Abstract
RNA modifications are a well-recognized way of gene expression regulation at the post-transcriptional level. Despite the importance of this level of regulation, current knowledge on modulation of tRNA modification status in response to stress conditions is far from being complete. While it is widely accepted that tRNA modifications are rather dynamic, such variations are mostly assessed in terms of total tRNA, with only a few instances where changes could be traced to single isoacceptor species. Using Escherichia coli as a model system, we explored stress-induced modulation of 2′-O-methylations in tRNAs by RiboMethSeq. This analysis and orthogonal analytical measurements by LC-MS show substantial, but not uniform, increase of the Gm18 level in selected tRNAs under mild bacteriostatic antibiotic stress, while other Nm modifications remain relatively constant. The absence of Gm18 modification in tRNAs leads to moderate alterations in E. coli mRNA transcriptome, but does not affect polysomal association of mRNAs. Interestingly, the subset of motility/chemiotaxis genes is significantly overexpressed in ΔTrmH mutant, this corroborates with increased swarming motility of the mutant strain. The stress-induced increase of tRNA Gm18 level, in turn, reduced immunostimulation properties of bacterial tRNAs, which is concordant with the previous observation that Gm18 is a suppressor of Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-mediated interferon release. This documents an effect of stress induced modulation of tRNA modification that acts outside protein translation.
INTRODUCTION
After transcription, all cellular RNAs enter into complex post-transcriptional maturation processes, including a multitude of enzymatic modifications altering the chemical properties of parental nucleotides. Over 170 different chemical modifications have been described so far (see http://modomics.genesilico.pl/ (1)), with the most common RNA modifications being pseudouridylation (U-to-Ψ conversion) and various types of base and ribose methylations. Among all RNA types, transfer RNAs (tRNAs) show the highest density of modifications which have multiple cellular functions. In addition to purely structural roles and general protection of RNA molecules from degradation (by alkaline hydrolysis and/or endonucleolytic enzymes (reviewed in (2–6)), tRNA modifications increase ribosome binding affinity, reduce reading errors and modulate frameshifting, thus affecting mRNA translation rate and fidelity (5,7–10).
Recently, the dynamic behavior of eukaryotic tRNA modifications has been linked to regulation of cell growth or cellular stress responses (11–13). The majority of such studies has been conducted in lower eukaryotes, where it was demonstrated that tRNA modification profile changes upon elevated growth temperatures or under growth arrest conditions (14–17). By quantification of tRNA modifications by LC-MS/MS it was demonstrated that levels of Cm, m5C and m22G modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNAs increase after exposure to oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), but not in response to hypochlorite (NaOCl). Moreover, levels of 23 out of the 25 analyzed S. cerevisiae tRNA modifications change in response to toxic substances, such as NaAsO2 (sodium arsenite, toxicity) or methyl methanesulfonate (CH3-SO3-CH3, DNA damage) (18). These observations clearly demonstrate the importance of selected tRNA modifications in adaptive response to toxic substances. In addition, the wobble-base tRNA modifications (pos 34) modulate regulation of a codon-biased translation during cellular stress response (19–21). Overall, the emerging concept is that dynamically regulated tRNA modifications allow regulation of gene expression at the translational level, by differential usage of redundant mRNA codons, to provide better adaptation to stress conditions by the expression of crucial stress-related proteins (22–25).
In bacteria and archaebacteria (26), correlations were reported between tRNA modification profiles on one hand and growth temperature and oxidative stress on the other hand (27–32). However, only few studies link cellular adaptation response to stress conditions to dynamic changes of specific tRNAs and provide a molecular basis for the impact of modification levels on gene expression. For instance, MiaB-mediated ms2i6A37 modification in Escherichia coli tRNA plays a role in stress response by modulating the steady-state level of the stress-induced transcription factor RpoS (33). Moreover, a study on Mycobacterium bovis demonstrated that early hypoxia induces wobble modification cmo5U in tRNAThr (cmo5UGU), thus leading to codon-biased translation (34).
RNA 2′-O-methylation is the most common modification occurring at the ribose moiety. In tRNAs, synthesis of such residues is typically mediated by position-specific, stand-alone, proteinaceous tRNA methyltransferases (MTases) that catalyze the transfer of a CH3-group (Me-group) from a methyl donor, generally S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM or AdoMet) to the tRNA (35). Only three positions are known to be 2′-O-methylated in E. coli tRNAs. The major site of tRNA 2′-O-methylation is located in the D-loop at position 18, where the highly conserved G residue is frequently converted to a 2′-O-methylated guanine (Gm) by TrmH (SpoU)-like enzymes. This modification is quite common and is present in 12 out of 35 E. coli tRNAs. Two other Nm residues are located in the anticodon loop at positions 32 and 34 (wobble position), where Cm and Um/cmnm5Um residues are present in 8 selected tRNAs. TrmJ and TrmL enzymes are responsible for 2′-O-methylation of Cm/Um32 and Cm/cmnm5Um34, respectively (reviewed in (36)).
tRNA 2′-O-methylation in E. coli (Gm18) is also known to be an effective structural anti-determinant for recognition by the mammalian innate immune system via interaction with Toll-like receptors (TLR7) (37–41). Innate immune system receptors recognize microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and activate immune cells. In the TLR receptor family, TLR7 and TLR8 are activated by single stranded RNA of bacterial origin, which typically contains significantly fewer modifications than mammalian rRNA and tRNA. In humans, TLR7 is preferentially expressed in plasmacytoid dendritic (pDC) and B cells and specifically induces the production of type I interferon such as IFN-α, whereas TLR8 is found in myeloid dendritic cells and regulatory T cells and its activation leads to the production of other inflammatory cytokines (for reviews (42,43)). Next to spatial restrictions and sequence positions in nucleic acids, ribose-methylated guanosine in tRNA (Gm18) was among the first RNA modifications to be identified as crucial in the distinction between ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ RNA molecules by the innate immune system (44). In vitro studies showed that incorporation of a 2′-O-methylation in synthetic RNA transcripts, siRNA (45) or 18S rRNA prevents TLR activation (40,46). Given that mammalian tRNA and rRNA, which together amount to over 90% of cellular RNA mass, contain high amounts of ribose-methylated nucleosides, the current hypothesis views ribose methylation, in particular Gm, as a positive identifier of ‘self’ i.e. human/mammalian RNA. In line with this, it was demonstrated that native bacterial E. coli tRNATyr, which is one of Gm18 containing tRNA, actually antagonizes TLR7-mediated signaling and the presence of this modification actually suppresses bacterial tRNA recognition (37–38,41), defining a potential principle of immune escape.
In this study we focused on stress-induced modulation of tRNA 2′-O-methylations in a model bacteria E. coli. Stress conditions were, in part, mimicking the host environment during bacterial invasion: mild antibiotic stress and limited nutrient supply (starvation). We demonstrate that these stimuli indeed modulate global profile of E. coli tRNA 2′-O-methylation thus pointing out their potential role in the escape from the host innate immune system. Reliable measurements of 2′-O-methylation levels were performed by a combination of two orthogonal techniques: high-throughput sequencing-based RiboMethSeq (47–49) and LC-MS/MS analyses (50–52). Data obtained by both techniques demonstrate an excellent correlation for technical and biological replicates. Under stress conditions (mainly starvation and mild sub-lethal antibiotic stress) Gm18 methylation was observed in a majority of potentially modified tRNAs, while it is reduced under standard laboratory growth conditions. Deletion of TrmH, responsible for Gm18 modification in tRNAs, only moderately alters E.coli mRNA transcriptome, and does not affect polysomal association of mRNAs. However, mutant ΔTrmH strain shows significant overexpression of motility/chemiotaxis genes, and, consequently, increased swarming motility. Moreover, stress also modulates immunostimulatory properties of bacterial RNA, as assessed by PBMC immunostimulation assay. Altogether, our data demonstrate that starvation and antibiotic stress conditions lead to a selective increase of Gm18 methylation in tRNA and, in turn, to the inhibition of the host immune response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strain and stress conditions used
The E. coli strain DH5α (lacZ Delta M15 Delta(lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rK-mK+) supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1) was grown in lysogeny broth (LB) medium to mid-log phase (0.8–1.2 OD600nm) at 37°C, 190 rpm for the control condition (LB 37°C).
Eleven different stress conditions were applied: LB 20°C, LB 42°C, minimal medium M9 37°C, M9 20°C, LB 37°C Hypoxia, LB 20°C Hypoxia, starvation in polymerase chain reaction (PBS), streptomycin, spectinomycin, chloramphenicol and gentamycin in sub-lethal concentrations (details on bacterial cultures under stress conditions are given in Supplementary Data).
tRNA extraction
Direct tRNA extraction from E. coli using TRIzol™ reagent was done essentially as described previously (53). RNA concentration was controlled by UV absorbance using NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The profile of isolated tRNA fractions was assessed by capillary electrophoresis using an RNA 6000 Pico chip on Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies).
Isolation of individual tRNA species
The principle of individual tRNA isolation is outlined in the Supplementary Figure S1. Pure tRNA isoacceptors were isolated by affinity column chromatography on covalently immobilized fully complementary synthetic DNA oligonucleotide (54). Further details are given in Supplementary Table S1 and in the Supplementary Data.
RiboMethSeq analysis of 2′-O-methylations in tRNAs
Analysis of E. coli tRNA 2′-O-methylation was performed according to tRNA-adapted version of general RiboMethSeq protocol as described previously (48,53). Further details are given in Supplementary Data.
Analysis of modified nucleosides by LC-MS(MS)
Total tRNA or individual tRNA samples were digested and dephosphorylated into nucleosides, mixed with internal standard for quantification and analyzed with an Agilent 1260 Infinity system in combination with an Agilent 6460 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray ion source as described in Supplementary Table S2 (50,52,55).
Polysome profiling
Analysis of polysome-associated mRNAs and tRNA was performed in triplicate, using WT and ΔTrmH isogenic E. coli strains from KEIO collection (56). Cells were grown to optical density OD600nm of 0.6 in LB medium (supplemented by 25 μg/ml of kanamycin for ΔTrmH) at 37°C, collected by centrifugation and lysed by lysozyme and freeze-thaw cycles to obtain cellular extract. An aliquot was conserved to serve as a reference of total mRNA/tRNA expression (‘Lysate fraction’). Total extract was loaded onto sucrose gradient (5–40%) and polysomal fraction was collected after centrifugation at 35 000 rpm for 2.5 h at 4°C. RNA from polysomal fraction was extracted by TRI Reagent and used for further analysis (‘Polysome fraction’). Depletion of E. coli rRNAs and simultaneous fragmentation was done using QIAseq FastSelect–5S/16S/23S Kit (Cat No./ID: 335925). Resulting RNA fragments were 3′-dephosphorylated and 5′-phosphorylated and used for library preparation with NEBNext Small RNA kit (E7330). Sequencing was done on Illumina HiSeq1000 in SR50 mode. About 30–40 millions of raw reads were obtained for each sample. Analysis of rRNA mapped reads confirmed low residual level of rRNA fragments (∼5%). Raw reads were aligned to E. coli tRNA reference database followed by mapping to KEIO E. coli transcriptome. Counting was done independently for tRNAs and mRNA and normalized to library size. Differential expression analysis was done using DESeq2 R package (57).
Immunostimulation assays
Human PBMCs were isolated from heparinized blood of healthy volunteers upon informed consent or from anonymized buffy coats from the local blood donation service. The study was approved by the local ethical committee (registration no. S-716/2017). After isolation by standard Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll 1.078 g/ml), PBMCs were resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated human serum and seeded in 96-well flat bottom plates at a cell number of 2 × 105 cells/well. For the purification of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) from isolated PBMCs, a negative selection program was performed using the autoMACS Pro Separator according to the manufacturer's protocol with the plasmacytoid dendritic cell isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). A purity of CD303/CD123 double positive cells of >90% was confirmed by FACS analysis. The pDCs were resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% heat inactivated human serum and seeded in 96-well flat bottom plates at a cell number of 5000 cells/well. For transfection experiments, RNAs were encapsulated with DOTAP at a ratio of 3 μl DOTAP per 1 μg of RNA in Opti-MEM reduced serum medium following the manufacturer's protocol. PBMCs or pDCs were then transfected with 1 μg/ml or 0.5 μg/ml RNA. After 20 h of incubation in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C, cell-free supernatants were collected for cytokine quantification via ELISA (eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany).
Motility assay
The parental WT and the ΔTrmH E. coli strains (K-12 KEIO collection) were maintained on sheep blood agar plates at 4°C for a maximum of 14 days. The protocol for the motility assay was adapted from Barker et al. (58). The strains were cultured overnight in Tryptone Broth medium (TB, tryptone 10 g/l, sodium chloride 5 g/l) with shaking (200 rpm) at 33°C. A total of 2 μl of the overnight cultures were inoculated into semisolid TB agar with 0.3% (wt/vol) agar. After incubation for 24 h at 33°C, swarm diameters were measured. Photographs were taken with a Nikon DSLR camera.
RESULTS
Study design
tRNA modification levels can be assessed by different approaches (59,60), either globally, e.g. by LC-MS or similar techniques, or site-by-site, using deep sequencing-based methods of RNA modification analysis providing single nucleotide resolution. We previously extended the application of alkaline hydrolysis-based RiboMethSeq to analysis of E. coli tRNA 2′-O-methylations and demonstrated that the level of individual Nm residues can be precisely measured using this technique (48). Therefore, RiboMethSeq was used in this study to measure dynamic modulation of E. coli tRNA 2′-O-methylations under various stress conditions. Altogether, out of 20 potentially 2′-O-methylated sites in E. coli tRNAs (48), we were able to reliably detect and assess the 2′-O-methylation status of 17 of them (9 Gm18, 6 Um/Cm32 and 2 U*m/Gm34). Three residual Gm18 sites in rare isoacceptor tRNAs (tRNAIle(k2CAU), tRNAMet(ac4CAU) and tRNAGln(U*UG)) were excluded from analysis since sequencing coverage, particularly for the D-loop of these tRNAs, was insufficient for reliable quantitative assessment of the modification level.
Conditions of bacterial growth are known to affect the RNA(tRNA) modifications. Most prominent changes have been observed under stresses, such as nutritional deficiency, low or high temperature, reduced oxygen level or oxidative stress and the presence of various antibiotics at sub-lethal concentrations (18,27,34). In order to screen the maximum of potentially relevant stress conditions, we explored media composition (rich LB versus poor M9 medium), temperature (standard 37°C, versus 42°C and 20°C), starvation in PBS and reduced oxygen supply (hypoxia-like conditions) previously used for mycobacteria (34), as well as low concentration of antibiotics, producing bacteriostatic effects (sub-lethal antibiotic stress).
Variations of tRNA 2′-O-methylation under stress conditions
The first general screening of tRNA 2′-O-methylation levels at different growth conditions revealed that only few of the known 2′-O-methylated sites were constitutively modified in E. coli and did not show any substantial and/or reproducible variation under different stress conditions applied (Figure 1). These constitutively modified residues are mostly Um/Cm residues at position 32, but also some Gm18 methylations. Interestingly, and in some contrast, other tRNA 2′-O-methylated positions, including, in particular, a number of Gm18 sites, displayed substantial variations under stress, and specifically under starvation and stress created by sub-lethal antibiotic concentrations. The heatmap in Figure 1 shows variations of the MethScore level (row-normalized to average) site-by-site, and absolute numbers are given in the Supplementary Figure S2A and B. In most cases, a general increase of G18 2′-O-methylation was detected under stress, with only a few not-Gm18 cases (tRNALeu(CmAA)-Cm34), where a slight decrease was observed. Of note, other growth conditions, like poor medium (M9), low (20°C) or high growth temperature (42°C) and restricted oxygen supply (hypoxia-like conditions) had only a very mild effect on tRNA 2′-O-methylation, compared to starvation in PBS and antibiotics tested.
Figure 1.
Initial screening of stress conditions for analysis of tRNA 2′-O-methylation dynamics in Escherichia coli. Heatmap represents MethScore values for measurable positions of 2′-O-methylation known in E. coli tRNAs. In order to assess biological variability, analysis was performed using independent biological replicates. Normalization of MethScore values was done as a difference to the average MethScore for all samples at a given position. Scale of MethScore variation is shown in the Color Key (top left). tRNA identity, anticodon and modified position are indicated on the right.
Since the most substantial variations of tRNA 2′-O-methylation levels were observed under starvation and sub-lethal antibiotic stress, we decided to focus our study on those conditions, and to also extend the list of antibiotics used. In addition to streptomycin and spectinomycin used for the initial screening, we also included chloramphenicol and gentamycin at sub-lethal concentrations. The choice of these antibiotics was based on their chemical structure and molecular mechanism of action: streptomycin and spectinomycin are aminoglycosides which bind to 16S rRNA and modulate ribosome fidelity and speed, altering codon-anticodon recognition and ribosome translocation, respectively. Chloramphenicol is a non-aminoglycoside antibiotic that inhibits ribosome peptidyltransferase activity by binding to 23S rRNA. Gentamycin, like streptomycin, binds 16S rRNA and affects mRNA translation fidelity and was included in the study since it is frequently used in clinics for treatment of beta-lactam-resistant bacterial infections. In order to reduce the biological variability, replicates in these series were derived from the same E. coli bacterial culture (experimental design is shown in Supplementary Figure S3).
Renewed RiboMethSeq analysis of tRNA 2′-O-methylation fully confirmed results identified in the initial screening (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S4A–D) and documented hypermethylation of certain ribose moieties as a common response toward all the various ribosome-acting antibiotics examined. Biological replicates provided very consistent results demonstrating that the level of Gm18 in 5 specific tRNAs strongly increased (Figure 2). In some instances, tRNA positions that appeared almost unmodified under standard growth conditions (e.g. Gm18 in tRNALeu(cmnm5UmAA) and tRNASer(CGA), see Figure 2, left and middle panels) became highly modified under stress. A similar trend was also observed for Cm32 in tRNASer(cmo5UGA), while levels of 2′-O-methylation for cmnm5Um34 and Cm34 were mildly decreased upon treatment with aminoglycosides and strongly reduced upon chloramphenicol sub-lethal stress (Supplementary Figure S4C and D).
Figure 2.
MethScore values for 5 most responsive positions in Escherichia coli tRNAs, observed under standard conditions (control LB 37°C) and under starvation in PBS (starvation) and sub-lethal antibiotic stress. The identity of analyzed tRNA position is shown on the top of each panel, identity of sample is indicated in color and shown on the bottom. Boxplot represents mean values (n = 2–4) as a bar, distance between (first and third quantile and a box), max/min values as whiskers and outliers as black dots.
The changes observed under stress were reversible and normal levels of 2′-O-methylation were restored when the aliquot of E. coli culture under stress was withdrawn and re-grown in a new LB batch at 37°C (Supplementary Figure S5).
In E. coli, 2′-O-methylated residues are found not only in tRNAs, but also in rRNA, where four sites are known (rRNA 16S-m4Cm1402, 23S-Cm2498/Gm2251/Um2552). To complete RiboMethSeq analysis, rRNA-mapped reads were recovered and used for calculation of MethScore at these positions. As shown in Supplementary Figure S6, rRNA 2′-O-methylation was not affected by stress conditions tested here, indicating that rRNA methylation is rather constitutive in E. coli.
Validation of RiboMethSeq analysis by LC-MS
RiboMethSeq data clearly demonstrated that 2′-O-methylation signals observed in E. coli tRNAs were modulated under stress conditions tested. In order to confirm and validate these data by an orthogonal analytical technology, we performed LC-MS analysis of tRNA modification levels in the same samples. Nucleoside analysis of tRNA digest does not allow mapping to a given modification site, but rather provides a quantitative information on modulation of RNA modification content.
Total tRNA analysis
First, we performed global measurements of Gm, Cm, Um (Am residues are not present in E. coli tRNAs) and, for control purposes, pseudouridine content in total tRNA fractions obtained under control conditions (LB 37°C), as well as under starvation and antibiotic stress (streptomycin and spectinomycin). As shown in Figure 3, levels of Cm, Um were relatively stable or showed some decrease under stress and the pseudouridine level was only increased in spectinomycin condition. In contrast, global Gm level in tRNA fractions increased significantly under antibiotic stress and starvation. Of note, while this observed increase was in line with the RiboMethSeq results, it was observed for total tRNA and may vary for tRNA species taken individually.
Figure 3.
LC/MS analysis of global 2′-O-methylation content in total Escherichia coli tRNA fraction. Normalized LC/MS content of modified nucleoside is shown for 2′-O-guanosine (Gm), 2′-O-cytosine (Cm), 2′-O-uridine (Um) and pseudouridine (used as control here). Biological replicates (n = 3) and technical replicates (n = 2) are shown as color bars and black dots/triangles/squares, respectively. *: P-value < 0.05, **: P-value < 0.01, ****: P-value < 0.0001. Statistical values were calculated for technical and biological replicates using two-tailed t-test with unequal variance.
Isolation and analysis of individual tRNAs
In order to attribute alterations of global Gm level in total tRNA fraction to individual variations by tRNA observed in RiboMethSeq, four individual tRNAs were isolated to highly homogeneous state by immobilized DNA-oligonucleotide affinity column (see Supplementary Figure S1). Purity of the preparations was confirmed by library preparation and sequencing (Supplementary Figure S7). Preparation of individual tRNAs was done for control condition LB 37°C, starvation in PBS as well as for three antibiotic stress conditions (streptomycin, spectinomycin and chloramphenicol).
Figure 4 shows comparison of LC-MS measurements for Gm18, Cm32 and Cm34 levels in individual tRNAs with data obtained by RiboMethSeq analysis of the same samples.
Figure 4.
Scatter plots for correlation of LC-MS and RiboMethSeq data for 2′-O-methylation quantification. Variations are shown as a relative increase (or decrease) of 2′-O-methylation compared to control values observed for LB 37°C (control condition, in gray). Biological replicates (n = 3) are shown. The identity of measured tRNA position is indicated on the top of each panel, the nature of the stress is given in color and shape of the dot.
Altogether, data showed very consistent measures of Gm18 tRNA content obtained by LC-MS and RiboMethSeq. In most cases, the dispersion among biological replicates data was lower for RiboMethSeq, compared to LC-MS measurements, even if the latter were performed in technical replicates. Only for Cm32 in tRNASer(cmo5UGA), LC-MS measurements showed invariability of the Cm32 content, while an increase was apparent in RiboMethSeq. This may be related to variations of other non-measured modifications in a close proximity of Cm32 (namely cmo5U34 at tRNA wobble position) and thus somehow affected the protection score for Cm32 calculated in RiboMethSeq approach. Apart from this discrepancy on cytidine ribose methylation, LC-MS and RiboMethSeq gave consistent results, with respect to the dynamic modulation of Gm18 in E. coli tRNAs under starvation and mild sub-lethal antibiotic stress.
Gm18 tRNA modification does not affect tRNA translation efficiency
In order to evaluate the importance of tRNA-Gm18 in bacterial translation, we performed a comparative analysis of tRNAs and mRNAs associated to polysomal fraction in WT and ΔTrmH E. coli strains. Both tRNAs and mRNAs were counted both in Lysate and Polysomal fractions, to determine alteration of tRNA/mRNA steady-state level, as well as association to polysomal fraction implicated in active translation. As shown in Figure 5A (insert), both total and polysomal fractions of E. coli mRNAs show consistent alteration upon deletion of TrmH. Proportion of polysome-associated mRNAs shows good a correlation with global mRNA expression in lysates (Figure 5A). Over 200 mRNAs were up- or downregulated upon TrmH deletion and a substantial proportion of deregulated genes belongs to pathways controlling chemiotaxis and motility. However, all over/under-expressed genes showed increase/decreased polysomal association, indicating that mRNA translation efficiency was not affected upon the absence of Gm18 modification in tRNA. Since the majority of mRNAs overexpressed in TrmH-deficient strain belongs to flagella/chemiotaxis/motility pathways, we compared motility of this E. coli strain compared to its WT counterpart. As shown in Figure 5A and Supplementary Figure S8, indeed, ΔTrmH strain showed a substantially increased motility on agarose plates.
Figure 5.
Comparative analysis of global mRNA/tRNA alterations and specific association to polysomes in WT and ΔTrmH Escherichia coli strains. (A) Correlation between polysomal association of E. coli mRNAs and their expression level in lysates for WT and ΔTrmH strains. Values are expressed in Log2FoldChange levels between WT and ΔTrmH strains. Points indicated show genes with altered level both in lysate and in polysomes (padj <0.0001). Genes affected only in lysate (or polysome fraction) are in green and blue, respectively. Identity of genes with altered expression and polysomal association is shown. Left top insert shows Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot for mRNA expression and polysomal association in three biological replicates. Lower right insert illustrates increased swarming motility of ΔTrmH compared to WT cells (full data are shown in Supplementary Figure S8). (B) Altered polysomal association of tRNAs in ΔTrmH strain. Left panel shows PCA plot for biological replicates. Volcano plot (log10(padj value) versus log2FoldChange) for mutant ΔTrmH strain versus WT. Colors are attributed according to padj value and Log2FC (legend at top left corner). Scatter plot on the right panel (correlation of log2FoldChanges in Polysomes versus lysates) demonstrates globally identical level of tRNA expression (only tRNAGly(TCC) shows padj<0.05), but altered association with polysomal fraction (statistically significant points are indicated, padj<0.05).
Analysis of tRNA expression and association to polysomes demonstrated that tRNA expression (and stability) was unaffected when Gm18 was missing, while polysomal association was altered for a subset of tRNA species (Figure 5B). tRNAs Gly(GCC) and Glu(TTC) showed decreased association to translating ribosomes, while initiator tRNAfMet, as well as tRNAs Ser(GGA,TGA,CGA,GCT), Cys(GCA), Trp(CCA) and Leu(CAG) were substantially enriched. Of note, there was no correlation between the presence of Gm18 modification in E. coli tRNAs and their altered association with polysomal fraction upon TrmH deletion.
These results clearly indicate that tRNA-Gm18 has little impact on mRNA translation by the ribosome and tRNA stability, but rather selectively affects expression level of certain mRNAs as well as association of specific tRNAs to polysomal fraction, most likely as a part of adaptive response.
Modulation of tRNA immunostimulation properties
One of the known biological functions of Gm18 modification in bacterial tRNA is its modulation of the human innate immune response, e.g. inhibition of IFN secretion by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. This effect is mainly mediated by antagonizing endosomal receptor TLR7 which recognizes a short nucleotide context (including Gm18 as a major identity determinant) in the tRNA D-loop (37–38,40–41). Since we observed substantial modulation of Gm18 E. coli tRNA content under stress conditions, we wondered if these changes were sufficient to also modulate TLR7-mediated immune response to such differentially modified tRNAs, even if Gm modified individual tRNAs only comprise a subfraction within total tRNA.
In order to measure immunomodulation, total tRNA fraction isolated under chloramphenicol stress was used to stimulate human pDCs followed by measurement of IFNα and TNFα release by ELISA. The level of IFNα release is known to be highly variable, depending on the source of donor PBMCs, thus measurements were made for 3 independent pDC preparations.
As shown in Figure 6A and B and Supplementary Figure S9, IFNα and TNFα release by pDCs treated with total bacterial tRNAs obtained under chloramphenicol stress (and thus having high Gm content) was significantly reduced compared to treatment with the same concentrations of total tRNA preparation obtained from control bacterial culture (LB 37°C). It should be taken into account, that only a proportion of Gm18-containing tRNAs shows differential methylation, while modification level of other species remains relatively stable.
Figure 6.

Immunostimulation properties of Escherichia coli total tRNA fraction measured using IFNα and TNFα release by human pDC and PBMCs. (A andB) Human pDCs from three healthy donors were stimulated with total tRNA from control conditions (LB 37°C) and from chloramphenicol treated E. coli lab strain culture at two different concentrations (1 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml). Total RNA from Staphylococcus aureus (bRNA), R848 and CpG2216 served as positive controls. The IFNα (A) and TNFα (B) release was measured for three biological replicates of tRNA fractions and in two technical replicates for ELISA measurements. (C) Human PBMCs from healthy donors were stimulated with total tRNA from three different clinical E. coli strains isolated from patient's urine samples at 1 μg/ml. The E. coli strains were cultured under control (LB 37°C) and stress conditions (chloramphenicol treated). Total RNA from S. aureus (bRNA), R848 and CpG 2216 served as positive control. The IFNα release was measured for three biological replicates of tRNA fractions and in two technical replicates for ELISA measurements. Error bars show standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).
In order to verify if the increased level of methylation and thus decreased immunostimulation properties of total tRNA observed for a laboratory E. coli strain can be also reproduced in clinical settings, clinical E. coli isolates obtained from patients were also subjected to stress. Total tRNA fractions were used to determine both immunostimulation and methylation pattern. As shown in Figure 6C, total tRNA fractions extracted from clinical strains follow the same trend that was observed for the laboratory E. coli strain: tRNAs from E. coli cultured under stress conditions are significantly less stimulatory compared to tRNAs from control conditions. Furthermore, according to the RiboMethSeq data (Supplementary Figure S10), more Gm methylation in tRNA extracted from stressed bacteria was observed, correlating again very clearly with a decrease in immunostimulation.
We conclude, that this bacterial adaptation of tRNA modification to antibiotic stress mediates a biological effect not related to bacterial translation, namely a modulation of immunostimulatory properties.
DISCUSSION
Modulation and interdependence among RNA modifications (mostly in tRNA, but now also in mRNA) in response to abnormal (stress) physiological states of the cell are well established (15,28,30). Not only is the presence of various RNA modifications known to be required for adequate stress response (21,61–63), but also have more and more cases of their modulation under stress conditions been reported (14,27,64–67). However, in the majority of cases, such changes in RNA modification profile were appreciated only by global analysis of modified nucleoside content in total RNA fraction, or after partial fractionation e.g. isolation of total tRNA (13,17–18,22,68). These observed global differences may be also related to modulation of the tRNA pool composition (69,70), potentially affecting global modified nucleoside content (71,72). Such adaptive regulation of the tRNA pool was observed e.g. for lactic bacteria Lactococcus lactis (73). In a Caenorhabditis elegans animal starvation model, a dynamic regulation of m1A, m5C, m7G, m5U in large RNAs, as well as ac4C and mcm5s2U in tRNAs was revealed by high-resolution LC-MS analysis (68).
In contrast to previously reported global evaluations of RNA modification content in tRNAs (74,75), a detailed analysis of 2′-O-methylation status by tRNA species and by position was performed in our study. High-throughput profiling of tRNA 2′-O-methylation by RiboMethSeq allowed to measure modulation of tRNA modification under various stress conditions. We found that temperature and nature of nutrients in the growth media have only minor effects on tRNA ribose methylations’ status, while starvation (PBS) and antibiotic stress lead, somewhat surprisingly, to a clearly significant increase. Modulation of tRNA 2′-O-methylation was not simply linked to a slow growth (and thus longer contact time with tRNA substrate and the enzyme modifying these substrates), since no visible increase in methylation was observed for ‘slow growth’ cultures in M9 minimal media at 20°C. Moreover, changes in 2′-O-methylation were observed only for a subset of possible tRNA substrates.
This finding is striking, since the effect of modifications in the structural core of the tRNA, such as Gm18, are known to increase tRNA stability (2–6,30,76), and thus the observed effect would be expected to enhance translation. This is in contrast with the typical stress response, namely a decrease or even a shutdown of translation (75,77–80). Polysome profiling of WT and ΔTrmH strains clearly points out that only mRNA steady state level is affected in the mutant, but not mRNA association to polysomes (translation). In contrast, tRNA steady-state level is not at all affected in the mutant, only preferential association of specific tRNAs to polysomes was observed. Hence a plausible hypothesis may be that increase of Gm18 content mostly impacts molecular events outside bacterial translation. In support of such hypothesis, we here documented a molecular mechanism that translates stress factors such as limited nutrient supply (starvation) or sub-lethal antibiotic stress, into molecular antagonists that inhibit RNA immunostimulation of the human innate immune system.
A logical next step, namely to address these findings in vivo, currently suffers from the lack of a suitable in vivo infection model. Given that the RNA/TLR7 axis is the only one in a large arsenal of PAMP/PRR systems (43,81) in the innate immune system, it stands to reason, that the contribution of tRNA to immunostimulation by living bacteria (46,82–84) might constitute an effect that is difficult to tease out in vivo. Clearly, while an assessment of the overall impact of bacterial Gm18 modulation under stress on infection remains to be characterized, we have here provide a causal chain along with a molecular mechanism that links exposure to antibiotics to a reduction of interferon emission by cells of the human innate immune system.
DATA AVAILABILITY
E. coli polysome profiling data are deposited to the European Nucleotide Archive, accession number PRJEB41080
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Pole BMS at Université de Lorraine for constant support.
Contributor Information
Adeline Galvanin, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA (UMR7365), F54000 Nancy, France.
Lea-Marie Vogt, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Antonia Grober, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Isabel Freund, Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lilia Ayadi, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA (UMR7365), F54000 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CNRS, INSERM, IBSLor (UMS2008/US40), Epitranscriptomics and RNA Sequencing Core Facility, F54000 Nancy, France.
Valerie Bourguignon-Igel, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA (UMR7365), F54000 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CNRS, INSERM, IBSLor (UMS2008/US40), Epitranscriptomics and RNA Sequencing Core Facility, F54000 Nancy, France.
Larissa Bessler, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Dominik Jacob, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Tatjana Eigenbrod, Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Virginie Marchand, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, INSERM, IBSLor (UMS2008/US40), Epitranscriptomics and RNA Sequencing Core Facility, F54000 Nancy, France.
Alexander Dalpke, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Mark Helm, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Yuri Motorin, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA (UMR7365), F54000 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CNRS, INSERM, IBSLor (UMS2008/US40), Epitranscriptomics and RNA Sequencing Core Facility, F54000 Nancy, France.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
Doctoral School ED BioSE (UL, Nancy) ‘Cotutelle’ PhD Fellowship (to A.G.); Grand Est Region FRCR project EpiARN (to Y.M.); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DA592/7 and SPP1784 to A.D., HE 3397/18-1 and SPP1784 to M.H.]; work was performed in frame of the EPITRAN COST initiative [CA16120]. Funding for open access charge:Université de Lorraine.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Boccaletto P., Machnicka M.A., Purta E., Piatkowski P., Baginski B., Wirecki T.K., de Crécy-Lagard V., Ross R., Limbach P.A., Kotter A. et al.. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:D303–D307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Motorin Y., Helm M.. tRNA stabilization by modified nucleotides. Biochemistry. 2010; 49:4934–4944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chernyakov I., Whipple J.M., Kotelawala L., Grayhack E.J., Phizicky E.M.. Degradation of several hypomodified mature tRNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by Met22 and the 5′-3′ exonucleases Rat1 and Xrn1. Genes Dev. 2008; 22:1369–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Motorin Y., Helm M.. RNA nucleotide methylation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA. 2011; 2:611–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. El Yacoubi B., Bailly M., de Crécy-Lagard V.. Biosynthesis and function of posttranscriptional modifications of transfer RNAs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2012; 46:69–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mauer J., Luo X., Blanjoie A., Jiao X., Grozhik A.V., Patil D.P., Linder B., Pickering B.F., Vasseur J.-J., Chen Q. et al.. Reversible methylation of m6Am in the 5′ cap controls mRNA stability. Nature. 2017; 541:371–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Agris P.F., Vendeix F.A.P., Graham W.D.. tRNA’s wobble decoding of the genome: 40 years of modification. J. Mol. Biol. 2007; 366:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yarian C., Townsend H., Czestkowski W., Sochacka E., Malkiewicz A.J., Guenther R., Miskiewicz A., Agris P.F.. Accurate translation of the genetic code depends on tRNA modified nucleosides. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277:16391–16395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Björk G.R., Durand J.M., Hagervall T.G., Leipuviene R., Lundgren H.K., Nilsson K., Chen P., Qian Q., Urbonavicius J.. Transfer RNA modification: influence on translational frameshifting and metabolism. FEBS Lett. 1999; 452:47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Urbonavicius J., Qian Q., Durand J.M., Hagervall T.G., Björk G.R.. Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications. EMBO J. 2001; 20:4863–4873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Begley U., Dyavaiah M., Patil A., Rooney J.P., DiRenzo D., Young C.M., Conklin D.S., Zitomer R.S., Begley T.J.. Trm9-catalyzed tRNA modifications link translation to the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. 2007; 28:860–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Karijolich J., Yi C., Yu Y.-T.. Transcriptome-wide dynamics of RNA pseudouridylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015; 16:581–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rose R.E., Pazos M.A., Curcio M.J., Fabris D.. Global epitranscriptomics profiling of RNA post-transcriptional modifications as an effective tool for investigating the epitranscriptomics of stress response. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2016; 15:932–944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Preston M.A., D’Silva S., Kon Y., Phizicky E.M.. tRNAHis 5-methylcytidine levels increase in response to several growth arrest conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 2013; 19:243–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Han L., Kon Y., Phizicky E.M.. Functional importance of Ψ38 and Ψ39 in distinct tRNAs, amplified for tRNAGln(UUG) by unexpected temperature sensitivity of the s2U modification in yeast. RNA. 2015; 21:188–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Alings F., Sarin L.P., Fufezan C., Drexler H.C.A., Leidel S.A.. An evolutionary approach uncovers a diverse response of tRNA 2-thiolation to elevated temperatures in yeast. RNA. 2015; 21:202–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Damon J.R., Pincus D., Ploegh H.L.. tRNA thiolation links translation to stress responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2015; 26:270–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chan C.T.Y., Dyavaiah M., DeMott M.S., Taghizadeh K., Dedon P.C., Begley T.J.. A quantitative systems approach reveals dynamic control of tRNA modifications during cellular stress. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6:e1001247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Carlson B.A., Xu X.-M., Gladyshev V.N., Hatfield D.L.. Selective rescue of selenoprotein expression in mice lacking a highly specialized methyl group in selenocysteine tRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280:5542–5548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dedon P.C., Begley T.J.. A system of RNA modifications and biased codon use controls cellular stress response at the level of translation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014; 27:330–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Endres L., Dedon P.C., Begley T.J.. Codon-biased translation can be regulated by wobble-base tRNA modification systems during cellular stress responses. RNA Biol. 2015; 12:603–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gu C., Begley T.J., Dedon P.C.. tRNA modifications regulate translation during cellular stress. FEBS Lett. 2014; 588:4287–4296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Duechler M., Leszczyńska G., Sochacka E., Nawrot B.. Nucleoside modifications in the regulation of gene expression: focus on tRNA. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016; 73:3075–3095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tuorto F., Lyko F.. Genome recoding by tRNA modifications. Open Biol. 2016; 6:160287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pollo-Oliveira L., de Crécy-Lagard V.. Can protein expression be regulated by modulation of tRNA modification profiles. Biochemistry. 2019; 58:355–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Phillips G., de Crécy-Lagard V.. Biosynthesis and function of tRNA modifications in Archaea. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011; 14:335–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Emilsson V., Näslund A.K., Kurland C.G.. Thiolation of transfer RNA in Escherichia coli varies with growth rate. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992; 20:4499–4505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kinghorn S.M., O’Byrne C.P., Booth I.R., Stansfield I.. Physiological analysis of the role of truB in Escherichia coli: a role for tRNA modification in extreme temperature resistance. Microbiology (Reading, Engl.). 2002; 148:3511–3520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Noon K.R., Guymon R., Crain P.F., McCloskey J.A., Thomm M., Lim J., Cavicchioli R.. Influence of temperature on tRNA modification in archaea: Methanococcoides burtonii (optimum growth temperature [Topt], 23 degrees C) and Stetteria hydrogenophila (Topt, 95 degrees C). J. Bacteriol. 2003; 185:5483–5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Murata M., Fujimoto H., Nishimura K., Charoensuk K., Nagamitsu H., Raina S., Kosaka T., Oshima T., Ogasawara N., Yamada M.. Molecular strategy for survival at a critical high temperature in Eschierichia coli. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e20063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chan C.T.Y., Deng W., Li F., DeMott M.S., Babu I.R., Begley T.J., Dedon P.C.. Highly predictive reprogramming of tRNA modifications is linked to selective expression of Codon-Biased genes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015; 28:978–988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sakai Y., Miyauchi K., Kimura S., Suzuki T.. Biogenesis and growth phase-dependent alteration of 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine in tRNA anticodons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:509–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Thompson K.M., Gottesman S.. The MiaA tRNA modification enzyme is necessary for robust RpoS expression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2014; 196:754–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Chionh Y.H., McBee M., Babu I.R., Hia F., Lin W., Zhao W., Cao J., Dziergowska A., Malkiewicz A., Begley T.J. et al.. tRNA-mediated codon-biased translation in mycobacterial hypoxic persistence. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7:13302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hori H. Transfer RNA methyltransferases with a SpoU-TrmD (SPOUT) fold and their modified nucleosides in tRNA. Biomolecules. 2017; 7:23. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ayadi L., Galvanin A., Pichot F., Marchand V., Motorin Y.. RNA ribose methylation (2′-O-methylation): Occurrence, biosynthesis and biological functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2019; 1862:253–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gehrig S., Eberle M.-E., Botschen F., Rimbach K., Eberle F., Eigenbrod T., Kaiser S., Holmes W.M., Erdmann V.A., Sprinzl M. et al.. Identification of modifications in microbial, native tRNA that suppress immunostimulatory activity. J. Exp. Med. 2012; 209:225–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jöckel S., Nees G., Sommer R., Zhao Y., Cherkasov D., Hori H., Ehm G., Schnare M., Nain M., Kaufmann A. et al.. The 2′-O-methylation status of a single guanosine controls transfer RNA-mediated Toll-like receptor 7 activation or inhibition. J. Exp. Med. 2012; 209:235–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kaiser S., Rimbach K., Eigenbrod T., Dalpke A.H., Helm M.. A modified dinucleotide motif specifies tRNA recognition by TLR7. RNA. 2014; 20:1351–1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Jung S., von Thülen T., Laukemper V., Pigisch S., Hangel D., Wagner H., Kaufmann A., Bauer S.. A single naturally occurring 2′-O-methylation converts a TLR7- and TLR8-activating RNA into a TLR8-specific ligand. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0120498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Rimbach K., Kaiser S., Helm M., Dalpke A.H., Eigenbrod T.. 2′-O-Methylation within bacterial RNA acts as suppressor of TLR7/TLR8 activation in human innate immune cells. J. Innate Immun. 2015; 7:482–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Eigenbrod T., Dalpke A.H.. Bacterial RNA: an underestimated stimulus for innate immune responses. J. Immunol. 2015; 195:411–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Freund I., Eigenbrod T., Helm M., Dalpke A.H.. RNA modifications modulate activation of innate Toll-Like receptors. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10:92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Tluk S., Jurk M., Forsbach A., Weeratna R., Samulowitz U., Krieg A.M., Bauer S., Vollmer J.. Sequences derived from self-RNA containing certain natural modifications act as suppressors of RNA-mediated inflammatory immune responses. Int. Immunol. 2009; 21:607–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Judge A.D., Bola G., Lee A.C.H., MacLachlan I.. Design of noninflammatory synthetic siRNA mediating potent gene silencing in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2006; 13:494–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Freund I., Buhl D.K., Boutin S., Kotter A., Pichot F., Marchand V., Vierbuchen T., Heine H., Motorin Y., Helm M. et al.. 2′-O-methylation within prokaryotic and eukaryotic tRNA inhibits innate immune activation by endosomal Toll-like receptors but does not affect recognition of whole organisms. RNA. 2019; 25:869–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Marchand V., Blanloeil-Oillo F., Helm M., Motorin Y.. Illumina-based RiboMethSeq approach for mapping of 2′-O-Me residues in RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:e135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Marchand V., Pichot F., Thüring K., Ayadi L., Freund I., Dalpke A., Helm M., Motorin Y.. Next-Generation Sequencing-Based RiboMethSeq protocol for analysis of tRNA 2′-O-Methylation. Biomolecules. 2017; 7:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pichot F., Marchand V., Ayadi L., Bourguignon-Igel V., Helm M., Motorin Y.. Holistic optimization of bioinformatic analysis pipeline for detection and quantification of 2′-O-Methylations in RNA by RiboMethSeq. Front. Genet. 2020; 11:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kellner S., Ochel A., Thüring K., Spenkuch F., Neumann J., Sharma S., Entian K.-D., Schneider D., Helm M.. Absolute and relative quantification of RNA modifications via biosynthetic isotopomers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:e142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kellner S., Neumann J., Rosenkranz D., Lebedeva S., Ketting R.F., Zischler H., Schneider D., Helm M.. Profiling of RNA modifications by multiplexed stable isotope labelling. Chem. Commun. (Camb.). 2014; 50:3516–3518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Thüring K., Schmid K., Keller P., Helm M.. Analysis of RNA modifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Methods. 2016; 107:48–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Galvanin A., Ayadi L., Helm M., Motorin Y., Marchand V.. Mapping and quantification of tRNA 2′-O-Methylation by RiboMethSeq. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019; 1870:273–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Drino A., Oberbauer V., Troger C., Janisiw E., Anrather D., Hartl M., Kaiser S., Kellner S., Schaefer M.R.. Production and purification of endogenously modified tRNA-derived small RNAs. RNA Biol. 2020; 17:1104–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Thüring K., Schmid K., Keller P., Helm M.. LC-MS analysis of methylated RNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017; 1562:3–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Baba T., Ara T., Hasegawa M., Takai Y., Okumura Y., Baba M., Datsenko K.A., Tomita M., Wanner B.L., Mori H.. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2006; 2:2006.0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S.. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Barker C.S., Prüss B.M., Matsumura P.. Increased motility of Escherichia coli by insertion sequence element integration into the regulatory region of the flhD operon. J. Bacteriol. 2004; 186:7529–7537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Helm M., Motorin Y.. Detecting RNA modifications in the epitranscriptome: predict and validate. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017; 18:275–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Motorin Y., Helm M.. Methods for RNA modification mapping using deep sequencing: established and new emerging technologies. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Huang H.-Y., Hopper A.K.. Multiple layers of stress-induced regulation in tRNA biology. Life (Basel). 2016; 6:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Huber S.M., Leonardi A., Dedon P.C., Begley T.J.. The versatile roles of the tRNA epitranscriptome during cellular responses to toxic exposures and environmental stress. Toxics. 2019; 7:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Wang Y., Pang C., Li X., Hu Z., Lv Z., Zheng B., Chen P.. Identification of tRNA nucleoside modification genes critical for stress response and development in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17:261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Agris P.F., Koh H., Söll D.. The effect of growth temperatures on the in vivo ribose methylation of Bacillus stearothermophilus transfer RNA. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1973; 154:277–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Miassod R., Cecchini J.P.. Partial base-methylation and other structural differences in the 17 S ribosomal RNA of sycamore cells during growth in cell culture. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1979; 562:292–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Rogg H., Müller P., Keith G., Staehelin M.. Chemical basis for brain-specific serine transfer RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1977; 74:4243–4247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Randerath E., Gopalakrishnan A.S., Gupta R.C., Agrawal H.P., Randerath K.. Lack of a specific ribose methylation at guanosine 17 in Morris hepatoma 5123D tRNASer1IGA. Cancer Res. 1981; 41:2863–2867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. van Delft P., Akay A., Huber S.M., Bueschl C., Rudolph K.L.M., Di Domenico T., Schuhmacher R., Miska E.A., Balasubramanian S.. The profile and dynamics of RNA modifications in animals. Chembiochem. 2017; 18:979–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Dong H., Nilsson L., Kurland C.G.. Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J. Mol. Biol. 1996; 260:649–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Berg O.G., Kurland C.G.. Growth rate-optimised tRNA abundance and codon usage. J. Mol. Biol. 1997; 270:544–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pang Y.L.J., Abo R., Levine S.S., Dedon P.C.. Diverse cell stresses induce unique patterns of tRNA up- and down-regulation: tRNA-seq for quantifying changes in tRNA copy number. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:e170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Maraia R.J., Arimbasseri A.G.. Factors that shape eukaryotic tRNAomes: processing, modification and Anticodon-Codon use. Biomolecules. 2017; 7:26. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Puri P., Wetzel C., Saffert P., Gaston K.W., Russell S.P., Cordero Varela J.A., van der Vlies P., Zhang G., Limbach P.A., Ignatova Z. et al.. Systematic identification of tRNAome and its dynamics in Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 2014; 93:944–956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Su D., Chan C.T.Y., Gu C., Lim K.S., Chionh Y.H., McBee M.E., Russell B.S., Babu I.R., Begley T.J., Dedon P.C.. Quantitative analysis of ribonucleoside modifications in tRNA by HPLC-coupled mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2014; 9:828–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Cai W.M., Chionh Y.H., Hia F., Gu C., Kellner S., McBee M.E., Ng C.S., Pang Y.L.J., Prestwich E.G., Lim K.S. et al.. A platform for discovery and quantification of modified Ribonucleosides in RNA: Application to Stress-Induced reprogramming of tRNA modifications. Meth. Enzymol. 2015; 560:29–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hori H., Suzuki T., Sugawara K., Inoue Y., Shibata T., Kuramitsu S., Yokoyama S., Oshima T., Watanabe K.. Identification and characterization of tRNA (Gm18) methyltransferase from Thermus thermophilus HB8: domain structure and conserved amino acid sequence motifs. Genes Cells. 2002; 7:259–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Christensen S.K., Mikkelsen M., Pedersen K., Gerdes K.. RelE, a global inhibitor of translation, is activated during nutritional stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98:14328–14333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Harding H.P., Novoa I., Zhang Y., Zeng H., Wek R., Schapira M., Ron D.. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. 2000; 6:1099–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Sheikh M.S., Fornace A.J.. Regulation of translation initiation following stress. Oncogene. 1999; 18:6121–6128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. de Nadal E., Ammerer G., Posas F.. Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011; 12:833–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Dalpke A., Helm M.. RNA mediated Toll-like receptor stimulation in health and disease. RNA Biol. 2012; 9:828–842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Sander L.E., Davis M.J., Boekschoten M.V., Amsen D., Dascher C.C., Ryffel B., Swanson J.A., Müller M., Blander J.M.. Detection of prokaryotic mRNA signifies microbial viability and promotes immunity. Nature. 2011; 474:385–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Gratz N., Hartweger H., Matt U., Kratochvill F., Janos M., Sigel S., Drobits B., Li X.-D., Knapp S., Kovarik P.. Type I interferon production induced by Streptococcus pyogenes-derived nucleic acids is required for host protection. PLoS Pathog. 2011; 7:e1001345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Vierbuchen T., Bang C., Rosigkeit H., Schmitz R.A., Heine H.. The human-associated archaeon Methanosphaera stadtmanae is recognized through its RNA and induces TLR8-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front. Immunol. 2017; 8:1535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
E. coli polysome profiling data are deposited to the European Nucleotide Archive, accession number PRJEB41080





