Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2020 Nov 25;23(12):101844. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101844

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and Exosome Profiling from a Year-Long Human Spaceflight Reveals Circulating Biomarkers

Daniela Bezdan 1,18, Kirill Grigorev 1, Cem Meydan 1,6,7, Fanny A Pelissier Vatter 2, Michele Cioffi 2, Varsha Rao 3, Matthew MacKay 1, Kiichi Nakahira 4, Philip Burnham 5, Ebrahim Afshinnekoo 1,6,7, Craig Westover 1, Daniel Butler 1, Chris Mozsary 1, Timothy Donahoe 1, Jonathan Foox 1, Tejaswini Mishra 3, Serena Lucotti 2, Brinda K Rana 8, Ari M Melnick 9, Haiying Zhang 10, Irina Matei 2, David Kelsen 10, Kenneth Yu 10, David C Lyden 2, Lynn Taylor 11, Susan M Bailey 11, Michael P Snyder 3, Francine E Garrett-Bakelman 9,12,13,14, Stephan Ossowski 15, Iwijn De Vlaminck 16, Christopher E Mason 1,6,7,17,19,
PMCID: PMC7756145  PMID: 33376973

Summary

Liquid biopsies based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or exosomes provide a noninvasive approach to monitor human health and disease but have not been utilized for astronauts. Here, we profile cfDNA characteristics, including fragment size, cellular deconvolution, and nucleosome positioning, in an astronaut during a year-long mission on the International Space Station, compared to his identical twin on Earth and healthy donors. We observed a significant increase in the proportion of cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) inflight, and analysis of post-flight exosomes in plasma revealed a 30-fold increase in circulating exosomes and patient-specific protein cargo (including brain-derived peptides) after the year-long mission. This longitudinal analysis of astronaut cfDNA during spaceflight and the exosome profiles highlights their utility for astronaut health monitoring, as well as cf-mtDNA levels as a potential biomarker for physiological stress or immune system responses related to microgravity, radiation exposure, and the other unique environmental conditions of spaceflight.

Subject Areas: Space Medicine, Omics

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Liquid biopsy can monitor the health conditions of astronauts during spaceflight

  • Increases in cell-free mitochondrial DNA were found during spaceflight

  • Post-flight astronaut blood had exosome increases and brain-derived peptides

  • Controls for sampling from the ISS can correct for technical noise


Space Medicine; Omics

Introduction

A wide range of physiological effects impact the human body during a prolonged stay in microgravity, such as headward fluid shift, atrophy of muscles, and decreases in bone density, which have been described for astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) (Williams et al., 2009). In recent years, an increasing number of government and private space agencies have formed, and missions to the Moon and Mars are now planned for the late 2020s and 2030s (Iosim et al., 2019). These pending missions may span 30 months and require landing on a planet with almost no clinical infrastructure for medical monitoring or treatments. Yet, data on physiological changes of long-term missions (>6 months) are almost non-existent. These long-duration missions and the increasing exposure of humans to spaceflight-specific conditions necessitate the study of molecular changes in the human body induced by exposure to spaceflight stressors such as microgravity, radiation, noise, restricted diet, and reduced physical work opportunities. The NASA Twins Study (Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019) enabled interrogation of the impact of prolonged spaceflight on the human biology and cell-to-cell variations in the immune system (Gertz et al., 2020); however, there has never been a study on the impact of spaceflight on cell-free DNA (cfDNA).

Molecular signatures informative of human health and disease can be found in cfDNA and nucleic acids isolated from plasma, saliva, or urine (Heitzer et al., 2018; Hummel et al., 2018; Siravegna et al., 2017; Verhoeven et al., 2018; Volik et al., 2016). Non-invasive methods for monitoring health-related biomarkers in liquids such as plasma (“liquid biopsy”) have already been successfully introduced in a wide range of contexts, including prenatal testing for detection of trisomy and micro-deletions (Bianchi et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2019), cancer diagnostics (Bettegowda et al., 2014; Diehl et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2017), monitoring of cancer therapies (Birkenkamp-Demtröder et al., 2016; Wan et al., 2020), monitoring of the health of solid organ transplants (Verhoeven et al., 2018; De Vlaminck et al., 2014), and screening for infections (Blauwkamp et al., 2019; Burnham et al., 2018; De Vlaminck et al., 2013). Hence, liquid biopsy is a potentially useful method for monitoring physiologic conditions of astronauts before, during, and after spaceflight.

Indeed, cfDNA is extremely dynamic and responsive, providing strong indicators of DNA damage and tumor growth in distal tissues (Newman et al., 2016), immune response or infection (Zwirner et al., 2018), and RNA regulatory changes, with an innate capacity to reveal the cells of origin undergoing apoptosis or necrosis (Thierry et al., 2016). Various studies have reported changes in cfDNA concentration (Zwirner et al., 2018), cfDNA fragment length distribution (Mouliere et al., 2011; Underhill et al., 2016), mutation profiles and signatures (Newman et al., 2016), and cfDNA methylation (Shen et al., 2018) indicative of physiological conditions such as cancer. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can also be found in the extracellular space, circulating as short DNA fragments, encapsulated in vesicles and even as whole functional mitochondria (Al Amir Dache et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020). Several recent studies observed increased levels of cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) in psychological conditions (Lindqvist et al., 2016, 2018) and reduced cf-mtDNA levels in hepatitis-B-infected patients associated with a higher risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (Li et al., 2016). However, since no such information exists for using these metrics for astronauts, we investigated the utility of cfDNA for the monitoring of the physiologic conditions of astronauts to spaceflight.

Of note, cfDNA comprises the footprints of nucleosomes, and these nucleosome features enable tracing of the tissue of origin for cfDNA in normal and disease states, through analysis of nuclear architecture, gene structure, and expression (Murtaza and Caldas, 2016; Snyder et al., 2016). In particular, nucleosome positioning and depletion of short cfDNA sequences reveal footprints of transcription factor binding, promoter activity, and splicing, ultimately informing gene regulatory processes in the tissue/cell of origin (Snyder et al., 2016). Similar information can be revealed from exosomes, which are nano-sized vesicles (size 30–150nm) derived from perinuclear luminal membranes of late endosomes/multivesicular bodies and released into extracellular environment via multivesicular body fusion within the cell membrane ((Kalluri and LeBleu, 2020; Mathieu et al., 2019)) that can mediate long-range physiological cross-talk (Hoshino et al., 2015; Mathieu et al., 2019). Exosomes act as vehicles for horizontal transfer of information through their cargo: proteins, lipids, metabolites, and DNA, as well as coding and non-coding RNAs (Valadi et al., 2007; Wortzel et al., 2019). Moreover, exosomes can be powerful mediators of responses to environmental stimuli as external and physiological stress impact their release, cargo, and function, contributing to pathogenesis (Harmati et al., 2019; O'Neill et al., 2019; Qin et al., 2020). Since exosomes are abundant in plasma, they are critical components of liquid biopsies (Colombo et al., 2014; Hoshino et al., 2020), and analysis of their content can complement the information obtained from cfDNA, but there is no information about exosomes in astronauts.

To address this gap in knowledge, we profiled cfDNA isolated from plasma samples before, during, and after the one-year mission on the ISS to evaluate the utility of cfDNA as a means to monitor physiological problems during extended missions in space. We also profiled the exosomes of both astronauts after the mission completion. While bulk RNA sequencing data have shown widespread gene expression changes in astronauts, including mitochondrial RNA (mtRNA) spikes in flight samples from the one-year mission (Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019), there has not yet been a study of astronauts that has leveraged cfDNA and exosomes. We focused on quantitative measures such as the levels of mtDNA, cfDNA fragment length, and the depletion of nucleosome signatures at transcription start sites. Together, our Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) results provide a “whole-body molecular scan”, which can provide a novel measurement of the impact of spaceflight on the human body, as well as serve as a continued metric of physiology and cellular stress for future long-during missions.

Results

Study Design and Sample Collection

We analyzed circulating cfDNA of a pair of male monozygotic twins over two years, starting when they were both 50 years old. During the NASA Twins Study, the flight subject (TW) was aboard the ISS for 340 days, while his identical twin, the ground subject (HR), remained on Earth. We collected cfDNA at 12 time points from HR and 11 time points from TW. Of the latter, four samples were collected inflight on board of the ISS or space shuttle. In addition, we profiled the cfDNA of an unrelated control subject (MS) to simulate the ambient return (AR) from the ISS. To control for AR effects (return of samples in the Soyuz capsule) on the molecular signatures of cfDNA, we subjected two MS samples and one HR sample to an extended shipping procedure (see Methods). Plasma and cfDNA were extracted using the same protocol for all samples (Methods). We observed a broad range of cfDNA concentration between 6.7 ng/mL and 79.9 ng/mL plasma (mean = 27.9 ng/mL, median = 23 ng/mL) across samples (Table 1). However, we found no significant difference in cfDNA concentrations between flight, ground or control subjects (analysis of variance [ANOVA] p = 0.49, Figure S1A), TW and HR (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.65), and flight and ground samples (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.352). TW showed borderline significantly higher cfDNA concentration pre- and post-flight compared to inflight (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.043); however, this is not significant when comparing TW inflight, TW ground, and HR/MS ground (ANOVA p = 0.4, Figure S1B). Complementary metadata on the health status of TW and HW during the mission have been previously published (Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019), and no deviations in medication or exercise regimen were noted in the medical records.

Table 1.

Overview of All Plasma Samples Obtained during the 1-Year Mission

Time Subject Sample Name Total per Plasma [ng/ml Plasma] mtNd1
Q-PCR [cp/μl Plasma]
Pre-flight graphic file with name fx2.gif GD-114 15.5 44
GD-104 79.9 2159.6
GD-66 11.6 251.7
Flight GD 125 6.7 277
GD 189 20.5 215.1
GD 204 64.4 193.7
GD 298 43.4 1502.8
Post-flight GD+2 60.6 157.7
GD+65 16.1 136.3
GD+137 19.1 68.7
GD+181 7.1 147.3
GD+192 22.9 1165.2
Ambient MS 8.6 3080.6
Return MS_AR 19.7 3590.8
Control MS_AR_1800 16.8 1330.4
Pre-flight graphic file with name fx3.gif L-162 44.8 543.1
L-148 16.3 737.6
L-71 46.9 466
Flight FD 76 20.1 6379.7
FD 259 11.2 786.9
FD 340 22.7 1735.3
Post-flight R+0 16 374.7
R+35 23.5 86.4
R+104 21.5 37.7
R+190 58.8 138.5
R+201 29.9 349.1

Subjects for this mission included the ground subject HR (blue), flight subject TW (green), and control subject MS (yellow). Samples taken on the ISS are highlighted in red. The last two columns show the concentration of cfDNA per ml plasma and the Q-PCR results for the mitochondrial transcript mtNd1 in copy/μl plasma.

Cf-DNA Fragment Length Distribution Is Influenced by the Ambient Return

It has previously been shown that cfDNA derived from tumor cells is shorter than cfDNA derived from healthy cells (Jiang et al., 2015; Mouliere et al., 2011). This effect can be explained by a change in nucleosome binding or by a degradation of nucleotides at the end of nucleosome loops. We therefore hypothesized that environmental stressors such as microgravity or radiation could also impact the length distribution of cfDNA. Indeed, we found a slight shift to longer cfDNA fragment lengths in TW inflight samples (Figure 1A). However, a similar shift was observed in ground samples subjected to AR simulation (Figure 1A, boxplots with yellow border, also see Figure S1). AR samples show a similar peak at the 300 to 400bp fragment length, which is only marginally visible for fresh samples (Figure 1B). Thus, some proportion of long cfDNA fragments likely originate from blood cells damaged during return flight or transport from the ISS.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Size Distribution of cfDNAs in Ambient Return, Ambient Return Simulation, and Fresh Samples

(A) Ambient return simulation samples (control and ground samples with yellow border) show a highly similar pattern as observed for inflight samples (blue box with yellow border). Long cfDNA fragments likely originate from blood cells damaged during transport.

(B) Ambient return samples show an increased fraction of cfDNA with fragment length >300bp compared to fresh samples. Our experimental procedure does only allow interrogation of DNA fragments up to a length of 500bp; thus, the content of long mtDNA fragments contained in intact circulating mitochondria is not reflected in this analysis.

To examine how this might affect other cfDNA fractions, we next examined cf-mtDNA. Recent studies indicate that a prominent fraction of cf-mtDNA in the plasma is contained within intact, circulating mitochondria (Al Amir Dache et al., 2020) and that larger mtDNA fragments can also arise from blood cell degradation. However, our centrifugation step largely removed intact mitochondria and our library preparation comprised mostly smaller DNA fragments (at least 75% are <350bp) (Figure S2), including an even smaller fraction (<10%) of the aligned reads (Figure 2). Thus, the observed fractions of cf-mtDNA are mostly derived from shorter cf-mtDNA molecules and should represent cf-mtDNA that is randomly fragmented and sequenced across the entire mitochondria.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Size Distribution of cf-mtDNAs

We observed a wider range of cf-mtDNA lengths compared to total cfDNA (from 100 to 600bp).

(A) cf-mtDNA size distributions are similar in ground, flight, and control samples and are not affected by ambient return (AR) or AR simulation.

(B) Average length of cf-mtDNA is significantly longer than the average length reported for chromosomal cfDNA (~250bp vs. ~160bp). The average length of cf-mtDNA is not affected by sample type (control, flight, ground) or sample handling (fresh, AR, AR simulation)

As further evidence of this, the mitochondrial genome showed continuous read coverage in all samples, ranging from 50x-200x coverage (Figure S3), regardless of the collection method. Indeed, the length distribution of cf-mtDNA is not affected by AR as observed for chromosomal cfDNA (Figure 2B), and the average length does not change significantly in inflight samples or AR simulation samples. Even though cf-mtDNA amounts can significantly vary based on the donor profiles (Lindqvist et al., 2016) and degree intact vs. fragmented mitochondria, these NGS data showed that the total cf-mtDNA profiles show relative uniformity in both length and proportion of reads (Figure 2).

Levels of Cell-free Mitochondrial DNA Are Increased during Space Flight

Next, we investigated the fraction of cf-mtDNA relative to chromosomal cfDNA in plasma of TW, HR, and MS. In order to characterize the cfDNA originating from mitochondria during spaceflight, we normalized the count of NGS reads mapping to the mitochondrial chromosome by chromosome length and the total number of reads in the library, generating an Read per Kilobase per Million reads (RPKM) measurement. For comparison, we performed the same procedure with reads mapping to chromosome 21. We found a sharp increase of cf-mtDNA for subject TW for inflight samples (Figure 3A) compared to TW ground samples (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.012), compared to HR ground samples (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.018), and compared to all ground samples of HR and TW (Wilcoxon rank test p = 0.0045, ANOVA p = 0.00049). In contrast, we found no significant increase in cfDNA mapping to chromosome 21 (Figure 3B) in TW-inflight compared to ground samples of TW and HR.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of Normalized cfDNA Read Counts by Chromosome, including the Mitochondrial Genome

(A) TW exhibits a significant increase in cell-free mtDNA during space flight compared to TW and HR ground samples. Counts are reads per kilobase per million reads or RPKM.

(B) Chromosomes do not show any change in RPKM during space flight, as exemplified using chr21.

(C) Q-PCR-based validation of increased cf-mtDNA fraction in plasma during space flight.

(D) Normalized cf-mtDNA fraction and fraction of reads mapping to chr21 for 12 time point during the mission (T4-T6 = space flight). The highest increase in cf-mtDNA fraction is observed during the first months on the ISS.

(E) Ambient return simulation using two control samples showed no increase in cf-mtDNA compared to fresh samples but a slight reduction.

(F) Ambient return (AR) simulation using one HR ground sample did not show a significant increase in cf-mtDNA fraction. Two outliers within the fresh samples (FR) indicate that other conditions (e.g. stress, disease, immune reaction) could have influenced cf-mtDNA levels of HR on the ground.

Notably, the mtDNA levels in whole blood increased steadily inflight while on the ISS. Indeed, TW had the highest fraction of cf-mtDNA within the first inflight time point (T4), including more than a 24-fold increase, when compared to ground samples (Figures 3C and 3D). In the two later inflight time points, he had 4- and 8-fold increases compared to pre-flight levels. The normalized levels of chromosome 21 cfDNA were stable for both TW and HR for the duration of the mission (0.25–0.26 RPKM), revealing no obvious bias due to sample handling (Figure 3D). Interestingly, a positive correlation between mtDNA copy number and telomere length in healthy adults has been previously reported, and telomere elongation in blood and urine was also observed during spaceflight for TW (Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019; Luxton et al., 2020).

Given the previously discussed effects of AR on cfDNA lengths, we tested for potential bias in cf-mtDNA levels due to AR. To do this, we compared the cf-mtDNA fraction observed in the MS simulated AR samples (2 samples) to the MS control sample. We found that cf-mtDNA levels were actually lower in AR than in FR samples (Figure 3E), suggesting that the shipping procedure from the ISS is likely not causing the observed increase in cf-mtDNA levels seen in the inflight samples. In addition, the AR simulation of the ground subject (HR) did not show a significant increase of cf-mtDNA levels compared to other HR samples (Figure 3F). Thus, these data suggest that the cf-mtDNA fraction was significantly increased during space flight and not due to the AR blood from ISS transport process.

Nucleosome Positioning Suggests a Shift in Cell of Origin of cfDNA due to Transport Conditions

Given that nucleosome positions are associated with both cfDNA and gene expression (Jiang and Pugh, 2009), we computed the nucleosome depletion around nucleosomes at transcription start sites (TSSs) to infer gene expression (Figure 4A), as previously demonstrated by Ulz and colleagues (Ulz et al., 2016). Indeed, these data indicated that the strength of nucleosome depletion is correlated to bulk gene expression from RNA-seq of the same subjects (Garrett-Bakelman et al., 2019) (Figure 4A), with a decreased coverage at the site of the TSS for highly expressed genes. Second, we identified the nucleosome footprint of CTCF in gene bodies, hypothesizing that nucleosome positioning patterns could reveal broad changes in gene regulation during spaceflight. A t-SNE analysis of TW and HR samples showed no flight-specific clustering (Figure 4B), indicating that nucleosome positioning identified through cfDNA may not be sensitive enough to identify spaceflight-related gene expression changes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

cfDNA Nucleosome Footprinting

(A) Nucleosome depletion in cfDNA around transcription start sites (TSSs) is highly correlated with the expression of the respective genes and can therefore be used to estimate promoter activity and gene expression.

(B) t-SNE based on genome-wide promoter nucleosome footprint of cfDNA samples reveals no clustering of flight subject and ground subject samples.

However, based on the correlations between per-tissue gene expression values (Kim et al., 2014) and nucleosome positioning observed on cfDNA, clear tissue signals in cfDNA were inferred for all plasma samples. Higher values (Pearson's correlation coefficient) suggested higher gene expression and stronger tissue signal (Figure 5A) for hematopoietic lineages (up to rho = 0.156, n = 1087411335), mid-range for the liver, adrenal gland, and retina (0.04–0.07), and less so for other peripheral tissues (e.g. lung, esophagus, 0.00–0.01). These results are consistent with the expected cfDNA prevalence in blood and with previous findings (Snyder et al., 2016). Despite such clear signals on tissue of origin, strong clustering of samples was observed, due to the confounding effect of AR. This was seen in both the tissue-of-origin analysis (Figure 5A) as well as TSS protection (Figure 5B), highlighting the need for controls and correction for any degradation. Further, this analysis does not take into account the cf-mtDNA reads and therefore may not reflect the tissue of origin for mitochondrial reads or heteroplasmy.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Tissue of Origin Deconvolution

(A) Correlation coefficients (multiplied by −1) for each tissue in each sample, clustered by sample and by tissue. The highest signals are, expectedly, from cells of hematopoietic origin. Spaceflight-dependent dynamics of tissue signal are confounded by the effect of ambient return, as suggested by ambient return samples tending to cluster together regardless of other features.

(B) Clustering of samples using TSS protection in cfDNA as a measure of gene expression (lower protection correlates to higher expression). Ambient return samples cluster tightly together and uncover two major clusters of genes whose expression differs significantly from other samples, suggesting transport-related degradation processes or nucleosome detachment. Distribution of mean TSS protection per gene in ambient return and freshsamples is significantly different (t-test p<1e-3).

Analysis of Plasma-Circulating Exosomes Post-flight

To determine how prolonged space missions and Earth re-entry impact circulating exosomes, we analyzed exosomes from the plasma of TW three years post-return to Earth, and compared their size, number, and proteomes to plasma-derived exosomes isolated from HR and 6 age-matched, healthy controls. Exosomes were isolated by differential ultracentrifugation, and both the size and number of exosomes were characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (Figures 6A–6E). While the median size of exosomes was similar between HR, TW, and healthy controls (Figures 6A–6D), the number of particles was ∼30 times higher in TW compared to HR and healthy controls (Figure 6E). Proteomic mass spectrometry analysis revealed that TW, HR, and control exosomes packaged similar numbers of proteins, including a total of 191 exosomal proteins shared among all samples. HR's exosome catalog contained 26 unique proteins, TW exosomes contained 61 unique proteins, and healthy controls contained 105 unique proteins (Figure 6F).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Characterization of Plasma-Derived Exosomes Isolated from HR and TW

(A–E) Plasma samples were collected 3 years (TW) and 9 years (HR) post-flight. Nanosight profiles showing size distribution for exosomes isolated from the plasma of (A) control, (B) HR, and (C) TW. Median size of exosomes (D) and exosome concentration (E) in TW (n = 1), HR (n = 1), and controls (n = 6).

(F) Venn diagram of exosomal proteins identified by mass spectrometry in plasma isolated from HR, TW, and age-matched healthy controls.

(G–J) (G) Heatmap of plasma-derived exosomal proteins for HR, TW, and age-matched healthy controls. Pathway analysis of exclusive plasma-derived exosomal proteins from (H) TW, (I) HR, and (J) age-matched healthy controls.

Hierarchal clustering of the exosomal proteins revealed distinct signatures of HR and TW, which clustered apart from the six controls. Interestingly, classification of the pathways using Metascape (Gene Ontology [GO] processes, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [KEGG] pathways, reactome gene sets, canonical pathways, and Comprehensive Resource of Mammalian Protein Complexes [CORUM] complexes) (Zhou et al., 2019) revealed that TW exosomes were enriched in proteins involved in proteasome pathways (Figure 6H). TW exosomes also packaged CD14, a pro-inflammatory monocyte marker, consistent with the increase in CD14+ monocytes observed post-return to gravity in immune markers studied upon return to Earth (Gertz et al., 2020). Notably, basigin and integrin β1 proteins, which are correlated with cancer progression and inflammation (Hoshino et al., 2015, 2020; Keller et al., 2009; Yoshioka et al., 2014), were also detected in TW exosomes but not in HR or healthy control exosomes.

Consistent with previous findings demonstrating microgravity downregulating adaptive immunity, particularly B cells (Cao et al., 2019), both TW and HR exosomes contained fewer immunoglobulins compared to healthy controls (Figure 6G). Surprisingly, two brain-specific proteins, brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1-associated protein 2 (BAIAP2) and brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1-associated protein 2-like protein 1 (BAIAP2L1), were found in TW plasma-derived exosomes (Table S1, Figure S4A), yet were not detected in the plasma of HR or healthy controls. In contrast, HR exosomal cargo was enriched in proteins associated with regulation of apoptotic pathways (Théry et al., 2001) and ATP biosynthesis (Figure 6I). Moreover, we observed that the 20S proteasome, but not the regulatory 19S proteasome, is found uniquely associated with the plasma-circulating exosomes in the flight subject (TW) 3 years after his return to Earth (Figure 6G). Finally, both TW and HR exosomes, but not controls, were enriched in specific components of the humoral immune response and leukocyte migration, including the CD53 tetraspanin (Table S2, Figure S4B) which could reflect either biology shared by the twins or changes associated with travel to space; however, analysis of plasma exosome samples from genetically unrelated astronauts would be required to distinguish between these possibilities.

Discussion

Our study focused on cfDNA and exosomes collected during the NASA Twins Study, a longitudinal, multi-omic experiment examining the effects of long-term spaceflight on the human body. In particular, we revealed cf-mtDNA fraction to be a potential new biomarker of physiological stress during prolonged spaceflight, though the total cfDNA concentration is not significantly correlated with spaceflight. We further observed unique exosome and exosomal protein signatures within TW several years after the year-long mission, including an increased amount of exosomes and brain-specific proteins (BAIAP2 and BAIAP2L1). Of note, we identified multiple biases likely caused by AR blood draws from the ISS, including results of tissue of origin deconvolution through nucleosome positioning as well as cfDNA fragment length. As such, future studies will need to control for AR affects if they wish to examine these molecular dynamics. As an example, DNA could be extracted and profiled in space (Castro-Wallace et al., 2017) and either cryopreserved to increase its stable during transport or directly sequenced inflight to minimize biases and obtain results faster (McIntyre et al., 2016, McIntyre et al., 2019).

Interestingly, analysis of plasma exosomes isolated post-return to Earth revealed unique alterations in TW relative to HR and healthy controls, such as a dramatic increase in the number of circulating particles, as well as changes in the types of protein cargo. Since the majority of plasma circulating exosomes are derived from immune cells, it is likely that these alterations reflect immune dysfunction associated with space travel and return to gravity. Specifically, the reduction in TW exosomal immunoglobulin levels and the presence of CD14, a macrophage marker, may signal a shift toward innate immunity, as even short-term chronic exposure to cosmic radiation and microgravity leads to a decrease in adaptive immune cells (Cao et al., 2019; Fernandez-Gonzalo et al., 2017). However, circulating exosomes also reflect systemic changes in homeostasis and physiology, as demonstrated by the packaging of brain-specific proteins in TW which were not seen in control exosomes, which may indicate long-term altered expression of exosomes from the brain after spaceflight. Previous studies had shown that microgravity affects tight junction protein localization within intestinal epithelial cells (Alvarez et al., 2019). It is conceivable that prolonged space travel could exert similar effects on tight junctions within the blood-brain barrier, allowing for more exosomes to enter the peripheral blood.

One remarkable finding of our study is that the 20S proteasome, but not the regulatory 19S proteasome, is found uniquely associated with the plasma-circulating exosomes in the flight subject 3 years post his return to Earth. Recent research has discovered the ubiquitin-independent proteolytic activity of the 20S proteasome and its role as the major degradation machinery under oxidizing conditions (Aiken et al., 2011; Deshmukh et al., 2019; Pickering and Davies, 2012). Elevated levels of 20S proteasome have been detected in the blood plasma from patients with various blood cancers, solid tumors, autoimmune diseases, and other non-malignant diseases (Deshmukh et al., 2019; Sixt and Dahlmann, 2008). It is also reported that active 20S proteasomes within apoptotic exosome-like vesicles can induce autoantibody production and accelerate organ rejection after transplantation (Dieudé et al., 2015), reduce the amount of oligomerized proteins (Schmidt et al., 2020) and reduce tissue damage after myocardial injury (Lai et al., 2012), and are correlated with cancer and other pathological status such as viral infection and vascular injury (Dieudé et al., 2015; Gunasekaran et al., 2020; Tugutova et al., 2019). The elevated circulating exosomal 20S proteasome in the flight subject may reflect the increased physiological need to clear these proteins resulting from long-term blood, immune, or other physiological disorders caused by various stress factors during the flight or return to gravity (Ben-Nissan and Sharon, 2014; Vernice et al., 2020). Study of plasma exosomes obtained from flight subjects at other time points including pre- and inflight will be necessary to further examine whether plasma exosomal proteasome can serve as biomarkers for pathological processes associated with space flight.

Study Limitations and Future Missions

There are limitations in the study design that prevent overly broad conclusions. First, the sample number is too small to control for all types of potential biases and results may be somewhat driven by individual health issues. Second, there is no comparable experimental data to date and the effect of return to gravity in the Soyuz capsule on the integrity of the sampled material is unknown. Third, the exosome samples have been taken post-flight and can only inform about long-term effects of extended spaceflight. However, this study stands as a demonstration of the applications and possibilities of utilizing cfDNA and exosome profiling to monitor astronaut health and can improve the study design of future missions and research (Iosim et al., 2019; Nangle et al., 2020).

Indeed, we identified cf-mtDNA as a novel biomarker of physiological stress during prolonged spaceflight, which is stable even during transport from the ISS. However, we demonstrated that transport-induced biases for cell-type deconvolution from cfDNA needs to be improved in order to be used as a “molecular whole body scan” and/or deployment of more real-time methods (e.g. inflight sequencing). Also, we observed that exosome concentration in plasma and unique exosomal proteins such as 20S proteasomes, CD14, and BAIAP2 demonstrate characteristic changes in the flight subject (TW), potentially caused by physiological stress during prolonged spaceflight. Overall, these data and methods provide novel metrics and data types that can be used in planning for future types of astronaut health monitoring, as well as help establish non-invasive molecular tools for tracking the impact of stress and spaceflight during future missions.

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Further information on methods and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Dr. C. E. Mason (chm2042@med.cornell.edu).

Materials Availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Data and Code Availability

The NASA Life Sciences Data Archive (LSDA) is the repository for all human and animal research data, including that associated with this study. The LSDA has a public facing portal where data requests can be initiated (https://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/Request/dataRequestFAQ). The LSDA team provides the appropriate processes, tools, and secure infrastructure for archival of experimental data and dissemination while complying with applicable rules, regulations, policies, and procedures governing the management and archival of sensitive data and information. The LSDA team enables data and information dissemination to the public or to authorized personnel either by providing public access to information or via an approved request process for information and data from the LSDA in accordance with NASA Human Research Program and JSC Institutional Review Board direction.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jeremy Geddes for providing the artwork for the graphical abstract figure. Furthermore we would like to thank the Epigenomics Core Facility and the Scientific Computing Unit (SCU) at Weill Cornell Medicine, as well as the Starr Cancer Consortium (I9-A9-071) and funding from the Irma T. Hirschl and Monique Weill-Caulier Charitable Trusts, Bert L. & N. Kuggie Vallee Foundation, the WorldQuant Foundation, the Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance, NASA (NNX14AH51G (all Twins Study principal investigators); NNX14AB01G (S.M.B.); and NNX17AB26G (C.E.M.), NNX14AH52G), the National Institutes of Health (R25EB020393, R01NS076465, R01AI125416, R01ES021006, R01AI151059, 1R21AI129851, 1R01MH117406), TRISH (NNX16AO69A:0107, NNX16AO69A:0061, NIH/NCATS KL2-TR-002385), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1151054), and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS) grants (LLS 9238-16, LLS-MCL-982).

Author Contributions

C.E.M., D.B., and D.C.L. conceived the study; D.B., C.M., E.A., S.O., F.A.V., H.Z., I.M., K.G., and P.B. wrote the manuscript; D.B., B.S., F.E.G., D.B.U., D.P.K., K.H.Y., K.N., T.L., V.R., and F.A.V. contributed in sample collection and/or processing; D.B., C.M., S.O., H.Z., I.M., J.F., K.G., and P.B. contributed in bioinformatic and analytic analysis of the study; A.M., B.S., C.E.M., C.M., C.W., E.A., F.E.G., I.V., M.C., M.P.S., R.K.B., S.L., S.O., and T.M. reviewed manuscript and guided interpretation. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Declaration of Interests

S.M.B. is a cofounder and Scientific Advisory Board member of KromaTiD, Inc. C.E.M. is a cofounder and board member for Biotia, Inc. and Onegevity Health, Inc., as well as an advisor or grantee for Abbvie, Inc., ArcBio, Daiichi Sankyo, DNA Genotek, Karius, Inc., and Whole Biome, Inc. D.B. is a cofounder of Poppy Health, Inc. and Analogs Llc.

Published: December 18, 2020

Footnotes

Supplemental Information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101844.

Supplemental Information

Document S1. Transparent Methods and Figures S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Table S1. Peptides Inclusive in TW, HR and Control Exosomes, Related to Figure 6
mmc2.xlsx (14.7KB, xlsx)
Table S2. Lists of Unique Proteins in Exosomes Isolated from the Plasma of (a) TW, (b) HR and (c) Age-Matched Healthy Controls, Related to Figure 6
mmc3.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Aiken C.T., Kaake R.M., Wang X., Huang L. Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011;10 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.006924. R110.006924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez R., Stork C.A., Sayoc-Becerra A., Marchelletta R.R., Prisk G.K., McCole D.F. A simulated microgravity environment causes a sustained defect in epithelial barrier function. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Nissan G., Sharon M. Regulating the 20S proteasome ubiquitin-independent degradation pathway. Biomolecules. 2014;4:862–884. doi: 10.3390/biom4030862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bettegowda C., Sausen M., Leary R.J., Kinde I., Wang Y., Agrawal N., Bartlett B.R., Wang H., Luber B., Alani R.M. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:224ra24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianchi D.W., Parker R.L., Wentworth J., Madankumar R., Saffer C., Das A.F., Craig J.A., Chudova D.I., Devers P.L., Jones K.W. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:799–808. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Birkenkamp-Demtröder K., Nordentoft I., Christensen E., Høyer S., Reinert T., Vang S., Borre M., Agerbæk M., Jensen J.B., Ørntoft T.F. Genomic alterations in liquid biopsies from patients with bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blauwkamp T.A., Thair S., Rosen M.J., Blair L., Lindner M.S., Vilfan I.D., Kawli T., Christians F.C., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Wall G.D. Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:663–674. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burnham P., Dadhania D., Heyang M., Chen F., Westblade L.F., Suthanthiran M., Lee J.R., De Vlaminck I., Vlaminck I. De. Urinary cell-free DNA is a versatile analyte for monitoring infections of the urinary tract. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2412. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04745-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao D., Song J., Ling S., Niu S., Lu L., Cui Z., Li Y., Hao S., Zhong G., Qi Z. Hematopoietic stem cells and lineage cells undergo dynamic alterations under microgravity and recovery conditions. FASEB J. 2019;33:6904–6918. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802421RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro-Wallace S.L., Chiu C.Y., John K.K., Stahl S.E., Rubins K.H., McIntyre A.B.R., Dworkin J.P., Lupisella M.L., Smith D.J., Botkin D.J. Nanopore DNA sequencing and genome assembly on the international space station. Sci. Data. 2017;7:18022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18364-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colombo M., Raposo G., Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;30:255–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Al Amir Dache Z., Otandault A., Tanos R., Pastor B., Meddeb R., Sanchez C., Arena G., Lasorsa L., Bennett A., Grange s. Blood contains circulating cell-free respiratory competent mitochondria. FASEB J. 2020;34:3616–3630. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901917RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deshmukh F.K., Yaffe D., Olshina M.A., Ben-Nissan G., Sharon M. The contribution of the 20s proteasome to proteostasis. Biomolecules. 2019;9:190. doi: 10.3390/biom9050190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Diehl F., Schmidt K., Choti M.A., Romans K., Goodman S., Li M., Thornton K., Agrawal N., Sokoll L., Szabo S.A. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat. Med. 2008;14:985–990. doi: 10.1038/nm.1789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dieudé M., Bell C., Turgeon J., Beillevaire D., Pomerleau L., Yang B., Hamelin K., Qi S., Pallet N., Béland C. The 20S proteasome core, active within apoptotic exosome-like vesicles, induces autoantibody production and accelerates rejection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:318ra200. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac9816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernandez-Gonzalo R., Baatout S., Moreels M. Impact of particle irradiation on the immune system: from the clinic to mars. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:177. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Garrett-Bakelman F.E., Darshi M., Green S.J., Gur R.C., Lin L., Macias B.R., McKenna M.J., Meydan C., Mishra T., Nasrini J. The NASA twins study: a multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science. 2019;364:eaau8650. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gertz M., Chin C.R., Tomoiaga D., MacKay M., Chang C., Butler D., Afshinnekoo E., Bezdan D., Schmidt M.A., Mozsary C. Multi-omic, single-cell, and biochemical profiles of astronauts guide pharmacological strategies for returning to gravity. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108429. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunasekaran M., Bansal S., Ravichandran R., Sharma M., Perincheri S., Rodriguez F., Hachem R., Fisher C.E., Limaye A.P., Omar A. Respiratory viral infection in lung transplantation induces exosomes that trigger chronic rejection. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:379–388. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harmati M., Gyukity-Sebestyen E., Dobra G., Janovak L., Dekany I., Saydam O., Hunyadi-Gulyas E., Nagy I., Farkas A., Pankotai T. Small extracellular vesicles convey the stress-induced adaptive responses of melanoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:15329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51778-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heitzer E., Haque I.S., Roberts C.E.S., Speicher M.R. Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;20:1. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoshino A., Costa-Silva B., Shen T.L., Rodrigues G., Hashimoto A., Tesic Mark M., Molina H., Kohsaka S., Di Giannatale A., Ceder S. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015;527:329–335. doi: 10.1038/nature15756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoshino A., Kim H.S., Bojmar L., Gyan K.E., Cioffi M., Hernandez J., Zambirinis C.P., Rodrigues G., Molina H., Heissel S. Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers define multiple human cancers. Cell. 2020;182:1044–1061.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hummel E.M., Hessas E., Müller S., Beiter T., Fisch M., Eibl A., Wolf O.T., Giebel B., Platen P., Kumsta R. Cell-free DNA release under psychosocial and physical stress conditions. Transl. Psychiatry. 2018;8:236. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0264-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Iosim S., MacKay M., Westover C., Mason C.E. Translating current biomedical therapies for long duration, deep space missions. Precision Clin. Med. 2019;2(4):259–269. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbz022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang C., Pugh B.F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:161–172. doi: 10.1038/nrg2522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang P., Chan C.W.M., Chan K.C.A., Cheng S.H., Wong J., Wong V.W.-S., Wong G.L.H., Chan S.L., Mok T.S.K., Chan H.L.Y. Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2015;112:E1317–E1325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500076112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalluri R., LeBleu V.S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367:eaau6977. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keller S., König A.K., Marmé F., Runz S., Wolterink S., Koensgen D., Mustea A., Sehouli J., Altevogt P. Systemic presence and tumor-growth promoting effect of ovarian carcinoma released exosomes. Cancer Lett. 2009;278:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim M.-S.S., Pinto S.M., Getnet D., Nirujogi R.S., Manda S.S., Chaerkady R., Madugundu A.K., Kelkar D.S., Isserlin R., Jain S. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:575. doi: 10.1038/nature13302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lai R.C., Tan S.S., Teh B.J., Sze S.K., Arslan F., de Kleijn D.P., Choo A., Lim S.K. Proteolytic potential of the MSC exosome proteome: implications for an exosome-mediated delivery of therapeutic proteasome. Int. J. Proteomics. 2012;2012:971907. doi: 10.1155/2012/971907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li L., Hann H.-W., Wan S., Hann R.S., Wang C., Lai Y., Ye X., Evans A., Myers R.E., Ye Z. Cell-free circulating mitochondrial DNA content and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic HBV infection. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23992. doi: 10.1038/srep23992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindqvist D., Fernström J., Grudet C., Ljunggren L., Träskman-Bendz L., Ohlsson L., Westrin Å. Increased plasma levels of circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA in suicide attempters: associations with HPA-axis hyperactivity. Transl. Psychiatry. 2016;6:e971. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lindqvist D., Wolkowitz O.M., Picard M., Ohlsson L., Bersani F.S., Fernström J., Westrin Å., Hough C.M., Lin J., Reus V.I. Circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA, but not leukocyte mitochondrial DNA copy number, is elevated in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:1557–1564. doi: 10.1038/s41386-017-0001-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Luxton J.J., McKenna M.J., Taylor L.E., George K.A., Zwart S.R., Crucian B.E., Drei V.R., Garrett-Bakelman F.E., Mackay M.J., Butler D. Temporal telomere and DNA damage responses in the space radiation environment. Cell Rep. 2020;33(8):108435. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108435. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mathieu M., Martin-Jaular L., Lavieu G., Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:9–17. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McIntyre A.B.R., Rizzardi L., Yu A.M., Alexander N., Rosen G.L., Botkin D.J., Stahl S.S., John K.K., Castro-Wallace S.L., McGrath K. Nanopore sequencing in microgravity. NPJ Microgravity. 2016;2:16035. doi: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McIntyre A.B.R., Alexander N., Grigorev K., Bezdan D., Sichtig H., Chiu C.Y., Mason C.E. Single-molecule sequencing detection of N6-methyladenine in microbial reference materials. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:579. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08289-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mouliere F., Robert B., Peyrotte E., Del Rio M., Ychou M., Molina F., Gongora C., Thierry A.R. High fragmentation characterizes tumour-derived circulating DNA. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Murtaza M., Caldas C. Nucleosome mapping in plasma DNA predicts cancer gene expression. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1105–1106. doi: 10.1038/ng.3686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nangle S.N., Wolfson M.Y., Hartsough L., Ma N., Mason C.E., Merighi M., Nathan V., Silver P.A., Simon M., Swett J. The case for biotechnology on mars. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:401–407. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0485-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Newman A.M., Lovejoy A.F., Klass D.M., Kurtz D.M., Chabon J.J., Scherer F., Stehr H., Liu C., Bratman S.V., Say C. Integrated digital error suppression for improved detection of circulating tumor DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016;34:547–555. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Neill C.P., Gilligan K.E., Dwyer R.M. Role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in cell stress response and resistance to cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:136. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pickering A.M., Davies K.J.A. Degradation of damaged proteins: the main function of the 20S proteasome. In: Grune T., editor. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Elsevier B.V.; 2012. pp. 227–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Qin Y., Long L., Huang Q. Extracellular vesicles in toxicological studies: key roles in communication between environmental stress and adverse outcomes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2020;40:1166–1182. doi: 10.1002/jat.3963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt M.A., Iosim S., Schmidt C.M., Afshinnekoo E., Mason C.E. The NASA twins study: the effect of one year in space on the genome and molecular phenotype of long-chain fatty acid desaturases and elongases. Lifestyle Genomics. 2020;1:1–15. doi: 10.1159/000506769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shen S.Y., Singhania R., Fehringer G., Chakravarthy A., Roehrl M.H.A., Chadwick D., Zuzarte P.C., Borgida A., Wang T.T., Li T. Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes. Nature. 2018;563:579–583. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0703-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Siravegna G., Marsoni S., Siena S., Bardelli A. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:531. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sixt S.U., Dahlmann B. Extracellular, circulating proteasomes and ubiquitin - Incidence and relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2008;1782:817–823. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Snyder M.W., Kircher M., Hill A.J., Daza R.M., Shendure J. Cell-free DNA comprises an in vivo nucleosome footprint that informs its tissues-of-origin. Cell. 2016;164:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Song X., Hu W., Yu H., Wang H., Zhao Y., Korngold R., Zhao Y. Existence of circulating mitochondria in human and animal peripheral blood. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(6):2122. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Théry C., Boussac M., Véron P., Ricciardi-Castagnoli P., Raposo G., Garin J., Amigorena S. Proteomic analysis of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a secreted subcellular compartment distinct from apoptotic vesicles. J. Immunol. 2001;166:7309–7318. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Thierry A.R., El Messaoudi S., Gahan P.B., Anker P., Stroun M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35:347–376. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9629-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tugutova E.A., Tamkovich S.N., Patysheva M.R., Afanas’ev S.G., Tsydenova A.A., Grigor’eva A.E., Kolegova E.S., Kondakova I.V., Yunusova N.V. Relation between tetraspanin- associated and tetraspanin- non- associated exosomal proteases and metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019;20:809–815. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ulz P., Thallinger G.G., Auer M., Graf R., Kashofer K., Jahn S.W., Abete L., Pristauz G., Petru E., Geigl J.B. Inferring expressed genes by whole-genome sequencing of plasma DNA. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1273–1278. doi: 10.1038/ng.3648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Underhill H.R., Kitzman J.O., Hellwig S., Welker N.C., Daza R., Baker D.N., Gligorich K.M., Rostomily R.C., Bronner M.P., Shendure J. Fragment length of circulating tumor DNA. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Valadi H., Ekström K., Bossios A., Sjöstrand M., Lee J.J., Lötvall J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Verhoeven J., Boer K., Van Schaik R.H.N., Manintveld O.C., Huibers M.M.H., Baan C.C., Hesselink D.A. Liquid biopsies to monitor solid organ transplant function: a review of new biomarkers. Ther. Drug Monit. 2018;40:515–525. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. De Vlaminck I., Khush K.K., Strehl C., Kohli B., Luikart H., Neff N.F., Okamoto J., Snyder T.M., Cornfield D.N., Nicolls M.R. Temporal response of the human virome to immunosuppression and antiviral therapy. Cell. 2013;155:1178–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. De Vlaminck I., Valantine H.A., Snyder T.M., Strehl C., Cohen G., Luikart H., Neff N.F., Okamoto J., Bernstein D., Weisshaar D. Circulating cell-free DNA enables noninvasive diagnosis of heart transplant rejection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:241ra77. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vernice N.A., Meydan C., Afshinnekoo E., Mason C.E. Long-term spaceflight and the cardiovascular system. Precision Clin. Med. 2020;109:pbaa022. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Volik S., Alcaide M., Morin R.D., Collins C. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA): clinical significance and utility in cancer shaped by emerging technologies. Mol. Cancer Res. 2016;14:898–908. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wan J.C.M.M., Heider K., Gale D., Murphy S., Fisher E., Mouliere F., Ruiz-Valdepenas A., Santonja A., Morris J., Chandrananda D. ctDNA monitoring using patient-specific sequencing and integration of variant reads. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020;12:eaaz8084. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang Y.K., Bashashati A., Anglesio M.S., Cochrane D.R., Grewal D.S., Ha G., McPherson A., Horlings H.M., Senz J., Prentice L.M. Genomic consequences of aberrant DNA repair mechanisms stratify ovarian cancer histotypes. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:856–865. doi: 10.1038/ng.3849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Williams D., Kuipers A., Mukai C., Thirsk R. Acclimation during space flight: effects on human physiology. CMAJ. 2009;180:1317–1323. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wortzel I., Dror S., Kenific C.M., Lyden D. Exosome-mediated metastasis: communication from a distance. Dev. Cell. 2019;49:347–360. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yoshioka Y., Kosaka N., Konishi Y., Ohta H., Okamoto H., Sonoda H., Nonaka R., Yamamoto H., Ishii H., Mori M. Ultra-sensitive liquid biopsy of circulating extracellular vesicles using ExoScreen. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3591. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang J., Li J., Saucier J.B., Feng Y., Jiang Y., Sinson J., McCombs A.K., Schmitt E.S., Peacock S., Chen S. Non-invasive prenatal sequencing for multiple Mendelian monogenic disorders using circulating cell-free fetal DNA. Nat. Med. 2019;25:439–447. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0334-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhou Y., Zhou B., Pache L., Chang M., Khodabakhshi A.H., Tanaseichuk O., Benner C., Chanda S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zwirner K., Hilke F.J., Demidov G., Ossowski S., Gani C., Rieß O., Zips D., Welz S., Schroeder C. Circulating cell-free DNA: a potential biomarker to differentiate inflammation and infection during radiochemotherapy. Radiother. Oncol. 2018;129:575–581. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Transparent Methods and Figures S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Table S1. Peptides Inclusive in TW, HR and Control Exosomes, Related to Figure 6
mmc2.xlsx (14.7KB, xlsx)
Table S2. Lists of Unique Proteins in Exosomes Isolated from the Plasma of (a) TW, (b) HR and (c) Age-Matched Healthy Controls, Related to Figure 6
mmc3.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The NASA Life Sciences Data Archive (LSDA) is the repository for all human and animal research data, including that associated with this study. The LSDA has a public facing portal where data requests can be initiated (https://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/Request/dataRequestFAQ). The LSDA team provides the appropriate processes, tools, and secure infrastructure for archival of experimental data and dissemination while complying with applicable rules, regulations, policies, and procedures governing the management and archival of sensitive data and information. The LSDA team enables data and information dissemination to the public or to authorized personnel either by providing public access to information or via an approved request process for information and data from the LSDA in accordance with NASA Human Research Program and JSC Institutional Review Board direction.


Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES