Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2020 Feb 3;5(1):980–981. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1719931

Evolutionary status of the invasive muskrat Ondatra zibethicus revealed by complete mitochondrial genome

Lina Zhang a,*, Han Zhang b,*, Yan Hua c,
PMCID: PMC7748713  PMID: 33366836

Abstract

The muskrat Ondatra zibethicus is native to North America, However it has successfully dispersed into most areas of northeast China in the past decades, which may lead to potential impact on endemic eco-system. We determined and annotated the whole mtDNA genome of the muskrat O. zibethicus to better understand the evolutionary relationship of this invasive species with other Rodentia distributed in China. The complete mitogenome is 16,351 bp in length, includes 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes, and a control region. We built the phylogenetic tree of muskrat and other 11 most closely related Rodentia species.

Keywords: mtDNA genome, evolutionary relationship, muskrat Ondatra zibethicus


The muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) is a highly adaptable rodent native to North America (Simpson and Boutin 1993; Greenhorn et al. 2017). Due to natural diffusion and the rise of fur breeding, the muskrat’s proliferation in China has been greatly promoted. From 1927, the former Soviet Union began to release muskrats in areas such as Amur River Basin. In the 1950s, muskrats were widespread in the waters of China’s Heilongjiang border region. In order to develop the fur animal industry, the Chinese government started stocking muskrat. There are also some people in Heilongjiang Province of China who have begun to raise them.

Alien species invasion is one of the serious global problems facing the ecosystem (Rotherham and Lambert 2012; Jo et al. 2017). The ecological cost is the loss of native species diversity and species extinction, which constitute an important threat to the conservation and sustainable utilization of biological diversity and the human living environment (Danell 1979; Bos and Ydenberg 2011). With the increasing frequency of introduction and trade between regions in the global animal breeding industry, the artificial introduction has become one of the important channels for the invasion of foreign species. Although the Chinese government attaches great importance to the protection of species, the genetic evolution of muskrat remains unclear in Northeast China, and its population status and genetic evolution also are unclear.

In order to find out the origin and genetic evolution relationship of muskrat, we collected feral muskrat samples in the Songhua river basin around Harbin city, Heilongjiang province, China (N45.808596°, E126.584059°). The muskrat samples were accidentally caught by fishermen. To provide a reference for scientific management and effective prevention and control of muskrat invasion, we conducted genetic research with samples. And as part of the research, we determined and annotated the complete mitochondrial genome of an invasive muskrat, O. zibethicus, using 13 pairs of primers (Saccone et al. 1999). The muscle tissue used for DNA extraction and analysis was sampled from and the specimen is stored in the Feline Research Center of Chinese State Forestry Administration, China. The sample number is NEFU-F2-19-75.

In addition, to reveal the phylogenetic relationship of this species, we reconstructed the complete mitochondrial genome-based neighbor-joining tree of the muskrat O. zibethicus and other 11 Rodentia species (Gibson et al. 2004) distributed in China with Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA version 7 (Kumar et al. 2016), and the tree was tested with 1000 Bootstrap replications. The complete mitogenome of O. zibethicus is 16,351 bp in length (GenBank accession number MN 485774), which is made up of 13 protein-coding genes, 2 rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a control region. The overall base composition is A: 34.5%, T: 27.6%, C: 25.3%, and G: 12.7%, with a much higher A + T content.

The phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree is shown in Figure 1 and we can see from the figure that the muskrat O. zibethicus is closest to the genus Eothenomys with high support. This study can provide the basis for the genetic evolution of muskrat.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of muskrat and other 11 species of Rodentia constructed by MEGA Version 7.0. COI (Boykin et al. 2007) gene sequence of other 11 species of Rodentia are downloaded from NCBI and the GenBank accession numbers are given in the bracket after the species name.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate Qingbin Hao for providing feral muskrat tissue samples.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Bos D, Ydenberg R. 2011. Evaluation of alternative management strategies of muskrat Ondatra zibethicus population control using a population model. Wildlife Biol. 2:143–156. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boykin LM, Shatters RG, Jr, Rosell RC, McKenzie CL, Bagnall RA, De Barro P, Frohlich DR. 2007. Global relationships of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) revealed using Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial COI DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 3:1306–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Danell K. 1979. Reduction of aquatic vegetation following the colonization of a northern Swedish lake by the muskrat, Ondatra zibethica. Oecologia. 1:101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibson A, Gowri-Shankar V, Higgs PG, Rattray M. 2004. A comprehensive analysis of mammalian mitochondrial genome base composition and improved phylogenetic methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2:251–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenhorn JE, Sadowski C, Holden J, Bowman J. 2017. Coastal wetlands connected to Lake Ontario have reduced muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) abundance. Wetlands. 2:339–349. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jo Y-S, Derbridge JJ, Baccus JT. 2017. History and current status of invasive nutria and common muskrat in Korea. Wetlands. 2:363–369. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. Mega7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 7:1870–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rotherham ID, Lambert RA. 2012. Invasive and introduced plants and animals: human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. London: Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saccone C, De Giorgi C, Gissi C, Pesole G, Reyes A. 1999. Evolutionary genomics in metazoa: the mitochondrial DNA as a model system. Gene. 1:195–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simpson MR, Boutin S. 1993. Muskrat life history: a comparison of a northern and southern population. Ecography. 1:5–10. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES