Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
. 2020 Dec 16;12:1759720X20969261. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20969261

Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis

Arthur Petitdemange 1, Julien Blaess 2, Jean Sibilia 3, Renaud Felten 4, Laurent Arnaud 5,✉
PMCID: PMC7747103  PMID: 33403021

Abstract

Background:

Pathogenic inflammatory pathways are largely shared between different autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AIDs). This offers the potential to develop a given targeted therapy in several AIDs.

Methods:

We analyzed two clinical trials registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register) to identify the targeted therapies whose development is shared between at least two of the most common AIDs [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), cutaneous psoriasis (cPso), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), giant cell arteritis (GCA), and multiple sclerosis (MS)] using an in-depth repurposing analysis.

Results:

We identified 142 shared targeted therapies. The four diseases in which shared targeted therapies were the most numerous were RA (n = 92), cPso (n = 67), IBD (n = 58), and SLE (n = 56). The two clusters of diseases between which the overlap of targeted therapies was the most important were RA and SLE as well as RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD. The targeted therapies which were shared by five diseases or more were abatacept, ustekinumab, rituximab, anakinra, etanercept, infliximab, secukinumab, tofacitinib, alemtuzumab, tocilizumab, adalimumab, apremilast, baricitinib, belimumab, brodalumab, filgotinib, and upadacitinib. The most frequently targeted molecules and pathways were (by descending frequency): JAK-STAT pathways, Th17 axis, TNF-α, IL-6, costimulation molecules, BAFF, CD20, BTK, chemokines and integrins, IL-1, and type I interferon.

Conclusion:

Many targeted therapies are developed in several AIDs, reflecting the overlap of pathogenic pathways and potential of drug repurposing. This suggests that a revision of the current, clinically based classification of AIDs towards a more mechanistic-based taxonomy might be relevant.

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, biological products, drug repositioning, investigational, molecular targeted therapy, therapies

Highlights

  • - We analyzed systematically shared drugs and pathways in development between 10 autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AIDs).

  • - The 2 AID clusters sharing the highest number of targeted therapies were RA and SLE as well as RA, SpA, psoriasis, and IBD.

  • - The most common targeted pathways were (by decreasing frequency): JAK-STAT, Th17 axis, TNF-α, IL-6, costimulation molecules, BAFF, CD20, BTK, chemokines and integrins, IL-1, and type I interferon.

Introduction

Pharmacological treatment of inflammatory diseases consists mainly of targeting the dysregulated immune system. For decades, this was achieved through the use of glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. The efficacy of these drugs should be balanced against their potential toxicity, with both the former and the latter being related to their generally pleiotropic action.

Recent decades have seen the advent of targeted therapies that have greatly improved the prognosis of inflammatory diseases.1,2 More targeted action theoretically allows reduced toxicity without precluding significant efficacy. The emergence of targeted therapies has been enabled by the considerable progress in the understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. The discovery that inflammatory pathways are frequently shared between autoimmune diseases,3–5 as highlighted by the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis or inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), enables the practice of drug repurposing (or repositioning), which refers to the use in a disease of a drug that has already been approved for use in another disease.6 This may also lead to a redefinition of inflammatory diseases according to molecular pathways instead of more traditional clinical features.7

In this study, we identified in a systematic manner all targeted therapies for which development is shared by at least two diseases among the most common autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AIDs). We aimed to analyze the concept of drug repurposing and to give an overview of the main molecular pathways targeted in the field of inflammatory diseases. We also sought to isolate clusters of diseases according to molecular and cellular targeted pathways. This may give an insight into advanced repurposing strategies and a future mechanistic-based nosology.

Methods

Selection of auto-immune and inflammatory diseases

The following 10 AIDs were included in the review: RA, spondyloarthritis (SpA) (including non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, peripheral spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis), cutaneous psoriasis (cPso), IBD (including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), giant cell arteritis (GCA) (also including Takayasu arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The chosen diseases were selected because of their significance regarding their epidemiology and burden on public health, and because there is a strong interest in the development of targeted therapies for those diseases.8,9

Extraction of trials and molecules

For each of these diseases, we selected all clinical trials registered with the two most important clinical trials registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register). Duplicates between the two registries were excluded. The search was performed up to 5 October 2019. Using R statistical software, we identified all molecules studied in at least 2 of the 10 predefined diseases. From this list, we retained all targeted therapies, defined as drugs specifically designed to block specific molecules, receptors, or pathways involved in the development of autoimmune diseases. We excluded from this analysis all non-pharmacological interventions, and all pharmacological agents leading to a non-specific blockade of the immune system, such as classical immunosuppressive agents. We considered only the originators of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and excluded biosimilars. Targeted therapies were classified according to their mechanisms of action. For each identified molecule, the most advanced and latest known stage of drug development in each disease was extracted from the registries. The number of targeted therapies shared by a disease with each of the other diseases was calculated.

Statistics

Quantitative variables were described using number and percentages. All interventions studied in at least two of the diseases were identified using R statistical software version 3.6.1, package XLConnect version 0.2–15. Venn diagrams represented in Figure 1 were computed using R software package “VennDiagram” version 1.6.20. The overlaps between molecules (Figure 2) were computed using the R software package “UpSetR” version 1.4.0.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Associations of diseases based on the number of shared targeted therapies.

For each disease, a Venn diagram shows three closely related diseases based on the number of shared targeted therapies. (A) For RA (also valid for SLE). (B) For SpA (also valid for cPso and IBD). (C) For pSS. (D) For SSc. (E) For IIM. (F) For GCA. (G) For MS. Numbers in parentheses represent the number of trials.

cPso, cutaneous psoriasis; GCA, giant cell arteritis; IBD, inflammatory bowel diseases; IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; MS, multiple sclerosis; pSS, primary Sjögren’s syndrome; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SpA, spondyloarthritis; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Number of shared targeted therapies developed in each disease and in the different sets of diseases. The horizontal bars on the left of the figure represent, for each disease, the number of molecules in development shared with one or more of the other diseases. The points connected by lines at the bottom of the figure show all the sets of diseases for which shared drugs exist. Finally, the vertical bars represent the number of molecules shared by each set of disease.

cPso, cutaneous psoriasis; GCA, giant cell arteritis; IBD, inflammatory bowel diseases; IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; MS, multiple sclerosis; PMR, polymyalgia rheumatica; pSS, primary Sjögren’s syndrome; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SpA, spondyloarthritis; SSc, systemic sclerosis; TA, Takayasu arteritis.

Data statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.

Results

Our systematic review identified 142 targeted therapies assessed in at least 2 of the 10 predefined AIDs.

Table 1 shows, for each disease, the number of clinical trials extracted from the two registries and the number of targeted therapies shared with other diseases.

Table 1.

Trials identified and number of shared targeted therapies for each disease.

Diseases Identification of trials Number of shared targeted therapies*
From ClinicalTrials.gov From EU-CTR Duplicates Total number of trials
Rheumatoid arthritis 1642 554 345 1851 92
Spondyloarthritis 453 182 101 534 36
Cutaneous psoriasis 1070 390 193 1267 67
Inflammatory bowel diseases 1369 592 213 1748 58
Systemic lupus erythematosus 456 126 62 520 56
Sjögren’s syndrome 125 31 16 140 22
Systemic Sclerosis 284 63 14 333 18
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies 105 21 11 115 20
Giant cell arteritis 71 26 10 87 15
Multiple sclerosis 1480 412 219 1673 28
Open in a new tab
*

With other diseases from the table.

Shared targeted therapies identified for inflammatory diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis

From a total of 1851 clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis, we identified 92 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with RA were: SLE (n = 41 molecules), IBD (n = 35), and cPso (n = 33) (Figure 1A).

Spondyloarthritis

We identified 534 trials conducted in spondyloarthritis. From these trials, we found 36 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with SpA were: cPso (n = 26), RA (n = 26), and IBD (n = 21) (Figure 1B).

Cutaneous psoriasis

From a total of 1267 trials in cPso, we identified 67 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with cPso were: IBD (n = 33), RA (n = 33), and SpA (n = 26) (Figure1B).

Inflammatory bowel diseases

We identified 1748 trials in IBD. From these trials, we found 58 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with IBD were: RA (n = 35), cPso (n = 33), and SpA (n = 21) (Figure 1B).

Systemic lupus erythematosus

From 520 clinical trials in SLE, we identified 56 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with SLE were: RA (n = 41), cPso (n = 17), and IBD (n = 16) (Figure 1A).

Primary Sjögren’s syndrome

From 140 clinical trials in pSS, we found 22 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with pSS were: RA (n = 16), SLE (n = 14), and IIM (n = 7) (Figure 1C).

Systemic sclerosis

We identified 333 trials conducted in SSc. From these trials, we found 18 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with SSc were: RA (n = 10), SLE (n = 10), and IIM (n = 7) (Figure 1D).

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

From 115 trials in IIM, we identified 20 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with IIM were: SLE (n = 13), RA (n = 12), and cPso (n = 9) (Figure 1E).

Giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, and polymyalgia rheumatica

We identified 87 trials conducted in GCA. From these trials, we found 15 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with GCA were: RA (n = 14), SpA (n = 10), and SLE (n = 9) (Figure 1F).

Multiple sclerosis

We identified 1673 clinical trials in MS. From these trials, we found 28 targeted therapies shared with at least another disease. The three diseases sharing the highest number of molecules under development with MS were: RA (n = 18 molecules), SLE (n = 13), and IBD (n = 12) (Figure 1G).

The complete list of the 142 shared targeted therapies and the diseases in which they are developed, as well as their mechanism of action, is shown in the Supplemental Table S1.

Inflammatory diseases sharing the highest number of targeted therapies

The number of targeted therapies shared by the different sets of diseases is shown in Figure 2. Among the targeted therapies shared by only 2 of the ten diseases, 12 are shared between RA and SLE, 11 between RA and cPso, 10 between cPso and IBD, 10 between RA and IBD, 5 between SpA and cPso, and 4 between RA and MS. Among the targeted therapies shared by three diseases, four are shared between RA, SLE, and pSS, four between RA, SLE, and MS, and three between RA, cPso, and IBD. Among the targeted therapies shared by four diseases, four are shared between RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD and two are shared between SpA, cPso, IBD, and SLE.

Most commonly shared targeted therapies for inflammatory diseases

We identified one targeted therapy investigated in all 10 diseases: abatacept, a fusion protein consisting of CTLA4 and an immunoglobulin chain. Two targeted therapies were assessed in 8 of the 10 diseases: ustekinumab [anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 p40 subunit monoclonal antibody] and rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody). The eight diseases in which ustekinumab was studied are: RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, SLE, IIM, GCA, and MS. The eight diseases in which rituximab was assessed are: RA, SpA, IBD, SLE, pSS, SSc, IIM, and MS. Five targeted therapies was evaluated in 7 of the 10 diseases: anakinra, etanercept (and its biosimilars), infliximab (and its biosimilars), secukinumab, tofacitinib. Anakinra is an IL-1 receptor antagonist investigated in RA, cPso, SLE, pSS, IIM, GCA, and MS. Etanercept is a TNF-α inhibitor tested in RA, SpA, cPso, SLE, pSS, IIM, and GCA. Infliximab, another TNF-α inhibitor, was assessed in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, SLE, IIM, and GCA. Secukinumab is an anti-IL-17 monoclonal antibody evaluated in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, SLE, GCA, and MS. Tofacitinib is a selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK3 inhibitor investigated in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, SLE, SSc, and IIM. We identified two targeted therapies assessed in 6 of the 10 diseases: alemtuzumab and tocilizumab. Alemtuzumab is an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody; it was studied in RA, IBD, SLE, SSc, IIM, and MS. Tocilizumab is an anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody assessed in RA, SpA, pSS, SSc, IIM, and GCA. Seven targeted therapies were studied in 5 of the 10 diseases. Adalimumab (and its biosimilars), apremilast, baricitinib, belimumab, brodalumab, filgotinib, and upadacitinib. Adalimumab, an anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, was investigated in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, and GCA. Apremilast, a type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was evaluated in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, and IIM. Baricitinib is a selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor tested in RA, SpA, cPso, SLE and GCA. Belimumab, an anti-B-cell activating factor (BAFF) monoclonal antibody, was assessed in RA, SLE, pSS, SSc, and IIM. Brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor of IL-17A; it was studied in RA, SpA, cPso, IBD, and SSc. Filgotinib and upadacitinib are selective JAK1 inhibitors both investigated in RA, SpA, IBD, and SLE; filgotinib was also tested in pSS and upadacitinib in GCA.

The latest known development phase and status of the drugs for each of the diseases are shown in Supplemental Table S2.

Most commonly shared molecular pathways targeted in inflammatory diseases

In RA, the pathways most commonly targeted by the shared therapies identified are: Th17 cytokines (through anti-IL-23, anti-IL-22, and anti-IL-17 monoclonal antibodies) (n = 9 molecules), TNF-α (n = 9), Janus kinase-signal transduction and activation of transcription (JAK-STAT) (n = 8), B-cell activating factor (BAFF) (n = 7), IL-6 (n = 7), Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) (n = 6), CD20 (n = 5), costimulation molecules (n = 4), integrins or selectins (n = 4), chemokines (n = 4), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (n = 3), IL-1 (n = 3), and p38 MAPK (n = 3). In SpA, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: Th17 cytokines (n = 11), TNF-α (n = 7), JAK-STAT (n = 6), IL-6 (n = 3), integrins or selectins (n = 2), and costimulation molecules (n = 2). In cPso, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: Th17 cytokines (n = 14), JAK-STAT (n = 8), intracellular kinases (excluding JAK kinases) (n = 7), TNF-α (n = 5), Th1 cytokines (n = 5), costimulation molecules (n = 4), and integrins or selectins (n = 3). In IBD, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: JAK-STAT (n = 9), Th17 cytokines (n = 9), TNF-α (n = 6), chemokines (n = 3), IL-6 (n = 3), and integrins or selectins (n = 2). In SLE, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: costimulation molecules (n = 7), JAK-STAT (n = 7), BAFF (n = 7), CD20 (n = 4), BTK (n = 4), type I interferon (IFN) (n = 4), IL-6 (n = 3), and proteasome (n = 2). In pSS, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: BAFF (n = 5), costimulation molecules (n = 4), and BTK (n = 2). In SSc, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: JAK-STAT (n = 2) and IL-6 (n = 2). In IIM, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: type I IFN (n = 4), TNF-α (n = 2) and IL-1 (n = 2). In GCA, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: TNF-α (n = 3), IL-1 (n = 3), IL-6 (n = 3), Th17 cytokines (n = 2) and JAK-STAT (n = 2). In MS, the most commonly targeted shared pathways are: Th17 cytokines (n = 3), CD20 (n = 3), BAFF (n = 3) and integrins or selectins (n = 3).

Discussion

In this systematic review, we identified all targeted therapies for which development is shared among the main AIDs. As the term “development” covers phase IV post-marketing studies, most drugs being used currently in clinical practice also appear among the identified targeted therapies.

We identified 142 targeted therapies shared among the 10 pre-specified diseases. Among them, 92 molecules (65%) were developed for, or used in, RA. This could reflect the interest in the development of treatments for this disease,10 as well as the existence of pathogenic mechanisms shared with other diseases.4,5 More than one-third of the shared targeted therapies were studied in cPso, IBD, and SLE, which we attribute similarly to the stake represented by the development of new effective molecules in these diseases and to the existence of shared therapeutic targets.11–13 Conversely, very few of the shared targeted therapies were identified in SSc and MS relative to the high number of clinical trials extracted. This is likely due to their particular pathophysiology, SSc involving not only immune system dysfunction but also microvascular changes and fibrosis,14 and MS being an autoimmune disease affecting a single organ enclosed behind the blood-brain barrier.

On the whole, the pathways most frequently targeted by the shared therapies were (in descending frequency of molecules): JAK-STAT pathways, Th17 axis, TNF-α, IL-6, costimulation molecules, B cells (mainly through BAFF and BTK inhibitors and anti-CD20 antibodies), molecules involved in leukocyte chemotaxis (integrins, selectins and chemokines), IL-1, and type I IFN.

We could isolate two clusters of diseases in which the overlap of targeted therapies was particularly important: (1) RA and SLE; and (2) RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD. It should be kept in mind that diseases in which the number of trials (and thereby of studied molecules) is large obviously tend to share more molecules between them. As a result, one could not simply consider the number of shared molecules as the reflection of pathophysiologic and therapeutic relatedness. Nonetheless, this important overlap reflects similarities in the pathways targeted in these diseases. For instance, JAK-STAT, BAFF, BTK, CD20, and costimulation molecules are targeted by several drugs in development in both RA and SLE.

Targeting JAK-STAT pathways is of interest in these two diseases; for example, the inhibition of JAK1 blocks both IL-6 and type I IFN signalling, two cytokines whose role in the pathophysiology of RA and SLE, respectively, is known.15–19 As for the targeting of BAFF, BTK, CD20 and costimulation molecules, it takes advantage of the pathogenic role of B cells and auto-antibodies in RA and SLE.20–25 About the cluster formed by RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD, the main pathways that underlie the overlap of targeted therapies were Th17 cytokines, JAK-STAT, and TNF-α. Many studies have indeed provided evidence for the involvement of the Th17 axis in these four diseases.4,26–31 The development of several JAK inhibitors in RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD was expected, considering the number of cytokines involved in their pathogenesis that signal through the JAK-STAT pathways.32–35 Finally, the role of TNF-α in this cluster is today well-documented, both by experimental data and by the clinical success of TNF-α inhibitors.36–41

Compared with the relatively limited number of clinical trials in pSS and IIM, both diseases shared a proportionally high number of targeted therapies with RA and SLE. The main shared pathways targeted in pSS, RA, and SLE were costimulation molecules and BAFF, reflecting the B cell-mediated nature of Sjögren’s disease, as previously mentioned for RA and SLE.42 The main pathway targeted in both IIM and SLE was type I IFN. This comes from the fact that dermatomyositis (one of the IIM) and SLE are known type I IFN-mediated diseases,3,18,19,43 as proven by the frequent existence of an IFN signature and by the efficacy of anti-IFN therapies in patients affected by SLE or dermatomyositis.44,45 Between IIM and RA, the most shared targeted pathways were TNF-α and IL-1.

Among the 15 targeted therapies that GCA shared with others diseases, 14 were shared with RA. These 14 molecules targeted mainly TNF-α, Th17 cytokines, IL-6, IL-1, and JAK-STAT; cytokines and pathways for which a role in RA and GCA pathogenesis has been established.46

Many of the drugs used currently to treat AIDs result from repurposing, especially from other autoimmune diseases (e.g., TNF inhibitors, most of which were approved in RA and repurposed a few years later in SpA). Identification of candidates for drug repurposing is classically made possible through hypotheses regarding disease pathogenesis.47 Besides, repurposing candidates could arise by observation of off-targets effects and through more modern approaches such as, for example, signature matching (which consists of comparing the transcriptomic signature of a molecule with that of another drug already used in a disease) or molecular docking (a structure-based strategy to predict affinity between a drug and a therapeutic target).6 The mechanistic-based repurposing strategy underlies, probably to a large extent, the overlaps that we identified in this review.

Currently, AIDs are defined mainly on the basis of their clinical characteristics. However, the similarities between different diseases and, conversely, the heterogeneity within a single entity, resulting in the inability to classify some patients should lead to a reclassification of these diseases.7 Thanks to considerable advances in the comprehension of AIDs pathogenesis and because it might determine the best therapeutic choices, the next classification may distinguish different entities on the basis of the predominant mechanism involved in disease pathogenesis. For example, the role of type I IFN in several rheumatic diseases has led to the emergence of the concept of type-I interferon mediated diseases.3 At least, currently defined diseases may be further subdivided according to molecular features (for instance, in RA, we would distinguish predominantly B-cell mediated forms, predominantly TNF-mediated forms, and so on). Thus, the above-mentioned shared molecular targets could be seen as potential candidates for such mechanistic-based classifications.

This study has some limitations. The systematic method for screening clinical trials we used in this systematic review did not allow us to determine whether a study had been completed or not, and whether the primary end-point had been reached. Yet, early termination could reflect a lack of involvement of the studied pathway in the pathogenesis of the disease (beside other reasons such as a lack of power of the study, insufficient efficacy or the involvement of the pathway only in subgroups of patients). The most prominent example is the Th17 pathway that we identified as one of the most frequently targeted by drugs developed in RA. However, no anti-Th17 agent is currently approved in this disease because trials of these therapies have failed to reach their primary end-points in later phase studies. Accordingly, identified drugs should not be strictly interpreted as those effective in each disease. Rather, our results reflect repurposing strategies that rely on mechanistic hypotheses but do not guarantee that good results will be obtained in clinical trials. Finally, our results should be interpreted keeping in mind that the decision to test a given molecule in a disease, although largely dependent on supposed pathophysiology, is also conditioned by marketing considerations such as a lack of effective therapies in a disease or the market-share it may represent. Also, older targeted therapies are more likely to have been tested in more indications than newer ones.

In conclusion, this analysis highlighted the numerous overlaps of targeted therapies that exist between AIDs. The limited number of inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of those diseases enables a high potential for drug repurposing and might explain the identified overlaps. This may also prompt a redefinition of AIDs towards a new nosology based not only upon clinical but also mechanistic features. This might be all the more interesting in the near future, as the identification of the prominent pathophysiology may determine the optimal targeted therapy to be used.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 – Supplemental material for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis
Click here for additional data file. (53.1KB, docx)

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis by Arthur Petitdemange, Julien Blaess, Jean Sibilia, Renaud Felten and Laurent Arnaud in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease

sj-docx-2-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 – Supplemental material for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis
Click here for additional data file. (75.2KB, docx)

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis by Arthur Petitdemange, Julien Blaess, Jean Sibilia, Renaud Felten and Laurent Arnaud in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Sylvie Thuong for her invaluable help in the preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: Arthur PETITDEMANGE: no competing interest.

Julien BLAESS: no competing interest.

Jean SIBILIA has acted as a consultant for Roche, Chugai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB, GSK, LFB, Actelion, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Abbvie, Sandoz, Gilead, Lilly, Sanofi Genzyme, Janssen, Mylan.

Renaud FELTEN has participated to Advisory Boards for AbbVie, Novartis and received invitations or performed interventions for Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB.

Laurent ARNAUD has acted as a consultant for Alexion, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, LFB, Lilly, Menarini France, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugaï, UCB.

Ethics: Ethics approval and informed consent were not required for the present study since it did not involve human participants.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Contributor Information

Arthur Petitdemange, Department of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Auto-Immune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Julien Blaess, Department of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Auto-Immune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Jean Sibilia, Department of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Auto-Immune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Renaud Felten, Department of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Auto-Immune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Laurent Arnaud, Service de rhumatologie, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 1 Avenue Molière BP 83049, Strasbourg Cedex, 67098, France.

References

  • 1. Zhang Y, Lu N, Peloquin C, et al. Improved survival in rheumatoid arthritis: a general population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 408–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tselios K, Gladman DD, Sheane BJ, et al. All-cause, cause-specific and age-specific standardised mortality ratios of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Ontario, Canada over 43 years (1971-2013). Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 802–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Psarras A, Emery P, Vital EM. Type I interferon-mediated autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis, diagnosis and targeted therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56: 1662–1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ruiz de Morales JMG, Puig L, Dauden E, et al. Critical role of interleukin (IL)-17 in inflammatory and immune disorders: an updated review of the evidence focusing in controversies. Autoimmun Rev 2020; 19: 102429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. O’Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity 2012; 36: 542–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, et al. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019; 18: 41–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Barturen G, Beretta L, Cervera R, et al. Moving towards a molecular taxonomy of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 75–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sebbag E, Felten R, Sagez F, et al. The world-wide burden of musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic analysis of the World Health Organization burden of diseases database. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 844–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sarzi-Puttini P, Ceribelli A, Marotto D, et al. Systemic rheumatic diseases: from biological agents to small molecules. Autoimmun Rev 2019; 18: 583–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cheung TT, McInnes IB. Future therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis? Semin Immunopathol 2017; 39: 487–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hawkes JE, Chan TC, Krueger JG. Psoriasis pathogenesis and the development of novel targeted immune therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 140: 645–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Na S-Y, Moon W. Perspectives on current and novel treatments for inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Liver 2019; 13: 604–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Vukelic M, Li Y, Kyttaris VC. Novel treatments in lupus. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 2658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Denton CP. Advances in pathogenesis and treatment of systemic sclerosis. Clin Med (Lond) 2015; 15(Suppl. 6): s58–s63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schwartz DM, Bonelli M, Gadina M, et al. Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016; 12: 25–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Alunno A, Padjen I, Fanouriakis A, et al. Pathogenic and therapeutic relevance of JAK/STAT signaling in systemic lupus erythematosus: integration of distinct inflammatory pathways and the prospect of their inhibition with an oral agent. Cells 2019; 8: 898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Narazaki M, Tanaka T, Kishimoto T. The role and therapeutic targeting of IL-6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2017; 13: 535–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bengtsson AA, Ronnblom L. Role of interferons in SLE. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2017; 31: 415–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Banchereau J, Pascual V. Type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases. Immunity 2006; 25: 383–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Waldman M, Madaio MP. Pathogenic autoantibodies in lupus nephritis. Lupus 2005; 14: 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Youinou P, Jamin C, Saraux A. B-cell: a logical target for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 318–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nakken B, Munthe LA, Konttinen YT, et al. B-cells and their targeting in rheumatoid arthritis–current concepts and future perspectives. Autoimmun Rev 2011; 11: 28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wen J, Stock AD, Chalmers SA, et al. The role of B cells and autoantibodies in neuropsychiatric lupus. Autoimmun Rev 2016; 15: 890–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Derksen V, Huizinga TWJ, van der Woude D. The role of autoantibodies in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunopathol 2017; 39: 437–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yap DYH, Chan TM. B cell abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis-role in pathogenesis and effect of immunosuppressive treatments. Int J Mol Sci. Epub ahead of print 10 December 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang L, Li YG, Li YH, et al. Increased frequencies of Th22 cells as well as Th17 cells in the peripheral blood of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Smith JA, Colbert RA. Review: the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 axis in spondyloarthritis pathogenesis: Th17 and beyond. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66: 231–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Roeleveld DM, Koenders MI. The role of the Th17 cytokines IL-17 and IL-22 in rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis and developments in cytokine immunotherapy. Cytokine 2015; 74: 101–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Blauvelt A, Chiricozzi A. The immunologic role of IL-17 in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pathogenesis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2018; 55: 379–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Holtta V, Klemetti P, Sipponen T, et al. IL-23/IL-17 immunity as a hallmark of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14: 1175–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Jiang W, Su J, Zhang X, et al. Elevated levels of Th17 cells and Th17-related cytokines are associated with disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Res 2014; 63: 943–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Isomaki P, Junttila I, Vidqvist KL, et al. The activity of JAK-STAT pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: constitutive activation of STAT3 correlates with interleukin 6 levels. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015; 54: 1103–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Veale DJ, McGonagle D, McInnes IB, et al. The rationale for Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58: 197–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nogueira M, Puig L, Torres T. JAK inhibitors for treatment of psoriasis: focus on selective TYK2 inhibitors. Drugs 2020; 80: 341–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Coskun M, Salem M, Pedersen J, et al. Involvement of JAK/STAT signaling in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol Res 2013; 76: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brennan FM, McInnes IB. Evidence that cytokines play a role in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3537–3545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chatzikyriakidou A, Georgiou I, Voulgari PV, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and TNF receptor polymorphisms in susceptibility to ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: 645–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sveaas SH, Berg IJ, Provan SA, et al. Circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and cytokine receptors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional comparative study. Scand J Rheumatol 2015; 44: 118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mylonas A, Conrad C. Psoriasis: classical vs. paradoxical. The Yin-Yang of TNF and type I interferon. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 2746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Olesen CM, Coskun M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Mechanisms behind efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacol Ther 2016; 159: 110–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Park JH, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Eisenhut M, et al. IBD immunopathogenesis: a comprehensive review of inflammatory molecules. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16: 416–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nocturne G, Mariette X. B cells in the pathogenesis of primary Sjogren syndrome. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 133–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kao L, Chung L, Fiorentino DF. Pathogenesis of dermatomyositis: role of cytokines and interferon. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2011; 13: 225–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Morand EF, Furie R, Tanaka Y, et al. Trial of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 211–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Riggle K, Patel A, Aggarwal R. Ab0599 Treatment of refractory dermatomyositis with tofacitinib. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79(Suppl. 1): 1596. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Samson M, Corbera-Bellalta M, Audia S, et al. Recent advances in our understanding of giant cell arteritis pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16: 833–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kingsmore KM, Grammer AC, Lipsky PE. Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16: 32–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 – Supplemental material for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis
Click here for additional data file. (53.1KB, docx)

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis by Arthur Petitdemange, Julien Blaess, Jean Sibilia, Renaud Felten and Laurent Arnaud in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease

sj-docx-2-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 – Supplemental material for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis
Click here for additional data file. (75.2KB, docx)

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-tab-10.1177_1759720X20969261 for Shared development of targeted therapies among autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a systematic repurposing analysis by Arthur Petitdemange, Julien Blaess, Jean Sibilia, Renaud Felten and Laurent Arnaud in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES