Abstract
Background
This phase 1b study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiviral effects of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)–specific fusion inhibitor JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) in hospitalized RSV-infected patients aged > 1 to ≤24 months.
Methods
Patients categorized by age (cohort 1: ≥6 to ≤24 months; cohort 2: ≥3 to < 6 months; cohort 3: > 1 to < 3 months) were randomized to oral JNJ-8678 or placebo once daily for 7 days. Dose increases followed data review committee recommendations (cohort 1: 2/6/8/9 mg/kg; cohort 2: 1.5/4.5/6 mg/kg; cohort 3: 1/3/5 mg/kg). Cohort 1 included a 9 mg/kg dose, as target exposures were not reached at lower doses. Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were assessed using population pharmacokinetics modeling. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. To assess antiviral effects, RSV RNA viral load from nasal swabs was quantified over time using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Patients received JNJ-8678 (n = 37) or placebo (n = 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar at the highest doses for cohorts 1–3 (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time of administration up to 24 hours postdosing at day 7: 35 840, 34 980, and 39 627 ng × hour/mL, respectively). Two grade 3 AEs were reported (both bronchiolitis; 1 JNJ-8678, 1 placebo), reported as serious AEs; all other AEs were grade 1 or 2. Two additional serious AEs were reported (rhinitis [JNJ-8678]; pneumonia [placebo]). No deaths, grade 4 AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Median RSV viral load change from baseline in JNJ-8678 vs placebo by day 3 was −1.98 vs −0.32 log10 copies/mL.
Conclusions
In RSV-infected infants, JNJ-8678 was well tolerated. Target exposures were reached and antiviral activity was observed.
Clinical Trials Registration
Keywords: respiratory syncytial virus, fusion inhibitor, JNJ-53718678, JNJ-8678, infants
Treatment options directed toward respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are limited. This first-in-child dose-escalation study of the direct-acting RSV antiviral treatment JNJ-53718678, demonstrated the potential for effective regimens, with an acceptable safety profile, to treat pediatric patients with RSV infection.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of serious lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants, and is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide [1, 2]. Globally in 2015, an estimated 3.2 million hospital admissions and 59 600 deaths were due to severe RSV LRTIs in children < 5 years old [1].
Although RSV infection is usually self-limiting, certain populations have a greater risk of severe disease (eg, infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital heart disease) [3–5]. While these children are at particular risk of serious RSV infection, studies have shown that most serious episodes occur among otherwise healthy children born close to the RSV season [4], and infection rates peak in infants aged ≤ 3 months [5].
No direct-acting treatments are approved for RSV-associated bronchiolitis or pneumonia [2, 6, 7]. Options are limited to prophylaxis with palivizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody with restricted indications, or aerosolized ribavirin, a nonspecific antiviral treatment [8–11]. The American Academy of Pediatrics does not recommend ribavirin to treat children with bronchiolitis [12]. The current standard of care for RSV infection is supportive treatment, which may include oxygenation and/or mechanical ventilation [6, 7, 13–15].
JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) is an RSV-specific fusion inhibitor and a potential new treatment for RSV [16]. In vitro, JNJ-8678 showed potent activity against a panel of laboratory-derived and clinically isolated RSV-A and RSV-B strains (50% effective concentration, 0.09–9.50 ng/mL) [16]. In a human challenge study involving healthy volunteers, JNJ-8678 administered as a single dose (25–1000 mg) or multiple doses (250 mg every 24 hours, 500 mg every 24 hours, or 250 mg every 12 hours; fed conditions for 8 days) was well tolerated [17]. When healthy volunteers received 75–500 mg once daily [QD] for 7 days, JNJ-8768 substantially reduced both viral load and clinical disease severity. No clear exposure-response relationship was observed among the active doses [18]. However, as participants start experimental treatment in human challenge studies soon after they are infected with RSV, it remains to be seen how these outcomes translate to natural RSV infection.
This first-in-child phase 1b study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple oral doses of JNJ-8678 in infants (>1 to ≤24 months of age) hospitalized with RSV infection, as well as safety/tolerability after 7 days of treatment. Since JNJ-8678 was previously generally well tolerated, with PK parameters stable over multiple doses and little accumulation over time in healthy adult volunteers [17], a multiple-dose escalation design was employed. Secondary objectives included the antiviral effects of JNJ-8678 and its impact on the clinical course of RSV infection.
METHODS
Patient Selection
Patients were infants born after a normal-term pregnancy (≥ 37 weeks) aged > 1 to ≤24 months, hospitalized ≤ 72 hours prior to randomization with RSV respiratory tract infection diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based assay. Patients were stratified by age (≥6 to ≤24 months [cohort 1]; 3 to < 6 months [cohort 2]; >1 to < 3 months [cohort 3]). For full selection criteria and PCR-based assay performance characteristics, see the Supplementary Materials.
Study Design
This phase 1b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, multiple ascending-dose study was conducted over 2 parts (Figure 1). Patients were randomized 4:1 on day 1 to oral JNJ-8678 or placebo for 7 days, except for the first dose cohort of each age group in which all patients received JNJ-8678. For full details on administration procedures, see the Supplementary Materials. All patients were evaluated for 28 days postrandomization.
Figure 1.
Study design. Patient disposition (parts 1 and 2) at time of the final analysis for each dose cohort. Within each age group (cohorts 1–3) and dose level (cohorts a–d, f), patients were randomized to JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) or placebo (except for cohorts 1a, 2a, and 3a, who all received JNJ-8678). Data were categorized by dose level for analysis: low (cohorts 1a, 2a, and 3a), mid (cohorts 1b, 2b, and 3b), mid-high (cohort 1c), and high (cohorts 1d, 2c, and 3c). aStudy drug was administered for 7 days. bPlanned randomization active: placebo was 2:1. cPlanned randomization active: placebo was 4:1. dThe target dose regimen for part 2 of cohort f was not yet determined when the study was terminated. eThis age group had to include overall at least 5 patients > 1 month and ≤ 2 months of age over the first 3 cohorts combined, with a minimum of 1 patient > 1 month and ≤ 2 months of age in each of these cohorts. Abbreviations: DRC, data review committee, PK, pharmacokinetic; QD, once daily.
The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki, and local regulatory requirements. Patients’ legally acceptable representatives provided written informed consent for study participation. The study protocol and amendment(s) were reviewed by an independent ethics committee.
Study enrollment was interrupted in March 2017 following regulatory authority concerns about the suitability of the JNJ-8678 formulation for a pediatric population, in regards to its excipients and low pH. The study was prematurely terminated in November 2017, with last observation on 21 March 2017, due to the timing of availability of a newly developed formulation and the seasonality of the disease.
Part 1
Part 1 primarily assessed the PK profile and safety of JNJ-8678. Each age cohort (cohorts 1–3) comprised a minimum of 3 dose cohorts, and could be expanded with 2 additional dose cohorts per age group designed to safely increase dose levels until the target exposures were reached (ie, cohorts a–c, expanded to cohorts d and e if needed).
Dose escalation from cohort 1a to cohorts 1b, 2a, and 3a was dependent on PK and safety/tolerability data evaluation by a Data Review Committee (DRC). All available data were reviewed by the DRC once patients in each dose cohort completed treatment. The target dose to be achieved for each age group was the dose that achieved the targeted mean exposure (ie, similar to the mean exposure observed in adults treated with 500 mg of JNJ-8678 QD represented as an area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time of administration up to 24 hours postdosing [AUC24h] of 31 165 ng · hour/mL).
From day 3 onward, patients could be discharged from hospital after dosing and completion of the required assessments for that day, if considered appropriate by the investigator. For patients discharged before day 7, the parent(s)/caregiver(s) administered the study drug at home until day 7. Following hospital discharge, viral load samples were not collected until the day 7 visit.
Part 2
Part 2 was added by study amendment to increase patient numbers so as to better estimate the antiviral effects of JNJ-8678. A single dose level was selected for evaluation in each age group (that which reached the target exposure in part 1 after review of the PK and safety/tolerability data and recommendation of the DRC). Planned randomization was 2:1 (JNJ-8678:placebo). Due to early study discontinuation, part 2 did not reach completion.
Outcomes
The primary objectives were to evaluate PK, safety, and tolerability of multiple oral JNJ-8678 doses after administration for 7 days in infants hospitalized with RSV infection.
Secondary objectives included the antiviral activity of JNJ-8678 and its impact on the clinical course of RSV infection, as assessed by the clinician. Exploratory objectives included evaluation of JNJ-8678’s effect of on the clinical course of RSV infection during and following hospitalization (as assessed by the patient’s parent[s]/caregiver[s] and development of viral resistance during JNJ-8678 treatment).
Assessments
PK assessments obtained with the population PK (pop-PK) model, originally developed in adults and subsequently scaled for pediatrics, were based on sparse sampling (heel or finger-prick capillary tube samples); further defined in the Supplementary Materials.
Safety/tolerability evaluations were based on adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and physical examination. The Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Pediatric Toxicity Tables (version November 2007) were used to grade AEs and laboratory and ECG abnormalities, as this was the only available toxicity table applicable to the age range studied [19].
Pharmacodynamics (PD) assessments were based on observed antiviral activity and evaluation of the clinical course of RSV infection. RSV viral load was measured from midturbinate nasal swab samples using an RSV quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR assay.
Viral resistance analyses were performed based on next-generation sequencing (NGS; Illumina) of the full-length F-gene at baseline and postbaseline in selected samples if RSV viral load was above the limit for NGS. Viral load (including performance characteristics) and resistance assessments are further defined in the Supplementary Materials. The clinical course of RSV infection was assessed based on length of hospital stay and time to clinical stability (maximum of time to end supplemental oxygen, time to end of supplemental feeding, and time to normalization of heart and respiratory rates). To evaluate RSV-related symptoms, Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS) questionnaires were completed separately by the clinician and the parent(s)/caregiver(s) on an electronic device. All questions presented to clinicians and parent(s)/caregiver(s) are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Sample Size and Statistical Analysis
Cohorts were grouped by dose level: low (cohorts 1a, 2a, and 3a), mid (cohorts 1b, 2b, and 3b), and high (cohorts 1d, 2c, and 3c). Cohort 1c (mid to high) results were presented separately due to the target exposures not being reached, which prevented combining the data with either mid- or high-dose cohorts; however, cohort 1c is included in assessments of all patients receiving JNJ-8678 (Figure 1).
Details of the PK analysis set, safety analysis set, and their parameters are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
In part 1, for each age group, the sample size required to achieve at least 80% power was ≥ 9 patients for linear clearance and ≥6 patients for the central volume of distribution. In part 2, the required sample size in the JNJ-8678 groups was 24 patients receiving the selected dose, pooled over all 3 age groups. Further details on sample size calculations are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
The study was not powered to evaluate the impact of JNJ-8678 on the clinical course of RSV infection.
RESULTS
The study was conducted in 10 countries. Of 61 patients screened, 44 were randomized to JNJ-8678 (n = 37) or placebo (n = 7). All treated patients completed the study. At the time of study termination, part 2 had opened for recruitment in cohorts 1 and 3, but only 1 patient in cohort 3 had received study drug (placebo).
Demographics and baseline characteristics were broadly similar across treatment groups, but with imbalances in some categories (Table 1). The median baseline viral load was higher in the JNJ-8678 (combined) group than placebo.
Table 1.
Summary of Baseline Characteristics and Demographics
| JNJ-53718678 | Placebo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Low | Mid | Mid-high | High | All Cohorts | All Cohorts |
| Analysis (safety) set, No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Female sex, No. (%) | 4 (33) | 6 (50) | 2 (50) | 5 (56) | 17 (46) | 6 (86) |
| Age at randomization, mo, median (range) | 4.4 (2–11) | 3.6 (1–11) | 8.7 (6–12) | 4.8 (1–20) | 4.8 (1–20) | 3.4 (2–14) |
| White race, No. (%) | 6 (50) | 8 (67) | 4 (100) | 8 (89) | 26 (70) | 4 (57) |
| Time between start of respiratory infection and first dosing, d, median (range) | 5 (3–7) | 5 (4–8) | 5 (3–7) | 7 (2–9) | 5 (2–9) | 5 (3–12) |
| RSV viral load at baseline, log10 copies/mL, median (range) | 4.89 (2.14–7.96) | 4.71 (2.14–8.30) | 5.37 (2.88–6.66) | 5.73 (5.24–7.12) | 5.30 (2.14–8.30) | 4.65 (3.69–5.64) |
| RSV subtype, No. (%) | ||||||
| A | 4 (33) | 8 (67) | 3 (75) | 4 (44) | 19 (51) | 4 (57) |
| B | 8 (67) | 4 (33) | 1 (25) | 5 (56) | 18 (49) | 3 (43) |
Abbreviation: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Pharmacokinetic Results
At the highest doses by cohort of 9, 6, and 5 mg/kg QD (cohorts 1d, 2c, and 3c, respectively), the estimated AUC24h and minimum and maximum plasma concentration (Cmin and Cmax) values were similar or slightly higher than the corresponding PK parameters observed for 500 mg JNJ-8678 QD in adults (Table 2). In patients aged ≥6–≤24 months treated with 8 mg/kg QD (cohort 1c), AUC24h was similar to adults; however, the Cmin and Cmax target exposures were not reached. Therefore, the DRC recommended a higher dose (9 mg/kg QD) in this age group (cohort 1d). AUC values were similar between cohorts 1c and 1d, with cohort 1d achieving target exposures.
Table 2.
Summary of JNJ-53718678 Pharmacokinetic Parameters, by Dose Cohort
| Mean AUC24h, ng × h/mL (CV%) | Mean Cmin, ng/mL (CV%) | Mean Cmax, ng/mL (CV%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Dose, mg/kg | No. | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 1 | Day 7 |
| 1a | 2 | 4 | 6047.2 (17.5) | 7738.8 (27.4) | 81.4 (58.8) | 114.0 (77.7) | 546.8 (35.7) | 721.3 (31.2) |
| 1b | 6 | 4 | 18 067.6 (59.7) | 26 482.4 (15.1) | 155.5 (89.3) | 225.7 (66.5) | 1960.5 (58.1) | 3304.2 (12.3) |
| 1c | 8 | 4 | 28 655.3 (23.6) | 33 528.7 (32.2) | 244.1 (90.4) | 323.9 (95.7) | 3346.9 (13.0) | 4298.8 (11.2) |
| 1d | 9 | 4 | 24 971.7 (43.8) | 35 840.1 (22.6) | 333.2 (62.3) | 615.9 (75.2) | 2371.8 (70.8) | 3389.4 (52.9) |
| 2a | 1.5 | 4 | 6658.4 (25.6) | 8620.9 (17.3) | 88.3 (39.2) | 124.0 (49.1) | 727.5 (68.7) | 938.0 (53.3) |
| 2b | 4.5 | 4 | 26 345.5 (11.8) | 28 904.2 (32.3) | 319.8 (16.9) | 363.0 (18.9) | 2533.2 (25.0) | 3021.8 (41.2) |
| 2c | 6 | 1 | 30 484.8 (…) | 34 980.3 (…) | 428.6 (…) | 517.3 (…) | 2556.8 (…) | 3131.0 (…) |
| 3a | 1 | 4 | 4495.6 (4.8) | 5827.0 (12.3) | 72.6 (41.1) | 100.9 (46.3) | 374.2 (18.5) | 498.0 (13.2) |
| 3b | 3 | 4 | 14 741.1 (13.9) | 26 135.3 (14.1) | 342.9 (14.3) | 650.2 (15.5) | 958.2 (15.2) | 1671.2 (14.6) |
| 3c | 5 | 4 | 22 800.2 (6.8) | 39 627.7 (26.4) | 458.7 (54.9) | 929.0 (62.1) | 1866.6 (51.7) | 3001.8 (25.1) |
In adults, mean AUC24h was 31 165 ng × hour/mL (CV%, 40.7); mean Cmin was 460 ng/mL (CV%, 82.4); and mean Cmax was 2655 ng/mL (CV%, 22.3).
Abbreviations: AUC24h, area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time of administration up to 24 hours postdosing; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Cmin, minimum plasma concentration; CV%, coefficient of variation; PK, pharmacokinetics.
Safety
Most patients had ≥ 1 AE (76% [28/37] and 86% [6/7] treated with JNJ-8678 and placebo, respectively), most of which were grade 1 or 2 (Table 3). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent AEs are listed in Table 3. Overall, AEs considered by the investigator to be at least possibly related to JNJ-8678 were reported in 30% (11/37) of patients, including anemia (n = 1, cohort 3b, mid-dose; 3 mg/kg QD) and leukocytosis (n = 1, cohort 3c, high-dose; 5 mg/kg QD) (Table 3). Two grade 3 AEs were reported; both were bronchiolitis and reported as serious AEs (SAEs) (Table 3). No deaths, grade 4 AEs, or AEs leading to study discontinuation or permanent discontinuation of study drug were reported.
Table 3.
Summary Table of Adverse Events
| JNJ-53718678 | Placebo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event | Low | Mid | Mid-High | High | All Cohorts | All Cohorts |
| Analysis (safety) set, No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Any AE | 9 (75) | 10 (83) | 2 (50) | 7 (78) | 28 (76) | 6 (86) |
| Any worst grade 1 or 2 AE | 9 (75) | 10 (83) | 2 (50) | 7 (78) | 28 (76) | 5 (71) |
| Any worst grade 3 or 4 AE | 0 | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 1 (14) |
| Serious AEa | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5) | 2 (29) |
| Any AE possibly related to placebo/JNJ-53718678 | 3 (25) | 4 (33) | 2 (50) | 2 (22) | 11 (30) | 0 |
| Any AE probably related to placebo/JNJ-53718678 | 0 | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 0 |
| Most frequent AEs (> 5%) | ||||||
| Vomiting | 0 | 3 (25) | 1 (25) | 4 (44) | 8 (22) | 4 (57) |
| URTI | 1 (8) | 4 (33) | 0 | 3 (33) | 8 (22) | 0 |
| Soft feces | 2 (17) | 3 (25) | 2 (50) | 0 | 7 (19) | 0 |
Data are presented as no. (%).
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.
aSerious due to rehospitalization in the follow-up phase and considered not related to study drug by the investigator.
Four SAEs were reported (JNJ-8678, n = 2; placebo, n = 2; Table 3). In the JNJ-8678 group, SAEs reported were bronchiolitis (8% [1/12], cohort 1b, mid-dose; 6 mg/kg QD) and rhinitis (8% [1/12], cohort 3a, low-dose; 1 mg/kg QD). All 4 were reported as SAEs because of rehospitalization, but not considered related to study drug by the investigator. For patients who received placebo, 1 SAE each of pneumonia and bronchiolitis were reported.
Treatment-emergent nongraded and graded laboratory abnormalities were infrequent across treatment groups (Table 4) and were of low severity (Table 5). No clinically relevant differences in instances of vital sign abnormalities or ECG abnormalities were observed between groups. No dose-level relationship was observed for AEs, laboratory, ECG, or vital sign abnormalities.
Table 4.
Laboratory Safety: Tabulation of Treatment-emergent Nongraded Abnormalities Observed in at Least 5% of the Patients Receiving JNJ-53718678
| JNJ-53718678 | Placebo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Test | Low | Mid | Mid-high | High | All | All Cohorts |
| Analysis (safety) set, No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Chemistry | ||||||
| Alkaline phosphatase | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Below | 0 | 2 (17) | 1 (25) | 0 | 3 (8) | 1 (14) |
| Above | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5) | 0 |
| Bicarbonate | ||||||
| No. | 11 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 6 |
| Below | 0 | 2 (17) | 1 (25) | 3 (38) | 6 (17) | 3 (50) |
| Above | 1 (9) | 2 (17) | 0 | 0 | 3 (9) | 0 |
| Chloride | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Below | 0 | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 1 (14) |
| Above | 1 (8) | 2 (17) | 2 (50) | 0 | 5 (14) | 1 (14) |
| Urea | ||||||
| No. | 9 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 33 | 7 |
| Below | 1 (11) | 4 (33) | 0 | 0 | 5 (15) | 1 (14) |
| Above | 1 (11) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 0 |
| Hematology | ||||||
| Activated partial prothrombin time | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 36 | 7 |
| Above | 3 (25) | 0 | 1 (25) | 1 (11) | 5 (14) | 0 |
| Eosinophils | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 7 |
| Below | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (14) |
| Above | 4 (33) | 2 (18) | 1 (25) | 0 | 7 (20) | 1 (14) |
| Eosinophils/leukocytes | ||||||
| No. | 9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5 |
| Below | 0 | 0 | 1 (25) | 0 | 1 (4) | 1 (20) |
| Above | 2 (22) | 3 (33) | 1 (25) | 1 (25) | 7 (27) | 1 (20) |
| Erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Below | 2 (17) | 1 (8) | 1 (25) | 0 | 4 (11) | 0 |
| Above | 0 | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 0 |
| Erythrocytes | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Below | 0 | 2 (17) | 0 | 1 (11) | 3 (8) | 0 |
| Above | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | 2 (50) | 0 | 4 (11) | 1 (14) |
| Leukocytes | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Above | 1 (8) | 2 (17) | 0 | 3 (33) | 6 (16) | 1 (14) |
| Lymphocytes | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 36 | 7 |
| Below | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (14) |
| Above | 2 (17) | 2 (18) | 1 (25) | 1 (11) | 6 (17) | 1 (14) |
| Lymphocytes/leukocytes | ||||||
| No. | 9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5 |
| Below | 0 | 1 (11) | 0 | 0 | 1 (4) | 1 (20) |
| Above | 2 (22) | 3 (33) | 0 | 1 (25) | 6 (23) | 1 (20) |
| Monocytes/leukocytes | ||||||
| No. | 9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5 |
| Below | 2 (22) | 1 (11) | 0 | 0 | 3 (12) | 0 |
| Above | 2 (22) | 3 (33) | 0 | 0 | 5 (19) | 0 |
| Neutrophils/leukocytes | ||||||
| No. | 9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 5 |
| Below | 3 (33) | 3 (33) | 0 | 0 | 6 (23) | 1 (20) |
| Above | 0 | 1 (11) | 0 | 0 | 1 (4) | 1 (20) |
Data are presented as no. (%).
Table 5.
Laboratory Safety: Tabulation of Treatment-emergent Worst Toxicity Grades Observed in at Least 5% of the Patients Receiving JNJ-53718678
| JNJ-53718678 | Placebo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Test | Low | Mid | Mid-High | High | All Cohorts | All Cohorts |
| Hyperkalemia | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 6 |
| Grade 1 | 4 (33) | 3 (25) | 2 (50) | 1 (11) | 10 (27) | 4 (67) |
| Grade 2 | 0 | 1 (8.3) | 0 | 1 (11) | 2 (5) | 0 |
| Hypoglycemia | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Grade 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (33) | 3 (8) | 1 (14) |
| Hyponatremia | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Grade 2 | 1 (8) | 0 | 1 (25) | 1 (11) | 3 (8) | 0 |
| Hemoglobin | ||||||
| No. | 12 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 37 | 7 |
| Grade 1 | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5) | 1 (14) |
| Grade 2 | 0 | 1 (8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 0 |
Data are presented as no. (%). Emergent abnormalities that occurred during both treatment phase and follow-up period are included.
Antiviral Effect and Resistance Analyses
The median viral load and median (interquartile range) changes from baseline over time for JNJ-8678 by dose level and placebo are presented in Figure 2A and 2B, respectively. Across the JNJ-8678 dose levels, no clear dose-response relationship was observed for the antiviral effects of JNJ-8678; therefore, data were combined and compared with placebo; combined results are presented in Figure 2C and 2D, respectively. By day 3, the median viral load had declined by 1.98 log10 copies/mL from baseline in the JNJ-8678 (combined) group and 0.32 log10 copies/mL in the placebo group (Figure 2C). As patients could be discharged from hospital from day 3, a limited number of patients had viral load results between day 4 and day 6. By the day 7 follow-up visit, viral load in most samples (around 80% of patients, Supplementary Figure 1) had become negative (target not detected) or could not be quantified (target detected).
Figure 2.
A, Median viral load over time to day 7 by treatment group and placebo. B, Median (and IQR) viral load changes from baseline over time by dose level and placebo. C, JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) median viral load over time to day 7 viral load changes from baseline over time in all doses combined. D, JNJ-8678 median (and IQR) viral load over time to day 7 viral load changes from baseline over time in all doses combined. For respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A, the limit of detection (LOD) was 2.75 log10 copies/mL and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 3.00 log10 copies/mL; for RSV-B, the LOD was 1.89 log10 copies/mL and the LLOQ was 2.40 log10 copies/mL. Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
The least squares differences in change from baseline of JNJ-8678 by dose level and combined groups compared with placebo are summarized in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, respectively, and Supplementary Figure 2. No marked differences in viral load kinetics between RSV-A and RSV-B were observed (Supplementary Figure 3).
Baseline F-gene sequencing data were available for 30 of 44 patients (25/37 receiving JNJ-8678 and 5/7 placebo). Paired baseline and postbaseline sequencing data were available for 16 of 44 patients (14/37 receiving JNJ-8678 and 2/7 placebo). None of these patients had baseline polymorphisms or emerging genetic variations during or after treatment, when considering the 8 F-protein positions of specific interest for JNJ-8678 or the 20 F-protein positions of interest for the RSV-fusion inhibitor class, except 1 placebo patient who had a baseline V144I polymorphism (further described in the Supplementary Materials).
Clinical Course and Severity of Infection
Median length of hospital stay was similar between JNJ-8678 (combined) (77.7 hours) and placebo (77.5 hours); the maximum length of hospital stay observed was 150.4 hours and 144.5 hours, respectively (Figure 3A). No difference was observed between JNJ-8678 (combined) and placebo in median time to clinical stability following the start of study treatment (47.4 and 56.7 hours, respectively); all patients were clinically stable after 123.5 hours and 121.1 hours, respectively (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier graphs of length of hospital stay (A) and time to clinical stability (B), all JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) doses combined vs all placebo doses. Clinical stability was defined as maximum of time to end supplemental oxygen, time to end of supplemental feeding, time to normalized heart rate, and time to normalized respiratory rate.
No differences in evaluation of RSV symptoms were observed between JNJ-8678 (combined) and placebo, as assessed by the clinician and parent(s)/caregiver(s) through PRESORS.
DISCUSSION
In this first report of any direct-acting RSV antiviral treatment in a pediatric population, target JNJ-8678 exposures were reached in the dose cohorts evaluating the highest doses in each age group, providing potentially effective dose regimens for future studies. Our study design allowed target exposures to be readily identified: Patients were categorized by age (≥6 to ≤24 months; ≥3 to < 6 months; > 1 to < 3 months), and each age group started at a low dose (weight-based for each group), before a DRC reviewed PK and safety/tolerability data upon completion of treatment, to decide upon the initiation and dose of the next cohort. Treatment with JNJ-8678 administered for 7 days was well tolerated and, importantly, there were no new safety signals in this pediatric population compared with previous studies in healthy adults. Reported AEs were symptoms not uncommon in infants and typical of those which present during RSV infection [20].
There was a greater reduction in viral load with JNJ-8678 than placebo, suggesting a rationale to clinically evaluate JNJ-8678 for the treatment of RSV infection. However, the sample size was small, particularly for patients receiving placebo. Therefore, larger studies are needed to confirm viral load course; such studies should be powered to assess effects in clinical outcomes, to ascertain the clinical relevance of the JNJ-8678 antiviral effects. In addition, the small sample size did not allow detailed statistical analysis to model the PK/PD relationship, as recommended in the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines; however, this will be assessed in phase 2 (NCT03656510) and phase 3 trials. In a previous challenge study in adults, no clear dose-response relationship was observed across JNJ-8678 dose levels [18]. However, longitudinal RSV dynamics in RSV-infected infants are very different from those in adults, with higher peak viral loads and longer duration of shedding exhibited in children, due to factors favoring prolonged RSV replication [21, 22]. Hence, future PK/PD studies in infants are crucial.
No JNJ-8678 treated patients with F-gene sequencing data available had baseline polymorphisms or emerging genetic variations associated with reduced in vitro susceptibility to JNJ-8678 during or after treatment. Further studies are needed to fully investigate the clinical resistance profile of JNJ-8678.
Study enrollment was halted following concerns raised by regulatory authorities regarding the suitability of the JNJ-8678 formulation used in this study for a pediatric population. However, these concerns were related to the pH and excipients of the formulation and not the active compound of JNJ-8678. Given the timing of availability of a newly developed oral formulation compliant with regulatory authority requirements, and given the seasonal nature of RSV disease, the sponsor took the decision to terminate the study prematurely in November 2017. Despite the premature study termination, the sample size was reached for the PK and safety analyses (part 1), and as such we consider our conclusions to be valid.
It is widely recognized that RSV is the leading cause of severe LRTIs in infants worldwide for which treatment options are limited [13, 14, 23, 24]. Ribavirin remains the only licensed antiviral agent against RSV infection; however, it is currently only approved in some countries and its use remains controversial [12, 25]. Given that there are doubts over ribavirin’s efficacy and concerns over its safety profile, there is a clear need for alternative options for the treatment of RSV infection [13, 14]. Ribavirin is also associated with challenges when administered intravenously or by aerosol; therefore, oral solutions such as JNJ-8678 offer practical benefits in a clinical setting [25]. In addition to JNJ-8678, a number of other direct-acting RSV antivirals have been identified [26–34]. While several, like JNJ-8678, continue development, the future of presatovir and BTA-C585 remains in doubt due to failure to meet viral load endpoints [33, 34]. Current treatments for RSV infection remain largely supportive [13, 14], highlighting the need for new therapies, particularly for pediatric populations where the incidence of RSV-related hospitalization is high.
The current study has also demonstrated that JNJ-8678 has an acceptable safety profile within the pediatric population. As such, a phase 2 study is ongoing to further evaluate the safety, antiviral activity, and clinical course of a newly formulated JNJ-8678 oral suspension in a pediatric population [35].
In conclusion, during this first-in-child study of JNJ-8678, target exposures were reached and treatment was well tolerated. These findings support further clinical development of JNJ-8678 as a potential new treatment for RSV infection.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Notes
Acknowledgments. Writing support was provided by Samantha McKenna of Zoetic Science, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare plc, and was funded by Janssen Pharmaceutica, NV.
Financial support. This work was supported by Janssen Pharmaceutica, NV.
Potential conflicts of interest. F. M.-T. has received honoraria from GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Seqirus, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings, and for acting as speaker in congresses outside the scope of the submitted work; has also acted as principal investigator in randomized controlled trials of the above-mentioned companies, as well as Ablynx, Regeneron, Roche, Abbott, Novavax, and MedImmune, with honoraria paid to his institution; and has also received support for research activities from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Proyecto de Investigación en Salud, Acción Estratégica en Salud): project GePEM ISCIII/PI16/01478/Cofinanciado FEDER, and project ReSVinext ISCIII/PI16/01569/Cofinanciado FEDER; Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia [RHI07/2-intensificación actividad investigadora, PS09749 and 10PXIB918184PR]; and Intensificación de la actividad investigadora 2007–2012, PI16/01569); Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI070069/PI1000540) del plan nacional de I+D+I and “fondos FEDER”; and 2016-PG071 Consolidación e Estructuración REDES 2016GI-1344 G3VIP (Grupo Gallego de Genética Vacunas Infecciones y Pediatría, ED341D R2016/021). E. B. reports personal fees from AbbVie, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Novartis, and Janssen, outside the submitted work. F. F. has received research funds from Janssen Pharmaceutica. S. R., D. H., B. R., J. V., K. M., and M. S. are all employees of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and may own stock in Johnson & Johnson. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Shi T, McAllister DA, O’Brien KL, et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2015: a systematic review and modelling study. Lancet 2017; 390:946–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86:408–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Feltes TF, Sondheimer HM. Palivizumab and the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus illness in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007; 7:1471–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Blumkin AK, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations among children less than 24 months of age. Pediatrics 2013; 132:e341–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sommer C, Resch B, Simões EA. Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. Open Microbiol J 2011; 5:144–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season, U.S., 2011–2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/Features/dsRSV/. Accessed 02 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Simões EA, DeVincenzo JP, Boeckh M, et al. Challenges and opportunities in developing respiratory syncytial virus therapeutics. J Infect Dis 2015; 211(Suppl 1):S1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. European Medicines Agency. Palivizumab—summary of product characteristics. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/synagis-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 9. US Food and Drug Administration. Palivizumab—product information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2002/palimed102302LB.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Electronic Medicines Compendium. Ribavirin—summary of product characteristics. Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/7108/smpc. Accessed 15 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 11. US Food and Drug Administration. Ribavirin—product information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/021511s023lbl.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2014; 134:e1474–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mazur NI, Martinón-Torres F, Baraldi E, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Network (ReSViNET) Lower respiratory tract infection caused by respiratory syncytial virus: current management and new therapeutics. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3:888–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wainwright C. Acute viral bronchiolitis in children—a very common condition with few therapeutic options. Paediatr Respir Rev 2010; 11:39–45; quiz 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2014; 134:e1474–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Roymans D, Alnajjar SS, Battles MB, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of a respiratory syncytial virus fusion inhibitor. Nat Commun 2017; 8:167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Huntjens DRH, Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan S, Brochot A, Rusch S, Stevens M, Verloes R. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of JNJ-53718678, a novel fusion inhibitor for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus: results from a phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled first-in-human study in healthy adult subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56:1331–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stevens M, Rusch S, DeVincenzo J, et al. Antiviral activity of oral JNJ-53718678 in healthy adult volunteers challenged with respiratory syncytial virus: a placebo-controlled study. J Infect Dis 2018; 218:748–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Available at: https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/dmidpedtox.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2019.
- 20. Bracht M, Basevitz D, Cranis M, Paulley R. Impact of respiratory syncytial virus: the nurse’s perspective. Drugs R D 2011; 11:215–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Brint ME, Hughes JM, Shah A, et al. Prolonged viral replication and longitudinal viral dynamic differences among respiratory syncytial virus infected infants. Pediatr Res 2017; 82:872–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lau JW, Kim YI, Murphy R, et al. Deep sequencing of RSV from an adult challenge study and from naturally infected infants reveals heterogeneous diversification dynamics. Virology 2017; 510:289–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nair H, Nokes DJ, Gessner BD, et al. Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 375:1545–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Geoghegan S, Erviti A, Caballero MT, et al. Mortality due to respiratory syncytial virus. burden and risk factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195:96–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pelaez A, Lyon GM, Force SD, et al. Efficacy of oral ribavirin in lung transplant patients with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28:67–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kim Y‐I, Pareek R, Murphy R, et al. The antiviral effects of RSV fusion inhibitor, MDT‐637, on clinical isolates, vs its achievable concentrations in the human respiratory tract and comparison to ribavirin. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2017; 11:525–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. DeVincenzo J, Tait D, Oluwayi O, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral RV521 in a human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) phase 2a challenge study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 197:A7715. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Toovey S, Wu J, Wang V, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers of the anti-RSV antiviral AK0529. First International Meeting on Respiratory Pathogens. Singapore: International Society for Influenza and other Respiratory Virus Diseases, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Brookes DW, Coates M, Allen H, et al. Late therapeutic intervention with a respiratory syncytial virus L-protein polymerase inhibitor, PC786, on respiratory syncytial virus infection in human airway epithelium. Br J Pharmacol 2018; 175:2520–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Coakley E, Ahmad A, Larson K, et al. LB04 EDP-938, a novel RSV N-inhibitor, administered once or twice daily was safe and demonstrated robust antiviral and clinical efficacy in a healthy volunteer challenge study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6(Suppl 2):S995. [Google Scholar]
- 31. DeVincenzo JP, Whitley RJ, Mackman RL, et al. Oral GS-5806 activity in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:711–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. DeVincenzo JP, McClure MW, Symons JA, et al. Activity of oral ALS-008176 in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2048–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chemaly RF, Dadwal SS, Bergeron A, et al. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of presatovir for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic-cell transplant recipients [manuscript published online ahead of print 3 December 2019]. Clin Infect Dis 2019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. GlobeNewswire. Aviragen therapeutics announces top-line results from phase 2a RSV challenge study of BTA585. Aviragen press release. 2017. Available at: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/02/01/913102/0/en/Aviragen-Therapeutics-Announces-Top-Line-Results-from-Phase-2a-RSV-Challenge-Study-of-BTA585.html. Accessed 22 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 35. ClinicalTrials.gov. Study to evaluate safety and antiviral activity of doses of JNJ-53718678 in children (≥28 days to ≤3 years) with respiratory syncytial virus infection. NCT03656510. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03656510?term=NCT03656510&rank=1. Accessed 22 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.