Abstract
HOXA transcript antisense RNA myeloid-specific 1 (HOTAIRM1) is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) that plays a pivotal role in regulating myeloid cell development via targeting HOXA1 gene expression. We and others have previously shown that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells, expand during chronic viral (HCV, HIV) infections. However, the role of HOTAIRM1 in the development and suppression of MDSCs during viral infection remains unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that the expressions of HOTAIRM1 and its target HOXA1 are substantially upregulated to promote the expressions of immunosuppressive molecules, including arginase 1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and reactive oxygen species, in CD33+ myeloid cells derived from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. We show that HCV-associated exosomes (HCV-Exo) can modulate HOTAIRM1, HOXA1, and miR124 expressions to regulate MDSC development. Importantly, overexpression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 in healthy CD33+ myeloid cells promoted the MDSC differentiation and suppressive functions; conversely, silencing of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 expression in MDSCs from HCV patients significantly reduced the MDSC frequency and their suppressive functions. In essence, these results indicate that the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1-miR124 axis enhances the differentiation and suppressive functions of MDSCs and may be a potential target for immunomodulation in conjunction with antiviral therapy during chronic viral infection.
Subject terms: Immunology, Diseases, Medical research
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is characterized by a high rate (> 80%) of chronic infection1,2 and thus it has become an excellent model for studying the mechanisms of virus-induced host immune dysfunction and viral chronicity in humans. While the use of direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents can efficiently clear HCV infection, these therapeutic drugs faces new issues such as viral mutation, relapse, and reinfection following treatment3,4. According to the CDC report, the number of HCV-related deaths has reached an all-time high, surpassing 60 other nationally reportable infectious diseases combined, making hepatitis C the number one reportable infectious disease that kills people in the United States5. Therefore, further studying the mechanisms that can dampen host immunity to permit viral persistence is essential to better managing chronic viral infections.
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells generated due to aberrant myelopoiesis under various pathological conditions, such as cancer, inflammatory and infectious diseases6–8. While MDSCs may contribute to immune homeostasis via limiting excessive inflammatory processes, their expansion may be at the expense of pathogen elimination, and thus they promote persistent infection8. We and others have previously reported that MDSCs expansion can inhibit T cell function in multiple disease models, including chronic HCV and HIV infections9–16. However, the mechanisms that drive MDSCs differentiation and suppressive functions during viral infection remain unclear.
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are genomic transcripts > 200-nt in length that do not encode proteins but possess regulatory functions17–19. By using RNA sequencing and annotation of the GENECODE project20, thousands of lncRNAs have been discovered recently, but their functions have not been well-characterized. Of note, the expression of lncRNAs is species-, cell-, and disease stage-specific17–19. The HOXA gene cluster, which is specifically expressed in the myeloid lineage, has been shown to generate lncRNAs with transcriptional regulatory functions in myelopoiesis21–23. Mechanistically, a class of transcripts in the HOXA region, termed HOTAIR, act in trans to control target gene expression remotely by recruiting histone methyltransferases21, whereas other HOXA intergenic transcripts act in cis to control neighboring HOXA genes22,23. Particularly, HOXA transcript antisense RNA myeloid-specific 1 (HOTAIRM1) is an intergenic lncRNA encoded in the HOXA gene cluster, and appears to be the most prominent lncRNA upregulated during granulocyte differentiation and myeloid cell maturation24–26. While the regulatory effects of HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 axis on hematopoiesis, leukemogenesis, and oncogenesis have been reported27–31, the potential roles of HOTAIRM1 in controlling viral infections, especially via regulation of MDSCs differentiation and function during HCV infection, remain largely unknown.
In this study, we characterized the expression and function of lncRNAs in MDSCs development. We found that HOTAIRM1 is upregulated during HCV infection and drives MDSCs expansion through regulating HOXA1 and miR124 expressions. We also found that HCV-containing exosomes (HCV-Exo) dysregulate the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1-miR124 axis, playing an important role in regulating the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs. Our study reveals a novel mechanism of immune dysregulation during chronic viral infection.
Materials and methods
Subjects
The study protocol was approved by the joint Institutional Review Board (IRB) of East Tennessee State University and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center (ETSU/VA IRB, Johnson City, TN). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The study subjects were composed of two populations: 50 chronically HCV-infected individuals and 54 healthy subjects (HS). HCV genotype (70% type 1, 30% type 2 or 3) and viral load (ranging from 17,000 ~ 17,000,000 IU/ml) were performed by Lexington VAMC, and all subjects were virologically and serologically positive for HCV prior to antiviral treatment. Healthy subjects were negative for HBV, HCV, and HIV infections, and blood buffy coats were obtained from Key Biologics (Memphis, TN) or Physician Plasma Alliance LLC (Gray, TN).
Cell isolation, culture, and flow cytometric analysis
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood using Ficoll density gradients (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). CD33+ cells were isolated from PBMCs using a CD33+ Cell Isolation Kit and a MidiMACS Separator column (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 2 mM l-glutamine (Thermo Scientific, Logan, Utah) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cell depletion and cell culture with exosomes were carried out as described previously13–16. Flow cytometry analysis of cell phenotypes and intracellular cytokines in PBMCs was carried out as described previously16. The following reagents were used: anti-CD4-FITC (Biolegend), anti-IFN-γ-PE (Biolegend), anti-CD33-PE(Biolegend), anti-CD14-APC (Biolegend), anti-HLA-DR-FITC (Biolegend), anti-CD3-APC (Biolegend), anti-Arg1-PE (Biolegend), anti-pSTAT3-PerCP (Biolegend) and anti-iNOS-PE (Novus biologicals) along with isotype control antibodies (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA). Levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in myeloid cells were measured using the H2DCFDA-based kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The stained cells were acquired on an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR). Isotype control antibodies (eBioscience) and fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were used to determine the background levels of staining and adjust multicolor compensation as gating strategy.
Exosome isolation and purification
Plasma was purified from 50 ml of whole blood from the research subjects and filtered to exclude particles larger than 0.8 μm, using syringe filters (Millipore Millex-AA Cat. No: SLAA033SS, Billerica, MA). Exosomes were then isolated from plasma by a differential centrifugation method as previously described15,16.
lncRNA, miRNA arrays, and RT-PCR validation
CD33+ myeloid cells were purified from PBMCs as described above. Total cellular RNA from CD33+ cells was isolated using the miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The RNA quality and quantity were analyzed using a BioPhotometer spectrophotometer UV/VIS, and RNA integrity was determined using gel electrophoresis. lncRNAs were analyzed using the Arraystar gene array service. The miScript miRNA array was performed by Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, CA)15. To validate the results for up- or down-regulated miRNAs by real-time PCR, cDNA was generated from total RNA by the Taqman advanced miRNA cDNA synthesis kit and the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific, Logan, Utah). The miRNA expression levels were assessed by RT-PCR using Taqman fast advanced master mix (Thermo Scientific) and the CFX96 RT-PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, CA). The miRNA levels were determined using the 2−ΔΔct relative quantification method and were normalized to internal control miR-191 or U6 RNA (SNORD61).
Transfection and co-culture experiments
For miR124 inhibition, CD33+ cells isolated from PBMCs of HS were transfected with 30 pmol of miR124 inhibitor, or negative control. For HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 silencing, the cells were transfected with 50 nM HOTAIRM1 SMART pool siRNA, HOXA1 SMART pool siRNA, or a pool of scrambled siRNA (Lafayette, CO, USA). For HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 overexpression, the CD33+ cells were transfected with HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 expression plasmid containing GFP (GenScript). Transfection efficiency was checked by flow cytometry 2 days after transfection. The transfection of miRNA or siRNA was performed using the Human Monocyte Nucleofector Kit and Nucleofector II Device (Lonza, Allendale, NJ) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfected cells were cultured for 2 days in IMEM medium (Lonza, Allendale, NJ) with 10% FBS. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry or RT-PCR. For CD4+ T cell co-culture, autologous CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml each; BD Bioscience) for 2 days in IMEM complete medium, followed by adding the transfected CD33+ cells (at 1:2 ratio) for another two days.
Statistical analysis
The parametric data are presented as mean ± SEM. Comparison between two groups was analyzed using unpaired t test with Welch’s correction after checking the value of F test. One-tail paired t-test was used to compare two groups. The nonparametric data (Fig. 3F) are presented as median with interquartile range and were analyzed by a one-tail Mann Whitney test. P-values < 0.05 or P < 0.01 were considered significant or very significant, respectively.
Results
MDSCs expand during chronic HCV infection
MDSCs play a critical role in disease progression by suppressing host immune responses6–8,32. The phenotypic marker of immature myeloid cells (CD33+ HLA-DR−/low) is a characteristic feature of human suppressive MDSCs, which are further categorized into monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) based on the differential expression of the CD14 and CD15 markers, respectively33,34. We have recently reported an expansion of M-MDSCs, which inhibited T cell functions via promoting regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation during chronic viral infections13–16. To better understand the role of MDSCs in chronic HCV infection, we further analyzed the frequencies of MDSCs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from HCV patients and HS controls by flow cytometry. We found that the frequencies of G-MDSCs (CD33+ HLA-DR−/low CD14−) were also increased in PBMCs in individuals with chronic HCV infection when compared to healthy subjects (HS) (Fig. 1A).
HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 are upregulated in MDSCs during chronic HCV infection
To determine whether lncRNAs play any role in MDSC expansion during HCV infection, we analyzed the transcripts of lncRNAs and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in myeloid cells isolated from HCV-infected individuals and HS using the Arraystar gene array analysis. Among the lncRNAs analyzed (shown as scatter plot in Fig. 1B), 760 lncRNAs (red dots) were upregulated (> twofold), 296 lncRNAs (green dots) were downregulated, and 27,435 lncRNAs (black dots) remain unchanged in myeloid cells from HCV subjects compared to HS. Given the critical role of HOTAIRM1 in granulocyte differentiation and myeloid cell maturation24–26, we analyzed the HOTAIRM1 expression in gene array results and validated the results by RT-PCR, which revealed a fivefold increase in myeloid cells derived from HCV-infected individuals (Fig. 1C).
Among the mRNA analyzed (shown as scatter plot in Fig. 1D), 213 mRNAs (red dots) were upregulated, 115 mRNAs (green dots) were downregulated, and 18,087 mRNA transcripts remained unchanged (within a twofold limit). Notably, the mRNA array analysis showed a significant upregulation of HOXA1 (the HOTAIRM1 target gene) in CD33+ cells derived from HCV subjects and the results were validated by RT-PCR that showed a fivefold increase in HCV subjects (Fig. 1E). Importantly, the levels of HOTAIRM1 were positively correlated with HOXA1 expression according to Pearson Correlation analysis (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these results suggest that expressions of HOTAIRM1 and its target gene HOXA1 are concurrently upregulated and may serve as a biomarker for MDSC expansion during HCV infection.
Immunosuppressive molecules are elevated in MDSCs during chronic HCV infection
MDSCs suppress immune responses by producing immunosuppressive mediators, such as arginase 1 (Arg1), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Arg1 is constitutively expressed in granulocytes and represents a novel antimicrobial effector through arginine depletion in the phagolysosome35. iNOS catalyzes the production of superoxide and free radical nitric oxide as an immune regulator36. STAT3 is a transcription factor and plays a pivotal role in MDSC differentiation and suppressive functions13–16. ROS activate anti-oxidative pathways and induce transcriptional programs that regulate the differentiation and function of MDSCs as a part of a major mechanism to suppress T cell responses36. To determine the mechanisms by which MDSCs exert their immunosuppressive effects during HCV infection, we measured the mRNA levels of those molecules that are implicated in myeloid cell differentiation and functions. As shown in Fig. 2A, gene array analysis showed upregulation of STAT3, NOS3, NOS2, and Arg1 mRNA levels in CD33+ cells isolated from HCV patients. These findings were validated by RT-PCR, which revealed a 5 fold increase in Arg1 (Fig. 2B), a tenfold increase in iNOS (Fig. 2C), a 2.5-fold increase in STAT3 (Fig. 2D), and we also found a 2.6-fold increase in ROS production (Fig. 2E). Of note, the Arg1 and STAT3 levels positively correlated with HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 expression levels in these subjects (Fig. 2F–I), suggesting the possibility that HCV-induced MDSCs may suppress immune responses by upregulating these immunosuppressive molecules through the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 axis during HCV infection.
miR124 expression negatively correlates with HOTAIRM1 levels in MDSCs during HCV infection
In addition to lncRNAs, miRNAs are also involved in myelopoiesis orchestrated by interdependent interactions between cytokine receptors and transcription factors8,37–39. We and others have previously shown that miRNAs dysregulate myelopoiesis to generate MDSCs15,16,39–42. To identify specific miRNAs that could affect myelopoiesis during HCV infection, we profiled miRNA expressions in CD33+ cells isolated from HCV patients and HS15. Expression of miRNAs that were significantly dysregulated per the miRNA array results was confirmed by RT-PCR. Amongst the dysregulated miRNAs, we found that miR124 was significantly inhibited and its level negatively correlated with HOTAIRM1 expression (Fig. 3A–B), whereas miR21 was significantly upregulated and positively correlated with HOTAIRM1 expression (Fig. 3C–D). Although miR30 was the most down-regulated miRNA, as determined by gene array analysis and RT-PCR, it did not correlate with the HOTAIRM1 expression (Fig. 3E). Also, miR181, which we have previously shown to be downregulated to promote T cell senescence through upregulation of DUSP643, was significantly increased in CD33+ cells during HCV infection, but did not correlate with the HOTAIRM1 expression (Fig. 3F). Expression of miR155, a miRNA that we have shown to be upregulated in NK cells to control their functions through regulating the Tim-3 pathway44, was also upregulated in myeloid cells during HCV infection but did not correlate with the HOTAIRM1 expression (data not shown). These data suggest that miR124 expression is negatively correlated to the HOTAIRM1 levels in MDSCs during HCV infection.
HCV-Exo regulates miR124 and HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 expressions in MDSCs during HCV infection
Exosomes are membrane-bound extracellular microvesicles and serve as carriers to transfer various signaling molecules (such as viral RNA, mRNA or ncRNA) among cells without direct cell-to-cell contact, thus playing an important role in regulating immune responses45–48. Notably, the human tetraspanin CD81, a receptor for the HCV E2 glycoprotein, is enriched in exosomes49. HCV genomic materials can be released from infected hepatocytes into peripheral blood in the form of circulating exosomes, and these molecules can exploit the fusogenic capabilities of the exosomes with other cells to transmit HCV-RNA and to dysregulate the immune responses, even in the presence of neutralizing antibodies50–52. We have recently shown that exosomes isolated from the plasma of HCV patients contain HCV-RNAs that promote MDSC expansion to inhibit T cell function16. To determine whether HCV-Exo can induce the molecular changes we observed in CD33+ cells, we isolated exosomes from the plasma of HCV subjects with high or low viral load (HCV RNA = 17,000,000, or 17,000, named as HCVhigh-Exo, or HCVlow-Exo, respectively) and HS (HS-Exo). These exosomes were added to cultures of healthy PBMCs for 5 days, followed by the selection of CD33+ cells from the PBMCs. Similar to our observations in CD33+ cells isolated from HCV and HS, RT-PCR analysis showed that miR124 was downregulated (Fig. 3G), whereas miR21 was significantly upregulated (Fig. 3H) in healthy CD33+ cells treated with HCVhigh-Exo compared to HS-Exo treatment. Also, miR30 was downregulated, whereas miR181 and miR155 were upregulated, but their expressions did not correlate with the HOTAIRM1 levels (data not shown). Additionally, while both HCVhigh-Exo and HCVlow-Exo increased HOTAIRM1 (Fig. 3I) and HOXA1 (Fig. 3J) expressions, only HCVhigh-Exo treatment led to a significant increase in HOTAIRM1 expression in CD33+ cells. Notably, among the HCV-Exo-induced alterations in miRNA and HOTAIRM1 expression, miR124 negatively correlated with HOTAIRM1 expression (Fig. 3K), whereas miR21 positively correlated with HOTAIRM1, though these correlations were not statistically significant (Fig. 3L). Moreover, HCV-Exo moderately upregulated the expression levels of Arg1 (Fig. 3M), iNOS (Fig. 3N), STAT3 (Fig. 3O), and ROS production (Fig. 3P), however, these changes were also not statistically significant. These results suggest that HCV-Exo plays a role in differential regulation of miR124, miR21, HOTAIRM1, and HOXA1 expressions during HCV infection.
HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 regulate each other to control miR124 expression in MDSCs
To elucidate the cause-effect interrelationships between HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 and miR124/miR21 expressions, we transfected HS-derived CD33+ cells with HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 expressing plasmids, followed by measuring their levels and miRNA expressions. As shown in Fig. 4A, HOTAIRM1 levels were upregulated (~ fourfold) in myeloid cells 5 days after HOTAIRM1 transfection. Interestingly, HOTAIRM1 expression was also upregulated (~ fourfold) by HOXA1 transfection, suggesting that HOXA1 may function as a transcription factor that positively regulates HOTAIRM1 expression. While transfection of HOXA1 upregulated (~ fivefold) HOXA1 levels, ectopic expression of HOTAIRM1 upregulated (~ sevenfold) HOXA1 levels (Fig. 4B), indicating that HOTAIRM1 enhances HOXA1 expression. Importantly, overexpression of either HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 moderately downregulated miR124 levels (Fig. 4C), but only slightly upregulated miR21 expression (Fig. 4D). Overexpression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 also slightly upregulated Arg1, iNOS, and STAT3 expressions (Fig. 4E-G).
In contrast to their overexpression, silencing of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 gene expressions by specific siRNAs transfection into CD33+ cells from HCV patients significantly reduced the levels of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 (Fig. 4H-I), further verifying the positive correlation between HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1. Silencing of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 also significantly downregulated Arg1, iNOS, and STAT3 levels, but upregulated miR124 level in HCV-CD33+ cells, which was decreased during chronic HCV infection (Fig. 4J–M), indicating the importance of HOTAIRM1/HOXA1 in controlling MDSCs’ suppressive functions. These results further demonstrate that HOTAIRM1/HOXA1 regulate the expression of immunosuppressive mediators/molecules in MDSCs during HCV infection.
Given that HOTAIRM1/HOXA1 expression appears to regulate miR124 level, we transfected CD33+ cells from HS with miR124 inhibitor and then examined HOTAIRM1/HOXA1 expressions. As shown in Fig. 4N, miR124 expression was significantly inhibited by the transfection of CD33+ cells with miR124 inhibitor. Notably, HOTAIRM1 (~ fivefold) and HOXA1 (~ 3.5-fold) expressions in CD33+ cells were upregulated by a miR124 inhibitor (Fig. 4O–P); correspondingly, the STAT3 level was upregulated (~ 2.5-fold) by transfection of CD33+ cells with the miR124 inhibitor (Fig. 4Q). In essence, our results suggest that HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 positively regulates each other to control miR124 expression and enhance the immunosuppressive mediators in MDSCs, whereas miR124 may also feedback regulate HOTAIRM1, HOXA1, and STAT3 expressions in these cells.
Ectopic expression of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 promotes MDSC differentiation and suppressive functions
Given the critical role of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 in myeloid cell differentiation, we hypothesized that ectopic expression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 could induce MDSC development to suppress T cell functions. To test this hypothesis, we transfected healthy CD33+ cells with GFP-HOTAIRM1 or GFP-HOXA1 constructs or control plasmid (GFP-pCDNA3.1) for 3 days and then analyzed myeloid cell differentiation and the expression of immunosuppressive molecules. As shown in Fig. 5A, with transfection efficiency between 43%-66%, flow cytometry revealed that overexpression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 resulted in a marked increase in myeloid cell differentiation. Compared to the empty vector control transfection, overexpression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 in CD33+ myeloid cells resulted in an immunosuppressive phenotype, as evidenced by the higher levels of HLA-DR− expression, a feature of MDSCs (Fig. 5B). Also, the expression levels of suppressive molecules, such as Arg1, iNOS, pSTAT3, and ROS were upregulated in the differentiated cells (Fig. 5C–F). These results suggest that the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 axis promotes MDSC differentiation and suppressive functions.
Silencing of HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 expressions reduce MDSC frequencies and suppressive functions
We next asked whether silencing HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1expression can attenuate the HCV-induced MDSC expansion and immunosuppression. To this end, we transfected CD33+ cells derived from HCV subjects with HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 siRNA. Compared to the control, HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 siRNA significantly reduced the frequencies of CD33+ HLA-DR− MDSCs (Fig. 6A). Transfection of these siRNAs also reduced the levels of immunosuppressive molecules Arg1, iNOS, pSTAT3, and ROS (Fig. 6B–E). Importantly, IFN-γ production by autologous CD4 T cells was restored when they were cultured with CD33+ cells with HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 silencing (Fig. 6F). Taken together, these results indicate that MDSC differentiation and suppressive functions can be attenuated by inhibiting the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 pathway.
Targeting the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 axis in MDSCs affects the T cell functions
To further consolidate the finding of MDSCs on suppressing T cell responses, we depleted CD33+ cells from PBMCs derived from HCV subjects. As shown in Fig. 7A, depletion of CD33+ cells from HCV PBMCs significantly increased the production of INF-γ in CD3+CD4+ T cells. This is consistent with our previous observations that IFN-γ production in CD4 T cells was enhanced by depleting CD33+ cells from PBMCs derived from virally infected subjects13–16. To further reveal the role of the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 axis in regulating MDSC suppressive function, we overexpressed HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 in healthy CD33+ cells, and then co-cultured them with autologous CD4 T cells for 3 days, followed by measurement of IFN-γ production in activated CD4 T cells. As shown in Fig. 7B, IFN-γ production was significantly suppressed in CD4 T cells co-cultured with CD33+ cells expressing HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1. These results support a role of HOTAIRM1-HOXA1 in promoting the MDSC immunosuppressive effect on T cell functions.
Discussion
MDSCs have been shown to expand and inhibit host immunity in multiple disease models9–16; however, the mechanisms that regulate MDSC development during viral infection remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that the expression of lncRNA HOTAIRM1 and its target, the HOXA1 gene, are upregulated in MDSCs that accumulate during chronic HCV infection. Notably, the upregulation of HOTAIRM1 is closely associated with the expression of immunosuppressive molecules in MDSCs. Interestingly, HOTAIRM1 upregulation is induced by HCV-Exo, which can also downregulate miR124, and HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 and can control miR124 expression in myeloid cells. Importantly, overexpression of HOTAIRM1 or HOXA1 in healthy CD33+ myeloid cells promotes MDSC differentiation and immunosuppressive functions. In contrast, silencing their expressions in MDSCs derived from HCV-infected subjects attenuates immunosuppressive functions. Based on these findings and our previous studies13–16, we propose a model (Fig. 7C) illustrating the role and mechanisms of HOTAIRM1 in promoting MDSC development to suppress the host immune response during HCV infection. According to this model, HCV-Exo can induce MDSC differentiation and their production of immunosuppressive molecules, such as Arg1, iNOS, pSTAT3, and ROS via promoting the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1-miR124 axis. HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 can regulate each other in a positive loop to control miR124 expression and MDSC development, which in turn, suppresses T cell functions, thereby potentially contributing to viral persistence and vaccine non-responsiveness during chronic HCV infection.
Although our results show that HOTAIRM1/HOXA1 is upregulated and promote MDSC development during HCV infection, the underlying mechanisms remain to be determined. To date, while thousands of lncRNAs have been identified in humans, the roles and mechanisms of these lncRNAs in control of gene transcription and disease progression remain largely unknown. lncRNAs are key regulators of chromatin structure, affecting the epigenetic state and expression level of target genes through interactions with histone modifiers, chromatin remodeling complexes, transcriptional regulators, or the DNA methylation machinery17–19. In the nucleus, lncRNAs can act as a scaffold, recruiting activators or suppressors at target gene promoters, and can epigenetically regulate gene transcription by inducing histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. In the cytoplasm, lncRNAs can act as a sponge for miRNAs, which modify gene expression at the post-transcriptional level49,50. Here, we find that the lncRNA HOTAIRM1 can regulate HOXA1 as well as miR124 expression, and thus controls MDSCs development. These new findings further support our previous studies, which linked MDSC expansion to the induction of the STAT3 pathway by miR12415.
Our results suggest that HOXA1 is a target for positive regulation by HOTAIRM1. HOXA1, a HOXA gene cluster member, has been shown to be upregulated in human malignancies and acts as an oncogene. In our study, the pattern of HOTAIRM1 expression is rather similar to that of the HOXA gene, lending support to the notion that the intergenic non-coding transcription of the HOX genomic regions is crucial to maintaining the active state of HOX clusters. Notably, HOX clusters have a specific pattern of lineage-restricted expression, where HOXA genes are predominantly expressed in myeloid cells51. The upregulation of some genes of the HOXA cluster has been observed in several subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)52,53. Mechanistically, HOTAIRM1 contributes to three-dimensional chromatin organization changes that are required for the temporal collinear activation of HOXA genes30. HOTAIRM1 also contributes to the physical dissociation of chromatin loops at the cluster proximal end, which delays recruitment of the histone demethylase UTX and transcription of central HOXA genes30. In addition, a previous study reported that HOTAIRM1 mediates demethylation of histone proteins and reduces DNA methylation levels via epigenetic modulation of HOXA1 gene expression29. This finding provides an example of transcriptional control via the chromatin state and may help explain the role of HOTAIRM1 within the HOXA gene cluster. Thus far, how HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 control each other's expression in a mutually exclusive manner is unclear. DNA sequence analysis of HOTAIRM1 shows a structure with the presence of a bi-directional promoter shared by the divergent coding and noncoding RNAs that may facilitate the cis action of HOTAIRM1 on their regulating genes19,20. Notably, HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 are not always coordinately expressed, indicating that HOTAIRM1 may also be transcribed independently21. These studies indicate a positive feedback loop in regulation of the HOXA1 and HOTAIRM1 to control the MDSCs differentiation and suppressive function.
Interactions between lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs have been described previously, which show a multilayered complexity of RNA crosstalk and competition54,55, and that lncRNAs seem to regulate both the expression of neighboring genes and distinct genomic sequences56. Interestingly, the HOX genomic regions have numerous ncRNAs, suggesting that these ncRNAs may participate in the regulation of HOX expression21. Specifically, HOTAIRM1 can regulate HOXA1 and HOXA4 expressions24. Also, HOTAIRM1 regulates myeloid maturation in human NB4 promyelocytic leukemia cells27. Our current study clearly shows that HOTAIRM1 and HOXA1 can regulate each other to control miR124 levels in MDSCs. This is in line with a recent report showing that the HOTAIR-miR214 axis plays an important role in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma57. The cooperation of two ncRNAs, HOTAIRM1 and miR124, in the MDSC development and disease progression merits further investigation.
While many studies are investigating lncRNAs as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for human diseases, to our knowledge, this is the first report showing that the HOTAIRM1-HOXA1-miR124 axis promotes MDSCs development and immunosuppressive functions during chronic HCV infection. Therefore, targeting this axis may provide a novel approach for immunotherapy in conjunction with antiviral therapy to combat human viral diseases.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by multiple Grants to Z.Q.Y, including National Institutes of Health Grants R01AI114748, R21AI138598, and S10OD021572; VA Merit Review Awards 1I01BX002670 and 1I01BX004281; and DoD Award PR170067. This publication is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the James H. Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The contents in this publication do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Author contributions
B.K.C.T. and J.Y.Z. performed most of the experiments, B.K.C.T. prepared figures 1-4 and J.Y.Z prepared figures 5-7. J.Z., L.N.N., L.N.T.N., S.K., D.C., X.D., and M.S. participated in some experiments. X.Y.W. and Z.D.M provided technical support. M.E., Z.K.L., Y.J., S.N., L.W., and J.P.M. offered intellectual input for troubleshooting and discussion of the findings. Z.Q.Y. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript, with the help of all other authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Bal Krishna Chand Thakuri and Jinyu Zhang.
References
- 1.Park SH, Rehermann B. Immune responses to HCV and other hepatitis viruses. Immunity. 2014;40:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosen HR. Emerging concepts in immunity to hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4121–4130. doi: 10.1172/JCI67714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Manns MP, von Hahn T. Novel therapies for hepatitis C—one pill fits all? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:595–610. doi: 10.1038/nrd4050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pawlotsky JM. Hepatitis C virus resistance to direct-acting antiviral drugs in interferon-free regimens. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:70–86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ly KN, Hughes EM, Jiles RB, Holmberg SD. Rising mortality associated with hepatitis C virus in the United States, 2003–2013. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:1287–1288. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer. J Immunol. 2009;182:4499–4506. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:162–174. doi: 10.1038/nri2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dai J, El Gazzar M, Li GY, Moorman JP, Yao ZQ. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Paradoxical roles in infection and immunity. J Innate Immun. 2015;7:116–126. doi: 10.1159/000368233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bowers NL, et al. Immune suppression by neutrophils in HIV-1 infection: Role of PD-L1/PD-1 pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003993. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Norris BA, et al. Chronic but not acute virus infection induces sustained expansion of myeloid suppressor cell numbers that inhibit viral-specific T cell immunity. Immunity. 2013;38:309–321. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tacke RS, et al. Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2012;55:343–353. doi: 10.1002/hep.24700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cai W, et al. Clinical significance and functional studies of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in chronic hepatitis C patients. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33:798–808. doi: 10.1007/s10875-012-9861-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang L, et al. Expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells promotes differentiation of regulatory T cells in HIV-1+ individuals. AIDS. 2016;30:1521–1531. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ren JP, et al. Hepatitis C virus-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells regulate T-cell differentiation and function via the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway. Immunology. 2016;148:377–386. doi: 10.1111/imm.12616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ren JP, et al. Decline of miR-124 in myeloid cells promotes regulatory T-cell development in hepatitis C virus infection. Immunology. 2017;150:213–220. doi: 10.1111/imm.12680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang L, et al. HCV-associated exosomes promote myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion via inhibiting miR-124 to regulate T follicular cell differentiation and function. Cell Discov. 2018;4:51. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0052-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jandura A, Krause HM. The new RNA world: Growing evidence for long noncoding RNA functionality. Trends Genet. 2017;33:665–676. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morceau F, Chateauvieux S, Gaigneaux A, Dicato M, Diederich M. Long and short non-coding RNAs as regulators of hematopoietic differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:14744–14770. doi: 10.3390/ijms140714744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang X, Hong R, Chen W, Xu M, Wang L. The role of long noncoding RNA in major human disease. Bioorg Chem. 2019;92:103214. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Birney E, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816. doi: 10.1038/nature05874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rinn JL, et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2007;129:1311–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sasaki YT, Sano M, Kin T, Asai K, Hirose T. Coordinated expression of ncRNAs and HOX mRNAs in the human HOXA locus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357:724–730. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sessa L, et al. Noncoding RNA synthesis and loss of Polycomb group repression accompanies the colinear activation of the human HOXA cluster. RNA. 2007;13:223–239. doi: 10.1261/rna.266707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang X, et al. A myelopoiesis-associated regulatory intergenic noncoding RNA transcript within the human HOXA cluster. Blood. 2009;113:2526–2534. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-162164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Langston AW, Gudas LJ. Identification of a retinoic acid responsive enhancer 3′ of the murine homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Mech. Dev. 1992;38:217–227. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(92)90055-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen ZH, et al. The lncRNA HOTAIRM1 regulates the degradation of PML-RARA oncoprotein and myeloid cell differentiation by enhancing the autophagy pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:212–224. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang X, Weissman SM, Newburger PE. Long intergenic non-coding RNA HOTAIRM1 regulates cell cycle progression during myeloid maturation in NB4 human promyelocytic leukemia cells. RNA Biol. 2014;11:777–787. doi: 10.4161/rna.28828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tian X, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOXA transcript antisense RNA myeloid-specific 1-HOXA1 Axis downregulates the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in lung cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:473. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li Q, Dong C, Cui J, Wang Y, Hong X. Over-expressed lncRNA HOTAIRM1 promotes tumor growth and invasion through up-regulating HOXA1 and sequestering G9a/EZH2/Dnmts away from the HOXA1 gene in glioblastoma multiforme. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:265. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0941-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang XQ, Dostie J. Reciprocal regulation of chromatin state and architecture by HOTAIRM1 contributes to temporal collinear HOXA gene activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:1091–1104. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Díaz-Beyá M, et al. The lincRNA HOTAIRM1, located in the HOXA genomic region, is expressed in acute myeloid leukemia, impacts prognosis in patients in the intermediate-risk cytogenetic category, and is associated with a distinctive microRNA signature. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31613–31627. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Achyut BR, Arbab AS. Taming immune suppressor: application of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in anti-cancer gene therapy. Transl Cancer Res. 2017;6:S160–S162. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.02.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bizymi N, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in hematologic diseases: promising biomarkers and treatment targets. Hemasphere. 2019;3:e168. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pawelec G, Verschoor CP, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Not only in tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1099. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Munder M, et al. Arginase I is constitutively expressed in human granulocytes and participates in fungicidal activity. Blood. 2005;105:2549–2556. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ohl K, Tenbrock K. Reactive oxygen species as regulators of MDSC-mediated immune suppression. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2499. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tian X, Tian J, Tang X, Ma J, Wang S. Long non-coding RNAs in the regulation of myeloid cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9:99. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0333-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jeong M, Goodell MA. Noncoding Regulatory RNAs in Hematopoiesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;118:245–270. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.El Gazzar M. microRNAs as potential regulators of myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion. Innate Immun. 2014;20:227–238. doi: 10.1177/1753425913489850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koukos G, et al. MicroRNA-124 regulates STAT3 expression and is down-regulated in colon tissues of pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:842–852.e842. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang J, et al. MiR-124 suppresses growth of human colorectal cancer by inhibiting STAT3. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Han YC, et al. microRNA-29a induces aberrant self-renewal capacity in hematopoietic progenitors, biased myeloid development, and acute myeloid leukemia. J Exp Med. 2010;207:475–489. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li GY, et al. Hepatitis C virus-induced reduction in miR-181a impairs CD4(+) T-cell responses through overexpression of DUSP6. Hepatology. 2015;61:1163–1173. doi: 10.1002/hep.27634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cheng YQ, et al. MicroRNA-155 regulates interferon-γ production in natural killer cells via Tim-3 signalling in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Immunology. 2015;145:485–497. doi: 10.1111/imm.12463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Keller S, Sanderson MP, Stoeck A, Altevogt P. Exosomes: from biogenesis and secretion to biological function. Immunol Lett. 2006;107:102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pegtel DM, et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:6328–6333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914843107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Valadi H, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Masciopinto F, et al. Association of hepatitis C virus envelope proteins with exosomes. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:2834–2842. doi: 10.1002/eji.200424887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bukong TN, Momen-Heravi F, Kodys K, Bala S, Szabo G. Exosomes from hepatitis C infected patients transmit HCV infection and contain replication competent viral RNA in complex with Ago2-miR122-HSP90. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004424. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cosset FL, Dreux M. HCV transmission by hepatic exosomes establishes a productive infection. J Hepatol. 2014;60:674–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dreux M, et al. Short-range exosomal transfer of viral RNA from infected cells to plasmacytoid dendritic cells triggers innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:558–570. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De Braekeleer E, et al. Hox gene dysregulation in acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncol. 2014;10:475–495. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hollink IH, et al. NUP98/NSD1 characterizes a novel poor prognostic group in acute myeloid leukemia with a distinct HOX gene expression pattern. Blood. 2011;118:3645–3656. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-346643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Becker H, et al. Favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in older patients with cytogenetically normal de novo acute myeloid leukemia and associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:596–604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ulitsky I, Bartel DP. lincRNAs: Genomics, evolution, and mechanisms. Cell. 2013;154:26–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu C, Shang Z, Ma Y, Ma J, Song J. HOTAIR/miR-214-3p/FLOT1 axis plays an essential role in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12:50–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]