Highlights
-
•
No significant differences were observed in habitual daily or hourly rates of physical activity (PA) or sedentary time among a nationally representative sample of preschoolers from 4 childcare environments (center based, home based, stayed at home with parent, school).
-
•
No significant differences in daily or hourly rates of PA (moderate-to-vigorous PA, total PA) were observed in boys or girls separately across the 4 childcare settings.
-
•
Daily and hourly rates of sedentary time were similar for boys and for girls.
Keywords: Early learning environment, Motor activity, Preschool, Screen time
Abstract
Background
Children spend substantial time in childcare, and the reasons parents choose a particular childcare type may differ by family. However, little is known about how childcare type influences habitual (full day) activity levels among children. Therefore, exploring patterns between childcare type and habitual physical activity (PA) (i.e., light, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and total PA) and sedentary time (ST) in young Canadian children is needed.
Methods
A nationally representative sample of preschoolers from Cycles 3 and 4 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey was used in this cross-sectional study. Childcare type (e.g., center-based childcare, home-based childcare, home with parent, kindergarten) was reported by parents. Preschoolers wore an Actical accelerometer for 7 days. Device and population-spcific cut-points were applied to delineate PA intensities and ST. Population means and sample totals were calculated to examine average daily and hourly rates of activity.
Results
Preschoolers’ rates of MVPA and total PA from the 4 childcare arrangements ranged from 65.99 min/day to 74.62 min/day (5.48–6.18 min/h) and 274.20 min/day to 281.66 min/day 22.69–23.21 min/h), respectively, while ST ranged from 443.13 min/day to 460.57 min/day (36.80–37.31 min/h). No significant differences were observed in daily or hourly rates of activity.
Conclusion
This study provides a snapshot of the levels of PA and ST among preschoolers in various childcare settings at a national level, with no differences observed in habitual activity levels based on childcare enrollment. Additional research is needed to clarify the relationship between young children's PA and childcare type, with consideration given to the quality of the childcare settings.
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
The increase in dual-earner families,1 and consequently in childcare enrollment, has resulted in approximately 80% of Canadian preschoolers attending these facilities.2 Childcare refers to mainly center-based and home-based facilities (varying in size) that offer group-based care outside of the child's home. In 2014, the percentage of parents with children aged 4 and under using childcare on a full-time basis (at least 30 h per week) was 70%.3 These numbers indicate that a large proportion of young Canadian children spend many hours (48.4% of their awake time4) in these venues. Given these conditions, the childcare environment is an optimal setting in which to support the physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) behavior patterns of young Canadian children.
PA levels among young children vary across different childcare environments.5 Vanderloo et al.6 conducted a study to objectively measure the PA levels of preschoolers in center-based childcare during care hours. They found that preschoolers engaged in 1.54 min/h of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and 17.42 min/h of total PA (TPA) per day.6 Similarly, Kuzik et al.7 measured the PA levels (during childcare hours only) of children aged 1.5–5.0 years and found them to spend only 7.0% of their time, or 4.2 min/h, engaged in MVPA. Moreover, preschoolers enrolled in center-based childcare were found to be significantly less active and more sedentary than preschoolers enrolled in home-based childcare and full day kindergarten.6, 8
Little is known about the habitual activity levels of children, either outside or inside childcare settings. Previous research shows that traditionally, parents have believed children experience high levels of activity throughout the day.9 This could lead to lower levels of PA outside of childcare hours because parents may be under the impression that their children are already very active when in a childcare setting. Varying regulations across childcare types and childcare centers may influence the amount of activity children actually experience and the length of time they are sedentary during childcare hours,10 despite parental assumptions. Therefore, these regulations may indirectly influence preschoolers’ habitual activity levels throughout the day and week. In addition, parental activity habits have been shown to be influential on a child's activity levels, even when the child is away from home.9 This could be of particular importance for children in the stayed-at-home-with-parent category.
Differences in time spent outdoors may be responsible for the variation in PA and ST noted in preschoolers both during and outside of childcare time.11, 12 In particular, the outdoor playtime requirements in childcare vary substantially across Canada.13 Since 2012, eight of the 13 Canadian provinces and territories have updated their childcare regulations to include daily activity guidelines specifying duration of outdoor time and, in some cases, its intensity.13 All provinces and territories now provide general recommendations to encourage movement and some stipulate outdoor playtime specifically;13 however, not all provide requirements for intensity or duration of activity.13
To date, research exploring the habitual levels of PA and ST among preschoolers in various childcare environments has only been conducted on a small scale and during childcare hours only. Generally speaking, research has shown that preschoolers enrolled in childcare experience low levels of PA6,14, 15, 16 and high amounts of ST.8, 15 Although they offer a good foundation, these data are not drawn from a representative sample of preschoolers and childcare settings and are not generalizable across Canada due to factors such as the variability in childcare regulations10 and the varying weather conditions experienced across the nation.17 Given the large number of Canadian children enrolled in childcare, coupled with the substantial number of hours they spend in this setting and the various childcare arrangements available, exploring the association between young children's habitual PA and ST behaviors and the various childcare types is needed. Although previous research has examined the activity behaviors of young children using Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) data,18, 19, 20 to date no consideration has been given to the role of childcare type. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore PA levels and ST among a nationally representative sample of preschoolers (age 3–5 years) who receive childcare in a variety of settings (e.g., center-based and home-based childcare, school-based childcare, stayed at home with a parent). As a secondary objective, this study sought to explore differences in PA and ST in boys and girls, separately. Based on previous research,8, 21 it was hypothesized that preschoolers who attend center-based childcare would engage in less daily PA and more ST than young children enrolled in other childcare arrangements, and that females would engage in less activity than their male counterparts. This study will assist in understanding if preschoolers who attend different types of childcare engage in different habitual PA and ST. It may in turn inspire future research that will help to guide policy regarding PA and ST in childcare settings.
2. Methods
Cross-sectional in design, this study analyzed Cycle 3 (2012–2013) and Cycle 4 (2014–2015) CHMS data. Previous cycles (i.e., Cycles 1 and 2) were not included because data on childcare enrollment were not collected at that time. Health Canada's Research Ethics Board approved all CHMS procedures and tools prior to the survey being conducted.22 For young children, such as the 3- to 5-year-old preschoolers participating in this study, parents were required to provide written consent and the participant provided assent.23 For more information on the methodology behind the CHMS, please consult the CHMS user guide.24
2.1. Participants
For this study, participants were retained for analysis if they met the following 3 inclusion criteria: (a) they were between the ages of 3 and 5 years, (b) they had 3 or more valid days of PA data, and (c) they were enrolled in one of the 4 types of childcare arrangements exclusively (i.e., (1) daycare, nursery school or preschool; (2) home-based daycare; (3) school, including kindergarten; (4) stayed at home with a parent or caregiver). Participants were excluded from the analysis if they were enrolled in multiple childcare types and if they were 6 years or older.
A total of 833 participants met the age requirement for inclusion in this study. A total of 650 of those 833 participants (50.8% male) had sufficient activity monitoring data recorded in Cycle 3 and Cycle 4 for inclusion. There was an equal distribution of 3-year-olds (n = 225), 4-year-olds (n = 206) and 5-year-olds (n = 219) (Table 1). Participant distribution across the 4 childcare arrangements was as follows: 27.5% center-based childcare, 9.5% home-based childcare, 32.1% stayed at home with a parent, and 30.9% school. The majority of preschoolers were classified as having a healthy body weight (92.5% of 3- and 4-year-olds; 74.2% of 5-year-olds), 46.3% of the participants’ families had a household income of CAD 80,000 or higher, and 83.9% had a highest household education level of post-secondary. See Table 1 for a complete accounting of the participants’ demographics.
Table 1.
Selected characteristics of preschooler participants and for boys and girls separately.
| Full sample (n = 650) |
Boys (n = 330) |
Girls (n = 319) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 3 | 225 | 34.6 | 114 | 34.6 | 110 | 34.6 |
| 4 | 206 | 31.7 | 102 | 30.8 | 104 | 32.6 |
| 5 | 219 | 33.8 | 114 | 34.6 | 105 | 32.9 |
| Household income | ||||||
| CAD0–CAD39,999 | 157 | 24.2 | 102 | 31.0 | 55 | 17.1 |
| CAD40,000–CAD79,000 | 192 | 29.5 | 86 | 26.1 | 106 | 33.1 |
| CAD80,000 or higher | 301 | 46.3 | 142 | 42.9 | 159 | 49.8 |
| Highest household education | ||||||
| Secondary school or less | 102 | 16.2 | 50 | 15.9 | 51 | 16.4 |
| Postsecondary completed | 527 | 83.9 | 266 | 84.1 | 262 | 83.6 |
| Body weight statusa | ||||||
| Ages 3 and 4 | ||||||
| Healthy weight | 399 | 92.5 | – | – | – | – |
| Overweight/obesity | 32 | 7.5 | – | – | – | – |
| Age 5 | ||||||
| Healthy weight | 161 | 74.2 | – | – | – | – |
| Overweight/obesity | 56 | 25.8 | – | – | – | – |
| Childcare type attended | ||||||
| Center-based | 179 | 27.5 | 82 | 24.9 | 97 | 30.2 |
| Home-based | 62 | 9.5 | 37 | 11.1 | 25 | 7.9 |
| At home with parent/guardian | 209 | 32.1 | 112 | 34.0 | 96 | 30.1 |
| School | 200 | 30.9 | 99 | 30.0 | 101 | 31.8 |
Notes: Some values shown in the table may not add up to 100% owing to weighting and some individuals chose not to answer certain questions; n values may differ across tables owing to weighting and bootstrap techniques; center-based childcare is a daycare, nursey school or preschool; stayed at home means the child stayed at home with parent, guardian or other caregiver.
Defined according to the World Health Organization criteria.33
– Means data not releasable owing to small sample size.
2.2. Measurement tools
The 3 components of CHMS protocol included: an interview in the participant's own home, a visit to a mobile examination center to have physical measurements taken, and wearing an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days.24
The in-person interview, via parent report, collected demographic and childcare type information. Response options for the question about childcare arrangement included 6 options: (1) daycare center, (2) home-based daycare, (3) nursery school or preschool, (4) school (including kindergarten), (5) stayed at home with parent, guardian or caregiver, and (6) receive any other type of childcare (e.g., day camp).24 Parents were asked to select all of the childcare venues that their child(ren) attended in the last month (multiple response options). For the purpose of this study, participants were collapsed into 4 childcare type categories: (1) daycare center, nursery school or preschool, (2) home-based daycare, (3) school (including kindergarten), or (4) stayed at home with parent, guardian or caregiver.
During the visit to the mobile examination center, height and weight were objectively measured. A fixed stadiometer with a vertical backboard and moveable headboard was used for measuring height, and a Mettler Toldeo digital scale (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) following the Canadian Physical Activity, Fitness, and Lifestyle Approach protocol was used for measuring weight.23 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using percentiles in line with the World Health Organization's BMI-for-age growth references.25
Actical accelerometers (Phillips, Respironics, Bend, OR, USA; dimensions: 2.8 cm × 2.7 cm × 1.0 cm, weight: 17 g) were programmed to start collecting data at midnight after the participant left the mobile examination center. Participants wore the monitor on their right hip on an elasticized belt during their waking hours (excluding water time) for 7 consecutive days. Although participants wore the Actical for 7 days, the device only has memory capacity for approximately 5.5 days when 15-s epoch lengths are used;18 therefore, data for Days 6 and 7 were not available.
Using a prepaid envelope, monitors were returned to Statistics Canada to download the collected data. For the preschool age group, a valid day was defined as 5 or more hours of monitor wear time,26 and participants were required to have at least 3 valid days for the data to be included.27 Non-wear time consisted of 60 min of consecutive 0 count, with allowance for 1 min or 2 min of counts between 0 and 100. After invalid days were removed from the dataset, daily time spent at various activity intensities (i.e., light PA (LPA), MVPA, TPA, and ST) was determined for valid days based on laboratory-derived cut-points corresponding to each intensity level.28, 29 Adolph et al.’s28 preschooler-specific PA cut-point for MVPA (288 cp15s) was used, and Wong et al.’s29 cut-point for differentiating sedentary behavior from LPA (25 cp15s) and for measuring TPA was applied.
2.3. Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed in SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and were based on weighted data for the combined CHMS Cycle 3 and Cycle 4 accelerometry data, as per Statistics Canada requirements. To explore participant demographics, descriptive statistics were generated. To compare activity levels by childcare type, population means, standard errors, confidence intervals (CIs) and sample totals were calculated to estimate average daily and hourly rates of activity (LPA, MVPA, TPA, and ST) by childcare type for the entire sample, and again by sex. Standard errors and CIs were estimated with bootstrap resampling methods, using bootstrap weights provided by Statistics Canada. These weights account for the characteristics of CHMS sample design, such as stratification, clustering and multi-stage sampling. Hourly rates of activity were calculated by dividing average total daily activity by average wear time, for each intensity. Alpha level was set at 0.05 to produce 95%CIs.
3. Results
Daily rates of habitual MVPA and TPA varied across the 4 childcare settings. They ranged from 65.99 min/day to 74.62 min/day and 274.20 min/day to 281.66 min/day, respectively, while ST ranged from 443.13 min/day to 460.57 min/day (Table 2). No significant differences were observed for the full sample, nor were significant differences observed in boys or girls separately in daily rates of each activity level (LPA, MVPA, TPA, and ST) across the 4 childcare settings.
Table 2.
Average daily PA and ST, by childcare type, among Canadian preschoolers and for boys and girls separately.
| LPA |
MVPA |
TPA |
ST |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | min/day | SE | 95%CI | min/day | SE | 95%CI | min/day | SE | 95%CI | min/day | SE | 95%CI | |
| Total | |||||||||||||
| Center-based | 223 | 208.21* | 4.80 | 198.78–217.64 | 65.99* | 2.33 | 61.40–70.57 | 274.20* | 6.20 | 262.02–286.39 | 450.63* | 6.99 | 436.89–464.37 |
| Home-based | 66 | 203.02* | 4.83 | 193.54–212.51 | 74.26* | 4.99 | 64.46–84.05 | 277.28* | 9.01 | 259.58–294.98 | 444.81* | 13.08 | 419.12–470.50 |
| Stayed home | 165 | 206.85* | 7.89 | 191.36–222.35 | 73.46* | 3.82 | 65.95–80.96 | 280.31* | 10.77 | 259.14–301.47 | 443.13* | 8.46 | 426.51–459.74 |
| School | 196 | 207.04* | 4.89 | 197.44–216.65 | 74.62* | 2.25 | 70.19–79.05 | 281.66* | 6.26 | 269.37–293.95 | 460.57* | 9.78 | 441.35–479.78 |
| Boys | |||||||||||||
| Center-based | 106 | 206.72* | 8.86 | 189.30–224.13 | 67.13* | 3.61 | 60.04–74.22 | 273.84* | 11.79 | 250.69–297.00 | 456.36* | 9.67 | 437.36–475.36 |
| Home-based | 30 | 200.94* | 7.39 | 186.42–215.46 | 74.98* | 7.64 | 59.98–89.98 | 275.92* | 13.71 | 248.98–302.85 | 451.41* | 19.67 | 412.77–490.05 |
| Stayed home | 92 | 199.77* | 8.76 | 182.56–216.98 | 75.66* | 4.89 | 66.05–85.27 | 275.43* | 12.66 | 250.56–300.31 | 436.44* | 13.33 | 410.24–462.63 |
| School | 92 | 217.14* | 11.39 | 194.76–239.51 | 80.93* | 4.20 | 72.68–89.19 | 298.07* | 14.73 | 269.13–327.01 | 457.39* | 17.80 | 422.42–492.36 |
| Girls | |||||||||||||
| Center-based | 117 | 209.49* | 4.73 | 200.21–218.78 | 65.02* | 2.52 | 60.06–69.97 | 274.51* | 5.39 | 263.92–285.10 | 445.74* | 11.58 | 422.99–468.50 |
| Home-based | 36 | 206.04* | 5.17 | 195.89–216.20 | 73.21* | 6.88 | 59.69–86.73 | 279.25* | 11.13 | 257.39–301.12 | 435.24* | 16.17 | 403.48–467.01 |
| Stayed home | 73 | 215.13* | 9.10 | 197.26–233.00 | 70.88* | 4.69 | 61.67–80.09 | 286.01* | 12.22 | 262.00–310.01 | 450.95* | 10.37 | 430.57–471.32 |
| School | 104 | 197.19* | 6.05 | 185.29–209.08 | 68.45* | 4.03 | 60.54–76.37 | 265.64* | 9.79 | 246.40–284.87 | 463.67* | 9.17 | 445.66–481.68 |
Note: Variation in sample size due to weighting and missing data; n values may differ across tables owing to weighting and bootstrap techniques.
p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: Center-based childcare = daycare, nursey school or preschool; CI = confidence interval; LPA = light physical activity; MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; PA = physical activity; SE = standard error; ST = sedentary time; Stayed home = stayed at home with parent, guardian, or other caregiver; TPA = total physical activity.
Hourly rates of MVPA and TPA ranged from 5.48 min/h to 6.18 min/h and 22.69 min/h to 23.21 min/h, respectively, while ST ranged from 36.80 min/h to 37.31 min/h (Table 3). No significant differences were observed for mean hourly rates of the various activity intensities across the 4 childcare venues.
Table 3.
Average hourly PA and ST, by childcare type, among Canadian preschoolers and for boys and girls separately.
| LPA |
MVPA |
TPA |
ST |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | min/h | SE | 95%CI | min/h | SE | 95%CI | min/h | SE | 95%CI | min/h | SE | 95%CI | |
| Total | |||||||||||||
| Center based | 223 | 17.22* | 0.31 | 16.61–17.82 | 5.48* | 0.19 | 5.10–5.85 | 22.69* | 0.41 | 21.89–23.50 | 37.31* | 0.41 | 36.50–38.12 |
| Home based | 66 | 16.90* | 0.44 | 16.04–17.77 | 6.18* | 0.42 | 5.36–7.00 | 23.08* | 0.79 | 21.52–24.64 | 36.92* | 0.79 | 35.36–38.48 |
| Stayed home | 165 | 17.11* | 0.43 | 16.27–17.95 | 6.10* | 0.30 | 5.52–6.68 | 23.21* | 0.65 | 21.94–24.48 | 36.80* | 0.65 | 35.53–38.08 |
| School | 196 | 16.73* | 0.31 | 16.11–17.34 | 6.08* | 0.22 | 5.65–6.52 | 22.81* | 0.41 | 22.00–23.61 | 37.19* | 0.41 | 36.39–38.00 |
| Boys | |||||||||||||
| Center based | 106 | 16.87* | 0.36 | 16.17–17.57 | 5.51* | 0.21 | 5.10–5.93 | 22.38* | 0.47 | 21.46–23.31 | 37.62* | 0.47 | 36.69–38.55 |
| Home based | 30 | 16.59* | 0.63 | 15.36–17.82 | 6.18* | 0.65 | 4.90–7.47 | 22.78* | 1.20 | 20.43–25.12 | 37.22* | 1.20 | 34.87–39.57 |
| Stayed home | 92 | 16.83* | 0.50 | 15.84–17.83 | 6.39* | 0.40 | 5.60–7.18 | 23.23* | 0.83 | 21.59–24.86 | 36.78* | 0.83 | 35.15–38.42 |
| School | 92 | 17.18* | 0.70 | 15.81–18.55 | 6.51* | 0.32 | 5.89–7.13 | 23.69* | 0.85 | 22.02–25.37 | 36.31* | 0.85 | 34.64–37.98 |
| Girls | |||||||||||||
| Center based | 117 | 17.51* | 0.52 | 16.50–18.53 | 5.44* | 0.24 | 4.98–5.91 | 22.96* | 0.64 | 21.71–24.21 | 37.05* | 0.64 | 35.80–38.30 |
| Home-based | 36 | 17.36* | 0.50 | 16.38–18.34 | 6.17* | 0.55 | 5.09–7.24 | 23.53* | 0.96 | 21.64–25.41 | 36.48* | 0.96 | 34.59–38.37 |
| Stayed home | 73 | 17.43* | 0.55 | 16.36–18.50 | 5.75* | 0.35 | 5.07–6.43 | 23.18* | 0.76 | 21.69–24.67 | 36.83* | 0.76 | 35.34–38.32 |
| School | 104 | 16.28* | 0.42 | 15.46–17.10 | 5.66* | 0.31 | 5.06–6.27 | 21.94* | 0.69 | 20.59–23.30 | 38.05* | 0.69 | 36.69–39.41 |
Note: Variation in sample size owing to weighting and missing data; n values may differ across tables owing to weighting and bootstrap techniques.
p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: Center-based childcare = daycare, nursey school or preschool; CI = confidence interval; LPA = light physical activity; MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; PA = physical activity; SE = standard error; ST = sedentary time; Stayed home = stayed at home with parent, guardian, or other caregiver; TPA = total physical activity.
Levels of PA and ST for both daily and hourly rates of activity were similar for boys and for girls. Most noteworthy was that boys had the most MVPA (80.93 min/day; 6.51 min/h) and TPA (298.07 min/day; 23.69 min/h) in school for both daily and hourly rates of activity, whereas girls had the most MVPA in home-based settings (73.21 min/day; 6.17 min/h) for daily and hourly rates of activity, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). Girls had the most TPA when in the stayed-at-home category (286.01 min/day; Table 2) for daily rates of activity and when in the home-based childcare category (23.53 min/h; Table 3) for hourly rates of activity.
For daily rates of activity, boys and girls had the most ST at school (457.39 min/day and 463.67 min/day, respectively) (Table 2). For hourly rates of activity, boys had the most ST in center-based childcare (37.62 min/day), whereas girls still had the most ST at school (38.05 min/day) (Table 3).
4. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to explore the habitual (i.e., full day) PA levels and ST of Canadian preschoolers who attended a variety of childcare types. Although no significant differences were found in activity levels for preschoolers enrolled in each of the 4 childcare types (daycare, preschool or nursery school; home-based childcare; stayed at home with parent, guardian or other caregiver; school), this study is the first of its kind to examine childcare status among a representative sample of the Canadian population. Although the daily and hourly rates were both explored, the hourly rate accounts for participants’ wear time and therefore may provide a more accurate picture of activity intensities in childcare facilities.
When examining hourly rates of activity among this age cohort (3–5 years old), Pate et al.30 found lower levels of LPA and higher levels of MVPA than we found in our study for both genders together and for boys and girls separately. The levels of LPA and MVPA for both boys and girls together in Pate et al.’s study was 10.5 and 7.7 min/h, respectively.30 This varies from our range of activity levels for LPA (16.73–17.22 min/h) and MVPA (5.48–6.18 min/h) across the 4 childcare types. However, Pate et al.’s participants had a lower average wear time (4.4 h)30 than our participants had (approximately 12 h).
Previous research has noted that higher rates of MVPA are found among preschoolers enrolled in school.11 Vanderloo et al.11 found that preschoolers in school had significantly more MVPA (3.33 min/h) than preschoolers in center-based daycare (1.58 min/h) or home-based daycare (1.74 min/h). In general, participants in our study had much higher rates of MVPA (5.48–6.18 min/h) than participants in the various childcare settings in the study by Vanderloo et al. (1.58–3.33 min/h).11 Although both studies used Actical accelerometers to measure activity levels, this variation could be a consequence of the cut-points applied in each of the studies; Vanderloo et al.11 used higher cut-points validated by Pfeiffer et al.26 (LPA – 50 cp15s, MVPA – 715 cp15s), whereas in our study we used lower cut-points (consistent with other CHMS studies) provided by Adolph et al.28 (2012; MVPA – 288 cp15s) and Wong et al.29 (2011; LPA – 25 cp15s).
In the 2004 study by Pate et al.,30 ST levels were also considerably higher than those found in our study. They found ST to be 42.1 min/h for both genders together, whereas we found ST to range from 36.80 min/h to 37.31 min/h.30 Again, differences in ST could be attributed to differences in participants’ average wear time (4.4 h/day in Pate et al.’s study and approximately 12 h/day in ours).30
While previous research has noted that preschoolers enrolled center-based daycare have higher rates of ST (41.62 min/h) compared to young children in other early learning environments,8 the current study found no statistically different rates of ST across all childcare venues. Generally, higher rates of ST were found in Tucker et al.’s study than in the current study (39.68–41.62 min/h vs. 36.80–37.31 min/h, respectively).8 In the studies by Vanderloo et al.6 and by Tucker et al.,8 participants wore accelerometers during childcare hours only, whereas the CHMS participants in the present study wore accelerometers during all waking hours, resulting in more wear time (approximately 12 h) among the CHMS participants in the present study than among the participants in the other studies (approximately 7 h). Having children wear the device during childcare hours only is more indicative of true differences in activity levels while at childcare, because activity that occurs before and after childcare hours is not reported. (The purpose of the CHMS data is to provide national surveillance data on Canadian health topics; thus, activity levels are monitored for the full day.) However, the CHMS data allow us to examine whether habitual (daily) activity levels differ for preschoolers enrolled in different types of facilities. No statistically significant differences were found in activity levels regardless of childcare type, however, which suggests that children whose parents enroll them in childcare and kindergarten do not differ in activity levels from children whose parents choose to keep them at home. In addition, we found no significant differences in the activity levels of boys or girls who attended different childcare settings.
It will not be possible to explore PA levels and ST with consideration to both childcare type and age until another cycle of CHMS is released and a larger sample size is available. Nevertheless, this should be an important research focus in the future, in that Ellis et al.4 found that toddlers (<3 years old) spent significantly more time in activity (intensity not specified) than did preschoolers (>3 years old). On the other hand, Vanderloo et al.11 found increased rates of MVPA in school, a common venue for older preschoolers. This could be caused by the improved motor skills of older preschoolers and by the fact that they potentially have more accessibility to play equipment and exposure to organized activities. Grontved et al.31 lent support to this argument when they found that children who were 3–4 years old spent less time in MVPA and had decreased TPA than children who were 4–5 years old or 5–6 years old. While children in childcare are within a narrow age range (typically 1.0–4.9 years), significant development occurs during this time frame. Exploring the relationship between PA and childcare type while accounting for age is an important next step in research on this topic.
Although this study helps us understand the association between habitual PA and ST among preschoolers who attend various childcare environments across Canada, some limitations should be noted. First, a number of potential participants (n = 172) were enrolled in multiple childcare arrangements (e.g., they attended daycare centers and stayed at home with a parent). This would convolute the relationship between childcare enrollment and PA levels; therefore, these children were excluded from our analyses. Additionally, the geographic origin of the participants was unknown, and no data were collected from 3 Canadian territories. Because each province has differing childcare policies regarding PA and outdoor time13 (which has been strongly correlated with increased PA among this population),12 childcare venues included in the same category (e.g., daycare) may have followed different policies or standards, thus skewing the data. Moreover, no information was available on the characteristics (e.g., quality of the childcare setting or hours of operation) of the childcare venues attended by study participants, which, again, has been found to influence PA levels.11, 32 Finally, participants began using the accelerometer the day after their visit to the medical examination center. Since not all participants visited the medical examination center on the same day, it is possible that the data analyzed in the current study included weekend data for some children and weekday only data for others. This is problematic because children do not typically attend childcare on weekend days, so this may have contaminated the effect being explored in this study.
5. Conclusion
No significant differences were observed in preschoolers’ habitual PA levels and ST across 4 childcare arrangements in Canada. However, this study helps provide a better understanding of PA and ST among preschoolers in childcare in Canada and supports the belief that preschoolers who stay at home with a parent engage in the same activity levels as those enrolled in center- and home-based childcare and kindergarten. Future exploration is needed on the ways that childcare arrangements vary (e.g., in programming, policies, and environments) across Canada, as well their subsequent impact on preschoolers’ daytime activity levels, in order to guide decision makers in creating policies related to PA and ST in Canadian childcare. Moreover, it is important to explore the impact on PA levels and ST when preschoolers have more than one childcare status or when they stay at home with a parent or guardian, given the strong influence that both parents and childcare providers have on young children's activity affordances. This study begins that process by providing a depiction of PA levels and ST among Canadian preschoolers enrolled in common childcare venues, both during and outside of childcare hours.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Nathalie Goodwin, Tina Luu Ly, and Glenda Babe for their assistance in accessing the CHMS data. Brian Timmons is the Canada Research Chair in Pediatric Exercise Medicine. Patricia Tucker is supported by an Early Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.
Authors’ contributions
PT conceived the study, completed all study-related analyses, drafted the first version of the manuscript, assisted with methodology and data analysis, and reviewed all drafts of the manuscript; JS, with the assistance of PW, BWT, RC and PT, completed all study-related analyses and drafted the first version of the manuscript; PW assisted with data analysis and provided manuscript feedback; BWT provided manuscript feedback; RC assisted with methodology and data analysis and provided manuscript feedback. All authors contributed to the writing of this document and approve of the final version, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Shanghai University of Sport.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- 1.Uppal S. Employment patterns of families with children. Insights on Canadian Society. Available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2015001/article/14202-eng.pdf; 2015. [accessed 05.01.2018].
- 2.Cleveland G. New evidence about child care in Canada: use patterns, affordability, and quality. http://on-irpp.org/2eoJRTC IRPP Choices. Available at: 2008. [accessed 05.01.2018]
- 3.Sinha M. Child care in Canada. Statistics Canada. Available at: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-652-x/89-652-x2014005-eng.htm; 2014. [accessed 05.01.2018].
- 4.Ellis Y.G., Cliff D.P., Janssen X., Jones R.A., Reilly J.J., Okely A.D. Sedentary time, physical activity and compliance with IOM recommendations in young children at childcare. Prev Med Rep. 2017;7:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Henderson K.E., Grode G.M., O'Connell M.L., Schwartz M.B. Environmental factors associated with physical activity in childcare centers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:43. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0198-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P., Johnson A.M., van Zandvoort M.M., Burke S.M., Irwin J.D. The influence of centre-based childcare on preschoolers’ physical activity levels: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:1794–1802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110201794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuzik N., Clark D., Ogden N., Harber V., Carson V. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of toddlers and preschoolers in child care centres in Alberta, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2015;106:e178–e183. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tucker P., Vanderloo L.M., Burke S.M., Irwin J.D., Johnson A.M. Prevalence and influences of preschoolers’ sedentary behaviors in early learning centers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:128. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0441-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sallis J.F., Patterson T.L., McKenzie T.L., Nader P.R. Family variables and physical activity in preschool children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1988;9:57–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P., Ismail A., van Zandvroort M.M. Physical activity opportunities in Canadian childcare facilities: a provincial/territorial review of legislation. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:461–472. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.4.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P., Johnson A.M., Burke S.M., Irwin J.D. Environmental influences on preschoolers’ physical activity levels in various early-learning facilities. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015;86:360–370. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1053105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P., Johnson A.M., Holmes J.D. Physical activity among preschoolers during indoor and outdoor childcare play periods. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013;38:1173–1175. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P. Physical activity and sedentary behavior legislation in Canadian childcare facilities: an update. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:475. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5292-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cardon G., De Bourdeaudhuij I. Are preschool children active enough? Objectively measured physical activity levels. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79:326–332. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reilly J.J. Low levels of objectively measured physical activity in preschoolers in child care. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:502–507. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cea100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tucker P. The physical activity levels of preschool-aged children: a systematic review. Early Child Res Q. 2008;23:547–558. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tucker P., Gilliland J. The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. Public Health. 2007;121:909–922. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chaput J.P., Colley R.C., Aubert S., Carson V., Janssen I., Roberts K.C. Proportion of preschool-aged children meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and associations with adiposity: results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(Suppl. 5):829. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4854-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colley R.C., Garriguet D., Adamo K.B., Carson V., Janssen I., Timmons B.W. Physical activity and sedentary behavior during the early years in Canada: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garriguet D., Carson V., Colley R.C., Janssen I., Timmons B.W., Tremblay M.S. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of Canadian children aged 3 to 5. Heal Reports. 2016;27:14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vanderloo L.M., Tucker P. Weekly trends in preschoolers’ physical activity and sedentary time in childcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:2454–2464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Day B., Langlois R., Tremblay M., Knoppers B. Canadian Health Measures Survey: ethical, legal and social issues. Heal Reports. 2007;(Suppl. 18):S37–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Statistics Canada. Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS): cycle 1 user guide. Available at: www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/document/5071_D2_T1_V1-eng.htm; 2011. [accessed 05.01.2018].
- 24.Statistics Canada. Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Available at: www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=5071#a; 2014. [accessed 05.01.2018].
- 25.Statistics Canada. Body mass index of children and youth, 2012 to 2013. Available at:https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-625-x/2014001/article/14105-eng.htm#n3; 2015. [accessed 05.01.2018].
- 26.Pfeiffer K.A., Dowda M., McIver K.L., Pate R.R. Factors related to objectively measured physical activity in preschool children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009;21:196–208. doi: 10.1123/pes.21.2.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang M., Bjornson K., Barreira T.V., Ragan B.G., Song K. The minimum number of days required to establish reliable physical activity estimates in children aged 2-15 years. Physiol Meas. 2014;35:2229–2237. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Adolph A.L., Puyau M.R., Vohra F.A., Nicklas T.A., Zakeri I.F., Butte N.F. Validation of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity in preschool children. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:944–953. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.7.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong S.L., Colley R., Connor Gorber S., Tremblay MS. Actical accelerometer sedentary activity thresholds for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:587–591. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.4.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pate RR., Pfeiffer K.A., Trost S.G., Ziegler P., Dowda M. Physical activity among children attending preschools. J Pediatr. 2004;114:1258–1263. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-1088-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grontved A., Pedersen G.S., Andersen L.B., Kristensen P.L., Moller N.C., Froberg K. Personal characteristics and demographic factors associated with objectively measured physical activity in children attending preschool. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009;21:209–219. doi: 10.1123/pes.21.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Finn K., Johannsen N., Specker B. Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children. J Pediatr. 2002;140:81–85. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.120693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.