Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Dec 17;7(2):304–306. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6778

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Patients Undergoing Active Antitumor Treatment in Italy

Carlo Aschele 1,, Maria Emanuela Negru 1, Alessandro Pastorino 1, Luigi Cavanna 2, Vittorina Zagonel 3, Francesco Barone-Adesi 4,5, Livio Blasi 6
PMCID: PMC7747030  PMID: 33331862

Abstract

This cohort study examines rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with cancer receiving antitumor treatment.


The interactions between cancer and susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are poorly understood. Early reports suggested a higher COVID-19 risk in patients with cancer not specifically selected for recent anticancer treatment,1,2 but data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission among patients undergoing antitumor treatment are lacking.

Methods

To calculate the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients receiving antitumor treatment, data on patients treated at 118 Medical Oncology Units affiliated with the Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri (CIPOMO)3 were collected in a retroprospective study (CIPOMO-ONCO-COVID-19).

For each center, aggregate data were registered on all patients who received at least 1 course of an active anticancer treatment between January 15 and May 4, 2020. Individual data were collected for those developing COVID-19 as assessed through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test from a nasopharyngeal swab (driven by either symptoms or contact with a known positive case). Results were compared with those reported for the general Italian population over the same time period.4 This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute of Infectious Diseases with informed consent waiver for critically ill patients because all data were deidentified.

Results

Of 59 989 patients receiving antitumor treatment between January 15, 2020, and May 4, 2020, 406 developed COVID-19 with a positive nasopharyngeal PCR test result (0.68%; 95% CI, 0.61%-0.75%).

The median (range) age of infected patients was 68 (28-89) years. Most were symptomatic (n = 339, 83%), and 314 (77%) required hospitalization. Lung cancer was the most common tumor (n = 91, 22%), and chemotherapy the most represented antitumor treatment (n = 252, 62%) (Table 1). The infection rate was higher compared with the general Italian population during the same time period and varied between different geographical areas (Table 24).

Table 1. Characteristics of the Studied Population Stratified by SARS-CoV-2 Development.

Characteristic No. (%)
Total population of patients receiving active antitumor treatment
(January 15-May 4, 2020)
Patients developing SARS-CoV-2 infection Patients not developing SARS-CoV-2 infection
No. 59 989 406 (0.68) 59 583 (99.32)
Age, median (range), y 65 (20-97) 68 (28-89) 65
Female 31 876 (53.2) 184 (45.3) 31 692 (53.2)
Male 25 878 (43.1) 219 (53.9) 25 659 (43.1)
Unknown 2235 (3.7) 3 (0.7) 2232 (3.7)
Cancer type
Lung 5460 (9.1) 91 (22.4) 5369 (9)
Breast 10 321 (17.2) 75 (18.5) 10 246 (17.2)
Colorectal 6141 (10.2) 38 (9.4) 6103 (10.3)
Prostate 2735 (4.6) 35 (8.6) 2700 (4.5)
Other 12 826 (21.4) 164 (40.4) 12 662 (21.3)
Gynecologic NS 19 (4.7) NS
Urothelial NS 15 (3.7) NS
Hematologic NS 24 (5.9) NS
Upper GI (gastric, biliary, pancreatic) NS 42 (10.3) NS
Melanoma and skin NS 11 (2.7) NS
Kidney NS 9 (2.2) NS
Soft tissue sarcoma NS 17 (4.2) NS
Others types of tumor NS 27 (6.7) NS
Unknown 22 506 (37.5) 3 (0.7) 22 503 (37.5)
Antineoplastic therapy
Chemotherapy +/– biologics 20 895 (34.8) 244 (60.1) 20 651 (34.7)
Chemo-immunotherapy 1099 (1.8) 8 (2) 1091 (1.8)
Immunotherapy 4327 (7.2) 41 (10.1) 4286 (7.2)
Targeted 5974 (10) 74 (18.2) 5900 (9.9)
Others 3881 (6.5) 36 (8.9) 3845 (6)
Hormone NA 34 (8.4) NA
Other types of treatment NA 2 (0.5) NA
Unknown 23 813 (39.7) 3 (0.7) 23 810 (40)
Clinical presentation
Symptomatic NA 339 (83.4) NA
Asymptomatic (contact with a known positive case) NA 63 (15.6) NA
Unknown NA 4 (1) NA
Hospitalization
Yes NA 314 (77.3) NA
No NA 87 (21.4) NA
Unknown NA 5 (1.2) NA

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; NS, not specified; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Table 2. Rates of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Patients Undergoing Antineoplastic Treatment in 118 Medical Oncology Units Compared With the General Italian Population by May 4, 2020.

Variable Patients receiving antitumor treatment General populationa, infection rates % RR (95% CI)
SARS-CoV-2 positive cases/total patients receiving antitumor treatment Infection rates % (95% CI)
Italy (whole country) 406/59 989 0.68 (0.61-0.75) 0.39 1.42 (1.29-1.56)b
Northern Italy 355/36 996 0.96 (0.86-1.06) 0.68 1.40 (1.26-1.55)
Central Italy 35/10 896 0.32 (0.22-0.45) 0.22 1.47 (1.0-2.04)
Southern Italy and islands 16/12 097 0.13 (0.08-0.21) 0.08 1.65 (0.94-2.68)

Abbreviations: RR, relative risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients receiving antitumor treatment compared to the general Italian population; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

a

Rates of infection in the general population were derived from reports of the Italian Istituto Superiore della Sanità.4

b

Results adjusted by geographical area.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study represents the largest investigation on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer and the first to focus specifically on patients receiving antitumor treatment. The 0.68% rate of infection that we found is low compared with the benefits achievable with most oncologic treatments. Notably, the infection rate remained below 1% even in the area with the greatest COVID-19 spread, partly reflecting reorganization measures implemented in medical oncology units in Italy at the onset of this outbreak.3

Our estimates should be regarded as conservative because this was not a screening study and could not capture asymptomatic patients without a known contact. Patients receiving antitumor treatment, however, are frequently visited in an oncologic day hospital with lower thresholds for testing. Underestimation is thus unlikely compared with incidences reported in the community. On the other hand, the strict definition of positive cases (PCR test) minimizes overestimation errors compared with previous reports.2

Compared with the general Italian population, patients receiving antineoplastic treatment appeared to have a higher risk of developing COVID-19 (Table 2). Rather than reflecting a higher biologic susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, this could depend on the different age distribution of the 2 groups, with patients with cancer being on average older than the general population, and on a higher likelihood of viral exposure for patients owing to multiple and continued hospital visits. The lower rates of infection among patients with cancer in areas with lower degrees of COVID-19 spread seems to be consistent with this hypothesis (Table 2).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this study provides the first estimate of the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients receiving antitumor treatment on a large population of approximately 60 000 patients treated at more than 110 oncology units. From a clinical point of view, the low probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection among these patients (<1%) supports the continuation of most oncologic treatments in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Based on the present data, delaying active antitumor treatment to avoid SARS-CoV-2 transmission should not be routinely recommended.

References


Articles from JAMA Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES