Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Sep 28;59(49):21930–21934. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009115

A Next‐Generation Air‐Stable Palladium(I) Dimer Enables Olefin Migration and Selective C−C Coupling in Air

Gourab Kundu 1, Theresa Sperger 1, Kari Rissanen 2, Franziska Schoenebeck 1,
PMCID: PMC7756449  PMID: 32810335

Abstract

We report a new air‐stable PdI dimer, [Pd(μ‐I)(PCy2 tBu)]2, which triggers E‐selective olefin migration to enamides and styrene derivatives in the presence of multiple functional groups and with complete tolerance of air. The same dimer also triggers extremely rapid C−C coupling (alkylation and arylation) at room temperature in a modular and triply selective fashion of aromatic C−Br, C−OTf/OFs, and C−Cl bonds in poly(pseudo)halogenated arenes, displaying superior activity over previous PdI dimer generations for substrates that bear substituents ortho to C−OTf.

Keywords: homogeneous catalysis, C−C coupling, chemoselectivity, olefin migration, palladium


A novel air‐stable PdI dimer is reported that triggers E‐selective olefin migration to enamides and styrene derivatives in the presence of multiple functional groups and with complete tolerance of air. The same dimer also triggers extremely rapid C−C coupling (alkylation and arylation) at room temperature in a modular and triply selective fashion.

graphic file with name ANIE-59-21930-g005.jpg


Metal catalyzed cross‐coupling reactions to forge C−C bonds [1] as well as olefin migrations[ 2 , 3 ] for the construction of stereochemically defined double bonds are central strategies in the synthesis of key building blocks, pharmaceuticals, materials as well as of societal and industrial relevance, for example, in the production of commodity chemicals, such as gasoline, nylon, detergents, cosmetics, fragrances or food additives. [4] A central challenge in this context is the control of selectivity: whereas the site‐selective C−C bond formation of poly(pseudo)halogenated arenes is a powerful strategy to densely functionalized arenes, [5] the positional as well as geometrical control (E vs. Z) of an olefin is key for its properties as well as follow up transformations.[ 2 , 6 ]

PdI dimers have emerged as especially powerful catalysts for these challenges. [7] Their catalytic role ranges from engaging in dinuclear PdI catalysis [8] to being precursors for Pd0 in C−C and C‐heteroatom bond formations[ 7b , 9 ] or for PdII‐H in olefin isomerizations. [10] Ultimately, the properties, catalytic role and efficiency are dictated by the nature of the ligand and the bridging unit in the dinuclear PdI entity. For example, the bromide‐bridged [Pd(μ‐Br)(PtBu3)]2 dimer D1[ 9g , 9h , 11 ] (Figure 1) is highly labile and as such readily transformed to Pd0 by weak nucleophiles. [12] It is also highly sensitive to oxygen or coordinating solvents,[ 7b , 13 ] and therefore does not allow cross‐coupling in air. A small modification, that is, swap of bromide to iodide in the bridge, makes the PdI dimer highly robust: iodide‐bridged dimer D2, that is, [Pd(μ‐I)(PtBu3)]2, is a bench‐stable species and no longer an efficient pre‐catalyst to Pd0; it needs strong nucleophiles for its conversion to Pd0. [12] However, nucleophiles which also function as an effective bridge in the dinuclear entity, can be incorporated into arenes via an exchange under direct dinuclear PdI catalysis. [8] Moreover, D2 triggers extremely rapid and fully selective, sequential C−C bond formations (both arylation and alkylation) of aromatic C−Br, C−OTf/OFs and C−Cl bonds under open flask conditions (Figure 1). [14] Conversely, owing to its robustness, dimer D2 is ineffective in olefin isomerization (see below), which requires an initial intramolecular palladation [10] with the ligand for PdII‐H generation. The more labile and air‐sensitive bromide‐bridged PdI species D1 is therefore to date the most effective PdI dimer precursor for olefin isomerizations, as demonstrated by Gooßen. [10] A less precious NiI dimer was recently shown to also engage in selective olefin migration, albeit under Ni‐radical rather than Ni‐H reactivity. [6] Skrydstrup demonstrated that the in situ generated [(PtBu3)2PdII(H)(Cl)] also triggers effective olefin isomerization. [15]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Reactivity and properties of current PtBu3Pd(I) dimer generations versus this work.

As part of our ongoing program with dinuclear metal catalysts,[ 7 , 9g , 9h , 13 , 14 ] we questioned whether a hybrid version of the dimers D1 and D2 could potentially be created, which would combine the practical air‐stability feature of D2 with the reactivity modes of D1 and D2 to ultimately enable rapid and selective cross‐coupling reactions as well as olefin migrations under complete tolerance of air.

We focused especially on the E‐selective generation of enamides, which owing to their exquisite reactivity and stability features make them tuneable enamine equivalents for a wide variety of transformations. [16] Double bond migrations to make fully N‐substituted and acyclic enamides are currently largely limited to precious metals however, that is, Ru, Rh and Ir catalysis. [17] Only isolated examples have been reported for other metals, [18] and identification of a Pd‐based methodology would therefore be valuable, especially if paired with air‐tolerance.

We envisioned that a new generation of air‐stable PdI dimers for olefin isomerization ideally also bears the iodide bridges, which appear to be key for air stability, but then should be combined with a slightly less stabilizing ligand to also allow for intramolecular cyclopalladation and [PdII‐H] generation. We wondered whether a partial replacement of tert‐butyl by cyclohexyl [19] would be possible and potentially lead to the desired features. Such a PdI dimer is unknown. We therefore initially set out to synthesize the corresponding Pd0 complex, i.e. Pd(PCy2 tBu)2 which was found to have a characteristic 31P‐NMR spectroscopic signal at 54.1 ppm. We subsequently attempted a comproportionation of the Pd0 complex with PdIII2, which resulted in a new species.1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectroscopic analyses (signal at 79.2 ppm in 31P NMR) as well as X‐ray diffraction (see Figure 2) unambiguously confirmed that the novel dimer [Pd(μ‐I)(PCy2 tBu)]2(D3) was generated in high yield (89 %). [20]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

X‐ray structure of new dimer D3; systematic comparison of catalyst performance and mechanistic deuteration data.

Our assessment of its air stability indicated that it is bench stable as a solid for at least three months (which constitutes the time of our testing).

With a new generation of air‐stable PdI dimer D3 in hand, we subsequently investigated its reactivity in the isomerization of substrate 14 a (see Figure 2 A). To our delight, quantitative isomerization of 14 a to E‐enamide 14 occurred in MeOH under open‐flask conditions in 2 h at 50 °C. [21] By contrast, [Pd(μ‐I)(PtBu3)]2 D2 gave only 10 % conversion in MeOH (and 3 % in toluene) even after 7 h at 50 °C. The more labile Br‐bridged D1 gave no conversion whatsoever under open‐flask conditions due to its oxygen‐sensitivity, but effectively yielded 14 under argon. Similarly, Skrydstrup's PdII‐H system C2 [15] that is generated in situ from a mixture of Pd2(dba)3, isobutyryl chloride, and tri‐tert‐butylphosphine (C1) was effective under argon, but not when the reaction was set‐up and performed in air.

Given the great promise of the newly identified air‐stable dimer D3 to trigger double bond migrations without the need for inert conditions, we set out to investigate the wider scope. We tested the isomerization of a variety of alternative tertiary amides (see Figure 3). Simple subjection of D3 to the amides in MeOH for 2 h at 50 °C under open flask conditions yielded the corresponding enamides in excellent yields (>95 %) and high E‐selectivity, regardless of the electronic or steric bias imposed by the substrate. Aromatic (116, 25), aliphatic (1720, 3235) as well as heterocyclic amides (2124) were equally efficient. Potentially coordinating or frequently reactive functional groups, such as OMe, NMe2, CN or halides I, Br, Cl (4, 10, 11) did not impede the transformation. Similarly, valuable fluorinated motifs, such as CF3 or CH2CF3 were well tolerated as substituents either on the aromatic ring or on the amide nitrogen. N‐benzyl and ethyl substituents were also effective. Notably, the isomerization was equally efficient and selective for allyl sulfonamides (2629) and phosphamides (30, 31). The stereochemical integrity of a variety of amino acid derived amides was also fully retained, yielding chiral amides 3235 in excellent yield and selectivity.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Scope of E‐selective olefin migration enabled by new PdI dimer D3 in air. Reaction conditions: D3 (5 μmol), terminal olefin (0.2 mmol), MeOH (1.0 mL), 50 °C, 2 h. Yields of isolated products after chromatography, E/Z ratios were determined by GC‐MS or quantitative 1H NMR. [25]

The open‐flask isomerization process is also amenable to scale‐up: when we performed the reaction on 1 gram scale we isolated enamide 14 in 96 % yield with E/Z>99:1 after simple filtration and solvent removal as purification.

We next set out to test the wider potential of catalyst D3 in isomerizations other than amide to enamide conversions. Pleasingly, D3 was just as powerful for all‐carbon‐based olefin transpositions and we successfully converted a number of allyl benzenes. Electron‐rich as well as electron‐poor substituents were tolerated, including OH groups, even if positioned ortho to the isomerization site (40).[ 22 , 23 ]

Our preliminary mechanistic data on the nature of the active species indicated a palladium hydride to be likely. While we found that dimer D3 is of low solubility in MeOH, in the presence of a substrate in MeOH, we were able to detect two species by 31P‐NMR analysis during the course of the reaction, which likely correspond to a [PdII‐H] (63.8 ppm) and a cyclopalladated Pd species (−9.9 ppm). Analogous species were previously seen in isomerizations with D1. [10] Interestingly, when we performed the one‐pot simultaneous isomerization of 52, 44 a with D3 in MeOH (see Figure 2 B), we only saw very little deuterium scrambling in the products 53, 44 b. Roughly 8 % deuterium content was detected in 44 b, which indicates that the monophosphine PdII‐H appears to stay largely coordinated to the substrate during the course of the isomerization.

Moreover, when we performed the isomerization of allyl benzene 44 a in deuterated methanol (CD3OD), we observed only very little D incorporation in the substrate (<5 %, Figure 2 C). This suggests that the L1Pd(II)(H)(X) [L=PCy2 tBu] that is initially formed via cyclopalladation barely undergoes exchange with the solvent. By contrast, when we separately synthesized the corresponding bisphosphine complexes L2PdII(H)(Cl) [L=PCy2 tBu and PtBu3] [24] C2 and C3 and subjected these species to the isomerization of 44 a in CD3OD, substantial deuteration in the product was observed. For L=PtBu3, 95 % of deuterium content was detected in 44 c, whereas 50 % deuteration was seen for L=PCy2 tBu. These data indicate that the ligation state of the palladium hydride substantially affects the deuterium scrambling and intermolecular cross‐overs. PdI dimers are in this respect privileged in forming monophosphine [PdII‐H] directly.

Overall, these data showcase that double bond migrations are feasible in open air for a range of substrates and substitution patterns, which was previously not possible with the first generation air‐stable PdI dimer D2.

We previously showed that dimer D2 gives rise to extremely rapid and fully selective arylation and alkylation of aromatic C−Br bonds in the presence of C−OTf and C−Cl.[ 14a , 14h , 14i ] As opposed to typical Pd0 based transformations, the selectivity was independent of any steric or electronic impacts imposed by the substrates. Even if challenged with an adamantyl group ortho to C−Br, the coupling still occurs there in favour over a less hindered C−OTf site. [14a] Our data indicated that while PdI can in principle directly add to C−I or C−Br bonds, the barriers for addition to C−Cl or C−OTf are too high. However, we found that use of a polar solvent along with an organometallic reagent allows for C−OTf functionalization with D2 in air in less than 10 min (at r.t.), [14d] which is most likely due to an ate complex having been generated which then triggers the transformation. While we found C‐OTf functionalization to be quite broad, it occasionally proceeded inefficiently when there was ortho substitution to the coupling site (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Site selective C−C coupling of poly(pseudo)halogenated arenes and ortho‐challenge for C‐OTf derivatization. Reaction conditions: D3 (5 μmol), substrate (0.2 mmol), RZnCl (1.2–2.0 equiv) NMP (1.0 mL), r.t. Conversions as determined by GC‐MS are shown, yields of isolated product are given in parentheses. [25]

We were intrigued whether D3 can also trigger site‐selective C−C bond formations, especially if sterically challenged. Figure 4 shows the results. The data indicate that dimer D3 can also trigger selective Csp2 ‐Csp3 as well as Csp2 ‐Csp2 couplings of C‐OTf in NMP under open‐flask conditions in less than 10 min at r.t. Interestingly, while D2 yielded poor conversion for the hindered 45 and 47 in <20 %, the new dimer D3 gave excellent conversion and exclusive C‐OTf selectivity. For comparison, bromide‐bridged D1 also gives poor (<20 %) conversion when subjected to the same transformations under argon (in air the dimer is deactivated prior to reaction). For the functionalization of the analogous fluorosulfate C‐OSO2F (OFs) in the presence of C−Cl, [14b] D1 gave no selectivity, whereas D2 and D3 gave fully selective couplings in excellent yields. Moreover, in analogy to D2, [14d] the new generation D3 appears to be similarly effective in C−Br and C−Cl couplings under the analogous reaction conditions, which allows for the triply selective and modular functionalization of arenes also.

In conclusion, disclosed herein was the preparation and reactivity studies of a new generation of air‐stable PdI dimer. The newly developed [Pd(μ‐I)(PCy2 tBu)]2 D3 allowed for the first efficient E‐selective olefin migrations in air in just 2 h reaction time to generate E‐enamides or styrene derivatives in the presence of various functionalities, including sulfones, (phosph)amides, aldehydes, ester, stereocenters, and even tolerating the frequently reactive aromatic C−I bonds or ortho‐OH groups. Our mechanistic data indicate that barely any H/D‐crossover and exchange takes place, which likely is due to a monophosphine [PdII‐H] being generated as active species. Dimer D3 was shown to also trigger rapid and chemoselective Csp2 ‐Csp2 as well as Csp2 ‐Csp3 cross coupling reactions of poly(pseudo)halogenated arenes in air, showing superior reactivity compared to previous dimer generations for triflate substrates that contain ortho substituents.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

We thank the European Research Council (ERC‐864849) for funding. Open access funding was enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

G. Kundu, T. Sperger, K. Rissanen, F. Schoenebeck, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 21930.

Contributor Information

Gourab Kundu, http://www.schoenebeck.oc.rwth‐aachen.de.

Prof. Dr. Franziska Schoenebeck, Email: franziska.schoenebeck@rwth-aachen.de.

References

  • 1. 
  • 1a. Transition Metal-Catalyzed Couplings in Process Chemistry: Case Studies From the Pharmaceutical Industry (Eds.: Magano J., Dunetz J. R.), Wiley, Hoboken, 2013; [Google Scholar]
  • 1b. New Trends in CrossCoupling: Theory and Applications (Ed.: Colacot T.), RSC Catalysis Series, Cambridge, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For reviews, see:
  • 2a. Massad I., Marek I., ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 5793; [Google Scholar]
  • 2b. Vasseur A., Bruffaerts J., Marek I., Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 209; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2c. Hassam M., Taher A., Arnott G. E., Green I. R., van Otterlo W. A. L., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 5462; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2d. Hilt G., ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2484; [Google Scholar]
  • 2e. Larionov E., Li H., Mazet C., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Johnson L. K., Killian C. M., Brookhart M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6414. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Larsen C. R., Grotjahn D. B. in Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds: A Comprehensive Handbook in Four Volumes, 3rd ed. (Eds.: Cornils B., Herrmann W. A., Beller M., Paciello R.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2017, pp. 1365–1378. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For reviews,see:
  • 5a. Almond-Thynne J., Blakemore D. C., Pryde D. C., Spivey A. C., Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 40; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5b. Fairlamb I. J. S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1036; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5c. Schröter S., Stock C., Bach T., Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2245. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kapat A., Sperger T., Guven S., Schoenebeck F., Science 2019, 363, 391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For reviews, see:
  • 7a. Christmann U., Vilar R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 366—374; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7b. Colacot T. J., Platinum Met. Rev. 2009, 53, 183; [Google Scholar]
  • 7c. Paton R. S., Brown J. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10448; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 10598; [Google Scholar]
  • 7d. Inatomi T., Koga Y., Matsubara K., Molecules 2018, 23, 140; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7e. Shaughnessy K. H., Isr. J. Chem. 2020, 60, 180; [Google Scholar]
  • 7f. Xu W., Li M., Qiao L., Xie J., Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 8524–8536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. 
  • 8a. Bonney K. J., Proutiere F., Schoenebeck F., Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 4434; [Google Scholar]
  • 8b. Yin G., Kalvet I., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6809; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6913; [Google Scholar]
  • 8c. Aufiero M., Sperger T., Tsang A. S.-K., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10322; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 10462; [Google Scholar]
  • 8d. Chen X.-Y., Pu M.-P., Cheng H.-G., Sperger T., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11395; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 11517. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.For examples, see:
  • 9a. Hruszkewycz D. P., Balcells D., Guard L. M., Hazari N., Tilset M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7300; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9b. Jimeno C., Christmann U., Escudero-Adan E. C., Vilar R., Pericas M. A., Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16510; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9c. Murahashi T., Takase K., Oka M.-a., Ogoshi S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14908; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9d. Hill L. L., Crowell J. L., Tutwiler S. L., Massie N. L., Hines C. C., Griffin S. T., Rogers R. D., Shaughnessy K. H., Grasa G. A., Seechurn C. C. C. J., Li H., Colacot T. J., Chou J., Woltermann C. J., J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 6477; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9e. Bercot E. A., Caille S., Bostick T. M., Ranganathan K., Jensen R., Faul M. M., Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5251; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9f. Christmann U., Pantazis D. A., Benet-Buchholz J., McGrady J. E., Maseras F., Vilar R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6376; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9g. Stambuli J. P., Kuwano R., Hartwig J. F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4746; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4940; [Google Scholar]
  • 9h. Prashad M., Mak X. Y., Liu Y., Repič O., J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. 
  • 10a. Mamone P., Grünberg M. F., Fromm A., Khan B. A., Gooßen L. J., Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3716; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10b. Ohlmann D. M., Tschauder N., Stockis J.-P., Gooßen K., Dierker M., Gooßen L. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13716; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10c. De S., Sivendran N., Maity B., Pirkl N., Koley D., Gooßen L. J., ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4517. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Vilar R., Mingos D. M. P., Cardin C. J., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1996, 4313. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aufiero M., Scattolin T., Proutière F., Schoenebeck F., Organometallics 2015, 34, 5191. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Durà-Vilà V., Mingos D. M. P., Vilar R., White A. J. P., Williams D. J., Chem. Commun. 2000, 1525. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. 
  • 14a. Kalvet I., Deckers K., Funes-Ardoiz I., Magnin G., Sperger T., Kremer M., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7721; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14b. Mendel M., Kalvet I., Hupperich D., Magnin G., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2115; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 2132; [Google Scholar]
  • 14c. Magnin G., Clifton J., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 10179; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 10285; [Google Scholar]
  • 14d. Keaveney S. T., Kundu G., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12573; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 12753; [Google Scholar]
  • 14e. Scattolin T., Senol E., Yin G., Guo Q., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12425; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 12605; [Google Scholar]
  • 14f. Sperger T., Schoenebeck F., Synthesis 2018, 50, 4471; [Google Scholar]
  • 14g. Dürr A. B., Fisher H. C., Kalvet I., Truong K.-N., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13431; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 13616; [Google Scholar]
  • 14h. Kalvet I., Sperger T., Scattolin T., Magnin G., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7078; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 7184; [Google Scholar]
  • 14i. Kalvet I., Magnin G., Schoenebeck F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1581; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 1603; [Google Scholar]
  • 14j. Sperger T., Stirner C. K., Schoenebeck F., Synthesis 2017, 49, 115. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gauthier D., Lindhardt A. T., Olsen E. P. K., Overgaard J., Skrydstrup T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. 
  • 16a. Matsubara R., Kobayashi S., Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 292; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16b. Carbery D. R., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3455; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16c. Gopalaiah K., Kagan H. B., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 4599; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16d. Xie J.-H., Zhu S.-F., Zhou Q.-L., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1713; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16e. Courant T., Dagousset G., Masson G., Synthesis 2015, 47, 1799. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.For a review, see:
  • 17a. Krompiec S., Krompiec M., Penczek R., Ignasiak H., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1819; for examples, see: [Google Scholar]
  • 17b. Trost B. M., Cregg J. J., Quach N., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5133; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17c. Bujak P., Krompiec S., Malarz J., Krompiec M., Filapek M., Danikiewicz W., Kania M., Gębarowska K., Grudzka I., Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 5972; [Google Scholar]
  • 17d. Alcaide B., Almendros P., Alonso J. M., Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2874; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17e. Krompiec S., Pigulla M., Krompiec M., Baj S., Mrowiec-Białoń J., Kasperczyk J., Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5257; [Google Scholar]
  • 17f. Neugnot B., Cintrat J.-C., Rousseau B., Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3575; [Google Scholar]
  • 17g. Krompiec S., Pigulla M., Szczepankiewicz W., Bieg T., Kuznik N., Leszczynska-Sejda K., Kubicki M., Borowiak T., Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7095. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.For examples using Ni-catalysis, see:
  • 18a. Wang L., Liu C., Bai R., Pan Y., Lei A., Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7923; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18b. Weber F., Steinlandt P. S., Ballmann M., Hilt G., Synthesis 2017, 49, 440 (cyclic only); for examples using Pd-catalysis, see: Ref. [10a] (cyclic only) and Ref. [15]. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Proutiere F., Lyngvi E., Aufiero M., Sanhueza I. A., Schoenebeck F., Organometallics 2014, 33, 6879. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Selected X-ray data for D3: C32H62I2P2Pd2, M r=975.35, triclinic; space group P1 , a=8.0594(4), b=10.6219(6), c=11.7927(5) Å, β=86.775(4)°, V=914.13(9) Å3, Z=1, T=296(2) K; 29 077 reflections measured (3.538≤2θ≤49.992), 3216 unique (R int=0.1274, R sigma=0.0457) which were used in all calculations. The final R 1 was 0.0708 [I>2σ(I)] and wR 2 was 0.1565. Deposition Number 2008108 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
  • 21.The reaction was equally efficient in MeOH under exclusion of oxygen (argon). Other solvents proved less optimal: using the same reaction time and temperature there was 50 % conversion in diglyme, 30 % in 1,4-dioxane or DME, 20 % in water or 10 % in toluene.
  • 22.Moreover, a mixture of 1 and 44 led to full isomerization to the corresponding products in the same pot.
  • 23.Subjection of these conditions to 3-(allyloxy)-4-methoxy-benzaldehyde gave rise to a 60:40 E/Z mixture of 4-methoxy-3-(prop-1-en-1-yloxy)benzaldehyde.
  • 24.L2PdII(H)(Cl) is made by subjection of L2Pd0 to HCl. For details see Supporting Information.
  • 25.For details, please refer to the Supporting Information.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES