (e.g. PP2A) combine with a third member that is considered to be a canonical subunit of a different complex (e.g. PP4). This would require certain regulatory or scaffolding subunits, perhaps including SMK-1, to have the ability to be incorporated into both PP2A and PP4 complexes. Regardless of their specific stoichiometry, biochemical evidence from mammalian systems supports the possibility of interchange of subunits between complexes of the PP2A/4/6 family. In affinity purification or immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells, PP4c has been isolated as part of complexes with PP2A subunits, including orthologs of PAA-1, SUR-6, and PPTR-2 [37, 46, 47]. Interestingly, in C. elegans the PP2A scaffold PAA-1 seems to associate with the PP4 subunit SMK-1 [13]. Perhaps to carry out its role in protecting adult worms from exposure from UV light, SMK-1 is incorporated into an alternative version of the LET-92-containing PP2A complex.
Heterotypic associations between members of the PP2A and PP4 complexes could also explain our observation that sur-6 was the only PP2A subunit whose knockdown resulted in enhanced susceptibility to bacterial infection in Day 6 adult C. elegans, as did RNAi targeting the PP4 complex members pph-4.1/4.2, smk-1, and ppfr-2 (Fig 4). Unlike the canonical PP4 regulatory subunit ppfr-2, we also found sur-6 to be required for the age-dependent increase in DAF-16 transcriptional activity as measured by the increased expression of the plys-7::GFP reporter. This implies that there may be a hybrid form of the PPH-4.1/SMK-1 complex that includes SUR-6 as a subunit when modulating DAF-16 transcriptional activity.
Our data suggest additional functions for the PP2A subunit SUR-6 that are independent of DAF-16. RNAi targeting sur-6 enhanced the susceptibility of Day 6 wildtype C. elegans to infection by P. aeruginosa and to thermal stress and it caused Day 6 daf-16(mgDf47) mutants to die even more rapidly from both of those insults (Fig 7). This suggests that SUR-6 functions independently of DAF-16 in a parallel pathway, yet the results of our plys-7::GFP reporter assay indicate that a possible role for SUR-6 in regulating the transcriptional activity of DAF-16 cannot be excluded.
In the course of characterizing the PP2A/4/6 subfamily in our studies, we uncovered a new role for the PP6 complex in innate immunity during aging in C. elegans. Prior to our work on PPH-6, the C. elegans ortholog of PP6c, it had only been described in the context of development. In worm embryos PPH-6 is required for spindle positioning, similar to the role of its counterpart PP6c in mammals that controls spindle formation and the condensation, alignment, and segregation of chromosomes during mitosis [64–67]. Based on the other functions of PP6c, we expected that PPH-6 might be necessary to protect adult C. elegans from ultraviolet irradiation. PP6c functions in both non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair of DNA, and without it cells are more sensitive to radiation [68, 69]. Despite the reported role for PP6c, we found no evidence to suggest that either PPH-6 or its regulatory subunit SAPS-1 confer resistance to UV in Day 6 animals. Instead, both pph-6 and saps-1 were required for the survival of adult animals challenged with P. aeruginosa. Neither gene was necessary to increase plys-7::GFP expression during aging. In light of the nuclear localization of PPH-6 and SAPS-1, however, we speculate that the PP6 complex in C. elegans could play a role in regulating the expression of immune effectors or detoxifying enzymes to contribute to host defense.
Our work establishes roles for the PP2A, PP4, and PP6 phosphatases in contributing to the healthspan of postreproductive adult C. elegans through conferring resistance to environmental insults at least in part by modulating transcription. The mechanistic basis for this function will be revealed when the substrates of the complexes in aging animals are uncovered. In light of evidence from mammalian systems, during aging in C. elegans the PP2A and PP4 complexes may act to dephosphorylate DAF-16 itself or its upstream inhibitory kinases. Yet if this were true and the phosphatases regulate an early step in DAF-16 activation to counteract inhibition through IIS, we may have expected to find significant functional overlap between the PP2A and PP4 complexes such that both would have conferred resistance to the same stresses. Instead, we found that each complex seems to specialize in contributing to the resistance to particular insults. This suggests that PP2A and PP4 may regulate DAF-16 at a more downstream step, possibly functioning to tailor the transcriptional output of DAF-16 to include only discrete subsets of its complete repertoire of targets. Consistent with this possibility, the transcription elongation factor SPT-5 was recently identified as a substrate of PP4 in daf-2 (e1370) mutants where it plays a role in recruiting RNA PolII to the promoters of some but not all of the genes regulated by DAF-16 [13]. Should the PP2A/4/6 family act at a similar level in adult wildtype animals, there are other means by which its members are known to influence gene expression that may be of particular relevance to aging. Across evolutionarily diverse species, these protein phosphatases regulate histone modification, chromatin organization, and mRNA processing which all undergo significant changes over time [61, 70–76]. Since we and others find that the PP2A/4/6 phosphatases are important for promoting healthspan, it may be by acting through these pathways that the PP2A/4/6 family modulates the changes in gene expression that are necessary to uphold vitality.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jennifer Goldfarb for assistance with data collection. Kali Carrasco and Patrick Mitrano-Towers provided valuable feedback during the preparation of the manuscript. We are grateful to members of the staff of the Villanova Department of Biology for their technical assistance.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature. 2010;467(7315):622–622. 10.1038/nature08980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kenyon CJ, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature; London. 1993;366(6454):461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kenyon C. The Plasticity of Aging: Insights from Long-Lived Mutants. Cell. 2005;120(4):449–60. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guarente L, Kenyon C. Genetic pathways that regulate ageing in model organisms. Nature; London. 2000;408(6809):255–62. 10.1038/35041700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993;366(6454):461–4. 10.1038/366461a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Henderson ST, Johnson TE. daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Current Biology. 2001;11(24):1975–80. 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00594-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tepper RG, Ashraf J, Kaletsky R, Kleemann G, Murphy CT, Bussemaker HJ. PQM-1 Complements DAF-16 as a Key Transcriptional Regulator of DAF-2-Mediated Development and Longevity. Cell. 2013;154(3):676–90. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bansal A, Kwon E-S, Conte D, Liu H, Gilchrist MJ, MacNeil LT, et al. Transcriptional regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans FOXO/DAF-16 modulates lifespan. Longev Healthspan. 2014;3:5 10.1186/2046-2395-3-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li S-T, Zhao H-Q, Zhang P, Liang C-Y, Zhang Y-P, Hsu A-L, et al. DAF-16 stabilizes the aging transcriptome and is activated in mid-aged Caenorhabditis elegans to cope with internal stress. Aging Cell. 2019. June;18(3):e12896 10.1111/acel.12896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McHugh DR, Koumis E, Jacob P, Goldfarb J, Schlaubitz-Garcia M, Bennani S, et al. DAF-16 and SMK-1 Contribute to Innate Immunity During Adulthood in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2020; 10(5):1521–1539. 10.1534/g3.120.401166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dues DJ, Andrews EK, Schaar CE, Bergsma AL, Senchuk MM, Van Raamsdonk JM. Aging causes decreased resistance to multiple stresses and a failure to activate specific stress response pathways. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(4):777–95. 10.18632/aging.100939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolff S, Ma H, Burch D, Maciel GA, Hunter T, Dillin A. SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity. Cell. 2006;124(5):1039–53. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sen I, Zhou X, Chernobrovkin A, Puerta-Cavanzo N, Kanno T, Salignon J, et al. DAF-16/FOXO requires Protein Phosphatase 4 to initiate transcription of stress resistance and longevity promoting genes. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1–17. 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim S-H, Holway AH, Wolff S, Dillin A, Michael WM. SMK-1/PPH-4.1–mediated silencing of the CHK-1 response to DNA damage in early C. elegans embryos. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(1):41–52. 10.1083/jcb.200705182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 15.Wlodarchak N, Xing Y. PP2A as a master regulator of the cell cycle. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2016;51(3):162–84. 10.3109/10409238.2016.1143913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hall ET, Pradhan-Sundd T, Samnani F, Verheyen EM. The protein phosphatase 4 complex promotes the Notch pathway and wingless transcription. Biol Open. 2017;6(8):1165–73. 10.1242/bio.025221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okamura H, Yoshida K, Morimoto H, Teramachi J, Ochiai K, Haneji T, et al. Role of Protein Phosphatase 2A in Osteoblast Differentiation and Function. J. Clin Med. 2017;6(3):23 10.3390/jcm6030023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nematullah M, Hoda Mn, Khan F. Protein Phosphatase 2A: A Double-Faced Phosphatase of Cellular System and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;55(2):1750–1761. 10.1007/s12035-017-0444-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reynhout S, Janssens V. Physiologic functions of PP2A: Lessons from genetically modified mice. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019;1866(1):31–50. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hunt T. On the regulation of protein phosphatase 2A and its role in controlling entry into and exit from mitosis. Adv Biol Regul. 2013;53(2):173–8. 10.1016/j.jbior.2013.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haccard O., Jessus C. Greatwall Kinase, ARPP-19 and Protein Phosphatase 2A: Shifting the Mitosis Paradigm In: Kubiak J., editors. Cell Cycle in Development. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. 10.1007/978-3-642-19065-0_11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sato-Carlton A, Li X, Crawley O, Testori S, Martinez-Perez E, Sugimoto A, et al. Protein Phosphatase 4 Promotes Chromosome Pairing and Synapsis, and Contributes to Maintaining Crossover Competence with Increasing Age. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(10): e1004638 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140(15):3079–93. 10.1242/dev.091744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stefansson B, Ohama T, Daugherty AE, Brautigan DL. Protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunits composed of ankyrin repeat domains. Biochemistry. 2008;47(5):1442–51. 10.1021/bi7022877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kao G, Tuck S, Baillie D, Sundaram M. V. C. elegans SUR-6/PR55 cooperates with LET-92/protein phosphatase 2A and promotes Raf activity independently of inhibitory Akt phosphorylation sites. Development. 2004; 131:755–765; 10.1242/dev.00987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barreyro FJ, Kobayashi S, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Malhi H, Gores GJ. Transcriptional regulation of Bim by FoxO3A mediates hepatocyte lipoapoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(37):27141–54. 10.1074/jbc.M704391200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rinner O, Mueller LNs1, Hubálek M, Müller M, Gstaiger M, Aebersold R, An integrated mass spectrometric and computational framework for the analysis of protein interaction networks. Nature Biotechnol. 2007;25(3):345–52. 10.1038/nbt1289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yan L, Lavin VA, Moser LR, Cui Q, Kanies C, Yang E. PP2A regulates the pro-apoptotic activity of FOXO1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(12):7411–20. 10.1074/jbc.M708083200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Singh A, Ye M, Bucur O, Zhu S, Tanya Santos M, Rabinovitz I, et al. Protein phosphatase 2A reactivates FOXO3a through a dynamic interplay with 14-3-3 and AKT. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;15;21(6):1140–52. 10.1091/mbc.e09-09-0795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Millward TA, Zolnierowicz S, Hemmings BA. Regulation of protein kinase cascades by protein phosphatase 2A. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1999;24(5):186–91. 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01375-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bertoli C, Copetti T, Lam EW-F, Demarchi F, Schneider C. Calpain small-1 modulates Akt/FoxO3A signaling and apoptosis through PP2A. Oncogene. 2009;28(5):721–33. 10.1038/onc.2008.425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Petersen Shay K, Hagen TM. Age-associated impairment of Akt phosphorylation in primary rat hepatocytes is remediated by alpha-lipoic acid through PI3 kinase, PTEN, and PP2A. Biogerontology. 2008;10(4):443 10.1007/s10522-008-9187-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Padmanabhan S, Mukhopadhyay A, Narasimhan SD, Tesz G, Czech MP, Tissenbaum HA. A PP2A regulatory subunit regulates C. elegans insulin/IGF-1 signaling by modulating AKT-1 phosphorylation. Cell. 2009;136(5):939–51. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andreeva AV, Kutuzov MA. PPP Family of Protein Ser/Thr Phosphatases: Two Distinct Branches? Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2001. March 1;18(3):448–52. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu Y, Xing Y, Chen Y, Chao Y, Lin Z, Fan E, et al. Structure of the Protein Phosphatase 2A Holoenzyme. Cell. 2006;127(6):1239–51. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu C-G, Chen H, Guo F, Yadav VK, Mcilwain SJ, Rowse M, et al. PP2A-B′ holoenzyme substrate recognition, regulation and role in cytokinesis. Cell Discov. 2017;3:17027 10.1038/celldisc.2017.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yadav L, Tamene F, Göös H, van Drogen A, Katainen R, Aebersold R, et al. Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Phosphatase Interactions and Dynamics. Cell Systems. 2017;4(4):430–444.e5. 10.1016/j.cels.2017.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wu C-G, Zheng A, Jiang L, Rowse M, Stanevich V, Chen H, et al. Methylation-regulated decommissioning of multimeric PP2A complexes. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1–13. 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo H, Damuni Z. Autophosphorylation-activated protein kinase phosphorylates and inactivates protein phosphatase 2A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(6):2500–4. 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiang L, Stanevich V, Satyshur KA, Kong M, Watkins GR, Wadzinski BE, et al. Structural basis of protein phosphatase 2A stable latency. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1699 10.1038/ncomms2663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brenner S. The Genetics of Caenorhabditis Elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alper S, McBride SJ, Lackford B, Freedman JH, Schwartz DA. Specificity and Complexity of the Caenorhabditis elegans Innate Immune Response. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2007;27(15):5544–53. 10.1128/MCB.02070-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Porta-de-la-Riva M., Fontrodona L., Villanueva A., Cerón J. Basic Caenorhabditis elegans Methods: Synchronization and Observation. J. Vis. Exp. 2012;(64), e4019, 10.3791/4019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Zipperlen P, Martinez-Campos M, Sohrmann M, Ahringer J. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature; London. 2000; 408(6810):325–30. 10.1038/35042517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tan M-W, Mahajan-Miklos S, Ausubel FM. Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Pseudomonas aeruginosa used to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(2):715–20. 10.1073/pnas.96.2.715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen GI, Tisayakorn S, Jorgensen C, D’Ambrosio LM, Goudreault M, Gingras A-C. PP4R4/KIAA1622 Forms a Novel Stable Cytosolic Complex with Phosphoprotein Phosphatase 4. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(43):29273–84. 10.1074/jbc.M803443200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Glatter T, Wepf A, Aebersold R, Gstaiger M. An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system. Molecular Systems Biology. 2009;5(1):237 10.1038/msb.2008.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chao Y, Xing Y, Chen Y, Xu Y, Lin Z, Li Z, et al. Structure and Mechanism of the Phosphotyrosyl Phosphatase Activator. Molecular Cell. 2006;23(4):535–46. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Longin S, Jordens J, Martens E, Stevens I, Janssens V, Rondelez E, et al. An inactive protein phosphatase 2A population is associated with methylesterase and can be re-activated by the phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activator. Biochem J. 2004;380(Pt 1):111–9. 10.1042/BJ20031643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Van Hoof C, Cayla X, Bosch M, Merlevede W, Goris J. The Phosphotyrosyl Phosphatase Activator of Protein Phosphatase 2A. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1994;226(3):899–907. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00899.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jiang Y, Broach JR. Tor proteins and protein phosphatase 2A reciprocally regulate Tap42 in controlling cell growth in yeast. EMBO J. 1999;18(10):2782–92. 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jacinto E, Guo B, Arndt KT, Schmelzle T, Hall MN. TIP41 interacts with TAP42 and negatively regulates the TOR signaling pathway. Mol Cell. 2001;8(5):1017–26. 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00386-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xing Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Stock JB, Jeffrey PD, Shi Y. Structural Mechanism of Demethylation and Inactivation of Protein Phosphatase 2A. Cell. 2008;133(1):154–63. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li J, Ebata A, Dong Y, Rizki G, Iwata T, Lee SS. Caenorhabditis elegans HCF-1 Functions in Longevity Maintenance as a DAF-16 Regulator. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(9). 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Prasanth MI, Santoshram GS, Bhaskar JP, Balamurugan K. Ultraviolet-A triggers photoaging in model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans in a DAF-16 dependent pathway. Age (Dordr). 2016;38(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nanahoshi M, Tsujishita Y, Tokunaga C, Inui S, Sakaguchi N, Hara K, et al. Alpha4 protein as a common regulator of type 2A-related serine/threonine protein phosphatases 1. FEBS Letters. 1999;446(1):108–12. 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00189-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Podshivalova K, Kerr RA, Kenyon C. How a Mutation that Slows Aging Can Also Disproportionately Extend End-of-Life Decrepitude. Cell Reports. 2017;19(3):441–50. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mendoza MC, Du F, Iranfar N, Tang N, Ma H, Loomis WF, et al. Loss of SMEK, a Novel, Conserved Protein, Suppresses mek1 Null Cell Polarity, Chemotaxis, and Gene Expression Defects. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2005;25(17):7839–53. 10.1128/MCB.25.17.7839-7853.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ogoh H, Tanuma N, Matsui Y, Hayakawa N, Inagaki A, Sumiyoshi M, et al. The protein phosphatase 6 catalytic subunit (Ppp6c) is indispensable for proper post-implantation embryogenesis. Mechanisms of Development. 2016;139:1–9. 10.1016/j.mod.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shui J-W, Hu MC-T, Tan T-H. Conditional knockout mice reveal an essential role of protein phosphatase 4 in thymocyte development and pre-T-cell receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(1):79–91. 10.1128/MCB.00799-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lyu J, Kim H-R, Yamamoto V, Choi SH, Wei Z, Joo C-K, et al. Protein phosphatase 4 and Smek complex negatively regulate Par3 and promote neuronal differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells. Cell Rep. 2013;5(3):593–600. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kajino T, Ren H, Iemura S, Natsume T, Stefansson B, Brautigan DL, et al. Protein phosphatase 6 down-regulates TAK1 kinase activation in the IL-1 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(52):39891–6. 10.1074/jbc.M608155200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wengrod J, Wang D, Weiss S, Zhong H, Osman I, Gardner Lb. Phosphorylation of eIF2α Triggered by mTORC1 Inhibition and PP6C Activation Is Required for Autophagy and Is Aberrant in PP6C-mutated Melanoma. Science signaling. 2015;8(367):ra27 10.1126/scisignal.aaa0899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zeng K, Bastos Rn, Barr Fa, Gruneberg U. Protein Phosphatase 6 Regulates Mitotic Spindle Formation by Controlling the T-loop Phosphorylation State of Aurora A Bound to Its Activator TPX2. J. Cell Biol. 2010; 191 (7): 1315–1332. 10.1083/jcb.201008106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Afshar K, Werner ME, Tse YC, Glotzer M, Gönczy P. Regulation of cortical contractility and spindle positioning by the protein phosphatase 6 PPH-6 in one-cell stage C. elegans embryos. Development. 2010;137(2):237–47. 10.1242/dev.042754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kotak S, Afshar K, Busso C, Gönczy P. Aurora A kinase regulates proper spindle positioning in C. elegans and in human cells. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(15):3015–25. 10.1242/jcs.184416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rusin Sf, Ka Schlosser, Me Adamo, An Kettenbach. Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Reveals New Roles for the Protein Phosphatase PP6 in Mitotic Cells. Science signaling. 2015;8(398):rs12 10.1126/scisignal.aab3138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shen Y, Wang Y, Sheng K, Fei X, Guo Q, Larner J, et al. Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 6 modulates the radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2(12):e241–e241. 10.1038/cddis.2011.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kato H, Kurosawa K, Inoue Y, Tanuma N, Momoi Y, Hayashi K, et al. Loss of protein phosphatase 6 in mouse keratinocytes increases susceptibility to ultraviolet-B-induced carcinogenesis. Cancer Letters. 2015;365(2):223–8. 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Carnegie GK, Sleeman JE, Morrice N, Hastie CJ, Peggie MW, Philp A, et al. Protein phosphatase 4 interacts with the Survival of Motor Neurons complex and enhances the temporal localisation of snRNPs. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 10):1905–13. 10.1242/jcs.00409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kamoun M, Filali M, Murray Mv, Awasthi S, Wadzinski Be. Protein Phosphatase 2A Family Members (PP2A and PP6) Associate With U1 snRNP and the Spliceosome During pre-mRNA Splicing. Biochem biophys rescommun. 2013;440(2):306–311. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nakada S, Chen GI, Gingras A-C, Durocher D. PP4 is a gamma H2AX phosphatase required for recovery from the DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 2008;9(10):1019–26. 10.1038/embor.2008.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Frenk S, Houseley J. Gene expression hallmarks of cellular ageing. Biogerontology. 2018;19(6):547–66. 10.1007/s10522-018-9750-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hervera A, Zhou L, Palmisano I, McLachlan E, Kong G, Hutson TH, et al. PP4-dependent HDAC3 dephosphorylation discriminates between axonal regeneration and regenerative failure. EMBO J. 2019;38(13):e101032 10.15252/embj.2018101032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang X, Ozawa Y, Lee H, Wen Y-D, Tan T-H, Wadzinski BE, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity is regulated by interaction with protein serine/threonine phosphatase 4. Genes Dev. 2005;19(7):827–39. 10.1101/gad.1286005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jia S, Dai F, Wu D, Lin X, Xing C, Xue Y, et al. Protein phosphatase 4 cooperates with Smads to promote BMP signaling in dorsoventral patterning of zebrafish embryos. Dev Cell. 2012;22(5):1065–78. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fellner T, Lackner DH, Hombauer H, Piribauer P, Mudrak I, Zaragoza K, et al. A novel and essential mechanism determining specificity and activity of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in vivo. Genes Dev. 2003;17(17):2138–50. 10.1101/gad.259903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.