In the article [1], there were errors in the results section of the abstract and Table 2 on e25624.
-
1
In the results, the 3rd sentence reads:
Table 2.
Parameters | TDF/FTC once daily + Oskept® twice daily (N = 37) | TDF/FTC once daily (N = 42) | p‐value** | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | Change median (IQR) | p‐value* | Median (IQR) | Median change (IQR) | p‐value* | ||
LSBMD (g/cm2) | |||||||
Month 0 | 0.92 (0.82 to 1.00) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.05) | <0.001 | 0.95 (0.85 to 1.01) | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) | <0.001 | 0.02 |
Month 6 | 0.97 (0.84 to 1.03) | 0.98 (0.86 to 1.05) | |||||
LSBMD z‐score | |||||||
Month 0 | −0.9 (−1.7 to −0.4) | 0.3 (0 to 0.4) | <0.001 | −0.6 (−1.5 to −0.1) | 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.3) | 0.007 | 0.25 |
Month 6 | −0.6 (−1.4 to −0.2) | −0.6 (−1.4 to 0.2) | |||||
25OHD, ng/mL | |||||||
Month 0 | 21.3 (18.9 to 26.0) | 0.1 (−4.9 to 3.6) | 0.92 | 21.2 (17.2 to 24.9) | −1.7 (−3.1 to 1.5) | 0.08 | 0.43 |
Month 6 | 21.5 (18.3 to 25.8) | 20.4 (16.0 to 24.4) | |||||
iPTH, pg/mL | |||||||
Month 0 | 38.7 (31.3 to 53.5) | 4.9 (−4.2 to 13.5) | 0.08 | 40.8 (30.8 to 57.8) | 5.8 (−6.7 to 20.8) | 0.07 | 0.77 |
Month 6 | 44.1 (33.1 to 64.6) | 45.0 (35.4 to 62.6) | |||||
Calcium, mg/dL | |||||||
Month 0 | 9.9 (9.6 to 10.1) | −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.1) | 0.11 | 9.9 (9.5 to 10.0) | −0.2 (−0.5 to 0.1) | 0.11 | 0.93 |
Month 6 | 9.6 (9.4 to 10.0) | 9.7 (9.4 to 9.9) | |||||
Phosphorus, mg/dL | |||||||
Month 0 | 3.3 (3.1 to 3.9) | 0 (−0.3 to 0.4) | 0.57 | 3.5 (3.0 to 3.7) | 0.3 (0 to 0.7) | 0.001 | 0.06 |
Month 6 | 3.5 (3.2 to 3.8) | 3.7 (3.4 to 3.9) | |||||
ALP, U/L | |||||||
Month 0 | 69 (59 to 87) | −0.5 (−8 to 7) | 0.94 | 79 (66 to 87) | −1 (−7 to 8) | 0.62 | 0.68 |
Month 6 | 71 (57 to 88) | 76 (65 to 86) |
25 OHD, 25 hydroxyvitamin D; intact parathyroid hormone; iPTH; LSBMD; lumbar spine bone mineral density.
p‐value comparison between months 0 and 6 within arms done with the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
p‐value for comparing median difference between arms done with the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test.
The median amount of calcium intake from nutritional three‐day recall was 167 (IQR 94 to 272) mg/day, 39% of participants had vitamin D deficiency, defined as 25(OH)D levels <20 IU/mL.
The sentence should have read:
The median amount of calcium intake from nutritional three‐day recall was 167 (IQR 94 to 272) mg/day, 39% of participants had vitamin D deficiency, defined as 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/mL.
-
2
In the results, the last sentence reads:
There were significantly higher increases in LSBMD among youth with vitamin D deficiency who were supplemented; arm A + 0.05 (0 to 0.05) compared to arm B + 0.03 (−0.1 to 0.03), p = 0.04.
The sentence should have read:
There were significantly higher increases in LSBMD among youth with vitamin D deficiency who were supplemented; arm A + 0.05 (0 to 0.05) compared to arm B + 0.03 (0 to 0.03), p = 0.04.
-
3
In Table 2, there were numerical errors. The correct Table is shown below:
CORRIGENDUM. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020; 23(00):e25657
REFERENCE
- 1. Pornpaisalsakul K, Songtaweesin WN, Tepmongkol S, Wongharn P, Kawichai S, Suponsilchai V, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on bone mineral density among Thai youth using daily HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:e25624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]