Skip to main content
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle logoLink to Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
letter
. 2020 Dec 19;11(6):1863–1864. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12637

Comment on: “Handgrip weakness, low fat‐free mass, and overall survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with curative‐intent radiotherapy" by Burtin et al.

Azadeh Shafieesabet 1,, Wolfram Doehner 1,2
PMCID: PMC7749568  PMID: 33340290

We read with great interest the article by Burtin et al. 1 This study has shown that handgrip weakness and low fat‐free mass index (FFMI) are independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with early and locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative‐intent (chemo) radiation.

In the current study, handgrip weakness is defined as maximal handgrip strength below the 10th percentile of the UK Biobank reference values, taking gender, age, and height into account in at least one side, while in this reference percentile 5 was calculated as a point of reference for abnormally low handgrip strength. 2

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by a progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, along with adipose tissue wasting, systemic inflammation, and other metabolic abnormalities leading to functional impairment. 3 , 4 , 5 Cancer cachexia has long been recognized as a direct cause of complications in cancer patients, reducing quality of life and worsening disease outcomes. 6 Although cancer cachexia is characterized by other factors like anorexia, fatigue, and loss of muscle strength, 7 body weight (BW) loss is one of the core factors of cancer cachexia, which is consistent with the criteria proposed by Fearon or Evans that implicate BW loss as a key factor in cancer cachexia. 8 , 9

Mytelka et al. reported that increasing weight loss led to substantially worse outcomes for NSCLC patients independent of other variables. 10 Similarly, Takayama et al. demonstrated that BW loss most likely shortened survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and should be closely monitored. 7 These results suggest the important role of cachexia in prognosing the survival in advanced NSCLC patients.

Burtin et al. demonstrated that handgrip weakness (hazard ratio = 1.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.59, P = 0.008) and low FFMI (hazard ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.51, P = 0.024) were associated with OS. 1 Thus, because the model is adjusted only for age, gender, disease stage, and Charlson comorbidity index, it is unable to show any impact of weight loss, body mass index, or cachexia on survival. Furthermore, low FFM was defined as an FFMI below 17 kg/m2 in male patients and below 15 kg/m2 in female patients, in line with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition. However, it is recommended to use the GLIM consensus criteria for malnutrition in parallel with established concepts, including cachexia or sarcopenia. 11 We suggest that baseline body mass index and weight loss should be included in the model to provide a precise approach for identifying poor prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests and certify that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 12

Shafieesabet A., and Doehner W. (2020) Letter to the editor regarding ‘handgrip weakness, low fat‐free mass, and overall survival in non‐small cell lung cancer treated with curative‐intent radiotherapy’, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 11, 1863–1864, 10.1002/jcsm.12637

References

  • 1. Burtin C, Bezuidenhout J, Sanders KJC, Dingemans AC, Schols A, Peeters STH, et al. Handgrip weakness, low fat‐free mass, and overall survival in non‐small cell lung cancer treated with curative‐intent radiotherapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11:424–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Spruit MA, Sillen MJ, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Franssen FM. New normative values for handgrip strength: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:775 e5–775 e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Neto NIP, Murari ASP, Oyama LM, Otoch JP, Alcântara PSM, Tokeshi F, et al. Peritumoural adipose tissue pro‐inflammatory cytokines are associated with tumoural growth factors in cancer cachexia patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9:1101–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pin F, Barreto R, Couch ME, Bonetto A, O'Connell TM. Cachexia induced by cancer and chemotherapy yield distinct perturbations to energy metabolism. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:140–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Scherbakov N, Doehner W. Cachexia as a common characteristic in multiple chronic disease. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9:1189–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Peixoto da Silva S, Santos JMO, Costa ESMP, Gil da Costa RM, Medeiros R. Cancer cachexia and its pathophysiology: links with sarcopenia, anorexia and asthenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11:619–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Takayama K, Atagi S, Imamura F, Tanaka H, Minato K, Harada T, et al. Quality of life and survival survey of cancer cachexia in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients—Japan nutrition and QOL survey in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer study. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:3473–3480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr 2008;27:793–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:489–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mytelka DS, Li L, Benoit K. Post‐diagnosis weight loss as a prognostic factor in non‐small cell lung cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9:86–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:207–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2019. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10:1143–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES