Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2020 Dec;24(71):1–162. doi: 10.3310/hta24710

Surgical treatments compared with early structured physiotherapy in secondary care for adults with primary frozen shoulder: the UK FROST three-arm RCT.

Stephen Brealey, Matthew Northgraves, Lucksy Kottam, Ada Keding, Belen Corbacho, Lorna Goodchild, Cynthia Srikesavan, Saleema Rex, Charalambos P Charalambous, Nigel Hanchard, Alison Armstrong, Andrew Brooksbank, Andrew Carr, Cushla Cooper, Joseph Dias, Iona Donnelly, Catherine Hewitt, Sarah E Lamb, Catriona McDaid, Gerry Richardson, Sara Rodgers, Emma Sharp, Sally Spencer, David Torgerson, Francine Toye, Amar Rangan
PMCID: PMC7750869  PMID: 33292924

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frozen shoulder causes pain and stiffness. It affects around 10% of people in their fifties and is slightly more common in women. Costly and invasive surgical interventions are used, without high-quality evidence that these are effective.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three treatments in secondary care for adults with frozen shoulder; to qualitatively explore the acceptability of these treatments to patients and health-care professionals; and to update a systematic review to explore the trial findings in the context of existing evidence for the three treatments.

DESIGN

This was a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, randomised superiority trial with unequal allocation (2 : 2 : 1). An economic evaluation and a nested qualitative study were also carried out.

SETTING

The orthopaedic departments of 35 hospitals across the UK were recruited from April 2015, with final follow-up in December 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with unilateral frozen shoulder, characterised by restriction of passive external rotation in the affected shoulder to < 50% of the opposite shoulder, and with plain radiographs excluding other pathology.

INTERVENTIONS

The inventions were early structured physiotherapy with a steroid injection, manipulation under anaesthesia with a steroid injection and arthroscopic capsular release followed by manipulation. Both of the surgical interventions were followed with post-procedural physiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome and end point was the Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months post randomisation. A difference of 5 points between early structured physiotherapy and manipulation under anaesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release or of 4 points between manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release was judged clinically important.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 503 participants was 54 years; 319 were female (63%) and 150 had diabetes (30%). The primary analyses comprised 473 participants (94%). At the primary end point of 12 months, participants randomised to arthroscopic capsular release had, on average, a statistically significantly higher (better) Oxford Shoulder Score than those randomised to manipulation under anaesthesia (2.01 points, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 3.91 points; p = 0.04) or early structured physiotherapy (3.06 points, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 5.41 points; p = 0.01). Manipulation under anaesthesia did not result in statistically significantly better Oxford Shoulder Score than early structured physiotherapy (1.05 points, 95% confidence interval -1.28 to 3.39 points; p = 0.38). No differences were deemed of clinical importance. Serious adverse events were rare but occurred in participants randomised to surgery (arthroscopic capsular release,n = 8; manipulation under anaesthesia,n = 2). There was, however, one serious adverse event in a participant who received non-trial physiotherapy. The base-case economic analysis showed that manipulation under anaesthesia was more expensive than early structured physiotherapy, with slightly better utilities. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for manipulation under anaesthesia was £6984 per additional quality-adjusted life-year, and this intervention was probably 86% cost-effective at the threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Arthroscopic capsular release was more costly than early structured physiotherapy and manipulation under anaesthesia, with no statistically significant benefit in utilities. Participants in the qualitative study wanted early medical help and a quicker pathway to resolve their shoulder problem. Nine studies were identified from the updated systematic review, including UK FROST, of which only two could be pooled, and found that arthroscopic capsular release was more effective than physiotherapy in the long-term shoulder functioning of patients, but not to the clinically important magnitude used in UK FROST.

LIMITATIONS

Implementing physiotherapy to the trial standard in clinical practice might prove challenging but could avoid theatre use and post-procedural physiotherapy. There are potential confounding effects of waiting times in the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the three interventions was clearly superior. Early structured physiotherapy with a steroid injection is an accessible and low-cost option. Manipulation under anaesthesia is the most cost-effective option. Arthroscopic capsular release carries higher risks and higher costs.

FUTURE WORK

Evaluation in a randomised controlled trial is recommended to address the increasing popularity of hydrodilatation despite the paucity of high-quality evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN48804508.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 71. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Plain language summary

Frozen shoulder occurs when the soft tissue envelope around the shoulder joint becomes inflamed, scarred and contracted, making movement painful and stiff. It affects around 1 in 10 people and is more common in women. Most patients are treated in the community. Those who do not improve are offered treatments in hospital. This includes costly and invasive surgical options. It is unclear which treatment provides the best patient outcomes and is cost-effective. UK FROST (UK FROzen Shoulder Trial) comprised 503 patients (from 35 UK hospitals) who randomly received one of three commonly offered treatments for frozen shoulder: early physiotherapy to restore movement, including a steroid injection for pain reliefmanipulation under anaesthesia, to stretch and tear the tight capsule to restore movement, and a steroid injection followed by physiotherapyarthroscopic capsular release, which uses keyhole surgery, including manipulation, to restore movement, followed by physiotherapy with pain medication. No important differences were found between the three treatments in shoulder function or pain at 12 months. Fewer patients who received arthroscopic capsular release required further treatment, and patients who received arthroscopic capsular release had slightly better shoulder function and pain outcomes than those who received the manipulation procedure or early physiotherapy. This improvement, however, was unlikely to be of clinical benefit to patients. Arthroscopic capsular release had slightly higher risks and substantially higher costs. Six serious complications were reported in patients who received arthroscopic capsular release (mostly owing to co-existing health problems) and two were reported in patients who received manipulation under anaesthesia. Physiotherapy was the least expensive treatment, but patients who received manipulation under anaesthesia had slightly better general health than those who received physiotherapy. Early physiotherapy with steroid injection could be accessed quicker than the surgical alternatives. Manipulation under anaesthesia cost more than physiotherapy but provided the best value for money. Patients in the study wanted early access to medical help to improve their shoulder problems.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. Boyle-Walker KL, Gabard DL, Bietsch E, Masek-VanArsdale DM, Robinson BL. A profile of patients with adhesive capsulitis. J Hand Ther 1997;10:222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(97)80025-7 doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(97)80025-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Hand GC, Athanasou NA, Matthews T, Carr AJ. The pathology of frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:928–32. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19097 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19097. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Bunker TD, Anthony PP. The pathology of frozen shoulder. A Dupuytren-like disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:677–83. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559688 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559688. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:231–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Buchbinder R, Green S. Effect of arthrographic shoulder joint distension with saline and corticosteroid for adhesive capsulitis. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:384–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.013532 doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Hanchard NC, Goodchild L, Thompson J, O’Brien T, Davison D, Richardson C. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment and physiotherapy management of contracted (frozen) shoulder: quick reference summary. Physiotherapy 2012;98:117–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.54.12.959 doi: 10.1136/ard.54.12.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:642–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20535 doi: 10.1002/art.20535. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Bunker TD. Time for a new name for ‘frozen shoulder’. Br Med J 1985;290:1233–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.290.6477.1233 doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6477.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Park SW, Lee HS, Kim JH. The effectiveness of intensive mobilization techniques combined with capsular distension for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:1767–70. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1767 doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Rundquist PJ, Ludewig PM. Patterns of motion loss in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder range of motion. Clin Biomech 2004;19:810–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Codman E. Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa. Boston, MA: Privately published; 1934.
  13. Maund E, Craig D, Suekarran S, Neilson A, Wright K, Brealey S, et al. Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2012;16(11). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16110 doi: 10.3310/hta16110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Walmsley S, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA. Movement and pain patterns in early stage primary/idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: a factor analysis. Physiotherapy 2014;100:336–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Rundquist PJ, Anderson DD, Guanche CA, Ludewig PM. Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1473–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00359-9 doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00359-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Wolf EM, Cox WK. The external rotation test in the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Orthopedics 2010;33:303. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100329-11 doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100329-11. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Noboa E, López-Graña G, Barco R, Antuña S. Distension test in passive external rotation: validation of a new clinical test for the early diagnosis of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2015;59:354–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2014.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2014.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Jones S, Hanchard N, Hamilton S, Rangan A. A qualitative study of patients’ perceptions and priorities when living with primary frozen shoulder. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003452 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology 2006;45:215–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei139 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei139. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Wofford JL, Mansfield RJ, Watkins RS. Patient characteristics and clinical management of patients with shoulder pain in U.S. primary care settings: secondary data analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005;6:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-4 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Rangan A, Hanchard N, McDaid C. What is the most effective treatment for frozen shoulder? BMJ 2016;354:i4162. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4162 doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4162. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Dennis L, Brealey S, Rangan A, Rookmoneea M, Watson J. Managing idiopathic frozen shoulder: a survey of health professionals’ current practice and research priorities. Shoulder Elbow 2010;2:294–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x. [DOI]
  23. Quraishi NA, Johnston P, Bayer J, Crowe M, Chakrabarti AJ. Thawing the frozen shoulder. A randomised trial comparing manipulation under anaesthesia with hydrodilatation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1197–200. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18863 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18863. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Kivimäki J, Pohjolainen T, Malmivaara A, Kannisto M, Guillaume J, Seitsalo S, Nissinen M. Manipulation under anesthesia with home exercises versus home exercises alone in the treatment of frozen shoulder: a randomized, controlled trial with 125 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:722–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.125 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.125. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Gallacher S, Beazley JC, Evans J, Anaspure R, Silver D, Redfern A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic capsular release versus hydrodilatation in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:1401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Grant JA, Schroeder N, Miller BS, Carpenter JE. Comparison of manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Brealey S, Armstrong AL, Brooksbank A, Carr AJ, Charalambous CP, Cooper C, et al. United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), multi-centre, randomised, 12 month, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Early Structured Physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a primary frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:614. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2352-2 doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2352-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  28. Rangan A, Goodchild L, Gibson J, Brownson P, Thomas M, Rees J, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways – frozen shoulder. Shoulder Elbow 2015;7:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573215601779 doi: 10.1177/1758573215601779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. New Zealand Guidelines Group. The Diagnosis and Management of Soft Tissue Shoulder Injuries and Related Disorders. Wellington: New Zealand Guidelines Group; 2004.
  30. Hanchard NC, Howe TE, Gilbert MM. Diagnosis of shoulder pain by history and selective tissue tension: agreement between assessors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:147–53. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.3.147 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.3.147. [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, Rees JL, Moser J, Beard DJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial.] Health Technol Assess 2015;19(80). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19800 doi: 10.3310/hta19800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Corbacho Martin B, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomised clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313:1037–47. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.1629 doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1629. [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Hanchard N, Goodchild L, Thompson J, O’Brien T, Watson H. Evaluation of clinical guidelines for contracted (frozen) shoulder 12–18 months after publication. Int J Ther Rehabil 2013;20:543–9. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.11.543 doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.11.543. [DOI]
  34. Hanchard NC, Goodchild L, Thompson J, O’Brien T, Davison D, Richardson C. A questionnaire survey of UK physiotherapists on the diagnosis and management of contracted (frozen) shoulder. Physiotherapy 2011;97:115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Hanchard NCA, Goodchild L, Brealey SD, Lamb SE, Rangan A. Physiotherapy for primary frozen shoulder in secondary care: developing and implementing stand-alone and post operative protocols for UK FROST and inferences for wider practice. Physiotherapy 2020;107:150–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Babcock HM, Matava MJ, Fraser V. Postarthroscopy surgical site infections: review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/324627 doi: 10.1086/324627. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Dakin SG, Rangan A, Martinez F, Brealey S, Northgraves M, Kottam L, et al. Tissue inflammation signatures point towards resolution in adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatology 2019;58:1109–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez007 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Carette S, Moffet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Frémont P, et al. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or a combination of the two in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:829–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10954 doi: 10.1002/art.10954. [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Ryans I, Montgomery A, Galway R, Kernohan WG, McKane R. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular triamcinolone and/or physiotherapy in shoulder capsulitis. Rheumatology 2005;44:529–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh535 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh535. [DOI] [PubMed]
  40. Bloom JE, Rischin A, Johnston RV, Buchbinder R. Image-guided versus blind glucocorticoid injection for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;8:CD009147. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009147.pub2 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009147.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  41. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:593–600. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.78B4.0780593 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B4.0780593. [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr AJ. The Oxford Shoulder Score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:119–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7 doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  43. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:160–4. [PubMed]
  44. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993;2:217–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730020305 doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020305. [DOI] [PubMed]
  45. Dawson J, Hill G, Fitzpatrick R, Carr AJ. The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment. J Bone Joint Surg 2001;83:877–82. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.0830877 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.0830877. [DOI] [PubMed]
  46. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual. Toronto, ON: Institute for Work and Health; 2011.
  47. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1038–46. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02060 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060. [DOI] [PubMed]
  48. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1008–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  49. Staples MP, Forbes A, Green S, Buchbinder R. Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.023 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  50. Brooks R. EuroQol: the currrent state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  51. Group EQ. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:119–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  52. Bharmal M, Thomas J. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health 2006;9:262–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00108.x doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00108.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  53. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  54. Angst F, Schwyzer H-K, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S174–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630 doi: 10.1002/acr.20630. [DOI] [PubMed]
  55. Holmgren T, Björnsson Hallgren H, Öberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ 2012;344:e787. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e787 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  56. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  57. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S240–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543 doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. [DOI] [PubMed]
  58. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Surgical Site Infection: Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection. Clinical guideline 74. London: NICE; 2008.
  59. Baker P, Nanda R, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A. A comparison of the Constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed]
  60. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. Lancet 2005;365:1591–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  61. Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ, Miles JN. Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some circumstances. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1004–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  62. Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1398–407. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200010000-00005 doi: 10.2106/00004623-200010000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  63. Dawson J, Harris KK, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. A comparison of the Oxford shoulder score and shoulder pain and disability index: factor structure in the context of a large randomized controlled trial. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2016;7:195–203. https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S115488 doi: 10.2147/PROM.S115488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  64. Ashby R, Turner G, Cross B, Mitchell N, Torgerson D. A randomized trial of electronic reminders showed a reduction in the time to respond to postal questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:208–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  65. Mitchell N, Hewitt CE, Lenaghan E, Platt E, Shepstone L, Torgerson DJ, SCOOP study team. Prior notification of trial participants by newsletter increased response rates: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1348–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  66. van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 2012;15:708–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  67. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2013. [PubMed]
  68. Manca A, Palmer S. Handling missing data in patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomised clinical trials. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2005;4:65–75. https://doi.org/10.2165/00148365-200504020-00001 doi: 10.2165/00148365-200504020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed]
  69. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2018. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2018.
  70. NHS England. NHS Reference Costs 2017 to 2018. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/national-cost-collection/ (accessed 10 September 2020).
  71. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (online) London: BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. URL: www.medicinescomplete.com (accessed 10 September 2020).
  72. Office for National Statistics. EARN01: Average Weekly Earnings. London: Office for National Statistics; 2019.
  73. Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, Van Hout B. An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England. London: Office of Health Economics Research Paper; 2015.
  74. NICE. Position Statement on Use of the EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England (Updated October 2019). URL: www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/NICE-guidance/NICE-technology-appraisal-guidance/eq5d5l_nice_position_statement.pdf (accessed 1 November 2020).
  75. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ 2005;14:487–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.944 doi: 10.1002/hec.944. [DOI] [PubMed]
  76. Billingham LJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Methods for the analysis of quality-of-life and survival data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 1999;3(10). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta3100 doi: 10.3310/hta3100. [DOI] [PubMed]
  77. White IR, Horton NJ, Carpenter J, Pocock SJ. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ 2011;342:d40. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d40 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  78. Faria R, Gomes M, Epstein D, White IR. A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics 2014;32:1157–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0193-3 doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0193-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  79. Leurent B, Gomes M, Faria R, Morris S, Grieve R, Carpenter JR. Sensitivity analysis for not-at-random missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: a tutorial. PharmacoEconomics 2018;36:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0650-5 doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0650-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  80. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067 doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. [DOI] [PubMed]
  81. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004.
  82. Johannesson M, Weinstein MC. On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 1993;12:459–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(93)90005-Y doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90005-Y. [DOI] [PubMed]
  83. Manca A, Lambert PC, Sculpher M, Rice N. Cost-effectiveness analysis using data from multinational trials: the use of bivariate hierarchical modeling. Med Decis Making 2007;27:471–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07302132 doi: 10.1177/0272989X07302132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  84. Gomes M, Grieve R, Nixon R, Ng ES, Carpenter J, Thompson SG. Methods for covariate adjustment in cost-effectiveness analysis that use cluster randomised trials. Health Econ 2012;21:1101–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.2812 doi: 10.1002/hec.2812. [DOI] [PubMed]
  85. Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the Estimation of the NICE Cost Effectiveness Threshold. CHE Research Paper 81. York: University of York; 2013.
  86. Lomas J, Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M. Resolving the ‘cost-effective but unaffordable’ paradox: estimating the health opportunity costs of nonmarginal budget impacts. Value Health 2018;21:266–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed]
  87. Clement C, Edwards SL, Rapport F, Russell IT, Hutchings HA. Exploring qualitative methods reported in registered trials and their yields (EQUITY): systematic review. Trials 2018;19:589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2983-y doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2983-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  88. O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J. What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002889. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  89. Holmberg C, Karner JJ, Rappenecker J, Witt CM. Clinical trial participants’ experiences of completing questionnaires: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004363. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004363 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  90. Minns Lowe CJ, Moser J, Barker KL. Why participants in the United Kingdom Rotator Cuff Tear (UKUFF) trial did not remain in their allocated treatment arm: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy 2018;104:224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2017.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  91. Prothero L, Sturt J, de Souza S, Lempp H, TITRATE Programme Investigators. Intensive management for moderate rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study of patients’ and practitioners’ views. BMC Rheumatol 2019;3:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0057-8 doi: 10.1186/s41927-019-0057-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  92. Carter B. Clients’ experiences of frozen shoulder and its treatment with Bowen technique. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2002;8:204–10. https://doi.org/10.1054/ctnm.2002.0645 doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0645. [DOI] [PubMed]
  93. Baker SE, Edwards R. How Many Qualitative Interviews is Enough? Expert Voices and Early Career Reflections on Sampling and Cases in Qualitative Research. Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods; 2012.
  94. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory – A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006.
  95. Rindflesch AB. A grounded-theory investigation of patient education in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract 2009;25:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980902776613 doi: 10.1080/09593980902776613. [DOI] [PubMed]
  96. World Health Organization (WHO). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
  97. Stucki G. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:733–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000179521.70639.83 doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000179521.70639.83. [DOI] [PubMed]
  98. Roe Y, Bautz-Holter E, Juel NG, Soberg HL. Identification of relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in patients with shoulder pain: a cross-sectional study. J Rehabil Med 2013;45:662–9. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1159 doi: 10.2340/16501977-1159. [DOI] [PubMed]
  99. Bagheri F, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Bidgoli HF. Factors associated with pain, disability and quality of life in patients suffering from frozen shoulder. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2016;4:243–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  100. Toprak M, Erden M. Sleep quality, pain, anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2019;32:287–91. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-171010 doi: 10.3233/BMR-171010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  101. Page MJ, O’Connor DA, Malek M, Haas R, Beaton D, Huang H, et al. Patients’ experience of shoulder disorders: a systematic review of qualitative studies for the OMERACT Shoulder Core Domain Set. Rheumatology 2019;58:1410–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez046 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez046. [DOI] [PubMed]
  102. Rodgers S, Brealey S, Jefferson L, McDaid C, Maund E, Hanchard N, et al. Exploring the outcomes in studies of primary frozen shoulder: is there a need for a core outcome set? Qual Life Res 2014;23:2495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0708-6 doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0708-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  103. Page MJ, Huang H, Verhagen AP, Gagnier JJ, Buchbinder R. Outcome reporting in randomized trials for shoulder disorders: literature review to inform the development of a core outcome set. Arthritis Care Res 2018;70:252–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23254 doi: 10.1002/acr.23254. [DOI] [PubMed]
  104. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Green SE, Beaton DE, Jain NB, Lenza M, et al. Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:1270–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  105. Sun Y, Lu S, Zhang P, Wang Z, Chen J. Steroid injection versus physiotherapy for patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a PRIMSA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine 2016;95:e3469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003469 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  106. Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, Johnston RV, McBain B, Chau M, Buchbinder R. Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;8:CD011275. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011275 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  107. Bailey DL, Holden MA, Foster NE, Quicke JG, Haywood KL, Bishop A. Defining adherence to therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:326–331. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098742 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098742. [DOI] [PubMed]
  108. Chester R, Jerosch-Herold C, Lewis J, Shepstone L. Psychological factors are associated with the outcome of physiotherapy for people with shoulder pain: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2018;52:269–75. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096084 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  109. Picorelli AM, Pereira LS, Pereira DS, Felício D, Sherrington C. Adherence to exercise programs for older people is influenced by program characteristics and personal factors: a systematic review. J Physiother 2014;60:151–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2014.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed]
  110. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  111. Carroll LJ, Lis A, Weiser S, Torti J. How well do you expect to recover, and what does recovery mean, anyway? Qualitative study of expectations after a musculoskeletal injury. Phys Ther 2016;96:797–807. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150229 doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150229. [DOI] [PubMed]
  112. Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1864. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1864 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  113. Walter SD, Turner RM, Macaskill P, McCaffery KJ, Irwig L. Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0304-x doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0304-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  114. Cook C, Sheets C. Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials. J Man Manip Ther 2011;19:55–7. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698111X12899036752014 doi: 10.1179/106698111X12899036752014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  115. Ghogawala Z, Barker F, Carter BS. Clinical equipoise and the surgical randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2008;62:N9–10. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000333288.21621.a9 doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333288.21621.a9. [DOI]
  116. Kwaees TA, Charalambous CP. Surgical and non-surgical treatment of frozen shoulder. Survey on surgeons treatment preferences. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014;4:420–4. https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.04.2014.05 doi: 10.32098/mltj.04.2014.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  117. Noorani A, Goldring M, Jaggi A, Gibson J, Rees J, Bateman M, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: atraumatic shoulder instability. Shoulder Elbow 2019;11:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218815002 doi: 10.1177/1758573218815002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  118. Barbosa F, Swamy G, Salem H, Creswell T, Espag M, Tambe A, Clark D. Chronic adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder): comparative outcomes of treatment in patients with diabetes and obesity. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019;10:265–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  119. Hsu CL, Sheu WH. Diabetes and shoulder disorders. J Diabetes Investig 2016;7:649–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12491 doi: 10.1111/jdi.12491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  120. Saltychev M, Laimi K, Virolainen P, Fredericson M. Effectiveness of hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 2018;107:285–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496918772367 doi: 10.1177/1457496918772367. [DOI] [PubMed]
  121. Sinha R, Patel P, Rose N, Tuckett J, Banerjee AN, Williams J, et al. Analysis of hydrodilatation as part of a combined service for stiff shoulder. Shoulder Elbow 2017;9:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573216687273 doi: 10.1177/1758573216687273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  122. Heire P, Braham R, Mubashar M, Bhatti W. Ultrasound-guided Hydrodilatation for Adhesive Capsulitis – A Step-by-Step Guide. Paper presented at European Congress of Radiology, 4–8 March 2015, Vienna, Austria.
  123. Guyver PM, Bruce DJ, Rees JL. Frozen shoulder – a stiff problem that requires a flexible approach. Maturitas 2014;78:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009 doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  124. Arce G. Primary frozen shoulder syndrome: arthroscopic capsular release. Arthrosc Tech 2015;4:e717–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  125. Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow 2017;9:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573216676786 doi: 10.1177/1758573216676786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  126. Mubark IM, Ragab AH, Nagi AA, Motawea BA. Evaluation of the results of management of frozen shoulder using the arthroscopic capsular release. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2015;17:21–8. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1143530 doi: 10.5604/15093492.1143530. [DOI] [PubMed]
  127. Kanbe K. Clinical outcome of arthroscopic capsular release for frozen shoulder: essential technical points in 255 patients. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5 doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  128. Smitherman JA, Struk AM, Cricchio M, McFadden G, Dell RB, Horodyski M, Wright TW. Arthroscopy and manipulation versus home therapy program in treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. J Surg Orthop Adv 2015;24:69–74. https://doi.org/10.3113/JSOA.2015.0069 doi: 10.3113/JSOA.2015.0069. [DOI] [PubMed]
  129. De Carli A, Vadalà A, Perugia D, Frate L, Iorio C, Fabbri M, Ferretti A. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: manipulation and arthroscopic arthrolysis or intra-articular steroid injections? Int Orthop 2012;36:101–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1330-7 doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1330-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  130. Jacobs LG, Smith MG, Khan SA, Smith K, Joshi M. Manipulation or intra-articular steroids in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:348–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  131. Mukherjee RN, Pandey RM, Nag HL, Mittal R. Frozen shoulder – a prospective randomized clinical trial. World J Orthop 2017;8:394–9. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.394 doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  132. Mun SW, Baek CH. Clinical efficacy of hydrodistention with joint manipulation under interscalene block compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:1937–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed]
  133. Vastamäki H, Kettunen J, Vastamäki M. The natural history of idiopathic frozen shoulder: a 2- to 27-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:1133–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4 doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  134. Diercks RL, Stevens M. Gentle thawing of the frozen shoulder: a prospective study of supervised neglect versus intensive physical therapy in seventy-seven patients with frozen shoulder syndrome followed up for two years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13:499–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  135. Reeves B. The natural history of the frozen shoulder syndrome. Scand J Rheum 1975;4:193–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009747509165255 doi: 10.3109/03009747509165255. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES