Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Dec 17;10:22124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79144-x

MEK reduces cancer-specific PpIX accumulation through the RSK-ABCB1 and HIF-1α-FECH axes

Vipin Shankar Chelakkot 1, Kaiwen Liu 1, Ema Yoshioka 1, Shaykat Saha 1, Danyang Xu 1, Maria Licursi 1, Ann Dorward 1, Kensuke Hirasawa 1,
PMCID: PMC7747616  PMID: 33335181

Abstract

The efficacy of aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-based photodynamic diagnosis (5-ALA-PDD) and photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT) is dependent on 5-ALA-induced cancer-specific accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). We previously reported that inhibition of oncogenic Ras/MEK increases PpIX accumulation in cancer cells by reducing PpIX efflux through ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1) and ferrochelatase (FECH)-catalysed PpIX conversion to haem. Here, we sought to identify the downstream pathways of Ras/MEK involved in the regulation of PpIX accumulation via ABCB1 and FECH. First, we demonstrated that Ras/MEK activation reduced PpIX accumulation in RasV12-transformed NIH3T3 cells and HRAS transgenic mice. Knockdown of p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSK) 2, 3, or 4 increased PpIX accumulation in RasV12-transformed NIH3T3 cells. Further, treatment with an RSK inhibitor reduced ABCB1 expression and increased PpIX accumulation. Moreover, HIF-1α expression was reduced when RasV12-transformed NIH3T3 cells were treated with a MEK inhibitor, demonstrating that HIF-1α is a downstream element of MEK. HIF-1α inhibition decreased FECH activity and increased PpIX accumulation. Finally, we demonstrated the involvement of RSKs and HIF-1α in the regulation of PpIX accumulation in human cancer cell lines. These results demonstrate that the RSK-ABCB1 and HIF-1α-FECH axes are the downstream pathways of Ras/MEK involved in the regulation of PpIX accumulation.

Subject terms: Targeted therapies, Cancer imaging

Introduction

The haem biosynthesis pathway, which is present in all cells, plays essential roles in cellular metabolism, including oxygen transport, regulation of cellular oxidation, and drug metabolism1. Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) synthase is the first and a rate-limiting enzyme in the haem biosynthesis pathway. It synthesises 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), which is then fluxed through the haem biosynthesis pathway, leading to the production of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). PpIX is a fluorescent molecule and the immediate precursor of haem. As cancer cells generate high amounts of PpIX when treated with exogenous 5-ALA, PpIX fluorescence can be used for photodynamic diagnosis of tumours (5-ALA-PDD)24. Moreover, irradiating PpIX with light of specific wavelength triggers the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to cancer cell death. This is known as photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT)5. 5-ALA-PDD was recently approved by the US FDA for intraoperative optical imaging of tumours in patients with high-grade gliomas6,7, while 5-ALA-PDT has been in use in the clinic for treating non-melanoma skin cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and cancers of the oesophagus8.

It is generally believed that oncogenic transformation promotes 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in cancer cells. Transformation of mouse fibroblast cells with oncogenes such as K-ras or c-myc increased 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation9. Similarly, Ras-transformed human mammary epithelial HB4a cells produced higher amounts of PpIX compared to parental HB4a cells when treated with 5-ALA10. Furthermore, oncogenic transformation increases the expression of some enzymes in the haem biosynthesis pathway, including, porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase (CPOX), and porphobilinogen synthase (PBGS), accelerating the synthesis of PpIX1113. These findings demonstrate that oncogenic transformation is a driver for PpIX accumulation.

In contrast, we identified that the activation of MEK, a downstream element of Ras, reduces 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation through two independent pathways ‒ increased expression of ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1), one of the PpIX efflux pumps, and increased activity of ferrochelatase (FECH), the enzyme that catalyses the conversion of PpIX to haem (Fig. 1)14. Furthermore, treatment with a MEK inhibitor significantly increased the efficacy of tumour diagnosis (5-ALA-PDD) and treatment (5-ALA-PDT) in animal models14,15. Importantly, the promotion of PpIX accumulation by MEK inhibition was cancer-specific, as it was not observed in normal cells in vitro and healthy organs in vivo. Our studies demonstrated that oncogenic activation of Ras/MEK is an excellent therapeutic target to promote the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT. These findings are consistent with other studies that showed that MEK inhibition increases cancer cell death induced by 5-ALA-PDT16 and that the activation of ERK, a downstream element of Ras/MEK, underlies cancer cell resistance to 5-ALA-PDT17. Overall, Ras/MEK activation reduces PpIX accumulation leading to lower efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT. Considering that oncogenic transformation is known to accelerate PpIX accumulation, other oncogenic pathways or Ras downstream elements other than MEK may activate the enzymatic steps in the haem biosynthesis pathway leading to increased PpIX production. Nevertheless, further studies are required to understand the detailed molecular mechanisms by which oncogenic transformation regulates cellular PpIX accumulation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) generation in normal and cancer cells. Upon exogenous stimulation with 5-ALA, cells generate PpIX via the haem biosynthesis pathway. PpIX is subsequently converted to haem by FECH or transported outside the cells through efflux receptors such as ABCB1. As oncogenic transformation activates enzymes of the haem biosynthesis pathway, cancer cells generate PpIX more efficiently than normal cells. As the Ras/MEK pathway promotes PpIX conversion to haem and PpIX efflux through ABCB1, MEK inhibition further enhances PpIX accumulation in cancer cells.

