Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that affects the myelinated central nervous system (CNS) neurons and triggers physical and cognitive disabilities. Conventional therapy is based on disease-modifying drugs that control disease severity but can also be deleterious. Complementary medicines have been adopted and evidence indicates that yeast supplements can improve symptoms mainly by modulating the immune response. In this investigation, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its selenized derivative (Selemax) in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Female C57BL/6 mice submitted to EAE induction were orally supplemented with these yeasts by gavage from day 0 to day 14 after EAE induction. Both supplements determined significant reduction in clinical signs concomitantly with diminished Th1 immune response in CNS, increased proportion of Foxp3+ lymphocytes in inguinal and mesenteric lymph nodes and increased microbiota diversity. However, Selemax was more effective clinically and immunologically; it reduced disease prevalence more sharply, increased the proportion of CD103+ dendritic cells expressing high levels of PD-L1 in mesenteric lymph nodes and reduced the intestinal inflammatory process more strongly than S. cerevisiae. These results suggest a clear gut-brain axis modulation by selenized S. cerevisiae and suggest their inclusion in clinical trials.
Subject terms: Immunology, Autoimmunity, Mucosal immunology
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered the most common inflammatory and demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Despite some controversy, there is a large body of evidence that MS is an autoimmune pathology, mainly mediated by specific immune response against the myelin sheath that wraps around nerve fibers1. T cell subsets, specially T helper (Th)-1 and Th17, cytotoxic T and innate cells as macrophages and microglia have been deeply implicated in MS pathobiology2. Details of MS immunopathogenesis have been revealed with the help of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is an animal model induced mainly in mice by immunization with CNS antigens associated with complete Freund´s adjuvant and frequently with pertussis toxin3.
MS treatment is mostly based on the use of the so-called disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Currently approved DMT include interferon (IFN)-β, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and alemtuzumab4. In general, these drugs modulate or suppress different stages of the ongoing autoimmune response5. Despite their undeniable benefit, mainly in the relapsing–remitting MS, efficacy, safety, tolerability and compliance to treatment may vary widely among patients6,7. Severe side effects as cardiomyopathy, bradyarrhythmias, autoimmune thyroiditis and infections have been recorded8,9.
Considering the limitation of classical treatments, complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) have been suggested and some already adopted in MS therapy10,11. Roy Swank proposed a low saturated fat diet to treat MS around 195012–14 and diet supplementation with organic, gluten-free and allergen-free ingredients have been beneficial to MS patients15. A review containing scientifically unproven data sustains the use of specific diets in the management of MS, suggesting a relationship between them and disease progression16. The immunomodulatory properties of CAM have been studied and their effectiveness in MS has been investigated. A relationship among diet, gut microbiota and MS has been demonstrated, reinforcing the presumption that prebiotic and probiotic supplementation could modulate the microbiome and autoimmunity in MS17,18. A great deal of knowledge is already established concerning how eubiosis/dysbiosis conditions are established19 and this allowed to select natural supplements with the ability to restore or modify the microbiota, amplifying therefore, the possibility to study probiotics as CAM.
In this context, bacterial and yeast probiotics have been tested in experimental and human MS. The oral administration of heat-killed Candida kefyr, for example, clearly decreased EAE severity. This protective effect occurred along with significant changes in intestinal immunity and microbiota as decreased Th17 cells, increased regulatory T and CD103+ dendritic cells (DC) and increased and decreased proportion of Lactobacillales and Bacteroides, respectively20. EAE neuroinflammation has also been controlled by the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 1793821. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is considered a safe probiotic, has also been effective in controlling experimental vaginal candidiasis22 and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection23. Even though S. cerevisiae was not directly tested in EAE, supplementation with molecules and fractions derived from it as mannanoligosaccharide and β-glucan triggered promising results. Oral intake of mannanoligosaccharide for two weeks in health BALB/c mice resulted in increased Lactobacillus and decreased Enterobacteriaceae, including Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria24. The supplementation of turbot larvae fish Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) with a fungal derivative rich in β-glucan altered their microbiota and reduced gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in total larvae tissue25. Also, a yeast-derived β-glucan- and mannan-rich particle called zymosan ameliorated both chronic and relapsing EAE26.
Selenium (Se) is a micronutrient essential for physiological processes that due to its antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties has also been considered useful for controlling inflammation27. The oral supplementation with Se suppressed immunological and serological features of lupus, as total B cells and autoantibodies, in B6.Sle1b mice model28. Concerning microbiota, mice colonized by transplantation with faecal microbiota from Se-enriched supplemented donors showed resistance to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis and Salmonella typhimurium infection. The protection through microbiota modulation was associated with reduction of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α and with increased ZO-1 and claudin-1 expression in the colon, two tight junction proteins involved in the gut barrier function29. Considering the properties mentioned above about S. cerevisiae and the fact that its effect was not tested in EAE yet, we hypothesized that it could elicit microbiota and immunological modulation capable to control EAE development. We also envisaged that S. cerevisiae selenization could improve the supposed beneficial effect of S. cerevisiae in EAE. In this scenario, the present research was designed to examine the potential applicability of S. cerevisiae and selenium-enriched S. cerevisiae (Selemax) in EAE that is the most widely used animal model to investigate new therapies for MS.
Results
Clinical EAE development is attenuated by S. cerevisiae and its selenized derivative
To evaluate the effect of supplementation with the yeast in the clinical EAE development, C57BL/6 mice received daily oral doses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or its selenized derivative (Selemax) for 14 days as demonstrated in Fig. 1a. The supplementation by itself did not trigger body weight variation. As expected, EAE mice lost a significant percentage of body weight, which was prevented in both treatments (p = 0.0185 and p = 0.0006 for S. cerevisiae and Selemax, respectively) (Fig. 2a). EAE development, initially assessed by prevalence and clinical score, was also affected by both supplementations. Selemax reduced the disease prevalence by 47.6% (p < 0.0001) whereas S. cerevisiae reduced by only 22.2% (p = 0.0003) in comparison to EAE (Fig. 2b). EAE mice supplemented with S. cerevisiae or Selemax developed a significantly milder disease, indicated by lower clinical scores (p ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 2c) and by lower cumulative scores (Table 1) in comparison to non-supplemented EAE mice. These findings were consistent with the histopathological analysis that revealed less inflammation and demyelination in lumbar spinal cord samples from supplemented EAE mice (Fig. 2d). Concerning to the Se concentration, only Selemax supplemented group presented higher serum level of Se in comparison to CTL (p < 0.0001), EAE (p < 0.0001) and EAE/S. cerevisiae (p < 0.0001) groups (Fig. 2e). The serum levels of urea and alkaline phosphatase was higher in CTL group in comparison to EAE (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0003), EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0001) and EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001) groups (Fig. 2f,h). No difference was observed in relation to creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase serum levels (Fig. 2g,i,j).
Table 1.
Groups | Days | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
EAE | 0 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 34 | 44 | 52 |
EAE/S. cerevisiae | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 16* | 26* | 34* |
EAE/Selemax | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 18* | 27* | 30** |
Downregulation of Th1 in the CNS is more accentuated in Selemax supplemented EAE mice
To better characterize the degree of neuroinflammation, we evaluated gene expression in lumbar spinal cord samples and cytokine production by CNS cell cultures, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. An inverse correlation was observed considering the expression of mRNA for TAU and Tbx21 (Th1) in supplemented EAE mice (Fig. 3a-c). mRNA expression for Rorc (Th17) and Foxp3 (regulatory T cells - Treg) was unaffected by any of the supplements, while Selemax significantly decreased Tgf (TGF-β) mRNA expression (p = 0.0054) (Fig. 3d).
Cells from both experimental groups were adjusted to the same concentration and cultured in the presence of MOG35-55 to quantify cytokine production. The number of leukocytes was also significantly lower in the CNS of Selemax supplemented EAE mice (Fig. 3e). Even though IFN-γ and TNF-α were similarly downregulated in EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0261 and p = 0.0091) and EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0079 and p = 0.0094) groups (Fig. 3f,g), a significant reduction in IL-2 (p = 0.0074) and IL-17A (p = 0.0348) levels was only observed in Selemax-treated EAE mice (Fig. 3h,i). No differences were observed in IL-6 and IL-10 levels (Fig. 3j,k).
Yeast supplementation increases Foxp3+ T cells in inguinal lymph nodes
To understand the mechanism involved in this protection, we initially characterized the CD4+ T cell composition in the spleen and inguinal lymph nodes. The number of total leukocytes was significantly lower in spleen samples from Selemax supplemented EAE mice (p = 0.0369) (Fig. 4a). On the other hand, after the stimulation with MOG35-55, splenocytes from EAE, EAE/S. cerevisiae and EAE/Selemax groups produced similar amounts of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 (Fig. 4b–d,f,g). The only exception was IL-17A that was produced in lower levels by Selemax supplemented animals than the S. cerevisiae supplemented ones (p = 0.0064) (Fig. 4e). Even though the proportion of T helper cells (Th - CD3+CD4+) in inguinal lymph nodes was similar in all experimental groups (Fig. 4i), the proportion of regulatory T cells (Treg - CD25+Foxp3+) was similarly upregulated by both, S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0044) and Selemax (p = 0.0027) (Fig. 4h,j). Nonetheless, the ratio between Treg and Th cells was higher in the Selemax group (p = 0.0069) (Fig. 4k).
Selenization increases the tolerogenic potential of S. cerevisiae
Considering that mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) play a major role as an inducing site of intestinal tolerance30,31, our next step was to evaluate the effect of these yeasts in parameters indicative of immunological tolerance. The total leukocyte number and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells in MLN was similar among groups (Fig. 5a,b). Nonetheless, Selemax supplementation enhanced the proportion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells (Fig. 5c) and the ratio between Treg and Th cells (Fig. 5d) in comparison to EAE group (p = 0.0191 and p = 0.0617). In addition, the evaluation of dendritic cell (DC - CD11c+MHCIIHigh) subsets (Fig. 5e) and the expression of PD-L1 in the subset of tolerogenic DC (CD11b-CD103+) (Fig. 5f) indicated that selenization can increase the tolerogenic potential of S. cerevisiae. Concerning CD11b+ DC subsets, the proportion of CD11b+CD103- DC (Fig. 5g) was significantly reduced in both EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0363) and EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0044) groups and CD11b+CD103+ DC (Fig. 5h) was reduced only in EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0141). The percentage of CD11b-CD103+ tolerogenic DC was higher in both EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0379) and EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0095) groups in comparison to EAE group (Fig. 5i). Despite this, tolerogenic DC from EAE/Selemax expressed a significantly higher amount of PD-L1 (p = 0.0197) in comparison to EAE group (Fig. 5j). The same profile was observed in non-EAE mice (control group). Only Selemax supplementation increased the percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells (p = 0.0190) and CD11b-CD103+ tolerogenic DC (p = 0.0502) (Supplementary Fig. 1a and 1b, respectively).
S. cerevisiae and Selemax determine distinct changes in the microbiota
Modulation of intestinal immunity by S. cerevisiae has been mainly attributed to its ability to change microbiota32. Based on this evidence, we used high-throughput sequencing of faecal samples, expressed by operational taxonomic units (OTUs), to investigate the effect of supplementation with S. cerevisiae and its selenized derivative on the composition of microbiota. The β-diversity metric, represented by the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), indicated that microbiota was different among the three groups (Fig. 6a). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) revealed that the bacterial community structure in EAE group was different from EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.029) or EAE/Selemax (p = 0.011) groups and between the two supplemented groups (p = 0.014). Regarding α-diversity metrics, were evaluated the absolute abundance, richness, evenness, Shannon–Wiener diversity index and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index. EAE group had increased absolute abundance (absolute number of bacteria in the sample) and richness (the number of OTUs) in comparison to CTL group (p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0098) (Fig. 6b,c). At the family level these differences were mainly related to the detection of OTUs in Christensenellaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and S24-7 in EAE group but not in CTL group; whereas at genus level, the same was observed concerning Adlercreutzia, Anaerostipes, Coprococcus, Dorea, Oscillospira and Ruminococcus genera. The supplementation with Selemax decreased the absolute abundance in EAE mice (p = 0.0084) (Fig. 6b) but did not alter the richness. Additionally, the supplementation with Selemax increased evenness (p = 0.0309) and both supplementations, S. cerevisiae and Selemax, increased Shannon–Wiener diversity index (p = 0.0279 and p = 0.0234, respectively) in comparison to CTL group (Fig. 6d,e). The phylogenetic diversity (Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index) did not differ between EAE and supplemented groups (Fig. 6f).
Lastly, we analyzed the relative abundance of taxonomic groups in the supplemented EAE-mice. At the phylum level (Fig. 6g), Bacteroidetes relative abundance in EAE mice was higher than EAE mice supplemented with S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0044) or Selemax (p = 0.0135) whereas the Firmicutes phylum was lower in EAE group in comparison to EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0110) or EAE/Selemax (p = 0.0163) groups. At the family level, we observed an increase in the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae in EAE/S. cerevisiae (p = 0.0017) and Clostridiaceae in EAE/Selemax group (p = 0.0176) in comparison to EAE group (Fig. 6h). When differences were evaluated at the genus level, only S. cerevisiae supplementation triggered a significant microbiota modulation. The genus Turicibacter was reduced (p = 0.0024), whereas the Lactobacillus one was increased (p < 0.0001) in EAE/S. cerevisiae in comparison to EAE group (Fig. 6i).
Selemax controls intestinal inflammation better than S. cerevisiae
Considering that both yeasts increased the diversity of microbiota and altered the relative abundance of some bacterial groups, we evaluated whether microbiota modulation was related to different degrees of intestinal inflammation. When compared to the healthy control group, the villus of EAE animals were enlarged, presented reduction in length and displayed a significant increase in mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells, suggesting the presence of neutrophils infiltrating the lamina propria as well as the submucosa. In addition, an influx of such polymorphonuclear cells was detected in the gut lumen of EAE mice (arrows in the second panel), which is indicative of severe inflammation. S. cerevisiae and Selemax-supplemented mice presented a significant reduction in the cell infiltrate in the lamina propria however, the intestinal structure was still altered in comparison to non-EAE group (Fig. 7). Selemax supplementation was slightly more effective in attenuating gut inflammation. Notably, we also detected the presence of yeasts in both treated groups (as indicated in the upright insert in the third panel) suggesting, therefore, their gut accumulation after treatment.
Gut-homing of myelin-specific Th17 has been described as a pivotal step for the development of EAE33. Assays involving gene expression in intestinal samples and cytokine production by gut explant cultures were then performed to evaluate if supplementation was affecting the local level of T cell subsets, including Th17 and Treg, and of immunoregulatory molecules. A significant reduction was observed in the expression of Tbx21 (p = 0.0151) (Fig. 8a), Rorc (p = 0.0338) (Fig. 8b) and Gata3 (Th2) (p = 0.0015) (Fig. 8c) mRNA levels in Selemax supplemented EAE-mice compared to non-supplemented EAE-animals. No differences were observed among the three experimental groups concerning the expression of genes related to Treg cells as Foxp3 (Fig. 8d), Tgf (Fig. 8e) and Ido (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase) (Fig. 8i). The expression of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in the interaction with S. cerevisiae was also evaluated. Both products significantly reduced the expression of Tlr4 (p = 0.0451) (Fig. 8h) but not any other PRRs measured, like Clec7 (Fig. 8f) and Tlr2 (Fig. 8g).
Corroborating with the findings of gene expression, gut explant immersion cultures from EAE mice supplemented with Selemax showed reduced production of IFN-γ (p = 0.0654) (Fig. 8k), IL-17A (p = 0.0074) (Fig. 8m) and IL-10 (p = 0.0513) (Fig. 8j) when compared to the untreated EAE group. Similarly, the production of IFN-γ (p = 0.0309), TNF-α (p = 0.0369) and IL-17A (p = 0.0027) were significantly reduced in S. cerevisiae supplemented group (Fig. 8k–m), compared to the EAE group. No differences were observed in IL-6 (Fig. 8n) and IL-2 (Fig. 8o) production in both supplemented groups in comparison to EAE animals. Gene expression and cytokine production were used to calculate the fold change of data from supplemented groups in relation to the EAE group (Fig. 8p). This overview of fold change clearly revealed that Selemax supplementation improved the benefits of S. cerevisiae in the context of EAE. As can be observed, the selenized yeast decreased most inflammatory parameters and simultaneously increased tolerogenic indicators in the intestinal environment, as Foxp3 (p = 0.0010) and Ido (p = 0.0161) (Fig. 8p).
Discussion
In the current study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its selenized derivative named Selemax to control EAE development. Both yeast preparations were clearly able to control clinical disease evolution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report supporting the usage of S. cerevisiae and Selemax to control experimental MS. This seems a relevant contribution because yeast-rich diets or yeast supplementation have been used for a long time worldwide, in a series of settings, without side effect records. S. cerevisiae is one of the most well-known yeast being predominantly employed for food fermentation and used for centuries in bread-making and production of alcoholic beverages such as wines and beers34. Besides the use of wild type strains, engineered S. cerevisiae strains are being largely employed as commercially profitable cell systems for application in bioprocesses aiming the synthesis of biopharmaceuticals and therapeutic proteins35,36. Another application of S. cerevisiae is its enrichment with essential elements for the organism's homeostasis, such as iron37 and selenium (Se)38,39. The enrichment of S. cerevisiae yeast with Se has been previously reported and increased its immunomodulatory potential. The oral administration of S. cerevisiae protected mice against mucositis and reduced the inflammatory response in the intestinal tissue and this effect was potentiated when it was enriched with Se40. Se has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties which are particularly relevant in CNS diseases41. Only a few reports have addressed the relevance of Se levels in MS patients. Significantly lower serum levels were described in one study42 whereas no alterations were found in two other investigations, in comparison to healthy controls43,44. In the present work, no differences were observed concerning serum Se concentration between non-EAE and EAE-mice. As expected, only Selemax supplemented group presented higher serum level of Se. Of note, these high Se levels were not associated with an evident renal or hepatic toxicity.
We hypothesized that the Se-enriched yeast could be a safe approach to achieve modulation of both, microbiota and autoimmune response in the context of EAE. Our initial findings already suggested that selenization was improving S. cerevisiae ability to control EAE development; this was indicated by the lower paralysis prevalence in this experimental model. Clinical protection in both supplemented groups was associated with less inflammation and demyelination in the CNS. Besides, a more detailed analysis of the cells eluted from this tissue confirmed the lower inflammatory process in the Selemax supplemented EAE-mice. They presented a reduced number of leukocytes in the CNS, including Th1 cells, and produced less encephalitogenic cytokines. In addition, the level of TAU mRNA was statistically higher in the EAE/Selemax group. Tau belongs to the microtubule-associated proteins family, essential for microtubule assembly in neurons. Usually found in axons, the protein can also be translocated to the cell body and dendrites and the abnormal deposition of modified tau in the neurons is a common aspect of many neurodegenerative diseases called “tauopathies”45. The role of this protein has also been investigated in EAE/MS. Mice devoid of tau protein presented higher susceptibility to neuronal damage, suggesting that tau integrity is relevant to avoid axonal damage in EAE mice46. In MS patients, the lower levels of tau in the cerebrospinal fluid have been correlated with parenchymal brain loss47 and may denote axonal degeneration48. In addition, we observed a lower expression of tgf in CNS samples from Selemax supplemented EAE-mice. It has been described that early production of TGF-β1 by glial cells creates a dangerous environment for the initiation of autoimmune inflammation whereas pharmacological inhibition of TGF-β signaling ameliorated the disease signs and reduced pathogenic T cells and IL-6 expression in the CNS49. The reduction of neuroinflammation and increased TAU expression in CNS observed in EAE-mice supplemented with Selemax support the enhanced protective effect of Se-enriched yeast in relation to non-enriched S. cerevisiae yeast and reinforce the relevance of our findings.
The ensuing experiments were done to investigate if these distinct levels of protection were due to differential immunomodulatory ability on the spleen or the regional lymph nodes. Even though a few differences were observed between S. cerevisiae and Selemax supplemented mice concerning the number of spleen cells and proportion of Treg (CD25+Foxp3+), they did not seem relevant enough to explain the most pronounced protective effect of selenized yeast. However, the data obtained from the MLN revealed a higher percentage of Treg and tolerogenic DC (CD11b-CD103+) in Selemax than in S. cerevisiae-supplemented mice. These findings are in consonance with literature data that supports the contribution of these cells to control inflammation in EAE and MS20,50,51. In addition, these tolerogenic DC expressed higher levels of PD-L1. The contribution of PD-L1 expression in DC as a mechanism to limit the initial activation of myelin-reactive CD4+ T cells was already reported in EAE52. Also, among four distinct DC subsets expressing CD103 and/or PD-L1 in MLN, only CD11b-CD103+PD-L1High DC subset was a higher inducer of Foxp3+ T cells53. These findings may sugest that selenization is acting, at least partially, by increasing the DC/Treg pathway. Findings of previous literature reports support this viewpoint. In an iodine-induced autoimmune thyroiditis model, the percentage of Treg cells and the expression of Foxp3 mRNA were increased by treatment with sodium selenite in drinking water54. As reviewed by Nettleford and Prabhu55, Se acts on intestinal immunity through upregulation of the nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma leading to differentiation of Treg and inhibition of Th1 and Th17. Se also inhibits NF-κB, decreasing, therefore, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines that are required for T helper cell differentiation.
To better understand the mechanism by which these two supplements were being protective and possibly help to elucidate the greater effectiveness of Selemax, we analyzed the faecal microbiota. The results clearly indicated that both supplements were able to increase microbiota diversity in EAE-mice, but only Selemax was able to reduce the enhanced absolute abundance associated with the disease. A diversified microbiota is generally considered beneficial to the health56,57; conversely, the decline in microbiota diversity has been linked to the rise of modern diseases as obesity, asthma, food allergies, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and cognitive disorders58. A low-diversity microbiota contributes to decreasing microbiota resilience and stability and changes the growth of some microbes relative to others59. Recently, a number of studies showing that MS patients and EAE mice exhibit gut dysbiosis disclosed the gut microbiome as a relevant player in the development of this disease60–64. In the present work, EAE development was associated with an increased absolute abundance and richness and the detection of some bacteria not observed in non-EAE mice. EAE mice exhibited dysbiosis associated, at least partially, to the detection of an increased abundance of Dorea and Ruminococcus genera, similarly to what is observed in patients with MS62,63. Considering that the disease causes dysbiosis related to bacterial abundance, we evaluated if yeast supplementation altered the relative abundance of bacterial community at different taxonomic levels. At the phylum level, both supplements increased Firmicutes and decreased Bacteroidetes phyla. Considering that the Bacteroidetes phylum has been related to an inflammatory profile65, the reduction of this taxon may have contributed to protection. A higher abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Clostridiaceae families, both from the Firmicutes phylum, was detected in faecal samples of S. cerevisiae and Selemax supplemented EAE groups, respectively. Considering that members of Lactobacillaceae and Clostridiaceae family were significantly decreased in MS patients63, their increase in supplemented EAE groups could be related to protection. Results observed in experimental diseases, including EAE, support this possibility. For instance, the oral administration of heat-killed Candida kefyr to EAE mice resulted in disease protection associated with higher Lactobacillales abundance and increased Treg proportion20. The direct role of Lactobacillus in inflammation has been linked to the differentiation of Treg cells in MLN of mice fed with L. casei66 and related to autoimmunity suppression after remodelling microbiota with L. reuteri administration in Treg-deficient scurfy mice67 and in EAE mice21. Similarly, the oral administration of 17 Clostridia strains to adult mice provided bacterial antigens and a TGF-β-rich environment that helped Treg cells expansion and differentiation and attenuated other experimental diseases, as colitis and allergic diarrhea68. The induction of Treg by Clostridia has been attributed to signals delivered by CD103+ DC to drive naïve CD4+ T cells to differentiate into Treg cells69. At genus level, only supplementation with S. cerevisiae increased Lactobacillus and reduced Turicibacter. Despite this, both supplements significantly increased Firmicutes phylum and families of this phylum, and, as mentioned above, members of these families have been related to the regulation of inflammation.
Having in mind that MLN are a pivotal site in intestinal immunity70, that DC traffic from the intestine to these lymph nodes71, and that Th1 cells migrate to the gut contributing to the inflammatory environment that favours Th17 differentiation during EAE development72, we evaluated the effect of supplementation on the intestinal inflammatory condition. The histopathological analysis revealed that the intestinal inflammation degree was lower in supplemented animals being this effect more evident in the EAE/Selemax group. This finding was reinforced by other assays performed with gut explants that showed lower levels of proinflammatory gene expression and of cytokine production in supplemented EAE mice. Some of these parameters, as IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, Tbx21, Rorc, and Gata3 were more downmodulated in EAE/Selemax mice than in EAE/S. cerevisiae ones. The decreased expression of toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 in both supplemented groups seems meaningful. Considering that the expression of Tlr4 is low at the small intestine in a steady-state condition73, we believe that most of its elevated expression in EAE mice could be due to the presence of inflammatory cells, mainly CD4+ T lymphocytes and γδT cells. This possibility is supported by data that indicates a T cell homing stage during EAE development33,72. In the EAE model, the absence of TLR4 solely in CD4+ T cells significantly decreased disease signs; the authors also found that Tlr4-/- γδT cells presented defective IFN-γ and IL-17 production74. In addition to the reduction of innate and adaptive components of the immune system, Selemax also increased the fold change of Foxp3 and Ido mRNA expression in the small intestine. This seems interesting because it has been shown that encephalitogenic cells migrating into the gut-associated lymphoid tissue can be restrained there, expelled into gut lumen and even transformed into Treg which are effective against CNS autoimmunity75,76. CNS and gut are connected via the gut–brain axis with bidirectional interactions between the CNS and the gastrointestinal tract, including microbial community77,78. These bidirectional interactions enable the brain to influence gastrointestinal functions as well as the immune functions through the cross-talk amongst the gut, the nervous system, and the immune system79.
In summary, S. cerevisiae increased Lactobacilaceae whereas selenium-enriched yeast (Selemax) increased Clostridiaceae and both supplements increased Treg proportion in MLN and controlled EAE development. However, the prevalence of the disease was lower in Selemax supplemented group and only these mice showed a higher PD-L1 expression on CD103+ DC in MLN and a significant reduction of IL-17A in the CNS and IL-17A and Rorc in the small intestine. In this context, Selemax supplementation seems to be a formulation worthwhile to be considered for MS therapy once it is endowed with modulatory properties towards the microbiota and the immune system. It is important to mention, however, that Se status can be affected by several factors, including genetic variation. This polymorphism affects mainly the selenoproteins involved in its metabolism80. These genetic differences must be checked and considered in any preventive or therapeutic measure involving supplementation with Selemax or other organic Se sources.
Altogether our results show that selenization of S. cerevisiae improved its ability to control EAE development. These data also suggest that a significant part of this protective effect seems to occur at the intestinal level, including the generation of a tolerogenic scenario at the MLN and small intestine and modifications of the gut microbiota. In this context, this selenized yeast is a strong candidate to be trialed, in the future, as a CAM in MS patients.
Methods
Experimental design
C57BL/6 mice were allocated into six experimental groups: control (CTL)—healthy animals (n = 6); S. cerevisiae—healthy animals daily supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (n = 8); Selemax—healthy animals daily supplemented with selenized S. cerevisiae (n = 8); experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)—animals immunized with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide (MOG35-55) to develop encephalomyelitis (n = 16); EAE/ S. cerevisiae—immunized with MOG and daily supplemented with S. cerevisiae (n = 18), and EAE/Selemax—immunized with MOG and daily supplemented with selenized S. cerevisiae (n = 21). Four independent experiments were combined. Supplementation was orally delivered by gavage for 14 days, once a day. CTL and EAE groups received the diluent in the same conditions. Body weight and clinical score were evaluated daily for 15 days. On the 15th day, that corresponded to the acute phase of EAE, fresh faecal samples were collected for metagenomic sequencing. The animals were then euthanized with an overdose of ketamine–xylazine and blood samples were collected through cardiac puncture. Mice were then perfused intracardially with sterile Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) before samples collection. Lumbar spinal cord was used for histopathological analysis and real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and brain plus cervical and thoracic spinal cord eluted cells were cultured to assess cytokine production. Spleen cells were cultured to analyze peripheral cytokine production and inguinal lymph node cells were used to evaluate T cell subsets by flow cytometry. T and dendritic cell subsets present in mesenteric lymph nodes were also analyzed by flow cytometry. Pieces (4–5 mm) of small intestine (jejunum and ileum) were freshly used for cultures to assess cytokine production, fixed for histopathological analysis or frozen for further PCR assays. The experimental design is summarized in Fig. 1 and in Supplementary Table 1.
Animals
Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from a specific pathogen-free facility at the University of São Paulo (USP) (Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil). The mice were housed (4 mice/cage) in a ventilated rack system (Alesco, Monte Mor, SP, Brazil) in the animal facility of the Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) (Botucatu, SP, Brazil). Animals received sterilized maintenance diet (AIN-93 M)81 and water ad libitum. All protocols involving mice followed the guidelines of National Council to Control Animal Experimentation (CONCEA, Brazil) and were approved by the local Committee on Ethics in the Use of Animals (CEUA – protocol number 1033/2017), (Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu, SP, Brazil).
EAE induction and evaluation
Eight-week-old mice were subcutaneously immunized, into the lower back, with 100 μg of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide (MOG35–55 – MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK) (Genemed Synthesis Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA) emulsified in 25 μL of complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 2 mg/mL of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). Immediately and 48 h after immunization, the animals were intraperitoneally injected with 200 ng of Bordetella pertussis toxin (Sigma-Aldrich). Clinical scores were assessed daily for 15 days according to the following criteria82,83: no signs (0); limp tail (1); hind legs weakness (2); partially paralyzed hind legs (3); complete hind legs paralysis (4); and complete paralysis or death (5). Body weight loss was calculated considering the difference between the initial weight (at the time of EAE induction—day 0) and the one at the acute disease phase (day 15).
Supplementation with S. cerevisiae and Selemax
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (YSC 11,111) and Selemax, a selenium-enriched S. cerevisiae-YSC111, were provided by Biorigin (Zilor, Lençóis Paulista, SP, Brazil). Selemax production was performed according to Oraby et al.39. Both supplements were diluted in sterile water and administered once a day to the animals by gavage for 14 days. The daily dose of both supplements was 21.34 mg. In the case of Selemax this dose contained 50 µg of Se that, according to Vieira et al.84, was therapeutically effective in experimental arthritis. The composition of both supplements is described in Table 2.
Table 2.
S. cerevisiae | Selemax | |
---|---|---|
Glucans | 12.5% | 12.3% |
Mannan | 14.8% | 15.1% |
Selenium | – | 2343 mg/kg* |
*2343 mg of selenium per kg of S. cerevisiae.
Histopathology
Lumbar spinal cord and small intestine (jejunum and ileum) samples were aseptically removed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissues were dehydrated in graded ethanol, diaphanized in xylol and embedded in Paraplast Plus (McCormick, St. Louis, MO, USA). Paraffin slides with 4 µm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or stained with Luxol Fast Blue (LFB) to assess the inflammatory process and demyelination, respectively. Three photomicrographs were obtained from each animal with Olympus BX60 microscope.
Serum dosages
Total selenium in blood serum was carried out using a quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-QMS, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and77 Se as the isotope of choice. Concentrations of urea, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase serum levels were quantified with Bioclin commercial kits (Quibasa Química Básica Ltda., Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil) and results were measured by Cobas Mira Plus Chemistry Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
Splenocyte culture
Spleens were dissociated with sterile pestles and the red blood cells lysed with 1 mL of ammonium chloride buffer at room temperature for 5 min. The remaining cells were washed with RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) medium and then adjusted to 5 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, United States), 2 mM of l-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma-Aldrich). Spleen cell suspensions were distributed in 48-well plate, stimulated with MOG35-55 (20 µg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. After 48 h incubation, supernatants were stored at − 20 °C for further cytokine quantification.
CNS cell cultures
Brain and spinal cord were collected and digested with 2.5 mg/mL of collagenase D (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and 100 μg/mL of DNAse (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 45 min. The digested tissue homogenate was gently pressed through a 70-µm cell strainer and washed with 5 mL of Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) at 18 °C, 450 × g for 7 min (centrifuge 5810R, Eppendorf AG, Germany). Tissue homogenates were resuspended in 10 mL of Percoll (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) 30% and gently laid over 3 mL of Percoll 70%. After centrifugation at 18 °C, 950 × g for 20 min with centrifuge breaks turned off, the ring containing mononuclear cells was collected and washed twice with HBSS at 18 °C, 450 × g for 7 min. Cells were adjusted to 5 × 105 cells in 0.5 mL of RPMI medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco, United States), 4 mM of L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% of sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% of nonessential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma-Aldrich). CNS cells were distributed in 24-well plate, stimulated with MOG35-55 (50 µg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. After 48 h incubation, supernatants were stored at -20 °C for cytokine quantification.
Gut explant immersion cultures
Cytokine production by immune cells from lamina propria was checked by using gut explant immersion cultures which were done with small fragments from jejunum and ileum. This approach was adapted from Bareiss et al.85 and Randall et al.86. Briefly, the entire jejunum and ileum were aseptically removed and placed in sterile Petri dishes with cold HBSS containing 1% of antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma-Aldrich). The cleaned sections (4 -5 mm), devoid of faeces and Peyer's patches, were sectioned longitudinally to expose the mucosal surface and placed in a 48-well plate. Each well contained two explants immersed in 0.5 ml of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco, United States), 4 mM of l-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% of sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% of nonessential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2% antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma-Aldrich). The cultures were incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for up to 6 h after which the supernatants were stored at − 20 °C for further cytokine quantification.
RT-qPCR analysis
RNA from lumbar spinal cord and fragments of the small intestine (jejunum and ileum) were extracted with TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, United States). For cDNA synthesis, 1000 ng of RNA was converted to cDNA using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life Technologies) following manufacturer’s instructions. Expression of TAU (Mm00521988_m1), Tbx21 (Mm00450960_m1), Rorc (Mm01261022_m1), Foxp3 (Mm00475162_m1), Tgf (Mm01178820 m1), Clec7 (Mm01183349_m1), Tlr2 (Mm00442346_m1), Tlr4 (Mm00445273_m1) and Ido (Mm00492590 m1) target genes was analyzed and normalized in comparison to the reference gene GAPDH (Mm99999915_m1), which show similar expression among groups. Real Time PCR was performed using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) according to manufacturer’s instructions in ABI 7300 equipment (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed in SDS Software System 7300 and mRNA relative expression was determined using the equation 2 − ΔΔCt87. This equation is based on the difference in the cycle threshold (ΔCt) for target and reference genes, divided by the Ct for the calibrator (ΔΔCt); considering the mean of control (non-EAE and non-supplemented mice) group as the calibrator.
Cytokine quantification
Cytokine production by the spleen and CNS cell cultures was evaluated by cytometric bead array (CBA) in supernatants using Mouse Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Data acquisition was performed using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) from Institute of Biosciences (UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil) and the data were analyzed with FCAP Array 3.0 (Soft Flow Inc., St. Louis Park, MN, USA). Cytokine production by gut explant immersion cultures was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using Mouse DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Flow cytometry
The percentage of regulatory T (CD3+CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) and DC (CD11c+MHCIIHigh) were evaluated in total cells from the MLN by flow cytometry. Samples were incubated with PerCP-Cy5.5 labelled anti-mouse CD3 (clone 145-2C11), PE-Cy7 labelled anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5) and APC labelled anti-mouse CD25 (clone PC61.5) for T cell subsets panel or with PerCP-Cy5.5 labelled anti-mouse CD11b (clone M1/70), APC-Cy7 labelled anti-mouse CD11c (clone N418), APC labelled anti-mouse MHCII (clone M5/114.15.2), PE labelled anti-mouse CD103 (clone 2E7) and PE-Cy7 anti-mouse PD-L1 (clone MIH5) for DC panel during 30 min at 4 °C. Intracellular Foxp3 transcription factor was detected using anti-mouse/rat Foxp3 Staining Set PE (FJK-16s) (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. After staining, the cells were washed, resuspended in flow cytometry buffer and fixed in paraformaldehyde 1%. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) from Institute of Biosciences (UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil), the compensation of acquisition data was performed using OneComp eBeads Compensation Beads (eBiosciences) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (BD Biosciences). Gating strategy for T cell and DC subsets was showed in Supplementary Fig. 2.
Microbiota analysis
Faecal DNA was extracted with ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Each DNA sample was subsequently used for 16S amplification using appropriate negative (UltraClean DNA-free PCR water; MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and positive (ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standards, Zymo Research) controls. Metagenomic DNA was amplified using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene that was amplified with region-specific primers that included the Illumina flowcell adapter sequences. The reverse amplification primer also contained a twelve-base barcode sequence that supports pooling of different samples for Illumina sequencing. After cluster formation, the amplicons were sequenced with custom primers. These sequencing primers were designed to be complementary to the V4 amplification primers to avoid sequencing of the primers, and the barcode was read using a third sequencing primer in an additional cycle. Amplification primers (forward GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and reverse GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) were adapted from Caporaso et al.88 protocol to include nine extra bases in the adapter region of the forward amplification primer that supported paired-end sequencing. Libraries were normalized and pooled to 4 nM based on qPCR values. Pooled samples were denatured and diluted to a final concentration of 10 pM with a 20% PhiX (Illumina) control. Sequencing was performed using the MiSeq Reagent Kit V3 in the Illumina MiSeq System. All 47 samples were multiplexed and sequenced on the MiSeq using 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequencing. Analysis was performed with QIIME2 version 2020.289. Briefly, low quality sequences and chimeras were discarded with DADA2 pipeline with standard parameters. Alfa rarefaction and beta diversity were performed with a sampling of 100,000 reads from each sample. Taxonomy was assigned in QIIME against the GreenGenes ribosomal RNA gene database (GreenGenes 13_8 99% OTUs from 515F/806R region).
Statistical analysis
With the exception of the microbiota, normality of data was analyzed by Shapiro–Wilk test and significant outliers were determined by Grubbs' test. Comparisons between three groups were made by One-Way ANOVA or Two-Way ANOVA multiple comparisons followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test and the disease prevalence was analyzed by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Data analysis and figures were made in GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California, United States) and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) tests of the gut microbiota on the unweighted UniFrac distances. Alpha diversity indices were calculated using PAST 3.26 software (https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/PAST.shtml).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP—Grant 2016/23,317–8) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—Grant 307269/2017-5). EJV was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council VR Grant 2018-02533, Cancerfonden (19 0395 Pj) and Wallenberg Academy Fellow (WAF) program. TFCF-S was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), associated to the Graduate Program in Tropical Diseases, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil.
Author contributions
T.F.C.F.-S., C.A.F.O., S.F.G.Z.-P. and A.S. conceived and designed the experiments. T.F.C.F.-S., L.A.N.M., L.R.C.O., J.H.S.T., P.A.B. and S.F.G.Z.-P. performed the EAE-mice experiments, ELISA assays and RT-qPCR analysis tools. T.F.C.F.-S. and L.R.C.O. contributed to flow cytometry. T.F.C.F.-S., L.A.N.M., D.M.F. and E.J.V. contributed to gut and histopathological analysis tools. T.F.C.F.-S., D.P.A. and P.E.M.R. performed the microbiota analysis tools. T.F.C.F.-S. and A.S. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-79102-7.
References
- 1.Wootla B, Eriguchi M, Rodriguez M. Is multiple sclerosis an autoimmune disease? Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/969657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Legroux L, Arbour N. Multiple sclerosis and T lymphocytes: an entangled story T lymphocytes: key cells of the adaptive immune responses. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016;10:528–546. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9614-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Robinson, A. P., Harp, C. T., Noronha, A. & Miller, S. D. NIH Public Access. 173–189 (2014) 10.1016/B978-0-444-52001-2.00008-X.The.
- 4.Gajofatto A, Benedetti MD. Treatment strategies for multiple sclerosis: when to start, when to change, when to stop? World J. Clin. Cases. 2015;2015(3):545–556. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i7.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dendrou CA, Fugger L. Previews please mind the gap: axonal transport deficits in multiple sclerosis neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2014;84:1105–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanasescu, R., Ionete, C. & Constantinescu, C. S. Advances in the Treatment of Relapsing—Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Alonso R, et al. Changes in the multiple sclerosis treatment paradigm. What do we do now and what were we doing before? J. Clin. Neurol. 2018;14(4):487–491. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wingerchuk DM, Carter JL. Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014;89:225–240. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rommer PS, Zettl UK. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy managing the side effects of multiple sclerosis therapy: pharmacotherapy options for patients. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2018;00:1–16. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1446944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yadav, V. et al. Summary of evidence-based guideline: complementary and alternative medicine in multiple sclerosis Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. 1083–1092 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Claflin SB, Van Der Mei IAF, Taylor BV. Complementary and alternative treatments of multiple sclerosis: a review of the evidence from 2001 to 2016. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2017;89:34–41. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilmot VA, Swank RL. The influence of low-fat diet on blood lipid levels in health and in multiple sclerosis. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1952;223:25–34. doi: 10.1097/00000441-195201000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Swank RL. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with low-fat diet. AMA Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry. 1953;69:91–103. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1953.02320250097011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chenard CA, Rubenstein LM, Snetselaar LG, Wahls TL. Nutrient composition comparison between the low saturated fat swank diet for multiple sclerosis and healthy U.S.-style eating pattern. Nutrients. 2019;11:616. doi: 10.3390/nu11030616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leong EM, et al. Complementary and alternative medicines and dietary interventions in multiple sclerosis: what is being used in South Australia and why? Complement Ther. Med. 2009;17:216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beckett JM, Bird M, Pittaway JK, Ahuja KDK. Diet and multiple sclerosis: scoping review of web-based recommendations. Interact. J. Med. Res. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.2196/10050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kirby TO. The Gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis: a potential therapeutic avenue. J. Med. Sci. 2018 doi: 10.3390/medsci6030069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Riccio P, Rossano R. Diet, gut microbiota, and vitamins D + A in multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:75–91. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0581-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gagliardi A, et al. Rebuilding the Gut microbiota ecosystem. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Takata K, et al. Dietary yeasts reduce inflammation in central nerve system via microflora. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2015;2:56–66. doi: 10.1002/acn3.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.He B, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri reduces the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice by modulating gut microbiota. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pericolini E, et al. Therapeutic activity of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based probiotic and inactivated whole yeast on vaginal candidiasis. Virulence. 2017;8:74–90. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1213937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Roussel C, et al. Anti-infectious properties of the probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 on enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) strain H10407. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;102:6175–6189. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9053-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pan X, Chen F, Wu T, Tang H, Zhao Z. Prebiotic oligosaccharides change the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids and the microbial population of mouse bowel. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2009;10:258–263. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miest JJ, Arndt C, Adamek M, Steinhagen D, Reusch TBH. Dietary β-glucan (MacroGard) enhances survival of first feeding turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) larvae by altering immunity, metabolism and microbiota. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;48:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li H, et al. Low dose zymosan ameliorates both chronic and relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013;254:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duntas LH, Benvenga S. Selenium: an element for life. Endocrine. 2015;48:756–775. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0477-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Soni C, et al. Selenium supplementation suppresses immunological and serological features of lupus in B6.Sle1b mice. Autoimmunity. 2019;52:57–68. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2019.1603297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhai Q, et al. Effects of dietary selenium supplementation on intestinal barrier and immune responses associated with its modulation of gut microbiota. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018;5:724–730. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cording S, et al. The intestinal micro-environment imprints stromal cells to promote efficient treg induction in gut-draining lymph nodes. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:359–368. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Randolph GJ, Ivanov S, Zinselmeyer BH, Scallan JP. The lymphatic system: integral roles in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017;35:31–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ducray HAG, et al. Yeast fermentate prebiotic improves intestinal barrier integrity during heat stress by modulation of the gut microbiota in rats. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019;127:1192–1206. doi: 10.1111/jam.14361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Duc D, et al. disrupting myelin-specific Th17 cell gut homing confers protection in an adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Cell Rep. 2019;29:378–390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tofalo R, et al. The life and times of yeasts in traditional food fermentations. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;0:1–30. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1677553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nandy SK, Srivastava RK. A review on sustainable yeast biotechnological processes and applications. Microbiol. Res. 2018;207:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Srivastava RK. Yeast species mediated bioprocesses and bio-products for biotechnological application. J. Biotechnol. Biomed. Sci. 2019;2:1–11. doi: 10.14302/issn.2576-6694.jbbs-19-2684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gaensly F, Wille GMFC, Brand D, Bonfim TMB. Iron enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae maintains its fermenting power and bakery properties. Ciência Tecnol. Aliment. 2011;31:980–983. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612011000400025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Suhajda A, Janzs B, Pais I, Vereczkey G. Trace elements preparation of selenium yeasts I. Preparation of selenium-enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prep. Se Yeast. 2000;14:43–47. doi: 10.1016/S0946-672X(00)80022-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oraby MM, Allababidy T, Ramadan EM. The bioavailability of selenium in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2015;60:307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Porto BAA, et al. Treatment with selenium-enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae UFMG A-905 partially ameliorates mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in mice. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2019;84:117–126. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03865-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cardoso BR, Roberts BR, Bush AI, Hare DJ. Selenium, selenoproteins and neurodegenerative diseases. Metallomics. 2015;7:1213–1228. doi: 10.1039/C5MT00075K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Socha K, et al. Dietary habits and selenium, glutathione peroxidase and total antioxidant status in the serum of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Nutr. J. 2014;13:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Korpela H, Kinnunen E, Juntunen J, Kumpulainen J, Koskenvuo M. Serum selenium concentration, glutathione peroxidase activity and lipid peroxides in a co-twin control study on multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 1989;91:79–84. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(89)90077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Alizadeh A, et al. Comparison of serum Concentration of Se, Pb, Mg, Cu, Zn, between MS patients and healthy controls. Electron. Phys. 2016;8:2759–2764. doi: 10.19082/2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pîrşcoveanu DFV, et al. Tau protein in neurodegenerative diseases—a review. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2017;58:1141–1150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Weinger JG, et al. Mice devoid of tau have increased susceptibility to neuronal damage in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2012;71:422–433. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182540d2e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jaworski J, Psujek M, Janczarek M, Szczerbo-Trojanowska M, Bartosik-Psujek H. Total-tau in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis decreases in secondary progressive stage of disease and reflects degree of brain atrophy. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 2012;117:284–292. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.669423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kosehasanogullari G, Ozakbas S, Idiman E. Tau protein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of the patients with multiple sclerosis in an attack period: Low levels of tau protein may have significance, too. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2015;136:107–109. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Luo J, et al. Glia-dependent TGF-β signaling, acting independently of the TH17 pathway, is critical for initiation of murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:3306–3315. doi: 10.1172/JCI31763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Danikowski KM, Jayaraman S, Prabhakar BS. Regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017;14:13–17. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0892-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Baecher-Allan C, Kaskow BJ, Weiner HL. Multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and immunotherapy. Neuron. 2018;97:742–768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sage PT, et al. Dendritic cell PD-L1 limits autoimmunity and follicular T cell differentiation and function. J. Immunol. 2018;200:2592–2602. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shiokawa A, Kotaki R, Takano T, Nakajima-Adachi H, Hachimura S. Mesenteric lymph node CD11b− CD103+ PD-L1 High dendritic cells highly induce regulatory T cells. Immunology. 2017;152:52–64. doi: 10.1111/imm.12747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Xue H, et al. Selenium upregulates CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells in iodine-induced autoimmune thyroiditis model of. Endocr. J. 2010;57:595–601. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K10E-063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nettleford SK, Prabhu KS. Selenium and selenoproteins in gut inflammation—a review. Antioxidants. 2018;7:1–12. doi: 10.3390/antiox7030036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sonnenburg ED, et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature16504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kriss M, Hazleton KZ, Nusbacher NM, Martin CG, Lozupone CA. Low diversity gut microbiota dysbiosis: drivers, functional implications and recovery. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018;44:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bello MGD, Knight R, Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ. Preserving microbial diversity. Science. 2018;362:33–34. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489:220–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jangi S, et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shahi SK, Freedman SN, Mangalam AK. Gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis: the players involved and the roles they play. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:607–615. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1349041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chu F, et al. Gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: current applications and future perspectives. Mediators Inflamm. 2018;2018:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2018/8168717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Freedman SN, Shahi SK, Mangalam AK. The, “gut feeling”: breaking down the role of gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:109–125. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0588-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gandy KAO, Zhang J, Nagarkatti P, Nagarkatti M. The role of gut microbiota in shaping the relapse-remitting and chronic-progressive forms of multiple sclerosis in mouse models. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43356-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hakansson A, Molin G. Gut microbiota and inflammation. Nutrients. 2011;3:637–687. doi: 10.3390/nu3060637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang K, et al. Lactobacillus casei regulates differentiation of th17/treg cells to reduce intestinal inflammation in mice. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2017;81:122–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.He B, Hoang TK, Tran DQ, Rhoads JM, Liu Y. Adenosine A2A receptor deletion blocks the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus reuteri in regulatory T-Deficient scurfy mice. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:2–10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Atarashi K, et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature. 2013;500:232–236. doi: 10.1038/nature12331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nagano Y, Itoh K, Honda K. The induction of Treg cells by gut-indigenous Clostridium. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012;24:392–397. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Macpherson AJ, Smith K. Mesenteric lymph nodes at the center of immune anatomy. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:497–500. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kobayashi H, et al. In situ demonstration of dendritic cell migration from rat intestine to mesenteric lymph nodes: relationships to maturation and role of chemokines. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004;75:434–442. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nouri M, Bredberg A, Weström B, Lavasani S. Intestinal barrier dysfunction develops at the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and can be induced by adoptive transfer of auto-reactive T cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Price AE, et al. A map of toll-like receptor expression in the intestinal epithelium reveals distinct spatial, cell type-specific, and temporal patterns. Immunity. 2018;49:560–575.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Reynolds JM, Martinez GJ, Chung Y, Dong C. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in T cells promotes autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012;109:13064–13069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120585109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Esplugues E, et al. Control of TH17 cells occurs in the small intestine. Nature. 2011;475:514–518. doi: 10.1038/nature10228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Berer K, Krishnamoorthy G. Microbial view of central nervous system autoimmunity. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:4207–4213. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009;6:306–314. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Montiel-Castro AJ, Gonzalez-Cervantes RM, Bravo-Ruiseco G, Pacheco-Lopez G. The microbiota-gut-brain axis: Neurobehavioral correlates, health and sociality. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2013;7:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Marietta E, Horwath I, Taneja V. Microbiome, immunomodulation, and the neuronal system. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:23–30. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0601-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kopp TI, Outzen M, Olsen A, Vogel U, Ravn-Haren G. Genetic polymorphism in selenoprotein P modifies the response to selenium-rich foods on blood levels of selenium and selenoprotein P in a randomized dietary intervention study in Danes. Genes Nutr. 2018;13:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12263-018-0608-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J. Nutr. 1993;123:1939–1951. doi: 10.1093/jn/123.11.1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Brocke S, Gijbels K, Steinman L. Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in the Mouse. INC., New York: Autoimmune Disease Models (ACADEMIC PRESS; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fraga-Silva TFC, et al. Tolerogenic vaccination with MOG/VitD overcomes aggravating effect of C. albicans in experimental encephalomyelitis. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2016;22:807–816. doi: 10.1111/cns.12572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Vieira AT, et al. Treatment with Selemax, a selenium-enriched yeast, ameliorates experimental arthritis in rats and mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2012;108:1829–1838. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512000013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bareiss PM, et al. Organotypical tissue cultures from adult murine colon as an in vitro model of intestinal mucosa. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008;129:795–804. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0405-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Randall KJ, Turton J, Foster JR. Explant culture of gastrointestinal tissue: a review of methods and applications. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2011;27:267–284. doi: 10.1007/s10565-011-9187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bolyen E, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.