Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a nearly ubiquitous β-herpesvirus that establishes latent infection in the majority of the world’s population. HCMV infection profoundly influences the host immune system and, perhaps more than any other human pathogen, has been shown to create a lasting imprint on human T and NK cell compartments. HCMV-seropositivity has been associated with both beneficial effects, such as increased vaccine responsiveness or heterologous protection against infections, and deleterious effects, such as pathological neurodevelopmental sequelae from congenital infection in utero and cumulative damage from chronic lifelong latency into old age. The significance of many of these associations is unclear, as studies into the causal mechanisms linking HCMV and these disease outcomes are lacking; however, HCMV-mediated changes to the immune system may play a key role. This review examines how HCMV impacts the host immune system in an age-dependent manner with important implications for human immunophenotypes and long-term disease risk.
Keywords: human cytomegalovirus, HCMV, herpesvirus, congenital CMV, adaptive NK cell, immunosenescence, vaccines, viral oncology, seroepidemiology
Introduction
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a β-herpesvirus that has co-evolved with humans over millennia and represents an important member of the human virome, a dynamic network of commensal and pathogenic viruses analogous to the microbiome [1,2]. HCMV infects diverse cell types including endothelial, smooth muscle, and antigen-presenting immune cells, and its large genome facilitates a variety of immune evasion strategies that allow the virus to establish lifelong latency [3]. A recent estimate of the worldwide seroprevalence of HCMV was 83% overall, and as high as 96% in some countries, yet population-wide seropositivity rates differ substantially by country [4].
The clinical course of HCMV infection is widely variable and dependent on host age and immune function. Most immunocompetent individuals are asymptomatic or experience a non-specific viral prodrome upon primary infection; however, in utero transmission of HCMV can result in congenital infection with devastating long-term neurologic consequences [5]. Likewise, HCMV primary infection or reactivation in immunocompromised individuals, including transplant recipients and HIV/AIDS patients, can cause multi-organ damage and even death [6].
The immunologic impact of HCMV infection has garnered increased attention in recent years [7,8] as seropositivity has been linked to mortality, immunosenescence, vaccine responsiveness, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [9–13]. Importantly, many studies have reached conflicting conclusions – while some implicate HCMV in driving immunosenescence and disease risk, others suggest it enhances immune function, highlighting the need for more definitive studies [2,14,15]. A seminal study of monozygotic twins discordant for HCMV-seropositivity indicated that greater than 50% of human immune variation between individuals may be attributable to HCMV status, reflecting the significant impact HCMV has on human immunity [16]. In this review, we highlight how HCMV influences the host immune system and acts as an immunomodulator with distinct, age-related implications for health and disease (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Impact of HCMV on health and disease across the lifespan.
A. HCMV-infection in utero is associated with neurodevelopmental delay, sensorineural hearing loss, and increased cancer risk (depicted as brain/neuronal cells/inner ear and pre-leukemic clone), which may be due to the negative impact of pro-inflammatory immune responses in utero on development; B. HCMV-seropositivity is associated with improved influenza vaccine responsiveness and cross-pathogen protection in youth (illustrated by bacterium, vaccine syringe, and influenza virus), as immune activation and priming in the setting of HCMV infection may boost vaccine responsiveness and heterologous pathogen protection; C. HCMV-seropositivity is associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in elderly adults (left demonstrating coronary artery disease/atherosclerosis/vascular dysfunction and right depicting tumorigenesis/glioblastoma/colorectal cancer), which may be due to immune-mediated changes in the host resulting from chronic antigenic stimulation/latent HCMV reactivation. HCMV = human cytomegalovirus. Created with BioRender.
HCMV infection in utero
Congenital HCMV infection affects between 0.5–2.0% of births worldwide [17] and can result from primary maternal HCMV infection, which has a placental transmission rate of 30–40%, or maternal HCMV reactivation/reinfection [17–20]. Approximately 10% of congenitally infected infants are symptomatic at birth and suffer long-term neurologic consequences [5]; another 10–15% develop neurologic sequelae after birth, namely sensorineural hearing loss. Postnatal transmission to preterm low birth weight infants via breast milk can also cause a sepsis-like illness [21].
Despite being previously considered immature, the fetal immune system responds robustly to HCMV in utero [22–24].The fetal immune response to HCMV is characterized by an expansion of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells and proliferation of non-specific differentiated CD28-CD8+ T cells [22,25,26]. Innate-like γδ T cells are an important component of the fetal immune system, as they develop prior to canonical αβ T cells, and HCMV infection in utero induces expansion of specific Vγ9− γδ T cells (Figure 2) [27]. HCMV-induced ‘adaptive’ CD94/NKG2C+ NK cells (discussed below) are also increased in preterm infants with postnatal HCMV infection and children with past congenital HCMV infection, although they have not been observed in HCMV-infected infants at birth [28–31].
Figure 2. Imprint of HCMV on human immune cell compartments.
HCMV induces major immunophenotypic changes in three main immune cell subsets 1) “classic” αβ T cells including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, 2) NK cells, and 3) “innate-like” γδ T cells. These phenotypic changes are characterized by immune activation and differentiation, which may modulate disease risk over the life course. HCMV = human cytomegalovirus, TCR = T cell receptor, KIR = killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, TEM = effector memory T cell, TEMRA = CD45RA+ effector memory T cell. Created with BioRender.
The long-term significance of HCMV-mediated changes in neonatal immune cell populations remains unclear, yet subsequent disease risk distinct from long-recognized neurologic sequelae is becoming increasingly apparent. A recent study implicated HCMV infection in utero as an etiologic agent in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), where there was a significantly increased prevalence of HCMV DNA in newborn blood spots of patients who later developed ALL compared to matched controls [32,33]. Mechanisms underlying these disease risks remain largely unexplored. There is evidence that HCMV infection also impacts maternal-fetal immune crosstalk. A recent study demonstrated that HCMV viral peptides can promote degradation of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which facilitates IgG transfer from mother to child in utero; disruption of IgG transfer could impact newborn immunity and predispose to infectious disease susceptibility [34]. Further characterization of the impact of HCMV on the neonatal immune system is warranted, including investigations of whether congenital HCMV infection impairs passive maternal immunity or perturbs early life NK, T and B cell development.
Immune responses to HCMV infection in early life
Over the course of human and HCMV co-evolution, most individuals were likely infected during childhood when HCMV infection is benign, with no known long-term disease risks. Full-term infants and young children who acquire HCMV postnatally generate HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells, but few HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells [35]. Despite the induction of HCMV-specific immune responses, children demonstrate prolonged mucosal viral shedding, sometimes lasting years, reflecting inadequate viral control [35–37]. Overall, the T cell compartment of seropositive children contains more differentiated (CD28-) and polyfunctional (CD57+) CD8+ T cells than seronegative children, mirroring CD8+ T cell changes seen in HCMV-seropositive adults [25,26,38]. CD94/NKG2C+ NK cells are also expanded in HCMV-seropositive children [37].
Despite evidence of immune activation in both T and NK cell compartments, few studies have examined whether HCMV infection in childhood impacts responses to pediatric vaccines or whether it has a positive or negative impact on immune responses to heterologous pathogens. Notably, priming of the early life immune system with the BCG vaccine has been shown to confer such protection and it is interesting to hypothesize whether HCMV infection in childhood could have similar positive implications for “trained immunity” [39]. Thus, while HCMV-infection in utero is deleterious, early childhood infection appears to have minimal effects on the health of infected children, though whether early life HCMV infection has beneficial impacts requires further study.
Impact of HCMV on adult T and NK cell compartments
Latent HCMV infection has a profound effect on the adult host immune system, likely resulting from an evolutionarily negotiated balance between viral persistence and immunologic control [13,14,40]. HCMV-specific T cells are immunodominant in healthy seropositive adults, accounting for nearly 10% of total CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, a phenomenon known as ‘memory inflation’ [40–42]. HCMV-seropositivity has also been associated with an overall increase in specific T cell phenotypes, including differentiated αβ and γδ T cells, and expansion of Vδ2− γδ T cells (Figure 2) [43,44].
HCMV also markedly influences the adult NK cell compartment. Seropositivity is associated with expansion of ‘adaptive’ or ‘memory-like’ CD57+ NK cells (reviewed in [8]), which respond rapidly to repeat viral exposure and express the HCMV-induced activating surface receptor CD94/NKG2C [30,45]. This specialized NK cell subset has increased cytotoxicity and pro-inflammatory cytokine release [8,46,47]. Studies in mice and rhesus macaques, using MCMV and rhCMV, respectively, demonstrated that this adaptive NK memory cell response is conserved across species [48,49]. Furthermore, a recent study showed that NK cell expansion is mediated through HCMV viral peptide/HLA-E interactions, which activate the NKG2C receptor [50]. No other human pathogen is known to exert such a profound persistent effect on the host immune system as demonstrated by the T cell ‘memory inflation’ and ‘adaptive’ memory NK cell expansion seen with HCMV. The initial identification of HCMV-specific immune cell expansion led to widespread concerns that latent HCMV infection might compromise host immunity; however, accumulating evidence suggests that HCMV-seropositivity may enhance immune responses.
Heightened immune responses in HCMV-seropositive adults
Studies evaluating the impact of HCMV-seropositivity on vaccine responses and microbial challenge suggest that HCMV infection boosts immunity in early adulthood. In a study of influenza vaccine responsiveness, HCMV-seropositive young adults had higher magnitude antibody responses, cytokine levels (e.g., IFN-γ), and activated CD8+ T cells following vaccination compared to HCMV-seronegative controls [11]. Following immunological challenge with staphylococcal enterotoxin B, CD8+ T cells from HCMV-seropositive young adults demonstrate polyfunctionality with increased expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and terminal differentiation markers (e.g., CD57+) [51,52]. Similarly, studies in animal models suggest an immune-enhancing effect of latent MCMV infection wherein higher basal cytokine levels and immune activation confer protection from bacterial infection and improve vaccine responsiveness [11,53]. The NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells that expand in seropositive adults also exhibit increased proinflammatory cytokine release and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which may prime the immune system and protect against other infections [8]. Cumulatively, these studies suggest that latent HCMV infection may be mutualistic to anti-pathogen responses, at least during early adulthood/reproductive age. Notably, it is unclear if these studies, which suggest a beneficial impact on heterologous immune responses and vaccine responses, can be generalized to other age groups.
Evidence for and against HCMV-induced immunosenescence
In the early 2000s, landmark epidemiologic studies on aging suggested that HCMV-seropositivity might accelerate normal age-associated deterioration in general immune function (i.e., immunosenescence) and increase mortality in the elderly [10,15,54–56]. Additional contemporaneous studies suggested that seropositive older individuals also had a reduced response to influenza vaccination [57]. More recent follow-up studies [11,58–61] indicate that there is inconclusive evidence as to whether HCMV-seropositivity impacts elderly vaccine responses. One limitation of epidemiological studies of HCMV is that there are very few HCMV seronegative adults in old age, given >80% seroprevalence. The near ubiquity of HCMV seropositivity limits the power of association studies and introduces the caveat that individuals who remain seronegative later in life may have underlying inborn immune abnormalities rather than a lack of HCMV exposure.
Previously, it was postulated that inflation of HCMV-specific T cells due to chronic antigenic stimulation from long-term latent infection compromised T cell diversity and host immunity [15,62–66]. However, a recent study on the impact of HCMV-seropositivity on T cell receptor (TCR) diversity showed that seropositivity does not impact the elderly T cell repertoire [67]. B cell receptor (BCR) diversity is also preserved, and HCMV may even enhance memory B cell activation throughout the lifespan [68,69]. These findings that TCR and BCR repertoires are intact in HCMV-seropositive elderly adults contradict previous notions that latent infection undermines receptor breadth [67]. Thus, the mechanistic evidence for HCMV-induced immunosenescence remains significantly limited, and it is more likely that other HCMV-mediated effects contribute to the association between HCMV seropositivity and increased mortality in old age.
Lifelong HCMV-seropositivity modulates disease risk
HCMV-seropositivity has been implicated as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), which may partially explain its association with increased mortality [12,56,70]. Vascular endothelial cells are a known reservoir for latent HCMV; increased circulating levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, perhaps due to immune activation during latent viral reactivation, may promote CVD pathogenesis [71]. Levels of IL-6 and TNF-α have been correlated with anti-HCMV IgG levels and increased CVD disease risk in HCMV-seropositive individuals [56]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of >35,000 individuals estimated that HCMV-seropositivity was associated with a 22% increased risk of developing CVD (RR =1.22) compared to seronegative individuals, even when controlling for known risk factors such as age, obesity, and smoking (which can increase CVD risk 2-fold) [12]. Importantly, the association between HCMV-seropositivity and CVD has only been observed in developed countries, and is not apparent in populations in the developing world [72]. Thus, the precise mechanisms underlying these associations are unclear, though one study recently implicated the accumulation of CD57+ cytotoxic T cells as a possible driver of CVD in CMV/HIV co-infection [73]. Moreover, evaluation of immune cell subpopulations in atherosclerotic plaques found a correlation between the expansion of activated effector memory T cells, HCMV DNA viral copy number, and risk of an acute coronary event [74]. More research into possible causal mechanisms underlying the associations between HCMV infection, CVD, and immune activation is needed.
Multiple malignancies have been associated with HCMV-seropositivity [13]. In particular, HCMV and MCMV infection have been implicated in the progression of glioblastoma in humans and murine models [75,76]. It is currently unclear whether the presence of viral DNA in malignant tissue is due to viral reactivation within a locally immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment, or if the association between HCMV and malignancy reflects a broader oncomodulatory effect [71,77,78]. It is unknown if HCMV promotes tumorigenesis directly, as HCMV has not been shown to cause malignant transformation like other oncogenic herpesviruses (e.g,. EBV and HHV-8). Immune evasion is a more recently recognized hallmark of cancer, and it is possible that HCMV may modulate cancer susceptibility indirectly through its impact on the host immune system rather than through a direct effect via malignant transformation [3,79]. Furthermore, epidemiologic studies have not shown consistent results linking HCMV-seropositivity and cancer risk [80–82]. Memory inflation of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells was previously hypothesized to be detrimental for tumor immune surveillance in later life [13]; however, it is unlikely that HCMV leads to decreased recognition of tumor neoantigens, as TCR and BCR diversity appears to remain intact in the setting of HCMV-seropositivity [67–69]. Divergent results from these studies demonstrate the need for additional definitive studies on HCMV-mediated mechanisms of cancer risk and progression.
Conclusions
Herein, we describe how the common herpesvirus HCMV profoundly shapes the host immune system and modulates disease risk across the life-course (Figure 1), with distinct age-related effects on healthy human T and NK cell compartments (Figure 2) [83]. Importantly, natural immunity to HCMV is only partially protective against reinfection or mother-to-child transmission [20,84]; work is ongoing to define immune responses that can prevent HCMV acquisition or rapidly contain viral replication to guide vaccine development [85].
The studies described above suggest that HCMV infection is deleterious at the extremes of age, but possibly advantageous in young adulthood. Notably, studies on the impact of HCMV infection in childhood and on pediatric vaccine responses remain limited. Latent HCMV infection may enhance immune responses in youth by increasing circulating proinflammatory cytokines and priming both classic adaptive immune cells such as T cells and unique adaptive NK cells to respond to infection. Interestingly, HCMV-vectored vaccines represent a promising novel vaccine platform that may leverage these benefits by eliciting strong vaccine-elicited T and NK cell responses [86–88]. Increased resistance to heterologous infections in HCMV-seropositive individuals may have conferred a past evolutionary selective advantage, helping to explain the ubiquity of HCMV in the human virome [1,14,89]. While multiple studies suggest that HCMV-seropositivity may be beneficial during reproductive-age, the virus remains an important pathogen and cause of morbidity and mortality in the immunocompromised, elderly, and prenatal populations, and is thus a vital target for vaccine development [90].
Highlights.
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and HCMV-seropositivity have an age-dependent impact on health and disease
HCMV infection is associated with adverse health outcomes at the extremes of age, in utero and in elderly adults, but appears to boost host immunity and vaccine responsiveness in reproductive age
HCMV causes immune activation and expansion of specific subsets of αβ T cells, γδ T cells, and NK cells, which creates a lifelong imprint on memory immune cell populations
Additional mechanistic studies on how these HCMV-mediated immune changes may influence health and disease outcomes across the life course are necessary
Acknowledgements/Funding.
This work was supported by: NIH/NCI R21 to K.M.W. and S.R.P. (R21CA242439-01) and NIH/NIAID R21 (R21-AI147992) to S.R.P.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interest. S.R.P provides consulting services to Moderna, Merck and Co Vaccines, Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi for their preclinical HCMV vaccine programs. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Cadwell K: The virome in host health and disease. Immunity 2015, 42:805–813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davis MM, Brodin P: Rebooting Human Immunology. Annu Rev Immunol 2018, 36:843–864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berry R, Watson GM, Jonjic S, Degli-Esposti MA, Rossjohn J: Modulation of innate and adaptive immunity by cytomegaloviruses. Nat Rev Immunol 2020, 20:113–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zuhair M, Smit GSA, Wallis G, Jabbar F, Smith C, Devleesschauwer B, Griffiths P: Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol 2019, 29:e2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dollard SC, Grosse SD, Ross DS: New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol 2007, 17:355–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dioverti MV, Razonable RR: Cytomegalovirus. Microbiol Spectr 2016, 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Klenerman P, Oxenius A: T cell responses to cytomegalovirus. Nat Rev Immunol 2016, 16:367–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rolle A, Brodin P: Immune Adaptation to Environmental Influence: The Case of NK Cells and HCMV. Trends Immunol 2016, 37:233–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thomasini RL, Pereira DS, Pereira FSM, Mateo EC, Mota TN, Guimaraes GG, Pereira LSM, Lima CX, Teixeira MM, Teixeira ALJ: Aged-associated cytomegalovirus and Epstein- Barr virus reactivation and cytomegalovirus relationship with the frailty syndrome in older women. PLoS One 2017, 12:e0180841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Olsson J, Wikby A, Johansson B, Lofgren S, Nilsson BO, Ferguson FG: Age-related change in peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subpopulations and cytomegalovirus infection in the very old: the Swedish longitudinal OCTO immune study. Mech Ageing Dev 2000, 121:187–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Furman D, Jojic V, Sharma S, Shen-Orr SS, Angel CJ, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Kidd BA, Maecker HT, Concannon P, Dekker CL, et al. : Cytomegalovirus infection enhances the immune response to influenza. Sci Transl Med 2015, 7:281ra243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang H, Peng G, Bai J, He B, Huang K, Hu X, Liu D: Cytomegalovirus Infection and Relative Risk of Cardiovascular Disease (Ischemic Heart Disease, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Death): A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Up to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc 2017, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luo XH, Meng Q, Rao M, Liu Z, Paraschoudi G, Dodoo E, Maeurer M: The impact of inflationary cytomegalovirus-specific memory T cells on anti-tumour immune responses in patients with cancer. Immunology 2018, 155:294–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Picarda G, Benedict CA: Cytomegalovirus: Shape-Shifting the Immune System. J Immunol 2018, 200:3881–3889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pawelec G, Gouttefangeas C: T-cell dysregulation caused by chronic antigenic stress: the role of CMV in immunosenescence? Aging Clin Exp Res 2006, 18:171–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brodin P, Jojic V, Gao T, Bhattacharya S, Angel CJ, Furman D, Shen-Orr S, Dekker CL, Swan GE, Butte AJ, et al. : Variation in the human immune system is largely driven by non-heritable influences. Cell 2015, 160:37–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK: The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013, 26:86–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ: Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 2007, 17:253–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lanzieri TM, Dollard SC, Bialek SR, Grosse SD: Systematic review of the birth prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in developing countries. Int J Infect Dis 2014, 22:44–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Permar SR, Schleiss MR, Plotkin SA: Advancing Our Understanding of Protective Maternal Immunity as a Guide for Development of Vaccines To Reduce Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infections. J Virol 2018, 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ehlinger EP, Webster EM, Kang HH, Cangialose A, Simmons AC, Barbas KH, Burchett SK, Gregory ML, Puopolo KM, Permar SR: Maternal cytomegalovirus-specific immune responses and symptomatic postnatal cytomegalovirus transmission in very low- birth-weight preterm infants. J Infect Dis 2011, 204:1672–1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gibson L, Dooley S, Trzmielina S, Somasundaran M, Fisher D, Revello MG, Luzuriaga K: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IE1- and pp65-specific CD8+ T cell responses broaden over time after primary CMV infection in infants. J Infect Dis 2007, 195:1789–1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gibson L, Piccinini G, Lilleri D, Revello MG, Wang Z, Markel S, Diamond DJ, Luzuriaga K: Human cytomegalovirus proteins pp65 and immediate early protein 1 are common targets for CD8+ T cell responses in children with congenital or postnatal human cytomegalovirus infection. J Immunol 2004, 172:2256–2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marchant A, Appay V, Van Der Sande M, Dulphy N, Liesnard C, Kidd M, Kaye S, Ojuola O, Gillespie GM, Vargas Cuero AL, et al. : Mature CD8(+) T lymphocyte response to viral infection during fetal life. J Clin Invest 2003, 111:1747–1755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miles DJ, van der Sande M, Jeffries D, Kaye S, Ismaili J, Ojuola O, Sanneh M, Touray ES, Waight P, Rowland-Jones S, et al. : Cytomegalovirus infection in Gambian infants leads to profound CD8 T-cell differentiation. J Virol 2007, 81:5766–5776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miles DJ, van der Sande M, Jeffries D, Kaye S, Ojuola O, Sanneh M, Cox M, Palmero MS, Touray ES, Waight P, et al. : Maintenance of large subpopulations of differentiated CD8 T-cells two years after cytomegalovirus infection in Gambian infants. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vermijlen D, Brouwer M, Donner C, Liesnard C, Tackoen M, Van Rysselberge M, Twite N, Goldman M, Marchant A, Willems F: Human cytomegalovirus elicits fetal gammadelta T cell responses in utero. J Exp Med 2010, 207:807–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Noyola DE, Alarcon A, Noguera-Julian A, Muntasell A, Munoz-Almagro C, Garcia J, Mur A, Fortuny C, Lopez-Botet M: Dynamics of the NK-cell subset redistribution induced by cytomegalovirus infection in preterm infants. Hum Immunol 2015, 76:118–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Noyola DE, Fortuny C, Muntasell A, Noguera-Julian A, Munoz-Almagro C, Alarcon A, Juncosa T, Moraru M, Vilches C, Lopez-Botet M: Influence of congenital human cytomegalovirus infection and the NKG2C genotype on NK-cell subset distribution in children. Eur J Immunol 2012, 42:3256–3266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guma M, Angulo A, Vilches C, Gomez-Lozano N, Malats N, Lopez-Botet M: Imprint of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire. Blood 2004, 104:3664–3671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guma M, Budt M, Saez A, Brckalo T, Hengel H, Angulo A, Lopez-Botet M: Expansion of CD94/NKG2C+ NK cells in response to human cytomegalovirus-infected fibroblasts. Blood 2006, 107:3624–3631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Francis SS, Wallace AD, Wendt GA, Li L, Liu F, Riley LW, Kogan S, Walsh KM, de Smith AJ, Dahl GV, et al. : In utero cytomegalovirus infection and development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017, 129:1680–1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wiemels JL, Talback M, Francis SS, Feychting M: Early infection with cytomegalovirus and risk of childhood hematological malignancies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu X, Palaniyandi S, Zhu I, Tang J, Li W, Wu X, Ochsner SP, Pauza CD, Cohen JI, Zhu X: Human cytomegalovirus evades antibody-mediated immunity through endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of the FcRn receptor. Nat Commun 2019, 10:3020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tu W, Chen S, Sharp M, Dekker C, Manganello AM, Tongson EC, Maecker HT, Holmes TH, Wang Z, Kemble G, et al. : Persistent and selective deficiency of CD4+ T cell immunity to cytomegalovirus in immunocompetent young children. J Immunol 2004, 172:3260–3267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lidehall AK, Engman ML, Sund F, Malm G, Lewensohn-Fuchs I, Ewald U, Totterman TH, Karltorp E, Korsgren O, Eriksson BM: Cytomegalovirus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in infants and children. Scand J Immunol 2013, 77:135–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Monsivais-Urenda A, Noyola-Cherpitel D, Hernandez-Salinas A, Garcia-Sepulveda C, Romo N, Baranda L, Lopez-Botet M, Gonzalez-Amaro R: Influence of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire in children. Eur J Immunol 2010, 40:1418–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miles DJ, Sande M, Kaye S, Crozier S, Ojuola O, Palmero MS, Sanneh M, Touray ES, Waight P, Rowland-Jones S, et al. : CD4(+) T cell responses to cytomegalovirus in early life: a prospective birth cohort study. J Infect Dis 2008, 197:658–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Khader SA, Divangahi M, Hanekom W, Hill PC, Maeurer M, Makar KW, Mayer-Barber KD, Mhlanga MM, Nemes E, Schlesinger LS, et al. : Targeting innate immunity for tuberculosis vaccination. J Clin Invest 2019, 129:3482–3491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sylwester AW, Mitchell BL, Edgar JB, Taormina C, Pelte C, Ruchti F, Sleath PR, Grabstein KH, Hosken NA, Kern F, et al. : Broadly targeted human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dominate the memory compartments of exposed subjects. J Exp Med 2005, 202:673–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.O’Hara GA, Welten SP, Klenerman P, Arens R: Memory T cell inflation: understanding cause and effect. Trends Immunol 2012, 33:84–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chidrawar S, Khan N, Wei W, McLarnon A, Smith N, Nayak L, Moss P: Cytomegalovirus- seropositivity has a profound influence on the magnitude of major lymphoid subsets within healthy individuals. Clin Exp Immunol 2009, 155:423–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kallemeijn MJ, Boots AMH, van der Klift MY, Brouwer E, Abdulahad WH, Verhaar JAN, van Dongen JJM, Langerak AW: Ageing and latent CMV infection impact on maturation, differentiation and exhaustion profiles of T-cell receptor gammadelta T-cells. Sci Rep 2017, 7:5509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pitard V, Roumanes D, Lafarge X, Couzi L, Garrigue I, Lafon ME, Merville P, Moreau JF, Dechanet-Merville J: Long-term expansion of effector/memory Vdelta2-gammadelta T cells is a specific blood signature of CMV infection. Blood 2008, 112:1317–1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Foley B, Cooley S, Verneris MR, Curtsinger J, Luo X, Waller EK, Anasetti C, Weisdorf D, Miller JS: Human cytomegalovirus (CMV)-induced memory-like NKG2C(+) NK cells are transplantable and expand in vivo in response to recipient CMV antigen. J Immunol 2012, 189:5082–5088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Della Chiesa M, Falco M, Bertaina A, Muccio L, Alicata C, Frassoni F, Locatelli F, Moretta L, Moretta A: Human cytomegalovirus infection promotes rapid maturation of NK cells expressing activating killer Ig-like receptor in patients transplanted with NKG2C−/− umbilical cord blood. J Immunol 2014, 192:1471–1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lopez-Verges S, Milush JM, Schwartz BS, Pando MJ, Jarjoura J, York VA, Houchins JP, Miller S, Kang SM, Norris PJ, et al. : Expansion of a unique CD57(+)NKG2Chi natural killer cell subset during acute human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:14725–14732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Adams NM, Geary CD, Santosa EK, Lumaquin D, Le Luduec JB, Sottile R, van der Ploeg K, Hsu J, Whitlock BM, Jackson BT, et al. : Cytomegalovirus Infection Drives Avidity Selection of Natural Killer Cells. Immunity 2019, 50:1381–1390.e1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shah SV, Manickam C, Ram DR, Kroll K, Itell H, Permar SR, Barouch DH, Klatt NR, Reeves RK: CMV Primes Functional Alternative Signaling in Adaptive Deltag NK Cells but Is Subverted by Lentivirus Infection in Rhesus Macaques. Cell Rep 2018, 25:2766–2774.e2763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hammer Q, Ruckert T, Borst EM, Dunst J, Haubner A, Durek P, Heinrich F, Gasparoni G, Babic M, Tomic A, et al. : Peptide-specific recognition of human cytomegalovirus strains controls adaptive natural killer cells. Nat Immunol 2018, 19:453–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pera A, Campos C, Corona A, Sanchez-Correa B, Tarazona R, Larbi A, Solana R: CMV latent infection improves CD8+ T response to SEB due to expansion of polyfunctional CD57+ cells in young individuals. PLoS One 2014, 9:e88538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pera A, Vasudev A, Tan C, Kared H, Solana R, Larbi A: CMV induces expansion of highly polyfunctional CD4+ T cell subset coexpressing CD57 and CD154. J Leukoc Biol 2017, 101:555–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barton ES, White DW, Cathelyn JS, Brett-McClellan KA, Engle M, Diamond MS, Miller VL, Virgin HWt: Herpesvirus latency confers symbiotic protection from bacterial infection. Nature 2007, 447:326–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wikby A, Johansson B, Olsson J, Lofgren S, Nilsson BO, Ferguson F: Expansions of peripheral blood CD8 T-lymphocyte subpopulations and an association with cytomegalovirus seropositivity in the elderly: the Swedish NONA immune study. Exp Gerontol 2002, 37:445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pawelec G, Akbar A, Caruso C, Effros R, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Wikby A: Is immunosenescence infectious? Trends Immunol 2004, 25:406–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Roberts ET, Haan MN, Dowd JB, Aiello AE: Cytomegalovirus antibody levels, inflammation, and mortality among elderly Latinos over 9 years of follow-up. Am J Epidemiol 2010, 172:363–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Trzonkowski P, Mysliwska J, Szmit E, Wieckiewicz J, Lukaszuk K, Brydak LB, Machala M, Mysliwski A: Association between cytomegalovirus infection, enhanced proinflammatory response and low level of anti-hemagglutinins during the anti- influenza vaccination--an impact of immunosenescence. Vaccine 2003, 21:3826–3836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Frasca D, Diaz A, Romero M, Landin AM, Blomberg BB: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity decreases B cell responses to the influenza vaccine. Vaccine 2015, 33:1433–1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Strindhall J, Ernerudh J, Morner A, Waalen K, Lofgren S, Matussek A, Bengner M: Humoral response to influenza vaccination in relation to pre-vaccination antibody titres, vaccination history, cytomegalovirus serostatus and CD4/CD8 ratio. Infect Dis (Lond) 2016, 48:436–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.den Elzen WP, Vossen AC, Cools HJ, Westendorp RG, Kroes AC, Gussekloo J: Cytomegalovirus infection and responsiveness to influenza vaccination in elderly residents of long-term care facilities. Vaccine 2011, 29:4869–4874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Derhovanessian E, Theeten H, Hahnel K, Van Damme P, Cools N, Pawelec G: Cytomegalovirus-associated accumulation of late-differentiated CD4 T-cells correlates with poor humoral response to influenza vaccination. Vaccine 2013, 31:685–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Almanzar G, Schwaiger S, Jenewein B, Keller M, Herndler-Brandstetter D, Wurzner R, Schonitzer D, Grubeck-Loebenstein B: Long-term cytomegalovirus infection leads to significant changes in the composition of the CD8+ T-cell repertoire, which may be the basis for an imbalance in the cytokine production profile in elderly persons. J Virol 2005, 79:3675–3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ouyang Q, Wagner WM, Wikby A, Walter S, Aubert G, Dodi AI, Travers P, Pawelec G: Large numbers of dysfunctional CD8+ T lymphocytes bearing receptors for a single dominant CMV epitope in the very old. J Clin Immunol 2003, 23:247–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Moss P, Khan N: CD8(+) T-cell immunity to cytomegalovirus. Hum Immunol 2004, 65:456–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Khan N, Hislop A, Gudgeon N, Cobbold M, Khanna R, Nayak L, Rickinson AB, Moss PA: Herpesvirus-specific CD8 T cell immunity in old age: cytomegalovirus impairs the response to a coresident EBV infection. J Immunol 2004, 173:7481–7489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vescovini R, Biasini C, Fagnoni FF, Telera AR, Zanlari L, Pedrazzoni M, Bucci L, Monti D, Medici MC, Chezzi C, et al. : Massive load of functional effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against cytomegalovirus in very old subjects. J Immunol 2007, 179:4283–4291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lindau P, Mukherjee R, Gutschow MV, Vignali M, Warren EH, Riddell SR, Makar KW, Turtle CJ, Robins HS: Cytomegalovirus Exposure in the Elderly Does Not Reduce CD8 T Cell Repertoire Diversity. J Immunol 2019, 202:476–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang C, Liu Y, Xu LT, Jackson KJ, Roskin KM, Pham TD, Laserson J, Marshall EL, Seo K, Lee JY, et al. : Effects of aging, cytomegalovirus infection, and EBV infection on human B cell repertoires. J Immunol 2014, 192:603–611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.de Bourcy CF, Angel CJ, Vollmers C, Dekker CL, Davis MM, Quake SR: Phylogenetic analysis of the human antibody repertoire reveals quantitative signatures of immune senescence and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017, 114:1105–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gkrania-Klotsas E, Langenberg C, Sharp SJ, Luben R, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ: Higher immunoglobulin G antibody levels against cytomegalovirus are associated with incident ischemic heart disease in the population-based EPIC-Norfolk cohort. J Infect Dis 2012, 206:1897–1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Soderberg-Naucler C: Does cytomegalovirus play a causative role in the development of various inflammatory diseases and cancer? J Intern Med 2006, 259:219–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stockdale L, Nash S, Nalwoga A, Painter H, Asiki G, Fletcher H, Newton R: Human cytomegalovirus epidemiology and relationship to tuberculosis and cardiovascular disease risk factors in a rural Ugandan cohort. PLoS One 2018, 13:e0192086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen B, Morris SR, Panigrahi S, Michaelson GM, Wyrick JM, Komissarov AA, Potashnikova D, Lebedeva A, Younes SA, Harth K, et al. : Cytomegalovirus Coinfection Is Associated with Increased Vascular-Homing CD57(+) CD4 T Cells in HIV Infection. J Immunol 2020, 204:2722–2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nikitskaya E, Lebedeva A, Ivanova O, Maryukhnich E, Shpektor A, Grivel JC, Margolis L, Vasilieva E: Cytomegalovirus-Productive Infection Is Associated With Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc 2016, 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Krenzlin H, Behera P, Lorenz V, Passaro C, Zdioruk M, Nowicki MO, Grauwet K, Zhang H, Skubal M, Ito H, et al. : Cytomegalovirus promotes murine glioblastoma growth via pericyte recruitment and angiogenesis. J Clin Invest 2019, 129:1671–1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Soroceanu L, Matlaf L, Khan S, Akhavan A, Singer E, Bezrookove V, Decker S, Ghanny S, Hadaczek P, Bengtsson H, et al. : Cytomegalovirus Immediate-Early Proteins Promote Stemness Properties in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2015, 75:3065–3076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Joseph GP, McDermott R, Baryshnikova MA, Cobbs CS, Ulasov IV: Cytomegalovirus as an oncomodulatory agent in the progression of glioma. Cancer Lett 2017, 384:79–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mitchell DA, Xie W, Schmittling R, Learn C, Friedman A, McLendon RE, Sampson JH: Sensitive detection of human cytomegalovirus in tumors and peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2008, 10:10–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011, 144:646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Herne KL, Talpur R, Breuer-McHam J, Champlin R, Duvic M: Cytomegalovirus seropositivity is significantly associated with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Blood 2003, 101:2132–2136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Steininger C, Rassenti LZ, Vanura K, Eigenberger K, Jager U, Kipps TJ, Mannhalter C, Stilgenbauer S, Popow-Kraupp T: Relative seroprevalence of human herpes viruses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Eur J Clin Invest 2009, 39:497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lehrer S, Green S, Ramanathan L, Rosenzweig K, Labombardi V: No consistent relationship of glioblastoma incidence and cytomegalovirus seropositivity in whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Anticancer Res 2012, 32:1113–1115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bayard C, Lepetitcorps H, Roux A, Larsen M, Fastenackels S, Salle V, Vieillard V, Marchant A, Stern M, Boddaert J, et al. : Coordinated expansion of both memory T cells and NK cells in response to CMV infection in humans. Eur J Immunol 2016, 46:1168–1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ross SA, Arora N, Novak Z, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Boppana SB: Cytomegalovirus reinfections in healthy seroimmune women. J Infect Dis 2010, 201:386–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nelson CS, Huffman T, Jenks JA, Cisneros de la Rosa E, Xie G, Vandergrift N, Pass RF, Pollara J, Permar SR: HCMV glycoprotein B subunit vaccine efficacy mediated by nonneutralizing antibody effector functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018, 115:6267–6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Früh K, Picker L: CD8+ T cell programming by cytomegalovirus vectors: applications in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination. Curr Opin Immunol 2017, 47:52–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Goodier MR, Jonjić S, Riley EM, Juranić Lisnić V: CMV and natural killer cells: shaping the response to vaccination. Eur J Immunol 2018, 48:50–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Abad-Fernandez M, Goonetilleke N: Human cytomegalovirus-vectored vaccines against HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2019, 14:137–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Souquette A, Frere J, Smithey M, Sauce D, Thomas PG: A constant companion: immune recognition and response to cytomegalovirus with aging and implications for immune fitness. Geroscience 2017, 39:293–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nelson CS, Herold BC, Permar SR: A new era in cytomegalovirus vaccinology: considerations for rational design of next-generation vaccines to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus infection. NPJ Vaccines 2018, 3:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]