Activated Ras/MEK phosphorylates ERK 1 and 2, which in turn can activate multiple downstream signalling molecules such as MAP kinase-interacting kinases (MNKs), mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases (MSKs), and 90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinases (RSK)18. These downstream elements regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival by modulating the transcription and translation of specific proteins. Although we previously demonstrated the involvement of MEK and ERKs in PpIX regulation14, the Ras/MEK downstream elements responsible for the regulation of ABCB1 and FECH remains unidentified. Identifying the downstream elements is critical in gaining a better understanding of the cancer-specific accumulation of PpIX, the central cellular mechanism for 5-ALA-PDD and PDT. In addition, the identified downstream elements could be better therapeutic targets than upstream MEK for improving the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT as they may have fewer off-target effects. Finally, they can be developed as prognostic markers to predict the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT in clinical settings. To this end, in this study, we sought to identify the downstream elements of Ras/MEK that regulate PpIX efflux through ABCB1 and PpIX conversion to haem by FECH.

Results

Ras/MEK regulates 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in mouse fibroblasts and transgenic mouse systems

In our previous studies, we used human cancer cell lines to demonstrate the regulation of PpIX accumulation via the Ras/MEK pathway14,15. As most human cancer cell lines have mutations that activate multiple oncogenic signalling pathways, it is often difficult to interpret the specific roles of a single activated pathway. Therefore, to eliminate the effects of other oncogenic signalling pathways on PpIX accumulation, we used RasV12-transformed mouse fibroblast NIH3T3 cell line, in which the Ras pathway is the only activated oncogenic pathway. As a first step, we confirmed that oncogenic activation of Ras/MEK reduces PpIX accumulation in the mouse fibroblast system. RasV12 cells were treated with or without three different MEK inhibitors (U0126, Selumetinib, or Trametinib) for 20 h and then with 5-ALA for 4 h (Fig. 2). Western blot analysis demonstrated that the amount of phosphorylated ERK was reduced in RasV12 cells treated with the inhibitors, suggesting that the Ras/MEK pathway was effectively inhibited. Treatment with all three MEK inhibitors significantly increased 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in RasV12 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2). Treatment of the MEK inhibitors did not affect cell proliferation/survival of RasV12 cells (Fig. S2). This is most likely because all the experiments were conducted within 24 h of the inhibitor treatment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MEK inhibition increases PpIX accumulation in RasV12 cells. RAS V12 cells were treated with different concentrations of MEK inhibitors (A) U0126, (B) Selumetinib, or (C) Trametinib for 20 h, followed by 5 mM 5-ALA for 4 h. The plots show mean ± SD PpIX fluorescence from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Turkey's posthoc test. Western blots analysis of phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) and total ERK (t-ERK) confirmed effective MEK inhibition. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated.

To further determine the regulation of PpIX accumulation by mouse Ras/MEK in vivo, we used male HRAS transgenic mice, which spontaneously develop tumours in the thoracic region. This model was previously used to confirm that in vivo administration of 5-ALA results in tumour-specific accumulation of PpIX19. Once the mice developed palpable tumours, they were treated i.p. with the MEK inhibitor U0126 or control vehicle; 5 h later the mice received i.p. 5-ALA, and tumour fluorescence was evaluated 2 h later (Fig. 3). PpIX fluorescence in tumour homogenates was significantly increased in tumours of mice treated with the MEK inhibitor and 5-ALA compared to those treated only with 5-ALA (Fig. 3A). This increase in PpIX fluorescence was evident in the tumours under blue light and confirmed by heat map analysis of the tumour images (Fig. 3B). These results indicate the presence of Ras/MEK-mediated regulation of PpIX accumulation in the in vitro and in vivo mouse systems.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MEK inhibition enhanced tumour PpIX fluorescence in spontaneous tumours developed in HRAS transgenic mice. HRAS mice with palpable salivary gland tumours were treated i.v. with U0126 or control vehicle for 5 h and then i.p. with 5-ALA for 2 h. (A) PpIX fluorescence in tumour homogenates normalised to total protein between mice treated with vehicle control + ALA and mice treated with U0126 + ALA is shown (n = 8/group). *p < 0.05 by Student's t-test. (B) Representative image of tumours in HRAS transgenic mice left untreated or treated with vehicle control + 5-ALA, or U0126 + 5-ALA and heat map generated based on tumour fluorescence.

Ras/MEK regulates 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation via ABCB1 and FECH in the mouse fibroblast system

In our previous study, we demonstrated using human cancer cell lines, that Ras/MEK increases ABCB1 expression and FECH activity to promote PpIX efflux and its conversion to haem, respectively14. Here, we determined whether these regulatory axes are present in the mouse fibroblast system (Fig. 4). Flow cytometry analysis showed that ABCB1 expression was higher in RasV12 cells compared to that in parental NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 4A). The expression of ABCB1 on RasV12 cells was significantly reduced (Fig. 4B) when they were treated with different concentrations of U0126 (5, 10, and 20 µM), suggesting that Ras/MEK regulates ABCB1 expression. To determine the involvement of the Ras/MEK-FECH axis, we evaluated FECH activity in RasV12 and NIH3T3 cells. FECH activity was significantly higher in RasV12 cells but was reduced to the level of the parental NIH3T3 cells when treated with a MEK inhibitor (Fig. 4C). Western blot analysis also demonstrated that MEK inhibition decreased FECH expression in RasV12 cells (Fig. 4D). These results confirm that the Ras/MEK-ABCB1 and Ras/MEK-FECH axes are involved in regulating 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in the mouse fibroblast system.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Oncogenic Ras/MEK regulates PpIX accumulation via ABCB1 and FECH. (A) Representative overlay histograms showing surface ABCB1 expression in NIH3T3 cells and RasV12 cells treated with or without different concentrations of MEK inhibitor, U0126. (B) Plot shows mean ± SD mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from 3 independent experiments. (C) Mean ± SD relative FECH activity in NIH3T3 cells and RasV12 cells treated with or without different concentrations of U0126 from 3 independent experiments. (D) Representative western blot showing FECH expression and ERK phosphorylation levels in NIH3T3 and RasV12 cells treated with or without different concentrations of U0126. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated. *p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Turkey's posthoc test.

RSKs are the downstream elements of Ras/MEK that regulate 5-ALA induced PpIX accumulation via ABCB1 expression

Activated Ras/MEK phosphorylates ERK1 and 2, which, in turn, activate MNKs, MSKs, and RSKs18. As the interaction of RSK and ABCB1 was previously reported20, we sought to determine whether RSKs are involved in the regulation of PpIX accumulation. First, we confirmed that MEK inhibition reduced RSK phosphorylation (p-RSK) in a dose-dependent manner, demonstrating that RSKs are the downstream elements of Ras/MEK in RasV12 cells (Fig. 5A). To determine whether RSKs regulate PpIX accumulation, we knocked down RSK1, RSK2, RSK3, and RSK4, and evaluated PpIX accumulation. As shown by RT-PCR (RSK1, 3, and 4) and western blot analyses (RSK2), the RNAi knockdown efficiently reduced the expression of each RSK (Fig. 5B). Knockdown of RSK2, RSK3, or RSK4, but not RSK1, promoted PpIX accumulation in RasV12 cells treated with 5-ALA, suggesting that these RSKs are the downstream elements of Ras/MEK responsible for decreasing PpIX accumulation (Fig. 5C). For further confirmation, we tested the effect of SL0101, a pan-RSK inhibitor21, on PpIX accumulation in RasV12 cells (Fig. 5D). RSK inhibition significantly increased 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation. We also found that treatment with SL0101 reduced the expression of ABCB1 in RasV12 cells (Fig. 5E). These results demonstrate that Ras/MEK activates RSKs, which in turn upregulate ABCB1 expression, resulting in increased PpIX efflux.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Oncogenic Ras regulates ABCB1 expression via RSKs. (A) Representative western blot showing RSK phosphorylation in RasV12 cells with or without MEK inhibition. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated. (B) (Top) Representative gel image showing RSK1, RSK2, and RSK3 cDNA levels in RasV12 cells treated with or without various RSK siRNAs. (Bottom) Representative western blot showing RSK2 expression in RasV12 cells treated with or without various RSK siRNAs. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated. Mean ± SD PpIX fluorescence in RasV12 cells (C) transfected with siRNA against RSKs and (D) treated with different concentrations of SL0101, a pan-RSK inhibitor. *p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Turkey's posthoc test. (E) Representative western blots showing ABCB1 expression in RAS V12 cells treated with different concentrations of SL0101. p-s6 expression was used to confirm RSK inhibition, and GAPDH was used as the loading control. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated.

Ras/MEK-induced FECH activation is mediated through HIF-1α

Another downstream branch of the Ras/MEK-mediated regulation of PpIX accumulation is the conversion of PpIX to haem by FECH14. A previous study indicated that FECH expression and activity are increased under hypoxia22. It has also been shown that Ras/MEK increases the expression of HIF-1α, a key effector of cellular hypoxia23. Therefore, we sought to determine the involvement of HIF-1α in the Ras/MEK-mediated regulation of PpIX accumulation. Consistent with previous reports23,24, MEK inhibition reduced the expression of HIF-1α in RasV12 cells treated with CoCl2, a known inducer of HIF-1α (Fig. 6A). When RasV12 cells were treated with HIF-1α inhibitor, FECH expression was reduced at the protein level but not the mRNA level (Fig. 6B), suggesting that HIF-1α regulates FECH expression at the post-transcriptional or translational levels. Furthermore, we found that FECH activity was significantly lower when RasV12 cells were treated with HIF-1α inhibitor (10 and 20 µM) (Fig. 6C). Finally, HIF-1α inhibition significantly promoted PpIX accumulation in RasV12 cells treated with 5-ALA in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6D). These results suggest that HIF-1α mediates Ras/MEK-mediated regulation of FECH, which increases the conversion rate of PpIX to haem.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Oncogenic Ras regulates FECH activity via HIF-1α. (A) Representative western blot showing HIF-1α expression in RasV12 cells treated with or without CoCl2 and different concentrations of U0126. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated. (B) Protein (Top) and mRNA (Bottom) levels of FECH in RasV12 cells treated with different concentrations of HIF-1α inhibitor. The relative band densities (RD) are indicated. RQ: relative quantification. (C,D) Mean ± SD fold change in FECH activity (C) mean ± SD PpIX fluorescence (D) in RAS V12 cell lysates treated with different concentrations of HIF-1α inhibitor from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Turkey's posthoc test.

Regulation of 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation via the Ras/MEK-RSK-ABCB1 and Ras/MEK-HIF-1α-FECH axes is present in human cancer cells

We identified that Ras/MEK regulates PpIX accumulation through two independent pathways ‒ the RSK-ABCB1 and HIF-1α-FECH axes ‒ in the mouse NIH3T3 fibroblast system. Next, we sought to determine whether these two pathways are involved in regulating 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in human cancer cells. Four human cancer cell lines, DLD-1 (colon cancer), SNB-75 (glioblastoma), Hs 578 T (breast cancer), and MDA MB 231 (breast cancer) were treated with an RSK inhibitor (SL0101), ABCB1 inhibitor (zosuquidar), or HIF-1α inhibitor (Fig. 7). RSK inhibition and HIF-1α inhibition enhanced 5-ALA-induced PpIX accumulation in all cell lines that were tested. Treatment with the ABCB1 inhibitor increased PpIX accumulation in all cell lines except MDA MB 231 cells. These results demonstrate that the RSK-ABCB1 and HIF-1α-FECH axes, which are the downstream elements of MEK responsible for reducing PpIX accumulation, are present in human cancer cells as well as Ras-transformed mouse fibroblast cells. ABCB1, HIF-1α and RSKs could be therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDT and PDD in clinical settings.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Inhibiting RSKs, ABCB1, and HIF-1α enhanced PpIX accumulation in human cancer cell lines. Human cancer cell lines DLD-1, SNB-75, Hs 578 T, and MDA MB 231 were pre-treated with or without SL0101 (RSK inhibitor), Zosuquidar (ABCB1 inhibitor), or HIF 1α inhibitor for 20 h and then with 5-ALA for 4 h. Mean ± SEM PpIX fluorescence in cell lysate compared to controls is shown. *p < 0.01 by Student's t-test.

Discussion

The cancer-specific accumulation of PpIX is the key cellular mechanism used for the detection of tumours during surgeries (5-ALA-PDD) and for inducing cancer cell death by irradiating with light of specific wavelengths (5-ALA-PDT)25. We previously demonstrated that inhibiting oncogenic Ras/MEK increases PpIX accumulation in cancer cells and promotes the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT in vitro and in vivo14,15. We demonstrated that oncogenic Ras/MEK increases PpIX efflux and PpIX conversion to haem by promoting ABCB1 expression and FECH activity, respectively14. However, it remained to be clarified how Ras/MEK regulates ABCB1 expression and FECH activity. To this end, we used mouse fibroblast cells transfected with RasV12 to systematically identify the downstream elements of Ras/MEK that regulate PpIX accumulation. Among the downstream pathways, we identified that RSKs are responsible for increasing ABCB1 expression and promoting PpIX efflux (Figs. 5 and 8). We also found that Ras/MEK activates FECH activity by increasing HIF-1α expression to promote the conversion of PpIX to haem (Figs. 6 and 8). Furthermore, we confirmed that the Ras/MEK-RSK-ABCB1 and Ras/MEK-HIF-1α-FECH axes are involved in the regulation of PpIX accumulation in human cancers, as inhibition of RSK, HIF-1α, or ABCB1 increased PpIX accumulation in multiple human cancer cell lines (Fig. 7). The increase in PpIX accumulation by inhibiting RSKs, HIF-1α, or ABCB1 in the human cancer cell lines was not as robust as that by inhibiting MEK. This might be because MEK inhibition reduces activities of both the ABCB1 and FECH axes which reduce PpIX accumulation, while inhibitors of RSK, HIF-1α, or ABCB1 suppress only one of the two axes. Identifying the downstream elements is essential to further narrow down the possible molecular mechanisms of PpIX regulation by Ras/MEK. Further, the activation of RSKs and HIF-1α, in addition to Ras/MEK, may be useful as novel biomarkers in tumour biopsy samples to accurately predict the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT in clinical settings. Additionally, RSKs and HIF-1α could be developed as new therapeutic targets for combined treatment to promote the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Reduction in PpIX accumulation through the Ras/MEK-HIF-1α-FECH and Ras/MEK-RSK-ABCB1 axes in cancer cells. Ras/MEK activation increases HIF-1α expression, which in turn increases the activity of FECH, the enzyme that catalyses the conversion of PpIX to haem. Ras/MEK activation also upregulates ABCB1 expression through RSKs, which promotes the rate of PpIX efflux.

An important finding of this study is that treatment with a MEK inhibitor increased PpIX accumulation and tumour fluorescence in a mouse model of spontaneous cancer (Fig. 3). We previously used animal models with tumour implants of human or mouse cancer cell lines, which are highly homogenous, for evaluating PpIX fluorescence in tumours14,15. In contrast, tumours in the spontaneous mouse model consist of different stages of cancer cells and maintain tumour hierarchy, which closely resembles tumours in patients. Therefore, it was important to demonstrate that MEK inhibitor treatment could improve the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD in the spontaneous mouse model.

RSKs (RSK1, RSK2, RSK3, and RSK4) are highly homologous isoforms but have distinct roles in regulating cellular processes, including growth, motility, survival, and proliferation25. RSKs are also involved in transcriptional regulation by phosphorylating various transcription factors such as cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), c-Fos, c-Jun, and Serum response factor (Srf)2628. RSKs also stimulate cap-dependent translation by phosphorylating the translation initiation factor-4B (eIF4B) and the 40S ribosomal subunit protein S6 (rpS6)29. In our RNAi experiments, we found that RSK2, RSK3, and RSK4, but not RSK1, are involved in regulating PpIX accumulation in Ras-transformed mouse fibroblast cells (Fig. 5). This is interesting as it is thought that RSK1 and RSK2 possess oncogenic functions that promote cancer cell growth, survival, and proliferation, while RSK3 and RSK4 are reported to have antitumor functions30. This may be because RSKs are known to have unidentified, as well as overlapping functions31. Furthermore, a previous study demonstrated that RSK1 increases ABCB1 expression by suppressing its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation in human cancer cells20, which is not consistent with our results. Discrepancies with the previous study might be due to the functional differences of RSKs between mice and humans. Therefore, a detailed analysis should be conducted to further clarify the roles of RSKs in ABCB1-mediated PpIX efflux.

Hypoxia is a common characteristic of advanced solid tumours, which reduces the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT by different mechanisms32. One of them is the increased expression of HIF-1α, which in turn reduces PpIX accumulation under hypoxic conditions17,33. HIF-1α is also a known transcriptional activator of the FECH gene22. Furthermore, MEK activates the transcription of HIF-1α and induces resistance to cancer therapeutics under hypoxic conditions23,24. In this study, we demonstrated that oncogenic Ras/MEK reduces PpIX accumulation by activating the HIF-1α-FECH axis. As HIF-1α plays critical roles in developing resistance against other cancer therapeutics such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, it is considered as a potential therapeutic target in cancer34. There are several HIF-1 inhibitors currently being evaluated in phase II and III clinical trials35. Therefore, once their safety and effectiveness are confirmed, it will be feasible to test the efficacy of combined 5-ALA-PDD and PDT with HIF-1α inhibitors in clinical settings. To this end, it is essential that further preclinical studies be conducted to determine the efficacy of the combined 5-ALA-PDD and PDT with HIF-1 inhibitors in animal models of cancer.

The activation of oncogenic signalling pathways is considered a major driving force for cancer-specific accumulation of PpIX36. Ras pathways are one of the oncogenic signalling pathways that were previously reported to promote PpIX accumulation. Mouse fibroblast cells transformed with Ki-ras or v-raf showed higher PpIX accumulation than parental cells9. Moreover, human breast epithelial cells transformed with Her2, an upstream element of Ras, also accumulated PpIX more efficiently than non-transformed cells12. In contrast, we previously demonstrated that inhibition of oncogenic Ras/MEK increased PpIX accumulation in ~ 60% of human cancer cell lines14. In this study, we identified that the downstream elements of Ras/MEK, RSKs, and HIF-1α negatively regulate PpIX accumulation. These results agree with the previous study demonstrating that HIF-1α activation by ERKs contributes to 5-ALA-PDT resistance17. Furthermore, similar roles of Ras/MEK have been observed in resistance to chemotherapy, where Ras/MEK activation increases drug-efflux functions of ABC transporters3739. As Ras signalling pathways regulate several other downstream elements including, phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K), Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RalGEF), and Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1), it can be assumed that these pathways are involved in the promotion of PpIX accumulation by upregulating the enzymes of the haem biosynthesis pathway. In contrast, the Ras/MEK pathway reduces PpIX accumulation by activating PpIX efflux from the cells and its conversion to haem. The cancer-specific accumulation of PpIX is a well-established concept in the filed for decades, yet, the underlying cellular mechanisms are not completely understood. As elucidating the cellular mechanisms is key to improving the efficacy of 5-ALA-PDD and PDT, it is essential to further clarify the role of oncogenic transformation in cancer-specific PpIX accumulation.

Experimental procedures

Cells and reagents

NIH3T3 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). H-Ras-transformed NIH3T3 cells were generated in-house and was described previously40,41. Human colon cancer cell line DLD-1, glioblastoma cell line SNB-75, and breast cancer cell lines Hs 578 T and MDA MB 231 were obtained from ATCC and were authenticated by STR DNA analysis (SickKids, Toronto). All cells were maintained in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Ontario, Canada), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotic–antimycotic mixture (Invitrogen) (100 units/mL penicillin G sodium) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

U0126 was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); 5-Aminolevulinic acid from Sigma (Oakville, ON); HIF-1α inhibitor (methyl 3-[[2-[4-(2-adamantyl)phenoxy]acetyl]amino]-4-hydroxybenzoate) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX); ABCB1 inhibitor, zosuquidar from Selleckchem, and pan-RSK inhibitor, SL0101 from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). Anti-phospho-ERK-1/2 and anti-phospho RSK antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA), anti-ABCB1 antibody from Alomone Labs (Israel), anti-FECH, anti-phospho-S6, anti-RSK2, anti-total ERK antibodies, and the FITC-tagged Anti-ABCB1 antibody from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-HIF-1α antibody, and anti-GAPDH antibody were purchased from Abcam (US).

Animal experiments

All animal care protocols were approved by the Memorial University of Newfoundland Animal Care Committee and were in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. B6; SJL-Tg(Wap-HRAS)69Lln Chr YSJL/J transgenic mice (hereafter referred to as HRAS mice) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (JAX Mice Stock 002,409) and were housed in a barrier unit within the central animal care facility in the Health Sciences Center at Memorial University of Newfoundland. A unique feature of this mouse model is the incorporation of the HRAS (Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) oncogene on the Y chromosome, such that male mice expressing HRAS under the mammary tissue-specific whey acidic protein (Wap) promoter develop benign adenocarcinomas between 6–8 weeks of age19,42.

Male HRAS mice at approximately three months of age were used for the study. Once the mice developed palpable tumours, they were randomly assigned to one of the three groups ‒ Control, ALA, or U0126 + ALA (n = 8 in each group). Mice in the U0126 + ALA group were intraperitoneally (i.p) injected with U0126 (20 mg/kg body weight (BW) and those in control and ALA groups were administered i.p vehicle control (DMSO/saline). Five hours after U0126 treatment, mice in the ALA and U0126 + ALA groups were administered i.p 5-ALA (200 mg/kg BW), and those in the control group were administered i.p saline. The mice were kept in their home cages and maintained in a darkened room for 2 h after ALA administration. The mice were then sacrificed by CO2 inhalation, and the tumours were excised. Tumour sizes varied from 2–10 mm in diameter and were distributed across the mammary tumour chain, primarily in the ventral, thoracic region.

The excised tumours were photographed using a Canon 6D camera fitted with a 35 mm lens mounted with a yellow 635 nm emission lens filter for fluorescence imaging. White light was used for bright field imaging, and blue light (405 nm) (Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used for fluorescence imaging. Image analysis was carried out using ImageJ (NIH), and a heat map was generated using the HeatMap Histogram plugin43. The tumours were homogenised in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer using a tissue homogeniser, and the homogenates were stored at − 80 °C for further analysis.

PpIX measurements

Cells (5 × 104/well) plated in 24-well plates were treated with U0126, SL0101, HIF-1α inhibitor, zosuquidar, or DMSO (control vehicle) for 20 h, and then with 5-ALA for 4 h. The cells were lysed using RIPA buffer. PpIX fluorescence in cell and tumour lysates was measured using a Synergy Mx Fluorescence plate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc. VT) with a 405 nm excitation/630 nm emission filter. The total protein in the tumour lysate was determined using the BCA total protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) following the manufacturer's instructions, and the PpIX fluorescence was normalised to total protein.

Protein expression analysis

Cells treated with or without the inhibitors were lysed using RIPA buffer supplemented with aprotinin (Sigma), and Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (100X) (Thermo Scientific). The protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Canada). The expression levels of ABCB1, FECH, p-ERK, t-ERK, RSK2, p-RSK, p-S6, or HIF-1α were determined using the corresponding antibodies as described previously44. For determining the cell surface expression of ABCB1, cells (107 cells) treated with or without different concentrations of U0126 were suspended in 100 µl flow cytometry buffer (PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 2 mM EDTA), and incubated with 10 µl anti-ABCB1-FITC antibody in the dark for 15 min at 4 °C. The cells were then washed with and re-suspended in 500 µl flow cytometry buffer and analysed using a BC CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).

Knockdown of RSK using siRNA

The negative control siRNA and siRNA against human RSK1, RSK2, RSK3, and RSK4 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. A day before transfection, RasV12 cells (2.5 × 104 cells/well) were plated in 24-well plates. The cells were transfected with 10 pmol siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAi MAX (Life Technologies) in serum-free medium. The transfection was repeated 24 h later. Protein and RNA samples were collected 48 h after the second transfection. RSK2 protein expression was determined by western blot analysis, and the expression levels of RSK1, RSK3, and RSK4 were determined by RT-PCR.

RT-PCR and RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA (0.5 µg) was reverse transcribed (RT) to cDNA from random hexamers using the ReverAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR for RSK elements was performed on the cDNA using the following primers ‒ RSK1: (forward) 5′-GAGAGACATCCTCGCTGACG-3′, (reverse) 5′-TGCCTAGCTTCGCCTTCAAA-3′; RSK3: (forward) 5′-CTCCCAAGGGG TTGTCCATC-3′, (reverse) 5′-CACGGGTGCTTCAACACTTG-3′; RSK4: (forward) 5′-GTTGGCTGGCTACACTCCAT-3′, (reverse) 5′-ATATGGTGCTGCCACTGCTT-3′; GAPDH: (forward) 5′-GGGTGGAGCCAAACGGGTCA-3′, (reverse) 5′-GGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCA-3′. Cycling conditions were: 94 °C for 5 min followed by 34 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 66 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min; followed by a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis using RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining Solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Korea).

Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) for FECH was performed in triplicate on the cDNA using the following primer set. FECH: (forward) 5′-GATGGAGAGAGATGGACTAGA-3′, (reverse) 3′- TGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTT-5′; GAPDH: (forward) 5′- GATGGAGAGAGATGGACTAGA-3′, (reverse) 3′-TGCAAAGCACTGGATGAG-5′. A five-point, five-fold dilution series was used for primer validation. The absence of non-specific amplification was confirmed by a single peak in the melt-curve analysis; the amplicon size and the absence of amplification in the no template control were confirmed by agarose gel analysis. qPCR was performed in triplicate on the StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems CA, USA) using the powerSYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies LTD, UK). Cycling conditions were: 50 °C for 3 min, 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 40 °C for 1 min. The relative FECH mRNA level was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

FECH activity assay

FECH activity was measured by aerobic enzymatic formation of zinc-protoporphyrin IX (Zn-PpIX) using a modified van Hillegersberg method, as described previously45,46. Briefly, cell lysates were incubated with 200 µM PpIX (Sigma Aldrich) in 200 µL assay buffer (0.1 M Tris–HCl, 1 mM palmitic acid (Sigma Aldrich) and 0.3% v/v Tween 20, pH 8.0) and then 50 µL 2 mM zinc acetate solution was added. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 500 µL ice-cold stop buffer (1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in 30:70 DMSO/ methanol). The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min, and Zn-PpIX in the supernatant was measured using a Synergy Mx Fluorescence plate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc. VT) with a 405 nm excitation/590 nm emission filter. Heat-inactivated cell lysates were included as a negative control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 7.0 (GraphPad). Student's t-test was used for inter-group comparison, and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc test was used to compare between multiple groups. p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for in vitro and in vivo experiments, respectively.

Supplementary information

Author contributions

V.S.C., K.L., E.Y., S.S., D.X., and M.L. performed the experiments. V.S.C. and K.H. prepared the manuscript, A.D. provided the mouse model and oversaw the in vivo experiments, K.H. conceptualised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants (to KH) from the Canadian Cancer Society (CCSRI). VSC is a Cancer Research Training Program (CRTP) postdoctoral trainee of the Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute (BHCRI) with funds provided by The Terry Fox Foundation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-79144-x.

References

  • 1.Heinemann IU, Jahn M, Jahn D. The biochemistry of heme biosynthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;474:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Steinbach P, et al. Cellular fluorescence of the endogenous photosensitiser protoporphyrin IX following exposure to 5-aminolevulinic acid. Photochem. Photobiol. 1995;62:887–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb09152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Filonenko EV, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid in intraoperative photodynamic therapy of bladder cancer (results of multicenter trial) Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2016;16:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fiorito V, Chiabrando D, Petrillo S, Bertino F, Tolosano E. The multifaceted role of heme in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1540. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cengel KA, Simone CB, Glatstein EPDT. What's past is prologue. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2497–2499. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride, known as ALA HCl (Gleolan, NX Development Corp.) as an optical imaging agent indicated in patients with gliomas|FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/aminolevulinic-acid-hydrochloride-known-ala-hcl-gleolan-nx-development-corp-optical-imaging-agent.
  • 7.Hadjipanayis CG, Stummer W, Sheehan JP. 5-ALA fluorescence-guided surgery of CNS tumors. J. Neurooncol. 2019;141:477–478. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03109-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agostinis P, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:250–281. doi: 10.3322/caac.20114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li G, et al. Rodent fibroblast model for studies of response of malignant cells to exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;80:676–684. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rodriguez L, Divenosa G, Batlle A, Macrobert A, Casas A. Response to ALA-based PDT in an immortalised normal breast cell line and its counterpart transformed with the Ras oncogene. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2007;6:1306–1310. doi: 10.1039/b704235c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krieg RC, Fickweiler S, Wolfbeis OS, Knuechel R. Cell-type specific protoporphyrin IX metabolism in human bladder cancer in vitro. Photochem. Photobiol. 2000;72:226–233. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)072&#x0003c;0226:CTSPIM&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang X, Palasuberniam P, Myers KA, Wang C, Chen B. Her2 oncogene transformation enhances 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated protoporphyrin IX production and photodynamic therapy response. Oncotarget. 2016;7:57798–57810. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krieg RC, Messmann H, Rauch J, Seeger S, Knuechel R. Metabolic characterization of tumor cell–specific protoporphyrin IX accumulation after exposure to 5-aminolevulinic acid in human colonic cells¶. Photochem. Photobiol. 2002;76:518. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)076&#x0003c;0518:MCOTCS&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoshioka E, et al. Enhancement of cancer-specific protoporphyrin IX fluorescence by targeting oncogenic Ras/MEK pathway. Theranostics. 2018;8:2134–2146. doi: 10.7150/thno.22641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chelakkot VS, et al. Systemic MEK inhibition enhances the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;121:758–767. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0586-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ge X, et al. Inhibition of MAPK signaling pathways enhances cell death induced by 5-Aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy in skin squamous carcinoma cells. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2016;26:164–172. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2015.2725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lamberti MJ, et al. Transcriptional activation of HIF-1 by a ROS-ERK axis underlies the resistance to photodynamic therapy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kyriakis JM, Avruch J. Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. Physiol. Rev. 2001;81:807–869. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dorward AM, Fancher KS, Duffy TM, Beamer WG, Walt H. Early neoplastic and metastatic mammary tumours of transgenic mice detected by 5-aminolevulinic acid-stimulated protoporphyrin IX accumulation. Br. J. Cancer. 2005;93:1137–1143. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Katayama K, Fujiwara C, Noguchi K, Sugimoto Y. RSK1 protects P-glycoprotein/ABCB1 against ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation by downregulating the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 R1. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36134. doi: 10.1038/srep36134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ludwik KA, et al. Development of a RSK inhibitor as a novel therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:2598–2608. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu YL, Ang SO, Weigent DA, Prchal JT, Bloomer JR. Regulation of ferrochelatase gene expression by hypoxia. Life Sci. 2004;75:2035–2043. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marampon F, et al. Hypoxia sustains glioblastoma radioresistance through ERKs/DNA-PKcs/HIF-1α functional interplay. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;44:2121–2131. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lim J-H, et al. Ras-dependent induction of HIF-1alpha785 via the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway: a novel mechanism of Ras-mediated tumor promotion. Oncogene. 2004;23:9427–9431. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carriere A, Ray H, Blenis J, Roux PP. The RSK factors of activating the Ras/MAPK signaling cascade. Front. Biosci. 2008;13:4258–4275. doi: 10.2741/3003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De Cesare D, Jacquot S, Hanauer A, Sassone-Corsi P. Rsk-2 activity is necessary for epidermal growth factor-induced phosphorylation of CREB protein and transcription of c-fos gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:12202–12207. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen RH, Sarnecki C, Blenis J. Nuclear localisation and regulation of erk- and rsk-encoded protein kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992;12:915–927. doi: 10.1128/MCB.12.3.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heidenreich O, et al. MAPKAP kinase 2 phosphorylates serum response factor in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:14434–14443. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.20.14434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shahbazian D, et al. The mTOR/PI3K and MAPK pathways converge on eIF4B to control its phosphorylation and activity. EMBO J. 2006;25:2781–2791. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Romeo Y, Roux PP. Paving the way for targeting RSK in cancer. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2011;15:5–9. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2010.531014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lara R, Seckl MJ, Pardo OE. The p90 RSK family members: common functions and isoform specificity. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5301–5308. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Larue L, et al. Fighting hypoxia to improve PDT. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:163. doi: 10.3390/ph12040163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Albert I, Hefti M, Luginbuehl V. Physiological oxygen concentration alters glioma cell malignancy and responsiveness to photodynamic therapy in vitro. Neurol. Res. 2014;36:1001–1010. doi: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fallah J, Rini BI. HIF inhibitors: status of current clinical development. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019;21:6. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0752-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wigerup C, Påhlman S, Bexell D. Therapeutic targeting of hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016;164:152–169. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang X, Palasuberniam P, Kraus D, Chen B. Aminolevulinic acid-based tumor detection and therapy: molecular mechanisms and strategies for enhancement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:25865–25880. doi: 10.3390/ijms161025865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schaich M, Illmer T. Mdr1 gene expression and mutations in Ras proto-oncogenes in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2002;43:1345–1354. doi: 10.1080/10428190290033279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Y-J, et al. Regorafenib overcomes chemotherapeutic multidrug resistance mediated by ABCB1 transporter in colorectal cancer: in vitro and in vivo study. Cancer Lett. 2017;396:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mulay V, et al. Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase Erk1/2 promotes protein degradation of ATP binding cassette transporters A1 and G1 in CHO and HuH7 cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Battcock SM, Collier TW, Zu D, Hirasawa K. Negative regulation of the alpha interferon-induced antiviral response by the Ras/Raf/MEK pathway. J. Virol. 2006;80:4422–4430. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.9.4422-4430.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Christian SL, et al. Activated Ras/MEK inhibits the antiviral response of alpha interferon by reducing STAT2 levels. J. Virol. 2009;83:6717–6726. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02213-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Andres AC, et al. Ha-ras oncogene expression directed by a milk protein gene promoter: tissue specificity, hormonal regulation, and tumor-induction in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:1299–1303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.HeatMap Histogram [ImageJ Documentation Wiki]. https://imagejdocu.tudor.lu/plugin/analysis/heatmap_histogram/start.
  • 44.Komatsu Y, et al. Oncogenic Ras inhibits IRF1 to promote viral oncolysis. Oncogene. 2015;34:3985–3993. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Van Hillegersberg R, Van den Berg JW, Kort WJ, Terpstra OT, Wilson JH. Selective accumulation of endogenously produced porphyrins in a liver metastasis model in rats. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:647–651. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90860-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kemmner W, et al. Silencing of human ferrochelatase causes abundant protoporphyrin-IX accumulation in colon cancer. FASEB J. 2008;22:500–509. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8888com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES