Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243750

Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu, China

Xiaoqiong Xu 1,2, Tiantian Zhu 1, Tingting Shi 3, Juan Chen 4, Ling Jin 1,5,*
Editor: Vassilis G Aschonitis6
PMCID: PMC7735642  PMID: 33315941

Abstract

The genus Angelica encompasses 80 species worldwide. Among them, only Angelica sinensis is widely used in China and Japan. To explore the quality and geographical distribution of A. sinensis, we collected 1,530 plants from Gansu Province and analyzed them for their contents of chlorogenic acid (CA), ferulic acid (FA), senkyunolide I(SI), senkyunolide A(SA), senkyunolide H (SH), coniferyl ferulate (CF), ligustilide (LI), and butenyl phthalide (BP) using UPLC. We also assessed the relationship between the ecological environment and quality of A. sinensis through maximum entropy modeling and a geographical information system. The habitat suitability distribution demonstrated that the most influential ecological factors for the growth of A. sinensis were altitude, precipitation during March, May, and December, precipitation during the wettest month, and the soil pH. The most suitable areas for cultivation are concentrated to the south of Gansu Province, including Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Dingxi City, Tianshui City, south of Wuwei City, east of Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, north of Longnan City, and northwest of Pingliang City. The quality suitability regionalization analysis divulged that the most influential ecological factors for the index components of A. sinensis were the altitude, sunshine, rainfall, temperature, and soil pH. The highest quality A. sinensis grow in Dingxi City, Tangchang, Lixian, and Wen counties in Longnan City, Wushan County in Tianshui City, Lintan, Zhouqu, and Zhuoni counties in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Kangle and Linxia counties in Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture. The experiment yielded highly accurate results (accuracy of 0.955), suggesting that the results were consistent with the actual distribution of A. sinensis in Gansu. The inferences of this research will naturally draw the attention of the authorities in the fields of natural resources and agriculture departments and provide a scientific basis for the rational selection of A. sinensis cultivation areas.

Introduction

The root of Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (Umbelliferae family) is used as a health supplement and drug in Asian countries and a dietary supplement in women’s care in Europe [13]. A. sinensis has been cultivated in China for more than 2,000 years. The root of this herb is an important traditional Chinese medicine, primarily prescribed for tonifying the blood and treating anemia, rheumatism, and menstrual disorders. This plant is primarily cultivated in the Gansu, Yunnan, Sichuan, Shaanxi, and Hubei Provinces in China [46]. Owing to its high commercial value and large export market, wild A. sinensis has been overharvested. Currently, the cultivated varieties of herbs are preferably used for medicinal purposes. A. sinensis is a typical habitation-dominated medicinal herb. The soil pH, rainfall, temperature, altitude, and other ecological factors greatly influence the active components of A. sinensis [79]. For economic benefits, farmers have blindly expanded the cultivation areas of A. sinensis, even in places where the environment is not suitable for the growth of A. sinensis, which has eventually deteriorated the quality of A. sinensis. Therefore, the relationship between the quality and ecological environment should be established to obtain quality suitability map. In this study, Maxent and ArcGIS techniques have been used for the first time to conduct a regionalization study on the quality of A. sinensis. Using Maxent modeling, we identified the suitable areas in Gansu for cultivating high-quality A. sinensis species and promoting their cultivation in such suitable areas.

Materials and methods

In this article, 1,530 sites were selected for collecting samples. Sampling point informations are listed in S1 Appendix. The contents of CA, FA, SI, SA, SH, CF, LI, and BP were determined. Using MaxEnt, we calculated the growth suitability of A. sinensis and identified suitable cultivation areas. To correlate the quality of the medicinal plants with their growth environment, we analyzed the positive and negative effects of the habitat conditions on plant growth based on the 8 index component accumulation process and prepared a map of quality suitability of A. sinensis in Gansu.

Survey areas and species occurrence records

The survey areas are in Gansu Province, China, at the confluence of the Qinling Mountains, Loess Plateau, and Qinghai-Tibet Plateau with abundant vegetation. The altitude varies between 1,800 and 3,247 m, which lies between 33°58′ N to 38°40′ N latitude and 102°57′ E to 104°30′ E longitude. The survey areas receive an annual average of 36.6–734.9 mm precipitation at an average temperature of 0–15°C. The sub-tropical monsoon season of the study area extends from June to August, followed by a dry season from November to March.

Based on the preliminary study and planting scale of A. sinensis in Gansu, 1,530 cultivated samples of A. sinensis were collected from Dingxi City, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Longnan Prefecture, Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Wuwei City, Tianshui City, Zhangye City, and Lanzhou City between October and November 2018. During the collection process, the latitude, longitude, and habitat information were recorded using a handheld GPS device, and the information on sampling points was stored in the table. All the samples were crushed after drying, sifted, cryopreserved (2–8°C), and later used to determine the 8 index components. According to the principle of uniform representation, the sampling points were spaced approximately 500 to 800 meters apart. Because the index composition changes with the growth duration, the samples are all 3-year-olds, so that the variables are controlled within a reasonable range. Species occurrence records were displayed in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Species occurrence records.

Fig 1

Acquisition and selection of ecological factors

The data of 60 ecological factors, including meteorological data [10], soil type [11], topographical data [12], and vegetation type [13], were collected. A total of 55 continuous variables and 5 categorical variables were analyzed (Table 1). The ecological factor database used in this study has been derived from the "Chinese Medicine Resource Spatial Information Grid Database". The map has been downloaded from the department of natural resources of Gansu Province (http://zrzy.gansu.gov.cn/) (resolution-1:650), Map review number: Gan S(2017)64. The attributes for each sampling point were calculated before analysis using correlation software. Correlation coefficients were calculated among 60 ecological factors, and the ecological factors that contained correlation coefficients that were less than 0.8 were retained. Nine ecological factors fulfilled these requirements.

Table 1. List of the environmental variables used to develop the model.

Code Environmental variables Unit
bio1 Annual Mean Temperature °C
bio2 Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly (max temp—min temp)) °C
bio3 Isothermality (bio 2/bio 7) (* 100) % °C
bio4 Temperature Seasonality (standard deviation *100) °C
bio5 Max Temperature of Warmest Month °C
bio6 Min Temperature of Coldest Month °C
bio7 Temperature Annual Range (bio5-bio6) °C
bio8 Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter °C
bio9 Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter °C
bio10 Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter °C
bio11 Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter mm
bio12 Annual Precipitation mm
bio13 Precipitation of Wettest Month mm
bio14 Precipitation of Driest Month mm
bio15 Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation) 1
bio16 Precipitation of Wettest Quarter mm mm
rz Annual sunshine duration h
altitude Elevation m
index-hi Humidity index mm/°C
index-ci Cold index °C
index-wi Warm index °C
tmean Mean Temperature of Each Month °C
prec Precipitation of Each Month mm
ntl Amount of clay %
yjthl Soil organic carbon content %
pH Soil pH 1

Operation and accuracy of testing by MaxEnt

The sampling information of A. sinensis and 60 ecological factors were added to MaxEnt. A total of 25% of the distribution data were randomly selected as the test set and the rest as the training set [14]. The maximum number of iterations was set as 106, and the convergence threshold was set at 0.00005, while the other parameters were set as the default. These calculations were repeated five times. The contribution of each ecological factor to the growth of A. sinensis was determined. The weight of each climate factor was verified by the Jackknife procedures in MaxEnt. An ROC analysis can evaluate the utility of a model. The area under the curve (AUC) is an effective threshold-independent index to discriminate the presence from absence (or background) [15]. The accuracy of the results is proportional to the AUC value. AUC≥0.9 indicates an excellent performance by the model [16]. The results of the simulation output from MaxEnt software ranged from 0 to 1, the closer was the value to 1, the greater was the probability of the existence of the species.

Habitat suitability distribution

The regionalization model demonstrated the distribution of suitable habitat for A. sinensis. We collected the habitat suitability values from 1,530 distribution points. The habitat suitability was then divided into three levels following the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method by marking in three colors for inappropriate areas (0–0.143), appropriate areas (0.144–0.378), and optimum areas (0.379–0.530). The layers with ecological overlays were loaded in ArcMap. The attributes of the setting layer in the symbol system are set based on the classification of habitat suitability. The distribution map of A. sinensis in Gansu Province was extracted by spatial analysis technology in ArcGIS.

Instruments, reagents and reference substances

ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), CP114 Electronic analytical balance (Ohaus Instrument Co. LTD, Shanghai, China), Type 101 electric blast drying oven (Beijing Yongguang Medical Equipment Factory, Beijng, China), 0.22 m microporous filter membrane (Shanghai Amspectral Experimental Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai). The reference samples of chlorogenic acid (CAS: 327-97-9), ferulic acid (CAS: 1135-24-6), ligustilide (CAS: 4431-01-0), senkyunolide I (CAS:94596-28-8), senkyunolide A (CAS: 62006-39-7), senkyunolide H (CAS: 94596-27-7), coniferyl ferulate (CAS: 63644-62-2), and butenyl phthalide (CAS: 551-08-6) were purchased from Chengdu Reffens Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Chengdu, China). The purity of the reference substances was greater than 98%. The methanol was chromatographic grade; the water was ultrapure, and the other reagents were analytically pure.

Sample preparation

A. sinensis powder (5.0 g) was accurately weighed and placed in a conical flask with a stopper. The sample was extracted with 50% methanol (50 mL) in an ultrasonic bath for 45 min. After refilling the volume, the extract was filtered through filter paper and a 0.22 mm filter membrane for analysis.

Chromatographic conditions

UPLC-PDA analysis was performed on an ACQUITY UPLC system, PDA detector. An ACQUITY UPLC ®BEH C18 column (2.1 mm×50 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) was applied for the separation. The mobile phase, composed of A (methanol) and B (acetic acid/water, 1/99, v/v), was run following a gradient elution: (0–5 min, 5%→30% A; 5–6.5 min, 30%→35% A; 6.5–8.5 min, 35%→50%A; 8.5–14 min, 50%→80%A; 14–17 min, 80% A;17~22 min, 80%→100%A; and 22–27 min, 100%→5%A). The column temperature was set at 30°C. The flow rate was set at 0.3 mL/min. The injection volume was 3 μL, and the detection wavelength was 270 nm.

The relationship model

A stepwise regression analysis was conducted between the ecological factor data and the index components to establish a prediction model for CA, FA, SI, SA, SH, CF, LI, and BP. The contents of 8 index components were used as the dependent variables and the ecological factors as independent variables to fit a linear relationship and set up the model for quality suitability regionalization for A. sinensis.

Comprehensive quality evaluation

Based on the distribution of habitat suitability of A. sinensis in Gansu Province, the unsuitable distribution areas were removed, and the spatial distribution maps of the index components in the suitable areas were obtained using ArcGIS. According to the regulations specified in the current Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2015), organic acids and volatile oils (the main effective components in A. sinensis) were used as the index ingredients to determine the contents in the A. sinensis, CA, FA, SI, SA, SH, CF, LI, and BP are representative of these compounds. The content of ferulic acid in A. sinensis should not be less than 0.05%, and the content of essential oils should not be less than 0.4% (ml/g). We identified the ecological factors that affected the index content and investigated the effects of the ecological factors on the accumulation of the organic acids and volatile oils. Based on the ArcGIS fuzzy superposition function, the spatial distribution superposition map of all the index components was obtained, and the quality of A. sinensis was comprehensively evaluated.

Results

The key environmental factors and modeling results

The key environmental factors were determined according to the contributions to the modeling process using the jackknife test (Table 2). The following nine environmental variables with the cumulative contributions of 95.8% were screened as the key environmental factors: altitude (41.9%), precipitation during March, May, and December (15.9%, 13.9%, and 6.1%), precipitation during the wettest month (8.1%), pH (3.8%); mean diurnal range (2.6%), temperature annual range (2.4%), and isothermality (1.1%). To eliminate the influence of collinearity on the modeling process and interpretation of results, a Pearson correlation analysis was conducted for the nine environmental factors. The result demonstrated that the Pearson correlation coefficients for the eight environmental factors were all less than 0.8 (Table 3). Thus, the nine environmental variables described above were selected as the key environmental factors to reconstruct the MaxEnt model. The AUC value of the ROC curve reaches 0.957, indicating an excellent prediction accuracy of the model. This model can reliably define suitable areas for the cultivation of A. sinensis in Gansu Province, China.

Table 2. The accumulated contribution of each ecological factor.

Environmental variables Percentages of contribution (%) Accumulating percentages of contribution (%) Environmental variables Percentages of contribution (%) Accumulating percentages of contribution (%)
altitude 41.9 41.9 bio3 1.1 95.8
prec3 15.9 57.8 tmean11 0.8 96.6
prec5 13.9 71.7 bio4 0.8 97.4
bio13 8.1 79.8 Prec6 0.8 98.2
prec12 6.1 85.9 tmean12 0.8 99.0
pH 3.8 89.7 prec10 0.8 99.8
bio2 2.6 92.3 tmean9 0.2 100
bio7 2.4 94.7

Table 3. Pairwise Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the environmental variables.

code altitude bio2 bio3 bio7 bio13 prec3 prec5 prec12
bio2 .358**
bio3 .585** .776**
bio7 -.182** .615** -0.007*
bio13 .442** -.096** .472** -.766**
prec3 .302** -.244** .374** -.870** .734**
prec5 .363** 0.004 .584** -.747** .896** .717**
prec12 .131** -.553** -.126** -.730** .655** .704** .468**
pH -.301** .057* -.077** .198** -.199** -.194** -.180** -.200**

* P < .05.

**P < .01.

Habitat suitability distribution

The habitat suitability distribution of Angelica sinensis (Fig 2) was plotted after classifying the growth suitability of A. sinensis at different levels. The optimal areas for growth of A. sinensis were located to the south of Wuwei City, Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Dingxi City, east of Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, north of Longnan City, surrounding Tianshui City, and northwest of Pingliang City. The appropriate areas for the growth of A. sinensis include Lanzhou City and southeast of Wuwei City. The remaining areas were predicted to be inappropriate for the growth of A. sinensis. In Fig 1, the purple dots represent the actual presence of A. sinensis. The predicted suitable distribution range was determined based on the actual presence of plants. The response curves represent the relationship between environmental variables and suitability of habitats, they help us understand the ecological niche of a species. The ranges of suitability for environmental variables were identified by the threshold of normally suitable habitats. Response curves of the important ecological factors are illustrated in (S1 File), and the suitable range for each variable is shown in (Table 4). A. sinensis grew at the altitude from 2,000 to 3,000 m, with an optimal altitude of 2760 m, and the precipitation during March was recorded from 5 to 20 mm with optimal precipitation of 16 mm. In contrast, the suitable range of isothermality was from 32 to 38% with an optimal value of 35%.

Fig 2. Habitat suitability distribution of Angelica sinensis.

Fig 2

Table 4. The suitable range and optimum value of each environmental variable.

Environmental variables Suitable range Optimal value
altitude 2000–3000 m 2760 m
prec3 5–20 mm 16 mm
prec5 50–100 mm 80 mm
bio13 80–120 mm 120 mm
prec12 1–5 mm 2 mm
pH 6.5–8 6.3
bio2 10–12°C 11°C
bio7 32–38°C 35°C
bio3 32–38% 35%

Results of the determination of content

The contents of CA, FA, SI, SA, SH, CF, LI, and BP in A. sinensis samples agreed with the regulations specified in the current Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2015), and they can be used as indicators for the quality suitability regionalization of A. sinensis. The UPLC chromatograms of the mixed standard and samples are shown in S2 File.

The relationship models of eight index components

The eight regression equations and the regression coefficient of each factor are all significant (Table 5). The eight index components content can be predicted by the relationship models.

Table 5. The relationship models of eight index components.

NO. Regression equation F test result of the regression equation T test results of the regression coefficients
1 yFA = 0.184 + 0.001*prec12 − 0.009* pH P = 5.10 e -8 <0.05 8.75e-9, 0.032
all less than 0.05
2 yCA = -1.308 + 0.011*index-wi + 0.008*bio2 + 0.0291*index-hi P = 1.39 e -6 < 0.05 1.37e-5, 0.003, 0.025
all less than 0.05
3 ySI = 0.001*alttitude − 0.003* pH + 0.005*bio2 + 0.001*prec3 P = 8.88 e -13 < 0.05 0.005, 0.014, 0.006, 0.019
all less than 0.05
4 ySH = -0.124 + 0.002*prec3 − 0.002*rz + 0.002*altitude + 0.003*prec5 − 0.002*bio6 − 0.002*bio2 P = 1.06 e -17 < 0.05 0.011, 2.56e-10, 4.22e-14
0.011, 1.63e-13, 4.38e-13
all less than 0.05
5 ySA = 0.002 + 1.345e-5*prec12 P = 0.032 < 0.05 0.032 < 0.05
6 yCF = 0.076 − 2.204e-5*rz P = 0.043 < 0.05 0.043 < 0.05
7 yLI = 0.471 + 0.02*tmean7 P = 0.028 < 0.05 0.028 < 0.05
8 yBP = 0.017*altitude − 0.025*rz + 0.022*prec4 P = 1.66 e -24 < 0.05 0.003, 3.47e-15, 1.09e-8
all less than 0.05

Note: yFA., yCA, ySI, ySH, ySA, yCF, yLI, yBP denotes the contents of chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, senkyunolide I, senkyunolide H, senkyunolide A, coniferyl ferulate, ligustilide, and butenyl phthalide.

Comprehensive quality evaluation of A. sinensis

Based on the relationship model between the index components and ecological factors of A. sinensis, using the spatial analysis function of ArcGIS v.10.5, the distribution of 8 index components has been estimated and depicted in (Figs 310). These figures show that in a suitable area, the contents of FA, SI, SH decrease from south to north, the content of CA decreases from east to west, the content of LI decreases from west to east. From north to south, the content of SA decreases, the distribution regularity of BP is not strong, and the content of CF in the suitable area is more consistent. Quality suitability regionalization of Angelica sinensis are shown in (Fig 11). Fig 11 indicates that A. sinensis species cultivated in Dingxi city, south of Tianshui, west of Longnan, east of Wuwei and Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, and Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture contain the highest levels of active constituents.

Fig 3. Distribution of chlorogenic acid (%).

Fig 3

Fig 10. Distribution of butenyl phthalide (%).

Fig 10

Fig 11. Quality suitability regionalization of Angelica sinensis.

Fig 11

Fig 4. Distribution of ferulic acid (%).

Fig 4

Fig 5. Distribution of senkyunolide I (%).

Fig 5

Fig 6. Distribution of senkyunolide A (%).

Fig 6

Fig 7. Distribution of senkyunolide H (%).

Fig 7

Fig 8. Distribution of coniferyl ferulate (%).

Fig 8

Fig 9. Distribution of coniferyl ferulate (%).

Fig 9

Discussion

Effects of the meteorological factors

According to the relationship model of eight index components, the content of FA positively correlated with prec12 but negatively correlated with the soil pH. The content of CA positively correlated with index-wi, bio2, and index-hi. The content of SI positively correlated with altitude, bio2, and prec3 but negatively correlated with the soil pH. The content of SH positively correlated with prec3, prec5, and altitude but negatively correlated with rz, bio6, and bio2. The content of SA positively correlated with prec12. The content of CF negatively correlated with rz. The content of LI positively correlated with tmean7. The content of BP positively correlated with prec4 and altitude but negatively correlated with rz. The influence of temperature and moisture on the content of index components of A. sinensis is highly significant [17]. A moderately low temperature aids in the accumulation of organic acids [18], and longer periods of sunshine did not increase the volatile oil composition [19]. This may be related to the fact that A. sinensis is a low temperature, short sunshine plant [20]. The total weight of precipitation in all the ecological factors is 43.93%, Gansu is located in the arid area of northwest China with an annual precipitation of 36.6–734.9 mm, which decreases from southeast to northwest. The precipitation is concentrated in the summer, comprising 50–70% of the annual precipitation. Thus, the moderate precipitation in spring and winter positively correlated with the index composition.

Effects of topographical and soil factors

The results of this study showed that the topographic and soil factors greatly affected the content of the index components. The weight of the altitude on A. sinensis distribution reached 41.88%. The soil pH was 3.8%. All the index components positively correlated with the altitude and negatively correlated with the soil pH. The altitude was within 2,000–3,000 m; the higher the altitude, the greater the accumulated content of the index components. As the altitude increases, photosynthetic products are distributed earlier into the roots, and the rate of accumulation of dry matter increases [21]. The appropriate soil pH of A. sinensis is 6.5–8. Investigation found that the soil in the Gansu production area was alkaline; thus, the content of the index components negatively correlated with the soil pH [22].

Comparison of the study results

The map of the quality suitability regionalization analysis shows that high contents of the index compounds are present in A. sinensis that grow in Minxian, Zhangxian, Weiyuan, Lintao, Dangchang, Lixian, Wenxian, Wushan, Lintan, Zhouqu, Zhuoni, Kangle, Linxia, Jishi Mountain, Tianzhu, and Gulang. A comparison between the areas, selected based on the suitability of regionalization and the traditional farming areas of A. sinensis, suggests that most of the areas with high suitability are those in the traditional growing areas [23]. Although the range of sampling was expanded to maximize the sampled specimens of A. sinensis, some wild A. sinensis specimens from unknown areas were not included in this study owing to some limitations, such as ecological conditions. These unknown areas will be included in our future studies.

Conclusion

The suitable areas for A. sinensis were predicted successfully by the MaxEnt model and ArcGIS. A. sinensis is primarily distributed to the south of Gansu Province, and the distribution areas are concentrated. The high suitability regions are located primarily to the south of Wuwei City, Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Dingxi City, east of Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, north of Longnan City, surrounding Tianshui City, northwest of Pingliang City, and the sub-suitable areas include Lanzhou City, southeast of Wuwei City. The distribution of A. sinensis was affected by some key environmental variables, including the altitude, precipitation during March, May, December, mean diurnal range, isothermality, annual temperature range, precipitation during the wettest month, and soil pH. The duration of annual sunshine affects the content of ferulic acid in A. sinensis. Longer periods of sunshine are unfavorable for the biosynthesis of ferulic acid. The volatile oil content of A. sinensis is greatly affected by the soil pH, altitude, precipitation in March, April, May, and December, annual sunshine duration, and temperature. Quality suitability regionalization of A. sinensis in Gansu Province shows that A. sinensis specimens from the south of Gansu, such as Dingxi City, Tangchang County, Lixian County, the Wen county in Longnan City, Wushan county in Tianshui City; the Lintan, Zhouqu, Zhuoni county in Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; Kangle and Linxia county in Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, contain the best overall quality and the highest levels of active constituents.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Sampling point informations.

(PDF)

S1 File. Response curves of the important ecological factors.

(PDF)

S2 File. UPLC chromatograms of the mixed standard (A) and Angelica sinensis (B).

Note: 1. Chlorogenic acid, 2. Ferulic acid, 3. Senkyunolide I, 4. Senkyunolide H, 5. Senkyunolide A, 6. Coniferyl ferulate, 7. Ligustilide, 8. Butenyl phthalide.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Rui Huang for reviewing the draft and polishing language of this manuscript and Xiaobo Zhang and Shaoyang Xi for their helpful suggestions on the research methodologies.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Initials of the author who received each award: L J Grant number awarded to the author: 81360615 The full name of each funder: National Natural Science Foundation of China URL of each funder website: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/ Specific grant numbers: ¥520000.

References

  • 1.Wei WL, Zeng R, Gu CM, Qu Y, Huang LF. Angelica sinensis in China-A review of botanical profile, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and chemical analysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016; 190: 116–141. 10.1016/j.jep.2016.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao L, Wang Y, Shen HL, Shen XD, Nie Y, Wang Y, et al. Structural characterization and radioprotection of bone marrow hematopoiesis of two novel polysaccharides from the root of Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(8):1712–1720. 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hook IL. Danggui to Angelica sinensis root: are potential benefits to European women lost in translation? A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;152(1):1–13. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yan JJ, Jung JS, Kim TK, Hasan A, Hong CW, Nam JS, et al. Protective effects of ferulic acid in amyloid precursor protein plus presenilin-1 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Biol Pharm Bull. 2013;36(1):140–143. 10.1248/bpb.b12-00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shao M, Qu K, Liu K, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Lian Z, et al. Effects of ligustilide on lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxic shock in rabbits. Planta Med. 2011;77(8):809–816. 10.1055/s-0030-1250573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kan WL, Cho CH, Rudd JA, Lin G. Study of the anti-prolif erative effects and synergy of phthalides from Angelica sinensis on colon cancer cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;120(1):36–43. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeong SY, Kim HM, Lee KH, Kim KY, Huang DS, Kim JH, et al. Quantitative analysis of marker compounds in Angelica gigas, Angelica sinensis, and Angelica acutiloba by HPLC/DAD. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2015;63(7):504–511. 10.1248/cpb.c15-00081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Katoh A, Fukuda S, Fukusaki E, Hashimoto T, Hayasaki T, Kanaya S, et al. Systems biology in a commercial quality study of the Japanese Angelica radix: toward an understanding of traditional medicinal plants. Am J Chin Med. 2011;39(4):757–777. 10.1142/S0192415X11009172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tang SN, Zhang J, Wu W, Jiang P, Puppala M, Zhang Y, et al. Chemopreventive Effects of Korean Angelica versus Its Major Pyranocoumarins on Two Lineages of Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate Carcinogenesis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8(9):835–44. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.National Meteorological Information Center, China Meteorological Administration. (2015). Chinese Meteorological data network, Beijing, China, http://data.cma.cn/data/index/0b9164954813c573.
  • 11.The Office for the second National Soil Survey of China. (1996). Soil Series of China. China Agricultural Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Computer network information center, Chinese academy of sciences. (2015). Geospatial Data Cloud, Beijing, China, http://www.gscloud.cn/sources/?cdataid=302&pdataid=10
  • 13.Chinese Academy of Sciences China vegetation map editor commttee. (2007). Vegetation Map of the People’s Republic of China (1: 1 million). Geological Publishing House, Beijing. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shoudong Z, Huasheng P, Lanping G, Tongren X, Yan Z, Meilan C, et al. Regionalization of Chinese Material Medical Quality Based on Maximum Entropy Model: A case study of Atractylodes lancea. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:42417 10.1038/srep42417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guo Y, Wei H, Lu C, Gao B, Gu W. Predictions of potential geographical distribution and quality of Schisandra sphenanthera under climate change. PeerJ. 2016;4: e2554 10.7717/peerj.2554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walden-Schreiner C, Leung YF, Kuhn T, Newburger T, Tsai WL. Environmental and managerial factors associated with pack stock distribution in high elevation meadows: Case study from Yosemite National Park. J Environ Manage. 2017; 193:52–63. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shang ZH, Wei HY, Gu W, Mao YJ, Zhu LN, Sang MJ. Potential Ecological Suitability Regionalization Analysis of Angelica sinensis Based on GIS and Fuzzy Matter Element Model. Zhong Yao Cai. 2015;38(7):1370–1374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ojeda-Pérez ZZ, Jiménez-Bremont JF, Delgado-Sánchez P. Continuous high and low temperature induced a decrease of photosynthetic activity and changes in the diurnal fluctuations of organic acids in Opuntia streptacantha. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186540 10.1371/journal.pone.0186540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lima VA, Pacheco FV, Avelar RP, Alvarenga ICA, Pinto JEBP, Alvarenga AA. Growth, photosynthetic pigments and production of essential oil of long-pepper under different light conditions. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;89(2):1167–1174. 10.1590/0001-3765201720150770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Z, Zhang C, Ren G, Yang M, Zhu S, Li M. Ecological modeling of Cistanche deserticola Y.C. Ma in Alxa, China. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13134 10.1038/s41598-019-48397-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Oliveira JB, Egipto R, Laureano O, et al. Climate effects on physicochemical composition of Syrah grapes at low and high altitude sites from tropical grown regions of Brazil. Food Res Int. 2019; 121:870–879. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ojeda-Pérez ZZ, Jiménez-Bremont JF, Delgado-Sánchez P. Continuous high and low temperature induced a decrease of photosynthetic activity and changes in the diurnal fluctuations of organic acids in Opuntia streptacantha. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186540 10.1371/journal.pone.0186540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yan H, Zhang XB, Zhu SD, Qian DW, Guo LP, Huang LQ, et al. Production regionalization study of Chinese angelica based on MaxEnt model. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2016;41(17):3139–3147. 10.4268/cjcmm20161705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vassilis G Aschonitis

22 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-27049

Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu , China

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. XU,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 05 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vassilis G. Aschonitis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

"5172".

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. Please note that in order to use the direct billing option the corresponding author must be affiliated with the chosen institute. Please either amend your manuscript to change the affiliation or corresponding author, or email us at plosone@plos.org with a request to remove this option.

4.We note that [Figure(s) 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15] in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Funding Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by the Youth Fund of the Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (No. ZQ2015-8), the Natural science foundation of Gansu Provinc(No.1610RJZA066), and China national natural science foundation regional science foundation project (No. 81360615)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors Tiantian Zhu, Tingting Shi, Juan Chen, Ling Jin.

7. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation:….” as necessary).

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is good and publishable. Few grammatical errors within the manuscript can be corrected including the addressing the uploaded comments. I recommend it for publication.

Abstract is in order.

Introduction

In lines 57 – 59, authors should explain how expansion of cultivation of A. Sinensis has deteriorated its yield, since it is expected that when something is expanded, it should be increased in quantity. Otherwise, since focus on this research is on ‘quality’, the yield aspect can be omitted.

Materials and Methods

Lines 93 – 94: What is the difference between meteorological data and comprehensive meteorological data used as ecological factors. I think authors could just use one of these and explain further in the methods the kind of meteorological data used in the study.

Results

Presentation of results in lines 214 – 246 is cumbersome and unclear. Authors should simply present the relationships and their significance coherently, which can be presented in a tabular form to show their predictability.

Discussion

Lines 260 – 295: Authors should back their findings with literature to consolidate generated knowledge from this research. Current discussion is more of a commentary on the results other than backing the results with scientific facts on why such findings were obtained and their implications.

Conclusion is in order.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review comments - Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243750.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-27049 Response to Reviewers

18-Nov-2020

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu ,China”(ID:PONE-D-20-27049). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Journal Requirements:

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The manuscript has been corrected as PLOS ONE's style requirements, revised portion were marked in red.

2.Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. We have no competing interests. The statement "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."has been added to the cover letter.

3.Please note that in order to use the direct billing option the corresponding author must be affiliated with the chosen institute. Please either amend your manuscript to change the affiliation or corresponding author, or email us at plosone@plos.org with a request to remove this option.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The manuscript has been amended,

the corresponding author was affiliated with the chosen institute,now.

4.We note that [Figure(s) 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15] in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted.We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. Figure(s) 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are all the standard maps of Gansu Province, now. Map review number: Gan S(2017)64. Download address: Department of natural resources of Gansu Province (http://zrzy.gansu.gov.cn/).The standard map of Gansu province can be downloaded for free, it does not need to be approved.

5.We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement.Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The funding-related text from the manuscript has been removed. Funding Statements were added to the cover letter.

6. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors Tiantian Zhu, Tingting Shi, Juan Chen, Ling Jin.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The manuscript submission data has been amended , including authors Tiantian Zhu, Tingting Shi, Juan Chen, Ling Jin.

7. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The list of authors on the manuscript has been amended,revised portion were marked in red.

8.While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool,  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. The figure files have been uploaded to PACE. All the figures meet PLOS requirements, now.

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

1.In lines 57 – 59, authors should explain how expansion of cultivation of A. Sinensis has deteriorated its yield, since it is expected that when something is expanded, it should be increased in quantity. Otherwise, since focus on this research is on ‘quality’, the yield aspect can be omitted.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review.We are so sorry about the wrong statement.The sentence has been corrected as“… which eventually has deteriorated the quality of A. sinensis”, Please see the red part in Line 57-58 of Page 3.

2.Materials and Methods

Lines 93 – 94: What is the difference between meteorological data and comprehensive meteorological data used as ecological factors. I think authors could just use one of these and explain further in the methods the kind of meteorological data used in the study.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review.We are so sorry about the wrong statement.We've deleted “comprehensive meteorological data”.Please see the red part in Line 91-92 of Page 5.

3.Results

Presentation of results in lines 214 – 246 is cumbersome and unclear. Authors should simply present the relationships and their significance coherently, which can be presented in a tabular form to show their predictability.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. Presentation of results in lines 214 – 246 have been presented in a tabular form to show their predictability.Please see the red part in Line 211-218 of Page12.

4.Discussion

Lines 260 – 295: Authors should back their findings with literature to consolidate generated knowledge from this research. Current discussion is more of a commentary on the results other than backing the results with scientific facts on why such findings were obtained and their implications.

Response: Done. Thank you for your careful review. Literature has been added to support our findings to consolidate the knowledge derived from this study. Please see the red part in Line 239-267 of Page15.

Special thanks to Editors and Reviewers for these good comments.

We appreciate for Editors and Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

Vassilis G Aschonitis

26 Nov 2020

Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu , China

PONE-D-20-27049R1

Dear Dr. Jin,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Vassilis G. Aschonitis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Vassilis G Aschonitis

3 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-27049R1

Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu, China

Dear Dr. Jin:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Vassilis G. Aschonitis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Sampling point informations.

    (PDF)

    S1 File. Response curves of the important ecological factors.

    (PDF)

    S2 File. UPLC chromatograms of the mixed standard (A) and Angelica sinensis (B).

    Note: 1. Chlorogenic acid, 2. Ferulic acid, 3. Senkyunolide I, 4. Senkyunolide H, 5. Senkyunolide A, 6. Coniferyl ferulate, 7. Ligustilide, 8. Butenyl phthalide.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revise Letter.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review comments - Quality suitability regionalization analysis of Angelica sinensis in Gansu.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES