Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Nov 20;46(2):519–523. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13311

Breakthrough venous thromboembolic events in five patients with COVID‐19 on direct oral anticoagulants

Paul Lewis 1,, Jennifer L Tharp 1
PMCID: PMC7753371  PMID: 33217032

Abstract

What is known and objective

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidance for VTE prophylaxis continues to evolve, including addressing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) continued upon hospitalization.

Case summaries

We present 5 patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 while on DOACs. Four patients had atrial fibrillation and had a previous VTE. Four patients developed acute VTE and one developed stroke‐like symptoms. Monitoring D‐dimer assisted with the detection of VTE. Three patients died, and two were discharged alive.

What is new and conclusion

Therapeutic failure with DOACs appears to be commonplace in COVID‐19. Further research is needed to determine whether there is an underlying cause to this association.

Keywords: factor Xa Inhibitors, heparin, low molecular weight, pulmonary embolism, SARS‐CoV‐2


Heparin‐based therapies possess anticoagulant and anti‐inflammatory properties which may be preferred over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) in COVID‐19. D‐dimers are often used to supplement the evaluation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. This case series describes a high incidence of breakthrough VTE in patients on DOACs.

graphic file with name JCPT-46-519-g001.jpg

1. WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), has created unique challenges since its discovery in Wuhan, China. 1 Evidence demonstrates significant cardiovascular complications, particularly coagulopathy. A hypercoagulable state predisposes patients to venous thromboemboli (VTE) via endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, platelet activation and venous stasis. 2

For hospitalized patients not previously on anticoagulation, the need for VTE prophylaxis is well‐established. 3 Therapeutic options include unfractionated heparin (UHF), low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) gives preference to UHF or LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in both critically ill and non‐critically ill patients. 4 , 5 Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are cautioned due to drug‐drug interactions. 4 The American College of Chest Physicians recommends LMWH, UHF and fondaparinux over DOACs and LMWH and fondaparinux over UHF to limit healthcare worker exposure. 6 Caution with DOACs is again advised due to the possibility of hemodynamic instability, drug‐drug interactions and risk of acute kidney injury altering pharmacokinetics and increasing bleeding risk. 6

Despite the abundance of guidance for initiating VTE prophylaxis in patients not previously on anticoagulation, there is little direction for patients admitted on therapeutic DOACs for other indications (nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and previous VTE). Current evidence cautions against DOACs for increased bleeding rather than therapeutic failure. Guidance for anticoagulation in this scenario is not well‐established, and thus directed to standard of care for hospitalized non‐COVID patients. 3 Herein, we describe 5 cases of patients taking DOACs for other indications who developed breakthrough VTEs.

2. CASE PRESENTATIONS

This case series occurred at a regional COVID care facility. As part of standard hospitalized care, all patients are evaluated for appropriate VTE prophylaxis or treatment therapy daily. Patients who are on home anticoagulation are continued on that agent. There have been 14 patients in our cohort who were admitted on DOACs. Five patients (35.7%) either presented with DOAC failure or developed a VTE during their hospitalization. Full case details are presented in Table 1. D‐dimers were trended in Frigure 1, often used to supplement the evaluation of VTE prophylaxis.

TABLE 1.

Patient details

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5
Demographics 77‐year‐old white male 70‐year‐old white male 76‐year‐old white male 80‐year‐old white male 92‐year‐old white male
Past medical history Atrial fibrillation, dyslipidaemia Atrial fibrillation CAD, CHF, COPD, diabetes type 2, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, Atrial fibrillation, CHF, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, asthma, diabetes type 2 CAD, CHF, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, history of pulmonary embolus Atrial fibrillation, CAD, CHF, dyslipidaemia, CLL, CAD s/p CABG, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, sick sinus syndrome s/p PPM, HLD, HLD, paroxysmal Afib, anaemia of chronic disease and chronic pleural effusion.
Home anticoagulant Apixaban 5 mg twice daily Apixaban 5 mg twice daily Rivaroxaban 20 mg daily Rivaroxaban 20 mg daily Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily
Other home medications

Metoprolol

Atorvastatin

Aspirin, carvedilol, dulaglutide, furosemide, insulin glargine, lansoprazole, losartan, montelukast, simvastatin Atorvastatin, bisoprolol, buspirone, digoxin, dulaglutide, escitalopram, esomeprazole, insulin lispro, levothyroxine, losartan, pregabalin, ropinirole, tamsulosin, trazodone Amiodarone, aspirin, atorvastatin, furosemide, insulin aspart, insulin detemir, levothyroxine, mirtazapine, sertraline Carvedilol, ferrous sulphate
COVID/infection‐related therapies

Convalescent plasma

Dexamethasone

Cefepime

Convalescent plasma

Dexamethasone

Convalescent plasma

Dexamethasone

Cefepime, linezolid

Convalescent plasma Dexamethasone

Cefepime, linezolid

Convalescent plasma Dexamethasone Remdesivir

Cefepime, linezolid

Highest Oxygen requirement prior to VTE Supplemental oxygen (15 L/min) Supplemental oxygen (10 L/min) High flow nasal cannula Mechanical ventilation High flow nasal cannula
Reason for VTE workup D‐dimer > 5000 ng/mL D‐dimer 2721 ng/mL Shortness of breath, D‐dimer > 5000 ng/mL Increasing O2 requirement, unable to safely perform CT Left‐sided facial droop with aphasia, D‐dimer 3160 ng/mL
VTE findings Chest CT demonstrated bilateral upper lobe pulmonary emboli Venous ultrasound demonstrating partially occluding and soft echogenic material in the lumen of the popliteal and femoral veins Chest CT demonstrated small pulmonary embolism in distal segmental and subsegmental pulmonary artery branches of right lower lobe Venous ultrasound demonstrated echogenic material in lumen of femoral vein, appears acute on chronic Clinical diagnosis of a stroke. Care was withdrawn and no further imaging was performed
Treatment rendered Change to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12hr Change to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hr Change to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hr Change to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hr Care withdrawn
Highest oxygen requirement after VTE Mechanical ventilation Supplemental oxygen (5 L/min) Mechanical ventilation Mechanical ventilation Care withdrawn
Patient outcome Deceased Discharge to skilled nursing facility Discharge to inpatient rehabilitation Deceased Deceased

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

D‐dimer trend. Note that patient 3 had a single D‐dimer value on day 15 reported as >5000 ng/mL

Patient 1 presented 4 days after diagnosis. He was continued on home apixaban 5 mg twice daily for chronic atrial fibrillation. Initial D‐dimer was less than 200 ng/mL. On day 14, D‐dimer rose to 2746 ng/mL and then greater than 5000 ng/mL, prompting a chest computed tomography (CT) for pulmonary embolism (PE) protocol. On day 15, the CT demonstrated bilateral upper lobe pulmonary emboli. Apixaban was discontinued, and enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 h was initiated. The patient's respiratory status continued to worsen, requiring mechanical ventilation. He then developed multi‐system organ failure and was transitioned to comfort care.

Patient 2 presented 2 days after COVID‐19 symptom onset and was continued on home apixaban 5 mg twice daily for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Initial D‐dimer was less than 200 ng/mL and increased to 2721 ng/mL, prompting further investigation. Venous Doppler ultrasound of the lower extremities demonstrated partially occluding and soft echogenic material in the lumen of the popliteal and femoral veins. Apixaban was discontinued, and enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 h and warfarin were initiated. The patient was discharged to a skilled nursing facility.

Patient 3 initially presented 14 days after diagnosis of COVID‐19 diagnosis with worsening shortness of breath. The patient was on rivaroxaban 20 mg daily for atrial fibrillation. Initial D‐dimer was greater than 5000 ng/mL, leading to a chest CT for PE protocol, which demonstrated small pulmonary embolism in distal segmental and subsegmental pulmonary artery branches of right lower lobe. Rivaroxaban was discontinued, and enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 h was initiated. The patient was eventually changed back to rivaroxaban and discharged to inpatient rehabilitation.

Patient 4 initially presented with increasing shortness of breath about a week after symptom onset. The patient was on rivaroxaban 20 mg daily for history of DVT. The patient was mechanically ventilated upon admission and changed to enoxaparin. Chest CT for PE protocol could not be performed due to patient acuity and poor prognosis. Venous Doppler ultrasound was arranged on day 3 in which demonstrated acute on chronic DVT of the femoral vein. Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily was continued until care was withdrawn.

Patient 5 presented with productive cough for the past 10 days. The patient was on apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for atrial fibrillation, dose adjusted by his outpatient cardiologist. On admission, his dose was increased to 5 mg twice daily. Initially, the patient did not appear ill, only complaining of mild diarrhoea and a slight productive cough. He remained relatively stable until day 4 when his O2 requirement increased. Increased swelling and erythema were noted in the right lower extremity which was preliminarily read as a DVT. The patient was temporarily switched to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily and considered an apixaban failure. Venous Doppler ultrasound report stated findings were consistent with a chronic DVT, prompting conversion back to apixaban 5 mg twice daily. On day 8, D‐dimer rose to over 3100 and the patient displayed significant left‐sided facial droop and left‐sided hemiplegia. The patient was somnolent and poorly communicating. He was clinically diagnosed with a stroke. Care was withdrawn, per his wishes.

3. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This case series describes a relatively high percentage of DOAC failure in COVID‐19–positive patients admitted to an inpatient facility. Concern of DOAC efficacy in COVID‐19 has been previously described. Di Tano and colleagues described a breakthrough CT‐diagnosed PE while on rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation in a 79‐year‐old male. The patient was subsequently switched to enoxaparin. 7

While drug‐drug interactions are a known cause of DOAC failure, our case series does not include patients with significant drug‐drug interactions. Additionally, this case series involves predominantly non‐critically ill patients on DOACs at the time of new thrombosis, which should lessen the theoretical risks of decreased oral absorption of medications in the absence of critical illness as a reason for DOAC failure. The exact mechanism for DOAC failure is unknown. Drug‐drug interactions and medication compliance should always be considered in a therapeutic failure. In the absence of inadequate dosing, one possible mechanism that explains this phenomenon is that the SARS‐CoV‐2 infects the host cells using the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which is expressed in several organs and the endothelial cells of the vasculature. 8 Direct viral infection of these endothelial cells leads diffuse endothelial inflammation or endotheliitis. 8 While the DOACs are exclusively anticoagulants, heparin and LMWH possess both anticoagulant and anti‐inflammatory properties. 9

Our understanding of the pleiotropic effects of heparin continues to evolve. A systematic review found that heparin can decrease the level of inflammatory biomarkers but ultimately concluded that further research is needed from larger studies. 9 Currently, proposed mechanisms include inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis, neutralization of inflammatory cytokines and leucocyte migration, inhibition of the complement factor C5a and sequestration of acute‐phase proteins. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 These effects are better described in sepsis, a disease known for interacting effects of inflammation and coagulation. 11

Treatment for VTE should target full anticoagulation, though choice of agent should balance patient factors such as concomitant organ dysfunctions with the need to try to minimize healthcare worker exposure with frequent laboratory draws. For those that are critically ill, parenteral anticoagulation with LMWH or fondaparinux is recommended over oral therapy. 6 For patients that clot while on home therapies, the chest guidelines provide a framework for management. 6 Specifically, if VTE occurs on a DOAC, a change to full dose LMWH or UHF is warranted. If VTE occurs on LMHW, dose increase of 25 to 30% should be considered. 6

There are several limitations including this being an all‐male, all‐white, elderly population. Given our small cohort, it is unknown whether age, race and sex contributed to these findings. Data regarding prehospital outpatient management are unavailable, and we are unable to speculate on non‐hospitalized rates. The timing of patient 4 is somewhat obscure. We debated not including this case. But ultimately the prescribers felt, in their professional judgement, that this was rivaroxaban failure and was therefore included. Additionally, association does not prove causality. Further research is needed from larger institutions to validate or refute our findings. In the interim, we are considering converting patients admitted with COVID‐19 on DOACs to therapeutic UHF or LMWH, which is currently a circulating proposal. 16 , 17

The United Kingdom National Health Service is closest to adopting the recommendation to convert DOACs to therapeutic UHF or LMWH. 18 They again highlight the possibility of drug‐drug interactions with DOACs, elude to the additional anti‐inflammatory properties of UHF and LMWH, and recommend that DOACs “could be switched” to a LMWH. 18 However, the United States National Institutes of Health make no recommendations outside of standard of care. 3 The American College of Cardiology does not mention DOACs and states that the optimal prophylactic strategy requires further investigation. 2

Based on this case series, there appears to be the possibility that COVID‐19 may lead to higher rates of DOAC failure. Although an exact mechanism is unknown, DOACs have no effect on endotheliitis while UHF and LMWH have pleiotropic anti‐inflammatory properties. Further research is needed to evaluate these claims. In the interim, we suggest a low threshold for changing hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 on DOACs to UHF or LMWH.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no funding and no conflicts of interest.

Lewis P, Tharp JL. Breakthrough venous thromboembolic events in five patients with COVID‐19 on direct oral anticoagulants. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46:519–523. 10.1111/jcpt.13311

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D, et al. COVID‐19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow‐Up: JACC State‐of‐the‐Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(23):2950‐2973. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. COVID‐19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available at https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed September 9, 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Spyropoulos AC, Levy JH, Ageno W, et al. Subcommittee on Perioperative, Critical Care Thrombosis, Haemostasis of the Scientific, Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Scientific and Standardization Committee communication: Clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(8):1859‐1865. 10.1111/jth.14929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1023‐1026. 10.1111/jth.14810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan S, et al. Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of VTE in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2020;158(3):1143‐1163. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Di Tano G, Moschini L, Loffi M, Testa S, Danzi GB. Late Pulmonary Embolism after COVID‐19 Pneumonia despite Adequate Rivaroxaban Treatment. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020;7(7): 001790. 10.12890/2020_001790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID‐19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417‐1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mousavi S, Moradi M, Khorshidahmad T, Motamedi M. Anti‐Inflammatory Effects of Heparin and Its Derivatives: A Systematic Review. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2015;2015:507151. 10.1155/2015/507151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Young E. The anti‐inflammatory effects of heparin and related compounds. Thromb Res. 2008;122(6):743‐752. 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li X, Ma X. The role of heparin in sepsis: much more than just an anticoagulant. Br J Haematol. 2017;179(3):389‐398. 10.1111/bjh.14885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Poterucha TJ, Libby P, Goldhaber SZ. More than an anticoagulant: Do heparins have direct anti‐inflammatory effects? Thromb Haemost. 2017;117(3):437‐444. 10.1160/TH16-08-0620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Esmon CT. Targeting factor Xa and thrombin: impact on coagulation and beyond. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(4):625‐633. 10.1160/TH13-09-0730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Goldberg R, Meirovitz A, Hirshoren N, et al. Versatile role of heparanase in inflammation. Matrix Biol. 2013;32(5):234‐240. 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Thachil J. Clinical differentiation of anticoagulant and non‐anticoagulant properties of heparin [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 29]. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(9):2424‐2425. 10.1111/jth.14933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Testa S, Paoletti O, Giorgi‐Pierfranceschi M, Pan A. Switch from oral anticoagulants to parenteral heparin in SARS‐CoV‐2 hospitalized patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2020;15(5):751‐753. 10.1007/s11739-020-02331-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Allione A, Giamello JD, Paglietta G, Bernardi S, Cavalot G. Switch from oral anticoagulants to parenteral heparin in SARS‐CoV‐2 hospitalized patients: comment. Intern Emerg Med. 2020;1–2. 10.1007/s11739-020-02373-5. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. National Health Service . Thromboprophylaxis, coagulopathy management and thrombosis in COVID‐19 infection. Available at: https://www.wsh.nhs.uk/covid‐staff‐zone/Guidelines‐SOPs‐clinical‐info/Docs/Clinical‐guideline/CG10393‐COVID‐Thromboprophylaxis‐and‐Anticoagulation‐in‐COVID‐19‐infections.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2020. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES