Abstract
Background
Timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial to improve prognosis of ischemic stroke, making exploring factors associated with prognosis essential. Blood pressure variability (BPV) was reported to be associated with neurologic outcome, and basic researches on cardiovascular diseases found abnormal expression patterns of several factors including interleukin 10 (IL-10), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), and legumain which might be related to abnormal BPV but yet to prove in ischemic stroke. The study aimed to investigate whether IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain are associated with BPV and neurologic outcome of patients with ischemic stroke.
Patients and Methods
Newly diagnosed ischemic stroke patients admitted to the department of neurology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District in Shanghai between July 2017 and January 2019 were enrolled. IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain were detected and BPV was assessed within 72 hours after admission. All the patients were followed for neurologic outcomes at discharge and 6 months after admission based on the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Correlations of IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain with BPV were examined by Spearman correlation coefficient, and their associations with neurologic outcomes were evaluated by multivariable linear regression.
Results
A total of 349 patients with ischemic stroke were enrolled with an average age of 72.97±11.47 years. Compared with non-progressive ischemic stroke, patients with progressive ischemic stroke had significantly higher IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain on admission. MMP-9 was found to be positively correlated with BPV while no significant correlation was found for IL-10 and legumain with BPV. MMP-9 was associated with progressive ischemic stroke [β=0.23 (95% CI 0.11–0.35) per SD increase for MRS at discharge, and β=0.32 (95% CI 0.20–0.43) per SD increase for MRS at 6 months after admission].
Conclusion
Increased MMP-9 was associated with increased BPV and progressive ischemic stroke for patients with ischemic stroke, which might partially explain the effect of BPV on neurologic outcomes.
Keywords: interleukin 10, matrix metallopeptidase 9, legumain, blood pressure variability, ischemic stroke
Introduction
Stroke has become one of the major causes of death and serious disability for adults.1–3 Globally, ischemic stroke accounted for the most (68%) stroke cases,4 and in the United States this proportion was much higher (87%).5 The worldwide 30-day case fatality rate after first ischemic stroke was estimated to be 16–23%.6,7 For those survived, however, disability could be another serious concern.8 Obviously, due to its high morbidity and poor prognosis including high mortality and disability, ischemic stroke has become a serious public health problem. The ideal therapy to patients with ischemic stroke is to restore blood flow to the regions of brain that are ischemic but not yet infarcted within the narrow therapeutic window,9,10 but this is not always achievable, and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke therefore becomes another important issue in the management of ischemic stroke.11
Numerous predictors of prognosis were explored which on the one hand might improve the management of ischemic stroke by promoting timely intervention,12,13 and on the other hand could also increase understanding of mechanisms of the disease. Blood pressure variability (BPV) is one of the factors that related to prognosis of ischemic stroke. Several studies suggested that increased BPV was associated with poor neurologic outcome,14–16 while the mechanism behind is not fully understood. Researches on hypertension suggested injured endothelium due to highly fluctuating abnormal blood flow related to vascular inflammation,17,18 and meanwhile accumulating evidence suggested inflammation played a central role in all aspects of stroke including its initiation and progression.19 These evidences together suggested that increased BPV might aggravate the prognosis of ischemic stroke by inducing vascular inflammation, but relevant research is rare.
Interleukin-10 (IL-10) was found to play an important anti-inflammatory role in response to brain injury and to facilitate the resolution of inflammatory cascades therefore avoiding secondary brain damage.20 Increased matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) might be a potential trigger of the inflammatory response bridging between endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells.21 Legumain was found to promote atherosclerotic vascular remodeling by enhancing the inflammatory M1 phenotype and oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced foam cell formation in macrophages.22 The abnormal expression patterns of these factors might be related to abnormal BPV in ischemic stroke but yet to prove. The study aimed to investigate the associations of IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain with BPV and neurologic outcome of patients with ischemic stroke.
Patients and Methods
Patients
Newly diagnosed ischemic stroke patients admitted to the department of neurology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District in Shanghai between July 2017 to January 2019 were enrolled as study subjects. Detailed inclusion criteria included: 1) admission within 72 hours after the onset of ischemic stroke; 2) conforming to the diagnostic criteria of ischemic stroke based on Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018.23 Patients with severe chronic illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases, respiratory failure, cirrhosis, or renal insufficiency were excluded. The study was approved by ethics committee of Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District hospital and written informed consent were obtained from all the participants. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Detection of IL-10, MMP-9, Legumain, and BPV
After a fast for 8 hours, approximately 10 mL of peripheral blood was obtained using collection tube without additives from each subject within 72 hours after admission. Serum samples were separated by 2300g× 20min centrifugation. IL-10, MMP-9, legumain were then detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using kits from Lianke Biotech Co., Ltd following manufactures’ instructions.
TM-2430 ambulatory blood pressure monitor (A&D, Japan) was used for BPV examination. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed for each patient within 72 hours after admission. The cuff of the ambulatory blood pressure monitor is uniformly worn on the left upper arm of the patient, and blood pressure (including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)) were measured repeatedly every 30 minutes during daytime and every 60 minutes at night-time. During the monitoring period, the patient can move normally, but the patients were asked to remain their left upper arm still during automatic measurement to ensure reliable data.
Baseline Covariates
Information on the following baseline covariates were collected from regular clinical practice, including age, sex, current smoking status, alcohol use, comorbidity (hypertension, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cerebral infarction history, cerebral hemorrhage history), blood test (white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelet, random glucose, fasting blood sugar, hemoglobin A1c, C-reactive protein, international normalized ratio, D-dimer, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, homocysteine, cystatin C), location of ischemic stroke (i.e., anterior circulation or posterior circulation), and subtypes of ischemic stroke (i.e., large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, small-vessel occlusion, stroke of other determined etiology, or stroke of undetermined etiology). NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission and at discharge was also collected.
The patients were further categorized as non-progressive ischemic stroke and progressive ischemic stroke. Progressive ischemic stroke was defined as the condition of a patient gradually worsened within 1 week after admission, which was based on an increase of the NIHSS more than 2, or an increase of consciousness score or motor ability score more than 1, or newly appeared neurological deficits.24,25
Follow-Up and Study Outcomes
All the patients were followed for 6 months, and neurologic outcomes at discharge and 6 months after admission based on the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) were selected as the study outcomes.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation, otherwise as median (25%quartile – 75%quartile). Categorical variables were presented as a number and percentage. Comparison of continuous variables between groups was examined by t-test or rank sum test when appropriate. Comparison of categorical variables between groups was examined by chi-square test. Correlations between IL-10, MMP-9, legumain, BPV, and MRS (at discharge and 6 months after admission) were examined by Spearman correlation coefficient. Associations of IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain with MRS were evaluated by multivariable linear regression. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed by SPSS17.0 software.
Results
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Subjects
Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ischemic stroke were included, of which 265 patients were non-progressive ischemic stroke and 84 patients were progressive ischemic stroke. The average age of the study subjects was 72.97±11.47 years, and 57.88% (202/349) were male. As presented in Table 1, compared with non-progressive ischemic stroke, most baseline characteristics were similar, but patients with progressive ischemic stroke had significantly higher IL-10, MMP-9, and legumain on admission, and more patients had hypertension (85.71% versus 72.08%) and hyperlipidemia (51.19% versus 36.23%). No significant difference was found in location of ischemic stroke and subtypes of ischemic stroke.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Subjects
| Variables | All Subjects (n=349) | Non-Progressive Ischemic Stroke (n=265) | Progressive Ischemic Stroke (n=84) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 72.97±11.47 | 73.08±11.34 | 72.60±11.93 | 0.739 |
| Male | 202 (57.88%) | 158 (59.62%) | 44 (52.38%) | 0.241 |
| Current smoking | 112 (32.09%) | 86 (32.45%) | 26 (30.95%) | 0.797 |
| Alcohol use | 67 (19.20%) | 48 (18.11%) | 19 (22.62%) | 0.361 |
| Interleukin 10 (pg/mL) | 4.81 (2.78–7.72) | 4.28 (2.66–7.45) | 5.71 (4.08–8.10) | 0.004 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (mg/L) | 753.82 (639.88–954.83) | 715.65 (635.04–891.42) | 870.81 (698.83–1345.70) | <0.001 |
| Legumain (ng/mL) | 5.37 (4.52–7.02) | 5.14 (4.49–6.63) | 6.01 (4.64–11.41) | 0.002 |
| Comorbidity | ||||
| Hypertension | 263 (75.36%) | 191 (72.08%) | 72 (85.71%) | 0.011 |
| Coronary heart disease | 36 (10.32%) | 27 (10.19%) | 9 (10.71%) | 0.840 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 57 (16.33%) | 43 (16.23%) | 14 (16.67%) | 0.924 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 139 (39.83%) | 96 (36.23%) | 43 (51.19%) | 0.015 |
| Diabetes | 155 (44.41%) | 110 (41.51%) | 45 (53.57%) | 0.053 |
| Cerebral infarction history | 90 (25.79%) | 69 (26.04%) | 21 (25.00%) | 0.850 |
| Cerebral hemorrhage history | 4 (1.15%) | 2 (0.75%) | 2 (2.38%) | 0.245 |
| Blood test | ||||
| White blood cells (×109/L) | 6.73 (5.58–8.18) | 6.59 (5.56–7.98) | 6.99 (5.67–8.58) | 0.344 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 133 (121–145) | 132 (120–145) | 137 (124–147.5) | 0.101 |
| Platelet (×109/L) | 206 (171–245) | 205 (170–246) | 215.5 (172.75–243.25) | 0.357 |
| Random glucose (mmol/L) | 7.70 (6.30–11.40) | 7.60 (6.30–10.70) | 8.42 (6.28–13.67) | 0.078 |
| Fasting blood sugar (mmol/L) | 5.59 (4.88–7.47) | 5.49 (4.87–6.99) | 5.97 (5.07–8.72) | 0.018 |
| Hemoglobin A1C (%) | 6.20 (5.80–7.70) | 6.20 (5.80–7.50) | 6.30 (5.60–8.62) | 0.764 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 3.20 (1.30–7.80) | 3.10 (1.30–7.30) | 3.85 (1.25–9.43) | 0.709 |
| International Normalized Ratio | 0.93 (0.89–0.98) | 0.93 (0.89–0.98) | 0.94 (0.89–0.98) | 0.692 |
| D-dimer (mg/L) | 0.41 (0.23–0.98) | 0.39 (0.23–0.86) | 0.52 (0.22–1.42) | 0.230 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.57 (3.82–5.32) | 4.49 (3.82–5.23) | 4.78 (3.85–5.60) | 0.141 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.12 (0.93–1.33) | 1.10 (0.91–1.30) | 1.16 (1.04–1.44) | 0.005 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.68 (2.13–3.31) | 2.66 (2.23–3.28) | 2.79 (1.73–3.38) | 0.355 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.21 (0.92–1.71) | 1.19 (0.92–1.66) | 1.27 (0.92–1.93) | 0.496 |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 5.52 (4.40–6.70) | 5.52 (4.40–6.61) | 5.54 (4.36–6.86) | 0.665 |
| Creatinine (mmol/L) | 72.00 (60.20–86.00) | 73.30 (62.80–86.90) | 66.45 (54.33–80.55) | 0.003 |
| Uric acid (mmol/L) | 330.45 (273.68–392.32) | 332.00 (277.40–395.30) | 322.20 (258.65–380.55) | 0.176 |
| Homocysteine (μmol/L) | 15.40 (12.80–19.30) | 15.10 (12.70–18.90) | 16.00 (12.88–20.10) | 0.516 |
| Cystatin C (mg/L) | 0.86 (0.84–0.89) | 0.86 (0.83–0.89) | 0.86 (0.85–0.89) | 0.350 |
| Location of ischemic stroke | 0.126 | |||
| Anterior circulation | 225 (64.47%) | 165 (62.26%) | 60 (71.43%) | |
| Posterior circulation | 124 (35.53%) | 100 (37.74%) | 24 (28.57%) | |
| Subtypes of ischemic stroke | 0.079 | |||
| Large-artery atherosclerosis | 148 (42.41%) | 106 (40.00%) | 42 (50.00%) | |
| Cardioembolism | 62 (17.77%) | 46 (17.36%) | 16 (19.05%) | |
| Small-vessel occlusion | 133 (38.11%) | 108 (40.75%) | 25 (29.76%) | |
| Stroke of other determined etiology | 1 (0.29%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (1.19%) | |
| Stroke of undetermined etiology | 5 (1.43%) | 5 (1.89%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Note: A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Results of baseline BPV are presented in Table 2. Compared with non-progressive ischemic stroke, patients with progressive ischemic stroke had significantly higher SBP at admission, higher average SBP (24h), higher average SBP (day), and higher average SBP (night). Higher CV of average SBP (24h), CV of average SBP (day), and CV of average DBP (day) were also found in patients with progressive ischemic stroke comparing to patients with non-progressive ischemic stroke.
Table 2.
Blood Pressure Variability and Prognosis of the Study Subjects
| Variables | All Subjects (n=349) | Non-Progressive Ischemic Stroke (n=265) | Progressive Ischemic Stroke (n=84) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure variability | ||||
| SBP at admission, mmHg | 139.94±17.93 | 138.52±16.90 | 144.40±20.32 | 0.009 |
| DBP at admission, mmHg | 81.37±10.44 | 81.01±10.14 | 82.50±11.32 | 0.255 |
| Average SBP (24h), mmHg | 145.42±15.16 | 144.16±14.06 | 149.42±17.70 | 0.005 |
| CV of average SBP (24h) | 10.98±3.17 | 10.74±3.04 | 11.73±3.48 | 0.013 |
| Average DBP (24h), mmHg | 80.60±9.27 | 80.35±9.13 | 81.37±9.70 | 0.383 |
| CV of average DBP (24h) | 13.50±4.62 | 13.29±4.33 | 14.14±5.43 | 0.144 |
| Average SBP (day), mmHg | 146.70±15.28 | 145.50±14.27 | 150.50±17.67 | 0.009 |
| CV of average SBP (day) | 10.55±3.61 | 10.26±3.44 | 11.46±3.96 | 0.008 |
| Average DBP (day), mmHg | 81.27±9.53 | 81.09±9.39 | 81.82±10.01 | 0.541 |
| CV of average DBP (day) | 13.31±5.13 | 12.94±4.84 | 14.49±5.82 | 0.015 |
| Average SBP (night), mmHg | 141.72±18.44 | 140.23±17.18 | 146.42±21.38 | 0.007 |
| CV of average SBP (night) | 10.09±4.36 | 10.13±4.39 | 9.98±4.29 | 0.788 |
| Average DBP (night), mmHg | 78.77±11.43 | 78.37±11.35 | 80.05±11.62 | 0.240 |
| CV of average DBP (night) | 12.30±5.18 | 12.20±5.22 | 12.63±5.09 | 0.506 |
| NIH Stroke Scale | ||||
| At admission | 4 (2–6) | 4 (2–6) | 5 (3–9.25) | <0.001 |
| At discharge | 3 (2–6) | 3 (1–4) | 7 (4–10.25) | <0.001 |
| Modified Rankin Scale | ||||
| Before admission | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | 0.062 |
| At discharge | 2 (2–4) | 2 (1–3) | 4 (2–5) | <0.001 |
| After 6 months | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–2) | 3 (2–4) | <0.001 |
| Prognosis* | ||||
| Improved at discharge | 176 (50.43%) | 134 (50.57%) | 42 (50.00%) | 0.928 |
| Improved at 6 months | 253 (72.49%) | 202 (76.23%) | 51 (60.71%) | 0.006 |
Notes: *Improved prognosis was defined by the Modified Rankin Scale ≤2. A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CV, coefficients of variation.
Correlation Coefficient of IL-10, MMP-9, and Legumain with BPV
As presented in Table 3, MMP-9 was found to be positively correlated with CV of average SBP (24h) (ρ=0.3742, P<0.001), CV of average DBP (24h) (ρ=0.2201, P<0.001), CV of average SBP (day) (ρ=0.3162, P<0.001), CV of average DBP (day) (ρ=0.1905, P<0.001), CV of average SBP (night) (ρ=0.1875, P<0.001), CV of average DBP (night) (ρ=0.1340, P=0.012), while no significant correlation was found for IL-10 and legumain with BPV.
Table 3.
Correlation Coefficient of Interleukin 10, Legumain, Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 with Blood Pressure Variability
| Variables | Interleukin 10 (pg/mL) | Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 (mg/L) | Legumain (ng/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | P | Correlation | P | Correlation | P | |
| SBP at admission, mmHg | −0.0626 | 0.244 | 0.0144 | 0.789 | −0.0160 | 0.766 |
| DBP at admission, mmHg | −0.0555 | 0.301 | 0.0065 | 0.904 | 0.0138 | 0.798 |
| Average SBP (24h), mmHg | 0.0139 | 0.795 | 0.0507 | 0.345 | −0.0031 | 0.954 |
| CV of average SBP (24h) | 0.0405 | 0.451 | 0.3742 | <0.001 | 0.0003 | 0.995 |
| Average DBP (24h), mmHg | 0.0214 | 0.691 | 0.0498 | 0.354 | −0.0859 | 0.109 |
| CV of average DBP (24h) | −0.0505 | 0.347 | 0.2201 | <0.001 | 0.0007 | 0.989 |
| Average SBP (day), mmHg | 0.0125 | 0.816 | 0.0523 | 0.310 | −0.0068 | 0.899 |
| CV of average SBP (day) | 0.0498 | 0.353 | 0.3162 | <0.001 | −0.0006 | 0.990 |
| Average DBP (day), mmHg | 0.0290 | 0.589 | 0.0500 | 0.352 | −0.0842 | 0.117 |
| CV of average DBP (day) | −0.0543 | 0.312 | 0.1905 | <0.001 | 0.0144 | 0.788 |
| Average SBP (night), mmHg | 0.0166 | 0.757 | 0.0212 | 0.693 | 0.0030 | 0.955 |
| CV of average SBP (night) | −0.0841 | 0.117 | 0.1875 | <0.001 | 0.0021 | 0.969 |
| Average DBP (night), mmHg | −0.0086 | 0.872 | 0.0073 | 0.891 | −0.0468 | 0.383 |
| CV of average DBP (night) | −0.0465 | 0.387 | 0.1340 | 0.012 | 0.0119 | 0.824 |
Note: A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CV, coefficients of variation.
CV of average SBP (24h), CV of average SBP (day), and CV of average DBP (night) were also found to be positively correlated with MRS at discharge and at 6 months after admission, but CV of average DBP (24h) was only positively correlated with MRS at 6 months after admission (Table 4).
Table 4.
Correlation Coefficient of MRS with Blood Pressure Variability
| Variables | MRS at Discharge | MRS After 6 Months | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | P | Correlation | P | |
| SBP at admission, mmHg | 0.1030 | 0.055 | 0.0969 | 0.071 |
| DBP at admission, mmHg | −0.0345 | 0.521 | −0.0639 | 0.234 |
| Average SBP (24h), mmHg | 0.1574 | 0.003 | 0.1383 | 0.010 |
| CV of average SBP (24h) | 0.1727 | 0.001 | 0.1855 | <0.001 |
| Average DBP (24h), mmHg | 0.0754 | 0.160 | 0.0504 | 0.348 |
| CV of average DBP (24h) | 0.0951 | 0.076 | 0.1053 | 0.049 |
| Average SBP (day), mmHg | 0.1450 | 0.007 | 0.1399 | 0.009 |
| CV of average SBP (day) | 0.1671 | 0.002 | 0.1681 | 0.002 |
| Average DBP (day), mmHg | 0.0761 | 0.156 | 0.0535 | 0.319 |
| CV of average DBP (day) | 0.0643 | 0.231 | 0.0720 | 0.180 |
| Average SBP (night), mmHg | 0.1512 | 0.005 | 0.1063 | 0.047 |
| CV of average SBP (night) | 0.0680 | 0.205 | 0.0844 | 0.116 |
| Average DBP (night), mmHg | 0.0564 | 0.293 | 0.0267 | 0.619 |
| CV of average DBP (night) | 0.1227 | 0.022 | 0.1241 | 0.020 |
Note: A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Abbreviations: MRS, Modified Rankin Scale; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CV, coefficients of variation.
Associations of IL-10, MMP-9, and Legumain with Neurologic Outcomes
IL-10 and MMP-9 were positively correlated with MRS at discharge and at 6 months after admission, while no significant correlation was found for legumain (Table 5). The correlations were further examined in multivariable linear regression, but only MMP-9 was associated with progressive ischemic stroke [β=0.23 (95% CI 0.11–0.35) per SD increase for MRS at discharge, and β=0.32 (95% CI 0.20–0.43) per SD increase for MRS at 6 months after admission] after adjusted for age, sex, MRS before admission, and type of ischemic stroke (progressive or not) (Table 6).
Table 5.
Correlation Coefficient of Interleukin 10, Legumain, Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 with MRS
| Variables | Interleukin 10 (pg/mL) | Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 (mg/L) | Legumain (ng/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | P | Correlation | P | Correlation | P | |
| MRS at discharge | 0.1927 | <0.001 | 0.3770 | <0.001 | 0.0376 | 0.483 |
| MRS after 6 months | 0.1789 | <0.001 | 0.3816 | <0.001 | 0.0459 | 0.392 |
Note: A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Abbreviation: MRS, Modified Rankin Scale.
Table 6.
Association of Interleukin 10, Legumain, Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 with MRS
| Exposure | Crude | Adjust Model 1* | Adjust Model 2§ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | P | β | 95% CI | P | β | 95% CI | P | |
| MRS at discharge | |||||||||
| Interleukin 10 (per SD increase) | 0.25 | 0.11–0.40 | <0.001 | 0.12 | −0.01–0.25 | 0.065 | 0.04 | −0.07–0.16 | 0.438 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (per SD increase) | 0.62 | 0.49–0.75 | <0.001 | 0.39 | 0.26–0.52 | <0.001 | 0.23 | 0.11–0.35 | <0.001 |
| Legumain (per SD increase) | 0.14 | −0.01–0.29 | 0.060 | 0.15 | 0.03–0.28 | 0.018 | −0.07 | −0.18–0.05 | 0.274 |
| MRS after 6 months | |||||||||
| Interleukin 10 (per SD increase) | 0.26 | 0.12–0.41 | <0.001 | 0.11 | −0.01–0.23 | 0.071 | 0.04 | −0.06–0.15 | 0.437 |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (per SD increase) | 0.72 | 0.59–0.85 | <0.001 | 0.45 | 0.34–0.57 | <0.001 | 0.32 | 0.20–0.43 | <0.001 |
| Legumain (per SD increase) | 0.11 | −0.04–0.26 | 0.1382 | 0.12 | 0.01–0.24 | 0.037 | −0.07 | −0.18–0.04 | 0.224 |
Notes: *Adjusted for age, sex, and MRS before admission. §Adjusted for age, sex, MRS before admission, and type of ischemic stroke (progressive or not). A P-value <0.05 was presented in bold.
Abbreviations: MRS, Modified Rankin Scale; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
Discussion
In order to investigate the potential association of three inflammation-related factors (i.e., IL-10, MMP-9, legumain) with BPV and neurologic outcomes of ischemic stroke, in the study, we examined the correlations between IL-10, MMP-9, legumain with BPV and multivariable linear regression was employed to examine the associations of these factors with MRS, an index we selected to represent neurologic outcomes. The main finding of our study is that increased baseline MMP-9, which was positively correlated with BPV, was associated poor neurologic outcomes. This finding suggests that MMP-9 might be a useful prognosis predictor for ischemic stroke, and that the association between increased BPV and poor neurologic outcomes observed in patients with ischemic stroke might be partially related to the increased level of MMP-9.
Abnormal BPV was reported to be associated with poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke.14–16 For example, Minhas et al16 found that CV of SBP had a significant linear association with unfavorable shift of mRS at 90 days and CV of DBP over 24 hours post stroke was significantly associated with 3-month poor outcome. This is consistent with what we found in the study, but in our study CV of average DBP (24h) was only correlated with MRS after 6 months rather than MRS at discharge. Although this association looks robust since it has been observed in different studies, it remains unknown whether targeted strategies aimed at improving BPV could bring prognostic benefit in the management of ischemic stroke. One of the obstacles may be the unclear mechanism on how BPV influences prognosis of ischemic stroke. As far as we know, few researches were specifically performed to explore the mechanism in ischemic stroke. Based on evidence from researches on hypertension,17,18 we assumed that abnormal BPV triggered vascular inflammation could be a possible mechanism and selected three vascular inflammation-related biomarkers (i.e., IL-10, MMP-9, legumain) as proxies to explore. Although the study design of our study is only for examination of correlations, results of the study might provide inspirations for further exploration. In the study, we could see that compared with non-progressive ischemic stroke, there were more patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia for those who were categorized as progressive ischemic stroke. This again suggested BPV triggered vascular inflammation could be a reason for poor prognosis in ischemic stroke, since the three biomarkers we investigated were also reported to be involved in the regulation of vascular inflammation in hypertension and atherosclerosis.22,26–28
Some limitations should be noticed in our study. First, the study included a small sample size, which might result in a limited statistical power. Due to this concern, in the multivariable linear regression model, we only included several confounding factors and therefore the results could also be biased by residual confounding. Second, as an observational study, the relation we found among MMP-9, BPV and prognosis does not equal to a causation relation. In the study, it could be observed that patients with progressive ischemic stroke had a lower creatinine, which suggested inflammation in kidney disease could also be involved in the association between MMP-9 and prognosis. Further researches are needed to explore the role MMP-9 played in abnormal BPV and poor neurologic outcomes in ischemic stroke. It also remains unknown whether other inflammation-related factors are involved since there are several other proinflammatory factors associated with ischemic stroke.29,30 In addition, in the study, we only used MRS as a proxy for neurologic outcome, which also needs to be validated using other outcome variables in future studies.
Conclusion
Increased MMP-9 was associated with increased BPV and poor neurologic outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke, which might partially explain the effect of BPV on neurologic outcomes.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission Scientific Research Project (Youth) (grant number: 20174Y0161).
Disclosure
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Koton S, Schneider AL, Rosamond WD, et al. Stroke incidence and mortality trends in US communities, 1987 to 2011. JAMA. 2014;312(3):259–268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–448. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(5):e259–e281. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139–e596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(1):43–53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grysiewicz RA, Thomas K, Pandey DK. Epidemiology of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: incidence, prevalence, mortality, and risk factors. Neurol Clin. 2008;26(4):871–95, vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D’Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12(3):119–126. doi: 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00042-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zivin JA. Factors determining the therapeutic window for stroke. Neurology. 1998;50(3):599–603. doi: 10.1212/WNL.50.3.599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhaskar S, Stanwell P, Cordato D, Attia J, Levi C. Reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke: dawn of a new era? BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–e418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seners P, Baron J-C. Revisiting ‘progressive stroke’: incidence, predictors, pathophysiology, and management of unexplained early neurological deterioration following acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol. 2018;265(1):216–225. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8490-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S34–S40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mistry EA, Mehta T, Mistry A, et al. Blood pressure variability and neurologic outcome after endovascular thrombectomy: a secondary analysis of the BEST Study. Stroke. 2020;51(2):511–518. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Havenon A, Stoddard G, Saini M, et al. Increased blood pressure variability after acute ischemic stroke increases the risk of death: a secondary analysis of the virtual international stroke trial archive. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;8:2048004019856496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Minhas JS, Wang X, Lavados PM, et al. Blood pressure variability and outcome in acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the HeadPoST study. J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33(5):411–418. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0193-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dharmashankar K, Widlansky ME. Vascular endothelial function and hypertension: insights and directions. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12(6):448–455. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0150-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsuda K. Associations between inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in resistant hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29(11):e4. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shekhar S, Cunningham MW, Pabbidi MR, Wang S, Booz GW, Fan F. Targeting vascular inflammation in ischemic stroke: recent developments on novel immunomodulatory approaches. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;833:531–544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.06.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garcia JM, Stillings SA, Leclerc JL, et al. Role of interleukin-10 in acute brain injuries. Front Neurol. 2017;8:244. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ramella M, Boccafoschi F, Bellofatto K, et al. Endothelial MMP-9 drives the inflammatory response in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(12):5485–5495. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ozawa N, Sato Y, Mori Y, et al. Legumain promotes atherosclerotic vascular remodeling. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2195. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Neurology hSo, Society CS. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018. Chin J Neurol. 2018;51(9):666–682. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Davalos A, Toni D, Iweins F, Lesaffre E, Bastianello S, Castillo J. Neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: potential predictors and associated factors in the European cooperative acute stroke study (ECASS) I. Stroke. 1999;30(12):2631–2636. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kwan J, Hand P. Early neurological deterioration in acute stroke: clinical characteristics and impact on outcome. QJM. 2006;99(9):625–633. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lima VV, Zemse SM, Chiao CW, et al. Interleukin-10 limits increased blood pressure and vascular RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling in angiotensin II-infused mice. Life Sci. 2016;145:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Caligiuri G, Rudling M, Ollivier V, et al. Interleukin-10 deficiency increases atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and low-density lipoproteins in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Mol Med. 2003;9(1):10–17. doi: 10.1007/BF03402102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Florence JM, Krupa A, Booshehri LM, Allen TC, Kurdowska AK, Hribal ML. Metalloproteinase-9 contributes to endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis via protease activated receptor-1. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shaafi S, Sharifipour E, Rahmanifar R, et al. Interleukin-6, a reliable prognostic factor for ischemic stroke. Iran J Neurol. 2014;13(2):70–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bokhari FA, Shakoori TA, Butt A, Ghafoor F. TNF-alpha: a risk factor for ischemic stroke. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(2):111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]