Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 6;58:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.09.005

Entamoeba Stage Conversion: Progress and New Insights.

Dipak Manna 1,*, Gretchen M Ehrenkaufer 1,*, Daniela Lozano-Amado 1,*, Upinder Singh 1,2,#
PMCID: PMC7746589  NIHMSID: NIHMS1630949  PMID: 33032142

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica, an anaerobic protozoan, is an important global health problem. This parasite has a biphasic life cycle consisting of a dormant cyst stage which is environmentally resistant and transmits the infection, and the proliferative trophozoite stage which is motile and causes invasive disease. The stage conversion process remains poorly understood despite being central to amoebic biology. In this review, we will highlight recent progress in our understanding of Entamoeba stage conversion including dissecting transcriptome analysis in development, characterization of transcriptional networks, demonstration of epigenetic regulation, and role of small molecules that regulate Entamoeba development.

Keywords: Entamoeba, stage conversion, transcriptome, stress response, epigenetic regulation

Introduction

The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica causes an estimated 50 million cases of invasive disease annually and is the second leading parasitic cause of death worldwide [1]. The disease is spread by contaminated food and water and is especially common in developing countries. The infectious cycle of E. histolytica begins with the ingestion of the cyst, a non-dividing, quadri-nucleate form that is able to survive in the environment due to a protective, chitin-containing cell wall [2]. After ingestion, the cyst undergoes excystation in the small intestine to produce the invasive trophozoite form. Disease caused by E. histolytica begins with the adherence of trophozoites to colonic mucins and epithelial cells leading to asymptomatic colonization or invasive disease [3].The most common disease caused by E. histolytica is amebic colitis, but infection may spread to other organs, particularly the liver, lung, and brain [4,5]. Some trophozoites then encyst, allowing cysts to be excreted in the stool and go on to infect new hosts; the factors influencing this transition are unclear. In endemic countries, individuals can get repeated episodes of invasive disease, necessitating repeated treatment [6].

Due to the lack of an established in vitro method for encystation in E. histolytica, the established model for Entamoeba development is in the related reptilian parasite, Entamoeba invadens. In E. invadens, encystation in vitro is triggered using osmotic shock and removal of glucose or other carbon source [79]. High levels of cyst formation require the addition of either 5% serum, or the serum glycoprotein mucin, which acts as a ligand for the Entamoeba membrane lectin and stimulates trophozoite aggregation [10]. Regulated excystation is also established and is achieved by exposure to water, bicarbonate and bile [11]. In this review, we will discuss some recent important developments in study of E. invadens stage conversion, including advances in our understanding of transcriptional regulation and the external triggers that initiate encystation.

Transcriptomic analysis of Entamoeba development

Application of modern techniques for studying molecular changes at a large scale have been vital for enhancing our understanding of Entamoeba stage conversion. Two key studies have looked at transcriptomic changes during E. invadens stage conversion: De Cádiz et al. [12] which used DNA microarray technology, and Ehrenkaufer and Weedall et al. [13] which employed SOLiD platform RNA-seq. Both groups looked at mid-encystation (8–24h) and mature (>48h) cyst timepoints. The two groups focused on some different timepoints, with De Cádiz et al. investigating several early encystation timepoints (0.5 and 2h) while Ehrenkaufer and Weedall et al. omitted these early times but analyzed two excystation time points (2 and 8h). As a result of these differing platforms, and differing analysis, the overall percentage of genes determined to be regulated were different between the two studies: ~65% of expressed genes changed significantly in at least one encystation time point using microarray, versus ~29% using RNA-seq.

Despite these differences, clear patterns emerged from examining the developmentally regulated genes in these datasets. In addition to the expected cyst wall related proteins, numerous genes encoding potential signaling molecules such as kinases, small GTPases and phospholipase D increased expression during encystation. Additionally, both studies identified several developmentally regulated transcription factors, including a SHAQKY-Myb domain protein whose E. histolytica ortholog was previously shown to be developmentally regulated [14]. These proteins may be involved in transduction of initial encystation signals or regulation of the terminal differentiation program. Some gene families of interest and their numbers of upand down- regulated genes are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Examples of gene families regulated during encystation in E. invadens.

For both transcriptome studies discussed (Microarray: De Cadiz et al. [12]; RNA-seq: Ehrenkaufer and Weedall et al. [13]) the total numbers of genes significantly up- or down- regulated in at least one developmental time point and the genes regulated in each category listed are shown.

Gene families Microarray RNA-seq
Up in encystation
TOTAL 1528 1329
Cyst wall 14 17
Protein kinases 115 81
Cysteine proteases 10 4
DNA repair 19 9
Transcription factors 26 12
BspA proteins 26 3
GTPase signaling 31 18
Down in encystation
TOTAL 2841 1681
Carbohydrate metabolism 20 27
Lipid metabolism 28 22
DNA metabolism 13 18
Virulence 8 8

Genes encoding proteins involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were heavily downregulated in both datasets. This is in agreement with a published metabolic profile during encystation [15], which showed that glycolysis and most other major metabolic pathways not directly related to cyst wall synthesis were decreased during encystation. Known amebic virulence factors such as the GalNAc lectin and rhomboid protease were also found to be downregulated during encystation in both datasets. Importantly, when excystation was examined, many of these downregulated genes were found to recover expression, indicating a return to a typical trophozoite state [13].

Role of small molecules and stress response in encystation

It is presumed that diverse molecular pathways are involved in the regulation of Entamoeba encystation, where uni-nucleated trophozoites transformed into quadri-nucleated mature cysts. Here, we summarize the factors and biomolecules that influence encystation (Figure 1). Environmental factors including glucose starvation and hypo-osmotic shock are the key initiators of E. invadens encystation [9]. Among other factors, addition of 5% adult bovine serum enhances the encystation efficiency; galactose-terminated glycoproteins, such as asialofetuin or mucin, the major glycoprotein comprising the mucus layer of the colon, can substitute for the 5% serum and trigger encystation [31]. Coppi et al. reported that Entamoeba encystation was enhanced when catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) were added to the encystation medium in micromolar concentrations [32]. In the classical adrenergic signaling pathway, epinephrine is presumed to increase the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Frederick and colleagues demonstrated that dibutyryl cAMP can bypass the normal adrenergic receptor-dependent step and would efficiently substitute for the galactose ligand and stimulate E. invadens encystation, suggesting that this catecholamine ligand-receptor system acts downstream of the galactose lectin and upstream of adenylyl cyclase to increase cAMP production [33]. Other pathways that have been shown to play an important role in Entamoeba growth and encystation include Ca+2 signaling [34,35], cholesteryl sulfate, a common sulfate metabolite in mammals [36], protein kinase C (PKC) [37], and sphingolipids [38,39]. There are multiple indications that lipid signaling is an important part of Entamoeba encystation. Many genes involved in lipid signaling are differentially expressed, including phospholipase D (PLD), which catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidyl choline to phosphatidic acid and has been linked to many important biological processes including vesicle transport and transduction of signals required for proliferation [12,13]. Ehrenkaufer et al. showed that PLD was upregulated during encystation and that inhibition of PLD inhibits stage conversion in E. invadens [13]. These pathways likely interact as calcium levels have been shown in other systems to influence activity of both PLD and PKC [40].

Figure 1: Schematic of regulators of Entamoeba encystation.

Figure 1:

Diverse pathways are implicated in the regulation of Entamoeba encystation, where uninucleate trophozoites transformed into quadri-nucleate mature cysts. The pathway and appearance of key regulators during the different stages of encystation (at 8, 24, 48, and 72h) are depicted. Environmental factors, including glucose starvation and hypo-osmotic shock, are the key initiators of E. invadens encystation [9]. Among the signaling molecules, Gal-terminated ligands [10], catecholamine signaling [32], cyclic AMP (cAMP) [33], cholesteryl sulfate [36], Ca+2 signaling [34, 35], PLD [13], sphingolipids [38] and NAD+ [28] have shown to enhance encystation. On the contrary galactose (gal), N-acetylglucosamine (glcN) [31] and short chain fatty acids [8] inhibit encystation. Among the transcriptional regulators of encystation, the roles of three transcription factors: Myb-dr, ERM-BP, and nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) [14,28,27] and their appearances at different time points of development are illustrated here. Epigenetic control by histone acetylation plays a key role in the regulation of Entamoeba differentiation. Encystation in presence of Trichostatin A blocks the activity of HDACs expressed in cysts and modifies the histone acetylation patterns allowing the expression of trophozoite genes and blocking the encystation pathway [8,30].

Besides the osmotic stress which facilitates E. invadens encystation, heat shock has been noted to have some overlap with encystation, as genes involved in cyst wall formation such as chitinase and Jacob are noted to be upregulated in both conditions [41]. Recent studies by Manna et al. showed that levels of NAD+ increase in heat shock in both E. invadens and E. histolytica, as well as in E. invadens encystation [28, 42]. This change regulates activity of the encystation specific transcription factor ERM-BP. Moreover, heat stress can induce the production of quadri-nucleated cyst-like structures, and multinucleated giant cells also observed due to heat stress similar to encystation, supporting the concept that heat-stress response and encystation are related [42]. Finally, a number of molecules such as galactose, N-acetylglucosamine and short chain fatty acids, have been shown to inhibit encystation [8,31]. Altogether, we have now better understanding regarding the small molecules which have an important role in Entamoeba encystation and this knowledge could be utilized to develop and in vitro encystation method for E. histolytica.

Transcription factor regulatory control and epigenetic regulation

At the structural level, the core promoters of E. histolytica contain three conserved elements: a non-consensus TATA element (GTATTTAAA), a GAAC element (AATGAACT), and an Initiator (Inr) element (AAAAATTCA) [1618]. Furthermore, these features are conserved in E. invadens, the GAAC-like core promoter motif (GAACTACAAA) is likely a combination of the previously reported GAAC and Inr regions [19]. Regarding the basal transcription machinery, a TATA box-binding protein (EhTBP) [20] the TBP-related factor 1 (EhTRF1) [21] and the TBP-associated factor 1 (EhTAF1) [22] have been studied.

In Entamoeba, transcription factors regulate gene expression involved in many important aspects of amebic biology, including virulence, oxidative stress response, cell migration, DNA replication, genome stability and stage conversion [14,19,2327]. So far, at least three transcription factors that control amebic development, including a Myb gene that is developmentally regulated (EhMyb-dr), an NF-Y complex transcription factor, and a novel transcription factor (ERM-BP) have been identified (Figure 1). EhMyb-dr belongs to the SHAQKY family of Myb genes and binds to a CCCCCC motif; overexpression in E. histolytica trophozoites showed a transcriptional profile that overlaps significantly with amebic cysts [14]. Nuclear factor complex (NF-Y) is formed by NF-YA/NF-YB/NF-YC subunits which bind to CCAAT motif and appears at a later time point of encystation (48h). NF-YB and NF-YC subunits were expressed during encystation, and the silencing of the NF-YC subunit resulted in reduced stability of the NF-Y complex and decreased encystation efficiency [27]. A novel transcription factor recently identified in E. invadens, Encystation Regulatory Motif-Binding Protein (ERM-BP) binds the CAACAAA motif in the promoters of cyst-specific genes in early encystation (24h). The function of ERM-BP is regulated by direct binding of the metabolic cofactor NAD+; binding to NAD+ changes protein conformation and facilitates ERM-BP binding to the DNA motif. Silencing of ERM-BP caused a decrease in the encystation efficiency and formation of abnormal cysts with defective cyst wall [28].

In addition to regulation by transcription factors, epigenetic mechanisms such as histone post-translational modifications, specifically histone acetylation, may be involved in the regulation of genes related to the encystation. Hyperacetylation induced by Trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, drastically decreased the percentage of encysting cells in E. invadens [29]. It was recently determined that the negative effects of histone acetylation during encystation of E. invadens are due to down-regulation of expression of subset of genes implicated in synthesis of chitin, polyamines, gamma-aminobutyric and cyst wall proteins. Additionally, in silico analysis and experimental assays suggested that an HDAC class I protein may control those genes during encystation [30]. Together, these data indicate that differential histone acetylation patterns at the promoters of trophozoite- and cyst-specific genes is required for stage conversion (Figure 1). These findings represent an important advance to understanding how molecular signals regulate transcriptional regulatory networks that are involved in the amoebic stage conversion.

E. histolytica encystation

During human infection E. histolytica cysts spontaneously form; however, the internal or external signals that induce a trophozoite to begin the process of encystation are at present unknown. Clinical studies have shown significant variability in the numbers of cysts produced by different patients [43], and it is likely that both host and parasite factors may contribute to these differences. To date, most studies of E. histolytica cysts have been performed using either cysts directly from patients or recent clinical isolates. One of the most important of these was a proteome of Entamoeba cysts derived directly from the stools of infected children [44]. The authors identified 195 proteins which were not found in previously published trophozoite proteomic and EST datasets. Cyst-specific proteins included the cyst wall proteins as expected, but also potential signaling molecules such as trans-membrane kinases and Rab family GTPases. Intriguingly, four DNA repair pathway proteins were found, similar to E. invadens transcriptome results and suggestive of a role during nuclear division. Only parasites which have developed a cyst wall were isolated, hence proteins involved in the early steps of encystation were unlikely to be identified. However, this study was an important advance in our knowledge of cyst formation in the human pathogen.

Historically, after parasites were isolated from human stool, they were cultured in complex media which included agar or egg slants and bacteria derived from the intestinal flora. Under these conditions cultures of recent clinical isolates produce cysts, although with variable efficiency [4548]. Researchers used these cultures to probe conditions that could enhance cyst production [45] and, more recently, to identify a transcriptome associated with cysts and encysting parasites [49]. Novel cyst-specific genes identified include a SHAQKY Myb domain transcription factor and cysteine proteases. Transitioning trophozoites to growth in axenic medium seems to have resulted in loss of this ability to undergo stage conversion [50]. This process of gradual reduction in encystation capacity as culture conditions diverge from the in vivo situation is illustrated in Figure 2. In addition to the effect of the loss of intestinal flora, it is likely that selection of parasites able to grow in axenic conditions is a contributing factor, as the addition of bacteria to axenic cultures does not cause cyst formation [50]. There have been multiple reports through the years [5153] of induction of cyst-like structures using various divalent cations and other factors including H2O2 [53]. These structures are viable and stain with calcofluor, indicating that cyst wall formation has begun, but are not mature, quadri-nucleated cysts. The physiological relevance of these cyst-like structures is not clear.

Figure 2: Influence of the transition from in vivo growth to axenic in vitro conditions on encystation capacity of E. histolytica.

Figure 2:

Parasites growing in the human colon are exposed to colonic epithelial cells, a complex bacterial flora, and numerous other factors such as mucin and short chain fatty acids. Additionally, there is phenotypic and potentially genetic diversity between individual parasites, allowing some to initiate stage conversion while others remain as proliferating trophozoites. Recent clinical isolates grown in xenic culture retain a capacity for spontaneous encystation, but this is lost in the process of adaptation to axenic growth. Cyst-like structures can be generated by addition of divalent cations, but these are not mature cysts. Examples of publications studying encystation utilizing each type of culture are listed.

Despite the challenges posed by the lack of in vitro encystation in E. histolytica, progress has been made in relating results from encystation studies in E. invadens to the human parasite. Multiple transcription factors and signaling molecules, including the above mentioned Myb protein, ERM-BP, and phospholipase D, can be shown to change expression or have functional relevance during stage conversion and stress response in both species [13,14,28,49,54]. Future efforts to further link findings in E. invadens to E. histolytica as well as attempts to develop a true model of E. histolytica encystation will be important in the future for our understanding of this vital biological process.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge all members of the Singh and Hernandez-Rivas laboratories for helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding sources

US, DM and GME were supported in part from NIH grant R21-AI119893. DLA was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología grant 440708.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.WHO: Entamoeba taxonomy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1997, 75:291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones MF, Newton WL: The survival of cysts of Endamoeba histolytica in water at temperatures between 45 degrees C. and 55 degrees C. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1950, 30:53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adams EB, MacLeod IN: Invasive amebiasis. I. Amebic dysentery and its complications. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977, 56:315–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hughes MA, Petri WA Jr.: Amebic liver abscess. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2000, 14:565–582, viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Petri WA, Haque R: Entamoeba histolytica brain abscess. Handb Clin Neurol 2013, 114:147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haque R, Huston CD, Hughes M, Houpt E, Petri WA Jr.: Amebiasis. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1565–1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bailey GB, Rengypian S: Osmotic stress as a factor controlling encystation of Entamoeba invadens. Arch Invest Med (Mex) 1980, 11:11–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Byers J, Faigle W, Eichinger D: Colonic short-chain fatty acids inhibit encystation of Entamoeba invadens. Cell Microbiol 2005, 7:269–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chayen A, Avron B, Mirelman D: Changes in cell surface proteins and glycoproteins during the encystation of Entamoeba invadens. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1985, 15:83–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eichinger D: A role for a galactose lectin and its ligands during encystment of Entamoeba. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2001, 48:17–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mitra BN, Pradel G, Frevert U, Eichinger D: Compounds of the upper gastrointestinal tract induce rapid and efficient excystation of Entamoeba invadens. Int J Parasitol 2010, 40:751–760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De Cadiz AE, Jeelani G, Nakada-Tsukui K, Caler E, Nozaki T: Transcriptome analysis of encystation in Entamoeba invadens. PLoS One 2013, 8:e74840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ehrenkaufer GM, Weedall GD, Williams D, Lorenzi HA, Caler E, Hall N, Singh U: The genome and transcriptome of the enteric parasite Entamoeba invadens, a model for encystation. Genome Biol 2013, 14:R77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ehrenkaufer GM, Hackney JA, Singh U: A developmentally regulated Myb domain protein regulates expression of a subset of stage-specific genes in Entamoeba histolytica. Cell Microbiol 2009, 11:898–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeelani G, Sato D, Husain A, Escueta-de Cadiz A, Sugimoto M, Soga T, Suematsu M, Nozaki T: Metabolic profiling of the protozoan parasite Entamoeba invadens revealed activation of unpredicted pathway during encystation. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Purdy JE, Pho LT, Mann BJ, Petri WA Jr.: Upstream regulatory elements controlling expression of the Entamoeba histolytica lectin. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1996, 78:91–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh U, Gilchrist CA, Schaenman JM, Rogers JB, Hockensmith JW, Mann BJ, Petri WA: Context-dependent roles of the Entamoeba histolytica core promoter element GAAC in transcriptional activation and protein complex assembly. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2002, 120:107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Singh U, Rogers JB, Mann BJ, Petri WA Jr.: Transcription initiation is controlled by three core promoter elements in the hgl5 gene of the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:8812–8817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Manna D, Ehrenkaufer GM, Singh U: Regulation of gene expression in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba invadens: identification of core promoter elements and promoters with stage-specific expression patterns. Int J Parasitol 2014, 44:837–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luna-Arias JP, Hernandez-Rivas R, de Dios-Bravo G, Garcia J, Mendoza L, Orozco E: The TATA-box binding protein of Entamoeba histolytica: cloning of the gene and location of the protein by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Microbiology 1999, 145 (Pt 1):33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •21.Narayanasamy RK, Castanon-Sanchez CA, Luna-Arias JP, Garcia-Rivera G, Avendano-Borromeo B, Labra-Barrios ML, Valdes J, Herrera-Aguirre ME, Orozco E: The Entamoeba histolytica TBP and TRF1 transcription factors are GAAC-box binding proteins, which display differential gene expression under different stress stimuli and during the interaction with mammalian cells. Parasit Vectors 2018, 11:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Shows that TATA-box binding protein (EhTBP) and the TBP-related factor 1 (EhTRF1) have different physiological process in E. histolytica.
  • •22.Avendano-Borromeo B, Narayanasamy RK, Garcia-Rivera G, Labra-Barrios ML, Lagunes-Guillen AE, Munguia-Chavez B, Castanon-Sanchez CA, Orozco E, Luna-Arias JP: Identification of the gene encoding the TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 1 (TAF1) and its putative role in the heat shock response in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Parasitol Res 2019, 118:517–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Identified a key role of TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 1 (EhTAF1), a member of basal transcription machinery, in heat shock stress in E. histolytica.
  • 23.de la Cruz OH, Muniz-Lino M, Guillen N, Weber C, Marchat LA, Lopez-Rosas I, Ruiz-Garcia E, Astudillo-de la Vega H, Fuentes-Mera L, Alvarez-Sanchez E, et al. : Proteomic profiling reveals that EhPC4 transcription factor induces cell migration through up-regulation of the 16-kDa actin-binding protein EhABP16 in Entamoeba histolytica. J Proteomics 2014, 111:46–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gilchrist CA, Moore ES, Zhang Y, Bousquet CB, Lannigan JA, Mann BJ, Petri WA: Regulation of Virulence of Entamoeba histolytica by the URE3-BP Transcription Factor. mBio 2010, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pearson RJ, Morf L, Singh U: Regulation of H2O2 stress-responsive genes through a novel transcription factor in the protozoan pathogen Entamoeba histolytica. J Biol Chem 2013, 288:4462–4474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hernandez de la Cruz O, Marchat LA, Guillen N, Weber C, Lopez Rosas I, Diaz-Chavez J, Herrera L, Rojo-Dominguez A, Orozco E, Lopez-Camarillo C: Multinucleation and Polykaryon Formation is Promoted by the EhPC4 Transcription Factor in Entamoeba histolytica. Sci Rep 2016, 6:19611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •27.Manna D, Singh U: Nuclear Factor Y (NF-Y) Modulates Encystation in Entamoeba via Stage-Specific Expression of the NF-YB and NF-YC Subunits. mBio 2019, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Demonstrates a function for the trimeric NF-Y transcription factor in Entamoeba development through binding to a CCAAT promoter motif.
  • ••28.Manna D, Lentz CS, Ehrenkaufer GM, Suresh S, Bhat A, Singh U: An NAD(+)-dependent novel transcription factor controls stage conversion in Entamoeba. Elife 2018, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Identification of a novel encystation-specific transcription factor (ERM-BP) with both nicotinamidase and DNA-binding activity. Provides a potential link between nutritional status and stage conversion in Entamoeba.
  • 29.Byers J, Eichinger D: Entamoeba invadens: restriction of ploidy by colonic short chain fatty acids. Exp Parasitol 2005, 110:203–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •30.Lozano-Amado D, Ávila-López PA, Hernández-Montes G, Briseño-Díaz P, Lopez-Rubio JJ, Carrero JC, Hernandez-Rivas R: A class I histone deacetylase is implicated in the encystation of Entamoeba invadens. International Journal for Parasitology 2020, In Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Determined that histone hyperacetylation induced by TSA treatment downregulated gene expression involved in several metabolic pathways in E. invadens encystation.
  • 31.Coppi A, Eichinger D: Regulation of Entamoeba invadens encystation and gene expression with galactose and N-acetylglucosamine. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1999, 102:67–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coppi A, Merali S, Eichinger D: The enteric parasite Entamoeba uses an autocrine catecholamine system during differentiation into the infectious cyst stage. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:8083–8090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Frederick J, Eichinger D: Entamoeba invadens contains the components of a classical adrenergic signaling system. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2004, 137:339–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Makioka A, Kumagai M, Ohtomo H, Kobayashi S, Takeuchi T: Effect of calcium antagonists, calcium channel blockers and calmodulin inhibitors on the growth and encystation of Entamoeba histolytica and E. invadens. Parasitol Res 2001, 87:833–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martinez-Higuera A, Herrera-Martinez M, Chavez-Munguia B, Valle-Solis M, Muniz-Lino MA, Cazares-Apatiga J, Rodriguez MA: Entamoeba invadens: Identification of a SERCA protein and effect of SERCA inhibitors on encystation. Microb Pathog 2015, 89:18–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mi-ichi F, Miyamoto T, Takao S, Jeelani G, Hashimoto T, Hara H, Nozaki T, Yoshida H: Entamoeba mitosomes play an important role in encystation by association with cholesteryl sulfate synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:E2884–2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Makioka A, Kumagai M, Ohtomo H, Kobayashi S, Takeuchi T: Entamoeba invadens: protein kinase C inhibitors block the growth and encystation. Exp Parasitol 2000, 95:288–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jauregui-Wade JM, Valdes J, Ayala-Sumuano JT, Avila-Garcia R, Cerbon-Solorzano J: De novo synthesis of sphingolipids plays an important role during in vitro encystment of Entamoeba invadens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019, 508:1031–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •39.Jauregui-Wade JM, Cerbon-Solorzano J, Avila-Garcia R, Ayala-Sumuano JT, Valdes J: Ceramide synthase 2 knockdown suppresses trophozoite growth, migration, in vitro encystment and excystment of Entamoeba invadens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020, 524:135–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Used an RNAi-based trigger method to knockdown an E. invadens ceramide synthase gene, and demonstrate changes in sphingomyelin levels, proliferation, and encystation.
  • 40.Siddiqi AR, Srajer GE, Leslie CC: Regulation of human PLD1 and PLD2 by calcium and protein kinase C. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1497:103–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Field J, Van Dellen K, Ghosh SK, Samuelson J: Responses of Entamoeba invadens to heat shock and encystation are related. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2000, 47:511–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •42.Manna D, Lozano-Amado D, Ehrenkaufer GM, Singh U: The NAD+ responsive transcription factor ERM-BP functions downstream of cellular aggregation and is an early regulator of development and heat shock response in Entamoeba. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 2020, In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Z of ERM-BP by tying its function to stress response in E. histolytica and formation of cell aggregates, as well as showing that it is an early effector of stge conversion.
  • 43.Mathur TN, Kaur J: The frequency of excretion of cysts of Entamoeba histolytica in known cases of non-dysenteric amoebic colitis based on 21 stool examinations. Indian J Med Res 1973, 61:330–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ali IK, Haque R, Siddique A, Kabir M, Sherman NE, Gray SA, Cangelosi GA, Petri WA Jr.: Proteomic analysis of the cyst stage of Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012, 6:e1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Balamuth W: Biological studies on Entamoeba histolytica. III. Induced encystation in several mediums, including an account of a new procedure. J Infect Dis 1951, 88:230–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cleveland LR, Collier J: Various improvements in the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica. Am J Hyg 1930, 12:606–614. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Balamuth W, Wieboldt ML: Comparative growth cycles of Entamoeba histolytica with different combinations of bacteria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1951, 31:192–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dobell C: Researches on the intestinal protozoa of monkeys and man. Parasitology 1928, 20:357–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ehrenkaufer GM, Haque R, Hackney JA, Eichinger DJ, Singh U: Identification of developmentally regulated genes in Entamoeba histolytica: insights into mechanisms of stage conversion in a protozoan parasite. Cell Microbiol 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Phillips B: Entamoeba histolytica: Concurrent Irreversible Loss of Infectivity/Pathogenicity and Encystment Potential after Prolonged Maintenance in Axenic Culture In Vitro. Exp Parasitol 1973, 34:163–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Campos-Gongora E, Viader-Salvado JM, Martinez-Rodriguez HG, Zuniga-Charles MA, Galindo JM, Said-Fernandez S: Mg, Mn, and Co ions enhance the formation of Entamoeba histolytica cyst-like structures resistant to sodium dodecyl sulfate. Arch Med Res 2000, 31:162–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chayen A, Avron B, Nuchamowitz Y, Mirelman D: Appearance of sialoglycoproteins in encysting cells of Entamoeba histolytica. Infect Immun 1988, 56:673–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aguilar-Diaz H, Diaz-Gallardo M, Laclette JP, Carrero JC: In vitro induction of Entamoeba histolytica cyst-like structures from trophozoites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010, 4:e607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aguilar-Diaz H, Carrero JC, Arguello-Garcia R, Laclette JP, Morales-Montor J: Cyst and encystment in protozoan parasites: optimal targets for new life-cycle interrupting strategies? Trends Parasitol 2011, 27:450–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES