Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2020 Oct 12;142:115687. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115687

ScxLin cells directly form a subset of chondrocytes in temporomandibular joint that are sharply increased in Dmp1-null mice

Chi Ma 1, Yan Jing 2,#, Hui Li 3, Ke Wang 3, Zheng Wang 3, Chunmei Xu 3, Xiaolin Sun 4, Deepak Kaji 5, Xianglong Han 6, Alice Huang 5, Jian Feng 3,#
PMCID: PMC7749445  NIHMSID: NIHMS1639987  PMID: 33059101

INTRODUCTION

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex skeletal structure that is essential for jaw movement in mammals 1. This joint is comprised of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, an articular disc and numerous tendons and ligaments 2,3 (two extremely similar connective tissues simply called tendon in this paper). The articular disc is dense fibrocartilaginous tissue rich in fibroblasts and type I collagen 4. The disc displacement is one of the most common causes for TMJ disorders which affects 5–10% of the population in the US 57. Yet, the cell origin of the disc is still unclear, which further increases the challenge to develop appropriate treatment strategies.

The condyle is covered by the mandibular condyle cartilage, which is considered as a fibrocartilage with well-organized cellular zones of maturation. These zones include a distinct fibrous layer followed by prechondroblastic layer, and chondrocytic layers including chondrocytes and hypertrophic chondrocytes 810. Similar to the disc, the fibrous zone contains fibroblasts as the primary cell type and an ECM (extracellular matrix) of dense, organized, type I collagen. The in vitro study suggested that the cells in the fibrous layer can give rise to mature chondrocytes 10. In contrast to large joints 11,12, the TMJ condyle has a unique prechondroblastic layer (also rich in type I collagen), although the cell source and biological function of this layer is largely unknown.

Cell transdifferentiation plays a critical role in skeletal formation 13. Our recent publications showed that up to 80% of the TMJ-ramus bone cells are chondrocyte-derived controlled by Wnt/β-catenin signaling 1416. This finding is similar to studies in limb development 13,1719. Similarly, fish tendon forms a fibrocartilaginous pad, followed by sesamoid bone formation under comprehensive loading 20. Furthermore, tendon calcifies in birds under tensile loadings 21,22. In humans, the calcific tendonitis occurs either through degenerative or reactive calcification 2326. However, it is largely unclear if tendon lineage contributes to TMJ formation.

DMP1 (dentin matrix protein 1), highly expressed in osteocytes that account for more than 90% of bone cells 2729, is critical for normal postnatal chondrogenesis and subsequent osteogenesis 30. DMP1 mutations in human 28,30 or Dmp1 deletion in mice 31 or rabbits 32 result in hypophosphatemic rickets caused by an increase of fibroblast growth factor 23 3335. Our recent studies demonstrated there is an acceleration of chondrogenesis and bone transdifferentiation from chondrocytes in hypophosphatemic rickets 36. However, some increased chondrocytes remained as cartilage cells and do not transdifferentiate into bone cells, resulting in more accumulated cartilage tissue. This finding raises a new puzzle: is there a special subset of chondrocytes that has a different origin and a different gene expression pattern from the perichondrium-derived chondrocytes?

Scleraxis (Scx), a transcriptional factor highly expressed in tendon cells, is essential for tendon development 26,3739. Currently there are two lineage tracing lines reported in literatures: ScxCreERT2 24 (widely used for studying the tendon fate during development) and Scx-Cre 40, although these tracing lines are mainly used for studying tendon formation and trauma reactions in limbs.

In this study, we attempted to address whether Scx lineage directly contributes to chondrogenesis in normal and diseased TMJ growth. Our findings suggest that Scx lineage directly contributes to disc formation, and forms a new subset of chondrocytes for the TMJ condyle, which is highly sensitive to a change in phosphorus levels as demonstrated in the Dmp1 KO mice (a hypophosphatemic rickets model).

METHOD

Mouse strains

For tendon-derived tracing studies, Scx-CreERT2 41 was crossed to R26RtdTomato (B6;129S6-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J, stock number: 009705) and named ScxLin. For chondrocyte-derived tracing studies, Acan-CreERT2 42 and Col10a1-Cre 43 were respectively crossed to R26RtdTomato, and named AcanLin and Col10a1Lin, respectively. For studying the impact of hypophosphatemia on cell fate, ScxLin was further crossed to Dmp1 KO mice 28, with the ScxLin; Dmp1+/− as the controls. For studying the impact of DTA-mediated ablation in tendon cells, R26RDTA mice (B6.129P2-Gt(ROSA) 26Sortm1(DTA)Lky/J, stock number: 009669) were crossed to ScxLin mice, with the ScxLin mice as the controls. Tamoxifen was injected to induce the CreERT2 activity. The tamoxifen powder (Sigma T5648) was dissolved in 10% ethanol and 90% corn oil (Sigma C8267) at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. A low dosage of 75 mg/kg was injected into mice intraperitoneally 14,15. Since the windows of time for bioactivity of tamoxifen and its metabolites are between 4–24 h 44, two types of injection strategies were applied: single injection was started at P3 for tracing the fate of the early ScxLin cells; and multiple injections were given twice per week for late recruitments studies. The validation of tamoxifen-negative controls for ScxLin was shown in Fig. S1.

All protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Texas A&M College of Dentistry.

Immunohistochemistry, H&E, Toluidine Blue, Safranin O Staining

The TMJs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and decalcified in 10% EDTA at 4°C, followed by either CryoJane frozen sections as previously described45 or embedded in paraffin, sectioned and stained with H&E, Safranin O (proteoglycans) or Toluidine blue stain46. Immunostaining was proceeded as previously described47 with the following antibodies: rabbit anti-aggrecan antibody (Abcam; 1:400), rabbit anti-DMP1 antibody (provided by Dr. Chunlin Qin at Texas A&M University, 1:400), rabbit anti-Collagen I antibody (Abcam; 1:100), rabbit anti-Sox9 antibody (Abcam; 1:100), rabbit anti-Collagen X antibody (Abcam; 1:200), rabbit anti-MEPE antibody (Kerafast, 1:100). The immunofluorescent signals were detected with the corresponding Alexa second antibody (Thermofisher; 1:200) at room temperature for 2 hours.

Cell proliferation

To evaluate cell proliferation, 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) (Invitrogen A10044) dissolved in PBS was administered to mice at the indicated postnatal days 3 hours before sacrifice. Click-iT Imaging Kit with Alexa Flour 488-azide (Invitrogen, C10337) or Alexa Flour 647-azide (A10277) was used to detect EdU in cryosections15,48.

TEM

TMJ condyles were excised and fixed for several days in 1.5% glutaraldehyde/1.5% formaldehyde, rinsed, then decalcified in 0.2 M EDTA with 50 mM TRIS in a laboratory microwave (Ted Pella, Inc) operated at 97.5 watts for fifteen, 99 min cycles. Samples were fixed again in 1.5% glutaraldehyde/1.5% formaldehyde with 0.05% tannic acid overnight, then rinsed and post-fixed overnight in 1% OsO4. Samples were dehydrated and extensively infiltrated in Spurr’s epoxy and polymerized at 70 °C49. One-micron thick sections stained with an epoxy tissue stain (Electron Microscopy Sciences) were used to identify regions of interest. Ultrathin sections containing ROI were cut at 80 nm, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and imaged using a FEI G20 TEM operated at 120 kV with montages collected using an AMT XR-41 2 × 2K camera. The acquired images were stitched using ImageJ software50.

Tissue clearing, Confocal microscopy and Image analysis

10-week mandibular condyles from Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato with Dmp1 KO or Dmp1 +/− background were used for 3-D reconstruction images, and movies were collected. Tissue clearing was performed on these samples with the PEGASOS method as previously described 51. Fluorescence cell images were captured using SP5 Leica confocal microscope. All images were obtained at light ranging from 488 (green) to 647 (red) μm. Multiple stacked images were taken at 200Hz (1024×1024) and shot in 10X, 20X and 63X objectives 52. For tissue clearing samples, red Tomato reporter represented ScxLin cells. Image processing, 3-D reconstruction images, and movies were used with Image J software and Imaris 9.0 (Bitplane) 52. For IHC staining, red Tomato reporter represented the Cre event and the daughter cells they derived; the green color indicated the corresponding marker for immunostaining. Cells were counted using NIH ImageJ software.

Statistical Analysis

All data were reported as mean (SD). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences among samples (n=4). The Mann-Whitney U test (post hoc test) was used to compare differences between the mutant and age-matched control groups (n=4). Significance level was defined as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

RESULTS

The prechondroblastic layer has a unique feature of cell morphology and fiber distribution

One of the most unique features of the TMJ condyle is its prechondroblastic layer, which is between the fibrous and chondrocyte layers (Fig.S2A) and expresses both cartilage and bone markers 53,54. The representative TEM image (Fig.1A) of the TMJ condyle from a 3-week old mouse exhibited a distinctive ultrastructural feature of the prechondroblast compared with the fibroblast (flat with dendrites) and chondrocyte (round and surrounded by lacunae) as below: 1) irregular cell shape with prominent dendrites the size of which gradually reduced during postnatal growth; 2) rich collagen fibers either in fibril bundles (yellow dashed circles) or loosely distributed format in ECMs, which gradually disappeared in the cartilage layer; 3) active cell proliferation as indicated by red dashed circles; and 4) lack of lacunae (white dashed circles), which were gradually formed along with chondrogenesis (Fig.1AB). The non-decalcified Safranin O staining for a 2-week old mouse condyle cartilage displayed a transition from the fibrous layer to the prechondroblastic layer followed by the chondrocytic layer (Fig.S2B). The H&E images also showed a gradual reduction in the thickness of the prechondroblastic layer from P49 to 8-months (Fig.S2C). Similarly, the prechondroblastic layer was demonstrated in rabbit (Fig.S3A) and human cadaver TMJ condyles (Fig.S3B) in a corresponding style as shown in mice, indicating a progressive transition from fibroblasts to chondrocytes via a prechondroblast step is likely a universal event in other species.

Fig. 1. There are unique features of the TMJ prechondroblastic layer in cell morphology and fiber distribution.

Fig. 1

A) The TEM image from a P21 WT mouse condyle displayed unique features of prechondroblasts, which includes dendritic cell shapes, a transition of ECM environment from fibril bundle (yellow dashed circle, FB) to collagen fibers (CF) and to lacuna (L, white dotted lines), and active cell proliferation (blue dotted lines), compared to the other two layers in condyle cartilage. B) A summarized cartoon indicates dual transition from flat fibrous cell to dendritic prechondroblasts and then round chondrocytes along with the changes in ECM environment. F: fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white solid lines: boundaries between each layer.

ScxLin directly contributes to growth and modeling of the TMJ disc and condyle during entire postnatal development

To trace the ScxLin cell fate, the Scx-CreERT2 mice were crossed with R26RtdTomato. Single tamoxifen injection was given at P3 and mice were harvested at P4, P9, P33 and P60, respectively. At P4, there were very few ScxLin cells in the fibrous and prechondroblastic layers, whereas more ScxLin cells were detected in the TMJ disc (Fig.2A). At P9, there were even more ScxLin cells identified in the disc, fibrous and prechondroblastic layers with few in the chondrocyte layer (Fig.2B). By P33 (i.e., 4-weeks after induction), there was an expansion of ScxLin cells into cell clusters, which spread from the condyle surface to a deeper portion of the cartilage. The representative immunofluorescent confocal image exhibited overlapping of Sox9 (a key transcription factor for chondrogenesis) and ScxLin cells (yellow color; Fig.2C, right panel), supporting a cell transdifferentiation from the initially labelled fibroblast cell (Sox9) to the Sox9+ chondrocytes. At P60, more ScxLin clusters were documented with Sox9 expressed in their nuclei (Fig.2D). The quantitation data showed a gradual increase of the ScxLin cells number in both the disc (~50% of cell populations) and condyle cartilage (~18% of the cell populations) from P4 to P60 (Fig.2E). The EdU labelled ScxLin cells counted for 6.6 % of the cell population in P19 condyles (Fig.2F), suggesting a low proliferation rate.

Fig. 2. A set of early labeled ScxLin cells contribute to late condyle head expansion.

Fig. 2

A) At P4 (one day after injection of tamoxifen) few ScxLin cells were observed in the fibrous layer with no Sox9 expression (right panel). B) At P9, more ScxLin cells were shown in the fibrous layer, in which there was no Sox9 expression (right panel). C) At P33, some ScxLin cells in the fibrous layer continuously differentiated into prechondroblasts and chondrocytes with Sox9 expressed in the nuclei (right panel). D) At P60, more ScxLin cells accumulated into clusters that extended from fibrous to chondrocytic layers with Sox9 expression in nuclei (right panel). E) The quantitation data showed that the percentage of ScxLin cells in disc and condyle cartilage gradually increased from P9 to P60. F) At P19, 6.6 % ScxLin cells in condyle cartilage were EdU positive (n=4). D, disc. * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001

Next, we set out to investigate the functional importance of ScxLin in TMJ growth. A 30-day inducible cell ablation experiment (from P3 to P33 with single tamoxifen injection at P3) was performed using ScxLin as the control, and ScxLin; R26RDTA (carrying a loxP-flanked stop cassette associated with an attenuated DT for the ablation of cells when Cre is active) as the ablation group. The tracing results revealed a great reduction in the number of ScxLin cells in the ablation group (Fig.3A, lower) compared to the control (Fig.3A, upper). The quantitation data showed an over 50% decrease of the red cells in the ablation group, which is significant between these two groups (Fig.3B). Together, the above data supports a notion that ScxLin cells are largely quiescent at the early developmental stage but rapidly expand during late development.

Fig. 3. There is a sharp reduction of ScxLin cells in the DTA group.

Fig. 3

A) DTA-mediated ablation of ScxLin cells (induction at P3 and sacrifice at P33) led to fewer red cells in TMJ condyle compared to the control group. B) There was a more than 50% reduction in the percentage of ScxLin cells in the DTA condyles compared to the controls, which is significant between these two groups (P < 0.01).

ScxLin cells are continuously recruited during TMJ expansion

In contrast to the growth plate, TMJ condyle growth starts late and continues to expand from a carrot shape to a mushroom-like structure under the mechanical stimulation during postnatal growth 5557. Additionally, the condylar fibrous layer remains active in mouse (Fig.S2) and human (Fig.S3B). Importantly, one-time tracing data showed a gradual increase of ScxLin cells in condylar expansion when mice start to be more active in mastication (Fig.2). Next, we asked whether there is a continuous recruitment of ScxLin cells during TMJ condylar expansion. To test this hypothesis, we did multiple injections of tamoxifen at two age groups as below.

First, we did multiple injections of tamoxifen into ScxLin mice two times/week starting from P3 and harvested them at P21. The cell lineage tracing data showed a more and broad distribution of ScxLin cells in all three layers (Fig.4A) compared to a single injection experiment (Fig.2). The tracing data also showed a change in cell shape from flat in the fibrous layer to dendritic in the prechondroblastic layer, followed by a round shape in the chondrocytic layer. The quantitation data (the ratio of ScxLin cells/DAPI+ cells) revealed that 91% of cells in the disc and fibrous layers, 67% in the prechondroblastic layer, and 31% in the chondrocytic layer were ScxLin derived (Fig.4B). The strong expressions of Sox9 and Aggrecan in the ScxLin cells within the chondrocytic layer further confirmed the transdifferentiation into cartilage cells, whereas the Col 1 expression was limited in the fibrous and prechondroblastic layers (Fig.4C).

Fig. 4. ScxLin cells are continuously recruited during TMJ condylar expansion.

Fig. 4

A) A confocal view of a 3-week-old TMJ (induced at P3 with two tamoxifen injections each week) revealed a strong Tomato signaling (low magnification, left panel; high magnification, right panel), indicating a transition from fibroblasts to prechondroblasts and chondrocytes. B) The quantitation data showed that over 90% cells in both disc and fibrous layers, 67% in prechondroblastic layer, and 31% in chondrocytic layer were from ScxLin. C) Co-immunostaining with Sox9 (left), aggrecan (middle) and Col 1 (right) showed a distinct feature of ScxLin cells in the TMJ condyle. D-E) Late activation of ScxLin (induced at P28 with two tamoxifen injections each week and harvested at P42) showed a continuous recruitment of ScxLin cells (D), some of which were Sox9+ chondrocytes (E, arrows). F) The quantitation results showed that 53% cells in disc and 22% in the condyle cartilage were ScxLin cells. F: fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white solid lines: boundaries between each layer.

Second, we activated the Scx-CreERT2 event with two times of tamoxifen injections each week from P28 to P42. The ScxLin cells were found in the disc and all three layers of the condyle cartilage (Fig.4D). Some of the ScxLin cells expressed Sox9 in the chondrocyte zone, confirming the transdifferentiation from Scx+ fibroblasts into chondrocytes (Fig.4E). The quantitation data showed that 53% of cells in the disc and 22% in the condyle cartilage originated from ScxLin (Fig.4F), supporting the notion that ScxLin cells contribute to TMJ expansion during the entire postnatal development.

ScxLin chondrocytes do not transdifferentiate into bone cells

Previously, we reported over 70% of the bone cells in TMJ condyle ramus were transdifferentiated from Aggrecan+ (AcanLin) chondrocytes 14. Here we asked whether the ScxLin chondrocytes follow the suit as the AcanLin does by comparing these two tracing lines at two age groups (P30 and P60). Both Cre lines received single tamoxifen induction at P3 and co-immunostained with DMP1 (a bone marker). There was a progressive increase in the tomato signal from P30 to P60 with a much lower level in the ScxLin (Fig.5AB, left panels) and a very high level in the AcanLin (Fig.5AB, right panels). There were essentially no red bone cells in the ScxLin subchondral bone, whereas most osteoblasts (OBs) and osteocytes (OCYs) were derived from the AcanLin chondrocytes. This information supports the notion that the ScxLin chondrocyte does not transdifferentiate into bone cells as the AcanLin chondrocyte does.

Fig. 5. There is a lack of transdifferentiation from ScxLin chondrocytes into subchondral bone cells during TMJ condyle growth (one-time tamoxifen induced at P3 with animals sacrificed at P30 and P60, respectively).

Fig. 5

A) There was a progressive increase in ScxLin chondrocytes from P33 to P60 but no Dmp1+/Scx+ bone cells in the subchondral bone, although there were some Scx+ fibroblasts in the bone marrow with no Dmp1+ ECM surrounding. B) Many AcanLin chondrocytes rapidly transdifferentiated into osteoblasts (Ob) and osteocytes (Ocy) with high level of Dmp1 in the surrounded ECM in both age groups.

A low phosphorus level accelerates ScxLin derived chondrogenesis

Our recent studies 36 showed a disproportional increase of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in Dmp1 KO condyles (i.e., some increased chondrocytes remained as cartilage cells and do not transdifferentiate into bone cells, resulting in more accumulated cartilage tissue). To address this puzzle, we first confirmed a greater increase in cartilage mass verse bone volume in the Dmp1 KO TMJ condyle using classical histology assays at different growth timelines (P10, P21, P49, and P60) (Fig.S4AB). Next, we showed a great expansion in the fibrous layer and rapid transitions from prechondroblastic cells to much enlarged hypertrophic chondrocytes at TEM level (Fig.S4C). The chondrocyte tracing studies using Col10a1Lin displayed a drastic increase of Aggrecan expression in both Col10a1Lin and non-Col10al derived chondrocytes plus a moderate increase in osteogenesis compared to the age matched control (Fig.S4D). This disproportional increase of cartilage mass indicates that some of the increased chondrocytes are likely derived from ScxLin cells, which do not transdifferentiate into bone cells (Fig.5).

To test this hypothesis, Dmp1 KO and ScxLin mice were internally crossed, which were induced at P3 and harvested at P70. The snapshot of 3D images from a tissue clearance treated control TMJ condyle (with an approximate 100 μm thickness) showed that the ScxLin cells were mainly distributed in fibrous and prechondroblastic layers with few in the chondrocyte layer (Fig.6A, left panels). In the KO ScxLin mice, there was a sharp increase in the number of ScxLin cells in all three layers of the condyle cartilage (Fig.6A, right panels). The enlarged confocal images clearly displayed multiple expanded ScxLin chondrocyte columns (or clusters) in the KO (Fig.6B, right panel). The quantitative data confirmed that this 2.5-fold increase in ScxLin cells in the KO condyle cartilage versus the age-matched control is statistically significant (Fig.6C, n=4; left panel). Additional analyses of immunostainings displayed a much higher level of aggrecan expression in the KO ScxLin chondrocytes (Fig.6D) and many more ScxLin hypertrophic chondrocytes expressing type X collagen versus the control mice (Fig.S5). However, there was no co-localization of ScxLin cells and MEPE+ bone cells in either the control (left panel) or KO (right panel) mice (Fig.6E). Thus, we conclude that it is the ScxLin chondrocyte that is responsible for an increase in the KO cartilage volume with no contribution to further cell transdifferentiation into bone cells.

Fig. A low phosphorus level accelerates tendon-derived chondrogenesis with no bone cell transdifferentiation.

Fig.

Fig.

A) The confocal images (~ 100 mm thickness) of the compound mice Dmp1 KO; Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato showed a drastic increase in the number of ScxLin in all layers of condyle cartilage (right panels). B) The enlarged confocal images revealed many round ScxLin-derived chondrocytes in columns originated from fibrous layer (right panels), whereas the tendon-derived cells remained low numbers in the controls (left panels). C) The quantitative data showed a significant increase in the number of ScxLin cells in condyle cartilage in the KO mice compared to the controls (n=4). D) A co-localization of Aggrecan and ScxLin signal images displayed a great increase in Aggrecan expression in the KO chondrocytes compared to the controls. E) MEPE immunostaining combined with ScxLin signal confirmed no bone cell transdifferentiation from the ScxLin derived chondrocyte in both the control and KO condyles. D: disc; white dotted line: the surface of condyle cartilage

DISCUSSION

The TMJ is a critical yet overlooked joint whose defects affect a large population, especially women 58. Although it is increasingly clear that the TMJ is distinct from other large joints, our understanding on this mysterious joint is primitive. In this study, we investigated the features of cell morphologies, ECMs, and the cell origin of the TMJ during postnatal growth using multiple image techniques and the ScxLin mice with and without a Dmp1 KO (a hypophosphatemic rickets model) background. Our key findings (Fig.7) are: 1) ScxLin directly contributes to a subset of TMJ chondrocyte population via two steps: ScxLin cells in fibrous layer first form dendritic prechondroblasts (rich of type I collagen in its ECM) and subsequently transdifferentiate into ScxLin chondrocytes; 2) ScxLin chondrocytes do not transdifferentiate into bone cells as the non-ScxLin chondrocytes do 14,59; and 3) the ScxLin derived chondrogenesis, similar to the non-ScxLin derived chondrocyte 36, is highly sensitive to a change of phosphorus level as demonstrated in the Dmp1 KO mice.

Fig. 7. Working Hypothesis: Direct contribution of ScxLin cells to the development of TMJ.

Fig. 7

There are two sets of progenitors in the fibrous layer (F) on the top of the condyle. One is Scx, the commonly studied chondrocytes, which form prechondroblasts (P) followed by chondrocytes (C). Subsequently, these Scx chondrocytes transdifferentiate into endochondral bone for TMJ condyle growth. The other set is ScxLin cells that are responsible for a small portion of the progenitors in the fibrous layer. This type of progenitor cells also sequentially differentiates into prechondroblasts and chondrocytes for joint expansion, although they do not further transdifferentiate into bone cells. We name this process as tendon-derived chondrogenesis. Both types of chondrogenesis are highly sensitive to the change of phosphorus level and responsible for TMJ defects caused by hypophosphatemia. In addition, ScxLin cells are solely responsible for TMJ disc formation.

The cell origin of the prechondroblastic layer which is a unique feature of the TMJ condyle is largely unclear, although it is considered to be derived from the perichondrium based on early histological studies 4,60,61. Apparently, our cell lineage study supports a different cell source: the ScxLin origin (Figs.24). In contrast to a one-step transition from chondrocytes to subchondral bone cells 14,59, it takes multiple steps for cell transdifferentiation from a flat fibrous cell to a round or oval chondrocyte via the irregular and dendritic prechondroblasts in addition to complex remodeling in ECM fibers (Fig.1). The co-immunostaining with different cell markers (Fig.4) further showed a dual transition of ScxLin cells from flat fibrous cell to dendritic prechondroblasts (with Col 1 but no Sox9 expressions) and then round chondrocytes (with Sox9 and aggrecan but no Col 1).

The epithelial-mesenchymal cell transdifferentiation (EMT) or vice-versa occurs in gastrulation, neural crest and somite dissociation, craniofacial development, wound healing, organ fibrosis, and tumor metastasis 62. Similarly, our recent publication 14,59,63 using multiple approaches (including cell lineage tracing), in agreement with studies in limb development 13,1719, demonstrated that the vast majority of endochondral bone cells are directly originated from mature chondrocytes via a one-step cell transdifferentiation. Interestingly, in this study we found the ScxLin derived chondrocytes do not undergo osteogenesis as the AcanLin derived chondrocytes do 14,59 (Figs.56). Although we do not know exactly the impact of the ScxLin chondrocyte in TMJ condyle growth, the ScxLin derived chondrocytes may help to maintain a life-span cartilage mass in TMJ condyles in both mice (Fig. S2) and human (Fig. S3B).

Recently, we reported a disproportional increase in the condyle cartilage mass (a sharp increase) and the subchondral bone (a moderate increase) in the Dmp1 KO mice in response to hypophosphatemia 36 (also see Fig.S4). This study suggests two separate chondrocyte pools: one, as a bone precursor, transdifferentiates into an endochondral bone cell; and the other remains as a “permanent chondrocyte” to maintain a stable cartilage mass in the TMJ condyle. The ScxLin chondrocytes appear to belong to the latter group with the following feature: 1) they do not undergo further transdifferentiation into bone cells during normal growth (Figs.25); and 2) they are highly sensitive to hypophosphatemia, which is responsible for the disproportional expansion between the condyle cartilage and bone (Fig.6; Figs.S45). To further enforce the contribution of ScxLin to the formation of a subset of TMJ chondrocytes that does not transdifferentiate to bone cells as the AcanLin derived chondrocytes do, we plan to use a powerful multicolor labeling mouse line 64 in our future studies so that the tracking of differential fate of cells, including neighboring cells, can be assessed effectively.

The TMJ disc is a fibrous extension of the capsule in between the temporal bone and mandible. The anterior portion of the disc is coincident with the insertion of the superior head of the lateral pterygoid, and the posterior portion is continuous with the joint capsule. The origin of the TMJ disc is largely unclear. Here, our lineage tracing results demonstrate a key contribution of ScxLin to the formation of the TMJ disc.

The Scx lineage line is widely used in studies for the fate of tendon/ligament cells 24,65. There were no reports about a direct contribution from Scx+ cells in tendon/ligament to the joint chondrogenesis during normal limb development, although it has been reported that ScxLin participated in ectopic endochondral bone formation in tendon trauma 26,41. Scx+ cells were also found in other tissues, such as periodontal ligament (PDL) 66 and heart valves 67, with no evidence of transdifferentiation into other cell types. Similarly, in this study we observed sparse ScxLin-derived bone marrow fibroblasts in several developmental stages, but they appear not to transdifferentiate into bone cells (Figs.56). Currently, we do not know the impact of those sparse ScxLin-derived bone marrow fibroblasts in the skeletal development, and more studies are needed to uncover the mechanism for the unique roles of ScxLin cells in the chondrogenesis of TMJ condyle.

Taken together, the above comprehensive studies demonstrate the novel roles of ScxLin in TMJ chondrogenesis via the prechondroblastic layer (Fig.7). This new information provides an innovative idea that tendon cells may have a more extensive function beyond a simple mechanical support in body movement, and it will likely revise the current dogma and provide awareness in this understudied area. However, there are more challenging questions to be addressed in the future. First, there is an urgent need to identify more tendon specific tracing mouse lines, as a few ScxLin cells are observed in the bone marrow. Second, both ScxLin and Scx chondrocytes are observed in fibrous and prechondroblastic layers, which raises a question on how to distinguish their features from early progenitors to late daughter cell stages at the gene and protein levels. Particularly, it is unclear if there are even more specific transcriptional factors beyond the known ones for chondrogenesis or osteogenesis, which define the cell fate of these progenitors to transdifferentiate into an osteocyte or to remain as a “permanent chondrocyte”. Lastly, more studies are required to demonstrate the implication of tendon-derived chondrocytes in future diagnosis or treatment of TMJ disorders, which affect a large TMD population 68.

Supplementary Material

1

Fig. S1 There is no tamoxifen-independent recombination in Scx-CreERT2 line. A) No tomato signaling were found in the Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato mice in different ages that did not receive the tamoxifen injection. B) There was no tomato signaling of P70 Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato; Dmp1 KO mice and the controls that did not receive the tamoxifen injection.

2

Fig. S2 The prechondroblastic layer continuously exists in mice TMJ condyle from young to adult age. A) An illustration showed disc (D), fibroblast layer (F); prechondroblasts (P) and chondrocytes (C) in TMJ. B) a non-decalcified Safranin O stain for 2-week mouse condyle showed the histology of the three layers. C) H&E staining for 7-week TMJ condyle showed a substantial portion of the prechondroblast layer (upper panel), and a sharp reduction in all three layers at the age of 8 months (lower panel, red arrows indicating the remained cell clusters in fibrous and prechondroblastic layers). F: fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white solid lines: boundaries between each layer.

3

Fig. S3 The prechondroblastic layer is identified in both rabbit and human TMJ condyle samples. A) An identical 3-layer structure was documented in a 3-week-old rabbit condyle by Safranin O stain. B) A very similar F-P-C layer structure was also observed in newborn (left) and 40-year old (right) TMJ condyle from human cadaver. F: Fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white dotted lines: the boundaries between each layer.

4

Fig. S4 Accelerated chondrogenesis does not results in proportional increase in chondrocyte-derived osteogenesis in the Dmp1 KO condyle. A) Toluidine blue stain displayed an expanded hypertrophic chondrocyte area and disorganized subchondral bone in different age groups of Dmp1 KO condyle (right) compared to the WT (left). B) Safranin O stain further confirmed the increased chondrogenesis and malformed subchondral bone in 2-month Dmp1 KO condyle. C) TEM showed a great expansion in the fibrous layer but dramatic decreases in prechondroblastic and chondrocyte layers, and an accumulation of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the 3-week DMP1 KO condyle. D) The cell lineage tracing from Col10a1-Cre; R26RtdTomato mice revealed more red chondrocytes and bone cells in the 3-week Dmp1 KO condyle, with dramatic increase of Aggrecan expression.

5
6

Fig. S5 ScxLin cells actively transdifferentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes in low phosphorus environment. There were many more ScxLin cells expressing type X collagen (Col10) in the Dmp1 KO condyle cartilage (arrows) compared to the control mice.

Highlights.

  • ScxLin cells are responsible for formation of TMJ disc postnatally;

  • ScxLin cells contribute to formation of a subset of TMJ chondrocytes;

  • ScxLin chondrocytes do not undergo osteogenesis as the Scx chondrocytes do;

  • ScxLin-derived chondrocytes are sensitive to hypophosphatemia

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Douglas Keene and Tufa Sara for their delicate work on TEM. This study is partially supported by NIH R03 DE029541 to YJ and NIH R01 DE025659 to JF.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

The authors have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Purcell P et al. Temporomandibular joint formation requires two distinct hedgehog-dependent steps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 18297–18302, 10.1073/pnas.0908836106 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Owtad P, Park JH, Shen G, Potres Z & Darendeliler MA The biology of TMJ growth modification: a review. J Dent Res 92, 315–321, 10.1177/0022034513476302 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanaka E, Detamore MS & Mercuri LG Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res 87, 296–307, 10.1177/154405910808700406 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stocum DL & Roberts WE Part I: Development and Physiology of the Temporomandibular Joint. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16, 360–368, 10.1007/s11914-018-0447-7 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guo C, Shi Z & Revington P Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004973, 10.1002/14651858.CD004973.pub2 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Lipton JA, Ship JA & Larach-Robinson D Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 124, 115–121, 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0200 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okeson JP Nonsurgical management of disc-interference disorders. Dent Clin North Am 35, 29–51 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shibata S, Suzuki S, Tengan T, Ishii M & Kuroda T A histological study of the developing condylar cartilage of the fetal mouse mandible using coronal sections. Arch Oral Biol 41, 47–54, 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00105-0 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shibukawa Y et al. Temporomandibular joint formation and condyle growth require Indian hedgehog signaling. Dev Dyn 236, 426–434, 10.1002/dvdy.21036 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Embree MC et al. Exploiting endogenous fibrocartilage stem cells to regenerate cartilage and repair joint injury. Nat Commun 7, 13073, 10.1038/ncomms13073 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kalajzic I et al. Use of type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res 17, 15–25, 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.15 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalajzic Z et al. Directing the expression of a green fluorescent protein transgene in differentiated osteoblasts: comparison between rat type I collagen and rat osteocalcin promoters. Bone 31, 654–660 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang L, Tsang KY, Tang HC, Chan D & Cheah KS Hypertrophic chondrocytes can become osteoblasts and osteocytes in endochondral bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 12097–12102, 10.1073/pnas.1302703111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jing Y et al. Chondrocytes Directly Transform into Bone Cells in Mandibular Condyle Growth. Journal of dental research 94, 1668–1675, 10.1177/0022034515598135 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jing Y et al. Vital Roles of beta-catenin in Trans-differentiation of Chondrocytes to Bone Cells. Int J Biol Sci 14, 1–9, 10.7150/ijbs.23165 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hinton RJ, Jing Y, Jing J & Feng JQ Roles of Chondrocytes in Endochondral Bone Formation and Fracture Repair. J Dent Res 96, 23–30, 10.1177/0022034516668321 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang G et al. Osteogenic fate of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell research 24, 1266–1269, 10.1038/cr.2014.111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou X et al. Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet 10, e1004820, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004820 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ono N, Ono W, Nagasawa T & Kronenberg HM A subset of chondrogenic cells provides early mesenchymal progenitors in growing bones. Nat Cell Biol 16, 1157–1167, 10.1038/ncb3067 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Summers AP & Koob TJ The evolution of tendon--morphology and material properties. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology 133, 1159–1170 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vogel KG & Koob TJ Structural specialization in tendons under compression. International review of cytology 115, 267–293 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sarin VK, Erickson GM, Giori NJ, Bergman AG & Carter DR Coincident development of sesamoid bones and clues to their evolution. The Anatomical record 257, 174–180 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oliva F, Via AG & Maffulli N Physiopathology of intratendinous calcific deposition. BMC medicine 10, 95, 10.1186/1741-7015-10-95 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang AH, Lu HH & Schweitzer R Molecular regulation of tendon cell fate during development. J Orthop Res 33, 800–812, 10.1002/jor.22834 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nourissat G, Berenbaum F & Duprez D Tendon injury: from biology to tendon repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 223–233, 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.26 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Howell K et al. Novel Model of Tendon Regeneration Reveals Distinct Cell Mechanisms Underlying Regenerative and Fibrotic Tendon Healing. Sci Rep 7, 45238, 10.1038/srep45238 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.George A, Sabsay B, Simonian PA & Veis A Characterization of a novel dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein. Implications for induction of biomineralization. The Journal of biological chemistry 268, 12624–12630 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Feng JQ et al. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet 38, 1310–1315, 10.1038/ng1905 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Feng JQ et al. The Dentin matrix protein 1 (Dmp1) is specifically expressed in mineralized, but not soft, tissues during development. Journal of dental research 82, 776–780, 10.1177/154405910308201003 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lorenz-Depiereux B et al. DMP1 mutations in autosomal recessive hypophosphatemia implicate a bone matrix protein in the regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Nat Genet 38, 1248–1250, 10.1038/ng1868 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ye L et al. Dmp1-deficient mice display severe defects in cartilage formation responsible for a chondrodysplasia-like phenotype. J Biol Chem 280, 6197–6203, 10.1074/jbc.M412911200 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu T et al. DMP1 Ablation in the Rabbit Results in Mineralization Defects and Abnormalities in Haversian Canal/Osteon Microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 34, 1115–1128, 10.1002/jbmr.3683 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu Y & Feng JQ FGF23 in skeletal modeling and remodeling. Curr Osteoporos Rep 9, 103–108, 10.1007/s11914-011-0053-4 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carpenter TO et al. Rickets. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3, 17101, 10.1038/nrdp.2017.101 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Feng JQ, Clinkenbeard EL, Yuan B, White KE & Drezner MK Osteocyte regulation of phosphate homeostasis and bone mineralization underlies the pathophysiology of the heritable disorders of rickets and osteomalacia. Bone 54, 213–221, 10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.046 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li H et al. Hypophosphatemic rickets accelerate chondrogenesis and cell trans-differentiation from TMJ chondrocytes into bone cells via a sharp increase in beta-catenin. Bone 131, 115151, 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115151 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pryce BA, Brent AE, Murchison ND, Tabin CJ & Schweitzer R Generation of transgenic tendon reporters, ScxGFP and ScxAP, using regulatory elements of the scleraxis gene. Dev Dyn 236, 1677–1682, 10.1002/dvdy.21179 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brent AE, Schweitzer R & Tabin CJ A somitic compartment of tendon progenitors. Cell 113, 235–248 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Eyal S et al. On the development of the patella. Development 142, 1831–1839, 10.1242/dev.121970 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sugimoto Y, Takimoto A, Hiraki Y & Shukunami C Generation and characterization of ScxCre transgenic mice. Genesis 51, 275–283, 10.1002/dvg.22372 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Agarwal S et al. Scleraxis-Lineage Cells Contribute to Ectopic Bone Formation in Muscle and Tendon. Stem Cells 35, 705–710, 10.1002/stem.2515 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Henry SP et al. Generation of aggrecan-CreERT2 knockin mice for inducible Cre activity in adult cartilage. Genesis 47, 805–814, 10.1002/dvg.20564 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gebhard S et al. Specific expression of Cre recombinase in hypertrophic cartilage under the control of a BAC-Col10a1 promoter. Matrix Biol 27, 693–699, 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.07.001 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jahn HM et al. Refined protocols of tamoxifen injection for inducible DNA recombination in mouse astroglia. Sci Rep 8, 5913, 10.1038/s41598-018-24085-9 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang X et al. Histological analysis of GFP expression in murine bone. J Histochem Cytochem 53, 593–602, doi:53/5/593 [pii] 10.1369/jhc.4A6401.2005 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang R et al. Unique roles of phosphorus in endochondral bone formation and osteocyte maturation. J Bone Miner Res 26, 1047–1056, 10.1002/jbmr.294 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jing Y, Hinton RJ, Chan KS & Feng JQ Co-localization of Cell Lineage Markers and the Tomato Signal. J Vis Exp, 10.3791/54982 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Jing J et al. Critical role of Bmpr1a in mandibular condyle growth. Connect Tissue Res 55 Suppl 1, 73–78, 10.3109/03008207.2014.923858 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Keene DR & Tufa SF Ultrastructural analysis of the extracellular matrix. Methods Cell Biol 143, 1–39, 10.1016/bs.mcb.2017.08.002 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Preibisch S, Saalfeld S & Tomancak P Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics 25, 1463–1465, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jing D et al. Tissue clearing of both hard and soft tissue organs with the PEGASOS method. Cell Res 28, 803–818, 10.1038/s41422-018-0049-z (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ren Y, Lin S, Jing Y, Dechow PC & Feng JQ A novel way to statistically analyze morphologic changes in Dmp1-null osteocytes. Connect Tissue Res 55 Suppl 1, 129–133, 10.3109/03008207.2014.923879 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mizoguchi I, Nakamura M, Takahashi I, Kagayama M & Mitani H An immunohistochemical study of localization of type I and type II collagens in mandibular condylar cartilage compared with tibial growth plate. Histochemistry 93, 593–599, 10.1007/bf00272201 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hinton RJ, Jing J & Feng JQ Genetic Influences on Temporomandibular Joint Development and Growth. Curr Top Dev Biol 115, 85–109, 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.07.008 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hinton RJ Response of the intermaxillary suture cartilage to alterations in masticatory function. Anat Rec 220, 376–387, 10.1002/ar.1092200406 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Petrovic AG Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular condylar growth. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 10, 25–34 (1972). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Moffett BC Jr., Johnson LC, McCabe JB & Askew HC Articular Remodeling in the Adult Human Temporomandibular Joint. Am J Anat 115, 119–141, 10.1002/aja.1001150108 (1964). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Warren MP & Fried JL Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs 169, 187–192, 10.1159/000047881 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jing Y et al. Chondrogenesis and osteogenesis are one continuous developmental and lineage defined biological process. Sci Rep 7, 10020, 10.1038/s41598-017-10048-z (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hinton RJ Genes that regulate morphogenesis and growth of the temporomandibular joint: a review. Dev Dyn 243, 864–874, 10.1002/dvdy.24130 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liang W et al. Observing the development of the temporomandibular joint in embryonic and post-natal mice using various staining methods. Exp Ther Med 11, 481–489, 10.3892/etm.2015.2937 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY & Nieto MA Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139, 871–890, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jing Y, Wang Z, Li H, Ma C & Feng J Chondrogenesis Defines Future Skeletal Patterns Via Cell Transdifferentiation from Chondrocytes to Bone Cells. Curr Osteoporos Rep 18, 199–209, 10.1007/s11914-020-00586-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Livet J et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450, 56–62, 10.1038/nature06293 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kaji DA, Howell KL, Balic Z, Hubmacher D & Huang AH Tgfbeta signaling is required for tenocyte recruitment and functional neonatal tendon regeneration. Elife 9, 10.7554/eLife.51779 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Takimoto A et al. Scleraxis and osterix antagonistically regulate tensile force-responsive remodeling of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Development 142, 787–796, 10.1242/dev.116228 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Levay AK et al. Scleraxis is required for cell lineage differentiation and extracellular matrix remodeling during murine heart valve formation in vivo. Circ Res 103, 948–956, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177238 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Karsenty G, Kronenberg HM & Settembre C Genetic control of bone formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 25, 629–648, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113308 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Fig. S1 There is no tamoxifen-independent recombination in Scx-CreERT2 line. A) No tomato signaling were found in the Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato mice in different ages that did not receive the tamoxifen injection. B) There was no tomato signaling of P70 Scx-CreERT2; R26RtdTomato; Dmp1 KO mice and the controls that did not receive the tamoxifen injection.

2

Fig. S2 The prechondroblastic layer continuously exists in mice TMJ condyle from young to adult age. A) An illustration showed disc (D), fibroblast layer (F); prechondroblasts (P) and chondrocytes (C) in TMJ. B) a non-decalcified Safranin O stain for 2-week mouse condyle showed the histology of the three layers. C) H&E staining for 7-week TMJ condyle showed a substantial portion of the prechondroblast layer (upper panel), and a sharp reduction in all three layers at the age of 8 months (lower panel, red arrows indicating the remained cell clusters in fibrous and prechondroblastic layers). F: fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white solid lines: boundaries between each layer.

3

Fig. S3 The prechondroblastic layer is identified in both rabbit and human TMJ condyle samples. A) An identical 3-layer structure was documented in a 3-week-old rabbit condyle by Safranin O stain. B) A very similar F-P-C layer structure was also observed in newborn (left) and 40-year old (right) TMJ condyle from human cadaver. F: Fibrous layer; P: prechondroblastic layer; C: chondrocytic layer; white dotted lines: the boundaries between each layer.

4

Fig. S4 Accelerated chondrogenesis does not results in proportional increase in chondrocyte-derived osteogenesis in the Dmp1 KO condyle. A) Toluidine blue stain displayed an expanded hypertrophic chondrocyte area and disorganized subchondral bone in different age groups of Dmp1 KO condyle (right) compared to the WT (left). B) Safranin O stain further confirmed the increased chondrogenesis and malformed subchondral bone in 2-month Dmp1 KO condyle. C) TEM showed a great expansion in the fibrous layer but dramatic decreases in prechondroblastic and chondrocyte layers, and an accumulation of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the 3-week DMP1 KO condyle. D) The cell lineage tracing from Col10a1-Cre; R26RtdTomato mice revealed more red chondrocytes and bone cells in the 3-week Dmp1 KO condyle, with dramatic increase of Aggrecan expression.

5
6

Fig. S5 ScxLin cells actively transdifferentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes in low phosphorus environment. There were many more ScxLin cells expressing type X collagen (Col10) in the Dmp1 KO condyle cartilage (arrows) compared to the control mice.

RESOURCES