Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2020 Oct 3;11(4):390–394. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.62

Laser Therapy in Lumbar Disc Surgery – A Narrative Review

Behnam Hosseini 1, Farzad Allameh 2,*
PMCID: PMC7736948  PMID: 33425288

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most chronic debilitating conditions involving considerable loss of cash, work, and quality time. Lasers are utilized in different fields of drugs, providing unique advantages. They are useful and advantageous in treating lumbar disc disease. In this research, an attempt is made to examine the role and importance of different lasers in lumbar disc surgeries.

Methods: We conducted studies about laser therapy in lumbar disc surgery. Our primary search began with reviewing English-language citations from PubMed and Scopus between 1990 and 2019 using the keywords: (laser therapy) OR (lumbar disc AND disc surgery). The initial search yielded 97 articles. However, about 49 articles were selected and used in the present study.

Results: Based on the present study, it can be found that there are several methods of using lasers to treat lumbar disc surgery. These methods all have their strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusion: The development of laser lumbar disc surgery can be very helpful due to the reduction of surgical risks and the length of the patients’ hospital stay. However, the choice of method used for this type of surgery should be made according to the patient’s condition and based on the opinion of the treating physician.

Keywords: Lumbar discectomy, Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), Potassium titanium phosphate laser (KTP), Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser

Introduction

Once the intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus protrudes due to the weakness or rupture of the annulus fibrosus, lumbar disc herniation occurs.1 The hernia symptoms may include back or leg pain or a feeling of numbness and weakness in these areas of the body.2 This condition may lead to several complications, such as painful foot drop, bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina.3 The prevalence of lumbar disc herniation is reported to be about 5 to 20 per 1000 people annually (0.5%-2.0%). Based on the studies, most people experience this disease in the third to fifth decade of their lives, and its prevalence in men is almost twice as high as in women.4-7

Disc herniation often occurs as a result of a degenerative process in which the hydration rate of the nucleus pulposus decreases with age.8,9 Trauma, connective tissue disorders, and congenital diseases are among other causes of the disease.8,10-12

Today, more attention is paid to a variety of effective and modern treatments due to the increasing number of people with lumbar disc herniation. In many cases, treatments that do not require open surgery are more popular, with more limited side effects and risks. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate and report appropriate information on the safety and effectiveness of new methods.

In order to treat the symptoms of lumbar disc herniation, there are three types of approaches, including supportive therapy, percutaneous techniques, and open surgery.13-16 Further, lumbar discectomy can be effective if there is severe pressure on the nerve or in cases of persistent symptoms that do not respond to supportive care.14,15 In such cases, the surgical techniques used include open discectomy or existing minimally invasive procedures, using a laser and percutaneous endoscopy approach.17-20 Many factors such as the patient’s symptoms and the disc size and location can affect the treatment type.21

Open discectomy is the most common treatment for lumbar discectomy.22-25 The optimal treatment, however, is prescribed to minimize the invasion of the functional method, speed up the recovery of patients, and decrease complications during the recovery period. The reduction of laserdisc pressure in the form of percutaneous nucleotomy is based on the decrease in volume in a closed hydraulic space, resulting in a sharp drop in pressure.26 Evaporation and shrinkage of the nucleus pulposus can lead to a rapid reduction in nerve root pressure since water is the main component of the intervertebral disc, and the disc pain is caused by pressure from the disc protrusion in front of the nerve root.27-29

In the present study, different studies on the use of lasers in lumbar disc surgery are evaluated.

Materials and Methods

The studies were conducted on Laser therapy in lumbar disc surgery. Our primary search began with reviewing English-language citations of PubMed, Scopus, and Medline between 1990 and 2019 using the keywords: Laser therapy OR lumbar disc, Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression, AND Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. The initial search yielded 97 articles. Studies on Laser therapy in lumbar disc surgery were selected by reviewing abstracts. However, about 49 articles were selected and used in the present study.

Evidences

Types of Lumbar Disc Surgery Using a Laser

Two types of laser application were described in the literature: percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD). In Table 1 we summarized the characteristics of PELD and PLDD surgical methods.

Table 1. Comparison of the Characteristics of PELD and PLDD Surgical Methods .

Type of Laser Surgery Usage Situations Prohibiting Conditions Purpose Anesthesia Conditions Benefits
PELD Lumbar disc protrusion (complete annulus fibrosus), Subligamentous prolapse should cover less than 30% of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal and obstruction symptoms should not be seen30-32 Severe neurological impairment, CONUS and cauda syndromes, severe muscle paralysis (Grade II-0), segmental instability, legal contraindications due to mental disorders, and the obstruction of more than 30% of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal due to disc herniation and various types of nerve cramps 32-34 Reduction of the size of the protruding disc by exiting the nucleus pulposus35,36 Local anesthesia with the presence of an anesthesiologist to control the patient's vital parameters37 Minimal invasiveness, no need to be hospitalized, the possibility of discharge 24 hours after surgery, the possibility of a return to daily activities after 5 days, local anesthesia, high speed of execution, lack of spinal instability after surgery, less damage to the muscles of the back, applicability for patients at risk (e.g., those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease)
PLDD Evaporation of a small part of the inner nucleus, as well as the reduction of intra-disc pressure and disc herniation Local anesthesia with the presence of an anesthesiologist to control the patient's vital parameters37 Minimal invasiveness, no need to be hospitalized, the possibility of discharge 24 hours after surgery, the possibility of a return to daily activities after 5 days, local anesthesia, high speed of execution, lack of spinal instability after surgery, less damage to the muscles of the back, applicability for patients at risk ( e.g., those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease)

1. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

In the PELD method, the disc surface area is first determined for treatment under fluoroscopic control on the skin. Next, the disc space is punctured posterior-transversely at an angle of 50-60 degrees using an 18-degree cannula, inserted into the skin from the midline between 9 and 10 cm. The needle tip is placed in the disc center. At this point, discography is performed to eliminate conflicting morphological symptoms such as possible obstruction. From the opposite side, indeed, the disk space is drilled in the same way, and the two guide wires enter the disk space through the outgoing cannulas.

At the input points of the wires, two knife cuts are made. A Blunt trocar is guided through the central hole to the posterior border of the disc space using the wire as a guide. A cannula (00:5/4 mm) is considered as a guide with the separation of the trocar cone at the same time. Then, the disk space is opened on each side using a circular drill. Also, the parts of the nucleus pulpous are removed from the disc center, creating a hollow space to be used for endoscopic examination. One side of the disk space is exposed to the rigid endoscope of 30 or 70 degrees, while the endoscopic removal of the nucleus pulposus continues on the other side.

A flexible J. Lm 400 fiber with a laser is inserted into the disk space via an adjustable panel. Under endoscopic control, the nucleus pulposus tissue is then coagulated or evaporated, and its vapor is removed by continuous suction via the working tube.30

1. Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression

In PLDD, a thin 18G needle is inserted into the lower area of the protruding disc under X-ray or CT guidance. The optical fiber is inserted via the needle, and laser energy is transmitted via the fiber. This results in the evaporation of a small part of the disc nucleus. A partial vacuum is, therefore, created that removes the hernia from the nerve root, leading to pain relief.31

Types of Lasers Used in Disc Surgery

Three types of laser were used for the treatment of disc disease. Studies about these three types were summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. A Review of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Disc Surgery Lasers in Previous Research .
Type of Laser Author The Title of the Study Results
Nd: YAG laser Pfeiffer et al
Menchetti et al
Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy with and without chymopapain pretreatment versus non-automated, discoscopy-monitored percutaneous lumbar discectomy No significant side effects and radicular symptoms after using PELD treatment were observed, and the length of hospital stay was also reduced.44
Knight et al Percutaneous laser discectomy: experience and long-term follow-up Improving neurological symptoms (such as motor impairment and reflex disorder)45
Potassium Titanium Phosphate Laser Yeung AT Consideration for the use of the KTP laser for disc decompression and ablation The success rate of the applied method during this study was 84%. Also, no side effects were reported after using this laser.46
Ohnmeiss et al Laser disc decompression The results of this retrospective study showed that the removal of disc pressure with these lasers was successful, and incompatibility in the criteria for entering the study led to clinical failure.47
Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser Ahn et al Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases The use of lasers to lower blood pressure in L5-S1 L3-S1 duct stenosis can be relatively effective.48
Sherk et al Laser discectomy During this evaluation, no difference was observed between the treated and the control groups. Accordingly, the researchers found that laser discectomy was a safe procedure and effective in improving the symptoms of many patients.49

1. Nd: YAG Laser

This laser may be applied in non-contact or contact modes both. The Nd: YAG laser is more effective in the contact mode with 20-30 watts of power and a 0.05- to 0.1-second pulse according to studies.38 In the non-contact state, a 400 μm bare fiber with an energy density of 1.2 to 2 kW/cm2 with a fiber strength of 2 mm can be used; this results in the coagulation and shrinkage of the nucleus pulposus.39 In the contact mode, an energy density of 10 to 15.6 kW/cm can be applied to the tissue, leading to effective evaporation.40

2. Potassium Titanium Phosphate Laser

This laser uses optical fiber and is easily guided into the disk space via a spinal needle. Potassium, titanium, and phosphate (KTP) crystals also produce green lime laser light.41

3. Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser

This laser has a unique wavelength in the mid-infrared range, being well-absorbed by water. Since this laser is an optical fiber, an effective dose of energy can enter the disc through the needle or catheter as percutaneous by inducing fibers. The laser advantage is that it creates almost no temperature increase in adjacent tissues with a pulse width of about 250 ms and 10 Hz, as well as 1.6 joules of energy per pulse. A defect of 1 cm × 1.5 cm × 2 cm is created in the nucleus pulposus when 1200 J of Ho: YAG laser energy enters the disk through 400-μm fibers with the same parameters. This defect, located in the posterior quarter of the anterior part of the hernia area, can be identified by the guidance of a fluoroscopic needle in the disc.42,43

Conclusion

Knowledge of applying laser technologies to the spine is limited, and there are no prospective studies on the examination of connective tissue discectomy with typical micro lumbar discectomy or minimally invasive procedures. Such limitations make analyses challenging in the area. However, it is essential to conduct several studies on minimally invasive methods in the field of lumbar disc surgery. Meanwhile, using a laser and expanding this research can be very helpful.

Ethical Considerations

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Please cite this article as follows: Hosseini B, Allameh F. Laser therapy in lumbar disc surgery - a narrative review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(4):390-394. doi:10.34172/jlms.2020.62.

References

  • 1.Kamper SJ, Ostelo RW, Rubinstein SM, Nellensteijn JM, Peul WC, Arts MP. et al. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(5):1021–43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Suri P, Pearson AM, Zhao W, Lurie JD, Scherer EA, Morgan TS. et al. Pain recurrence after discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42(10):755–63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nubukpo-Guménu AA, Ségbédji FK, Rué M, Destandau J. Endospine surgery complications in lumbar herniated disc. World Neurosurg. 2018;119:e78–e79. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schroeder GD, Guyre CA, Vaccaro AR. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of lumbar disc herniations. Semin Spine Surg. 2016;28(1):2–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghorbanlo M, Mohaghegh MR, Yazdanian F, Mesbah M, Totonchi Z. A comparison between the hemodynamic effects of cisatracurium and atracurium in patient with low function of left ventricle who are candidate for open heart surgery. Med Arch. 2016;70(4):265–8. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.265-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim JH, van Rijn RM, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, de Boer MR, Ginai AZ. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown; a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018;26:37. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0207-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fiol AG. Disc Herniation. In: Mankowitz SKW, editor. Consults in Obstetric Anesthesiology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. p. 165-167. 10.1007/978-3-319-59680-8_46 [DOI]
  • 8.Yaman ME, Kazancı A, Yaman ND, Baş F, Ayberk G. Factors that influence recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Hong Kong Med J. 2017;23(3):258–63. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Amin RM, Andrade NS, Neuman BJ. Lumbar disc herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):507–16. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9441-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shimia M, Babaei-Ghazani A, Sadat BE, Habibi B, Habibzadeh A. Risk factors of recurrent lumbar disk herniation. Asian J Neurosurg. 2013;8(2):93–6. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.116384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozgen S, Konya D, Toktas OZ, Dagcinar A, Ozek MM. Lumbar disc herniation in adolescence. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(2):77–81. doi: 10.1159/000098377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vialle LR, Vialle EN, Henao JE, Giraldo G. Lumbar disc herniation. Rev Bras Ortop. 2010;45(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30211-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schoenfeld AJ, Weiner BK. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: evidence-based practice. Int J Gen Med. 2010;3:209–14. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s12270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dang L, Liu Z. A review of current treatment for lumbar disc herniation in children and adolescents. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):205–14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1202-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buttermann GR. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(4):670–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCulloch JA. Focus issue on lumbar disc herniation: macro- and microdiscectomy. Spine. 1996;21(24 Suppl):45S–56S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jahangirifard A, Salajegheh S, Arab S, Mirtajani SB, Farzanegan B. Thiamine could decrease lactate and creatinine level after coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with mild systolic dysfunction. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2018;3(4):136–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sobol E, Baskov A, Borshchenko I, Shekhter A. Low-invasive reconstruction of spine discs under thermo-mechanical effect of fiber laser. In: Madsen SJ, Yang VX, editors. Clinical and translational neurophotonics 2018: proceedings of the 2018 SPIE BiOS conference; 2018 Jan 27-Feb 1; San Francisco, USA: SPIE; 2018. p. 1048005.
  • 19.Mathews HH, Long BH. Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of intervertebral disk herniation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(2):80–5. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200203000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cole IV JS, Jackson TR. Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):539–44. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000290900.23190.C9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(6):672–6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schick U, Döhnert J, Richter A, König A, Vitzthum H. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(1):20–6. doi: 10.1007/s005860100315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mahjoubifard M, Heidari M, Dahmardeh M, Mirtajani SB, Jahangirifard A. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiol Resa Pract. 2020;2020:4814037. doi: 10.1155/2020/4814037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):623–8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1578-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rasouli MR, Rahimi‐Movaghar V, Shokraneh F, Moradi‐Lakeh M, Chou R. Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd010328.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(1):1–0. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kiaei MM, Mohaghegh MR, Movaseghi G, Ghorbanlo M. Enteral diclofenac controls pain and reduces intravenous injection during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Transl Myol. 2018;28(2):7353. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quigley MR. Percutaneous laser discectomy. Neurosurg Clin N AM. 1996;7(1):37–42. doi: 10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30402-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Totonchi Z, Salajegheh S, Mohaghegh MR, Kiaei MM, Shirvani M, Ghorbanlo M. Hemodynamic effect of intravenous lidocaine during aortic cannulation in cardiac surgery. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2017;9(2):56–60. doi: 10.1556/1646.9.2017.2.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lau D, Han SJ, Lee JG, Lu DC, Chou D. Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2011 Jan 1;18(1):81–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yoshikawa H, Andoh T, Tarumoto Y, Yamada R, Akihisa Y, Kudoh I. [Usefulness of epidural anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)] Masui. 2011;60(12):1370–7. [In Japanese]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mayer HM, Brock M, Berlien HP, Weber B. Percutaneous endoscopic laser discectomy (PELD). A new surgical technique for non-sequestrated lumbar discs. In: Bauer BL, Hellwig D, editors. Minimally invasive neurosurgery I. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 54. Vienna: Springer; 1992. p. 53-58. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6687-1_7 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):431–7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0219-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shinkai M, Ohhama Y, Take H, Fukuzato Y, Fujita S, Nishi T. Evaluation of the PELD risk score as a severity index of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(7):1001–4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00179-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Destandau J. A special device for endoscopic surgery of lumbar disc herniation. Neurol Res. 1999;21(1):39–42. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1999.11740889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fang G, Ding Z, Song Z. Comparison of the effects of epidural anesthesia and local anesthesia in lumbar transforaminal endoscopic surgery. Pain Physician. 2016;19(7):E1001–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Quigley MR, Shih T, Elrifai A, Maroon JC, Lesiecki ML. Percutaneous laser discectomy with the Ho: YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(6):621–4. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900120609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Quigley MR, Maroon JC, Shih T, Elrifai A, Lesiecki ML. Laser discectomy Comparison of systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19(3):319–22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199402000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38(3):363–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Knight M, Goswami A. Lumbar percutaneous KTP 532-nm laser disc decompression and disc ablation in the management of discogenic pain. In: Gerber BE, Knight MTN, Siebert WE, editors. Lasers in the musculoskeletal system. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 312-316. 10.1007/978-3-642-56420-8_50 [DOI]
  • 41.Gottlob C, Kopchok GE, Peng SK, Tabbara M, Cavaye D, White RA. Holmium:YAG laser ablation of human intervertebral disc: preliminary evaluation. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(1):86–91. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900120113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Agarwal S, Bhagwat AS. Ho: Yag laser-assisted lumbar disc decompression: a minimally invasive procedure under local anesthesia. Neurol India. 2003;51(1):35–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Casper GD, Hartman VL, Mullins LL. Results of a clinical trial of the holmium:YAG laser in disc decompression utilizing a side‐firing fiber: A two‐year follow‐up. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(1):90–6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:1<90::AID-LSM10>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pfeiffer M, Schäfer T, Griss P, Mennel HD, Arndt D, Henkel K. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy with and without chymopapain pretreatment versus non-automated discoscopy-monitored percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109(4):211–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00453143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Menchetti PPM, Canero G, Bini W. Percutaneous laser discectomy: experience and long-term follow-up. In: Alexandre A, Masini M, Menchetti PPM, editors. Advances in minimally invasive surgery and therapy for spine and nerves. Vienna: Springer; 2011. p. 117-121. 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_18 [DOI]
  • 46.Yeung A, Lewandrowski KU. Early and staged endoscopic management of common pain generators in the spine. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH. Laser disc decompression The importance of proper patient selection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19(18):2054–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(16):E326–32. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134591.32462.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sherk HH, Black J, Rhodes A, Lane G, Prodoehl J. Laser discectomy. Clin Sports Med. 1993;12(3):569–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES