Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 May 7;85(24):15872–15884. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00703

Reagent Controlled Glycosylations for the Assembly of Well-Defined Pel Oligosaccharides

Liming Wang 1, Yongzhen Zhang 1, Herman S Overkleeft 1, Gijsbert A van der Marel 1, Jeroen D C Codée 1,*
PMCID: PMC7754192  PMID: 32375481

Abstract

graphic file with name jo0c00703_0006.jpg

A new additive, methyl(phenyl)formamide (MPF), is introduced for the glycosylation of 2-azido-2-deoxyglucose building blocks. A linear α-(1,4)-glucosamine tetrasaccharide was assembled to prove the utility of MPF. Next, a hexasaccharide fragment of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa exopolysaccharide Pel was assembled using a [2 + 2 + 2] strategy modulated by MPF. The used [galactosazide-α-(1,4)-glucosazide] disaccharide building blocks were synthesized using a 4,6-O-DTBS protected galactosyl azide donor.

Introduction

Pel is one of the exopolysaccharides that is involved in the biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis patients.1 Pel is a linear polysaccharide composed of 1,4-linked α-N-acetyl galactosamine (GalNAc) and α-N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues, present in a ±6:1 ratio, of which some of the residues have been deacetylated to generate positively charged galactosamine (GalN) and glucosamine (GlcN) moieties (Figure 1).1b Well-defined Pel fragments can be used to unravel their role in biofilm formation to study their biosynthesis and possibly as synthetic antigens in the development of a (semi)-synthetic vaccine against P. aeruginosa. Because of the random distribution of the monosaccharides in Pel, it is impossible to isolate well-defined oligosaccharides from natural sources, and therefore, organic synthesis is necessary to provide these structures.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Repeating structures of Pel.

The key challenge in the generation of these oligosaccharides is the stereoselective construction of the 1,2-cis-glycosidic linkages. Four kinds of cis-glycosidic linkages, namely α-d-GlcN-(1 → 4)-d-GlcN, α-d-GlcN-(1 → 4)-d-GalN, α-d-GalN-(1 → 4)-d-GlcN, and α-d-GalN-(1 → 4)-d-GalN have to be constructed. Zhang et al. recently reported an effective synthetic strategy to assemble galactosaminogalactans (GAGs), fungal polysaccharides composed of 1,4-linked α-d-Gal, α-d-GalN, and α-d-GalNAc moieties.2 For the formation of the 1,2-cis linkages in these structures, 4,6-di-tert-butylsilylene (4,6-O-DTBS) protected GalN donors were used to control the selectivity.3 This strategy allowed the use of galactosamine donors bearing differently masked amine functionalities. Galactosazide and trichloroacetyl protected GalN donors were used to combine GalN and GalNAc at predetermined sites in the target GAG oligosaccharides. Of note, the stereodirecting capacity of the DTBS group in GalN donors effectively overrides the neighboring group participation by C2-particpating functionalities such as the trichloroacetamide. Thus, DTBS-GalN donors also represent attractive building blocks for Pel assembly. For the stereoselective introduction of α-d-GlcN linkages, no general solution exists, even though the construction of this type of glycosidic linkage has attracted significant attention,4,5 as it is present in many important natural polysaccharides and glycoconjugates such as heparin, heparan sulfate,6 GPI anchors, and various bacterial polysaccharides.7

Additive controlled glycosylations are gaining increasing interest for the stereoselective construction of glycosidic linkages.8 In these approaches, the nature of the additive determines the reactivity of in situ formed glycosylating species, and the influence of the additive can be tuned to match the reactivity of the glycosyl donor9 and acceptor10 building blocks. We have recently reported on the fully stereoselective assembly of a branched α-glucan with an α-(1 → 4)-linked backbone from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, α-(1,3)-glucans from the Aspergillus fumigatus fungal cell wall as well as the assembly of α-(1,3)-glucans found attached to lipoteichoic acids of Enterococcus faecalis.11 The synthetic strategy used in these approaches hinged on the use of additive controlled glycosylation reactions in combination with the use of a single benzyl-type protecting group (Bn, PMB, Nap). For glycosylations with relatively reactive primary alcohol acceptors, the trimethylsilyl iodide (TMSI)-triphenylphosphine oxide (Ph3P=O) activator couple was used, while the condensations with less reactive secondary alcohols required the use of the trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH)-dimethylformamide (DMF) pair. The successful construction of multiple 1,4-α-glucosidic linkages was an incentive to explore this strategy for the assembly of the Pel oligosaccharides. Mong and coworkers previously described how formamide additives can be used for the construction of 1,2-cis-GalN3 and GlcN3 linkages. They introduced N-formyl-morpholine (NFM) to modulate the reactivity of tri-O-benzyl GlcN3 and 4,6-benzylidene-GalN3 donors and showed that glycosylations mediated by NFM proceeded with higher stereoselectivity than the corresponding DMF-modulated condensations.7c Because of the stronger electron withdrawing effect of the azide group with respect to a benzyl ether, 2-azido donors are generally less reactive than their 2-O-benzyl counterparts. This lower reactivity can be counterbalanced by the use of a somewhat less nucleophilic additive, resulting in a better leaving group Y, thereby explaining why NFM outperforms DMF in these glycosylations (see Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Relative Reactivity of DMF and NFM Glycosyl Adducts.

Scheme 1

We here describe a strategy to synthesize Pel oligosaccharides using additive-controlled glycosylations to match the reactivities of the GlcN3 donor and the Pel acceptors. Because of the relatively low nucleophilicity of the GlcN3-C4-OH and especially the GalN3-C4-OH, a new additive is introduced that generates intermediates that are more reactive than the previously introduced DMF and NFM-imidinium ions.

Results and Discussion

First, we paid attention to the formation of α-d-GlcN-(1 → 4)-d-GlcN linkages. In line with previous work, solely benzyl type protecting groups (PMB, Nap, Bn) were used (besides the azide at C2) to generate orthogonally protected building blocks of uniform reactivity. With donor 1 and acceptor 4 (see SI for the syntheses of these building blocks), DMF was investigated as an additive to control the selectivity according to previous successful experiments. Thus, donor α-d-GlcN 1, acceptor 4, and the additive were mixed in DCM with molecular sieves and cooled to −78 °C. Next, TfOH was added, and after stirring for 0.5 h, the mixture was placed at 0 °C and allowed to stir for 24 h. As shown in Table 1, this produced the desired disaccharide product 8 with complete α-selectivity, but the yield was only 32% (entry 1). Performing the reaction at room temperature did not lead to erosion of stereoselectivity but only marginally improved the yield (entry 2). Likely, the low reactivity of the donor and acceptor led to the observed poor yield, and NFM was therefore probed as additive.6c Use of this additive provided complete α-selectivity and raised the yield of the condensation to 55% yield. To further improve the reaction, a slightly less nucleophilic additive was sought, and N-methyl-N-phenylformamide (MPF) was explored. It was expected that the imidinium ion formed from this additive would be more reactive because the aniline-type nitrogen would be less capable of supporting the (partial) positive charge in the ion (see Scheme 1). The reaction of donor 1 and acceptor 4 proceeded with excellent yield (91%) when performed at 0 °C, and the disaccharide 8 was obtained with 15:1 α:β-selectivity (entry 4). Although the stereoselectivity of this condensation is somewhat less than the DMF or NFM mediated glycosylations, the improved yield allows for an overall more productive reaction.12

Table 1. Glycosylation between 2-Azido Glu/Gal Donors and 4-OH-2-azido Glu/Gal Acceptors.

graphic file with name jo0c00703_0005.jpg

entry donor acceptor conc (mmol/mL) additive equiv T (°C) product yield (%)a α:βb
1 1 4 0.1 DMF 16 0 8 32 >20:1
2 1 4 0.1 DMF 16 rt 8 38 >20:1
3 1 4 0.1 NFM 16 rt 8 55 >20:1
4 1 4 0.1 MPF 16 0 8 91 ∼15:1
5 2 5 0.1 DMF 16 0 8 23 6:1
6 2 5 0.1 NFM 16 0 9 24 6:1
7 2 5 0.1 MPF 16 0 9 83 5:1
8 2 5 0.1 MPF 16 –10 9 43 10:1
9 2 5 0.2 MPF 16 –10 9 88 10:1
10 3 6 0.1 MPF 16 –10 10 88 8:1
11 3 7 0.1 MPF 16 –10 11 80 4:1
a

Isolated yield.

b

The α:β ratio was determined by 1H NMR.

Next, our attention was turned to the formation of the α-GlcN-(1 → 4)-GalN linkage exploring the additives as described above. First, donor 2 was coupled with acceptor 5 using DMF to provide product 9 in low yield and poor selectivity (Table 1, entry 5). The use of NFM instead of DMF did not improve the outcome of this glycosylation (entry 6). Likely, the poor reactivity of the GalN3-C4-OH hampers the union of the two carbohydrate building blocks. Next, the use of MPF was explored. At 0 °C, disaccharide 9 was obtained in high yield (83%) but with moderate α:β-selectivity (5:1). Performing the same reaction at −10 °C increased the α-selectivity (α:β = 10:1) but led to a relatively low yield (43%, entry 8). To increase the yield of the reaction, the concentration was raised from 0.1 to 0.2 M (entry 9). This led to the formation of the desired compound 9 with a yield of 88% and a 10:1 α:β ratio. Having defined adequate conditions for the construction of α-GlcN-(1 → 4)-GlcN and α-GlcN-(1 → 4)-GalN linkages, the use of MPF in combination with galactosazide donor 3 was explored for the construction of the target α-GalN-(1 → 4)-GlcN and α-GalN-(1 → 4)-GalN linkages. Under the conditions established above, donor 3 was coupled with glucosyl acceptor 6 to give the disaccharide 10 in excellent yield and 8:1 α/β-stereo selectivity (entry 10). Contrary, disaccharide 11, formed from donor 3 and galactosyl acceptor 7, was obtained with relatively poor selectivity (α:β = 4:1, entry 11). From these model reactions, it can be concluded that three out of four Pel-type linkages can effectively be installed using the MPF-mediated glycosylations. For the α-GalN-(1 → 4)-GalN linkages, the previously reported approach using 4,6-O-DTBS galactosamine donors is clearly superior.

Next, we probed the robustness of the MPF-mediated protocol in the synthesis of Pel-type oligosaccharides. First, the assembly of an all-1,2-cis linked tetraglucosamine was explored, as depicted in Scheme 2. Thus, donor 1 and acceptor 4 were coupled under the above identified reaction conditions to provide the desired disaccharide 8. The PMB was removed using a catalytic amount of HCl to give disaccharide acceptor 12 in 88% yield.13 Next, compound 12 was glycosylated with donor 1 under the MPF conditions to form the desired trisaccharide 13 in 83% yield and excellent stereoselectivity (α:β > 19:1). Repetition of the deprotection and glycosylation reactions then uneventfully provided tetrasaccharide 15. The successful assembly of this tetrasaccharide indicates that the yield and stereoselectivity do not decrease with the growing of the sugar chain.

Scheme 2. Assembly of an α-Glucosazide Tetrasaccharide Using MPF Mediated Glycosylations.

Scheme 2

(a) MPF, TfOH, DCM, −78to 0 °C, 8: 91%, α:β = 15:1; 13: 83%, α:β > 19:1; 15: 90%, α:β > 20:1. (b) 0.2 M HCl/HFIP, TES, HFIP/DCM, 12: 88%; 14: 78%.

Next, the synthesis of a Pel hexasaccharide featuring both GalN and GlcN residues was undertaken. A [2 + 2 + 2] strategy was designed to streamline the assembly of the structures, building on MFP-mediated glycosylations of the GalN3-GlcN3 donor 23. The procedure for the synthesis of the required building blocks 23 and 26 is depicted in Scheme 3A and B. First, donor 16 was coupled with glucoazide 17 in a chemoselective glycosylation to form disaccharide 18 as a single anomer. Next, the silylidene ketal was cleaved with HF-pyridine, after which a benzyl ether was regioselectively introduced under the aegis of Taylor’s borinic acid catalyst.14 Protection of the remaining C4′-OH with a naphthyl group delivered compound 21. Next, the anomeric thiophenol group was removed using N-iodosuccinimide in acetone/water, and the resulting hydroxyl group turned into the desired N-phenyltrifluoroimidate functionality to provide donor 23. Acceptor 26 was obtained from donor 16 and acceptor 4. These two building blocks were united to stereoselectively provide disaccharide 24. Removal of the silylidene ketal and introduction of the C6′-O-benzyl ether as described above provided 26. With building blocks 23 and 26 in hand, the assembly of the target hexasaccharides was undertaken (Scheme 3C). First, donor 23 was glycosylated with acceptor 26 using MPF as additive at −10 °C at a 0.2 M concentration to form tetrasaccharide 27 in 89% yield as a 10:1 α/β-mixture. Then, the Nap ether was removed using HCl and triethylsilane in DCM/HFIP to give the tetrasaccharide acceptor 28. Compound 28 was treated with donor 23 under the optimal MPF-mediated glycosylation conditions to deliver hexasaccharide 29 in high yield and stereoselectivity. Reduction of the six azides and removal of the benzyl ester and ethers were accomplished in a one-step reduction to give the compound 30, of which the amino groups were acetylated with acetic anhydride to afford the Pel structure 31.

Scheme 3. (A) Synthesis of Donor 23, (B) Synthesis of Acceptor 26, and (C) Assembly of Pel Fragment 31.

Scheme 3

(a) TfOH, DCM, 18: 70%; 24: 92%. (b) HF-pyridine, THF, 19: 98%, 25: 91%. (c) BnBr, borinic acid-catalyzed, K2CO3, KI, CH3CN, 60 °C, 20: 96%; 26: 95%. (d) NapBr, NaH, DMF, 21: 93%. (e) NIS, acetone, H2O. (f) 2,2,2-Trifluoro-N-phenylacetimidoyl chloride, Cs2CO3, acetone, 23: 83% over two steps. (g) MPF, TfOH, DCM, −10 °C, 48 h, 27: 89%, α:β = 10:1; 29: 91%, α:β = 10:1. (h) 0.2 M HCl/HFIP, TES, HFIP/DCM, 28: 73%. (i) H2, Pd(OH)2/C, CH3COOH, THF/H2O/t-BuOH, 30: 76%. (k) Ac2O, NaHCO3, H2O, 31: 86%.

Conclusion

In conclusion, MPF is here reported for the first time as a moderator to enable the stereoselective construction of α-GlcN3 linkages. This additive complements previously introduced glycosylation additives such as DMF and NFM and expands the “nucleophilic additive toolbox” that can be used to match the reactivity of glycosyl donor–acceptor pairs. The applicability of the MPF-mediated glycosylations in oligosaccharide synthesis has been demonstrated by the hand of the assembly of Pel-type oligosaccharides. A linear glucosazide tetrasaccharide was assembled through highly stereoselective glycosylation reactions, using building blocks solely equipped with benzyl type (Bn and PMB) hydroxyl protecting groups. A [2 + 2 + 2] strategy was developed for the assembly of a (GalN-GlcN)3 hexasaccharide in which the α-GlcN linkages were constructed in glycosylation reactions using MPF as an additive.

Experiment Section

General Experimental Procedures

All reagents were of commercial grade and used as received. All moisture sensitive reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere. DCM used in the glycosylation reactions was dried with flamed 4 Å molecular sieves before being used. Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis with detection by UV (254 nm) and where applicable by spraying with 20% sulfuric acid in EtOH or with a solution of (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O (25 g/L) and (NH4)4Ce(SO4)4·2H2O (10 g/L) in 10% sulfuric acid (aq.) followed by charring at ∼150 °C. Column chromatography was carried out using silica gel (0.040–0.063 mm). Size-exclusion chromatography was carried out using Sephadex LH-20. 1H and 13C spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV 400 and Bruker AV 500 in CDCl3 or D2O. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane as internal standard (1H NMR in CDCl3) or the residual signal of the deuterated solvent. Coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. All 13C spectra are proton decoupled. NMR peak assignments were made using COSY and HSQC experiments; where applicable, Clean TOCSY, HMBC and GATED experiments were used to further elucidate the structure. The anomeric product ratios were analyzed through integration of proton NMR signals.

Procedure A for the Glycosylation of Secondary Alcohols

A mixture of donor (1.0 equiv), acceptor (0.7 equiv) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (16 equiv) in dry DCM was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (1.0 equiv) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at 0 or −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The products were purified by size exclusion and silica gel column chromatography.

Procedure B for the Glycosylation of Primary Alcohols

A mixture of donor (1.0 equiv), acceptor (0.7 equiv) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), Ph3P=O (6 equiv) in dry DCM was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. Then, TMSI (1.0 equiv) was added slowly into the mixture. The reaction was stirred at room temperature until TLC analysis indicated the reaction to be complete. The solution was diluted, and the reaction was quenched with saturated Na2S2O3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The products were purified by size exclusion and silica gel column chromatography.

Procedure C for Deprotection of the PMB and Nap Protecting Group13

The starting material (1 equiv) was dissolved in DCM:HFIP (1:1, 0.1 M). TES (2.0 equiv) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (0.1–1 equiv) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (15 min to 2 h). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography.

Experimental Procedures and Characterization Data of Products

For the synthesis procedure and data of known compounds 9,15aS1,15aS2,15bS3,15c and S10(5e), see references. We used “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, “e”, “f”, “g”, “h”, and “i” to specify the 1H and 13C NMR signals of sugar rings from the “reducing” to the “non-reducing” end and “°” to specify the 1H and 13C NMR signals of the spacer.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0007.jpg

N-Phenyl Trifluoroacetimidate 2-N3-glucose Donor 1

Compound S1 (9.1 g, 15.2 mmol) was dissolved in acetone:H2O (10:1, 150 mL). N-Iodosuccinimide (NIS) (6.9 g, 30.5 mmol) was added in one portion, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3. Then, the organic layer was washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, and the product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:ethyl acetate (EA) = 3:1). The lactol (7.2 g, 14.3 mmol) was obtained as colorless syrup. Next, the lactol was dissolved in acetone (150 mL). Cs2CO3 (7.0 g, 21.3 mmol) and 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-phenylacetimidoyl chloride (3.4 mL, 21.3 mmol) were added to the solution, respectively. The reaction was stirred overnight, then quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 40:1–20:1). Compound 1 (8.5 g, 79% over two steps, pentane:EA = 10:1, Rf = 0.45–0.55) was obtained as yellow syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1029, 1082, 1119, 1210, 1251, 1312, 1514, 1720, 2112 (N3), 2872, 2912. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, 60 °C) δ 7.38–7.20 (m, aromatic H), 7.11–7.06 (m, aromatic H), 6.82–6.78 (m, aromatic H), 6.37 (bs, 1 H), 5.41 (bs, 1 H), 4.92–4.80 (m), 4.74–4.69 (m), 4.60–4.48 (m), 3.96 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.90 (bd, 1 H), 3.77–3.58 (m), 3.43 (t), 3.33 (bs, 1 H). 13 C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz, 60 °C) δ 159.8, 159.8, 143.6, 143.5, 138.3, 138.2, 138.1, 130.3 (aromatic C), 129.7, 128.9, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.1, 128.0, 1278.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.8, 124.7, 124.6, 119.6, 114.2, 114.2 (aromatic CH), 96.2 (C-1), 94.4 (C-1), 83.3, 80.5, 77.7, 77.3, 76.4, 75.7, 75.0, 74.8, 73.9, 73.8, 73.7, 68.5, 65.8, 63.5, 55.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for [M – [O(C=NPh)CF3] + OH + Na]+ C28H31O6N3Na: 582.21051, found: 582.20943.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0008.jpg

Synthesis of N-Phenyl Trifluoroacetimidate 2-N3-glucose Donor 2

Compound S2 (8.5 g, 15 mmol) was dissolved in acetone:H2O (10:1, 150 mL). NIS (6.7 g, 30 mmol) was added in one portion, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3. Then, the organic layer was washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, and the product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:ethyl acetate (EA) = 3:1). The lactol (6.1 g, 13 mmol) was obtained as colorless syrup. Next, the lactol was dissolved in acetone (150 mL). Cs2CO3 (6.4 g, 19.6 mmol) and 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-phenylacetimidoyl chloride (3.4 mL, 21.3 mmol) were added to the solution, respectively. The reaction was stirred overnight, then quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 40:1–20:1). Compound 2 (7.3 g, 87%) was obtained as yellow syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 694, 734, 1027, 1073, 1116, 1150, 1208, 1312, 1361, 1452, 1490, 1497, 1598, 1717, 2110 (N3), 2869, 3032. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, 60 °C) δ 7.52–6.81 (m, aromatic H), 6.37 (bs, 1 H, H-1α), 5.43 (bs, 1 H, H-1β), 4.89–4.76 (m, CHH), 4.60–4.48 (m, CHH), 3.98 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.91 (bd, 1 H), 3.80–3.59 (m), 3.46 (t), 3.36 (bs, 1 H). 13 C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz, 60 °C) δ 143.6, 143.5, 138.2, 138.2, 138.1, 138.1, 138.1 (aromatic C), 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 128.1, 128.0, 128.0, 127.97, 127.95, 127.91, 127.9, 126.5, 124.7, 124.6, 120.8, 119.6 (aromatic CH), 96.2 (C-1), 94.4 (C-1), 83.3, 80.5, 78.0, 77.6, 76.3, 75.7, 75.7, 75.4, 75.2, 73.9, 73.8, 73.7, 68.5, 65.8, 63.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for [M – [O(C=NPh)CF3] + OH + Na]+ C27H29O5N3Na: 498.19994, found: 498.19848.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0009.jpg

Synthesis of N-Phenyl Trifluoroacetimidate 2-N3-galactose Donor 3

Compound S3 (3.7 g, 6.0 mmol) was dissolved in acetone:H2O (10:1, 150 mL). NIS (2.7 g, 12 mmol) was added in one portion, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3. Then, the organic layer was washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, and the product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 3:1). The lactol was obtained as colorless syrup. Next, the lactol was dissolved in acetone. Cs2CO3 (3.0 g, 9 mmol) and 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-phenylacetimidoyl chloride (1.5 mL, 9 mmol) were added to the solution, respectively. The reaction was stirred overnight, then quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 40:1–20:1). Compound 3 (3.3 g, 86%) was obtained as yellow syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 695, 734, 751, 986, 1027, 1153, 1316, 1364, 1454, 1490, 1497, 1590, 1717, 2114 (N3), 2870, 2915. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.56–6.79 (m, aromatic H), 6.35 (bs, 1 H, H-1), 5.49 (bs, 1 H, H-1), 5.28 (d), 4.90–4.84 (m, CHH), 4.78–4.31 (m), 4.15–3.83 (m), 3.76 (dd), 3.65–3.31 (m). 13 C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 143.5, 143.4, 138.5, 138.3, 138.3, 138.2, 138.1, 137.7, 137.7, 137.6, 137.6, 137.4, 137.3, 135.2 (aromatic C), 129.5, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.43, 128.37, 128.3, 128.19, 128.17, 128.15, 128.14, 128.07, 128.03, 128.00, 127.95, 127.9, 126.48, 124.46, 120.6, 119.4 (aromatic CH), 96.5 (C-1), 92.5 (C-1), 80.9, 80.7, 77.4, 75.1, 74.9, 74.8, 74.7, 74.6, 73.8, 73.67, 73.65, 73.62, 73.5, 72.9, 72.7, 72.6, 72.5, 72.4, 72.3, 72.2, 71.9, 69.7, 69.3, 68.7, 68.3, 68.1, 64.7, 62.2, 60.4, 59.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calculated for C27H29O5N3Na: 669.22953, found: 669.22913.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0010.jpg

Synthesis of Monosaccharide 4

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure B. A mixture of donor 1 (1.0 g, 1.5 mmol), benzyl 6-hydroxyhexanoate (520 mg) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and Ph3P=O (2.6 g, 9.3 mmol) in dry DCM (15 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. Then, TMSI (222 μL, 1.5 mmol) was added slowly into the mixture. The reaction was stirred at room temperature until TLC analysis indicated the reaction to be complete. The solution was diluted, and the reaction was quenched with saturated Na2S2O3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The products were purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 8:1, Rf = 0.63). Compound S4 (800 mg, 75% yield, α:β = 5:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1002, 1029, 1037, 1075, 1150, 1248, 1358, 1454, 1611, 1733 (C=O), 2105 (N3), 2866, 2933. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.40–7.21 (m, 15 H, aromatic H), 7.00 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 6.79 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 5.09 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.90 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.88 (s, 2 H, PhCH2),4.71 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.63 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.49 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.43 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 3.975 (t, t, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, H-3a), 3.79–3.63 (m, 5 H, H-2a, H-4a, H-5a, H-6a, H-1°a), 3.47–3.37 (m, 1 H, H-1°b), 3.33 (dd, 1 H, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, H-2a), 2.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.70–1.58 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.43–1.36 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.4 (C=O), 159.4, 138.1, 137.9, 130.1 (aromatic C), 129.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.2, 127.99, 127.96, 127.9, 127.8, 113.9 (aromatic CH), 97.9 (C-1a), 80.2 (C-3a), 78.0 (C-4a), 75.3, 74.8, 73.6 (CH2), 70.7 (C-5a), 68.3 (C-6a), 68.0 (C-1°), 66.1 (PhCH2), 63.4 (C-2a), 55.3 (OCH3), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.1 (C-2°), 25.7 (C-3°), 24.7 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C41H51N4O8: 727.37014, found: 727.37015.

Then, the reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure C. The starting material S4 (700 mg, 0.99 m mol) was dissolved in DCM:HFIP (1:1, 0.1 M). TES (314 mL) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (0.5 mL) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (15 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 4:1, Rf = 0.34). Compound 4 (350 mg, 60% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +59.3 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1050, 1147, 1455, 1734 (C=O), 2105 (N3), 2866, 2926, 3478. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.41–7.23 (m, 15 H, aromatic H), 5.10 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.90 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.87 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.81 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.59 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.53 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 3.86–3.64 (m, 6 H, H-2a, H-3a, H-4a, H-5a, H-6a, H-1°a), 3.47–3.41 (m, 1 H, H-1°b), 3.25 (dd, 1 H, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, H-2a), 2.37 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.72–1.61 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.37 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.6 (C=O), 138.2, 137.9, 136.1 (aromatic C), 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.3, 128.1, 128.05, 127.9, 127.7, 127.5 (aromatic CH), 98.0 (C-1a), 79.8 (C-3a), 75.0 (C-6a), 73.7 (CH2), 72.2 (c-4a), 70.2 (c-5a), 69.8 (PhCH2), 68.1 (C-1°), 66.2 (PhCH2), 62.8 (C-2a), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.1 (C-2°), 25.7 (C-3°), 24.7 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C33H43O7N4: 607.31263, found: 607.31238.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0011.jpg

Synthesis of Acceptor 5

Donor 16 (620 mg, 1.0 mmol) and 2-azidoethanol (178 mg, 2.0 mmol) were dissolved in DCM and cooled to 0 °C, and TfOH (15 μL, 0.1 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the donor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Compound S5 (370 mg, 73%) was obtained with full α-selectivity. Then, compound S5 was dissolved in THF. HF-pyridine was added to the solution. After TLC analysis showed complete consumption of the starting material, the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with H2O and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, concentrated in vacuo. Crude compound S6, K2CO3, KI, and borinic acid-catalyzed were mixed in CH3CN, and then BnBr was added in the solution. The reaction was stirred at 60 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the starting material. The reaction was quenched with H2O after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 5:1). Compound 5 (280 mg, 84% yield over two steps) was obtained as colorless syrup. [α]D20 +89.9 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 698, 738, 1052, 1096, 1146, 1454, 2108 (N3), 2873, 2923, 3483. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.40–7.28 (m, 10 H, aromatic H), 4.95 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.71 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.68 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.60 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.57 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.12 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1 H, H-4a), 3.98 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H, H-5a), 3.93 (dd, 1 H, J1 = 10.5 Hz, J2 = 3.0 Hz, H-3a), 3.90–3.86 (m, 1 H, H-1°a), 3.77–3.63 (m, 4 H, H-2a, H-6a̲, H-1°b), 3.57–3.52 (m, 1 H, H-2°a), 3.37–3.33 (m, 1 H, H-2°b), 2.61 (bt, 1 H, OH), 1.21–1.18 (bt, 6 H, 2 CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 137.9, 137.3 (aromatic C), 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 127.8 (aromatic CH), 98.5 (C-1a), 76.0 (C-3a), 73.8, 72.1 (CH2), 69.6 (C-6a), 69.2 (C-5a), 67.2 (C-1°), 66.8 (C-4a), 59.0 (C-2a), 50.8 (C-2°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C22H30O5N7: 472.23029, found: 472.23003.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0012.jpg

Synthesis of Acceptor 6

Donor 1 (820 mg, 1.2 mmol), isopropanol (200 μL, 2.6 mmol), and Ph3P=O (2 g) were dissolved in DCM (12 mL), and TMSI (173 μL) was added at room temperature. The reaction was stirred at rt until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the donor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, purified by column chromatography. Compound S7 was obtained with α:β = 5:1. Then, compound S7 was dissolved in DCM/HFIP (1.5 mL: 1.5 mL). TES (380 μL) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (600 μL) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (30 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 5:1). Compound 6 (240 mg, 47% yield over two steps) was obtained as colorless syrup. [α]D20 +83.4 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 735, 1029, 1047, 1120, 1454, 2105 (N3), 2920, 2974, 3476. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.40–7.20 (m, 10 H, aromatic H), 4.97 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.88 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.78 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.57 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.50 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 3.93–3.82 (m, 3 H, H-3a, H-5a, H-1°), 3.73–3.61 (m, 3 H, H-4a, H-6a), 3.18 (dd, 1 H, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 3.6 Hz, H-2a), 2.76 (bs, 1 H, OH), 1.23, (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3 H, CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.2, 137.8 (aromatic C), 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6 (aromatic CH), 96.4 (C-1a), 79.6 (C-3a), 74.9, 73.6 (CH2), 72.1 (C-4a), 70.8 (C-1°), 70.1 (C-5a), 69.7 (C-6a), 62.5 (C-2a), 23.2 (CH3), 21.5 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C23H33O5N4: 445.24455, found: 445.24441.graphic file with name jo0c00703_0013.jpg

Synthesis of Acceptor 7

Donor 16 (2.77 g, 4.6 mmol) and isopropanol were dissolved in DCM (40 mL), cooled to 0 °C and TfOH (40 μL) was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the donor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Compound S8 was obtained with full α-selectivity. Then, compound S8 was dissolved in THF (20 mL). HF-pyridine (1 mL) was added to the solution. After TLC analysis showed complete consumption of the starting material, the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with H2O and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, concentrated in vacuo, purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 3:1). Compound S9 (1.45 g) was obtained with 94% yield over two steps. Then, compound S9 (665 mg, 1.97 mmol), K2CO3 (293 mg), KI (327 mg), and borinic acid-catalyzed (44 mg) were mixed in CH3CN (20 mL), and then BnBr was added in the solution. The reaction was stirred at 60 °C in oil bath until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the starting material. The reaction was quenched with H2O after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 5:1). Compound 7 (745 mg, 80% yield) was obtained as colorless syrup. [α]D20 +102.7 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 698, 737, 1052, 1454, 2108 (N3), 2892, 2926. 2972. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.42–7.27 (m, 10 H, aromatic H), 5.02 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.71 (bs, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.58 (bs, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.15 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H, H-4a), 4.01 (bt, 1 H, H-5a), 3.95–3.89 (m, 2 H, H-3a, H-1°), 3.76 (dd, 1 H, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 6.0 Hz, H-6aa), 3.70–3.62 (m, 2 H, H-6ab, H-2a), 2.60 (bs, 1 H, OH), 1.23 (d, 3 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH3), 1.21 (d, 3 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.0, 137.5 (aromatic C), 128.8, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8 (aromatic CH), 96.7 (C-1a), 76.1 (C-3a), 73.8, 72.0 (CH2), 70.9 (C-1°), 69.6 (C-6a), 68.7 (C-5a), 66.8 (C-4a), 59.0 (C-2a), 23.3 (CH3), 21.6 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C23H33O5N4: 445.24455, found: 445.24455.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 8

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 1 (320 mg, 0.47 mmol), acceptor 4 (185 mg, 0.31 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (610 μL) in dry DCM (3 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (42 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 8 (304 mg, 88% yield, α:β = 15:1, PE:EA = 4:1, Rf = 0.51) was obtained as a colorless syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1027, 1147, 1249, 1358, 1454, 1514, 1734 (C=O), 2103 (N3), 2866, 2928. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.39–7.21 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 7.00 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 6.79 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 5.66 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.11 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.98(d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.93 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.89–4.82 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.66 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.54–4.47 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.37 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.23 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.07 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1 H, H-3a), 3.98 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1 H, H-4a), 3.87–3.61 (m, 10 H, H-3b, H-4b, H-5a, H-5b, H-6a, H-6ba, OCH3), 3.54–3.44 (m, 2 H, H-6bb, H-1°a), 3.35–3.29 (m, 3 H, H-2a, H-2b, H-1°b), 2.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.73–1.63 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.46–1.38 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 159.4, 138.2, 138.0, 137.84, 137.82, 136.2, 130.2 (aromatic C), 129.7, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.84, 127.78, 127.6, 127.4, 113.9 (aromatic CH), 97.8 (C-1b), 97.7 (C-1a), 80.9 (C-3a), 80.3 (C-3b), 77.8 (C-4b), 75.5, 74.7, 74.5, 73.6, 73.5 (PhCH2), 73.4 (c-4a), 71.6 (c-5b), 70.2 (C-5a), 69.1 (C-6a), 68.2 (C-6b), 67.9 (C-1°), 66.2 (PhCH2), 63.8 (C-2), 63.4 (C-2), 55.4 (OCH3), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C61H72N7O12: 1094.52335, found: 1094.52388.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 9

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 2 (146 mg, 0.22 mmol), acceptor 5 (50 mg, 0.11 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (216 μL) in dry DCM was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (19 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 9 (86 mg, 87%, α:β = 10:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1027, 1046, 1093, 1127, 1150, 1259, 1359, 1454, 2105 (N3), 2869, 2923. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.40–7.05 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 4.99 (bt, 2 H, H-1a and H-1b), 4.90–4.76 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.69 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.63 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.59–4.53 (m, 2 H, 2 CHH), 4.39 (bt, 2 H, 2 CHH), 4.31 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.13–3.49 (m, 13 H), 3.39–3.29 (m, 2 H), 3.22 (dd, J1 = 12.4 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.96 (dd, J1 = 10.8 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.48 (d, J1 = 10.8 Hz, J2 = 1.6 Hz, 1 H). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.1, 137.8, 137.7, 137.5 (aromatic C), 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.4, 128.2, 128.07, 128.06, 127.9, 127.82, 127.78, 127.75, 127.7, 127.2 (aromatic CH), 98.9 (C-1), 98.5 (C-1), 80.2, 78.1, 75.6, 75.4, 74.9, 73.7, 73.3, 73.3, 72.0, 70.9, 69.6, 67.3, 67.3, 67.0, 64.0, 59.4, 50.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+: Calculated for C49H57O9N10: 929.43045, found: 929.43039.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 10

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 3 (77 mg, 0.12 mmol), acceptor 6 (34 mg, 0.08 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (156 μL) in dry DCM was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (8 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 10 (56 mg, 88% yield, α:β = 8:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1050, 1097, 1122, 1258, 1454, 2108 (N3), 2869, 2928. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.41–7.19 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 5.64 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 5.03 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 4.96 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.91 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.81 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.67 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.61 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.56 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.48 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.44 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.29 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.22 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.07 (dd, J = 8.0, 10.0 Hz, 1 H, H-3b), 3.98–3.78 (m, 7 H), 3.72–3.63 (m, 2 H, H-6), 3.48–3.37 (m, 2 H, H-6), 3.29 (dd, J = 3.6, 10.0 Hz, 1H, H-2b), 1.28 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H, CH3), 1.24 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1 H, CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.4, 138.2, 137.9, 137.6 (aromatic C), 128.62, 128.57, 128.5, 128.42, 128.37, 128.3, 128.0, 127.92, 127.89, 127.85, 127.8, 127.5, 127.4 (aromatic CH), 98.0 (C-1a), 96.2 (C-1b), 80.8 (C-3b), 77.6 (C-3a), 74.9, 74.5 (PhCH2), 74.0 (C-2a), 73.6, 73.2 (PhCH2), 72.9 (C-4b), 72.2 (PhCH2), 71.1 (C-4a), 70.2 (C-5b), 70.1 (C-5a), 69.5 (C-6), 68.5 (C-6), 63.6 (C-2b), 59.8 (C-1°), 23.4 (CH3), 21.7 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C50H60O9N7: 902.44470, found: 902.44467.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 11

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 3 (77 mg, 0.12 mmol), acceptor 7 (34 mg, 0.08 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (156 μL) in dry DCM was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (8 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 11 (62 mg, 80% yield, α:β = 4:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +85.8 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 986, 1037, 1117, 1209, 1261, 1454, 2106 (N3), 2870, 2925. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.43–7.12 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 5.05 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.98 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 4.88 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.80 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.72 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.63 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.54 (bd, 3 H,3 CHH), 4.47 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.36 (dd, J = 5.2, 9.2 Hz, 1 H, H-5a), 4.28 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H, H-4a), 4.10 (s, 1 H, H-4b), 4.03–3.85 (m, 8 H, H-6ba, H-5b, H-3b, H-3a, H-2b, H-2a, H-1°), 3.60 (dd, J = 3.6, 11.2 Hz, 1H, H-2a), 3.56–3.49 (m, 2 H, H-6bb, H-6aa), 3.14–3.09 (m, 2 H, H-6ab), 1.20 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H, CH3), 1.19 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H, CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.7, 138.0, 137.7, 137.6 (aromatic C), 128.64, 128.58, 128.55, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.12, 128.09, 128.0, 127.90, 127.87, 127.75, 127.74, 127.6, 127.3 (aromatic CH), 98.2 (C-1b), 96.8 (C-1a), 77.4 (C-3b), 75.9 (C-3a), 75.0, 73.7, 73.2 (PhCH2), 73.0 (C-4b), 72.9 (C-4a), 71.9, 71.9 (PhCH2), 71.0 (C-1°), 69.4 (C-5b), 69.2 (C-5a), 67.7 (C-6a), 67.2 (C-6b), 60.4 (C-2b), 59.5 (C-2a), 23.4 (CH3), 21.7 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C50H60O9N7: 902.44470, found: 902.44482.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 12

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure C. Compound 8 (200 mg, 0.18 mmol) was dissolved in DCM:HFIP (1:1, 0.1 M). TES (60 μL) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (100 μL) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (30 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 5:1, Rf = 0.22). Compound 12 (152 mg, 88% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +62.9 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1029, 1043, 1146, 1261, 1454, 1734 (C=O), 2105 (N3), 2868, 2926, 3491. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.42–7.20 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 5.64 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.11 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.98 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.93 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.89–4.82 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.51 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.08 (dd, J1 = 8.8 Hz, J2 = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, H-3a), 3.99 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H, H-4a), 3.86–3.65 (m, 7 H, H-3b, H-4b, H-5a, H-5b, H-6b, H-6aa), 3.53–3.44 (m, 2 H, H-6ab, H-1°a), 3.40–3.33 (m, 2 H, H-2a, H-1°b), 3.24 (dd, J1 = 3.6 Hz, J2 = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, H-2b), 2.68 (bs, 1 H, OH), 2.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.73–1.64 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.39 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.56 (C=O), 138.23, 138.17, 137.8, 137.7, 136.2 (aromatic C), 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.83, 127.79, 127.6, 127.4 (aromatic CH), 97.7 (C-1a), 97.6 (C-1b), 80.9 (C-3a), 79.7 (C-3b), 75.2, 74.5, 73.7, 73.4 (PhCH2), 73.1 (C-4b), 72.8 (c-4a), 70.6 (c-5b), 70.2 (C-5a), 69.9 (C-6a), 69.0 (C-6b), 68.2 (C-1°), 66.3 (PhCH2), 63.8 (C-2a), 62.8 (C-2b), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C53H64N7O11: 974.46583, found: 974.46576.

Synthesis of Trisaccharide 13

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 1 (160 mg, 0.24 mmol), acceptor 12 (150 mg, 0.16 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (307 mL) in dry DCM (1.5 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (300 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 13 (186 mg, 81% yield, α:β > 19:1, PE:EA = 4:1, Rf = 0.40) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +75.8 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1029, 1147, 1249, 1359, 1454, 1514, 1734 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2866, 2932. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.39–7.21 (m, 35 H, aromatic H), 7.00 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 6.79 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 5.69 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.67 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.11 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 5.02–4.82 (m, 7 H, 6 CHH, H-1a), 4.66 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.56–4.46 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.39–4.33 (m, 2 H, 2 CHH), 4.26 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.18 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.14–3.98 (m, 4 H), 3.90–3.59 (m, 11 H), 3.56–3.44 (m, 3 H), 3.37–3.24 (m, 3 H), 2.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.73–1.63 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.39 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 159.4, 138.3, 138.2, 138.0, 137.8, 137.7, 137.6, 136.1, 130.3 (aromatic C), 129.6, 128.6, 128.57, 128.55, 128.4, 128.3, 128.26, 128.1, 127.9, 127.86, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 113.8 (aromatic CH), 97.8, 97.7, 97.4 (C-1a, 1b and 1c), 81.0, 80.7, 79.9 (C-3a, 3b and 3c), 77.7 (C-4c), 75.3, 74.7, 74.6, 74.2, 73.6, 73.5 (PhCH2), 73.0, 72.5 (C-4a and 4b), 71.5, 71.1, 70.2 (c-5a, 5b and 5c), 68.9, 68.7 (2 C-6), 68.2 (C-1°), 67.7 (C-6), 66.2 (PhCH2), 63.9, 63.6, 63.1 (C-2a, 2b and 2c), 55.3 (OCH3), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.1 (C-2°), 25.7 (C-3°), 24.7 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C81H93N10O16: 1461.67655, found: 1461.67594.

Synthesis of Trisaccharide Acceptor 14

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure C. The starting material 13 (320 mg, 0.22 mmol) was dissolved in DCM:HFIP (1:1, 0.1 M). TES (71 μL) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (110 μL) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (15 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 4:1). Compound 14 (230 mg, 78% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +51.0 (c = 3 mg/mL, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1028, 1148, 1454, 1736 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2866, 2926. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.42–7.17 (m, 35 H, aromatic H), 5.67–5.65 (m, 2 H, H-1b and H-1c), 5.12 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 5.01–4.85 (m, 7 H, 6 CHH, H-1a), 4.56 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.50 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.37–4.32 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.22 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.14–3.99 (m, 4 H), 3.87–3.62 (m, 8 H), 3.56–3.43 (m, 3 H), 3.37–3.30 (m, 4 H), 3.18 (dd, J1 = 3.6 Hz, J2 = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, H-2c), 2.76 (bs, 1 H, OH), 2.39 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.74–1.64 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.41 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.6 (C=O), 138.3, 138.20, 138.17, 137.8, 137.6, 137.5, 136.2 (aromatic C), 138.7, 128.7, 128.6, 128.55, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.13, 128.09, 128.0, 127.95, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.5, 127.48, 127.3 (aromatic CH), 97.8, 97.7, 97.4 (C-1a, 1b and 1c), 81.1, 80.8, 79.1 (C-3a, 3b and 3c), 75.0, 74.6, 74.3, 73.7, 73.5, 73.4 (PhCH2), 73.0, 72.9, 72.3 (C-4a, 4b and 4c), 71.1, 70.3, 70.2 (c-5a, 5b and 5c), 70.0, 68.9, 68.6 (C-6a, 6b and 6c), 68.3 (C-1°), 66.26 (PhCH2), 63.9, 63.7, 62.5 (C-2a, 2b and 2c), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C73H85N10O15: 1341.61904, found: 1341.61923.

Synthesis of Tetrasaccharide 15

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 1 (40 mg, 0.06 mmol), acceptor 14 (35 mg, 0.03 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (52 μL) in dry DCM (0.3 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (5 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 15 (43 mg, 87% yield, α:β > 20:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +94.8 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1029, 1148, 1251, 1359, 1454, 1514, 1735 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2868, 2928. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.42–7.15 (m, 45 H, aromatic H), 7.00 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 6.79 (bd, 2 H, aromatic H), 5.70–5.67 (m, 3 H, H-1b, 1c, 1d), 5.11 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 5.02–4.87 (m, 8 H, 7 CHH, H-1a), 4.81 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.66 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.54 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.65 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.38–4.28 (m, 4 H, 4 CHH), 4.22–4.00 (m, 8 H), 3.90–3.59 (m, 15 H), 3.52–3.44 (m, 3 H), 3.39–3.34 (m, 7 H), 2.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.73–1.64 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.38 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 159.4, 138.3, 138.2, 138.0, 137.84, 137.78, 137.6, 136.2, 130.3 (aromatic C), 129.7, 128.7, 128.65, 128.61, 128.59, 128.48, 128.45, 128.4, 128.33, 128.30, 128.2, 128.02, 127.98, 127.93, 127.87, 127.8, 127.74, 127.71, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 113.9 (aromatic CH), 97.9, 97.8, 97.5, 97.48 (C-1a, 1b, 1c and 1d), 81.0, 80.9, 80.8, 80.0 (C-3a, 3b, 3c and 3d), 77.8 (C-4), 75.3, 74.7, 74.4, 74.3, 73.6, 73.6, 73.54, 73.51 (PhCH2), 73.1 (C-4), 72.4 (C-4), 72.1 (C-4), 71.5, 71.2, 71.1, 70.2 (c-5a, 5b, 5c and 5d), 68.9, 68.6, 68.3 (3 C-6), 68.29 (C-1°), 67.8 (C-6), 66.3 (PhCH2), 63.8, 63.7, 63.6, 63.2 (C-2a, 2b, 2c and 2d), 55.4 (OCH3), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°).graphic file with name jo0c00703_0014.jpg

Synthesis of N-Phenyl Trifluoroacetimidate 2-N3-galactose Donor 16

NIS (9.15 g, 40.68 mmol) was added to the solution of compound S3 (18 g, 31.3 mmol) in Acetone/H2O (210 mL/72 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction was slowly warmed to room temperature and stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (±1h). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM and washed with saturated Na2S2O3 and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The lactol was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:EA = 4:1). Cs2CO3 was added to the solution of The lactol (10.59g, 24.33 mmol) in 140 mL acetone. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. Then, CF3C(=NPh)Cl (6.06 g, 29.2 mmol) was added to the solution. which was slowly warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with Et3N and concentrated in vacuo. The product 16 was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 30:1–10:1). Compound 16 (13.3 g, a/b = 2:1, 90% yield, PE: Et2O = 10:1, Rf = 0.45–0.55) was obtained as white solid. α isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.50–7.24 (m, 7H, aromatic H), 7.15–7.05 (m, 1H, aromatic H), 6.84 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 6.47 (bs, 1H, H-1), 4.78 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 4.69 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 4.63 (s, 1H, H-4), 4.22 (q, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H. H-6), 4.10 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.89 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, H-3), 3.76 (s, 1H, H-5), 1.09–1.02 (m, 18H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.29, 137.45, 128.74, 128.56, 128.01, 127.91, 124.40, 119.35 (aromatic C/CH), 94.73 (C-1), 76.04 (C-3), 70.71 (CH2Ph), 69.89 (C-5), 69.16 (C-4), 66.76 (C-6), 57.71 (C-2), 27.59 (CH3), 27.23 (CH3), 23.38 (C-Si), 20.73 (C-Si). β isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.48–7.25 (m, 7H, aromatic H), 7.14–7.04 (m, 1H, aromatic H), 6.85 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 5.50 (bs, 1H, H-1), 4.77 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 4.66 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 4.43 (s, 1H, H-5), 4.19 (s, 2H, H-6), 4.02 (s, 1H, H-4), 3.30 (s, 2H, H-2, 3), 1.15–1.00 (m, 18H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.5, 137.5, 128.8, 128.7, 128.2, 128.0, 124.5, 119.4 (aromatic C/CH), 95.8 (C-1), 79.6 (C-3), 72.2 (C-2), 71.0 (CH2Ph), 68.6 (C-5), 66.8 (C-6), 60.8 (C-4), 27.7 (CH3), 27.4 (CH3), 23.6 (C-Si), 20.9 (C-Si). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C21H37N3O5Si: 629.2383, found: 629.2376.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 18

Donor 16 (5 g, 8.2 mmol) and acceptor 17 (3.32 g, 6.95 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times) were dissolved in DCM (65 mL) and cooled to 0 °C, and TfOH (60 μL) was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the donor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product 16 was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 10:1). Compound 18 (4.36g, 70% yield) was obtained with full α-selectivity as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +153.3 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 651, 698, 738, 797, 826, 984, 1043, 1066, 1100, 1171, 1364, 1473, 2107 (N3), 2859, 2933. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.53–7.51 (m, 2 H, aromatic H), 7.44–7.22 (m, 18 H, aromatic H), 5.64 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.59 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 5.00 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.91 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.73 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.63 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.43–4.37 (m, 4 H, 2 CHH, H-4b, H-5a), 3.96–3.77 (m, 6 H, H-2a, H-2b, H-3a, H-4a, H-6), 3.72–3.64 (m, 2 H, H-3b, H-6a), 3.53 (dd, J1 = 2.0 Hz, J2 = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, H-6b), 3.42 (s, 1 H, H-5b), 1.03 (s, 9 H, 3 CH3), 0.97 (s, 9 H, 3 CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 137.9, 137.8, 137.4, 133.5 (aromatic C), 132.1, 129.2, 128.62, 128.58, 128.51, 128.48, 128.00. 127.98, 127.8, 127.5 (aromatic CH), 97.7 (C-1b), 87.1 (C-1a), 82.3 (C-3a), 75.5 (C-3b), 75.0, 73.3 (PhCH2), 72.8 (c-4a), 71.3 (c-5a), 70.5 (PhCH2), 69.6 (C-4b), 68.9 (C-6), 68.0 (C-5b), 66.9 (C-6), 64.6 (C-2a), 58.1 (C-2b), 27.7 (3 CH3), 27.3 (3 CH3), 23.4, 20.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C47H62N7O8SSi: 912.41444, found: 912.41409.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 20

Compound 18 (4.1 g, 4.6 mmol) was dissoveld in THF (40 mL) in a round flusk. Then, HF-pyridine (1.2 mL) was added in the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (30 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude compound 19 was dissolved in CH3CN (47 mL). Then, BnBr (880 μL), borinic acid-catalyzed (110 mg), K2CO3 (710 mg), KI (800 mg) were added into the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C in oil bath until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (24 h). Then, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and the reaction quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 5:1). Compound 20 (3.6 g, 94% yield with two steps) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +11.7 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1029, 1046, 1077, 1266, 2106 (N3), 2870, 2919, 3493. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.54–7.51 (m, 2 H, aromatic H), 7.41–7.23 (m, 23 H, aromatic H), 5.61 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.60 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 5.00 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.94 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.66 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.50–4.37 (m, 3 H, 2 CHH, 5a), 4.08 (s, 1 H, H-4b), 3.97–3.91 (m, 2 H, H-2b, H-4a), 3.85–3.37 (m, 5 H), 3.66 (dd, J1 = 2.4 Hz, J2 = 10.8 Hz, 1 H, H-6b), 3.59 (dd, J1 = 5.6 Hz, J2 = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.51 (dd, J1 = 5.6 Hz, J2 = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.63 (s, 1 H, OH). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.3, 137.8, 137.6, 137.2, 133.5 (aromatic C), 132.3, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 128.o, 127.9, 127.86, 127.85, 127.6, 127.55 (aromatic CH), 98.2 (C-1b), 87.1 (C-1a), 82.1 (C-3a), 76.3 (C-3b), 75.1 (PhCH2), 74.4 (c-4a), 73.8, 73.2, 71.8 (PhCH2), 71.3 (c-5a), 69.5 (C-6), 69.4 (C-6), 69.3 (C-5b), 66.5 (C-4b), 64.8 (C-2b), 59.0 (C-2a). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C46H52N7O8S: 862.35926, found: 862.35895.

Synthesis of Thio-disaccharide 21

The compound 20 (3.83 g, 4.53 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL). Then, NaH (544 mg) and NapBr (1.5 g) were added into the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (2 h). Then, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and the reaction quenched with ice water. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 10:1). Compound 21 (4.15 g, 93% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +208.6 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 737, 1028, 1049, 1093, 1123, 1362, 1454, 2106 (N3), 2870. 2914. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.80–7.11 (m, 32 H, aromatic H), 5.64 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.59 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 5.01–4.89 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.70–4.62 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.50 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.44–4.40 (m, 2 H, CHH, 5b), 4.27 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.17 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.04 (s, 1 H, H-4b), 3.97–3.81 (m, 6 H, H-2a, H-2b, H-3a, H-3b, H-4a, H-5a), 3.77–3.65 (m, 2 H, H-6), 3.51–3.40 (m, 2 H, H-6). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.3, 137.8, 137.60, 137.58, 135.6, 133.6, 133.2, 133.1 (aromatic C), 133.08, 129.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.99, 127.97, 127.93, 127.80, 127.6, 127.4, 127.2, 126.5, 126.2, 126.1 (aromatic CH), 98.3 (C-1b), 87.1 (C-1a), 82.2 (C-3a), 77.5 (C-3b), 75.2, 74.9 (PhCH2), 74.1 (c-4a), 73.6, 73.1 (PhCH2), 72.8 (C-4b), 72.3 (PhCH2), 71.3 (C-5b), 70.4 (C-5a), 69.4 (C-6), 68.6 (C-6), 64.8 (C-2a), 69.8 (C-2b). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C57H60N7O8S: 1002.42186, found: 1002.42125.

N-Phenyl Trifluoroacetimidate Disaccharide Donor 23

Compound 21 (4.15 g, 4.21 mmol) was dissolved in acetone:H2O (10:1, 44 mL). NIS (2.0 g, 8.8 mmol) was added in one portion, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3. Then, the organic layer was washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo, and the product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 3:1). The lactol 22 was obtained as colorless syrup. Next, the lactol was dissolved in acetone (40 mL). Cs2CO3 (1.9 g) and 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-phenylacetimidoyl chloride (960 μL) were added to the solution, respectively. The reaction was stirred overnight, then quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (pentane:EA = 40:1–20:1). Compound 23 (3.7 g, 81% over two steps) was obtained as yellow syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 695, 734, 818, 1027, 1116, 1209, 1312, 1454, 1489, 1497, 1717, 2107, 2870, 2918. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.80–7.09 (m, aromatic H), 6.81 (bt, 1 H), 5.65 (dd, 1 H), 5.01–4.87 (m), 4.68–4.54 (m), 4.45–4.42 (m), 4.33–4.18 (m), 4.03–3.41 (m). 13 C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 143.4, 143.2, 138.20, 138.18, 137.8, 137.6, 137.55, 137.5, 135.6, 133.3, 133.2 (aromatic C), 128.9, 128.7, 128.53, 128.52, 128.44, 128.43, 128.3, 128.08, 128.05, 128.0, 127.97, 127.9, 127.84, 127.81, 127.69, 127.66, 127.65, 127.6, 127.2, 127.17, 124.7, 124.6 (aromatic CH), 119.4 (C-1), 98.3 (C-1), 98.2 (C-1), 83.6, 81.0, 77.6, 77.3, 75.5, 75.18, 75.16, 75.0, 74.9, 73.64, 73.60, 73.30, 73.2, 73.1, 73.0, 72.8, 72.7, 72.3, 72.2, 70.4, 70.3, 69.0, 68.5, 65.8, 63.7, 59.7, 59.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M – [O(C=NPh)CF3] + OH + Na]+ Calculated for C59H56F3N7O9Na: 910.41340, found: 910.41374.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 24

Donor 16 (1.09 g) and acceptor 4 (790 mg) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times) were dissolved in DCM (12 mL) and cooled to 0 °C, and TfOH (12 μL) was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the donor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N after completion, checked by TLC, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 24 (1.24 g, 92% yield) was obtained with full α-selectivity as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +95.9 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 651, 698, 737, 765, 797, 826, 984, 1004, 1040, 1130, 1144, 1171, 1455, 1474, 1735 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2860, 2933. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.44–7.24 (m, 20 H, aromatic H), 5.67 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.12 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.96 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.92 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.86 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.71 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.61 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.48 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 4.36 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H, H-4b), 4.06 (dd, J1 = 10 Hz, J2 = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, H-3a), 3.91–3.78 (m, 4 H), 3.74–3.45 (m, 6 H), 3.34–3.30 (m, 2 H, H-2a, H-1°b), 2.39 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.74–1.64 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.48–1.42 (m, 2 H, H-3°), 1.03 (s, 9 H, 3 CH3), 0.95 (s, 9 H, 3 CH3). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 138.0, 137.9, 137.7, 136.2 (aromatic C), 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.0, 127.96, 127.9, 127.86, 127.6 (aromatic CH), 97.9 (C-1b), 97.5 (C-1a), 81.0 (C-3a), 75.5 (C-3b), 74.3, 73.5 (PhCH2), 72.4 (c-4a), 70.5 (PhCH2), 70.1 (c-5a), 69.6 (C-4b), 69.1 (C-6), 68.3 (C-1°), 67.9 (C-5b), 66.9 (C-6), 66.3 (PhCH2), 63.6 (C-2a), 58.1 (C-2b), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 27.7 (3 CH3), 27.3 (3 CH3), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°), 23.4, 20.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C54H74N7O11Si: 1024.52101, found: 1024.52157.

Synthesis of Disaccharide 25

Compound 24 (1.16 g, 1.15 mmol) was dissoveld in THF (11 mL) in a round flusk. Then, HF-pyridine (300 μL) was added in the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (30 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 3:1). Compound 25 (910 mg, 91% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +80.6 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 698, 738, 1040, 1145, 1262, 1354, 1455, 1733 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2872, 2932, 3461. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.38–7.25 (m, 20 H, aromatic H), 5.65 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.12 (s, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.97 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.92 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.88 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.67–4.54 (m, 4 H, 4 CHH), 4.05 (dd, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, H-3a), 3.91–3.80 (m, 2 H, H-4a, H-5), 3.74–3.57 (m, 8 H), 3.51–3.44 (m, 1 H, H-1°b), 3.31 (dd, J1 = 10.0 Hz, J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-2a), 2.65 (s, 1 H, OH), 2.39 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 2.29 (s, 1 H, OH), 1.74–1.64 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.40 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.60 (C=O), 138.1, 137.80, 137.1, 136.1 (aromatic C), 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.31, 128.29, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7 (aromatic CH), 97.9 (C-1b), 97.7 (C-1a), 80.8 (C-3a), 76.1 (C-3b), 74.5 (PhCH2), 73.8 (c-4a), 73.7 (PhCH2), 71.9 (PhCH2), 70.3 (c-5b), 70.2 (C-5a), 69.7 (C-6), 68.3 (C-1°), 67.2 (C-4b), 66.3 (PhCH2), 63.8 (C-2a), 62.9 (C-6), 58.8 (C-2b), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C46H60N7O11: 884.41888, found: 884.41942.

Synthesis of Disaccharide Acceptor 26

The compound 25 (865 mg, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in CH3CN (10 mL). Then, BnBr (182 μL), borinic acid catalyst (22 mg), K2CO3 (148 mg), and KI (166 mg) were added into the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C in oil bath until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (24 h). Then, the mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 5:1). Compound 26 (910 mg, 95%) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +66.6 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1040, 1096, 1259, 1455, 1734 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2869, 2928. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.40–7.21 (m, 25 H, aromatic H), 5.64 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.11 (s, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.96 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.91 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1a), 4.88 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.63 (bs, 2 H, 2 CHH), 4.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.45 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.47–4.36 (m, 3 H, 3 CHH), 4.07–4.03 (m, 2 H, H-3a, H-5a), 3.91–3.44 (m, 12 H), 3.32 (dd, J1 = 11.2 Hz, J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-2a), 2.65 (s, 1 H, OH), 2.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.73–1.63 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.47–1.39 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 138.3, 137.8, 137.3, 136.1 (aromatic C), 129.1, 128.7, 128.65, 128.54, 128.50, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.6, 127.6, 127.3 (aromatic CH), 97.9 (C-1b), 97.7 (C-1a), 80.8 (C-3a), 76.3 (C-3b), 74.5 (PhCH2), 73.9 (C-4a), 73.8, 73.3, 71.7 (PhCH2), 70.1 (C-4b), 69.5, 69.4 (C-6), 69.2 (C-5b), 68.2 (C-1°), 66.4 (C-5a), 66.2 (PhCH2), 63.7 (C-2a), 58.9 (C-2b), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.1 (C-2°), 25.7 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C53H64N7O11: 974.46583, found: 974.46660.

Synthesis of Tetrasaccharide 27

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 23 (520 mg, 0.49 mmol), acceptor 26 (238 mg, 0.25 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (490 μL) in dry DCM (1 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (40 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor. The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 27 (280 mg, 89%, α:β = 10:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1028, 1096, 1258, 1319, 1356, 1454, 1497, 1731 (C=O), 2105 (N3), 2868, 2925. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.77–7.69 (m, 3 H, aromatic H), 7.60 (bs, 1 H, aromatic H), 7.42–7.17 (m, 48 H, aromatic H), 5.73 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1d), 5.65 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.10 (s, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.96–4.90 (m, 7 H), 4.74–4.48 (m, 7 H), 4.36–3.61 (m, 22 H), 3.51–3.26 (m, 6 H), 3.20 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.03 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.71–1.61 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.45–1.37 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.4 (C=O), 138.4, 138.2, 137.7, 137.68, 137.6, 137.54, 137.47, 136.1, 135.6, 133.1, 133.0 (aromatic C), 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.38, 128.35, 128.27, 128.25, 128.2, 128.1, 128.07, 128.0, 127.9, 127.88, 127.86, 127.78, 127.76, 127.66, 127.6, 127.4, 127.3, 127.1, 127.0, 126.4, 126.0, 125.9 (aromatic CH), 98.7 (C-1), 98.1 (C-1), 97.8 (C-1), 97.7 (C-1), 81.0 (C-3), 80.7 (C-3), 76.8 (C-3), 75.1 (C-3), 74.9, 74.5, 74.4 (CH2), 73.5 (C-4), 73.5, 73.3 (CH2), 73.2 (C-4), 72.9 (C-4), 72.8 (C-4), 72.8, 72.2, 71.7 (CH2), 70.6 (C-5), 70.1 (C-5), 69.9 (C-5), 69.8 (C-5), 69.2, 68.4, 68.1, 67.9, 66.8, 66.1 (CH2), 64.7 (C-2), 63.7 (C-2), 59.5 (C-2), 59.4 (C-2), 34.1 (C-5°), 29.0 (C-2°), 25.6 (C-3°), 24.7 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C104H114N13O19: 1848.83484, found: 1848.83541.

Synthesis of Tetrasaccharide Acceptor 28

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure C. Compound 27 (700 mg, 0.38 mmol) was dissolved in DCM:HFIP (1:1, 0.1 M). TES (304 μL, 1.91 mmol) and 0.2 M HCl/HFIP (1.9 mL) were added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred until TLC analysis indicated full consumption of the starting material (15 min). Then, the mixture was diluted with DCM, and the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane:Et2O = 5:1). Compound 28 (297 mg, 73% yield) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +106.7 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 696, 737, 1040, 1100, 1261, 1454, 1735 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2869, 2926. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.42–7.17 (m, 45 H, aromatic H), 5.71 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, H-1d), 5.65 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, H-1b), 5.10 (s, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.95–4.89 (m, 6 H, H-1a, H-1c, 4 CHH), 4.72 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1 H, CHH), 4.68 (s, 2 H, 2 CHH), 4.57–4.48 (m, 3 H), 4.36–4.17 (m, 7 H), 4.09–3.58 (m, 17 H), 3.51–3.30 (m, 3 H), 3.36–3.30 (m, 3 H), 3.91–3.44 (m, 12 H), 3.17 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.02 (dd, J1 = 11.5 Hz, J2 = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.66 (s, 1 H, OH), 2.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.71–1.63 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.45–1.39 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 173.5 (C=O), 138.5, 138.3, 137.8, 137.7, 137.68, 137.6, 137.4, 136.2 (aromatic C), 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 128.18, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.86, 127.8, 127.7, 127.69, 127.5, 127.5, 127.3, 127.2 (aromatic CH), 98.8 (C-1), 98.1 (C-1), 97.9 (C-1), 97.8 (C-1), 80.9 (C-3), 80.8 (C-3), 76.1 (C-3), 75.8 (C-3), 74.54, 74.46, 73.7 (CH2), 73.6 (C-4), 73.56, 73.4 (CH2), 73.1 (2 C-4), 73.07 71.8, 71.75 (CH2), 70.7 (C-4), 70.2 (C-5), 69.9 (C-5), 69.3, 69.1 (CH2), 68.8 (C-5), 68.5, 68.3, 68.9 (CH2), 66.5 (C-5), 66.3 (PhCH2), 64.7 (C-2), 63.8 (C-2), 59.6 (C-2), 58.8 (C-2), 34.3 (C-5°), 29.2 (C-2°), 25.8 (C-3°), 24.8 (C-4°). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + NH4]+ Calculated for C93H106N13O19: 1708.77224, found: 1708.77299.

Synthesis of Hexasaccharide 29

The reaction was carried out according to the standard procedure A. A mixture of donor 23 (540 mg, 0.5 mmol), acceptor 28 (360 mg, 0.21 mmol) (donors and acceptors coevaporated with toluene three times), and MPF (400 μL) in dry DCM (1 mL) was stirred over fresh flame-dried 3 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, after which TfOH (44 μL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stirred at −10 °C until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the acceptor (48 h). The reaction was quenched with Et3N, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by size exclusion (DCM:MeOH = 1:1). Compound 29 (500 mg, 91%, α:β = 10:1) was obtained as a colorless syrup. [α]D20 +123.0 (c = 1, CHCl3). IR (neat, cm–1) ν 697, 736, 1039, 1099, 1261, 1319, 1359, 1454, 1734 (C=O), 2106 (N3), 2870, 2926. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.77–7.69 (m, 3 H, aromatic H), 7.60 (bs, 1 H, aromatic H), 7.44–7.07 (m, 68 H, aromatic H), 5.73 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.71 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.65 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.09 (s, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.96–4.91 (m, 9 H), 4.77–4.65 (m, 5 H), 4.58–4.48 (m, 4 H), 4.33–3.62 (m, 37 H), 3.52–3.16 (m, 10 H), 3.05 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.99 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, H-5°), 1.71–1.61 (m, 4 H, H-2°, H-4°), 1.45–1.37 (m, 2 H, H-3°). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.4 (C=O), 138.5, 138.4, 138.2, 137.7, 137.7, 137.6, 137.59, 137.57, 137.5, 137.4, 136.1, 135.7, 133.2, 133.0 (aromatic C), 128.6, 128.5, 128.49, 128.48, 128.45, 128.39, 128.36, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 128.05, 128.1, 128.0, 127.94, 127.90, 127.86, 127.82, 127.78, 127.77, 127.72, 127.67, 127.6, 127.42, 127.35, 127.3, 127.12, 127.11, 127.03, 127.0, 126.4, 126.0, 125.9 (aromatic CH), 98.8 (C-1), 98.7 (C-1), 98.1 (C-1), 97.9 (C-1), 97.8 (C-1), 97.7 (C-1), 80.9 (C-3), 80.8 (C-3), 80.7 (C-3), 76.9 (C-3), 76.1 (C-3), 75.7 (C-3), 74.9, 74.5, 74.4, 73.5, 73.3 (CH2), 73.3 (C-4), 73.2 (C-4), 73.0 (CH2), 72.83 (C-4), 72.80 (CH2), 72.7 (C-4), 72.2, 71.9, 71.7 (CH2), 70.6 (C-5), 70.5 (C-5), 70.1 (C-5), 69.9 (C-5), 69.8 (C-5), 69.6 (C-5), 69.2, 68.3, 68.1, 67.9, 66.8, 66.5, 66.1 (CH2), 64.7 (2 C-2), 63.7 (C-2), 59.5 (C-2), 59.47 (C-2), 59.4 (C-2), 34.2 (C-5°), 29.1 (C-2°), 2575 (C-3°), 24.7 (C-4°).

Synthesis of Hexasaccharide 30

Compound 29 (20 mg, 0.0078 mmol) was dissolved in THF/H2O/tert-BuOH (2 mL/2 mL/1 mL) before a catalytic amount of Pd(OH)2/C was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 days under a H2 atmosphere, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. A white powder 30 (6.7 mg, 76%) was obtained after purification by gel filtration (HW-40, 0.15 M NH4OAc in H2O). 1H NMR (D2O, 500 MHz) δ 5.40–5.35 (m, 3 H, 3 H-1), 4.85–4.81 (m, 3 H, 3 H-1), 4.13–4.06 (m, 2 H), 3.97–3.50 (m, 35 H), 3.41–3.37 (m, 1 H), 3.15–3.08 (m, 2 H), 2.81 (dd, 2 H), 2.72–2.70 (m, 2 H), 2.06 (t, 2 H), 1.55–1.43 (m, 5 H), 1.29–1.23 (m, 2 H). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 99.6 (C-1), 99.5 (C-1), 99.5 (C-1), 99.2 (2 C-1), 97.4 (C-1), 76.9, 76.7, 76.6, 76.7, 73.7, 73.3, 72.4, 72.3, 71.9, 71.1, 71.0, 70.5, 69.2, 68.8, 68.4, 68.3, 61.2, 60.6, 60.4, 55.3, 55.3, 54.6, 51.1, 51.1, 51.0, 37.5, 28.3, 25.7, 25.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + 2H]+/2 Calculated for C42H80N6O27: 550.25302; found: 550.25247.

Synthesis of Hexasaccharide 31

Compound 30 (5 mg) was dissolved in H2O. Then, Ac2O and NaHCO3 were added in the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 days until TLC analysis showed complete conversion of the starting materials. The product was purified by gel filtration (HW-40, 0.15 M NH4OAc in H2O). Compound 31 (5.5 mg, 86%) was obtained as a white solid. 1H NMR (D2O, 500 MHz) δ 5.36–5.34 (m, 4 H, 4 H-1), 5.27 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 4.79 (bt, 2 H, 2 H-1), 4.73 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 4.21–4.06 (m, 5 H), 3.97–3.57 (m, 37 H), 3.40–3.35 (m, 1 H), 2.24 (bt, 2 H), 1.97–1.91 (m, 18 H, 6 CH3), 1.80–1.74 (m, 2 H), 1.54–1.46 (m, 4 H), 1.32–1.26 (m, 2 H). 13C-APT (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 180.2, 174.7, 174.69, 174.6, 174.5, 174.46 (6 C=O), 98.2, 98.15, 96.6 (6 C-1), 77.4, 77.2, 76.1, 75.7, 75.4, 72.5, 72.4, 71.8, 71.7, 71.3, 71.2, 70.7, 70.7, 70.4, 68.5, 68.1, 67.9, 67.6, 66.9, 61.6, 60.7, 60.3, 60.0, 54.4, 54.2, 49.9, 34.6, 28.2, 25.0, 24.4, 22.1 (CH3), 22.0 (CH3), 22.0 (CH3), 21.9 (CH3), 21.9 (2 CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + 2H]+/2 Calculated for C54H92O33N6: 676.28472; found: 676.28489.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC grant to L.W.) and the European Research Council (ERC-CoG-726072-“GLYCONTROL”, to J.D.C.C.).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.0c00703.

  • Full experimental details and characterization and NMR spectra of all new compounds (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jo0c00703_si_001.pdf (14.5MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Ramsey D. M.; Wozniak D. J. Understanding the control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa alginate synthesis and the prospects for management of chronic infections in cystic fibrosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 309–322. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Jennings L. K.; Storek K. M.; Ledvina H. E.; Coulon C.; Marmont L. S.; Sadovskaya I.; Secor P. R.; Tseng B. S.; Scian M.; Filloux A.; Wozniak D. J.; Howell P. L.; Parsek M. R. Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 11353–11358. 10.1073/pnas.1503058112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Bamford N. C.; Le Mauff F.; Subramanian A. S.; Yip P.; Millán C.; Zhang Y.; Zacharias C.; Forman A.; Nitz M.; Codée J. D. C.; Usón I.; Sheppard D. C.; Howell P. L. Ega3 from the fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus is an endo-α-1,4-galactos- aminidase that disrupts microbial biofilms. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 13833–13849. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Le Mauff F.; Bamford N. C.; Alnabelseya N.; Zhang Y.; Baker P.; Robinson H.; Codée J. D. C.; Howell P. L.; Sheppard D. C. Molecular mechanism of Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm disruption by fungal and bacterial glycoside hydrolases. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 10760–10772. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kazakova E. D.; Yashunsky D. V.; Krylov V. B.; Bouchara J.-P.; Cornet M.; Valsecchi I.; Fontaine T.; Latgé J.-P.; Nifantiev N. E. Biotinylated Oligo-α-(1 →4)-d-galactosamines and Their N-Acetylated Derivatives: α-Stereoselective Synthesis and Immunology Application. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1175–1179. 10.1021/jacs.9b11703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Imamura A.; Matsuzawa N.; Sakai S.; Udagawa T.; Nakashima S.; Ando H.; Ishida H.; Kiso M. The Origin of High Stereoselectivity in Di-tert-butylsilylene-Directed α-Galactosylation. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9086–9104. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Imamura A.; Ando H.; Korogi S.; Tanabe G.; Muraoka O.; Ishida H.; Kiso M. Di-tert-butylsilylene (DTBS) group-directed α-selective galactosylation unaffected by C-2 participating functionalities. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6725–6728. 10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01647-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Polat T.; Wong C.-H. Anomeric Reactivity-Based One-Pot Synthesis of Heparin-Like Oligosaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12795–12800. 10.1021/ja073098r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hu Y.-P.; Lin S.-Y.; Huang C.-Y.; Zulueta M. M. L.; Liu J.-Y.; Chang W.; Hung S.-C. Synthesis of 3-O-sulfonated heparan sulfate octasaccharides that inhibit the herpes simplex virus type 1 host–cell interaction. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 557–563. 10.1038/nchem.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zulueta M. M. L.; Lin S.-Y.; Lin Y.-T.; Huang C.-J.; Wang C.-C.; Ku C.-C.; Shi Z.; Chyan C.-L.; Irene D.; Lim L.-H.; Tsai T.-I.; Hu Y.-P.; Arco S. D.; Wong C.-H.; Hung S.-C. α-Glycosylation by D-Glucosamine-Derived Donors: Synthesis of Heparosan and Heparin Analogues That Interact with Mycobacterial Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8988–8995. 10.1021/ja302640p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yoshida K.; Yang B.; Yang W.; Zhang Z.; Zhang J.; Huang X. Chemical Synthesis of Syndecan-3 Glycopeptides Bearing Two Heparan Sulfate Glycan Chains. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9051–9058. 10.1002/anie.201404625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Chang C.-H.; Lico L. S.; Huang T.-Y.; Lin S.-Y.; Chang C.-L.; Arco S. D.; Hung S.-C. Synthesis of the Heparin-Based Anticoagulant Drug Fondaparinux. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9876–9879. 10.1002/anie.201404154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Codée J. D. C.; Stubba B.; Schiattarella M.; Overkleeft H. S.; van Boeckel C. A. A.; van Boom J. H.; van der Marel G. A. A Modular Strategy Toward the Synthesis of Heparin-like Oligosaccharides Using Monomeric Building Blocks in a Sequential Glycosylation Strategy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3767–3773. 10.1021/ja045613g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Arungundram S.; Al-Mafraji K.; Asong J.; Leach F. E.; Amster I. J.; Venot A.; Turnbull J. E.; Boons G.-J. Modular Synthesis of Heparan Sulfate Oligosaccharides for Structure-Activity Relationship Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 17394–17405. 10.1021/ja907358k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Orgueira H. A.; Bartolozzi A.; Schell P.; Seeberger P. H. Conformational Locking of the Glycosyl Acceptor for Stereocontrol in the Key Step in the Synthesis of Heparin. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2128–2131. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Park J.; Kawatkar S.; Kim J.-H.; Boons G.-J. Stereoselective Glycosylations of 2-Azido-2-deoxy-glucosides Using Intermediate Sulfonium Ions. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1959–1962. 10.1021/ol070513b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Hagen B.; van Dijk J. H. M.; Zhang Q.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Synthesis of the Staphylococcus aureus Strain M Capsular Polysaccharide Repeating Unit. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 2514–2517. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Zhang Y.; Zhang H.; Zhao Y.; Guo Z.; Gao J. Efficient Strategy for α-Selective Glycosidation of D-Glucosamine and Its Application to the Synthesis of a Bacterial Capsular Polysaccharide Repeating Unit Containing Multiple α-Linked GlcNAc Residues. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 1520–1524. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Casu B. In Structure and Biological Activity of Heparin, Vol. 43; Tipson R. S., Horton D., Eds.; Academic Press, 1985; pp 51–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Turnbull J.; Powell A.; Guimond S. Heparan sulfate: decoding a dynamic multifunctional cell regulator. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11, 75–82. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01897-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Gandhi N. S.; Mancera R. L. The structure of glycosaminoglycans and their interactions with proteins. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 72, 455–482. 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Wei P.; Kerns R. J. Factors Affecting Stereocontrol during Glycosidation of 2,3-Oxazolidinone-Protected 1-Tolylthio-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4195–4198. 10.1021/jo047812o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Li J.; Dai Y.; Li W.; Laval S.; Xu P.; Yu B. Effective Synthesis of α -d-GlcN-(1→4)-D-GlcA/L-IdoA Glycosidic Linkage under Gold(I) Catalysis. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4, 756–762. 10.1002/ajoc.201500113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Ingle A. B.; Chao C.-S.; Hung W.-C.; Mong K.-K. T. Tuning Reactivity of Glycosyl Imidinium Intermediate for 2-Azido-2-deoxyglycosyl Donors in α-Glycosidic Bond Formation. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5290–5293. 10.1021/ol402519c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Manabe S.; Ishii K.; Ito Y. N-Benzyl-2,3-oxazolidinone as a Glycosyl Donor for Selective α-Glycosylation and One-Pot Oligosaccharide Synthesis Involving 1,2-cis-Glycosylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10666–10667. 10.1021/ja062531e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Mensah E. A.; Nguyen H. M. Nickel-Catalyzed Stereoselective Formation of α-2-Deoxy-2-Amino Glycosides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8778–8780. 10.1021/ja903123b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Amin M. N.; Ishiwata A.; Ito Y. Synthesis of N-linked glycan derived from Gram-negative bacterium, Campylobacter jejuni. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 8181–8198. 10.1016/j.tet.2007.05.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Oka N.; Kajino R.; Takeuchi K.; Nagakawa H.; Ando K. α-Selective Ribofuranosylation of Alcohols with Ribofuran- osyl Iodides and Triphenylphosphine Oxide. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 7656–7664. 10.1021/jo500632h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kobashi Y.; Mukaiyama T. Glycosyl Phosphonium Halide as a Reactive Intermediate in Highly α-Selective Glycosylation. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 910–916. 10.1246/bcsj.78.910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Mukaiyama T.; Kobashi Y. Highly α-Selective Synthesis of Disaccharide Using Glycosyl Bromide by the Promotion of Phosphine Oxide. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 10–11. 10.1246/cl.2004.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Kobashi Y.; Mukaiyama T. Highly α-Selective Glycosylation with Glycosyl Acetate via Glycosyl Phosphonium Iodide. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 874–875. 10.1246/cl.2004.874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Lu S. R.; Lai Y. H.; Chen J. H.; Liu C. Y.; Mong K. K. Dimethylformamide: an unusual glycosylation modulator. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7315–7320. 10.1002/anie.201100076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Dourtoglou V.; Gross B. Activation de la Ponction Hydroxyle Anomere via les Sels d’Iminium. O-Glycosylation des Tri-O-benzyl-2,3,5-D-arabino et -ribotorannoses. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1983, 2, 57–73. 10.1080/07328308308058809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Zeng J.; Wang R.; Zhang S.; Fang J.; Liu S.; Sun G.; Xu B.; Xiao Y.; Fu D.; Zhang W.; Hu Y.; Wan Q. Hydrogen-Bonding-Assisted Exogenous Nucleophilic Reagent Effect for β-Selective Glycosylation of Rare 3-Amino Sugars. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 8509–8515. 10.1021/jacs.9b01862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Ngoje G.; Li Z. Study of the stereoselectivity of 2-azido-2-deoxyglucosyl donors: protecting group effects. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 1879–1886. 10.1039/c3ob26994a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b van der Vorm S.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codee J. D. C. Stereoselectivity of Conformationally Restricted Glucosazide Donors. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4793–4811. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Lourenco E. C.; Ventura M. R. Improvement of the stereoselectivity of the glycosylation reaction with 2-azido-2-deoxy-1-thioglucoside donors. Carbohydr. Res. 2016, 426, 33–39. 10.1016/j.carres.2016.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d van der Vorm S.; Hansen T.; van Hengst J. M. A.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Acceptor reactivity in glycosylation reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4688–4706. 10.1039/C8CS00369F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Codée J. D. C.; Litjens R. E. J. N.; van den Bos L. J.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A. Thioglycosides in sequential glycosylation strategies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 769–782. 10.1039/b417138c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Zhang Z.; Ollmann I. R.; Ye X.-S.; Wischnat R.; Baasov T.; Wong C.-H. Programmable One-Pot Oligosaccharide Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 734–753. 10.1021/ja982232s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Douglas N. L.; Ley S. V.; Lücking U.; Warriner S. L. Tuning glycoside reactivity: New tool for efficient oligosaccharide synthesis. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 51–66. 10.1039/a705275h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Andrews C. W.; Rodebaugh R.; Fraser-Reid B. A Solvation-Assisted Model for Estimating Anomeric Reactivity. Predicted versus Observed Trends in Hydrolysis of n-Pentenyl Glycosides. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5280–5289. 10.1021/jo9601223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. a Hagen B.; Ali S.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Mapping the Reactivity and Selectivity of 2-Azidofucosyl Donors for the Assembly of N-Acetylfucosamine-Containing Bacterial Oligosaccharides. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 848–868. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b van der Vorm S.; Hansen T.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1867–1875. 10.1039/C6SC04638J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c van der Vorm S.; Hansen T.; van Hengst J. M. A.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Acceptor reactivity in glycosylation reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4688–4706. 10.1039/C8CS00369F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Wang L.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Reagent Controlled Stereoselective Synthesis of α-Glucans. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 4632–4638. 10.1021/jacs.8b00669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wang L.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C. Reagent Controlled Stereoselective Assembly of α-(1,3)-Glucans. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 10, 1994–2003. 10.1002/ejoc.201800894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. To shed light on the mode of action of MPF, a low temperature NMR experiment was conducted to study the formed reactive intermediates upon activation of donor 13. Diagnostic signals were observed for the anomeric protons corresponding to the α/β-imidinium ions.
  13. Volbeda A. G.; Kistemaker H. A. V.; Overkleeft H. S.; van der Marel G. A.; Filippov D. V.; Codée J. D. C. Chemoselective Cleavage of p-Methoxybenzyl and 2-Naphthylmethyl Ethers Using a Catalytic Amount of HCl in Hexafluoro-2-propanol. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 8796–8806. 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. a Chan L.; Taylor M. S. Regioselective Alkylation of Carbohydrate Derivatives Catalyzed by a Diarylborinic Acid Derivative. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3090–3093. 10.1021/ol200990e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lee D.; Taylor M. S. Borinic Acid-Catalyzed Regioselective Acylation of Carbohydrate Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3724–3727. 10.1021/ja110332r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Lee D.; Williamson C. L.; Chan L.; Taylor M. S. Regioselective, Borinic Acid-Catalyzed Monoacylation, Sulfonylation and Alkylation of Diols and Carbohydrates: Expansion of Substrate Scope and Mechanistic Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8260–8267. 10.1021/ja302549c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. a Hansen S. U.; Miller G. J.; Barath M.; Broberg K. R.; Avizienyte E.; Helliwell M.; Raftery J.; Jayson G. C.; Gardiner J. M. Synthesis and Scalable Conversion of L-Iduronamides to Heparin-Related Di- and Tetrasaccharides. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 7823–7843. 10.1021/jo300722y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dietrich H.; Espinosa J. F.; Chiara J. L.; Jimenez-Barbero J.; Leon Y.; Varela-Nieto I.; Mato J.-M.; Cano F. H.; Foces-Foces C.; Martin-Lomas M. Glycosyl Inositol Derivatives Related to Inositolphosphoglycan Mediators: Synthesis, Structure, and Biological Activity. Chem. - Eur. J. 1999, 5, 320–336. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Czernecki S.; Ayadi E. Preparation of diversely protected 2-azido-2-deoxyglycopyranoses from glycals. Can. J. Chem. 1995, 73 (3), 343–350. 10.1139/v95-046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo0c00703_si_001.pdf (14.5MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES