Abstract
Streptococcus pyogenes or group A Streptococcus (GAS) causes diseases ranging from uncomplicated pharyngitis to life-threatening infections. It has complex epidemiology driven by the diversity, the temporal and geographical fluctuations of the circulating strains. Despite the global burden of GAS diseases, there is currently no available vaccination strategy against GAS infections. This study, based on a longitudinal population survey, aimed to understand the dynamic of GAS emm types and to give leads to better recognition of underlying mechanisms for the emergence of successful clones. From 2009 to 2017, we conducted a systematic culture-based diagnosis of GAS infections in a French Brittany population with a prospective recovery of clinical data. The epidemiological analysis was performed using emm typing combined with the structural and functional cluster-typing system for all the recovered strains. Risk factors for the invasiveness, identified by univariate analysis, were computed in a multiple logistic regression analysis, and the only independent risk factor remaining in the model was the age (OR for the entire range [CI95%] = 6.35 [3.63, 11.10]; p<0.0001). Among the 61 different emm types identified, the most prevalent were emm28 (16%), emm89 (15%), emm1 (14%), and emm4 (8%), which accounted for more than 50% of circulating strains. During the study period, five genotypes identified as emm44, 66, 75, 83, 87 emerged successively and belonged to clusters D4, E2, E3, and E6 that were different from those gathering “Prevalent” emm types (clusters A-C3 to 5, E1 and E4). We previously reported significant genetic modifications for emm44, 66, 83 and 75 types resulting possibly from a short adaptive evolution. Herein we additionally observed that the emergence of a new genotype could occur in a susceptible population having specific risk factors or probably lacking a naturally-acquired cluster-specific immune cross-protection. Among emergent emm types, emm75 and emm87 tend to become prevalent with a stable annual incidence and the risk of a clonal expansion have to be considered.
Introduction
Streptococcus pyogenes or Group A Streptococcus (GAS) are Gram-positive cocci that usually colonize the human skin and throat and cause a wide variety of diseases ranging in severity from uncomplicated pharyngitis to severe and life-threatening infections [1]. On a global scale, GAS ranked as the fourth deadliest bacterium in the world, with more than 500,000 deaths per year [2].
Lancefield’s pioneering work demonstrated that GAS infections elicit a robust immune response by producing opsonizing antibodies against the cell surface M protein encoded by the emm gene [3]. For GAS, M protein is a major immunological and virulence determinant able to bind several host factors (fibrinogen, plasminogen, immunoglobulins) [1]. For an epidemiological survey of GAS infections, emm genotyping based on the sequence of the 5’ hypervariable end of the emm gene, is a worldwide-accepted marker [4]. More than 250 different genotypes have been identified and referenced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta. The M-protein-based vaccine appears to be the most promising strategy. Although many trials are in progress (CANVAS Group: Coalition to Accelerate New Vaccines Against Streptococcus) [5], there is currently no available vaccination against GAS infections. Its unavailability is mainly explained by the epidemiological complexity of circulating strains stressed by their geographical diversity and temporal variability [6–10].
The epidemiological studies performed on the different continents revealed remarkable differences between the industrialized and the low-income countries [7, 8, 11–13]. In a thorough review of studies focussing on the distribution of emm types between global regions, Steer et al. reported that in high- and middle-income countries (Americas, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East), there is essentially a high prevalence of few genotypes (emm1, 12, 28, 3, 4, and 89). In contrast, in Africa and the Pacific Islands, the distribution of emm types is more diverse and does not show dominant emm types [9].
In addition to emm genotyping, and based on their tissue tropism, GAS emm types can also be grouped into patterns where the patterns A to C strains have a preferential pharyngeal tropism, the pattern D has a cutaneous tropism, and the pattern E which is said to be "generalist" having no specific pharyngeal or cutaneous tropism [14]. In tropical countries, the most frequently isolated emm types of GAS belong to emm-pattern D (skin tropism) or E (no specific tropism), as opposed to temperate regions where there are more strains of emm-pattern A–C (pharyngeal tropism) [15]. The reasons for this contrasting molecular epidemiology are not understood. However, to support the notion that skin emm types dominate the epidemiology in many tropical countries, it has been suggested that strains belonging to the pattern E elicit a weaker immune response than throat specialist strains (pattern A-C) [16]. Despite these significant differences in the distribution of emm genotypes, regional and temporal differences within industrialized countries remain poorly explained.
Consistent with emm typing and emm patterns, similar sequences of N terminal part of M proteins, predictable to share functional properties and elicit cross-protective antibodies, has recently been assigned to a specific emm-cluster [17]. Therefore, cluster-typing system proposes a new working hypothesis to analyse epidemiological data with a functional and immunological view. From a public health perspective, it could offer the opportunity to understand better the population’s immune susceptibility and explain the emergence of new clones, or yet to anticipate a possible vaccination strategy.
Over nine years of the prospective survey, we first aimed to describe clinical and molecular epidemiology of GAS infections in a population of French Brittany. Secondly, hypothesizing that population immunity has to be considered as a risk for clonal emergence or emm type switching, we analysed the dynamic of “Prevalent” and “Emergent” emm types by combining emm genotyping and emm-cluster system.
Materials and methods
Study design and case definition
We conducted a prospective study based on the culture-diagnosis of GAS infections from January 1st 2009 to December 31st 2017, at the University Hospital Centre (UHC) of Rennes–France. A case was defined as a patient in whom one or several GAS isolates were collected. For each case, clinical data were collected prospectively by a detailed questionnaire and comprised demographic data (age, sex, residence area…), anatomical site of isolates, clinical presentation (asymptomatic, local signs, fever and/or general signs, hemodynamic shock), clinical diagnosis (as reported in the final medical report for each case), the portal of entry (cutaneous, pharyngeal, anogenital or unknown), risk factors and underlying disease (concomitant surgery, pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung and heart failure, intravenous drug abuse, homeless, daily alcohol intake, cirrhosis, steroids medication, solid or haematological malignancy…), and primary treatment management strategy (medical, surgical, requiring or not intensive care). Combined data were validated weekly to identify any inconsistencies and to recover missing data when possible. Cases were classified into three categories:
Carriage: when clinical symptoms were unrelated to GAS infection.
Non-invasive disease: when GAS was isolated from non-sterile sites in association with superficial mucosal or cutaneous infections.
Invasive disease, which is subcategorized in a) Probable invasive disease: when GAS was isolated from non-sterile sites but caused an acute illness that required surgery or hospital care, and b) Definite invasive disease, when at least one GAS isolate was obtained from a sterile site (e.g., blood, pleural, peritoneal…), or when associated with tissue necrosis or hemodynamic shock, either requiring fluid resuscitation or vasopressor drugs.
The results of the study were reported following the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies [18].
Gas isolates collection
All GAS isolates were collected in the hospital from clinical samples. Most of the isolates have been collected in the University Hospital Centre (UHC) of Rennes (87% of total), where they have been saved exhaustively for nine years, and regardless of infection site or invasiveness. When several isolates were recovered from the same infection case, only the first isolate was then considered to avoid redundancies. The collection was further enriched with GAS isolates sent from other hospital microbiological laboratories of French Brittany: Lorient, Pontivy, and Vannes (11,5% of total recovered isolates), Saint-Brieuc, and Dinan (1,5%). All GAS isolates were identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation–Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany). Each isolate was then stored at -80°C, and sub-cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 on Columbia blood agar plates containing 5% sheep blood (Biorad™, France) before performing any experimental procedure.
Molecular emm typing and emm-cluster typing system
Emm typing was performed by sequencing the 5’ portion of the emm gene according to the CDC guidelines, and emm type was determined by submitting the sequence to CDC emm type database (https://www.cdc.gov/streplab/groupa-strep/index.html; last accessed on 23th November 2020). The designation of each emm-cluster was then deduced as recently described [17].
Epidemiological definition
Depending on the strain occurrence observed during the survey period, each emm type was classified according to three different dynamic profiles assigned as “Prevalent”, “Emergent”, and “Sporadic” and defined as follows:
“Prevalent” emm types: the strains corresponding to genotypes that were isolated continuously, and apart from some fluctuations, their annual rates appeared relatively constant during the study period;
“Emergent” emm types: the strains corresponding to genotypes that exhibited a sudden change in their incidence, whether this occurred during a specific lag-time or continued over time;
“Sporadic” emm types: did not correspond to the precedent definitions, and each emm type was rarely observed with a prevalence <1% of total isolates.
Data analysis and statistics
The incidence of invasive infections was estimated using the population statistics of French Brittany regions collected from the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE, https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2386251; last accessed on 23th November 2020).
Continuous data were expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs), and categorical data as absolute numbers and frequencies. Categorical data were compared by the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The diversity of isolates was expressed by the Simpson’s diversity index (SDI) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) calculated using online tools (http://www.comparingpartitions.info/; last accessed on 23th November 2020). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the associations of individual risk factors variables (age, sex, comorbidities, or lifestyle risk factors…) with invasiveness (“Invasive” versus “Non-invasive”) and emm dynamic profiles (“Prevalent” versus “Sporadic” and “Prevalent” versus “Emergent”). Variables with a significance level of p ≤ 0.20 in univariate analyses were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. The values of Odds ratios (OR) and CI95% were adjusted to sex and age. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP.V13 and SAS®V9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, USA).
Ethical statement
Ethical approval, or patients’ consent, was not required since the study included only microbiological samples and did not involve human subjects or material. Once validated, the database was completely anonymized.
Results
GAS infections and clinical characteristics of the studied population
Between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2017, GAS isolates were recovered from specimens collected from the skin (38%), oropharyngeal (20%), anogenital (16%), blood (12%), synovial fluid and bone (6%), pleuro-pulmonary (4%) or other (4%) locations. Several isolates could be collected for a single case, but only the first isolate was attached to each of the 942 recorded cases. The diagnosis of GAS infections was mainly performed within the UHC of Rennes, and explain that, over the 21 regions of French Brittany, the majority of GAS isolates was recovered from patients residing in Rennes and the neighbouring areas (S1 Fig). In the UHC of Rennes, the collection was exhaustive since all the isolated GAS were saved. During the surveillance period, and as previously described, we also observed seasonal variation of the rate of infections (invasive and non-invasive), peaking in autumn/winter (S2 Fig) [19].
Among the 942 identified cases, 49 (5%) were classified as carriage, 889 (94%) as clinical GAS-infection, and only 4 (<1%) were unclassified because of missing clinical data. GAS infections were categorized as non-invasive (350/942, 37%), and invasive infections (539/942; 57%) that were also subcategorized in probable invasive (171/942; 18%), and definite invasive infections (368/942; 39%) (see “Materials and methods” for definitions). Demographic characteristics, clinical features, including main general symptoms, the portal of entry, and positive blood culture rates were reported in Table 1. The median age of the overall population was 31.7 years (ranging from 0 to 102). Age-specific distribution of cases showed three peaks in the [0–5), [30–40), and >70 age-groups (S3 Fig). Focusing on the overall 889 infection cases, the sex ratio (M/F) was 1.16 (54% males); however, the rate of females was over-represented in the [30–40) age-group (64% of females) while the percentage of males was higher in the [40–50) age-group (68% of males) (S3 Fig). While the microbiology laboratory of the UHC of Rennes is the primary laboratory of the area, the exhaustive collection of GAS infections allowed the incidence of invasive infections (probable and definite) to be estimated more accurately for people living in Rennes. Thus, the estimated average of the annual incidence was 5.4 ± 1.3 / 100,000 inhabitant/year with a median of 5.3 and interval of [3.5; 7.3].
Table 1. Population demography, infection characteristics, and risk factors for invasiveness.
| Overall | Carriage | Non-Invasive | Invasive | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 942)* | (n = 49) | (n = 350) | Probable | Definite | Invasive vs | |
| (n = 171) | (n = 368) | Non-invasive | ||||
| Age | ||||||
| Mean ± SD | 34.3 ± 26.7 | 34.1 ± 28.3 | 27.0 ± 24.1 | 28.4 ± 22.6 | 43.9 ± 27.7 | <0.0001 |
| Median | 31.7 | 28.5 | 23.8 | 25.3 | 40.4 | |
| [Range] | [0–102] | [0.1–91] | [0–102] | [0.6–92] | [0–97] | |
| Sex | ||||||
| (% Males) | (52.7) | (33.3) | (50.9) | (59.7) | (53.5) | 0.1911 |
| Portal of entry; n (% total) | <0.0001 | |||||
| Cutaneous | 499 (53) | 5 (10) | 190 (54) | 110 (65) | 191 (52) | |
| ENT-Respiratory | 247 (26) | 24 (49) | 64 (18) | 47 (27) | 112 (31) | |
| Anogenital | 164 (17) | 20 (41) | 96 (27) | 14 (8) | 34 (9) | |
| Not Known | 31 (4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 31 (8) | |
| Missing data | 1 | - | - | - | - | |
| General symptoms related to GAS infection; n (% total) | <0.0001 | |||||
| None | 49 (5) | 49 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Local signs without fever | 213 (23) | 0 (0) | 176 (50) | 22 (13) | 15 (4) | |
| Fever and/or sepsis | 538 (57) | 0 (0) | 148 (42) | 137 (80) | 253 (69) | |
| Hemodynamic shock | 88 (9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 88 (24) | |
| Missing data | 54 (6) | 0 (0) | 26 (7) | 12 (7) | 12 (3) | |
| Blood culture; n (% total column) | ||||||
| Performed | 462/942 (49) | 13/49(27) | 87/350 (25) | 69/172 (40) | 293/367 (80) | <0.0001 |
| Positive | 173/462 (38) | 0/13 (0) | 0/87(0) | 0/69 (0) | 173/293 (59) | - |
| Risk Factors and associated comorbidities; n (% of total) | ||||||
| No risk factor | 613 (65) | 27 (55) | 252 (72) | 121 (71) | 215 (58) | 0.0025 |
| At least 1 risk factor | 325 (35) | 22 (45) | 98 (28) | 50 (29) | 153 (42) | 0.0025 |
| Skin Lesion | 477 (51) | 8 (16) | 206 (59) | 95 (56) | 166 (45) | 0.0026 |
| Cardiac Failure | 34 (4) | 1 (2) | 3 (1) | 4 (2) | 26 (7) | <0.0001 |
| Surgery <7 days | 45 (5) | 2 (4) | 9 (3) | 9 (5) | 25 (8) | 0.0105 |
| Diabetes | 67 (7) | 2 (4) | 17 (5) | 9 (5) | 39 (11) | 0.0197 |
| Solid cancer | 47 (5) | 5 (10) | 10 (3) | 4 (2) | 28 (8) | 0.0282 |
| COPD | 14 (1) | 4 (8) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (1) | 8 (2) | 0.0353 |
| Homeless | 44 (5) | 2 (4) | 21 (6) | 16 (9) | 4 (1) | 0.1183 |
| Steroids | 53 (6) | 7 (14) | 14 (4) | 5(3) | 27 (7) | 0.1923 |
| IVDU | 34 (4) | 0 (0) | 11 (3) | 15 (9) | 8 (2) | 0.3829 |
| Alcohol Abuser | 59 (6) | 1 (2) | 22 (6) | 16 (9) | 20 (5) | 0.8076 |
| Blood cancer | 10 (1) | 0 (0) | 4 (1) | 0 (0) | 6 (2) | 0.9708 |
| Other Comorbidities | 132 (14) | 13 (27) | 45 (13) | 20 (12) | 53 (14) | 0.4180 |
The main demographic and clinical data of the studied population were reported according to the given case definitions for “Carriage”, “Non-invasive”, and “Invasive” (probable and definite invasive) infections. Categorical comparisons between “Invasive” and “Non-invasive” infections were performed with Fisher’s exact tests, and p-values were indicated in the right column. Abbreviations: COPD = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ENT-Respiratory = Ear-Nose-Throat and respiratory; IVDU = Intravenous drug users.
* Of the 942 recorded cases, 4 had not a clinical diagnosis and several missing clinical data and were not subsequently categorized according to case definition.
As indicated in the final medical report, clinical diagnoses were available for almost all the recorded cases except four and were reported in Fig 1. Proportionally, skin and soft tissue infections were the most frequent (45%), followed by ENT-respiratory (23%), anogenital (15%), and bone and joint infections (10%). Isolated bacteraemia represented 2% of the whole population or 6% of all infections defined as invasive. Notably, in our studied population based on hospital diagnosis, ENT-Respiratory infections were more frequently invasive [non-invasive = 65/350 (19%) vs invasive = 154 / 539 (29%)] and were mainly related to the high proportion of pharyngeal infections that required hospital care or surgical treatment.
Fig 1. Clinical diagnosis of GAS infections.
Infection diagnoses were organised according to their main location. For each diagnosis, invasiveness categories (“Carriage”, “Non-invasive”, “Probable invasive”, and “Definite invasive”) were indicated by colours (see the legend at the bottom right). *Cases reported as erysipelas were considered as definite invasive infections when blood cultures were positive. The clinical presentations identified as “Other cutaneous” included chronic eschars (n = 3) and cutaneous fistula (n = 1); “Other ENT” included periorbital cellulitis (n = 4), ethmoiditis (n = 2), ocular non-invasive infections (n = 2), pharyngitis with diffuse sinusitis (n = 1), abscess of the nasal septum (n = 1) and peri-tracheal deep infection (n = 1); The group “Other” included peritonitis (n = 4), meningitis/cerebral abscess (n = 3), urinary infection (n = 3), mediastinitis (n = 2), cervical adenitis (n = 1), pacemaker infection (n = 1), pericarditis (n = 1), chorioamnionitis (n = 1) and post-infectious glomerulonephritis (n = 1). For the four patients with unavailable clinical diagnosis, the isolates were collected from a cutaneous specimen. Abbreviations: Cut. abscess = cutaneous abscess; ENT = Ear Nose and Throat; Superf. Cut. Inf = superficial cutaneous infection.
The portal of entry was identified for all infection cases except for 31 patients in whom it remained unknown (Table 1) and for whom the final diagnosis was septic arthritis (n = 14), isolated bacteraemia (n = 12), central nervous system infections (n = 2), primary peritonitis (n = 2), and pericarditis (n = 1). Overall the studied population, blood cultures were performed for 462 cases (49%). By focusing on the invasive infections, blood cultures had been performed for 69/172 (40%) of the probable invasive and 293/367 (80%) of definite invasive infections, suggesting that the rate of bacteraemia could be underestimated (Table 1).
Risk factors and comorbidities that could be associated with invasiveness were collected prospectively and reported in Table 1. Remarkably, among all the 889 infection cases, no risk factor or associated comorbidities has been identified for 588 patients (66% of infection cases). By performing univariate analysis of risk factors associated with invasiveness in our studied population, we identified statistically significant associations for age, skin lesion, cardiac failure, surgery <7 days of infection, diabetes, solid cancer and COPD (Table 1). When computed in multivariate logistic regression and adjusted to sex and age, the only independent risk factor remaining in the model and associated with the invasiveness was the age (OR the entire range [CI95%] = 6.35 [3.63, 11.10]; and by unit (year) [CI95%] = 1.018 [1.01, 1.02]; p<0.0001).
Emm-typing
Molecular emm-typing was performed for all the isolates recovered from the 942 recovered cases. We assigned 61 different emm types with a Simpson’s diversity index (SDI [CI95%]) value = 0.851 [0.779–0.922] (Fig 2 and S1 Table). Emm types diversity of GAS isolates collected from cases living “In-Rennes” (SDI [CI95%] = 0.831 [0.777–0.892]), where the collection was almost exhaustive, compared with those collected from other areas grouped in the category “Out-Rennes” (SDI [CI95%] = 0.803 [0.732–0.874]) were not significantly different since their confidence intervals overlapped (S1 Table). Then, all the GAS isolates were grouped and considered as representative for a French Brittany population.
Fig 2. GAS emm types distribution and dynamic profiles.
The distribution of each emm type was shown in the main histogram. Cumulative percentages of all the GAS isolated were reported at the top of the figure. Cumulative counts from 2009 to 2017 for “Prevalent” and “Emergent” emm types were presented independently. “Prevalent” emm types included 9 genotypes (emm1, 12, 3, 6, 4 28, 89, 77 and 2), and “Emergent” emm types includes 5 different genotypes that emerged successively in the following order: emm44 (already present in 2009 and sudden decrease of its occurrence in 2010, quarter (Q)4); emm83 (2011; Q2), emm75 (2013; Q1), emm66 (2013; Q2), and emm87 (2013; Q3).
The distribution of emm types showed that only four genotypes accounted for more than 50% of all isolated strains namely: emm28 (16%), emm89 (15%), emm1 (14%), and emm4 (8%) (Fig 2 and S1 Table). Emm types isolated with the highest rate from invasive infections were emm3 (89%), emm1 (74%), and emm87 (74%).
Depending on their occurrence during the survey, each of the 61 identified emm types was assigned to one of the three dynamic profiles: “Prevalent”, “Sporadic”, or “Emergent” (see Materials and methods section for definition). Emm types categorized as “Prevalent” encompasses the majority of isolates (n = 686; 72,8%) and corresponded to 9 different emm types (emm 28, 89, 1, 4, 12, 3, 6, 77, and 2). They were isolated from the beginning of the survey with almost a constant occurrence despite little variations around an individual slope (Fig 2). In contrast, the majority of emm types (47/61 emm types) were categorized as “Sporadic”, but the isolates represented only 12.4% of all the GAS isolated during the survey, and each of the “Sporadic” emm types was rarely isolated (< 1% of all the isolates) (S1 Table). “Emergent” emm types were marked by a sudden shift in their occurrence during the survey period and corresponded to 5 different genotypes: emm44 (n = 32; 3.4% of all the isolates), emm66 (n = 14; 1.3%), emm75 (n = 48; 4.9%), emm83 (n = 20; 2.1%), and emm87 (n = 26, 2.7%) (Fig 2).
Depending on the emm type identified, each case was assigned to one of the three groups of emm type dynamic profiles (“Prevalent”, “Sporadic”, and “Emergent”) that were subsequently analyzed according to the demographic and clinical data, aiming to find specific risk factors that could be associated. As shown in Table 2, the age, the sex, general symptoms related to the infection, the invasiveness of the infection, and the rate of positive blood culture were similar for each of the emm type dynamic profiles. The rate of the cutaneous portal of entry was higher for patients infected with “Sporadic” and “Emergent” emm types, while ENT-respiratory and anogenital portal of entries were higher when infection occurred with “Prevalent” emm types. By performing univariate analysis, risk factors identified to be significantly associated with the group of patients infected with “Emergent” emm types were those related to people living in poor hygienic conditions (homeless, alcohol abuse, of IV drug user) (Table 2). By computing the data in a logistic regression model and considering the “Prevalent” emm types as a reference category, homeless and alcohol abuse remained both in the model as independent risk factors for the category of patients infected with “Emergent” emm types (Table 3). Furthermore, by analyzing risk factors independently for each of the five “Emergent” emm types we found that infections with emm44 (invasive infections = 16/32; 50%), emm66 (7/13; 54%), and emm83 (10/20; 50%) were significantly linked to patients living in poor hygienic conditions (p<0.001) and associating with one or several risk factors such as homeless, alcoholism or IV drug user. In contrast, we did not find any explanatory clinical risk factors for patients infected with the emergent emm75 (invasive infection = 27/48; 56%) and emm87 (17/26; 65%) genotypes.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics, and risk factors for GAS infections with “Emergent” emm type: Univariate analyses.
| Prevalent | Sporadic | Emergent | Univariate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | (n = 686) | (n = 116) | (n = 140) | p-value |
| Age | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 34.1 ± 27.9 | 36.5 ± 21.9 | 33.3 ± 24.5 | 0.3313 |
| Median | 31.2 | 32.6 | 33.6 | |
| [Range] | [0–97] | [0.4–91] | [0.1–102] | |
| Sex | ||||
| (% Males) | (50.6) | (60.3) | (56.4) | 0.1024 |
| Portal of entry; n (% total column) | <0.0001 | |||
| Cutaneous | 323 (47) | 80 (69) | 96 (68) | |
| ENT-Respiratory | 203 (29) | 19 (16) | 25 (18) | |
| Anogenital | 135 (20) | 14 (12) | 15 (11) | |
| Not Known | 24 (4) | 3 (3) | 4 (3) | |
| Missing data | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| General symptoms related to GAS infection; n (% total column) | 0.0244 | |||
| None (Carriage) | 43/648 (6) | 1/113 (1) | 5/127 (4) | |
| Local signs without fever | 150/648 (22) | 35/113 (30) | 28/127 (20) | |
| Fever and/or sepsis | 385/648 (56) | 70/113 (62) | 83/127 (59) | |
| Hemodynamic shock | 70/648 (10) | 7/113 (6) | 11/127 (8) | |
| Missing data | 38/686 (6) | 3/116 (3) | 13/140 (9) | |
| Blood culture; n (% total column) | ||||
| Performed | 339/686 (49) | 51/116(44) | 71/140 (51) | 0.7489 |
| Positive | 133/339 (39) | 15/51 (29) | 25/71 (35) | 0.6432 |
| Invasiveness; n (% total column) | 0.0395 | |||
| Carriage | 43 (6) | 1 (1) | 5 (3) | |
| Non-Invasive | 242 (35) | 51 (44) | 57 (41) | |
| Probable invasive | 121 (18) | 24 (21) | 26 (19) | |
| Definite invasive | 278 (41) | 39 (34) | 51 (37) | |
| Risk Factors and associated comorbidities; n (% total cases) | ||||
| No-Risk Factor | 461 (67) | 126 (70) | 75 (53) | 0.0057 |
| At least 1 risk factor | 225 (33) | 35 (30) | 65 (47) | 0.0057 |
| Skin Lesion | 321 (47) | 70 (60) | 86(61) | 0.0005 |
| Homeless | 10 (1) | 8 (7) | 26 (19) | <0.0001 |
| Alcohol Abuse | 23 (3) | 6 (5) | 30 (22) | <0.0001 |
| IVDU | 10 (1) | 6 (5) | 18 (13) | <0.0001 |
| Surgery <7 days | 33 (5) | 2 (2) | 5 (6) | 0.1733 |
| Diabetes | 54 (8) | 7 (6) | 6 (4) | 0.2467 |
| Solid cancer | 37 (5) | 3 (3) | 7 (6) | 0.3803 |
| Cardiac Failure | 27 (4) | 2 (2) | 5 (4) | 0.4347 |
| COPD | 12 (2) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0.5029 |
| Steroids | 41 (6) | 5 (4) | 7 (6) | 0.7143 |
| Blood cancer | 8 (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0.8616 |
| Other Comorbidities | 103 (15) | 15 (13) | 14 (10) | 0.2563 |
Main clinical data of the studied population were reported according to the given definitions of emm dynamic profiles. Univariate categorical comparisons were performed with Fisher’s exact tests and the p-values were indicated in the right column. Abbreviations: COPD = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ENT-Respiratory = Ear-Nose-Throat and respiratory; IVDU = Intravenous drug users.* Of the 942 recorded cases, 4 had not a clinical diagnosis and several missing clinical data and were not subsequently categorised according to the case definition.
Table 3. Risk factors for GAS infections with “Emergent” emm type: Multinomial logistic regression analyses.
| Prevalent | Sporadic | p-value | Emergent | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | OR [CI95%] | (Wald) | OR [CI95%] | (Wald) | |
| Age (Year) | 1 | 1.00 [0.99–1.01] | 0.4462 | 1.00 [0.99–1.01] | 0.9776 |
| Sex (for males) | 1 | 1.32 [0.87–1.99] | 0.1929 | 0.97 [0.66–1.43] | 0.8925 |
| Cutaneous Lesion | 1 | 1.63 [1.08–2.46] | 0.0212 | 1.60 [1.09–2.34] | 0.0170 |
| IV Drug User | 1 | 1.67 [0.45–6.19] | 0.4443 | 1.49 [0.54–4.11] | 0.4429 |
| Alcohol Abuse | 1 | 0.28 [0.07–1.12] | 0.0727 | 2.96 [1.47–5.97] | 0.0024 |
| Homeless | 1 | 7.24 [1.78–29.5] | 0.0058 | 5.58 [2.31–13.5] | 0.0001 |
“Prevalent” emm type served as a reference category for logistic regression. Odds ratios (OR) and CI95% for risk factors associated with “Sporadic" and “Emergent” emm types were estimated by performing two independent logistic regressions adjusted by age and sex.
Dynamic of emm types and emm-clusters analysis
Protein M is the most immunogenic protein and can confer emm-specific immunity against GAS infections. Emm types and their distribution were organised according to the recently described cluster classification proposed by Sanderson-Smith [21], that, in addition to the structure and function of the M protein, also consider its capacity to induce an immune cross-protection against the other M proteins belonging to the same cluster. Hypothesizing that most frequent or prevalent emm types that circulate in a population may confer a collective immune cross-protection against the other emm types from the same cluster, we analysed the relationship of "Emergent" emm types to their cluster classification. As represented in Fig 3, the 942 emm-typed GAS isolates were assigned to 16 of the 48 described emm-clusters and ordered according to their dynamic profile shown by their densities during the survey period (Fig 3A).
Fig 3. Dynamic profiles of GAS emm types and emm cluster-typing classification from 2009 to 2017.
A) The densities of each of the 61 emm types were represented and were classified according to their dynamic profile observed during the study period. B) For each emm type, the number of isolates from 2009 to 2017 was reported by quarter. They were organised according to their dynamic profile (column) and their corresponding cluster (row, indicated at the right side). Emm types were indicated in the corresponding box. Emm types 6, 5, 29 and 105 were grouped within a single row named “Single protein (clade Y)”, and corresponded to four individual clusters, M6, M5, M29 and M105 respectively. “Prevalent” emm types (emm1, 12, 3, 6, 4 28, 89, 77 and 2) belonged to the clusters A-C3 to 5, M6, E1, and E4. “Emergent” emm types (emm44, 66, 82, 75, and 87) belonged to clusters D4, E2 and E3 that were different from those of the “Prevalent” emm types.
“Prevalent” emm types (n = 686 GAS isolates; 73%) were classified in emm-clusters A-C3 (emm1), A-C4 (emm12), A-C5 (emm3), M6 (emm6), E1 (emm4), and E4 (emm28, emm89, emm77 and emm2).
Almost all the “Sporadic” emm types (n = 116 GAS isolates; 12%) belonged to clusters different from those of the “Prevalent” emm types except within the cluster E4 (Fig 3B). Remarkably, the emm-cluster E4 was the most prevalent and diverse of the other emm-clusters and encompassed 11 emm types, among which 4 with “Prevalent” (emm28, 89, 77, 2) and 7 with “Sporadic” dynamic profiles (emm73, 88, 102, 22, 169, 8, 112) (Fig 3B). Notably, the unique emm60 identified and categorized as a “Sporadic” emm type in the E1 cluster corresponded to a patient with a superficial skin infection that occurred during recent touristic travel in Africa (Senegal).
In our study population, “Emergent” emm types (n = 140 GAS isolates; 15%) belonged exclusively to clusters D or E, and within which “Sporadic” emm types could also be classified. We thus observed sequentially the emergence of the genotypes emm44 (before 2009; cluster E3), emm83 (2011; cluster D4), emm75 (2013; cluster E6), emm66 (2013; cluster E2), and emm87 (2013; cluster E3). Consistently, after nine years of comprehensive and prospective surveillance in French Brittany, we did not observe any clonal emergence of a new emm type within the clusters A-C3, A-C4, A-C5, E1 and E4 that gather “Prevalent” genotypes. Therefore, our observation suggested a complementary hypothesis that “Prevalent” emm types would provide a certain degree of immune cross-protection for the population, reducing the probability of allowing the emergence of a new emm type within the same cluster. Of note, despite a high diversity of emm genotypes found within the cluster E4 (4 “Prevalent” and 7 “Sporadic” emm-genotypes), we did not observe the emergence of a new genotype during the study period in this cluster. Finally, emm types clustered as a single protein, and for which it has been proposed that their M protein could have different immunological, structural, and functional characteristics were grouped in the same row and encompassed “Prevalent” (emm6) and “Sporadic” (emm5, emm29, and emm105) emm types (Fig 3).
Discussion
We presented a comprehensive dynamic of GAS emm types over 9-years of prospective culture-based diagnosis in French Brittany. Among the 942 isolates that were clinically documented, 61 different emm types were identified. The most “Prevalent” emm types were emm28, 89, 1, 4, 12, 3, 6, and 77, in agreement with those reported from other studies performed in developed countries [6, 7]. Deciphering the temporal dynamics of the emm genotypes in our studied population, we observed that the five "Emergent" emm types never belonged to clusters within which "Prevalent" genotypes have been identified.
Clinical characteristics of the studied population
We initially analysed our population’s clinical characteristics, aiming to compare our data with those of other surveys carried out in industrialized countries. Age distribution of GAS infections is generally described with a higher rate in the elderly, followed by infants under 10 years old. This bimodal distribution suggests possible protection by a natural-immunity acquired through multiple episodes of colonization or infection in early life, and that declines in the elderly [20, 21]. As reported by Lamagni et al [22], we have also observed increased infection rate between 20 and 40 years. Regarding the UK population, it has been proposed that this reshaping of age distribution results from a high rate of intravenous drug users [22]. In the same way of evidence, we noticed for this age group category an excess of patients having one or several risk factors such as homeless, alcoholism, or intravenous drug use. Besides, we have also observed a high genital tract sepsis rate in women of childbearing age (between 30 and 40 years old). The primary diagnoses were endometritis and postpartum puerperal sepsis that accounted for about 20% of all the invasive infections for this age category. It has been suggested that altered immune status during pregnancy and specific characteristics of the infecting GAS strain contribute to the risk for GAS infection and mortality in postpartum women [23].
For the overall population, risk factors for invasiveness identified by univariate analysis (age, diabetes, cardiac failure, and malignancy) are consistent with other studies performed in industrialized countries [6, 7, 19, 24]. However, the rate of risk factors identified above increased with ageing, and when analysed with a multivariate logistic regression model, the age remained the unique independent risk factor in our studied population. Gender as a risk factor varies between studies, and this is possibly dependent on the age group distribution of each studied population [7, 13, 22, 25–28].
Skin and soft tissue infections were the most frequent clinical presentations, and the severity of the infections required hospitalization for the majority of them. Among cases diagnosed as erysipelas, although frequently described as restricted to the superficial skin and considered as a non-invasive infection, 48% of them have a positive blood culture and subsequently categorised as invasive infections. This may indicate that clinical differentiation of erysipelas is not precise enough, and streptococcal cellulitis could be underdiagnosed.
Perianal streptococcal dermatitis or anitis is the most common non-invasive disease seen in children of 3–5 years old [29]. The four most frequent types found for this infection were emm28 (56%), emm77 (9%), emm4 (13%), and emm12 (6%). Of note emm28 an emm77 express the protein R28, which has an LPxTG motif ([30, 31] and personal data) and believed to promote adhesion to human cervical cells.
Dynamic of emm types
For several decades, it has been known that the most potent protective immunity against GAS infection is M specific [3], which produces opsonizing antibodies directed against the N terminus of the M protein. Molecular types sharing structural and functional homologies were inferred to a unique emm-cluster and could elicit cross-protective immunity of almost all emm types within a specific emm-cluster [32]. As in all the surveys performed in industrialized countries, the throat specialist genotypes emm1 (belonging to cluster A-C3), emm12 (A-C4), and emm3 (A-C5) are “Prevalent” [12, 33, 34], and they are characterized by their ability to have fibrinogen binding properties accounting for a high rate of invasive manifestations. Throughout the nine years of our surveillance, the genotypes emm1, 3 and 12, were dominant emm types without any other emm type competitors identified within their specific emm-cluster. Their epidemiological dominance and persistence are not well understood and could be explained by the absence of other circulating emm types belonging to their specific emm-clusters. An alternative explanation could be a complex antigenic structure or a specific dynamic for genetic evolution affecting immunogenic epitopes of many A–C emm types with throat tropism [35], preventing a stable and highly-specific long-lasting immunity.
The high prevalence and diversity of emm types encountered for the cluster E4 corroborate other studies [8, 33], and may indicate a variable or insufficient cluster-specific natural immune cross-protection. Recent work investigating the cross-protection capabilities against the 17 emm types of the cluster E4 identified the potential requirement of five M peptides (emm2, 8, 22, 89, and 112) to induce a bactericidal cross activity against 15/17 E4 GAS, excepting emm77 and emm114 [32]. Notably, we never recorded any “Emergent” emm type for this cluster, but seven “Sporadic” emm-genotypes were identified.
“Emergent” emm types occurred as an epidemiological shift within the clusters D4, E2, E3 and E6 that were free of any “Prevalent” emm types during all the study period. Mechanisms that can contribute to the emergence of one or more genotypes in a population are not well understood. However, risk factors and genetic modifications of the strain, including the acquisition of new virulence factors, may play variable roles depending on the emm type. Although more challenging to assess, another complementary factor is the lack of protective immunity of the population against GAS, which can thus facilitate the emergence of a specific emm type. Most of emm44, 83 and 66 strains were isolated from patients with specific risk factors such as living in poor conditions and big cities. As we reported previously, the whole genome analysis of some of emergent strains in French Brittany identified a genetic acquisition of new transposons for emm44, and emm83, and mutations resulting in a null allele of a stand-alone RopB regulator for emm66 [36–39]. The role of these genetic modifications as an explanatory mechanism for clonal emergence remained unknown, and the increase in infection incidence was recorded for only 2 to 3 years. These observations are consistent with studies reporting that short adaptive evolution driven by habitat adaptation (skin or generalist rather than throat specialist strains) underwent horizontal gene transfer events that could offer selective advantages in a susceptible population, either lacking immune protection or having a specific risk factor [35] as we observed in our population.
The European survey published in 2009 indicated that infections with emm75 strains were found only in few countries (Finland, Greece, Germany, and Romania), but remained marginal among the “Prevalent” emm types [6]. As we previously reported [40], the sharp increase of emm75 infection rate observed in 2013 was most likely related to the emergence of a new clone that acquired two new prophages encoding virulence factors (SpeC and SpeK superantigens). Herein, we failed to identify any specific risk factor (clinical or behavioural) that could explain the emergence of the genotype emm75 in a susceptible population. However, the genotype emm75 tended to become prevalent in the French Brittany population where it represents 4 to 6% of strains isolated annually. We do not know if the sustained rise of the emm75 genotype will continue, or if we will observe upsurges or epidemic waves in French Brittany as in other geographic regions. In our opinion, the emergence of genotype emm75 needs careful consideration. First, an emm75 strain isolated from blood culture in 2015 in the UK and recently sequenced (Strain: NCTC13751, GeneBank accession: LS483437) exhibits the same genetic modifications that we have observed in strains isolated in French Brittany. Second, it has recently been reported in Portugal an increasing trend of invasive infections due to the genotype emm75 that also shares the superantigens genes speC and speK [41]. All these strains deserve to be analyzed more in-depth to decipher if this emergence corresponded to the same clonal spread. Our observation can be paralleled with the nationwide increase in invasive disease due to the genotype emm89. This genotype upsurges last decades and has recently been associated with the emergence of a new successful clade variant that has undergone several genetic modifications affecting known virulence factors [42].
Finally, the emergence of the emm87 genotype observed in 2013 is remarkable because it predominates in England while seldom isolated in the rest of Europe [6]. The spreading of the genotype emm87 may have occurred in French Brittany, given the geographical proximity and frequent exchanges between the two countries.
The monocentric design is the main limitation of our study, and other population-based investigations are required to confirm our findings. However, many strengths have to be considered, including the prospective and longitudinal collection of strains from invasive and non-invasive infections with their attached clinical data. Also, the geographic delimitation to a population-based recovery of GAS strain enabled us to observe a comprehensive dynamic of circulating emm types.
After nine years of GAS infection surveillance, we described a high diversity of circulating GAS emm types and characterized accurately epidemiological shifts and dynamic profiles of five successive “Emergent” emm types (emm44, 66, 75, 83 and 87). They occurred within emm-clusters different from those gathering “Prevalent” emm types that could suggest a population susceptibility potentially due to a weak natural immune cluster-specific cross-protection. The emergence of the genotype emm75 occurred in 2013 is now marked by a sustained prevalence suggesting a potential expansion of a successful clone. Dynamic monitoring of GAS infections by combining at least molecular emm typing and cluster classification remains the keystone strategy for epidemiological surveillance.
Supporting information
The reported numbers corresponded to the 21 areas of French Brittany: 1) Auray; 2) Brest; 3) Broceliande; 4) Centre Bretagne; 5) COB; 6) Cornouaille; 7) Dinan; 8) Fougères; 9) Guingamp; 10) Lorient; 11) Morlaix; 12) Ploermel; 13) Pontivy; 14) Redon; 15) Rennes; 16) Saint-Malo; 17) Saint Brieuc; 18) Tregor-Goelo; 19) Vallons-Vilaine; 20) Vannes; 21) Vitré. Regional hospitals (*) and University Hospital Centres (•) were indicated on the map. For each area, the average number of cases collected/100,000 inhabitants/year were reported according to the colour legend.
(DOCX)
All infections (green), non-invasive (blue), and invasive infections (red) were broken down by year, and rates of infections were given for each quarter. 1: January to March; 2: April to June; 3: July to September; 4: October to December.
(DOCX)
The rates for males, invasive infections and the portal of entry were indicated for each age group. ENT-Resp = Ear Nose and Throat and Respiratory. *n = 889 infections/942 collected cases (49 carriage and 4 cases with missing values were not included).
(DOCX)
For each identified emm types, the total number of GAS isolates (n) and percentage of the total (%) were indicated in the corresponding column. For the most frequent genotypes (n > 10 isolates) we performed a categorical analysis (Fisher’s exact test) to compare the rate of their occurrence “In Rennes” vs “Out Rennes” groups. Simpson’s Indexes of Diversity (SDI) and their comparison were given at the bottom of the table. * Among the 942 emm-typed GAS isolates, 1 missed value for the residential area.
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr Pascal Vincent (microbiologist in the UHC of Rennes and currently retired) and Dr Jean-Francois Ygout (microbiologist in the general Hospital of Lorient and currently retired) for their contribution to this work by managing the database and sending GAS isolates, respectively, the microbiologists of the hospital of Dinan, Lorient, Pontivy, Saint-Brieuc, and Vannes for sending GAS isolates, all the members of the Department of Bacteriology—UHC of Rennes for their technical support and assistance in this study.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the University Rennes-1 Medical School, and by University Hospital Center of Rennes-France and did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- 1.Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, Cole JN, Gillen CM, Henningham A, et al. Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of group A Streptococcus Clinical microbiology reviews. 2014;27(2):264–301. 10.1128/CMR.00101-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2005;5(11):685–94. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70267-X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lancefield RC. Persistence of type-specific antibodies in man following infection with group A streptococci. J Exp Med. 1959;110(2):271–92. Epub 1959/08/01. 10.1084/jem.110.2.271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beall B, Facklam R, Thompson T. Sequencing emm-specific PCR products for routine and accurate typing of group A streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(4):953–8. 10.1128/JCM.34.4.953-958.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sheel M, Moreland NJ, Fraser JD, Carapetis J. Development of Group A streptococcal vaccines: an unmet global health need. Expert review of vaccines. 2016;15(2):227–38. 10.1586/14760584.2016.1116946 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luca-Harari B, Darenberg J, Neal S, Siljander T, Strakova L, Tanna A, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of severe Streptococcus pyogenes disease in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(4):1155–65. 10.1128/JCM.02155-08 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.O’Loughlin RE, Roberson A, Cieslak PR, Lynfield R, Gershman K, Craig A, et al. The epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infection and potential vaccine implications: United States, 2000–2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(7):853–62. 10.1086/521264 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shulman ST, Tanz RR, Dale JB, Beall B, Kabat W, Kabat K, et al. Seven-year surveillance of north american pediatric group A streptococcal pharyngitis isolates. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):78–84. 10.1086/599344 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steer AC, Law I, Matatolu L, Beall BW, Carapetis JR. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2009;9(10):611–6. Epub 2009/09/26. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70178-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smeesters PR, Mardulyn P, Vergison A, Leplae R, Van Melderen L. Genetic diversity of Group A Streptococcus M protein: implications for typing and vaccine development. Vaccine. 2008;26(46):5835–42. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.037 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baroux N, D’Ortenzio E, Amedeo N, Baker C, Ali Alsuwayyid B, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, et al. The emm-cluster typing system for Group A Streptococcus identifies epidemiologic similarities across the pacific region. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(7):e84–92. 10.1093/cid/ciu490 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Koutouzi F, Tsakris A, Chatzichristou P, Koutouzis E, Daikos GL, Kirikou E, et al. Streptococcus pyogenes emm Types and Clusters during a 7-Year Period (2007 to 2013) in Pharyngeal and Nonpharyngeal Pediatric Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(7):2015–21. 10.1128/JCM.00301-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luca-Harari B, Ekelund K, van der Linden M, Staum-Kaltoft M, Hammerum AM, Jasir A. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections in Denmark during 2003 and 2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(1):79–86. 10.1128/JCM.01626-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bessen DE, Lizano S. Tissue tropisms in group A streptococcal infections. Future Microbiol. 2010;5(4):623–38. 10.2217/fmb.10.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bessen DE, Carapetis JR, Beall B, Katz R, Hibble M, Currie BJ, et al. Contrasting molecular epidemiology of group A streptococci causing tropical and nontropical infections of the skin and throat. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(4):1109–16. Epub 2000/09/09. 10.1086/315842 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bessen DE, McGregor KF, Whatmore AM. Relationships between emm and multilocus sequence types within a global collection of Streptococcus pyogenes. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:59 10.1186/1471-2180-8-59 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sanderson-Smith M, De Oliveira DM, Guglielmini J, McMillan DJ, Vu T, Holien JK, et al. A systematic and functional classification of Streptococcus pyogenes that serves as a new tool for molecular typing and vaccine development. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(8):1325–38. 10.1093/infdis/jiu260 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gallo V, Egger M, McCormack V, Farmer PB, Ioannidis JP, Kirsch-Volders M, et al. STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology—Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42(1):1–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02561.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lamagni TL, Darenberg J, Luca-Harari B, Siljander T, Efstratiou A, Henriques-Normark B, et al. Epidemiology of severe Streptococcus pyogenes disease in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(7):2359–67. 10.1128/JCM.00422-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Frost HR, Laho D, Sanderson-Smith ML, Licciardi P, Donath S, Curtis N, et al. Immune Cross-Opsonization Within emm Clusters Following Group A Streptococcus Skin Infection: Broadening the Scope of Type-Specific Immunity. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(9):1523–31. 10.1093/cid/cix599 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beachey EH, Seyer JM, Dale JB, Simpson WA, Kang AH. Type-specific protective immunity evoked by synthetic peptide of Streptococcus pyogenes M protein. Nature. 1981;292(5822):457–9. 10.1038/292457a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lamagni TL, Efstratiou A, Vuopio-Varkila J, Jasir A, Schalen C. The epidemiology of severe Streptococcus pyogenes associated disease in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2005;10(9):179–84. 10.2807/esm.10.09.00563-en . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mason KL, Aronoff DM. Postpartum group A Streptococcus sepsis and maternal immunology. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(2):91–100. Epub 2011/10/26. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01083.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Davies HD, McGeer A, Schwartz B, Green K, Cann D, Simor AE, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(8):547–54. 10.1056/NEJM199608223350803 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smit PW, Lindholm L, Lyytikainen O, Jalava J, Patari-Sampo A, Vuopio J. Epidemiology and emm types of invasive group A streptococcal infections in Finland, 2008–2013. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(10):2131–6. 10.1007/s10096-015-2462-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Plainvert C, Loubinoux J, Bidet P, Doloy A, Touak G, Dmytruk N, et al. [Epidemiology of Streptococcus pyogenes invasive diseases in France (2007–2011)]. Arch Pediatr. 2014;21 Suppl 2:S62–8. 10.1016/S0929-693X(14)72262-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meisal R, Andreasson IK, Hoiby EA, Aaberge IS, Michaelsen TE, Caugant DA. Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates Causing Severe Infections in Norway in 2006 to 2007: emm Types, Multilocus Sequence Types, and Superantigen Profiles. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):842–51. Epub 2010/01/01. 10.1128/JCM.01312-09 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Darenberg J, Luca-Harari B, Jasir A, Sandgren A, Pettersson H, Schalen C, et al. Molecular and clinical characteristics of invasive group A streptococcal infection in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(4):450–8. 10.1086/519936 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cohen R, Levy C, Bonacorsi S, Wollner A, Koskas M, Jung C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical symptoms and rapid diagnostic test in group A streptococcal perianal infections in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(2):267–70. 10.1093/cid/ciu794 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Green NM, Zhang S, Porcella SF, Nagiec MJ, Barbian KD, Beres SB, et al. Genome sequence of a serotype M28 strain of group A Streptococcus: potential new insights into puerperal sepsis and bacterial disease specificity. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(5):760–70. 10.1086/430618 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sitkiewicz I, Green NM, Guo N, Mereghetti L, Musser JM. Lateral gene transfer of streptococcal ICE element RD2 (region of difference 2) encoding secreted proteins. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:65 Epub 2011/04/05. 10.1186/1471-2180-11-65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dale JB, Smeesters PR, Courtney HS, Penfound TA, Hohn CM, Smith JC, et al. Structure-based design of broadly protective group A streptococcal M protein-based vaccines. Vaccine. 2017;35(1):19–26. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shulman ST, Tanz RR, Dale JB, Steer AC, Smeesters PR. Added value of the emm-cluster typing system to analyze group A Streptococcus epidemiology in high-income settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(11):1651–2. 10.1093/cid/ciu649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rattanavong S, Dance DA, Davong V, Baker C, Frost H, Phetsouvanh R, et al. Group A streptococcal strains isolated in Lao People’s Democratic Republic from 2004 to 2013. Epidemiology and infection. 2016;144(8):1770–3. 10.1017/S0950268815002927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bessen DE, McShan WM, Nguyen SV, Shetty A, Agrawal S, Tettelin H. Molecular epidemiology and genomics of group A Streptococcus Infect Genet Evol. 2015;33:393–418. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Soriano N, Vincent P, Piau C, Moullec S, Gautier P, Lagente V, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus pyogenes M/emm44 Strain STAB901, Isolated in a Clonal Outbreak in French Brittany. Genome Announc. 2014;2(6). 10.1128/genomeA.01174-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cady A, Plainvert C, Donnio PY, Loury P, Huguenet D, Briand A, et al. Clonal spread of Streptococcus pyogenes emm44 among homeless persons, Rennes, France. Emerging infectious diseases. 2011;17(2):315–7. Epub 2011/02/05. 10.3201/eid1702.101022 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Soriano N, Vincent P, Auger G, Cariou ME, Moullec S, Lagente V, et al. Full-Length Genome Sequence of Type M/emm83 Group A Streptococcus pyogenes Strain STAB1101, Isolated from Clustered Cases in Brittany. Genome Announc. 2015;3(1). 10.1128/genomeA.01459-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meygret A, Vincent P, Moullec S, Nacazume J, Adnani Y, Lavenier D, et al. Genome Sequence of the Uncommon Streptococcus pyogenes M/emm66 Strain STAB13021, Isolated from Clonal Clustered Cases in French Brittany. Genome Announc. 2016;4(4). 10.1128/genomeA.00689-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rochefort A, Boukthir S, Moullec S, Meygret A, Adnani Y, Lavenier D, et al. Full Sequencing and Genomic Analysis of Three emm75 Group A Streptococcus Strains Recovered in the Course of an Epidemiological Shift in French Brittany. Genome Announc. 2017;5(39). 10.1128/genomeA.00957-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Friaes A, Pato C, Melo-Cristino J, Ramirez M. Consequences of the variability of the CovRS and RopB regulators among Streptococcus pyogenes causing human infections. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12057 10.1038/srep12057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Turner CE, Abbott J, Lamagni T, Holden MT, David S, Jones MD, et al. Emergence of a New Highly Successful Acapsular Group A Streptococcus Clade of Genotype emm89 in the United Kingdom. MBio. 2015;6(4):e00622 10.1128/mBio.00622-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



