Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Sep 22;75(12):3027–3038. doi: 10.1111/all.14579

Advances and novel developments in molecular allergology

Öykü Üzülmez 1, Tanja Kalic 1, Heimo Breiteneder 1,
PMCID: PMC7756543  PMID: 32882057

Abstract

The continuous search for new allergens and the design of allergen derivatives improves the understanding of their allergenicity and aids the design of novel diagnostic and immunotherapy approaches. This article discusses the recent developments in allergen and epitope discovery, allergy diagnostics and immunotherapy. Structural information is crucial for the elucidation of cross‐reactivity of marker allergens such as the walnut Jug r 6 or that of nonhomologous allergens, as shown for the peanut allergens Ara h 1 and 2. High‐throughput sequencing, liposomal nanoallergen display, bead‐based assays, and protein chimeras have been used in epitope discovery. The binding of natural ligands by the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 or the mold allergen Alt a 1 increased the stability of these allergens, which is directly linked to their allergenicity. We also report recent findings on the use of component‐resolved approaches, basophil activation test, and novel technologies for improvement of diagnostics. New strategies in allergen‐specific immunotherapy have also emerged, such as the use of virus‐like particles, biologics or novel adjuvants. The identification of dectin‐1 as a key player in allergy to tropomyosins and the formyl peptide receptor 3 in allergy to lipocalins are outstanding examples of research into the mechanism of allergic sensitization.

Keywords: allergen immunotherapy, biomarkers in allergy, hypoallergens, marker allergens, mechanisms of allergic sensitization


Abbreviations

Ab

antibody

AIT

allergen‐specific immunotherapy

BAT

basophil activation test

CCD

cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants

CD

cluster of differentiation

CLV

clavulanic acid

CRD

component‐resolved diagnosis

CS

corticostreoid

DC

dendritic cell

EAACI

European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

FcεRI

high‐affinity IgE Fc receptor

FeNO

fractional exhaled nitric oxide

FPR

formyl peptide receptor

HDM

house dust mite

HTP

high‐throughput

Ig

Immunoglobulin

IGFALS

insulin‐like growth factor binding protein, acid labile subunit

IL

interleukin

ILCreg

regulatory innate lymphoid cells

IUIS

International Union of Immunological Societies

LPA

Luminex peptide assay

mAb

monoclonal antibody

MALDI‐MS

matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry

miBAT

microfluidic immuno‐affinity basophil activation test

NFA

nanofluidic assay

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

NPT

nasal provocation test

nsLTP

nonspecific lipid transfer protein

OFC

oral food challenge

PBMC

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PDV

Polistes dominula venom

PTM

post‐translational modifications

RNA

ribonucleic acid

ScFv

single‐chain variable fragment

sFcεRI

soluble isoform of high‐affinity IgE Fc receptor

sIgE

specific IgE

SLIT

sublingual immunotherapy

SPT

skin prick test

TADM

triacedimannose

TSLP

thymic stromal lymphopoietin

TUP

target‐unrelated peptide

VH

heavy chain variable

VLP

virus‐like particle

WHO

World Health Organization

α‐Gal

galactose‐α‐1,3‐galactose

1. INTRODUCTION

New technologies are changing the way research is performed in many areas of molecular allergology. 1 Recombinant (r) allergens have influenced the development of allergy diagnosis and allergen‐specific immunotherapy (AIT) for over three decades. 2 Although the gold rush of allergen discovery is over, gaps in our knowledge of structures, cross‐reactivities, and conformational epitopes are being constantly filled. 2 , 3 Precision medicine in allergology requires the identification of genes and biomarkers for diagnosis or monitoring of treatment efficacy. 4 Such novel discoveries should be discussed, and their merits and demerits be evaluated as the research progresses. As clinical trials for the evaluation of treatment options of allergic diseases are becoming more important, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is actively involved in harmonizing and validating AIT study designs. 5 Besides, the treatment of allergic diseases with biologics 6 or small molecules 7 is gaining importance. Here, we review recent advances in allergen discovery, diagnostic approaches, AIT strategies, biomarkers of allergic diseases, and mechanisms leading to allergic sensitization including an evaluation on their clinical relevance (Box 1).

Box 1. Important recent discoveries in molecular allergology (♦ of clinical relevance).

Discoveries about allergen cross‐reactivity

  • The walnut allergen Jug r 6 is a marker allergen for clinical cross‐reactivity between walnut, hazelnut, pistachio, and sesame.♦

  • Fish alpha‐parvalbumins from cartilaginous fish are hypoallergenic unlike beta‐parvalbumins from bony fish indicating a dietary alternative for patients.♦

  • Venom allergens of neotropical wasps are CCD‐free, and hence, extracts of their venoms allow reliable diagnosis, unlike venom extracts from other hymenoptera species.♦

Novel technologies for the identification of linear and conformational IgE epitopes

  • Linear peptides of the peanut allergen Ara h 2 were displayed on liposome nanoparticles to elucidate patient‐specific contribution of each epitope to IgE cross‐linking.

  • Bead‐based assays displaying allergen‐derived sequential epitopes are sensitive and HTP tools to diagnose milk or peanut allergy.

  • Chimeras based on allergen homologues or on allergens were used for mapping of conformational epitopes.

Discoveries in the field of allergen sensitization

  • The food matrix contributes to the sensitization in peanut and fish allergy.♦

  • A genetic predisposition for allergy to tropomyosin is caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism in the dectin‐1 gene.

Novel technologies for AIT

  • Use of virus‐like particles to deliver allergens as a possible AIT strategy for peanut or HDM allergy.

2. ALLERGEN MOLECULES

Continuous identification and characterization of novel allergens is required for understanding the mechanisms of allergic sensitization, improving diagnostics and developing immunotherapy strategies. 1

2.1. Identification of new allergens and allergenic determinants

Several novel allergens were recently accepted by the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Sub‐Committee. An allergenic glutathione S‐transferase, Per a 5.0101, was extracted from the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) and its immunodominant IgE epitopes were predicted using in silico approaches. 8 Unlike the German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergens Bla g 1 and 2, which are predominantly found in fecal extracts, Bla g 6, 9, and 11 are present in the whole body, and are now also recognized as major allergens. 9 Par h 1, a pollen defensin‐like protein, was discovered from the feverfew weed (Parthenium hysterophorus), a so far overlooked allergen source that causes pollen‐induced allergic rhinitis. 10 Among foods, a novel vicilin, Jug r 6, was identified from the English walnut (Juglans regia). 11 The low reactivity to cartilaginous fish due to their α‐parvalbumin content indicated dietary alternatives for patients sensitized to β‐parvalbumins, major allergens of bony fish. 12

The European paper wasp (Polistes dominula) is gaining importance in venom allergy research due to its invasive nature. Perez‐Riverol et al reported the absence of cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD), which are a common cause of false‐positive results in venom allergy diagnosis of Polistes species. 13 Until recently, only Pol d 5 from P dominula venom (PDV) was commercially available for component‐resolved diagnosis (CRD). 14 A dipeptidyl peptidase IV, Pol d 3, was identified as another major allergen in PDV. 15

Resistance to β‐lactam antibiotics is increasing worldwide. Consequently, novel β‐lactamase inhibitors like clavulanic acid (CLV) are co‐formulated with such antibiotics. Currently, no immunoassay is available for detecting IgE against CLV. Two possible IgE‐binding antigenic determinants of CLV were proposed as a result of protein haptenation. 16 Moreover, two benzylpenicillin‐haptenated peptides, derived from human serum albumin, were involved in sensitization to penicillin. 17

2.2. New technologies for epitope mapping and the discovery of allergens

Several official databases for searching published epitopes are available. 18 Based on the immune epitope database, 19 25 times more linear than conformational epitopes are currently reported. Besides the in silico approaches, epitopes can be defined by physicochemical and biological assays. Liposomal nanoallergen display was used to analyze the individual and combined immunogenicity of eight linear epitopes from the major peanut allergen Ara h 2. 20 For milk and peanut allergens, bead‐based epitope assays were utilized to identify patient‐specific IgE epitopes using customized peptide libraries. 21 However, such a Luminex‐based microplate setup allows only a single antibody‐isotype measurement at a time. Ara h 1‐derived peptides displayed on phages were screened using allergic patients’ sera combined with high‐throughput (HTP) sequencing, which revealed the target‐unrelated peptide (TUP) problem. 22 To overcome this issue, comprehensive putative TUP databases should be included for the screening. Immunodominant linear IgE epitopes of the oyster allergen Cra g 1 were also identified by a physicochemical method, the isothermal titration microcalorimetry. 23

On the other hand, in silico approaches enable the design of chimeric proteins, where conformational epitopes of an allergen are grafted on low or nonallergenic homologues. The conformational IgE epitope profile of the Bet v 1‐related soy allergen Gly m 4 was identified by grafting its IgE‐binding areas on related nonallergenic proteins. 24 Reversely, the olive pollen allergen Ole e 15 was mutated by introducing non‐IgE binding patches from its human homologue, which allowed the definition of conformational IgE‐binding epitopes. 25 Yet, the studies on grafting technologies were done with small patient numbers, and correctly folded mutated chimeras are difficult to produce. Other technologies to discover epitopes such as amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry, heteronuclear single quantum coherence‐NMR, monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding tests coupled with mutagenesis, and computational prediction tools, were reviewed elsewhere. 26 These novel approaches for epitope discovery are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Novel approaches in recent discoveries of allergens and epitopes

Approach Outcome and clinical implications
In silico allergen prediction Discovery of 24 previously unreported allergens from Pacific oyster, filling a major gap in the management of shellfish allergic patients 26
Liposomal nanoallergen display Analysis of the contribution of high‐ and low‐ affinity IgE binding epitopes of Ara h 2 to the allergic response 20
Bead‐based assays Validation of bead‐based epitope assays for screening of food allergy 21
Prediction of clinical status of milk allergy, identifying a new phenotype of patients who are tolerant to fermented milk products 50
Mapping of conformational epitopes using chimeras Discovery of Ole e 15 epitopes and identification of two major IgE‐binding areas 25

Finally, HTP genome and proteome screenings combined with bioinformatics are becoming state‐of‐the‐art. Previously unreported 24 Pacific oyster allergens were identified using genome information, in silico allergen prediction and confirmation by IgE immunoblots. 27

2.3. Clinically relevant cross‐reactive allergens

For the design of efficient diagnostic or immunotherapy strategies, it is crucial to understand the cross‐reactivities among allergens from various sources, which were the topic of several recent studies. The major tree nut allergens are often highly cross‐reactive. While investigating the natural Jug r 2, another walnut vicilin, Jug r 6 was discovered, which proved to be an IgE cross‐reactive marker between walnut, hazelnut, pistachio, and sesame. 11 Moreover, examining purified natural allergens is essential for the detection of native post‐translational modifications (PTMs) such as glycosylation that may be important for IgE cross‐reactivity. Concomitant sensitization to hazelnut and peanut starts early in life, and their cross‐reactivity is possibly dominated by T‐cell epitopes of the 7S vicilins Cor a 11 and Ara h 1. 28 Examples of nonhomologous proteins that cross‐react on the IgE and T‐cell levels are discussed in a recent review. 3

The structure of Can f 6 was resolved, which contributed to the understanding of its cross‐reactivity with the cat allergen Fel d 4. 29 However, conformational epitopes that selectively recognize either of these allergens are yet to be discovered to diagnose genuine dog or cat sensitization. Red meat allergy is induced by IgE specific for galactose‐α‐1,3‐galactose (α‐Gal), which is structurally similar to the blood group B‐antigen. A study of red meat allergic patients showed that blood group B individuals had almost no IgE to α‐Gal, indicating that self‐tolerance reduces the risk of developing red meat allergy. 30 The data from a multi‐center meta‐analysis showed that the presence of B‐antigen in blood reduces the risk of developing red meat allergy. 31

2.4. Structural stability of allergens

The structural stability of allergens can be an intrinsic characteristic of the proteins themselves such as heat and protease resistance or may be influenced by the presence of ligands or PTMs. 32 Allergens, when bound to their natural ligands, may present diverse oligomeric states, like Alt a 1 from Alternaria alternata, that behaves differently in the presence or absence of its natural catechol‐like ligand. 33 The tetrameric Alt a 1 holo‐form underwent receptor‐mediated endocytosis, activating the airway mucosa, while the dimeric apo‐form did not. A novel Bet v 1 ligand, phytoprostane E1, was shown to inhibit the catalytic activity of cathepsin S, a cysteine protease expressed by antigen‐presenting cells, thereby protecting the allergen from degradation. 34 nsLTPs, including Pru p 3, 35 Mal d 3, and Cor a 8, were shown to undergo conformational changes when bound to lipid ligands, which increased their IgE recognition. 36

Evidence is accumulating on the allergic sensitizing capacity of food matrix‐associated lipids, for instance in α‐Gal‐mediated delayed allergic reactions to red meat. 37 The allergenic glycan α‐Gal is present in both protein and lipid extracts from red meat. However, only α‐Gal bound to lipids was transported across the intestinal cell monolayer. Food allergen passage through the gastro‐intestinal tract depends on its stability to digestion and its absorption rate. Peanut proteins are quickly absorbed into the circulation, detectable as early as 5 minutes after ingestion, and can stay immunologically intact for up to 2 days, still capable of inducing basophil activation and wheal reaction in some patients. 38 Sensitivity of an allergen to gastro‐intestinal digestion also shapes its ability to induce oral tolerance. When the calcium‐binding residues of carp parvalbumin Cyp c 1 were mutated, the structural stability of the allergen, hence its resistance to digestion, were drastically affected. 39 Unlike the natural allergen, the mutated form could not induce prophylactic tolerance in a mouse model of fish allergy. 39

Interestingly, proteins with allergenic activity were found to be relatively more abundant and stable than nonallergens in extracts from birch pollen, timothy grass, ragweed pollen, and German cockroach. 40

3. DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES

Allergies are usually diagnosed by bronchial/nasal provocation test, oral food challenge, skin prick test (SPT), intradermal test, and allergen‐specific IgE (sIgE) quantification. Additional approaches such as basophil activation test (BAT), T‐cell proliferation, and CRD may help to improve the precision and comprehensiveness of the diagnostics (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Standard and emerging strategies for diagnosis and immunotherapy of allergic diseases

3.1. Improvements in diagnosis

Component‐resolved diagnosis provides detailed data to determine sensitization profiles, to predict outcomes for persistent allergies, and to avoid allergen challenges. In a longitudinal study with egg‐allergic infants, followed up until 4 years of age, Gal d 1‐sIgE significantly increased the risk for a persistent egg allergy further in childhood. 41 The presence of sIgE to all four known egg allergens was associated with a high risk for persistent raw‐egg allergy. CRD was also helpful to differentiate true walnut allergy from the walnut‐pecan dual allergy, reducing the need for oral food challenges. 42 While sIgE to Jug r 1 and 4 performed best in diagnosing walnut allergy, sIgE to Jug r 2, 4, and 6 indicated a dual allergy. CRD, when performed prior to a nasal provocation test (NPT), was a safe predictive tool to diagnose allergy to dog dander. 43 A positive NPT result demonstrated a strong positive correlation with multi‐sensitization to serum albumin, kallikrein, and lipocalin, and a negative correlation with Can f 5 (kallikrein) monosensitization. CRD may also have disadvantages, as shown when diagnosing true latex allergy. Since plant profilins and CCD‐bearing bromelains are highly cross‐reactive, CRD resulted in clinically irrelevant false‐positive results among atopic patients with pollen sensitization. 44 For distinguishing exclusively shellfish‐sensitized patients from those sensitized to other invertebrates like molluscs, mites, and cockroaches, a decision tree based on tropomyosin and arginine kinase sequences was proposed. 45 Such an approach, although requiring trained immunologists to determine the patients’ IgE reactivity to cross‐reactive pan‐epitopes, enables the avoidance of potential life‐threatening food challenges usually needed for diagnosis of true shellfish allergy.

Diagnosing clinically relevant food allergies caused by prior sensitization to inhalant allergens is challenging. 46 CRD fails to diagnose clinically relevant secondary food allergies, yet BAT may deliver more reliable results for certain allergies, although its standardization is needed for clinical implementation. 47 Clinically relevant hymenoptera allergy in patients with double sensitization to honeybee and vespid venoms was best diagnosed using BAT, thereby reducing the need for double venom immunotherapies. 48 A post hoc analysis including 3 peanut allergy cohorts concluded that BAT performs best to predict disease severity and the threshold of consumable peanut during oral food challenge (OFC). 49 Interestingly, a study of 70 SLIT patients showed discrepancies between the use of whole peanut extract or Ara h 2 in BAT to predict the eliciting dose in double‐blinded OFC. 50 Unlike the whole extract, Ara h 2‐induced activation of basophils did not predict the post‐SLIT tolerance development. Another approach, the Luminex peptide assay (LPA), was used to differentiate between tolerant, whole milk‐reactive, fermented milk‐reactive and baked milk‐reactive cow's milk‐allergic subjects, based on epitope‐specific IgG4 and IgE levels. 51

Due to unavailability in clinical practice, sIgE to Can s 3, and SPT with Can s 3‐rich hemp extract are advised for the diagnosis of Cannabis allergy. 52 Another rare allergy is developed to corticosteroids (CS), and is commonly misdiagnosed due to excipient additives in CS preparations. 53 An algorithm was proposed, by which several different additives in formulations could be ruled out if a preceding SPT is performed before diagnosing a genuine CS allergy.

Total allergen extracts are still widely used in routine diagnostic tests, yet potentially over‐ or underrepresented allergens are an issue. Ruethers et al tested 16 fish allergic children with 26 commercially available fish extracts in SPT. 54 A high heterogeneity in allergen content of various extracts was reported, especially for parvalbumin and collagen. A similar issue was demonstrated for natural house dust mite (HDM) extracts, in which Der p 2, 5, 21, and 23 were underrepresented. 55 Such examples encourage the use of predefined recombinant allergen mixtures that can be standardized. 56

3.2. New approaches for diagnosis

Among the new diagnostic tools, ALEX (Macroarray Diagnostics), a nano bead‐based platform for allergy diagnosis, correlated well with the widely used ImmunoCAP ISAC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 57 The nanofluidic assay (NFA) abioSCOPE® allows accurate quantification of IgE at picomolar range within 5 minutes at the point‐of‐care. 58 Validation of a chip‐based microfluidic immuno‐affinity BAT (miBAT) was compared to conventional BAT. 59 The principle of miBAT is an initial capturing of basophils from patients’ whole blood via mobilized anti‐CD203c antibodies followed by the activation with a relevant allergen. This method has several limitations such as rather low cell purity, long analysis time, and nonspecific binding of monocytes that might result in false‐positive signals. Drug metabolite‐presenting liposomes were designed to induce the degranulation of mast cells primed with allergic patients’ sera. 60 A direct correlation between the degranulation induced by liposomal nanoallergens in vitro and the severity of drug hypersensitivity reaction in vivo was reported.

The factors such as sex hormones, age and microbiome affects the incidence of food allergy. 61 , 62 Personalized approaches are hence favorable, although currently applicable only in research settings. The proof‐of‐concept of an inversed mode of CRD was reported for personalized diagnosis of cow's milk allergy. 63 Serum IgE from allergic individuals was captured and probed with allergen extracts which allowed the analysis of eluted allergens by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐MS).

4. NEW STRATEGIES FOR ALLERGEN‐SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY

The goal of AIT is clinical desensitization, meaning an increase in the threshold allergen amount needed to induce allergic symptoms. 64 The primary outcome of successful AIT is a subjective measure such as medication and/or symptom scores. 65 Furthermore, serum antibody and cytokine levels, and cellular activation markers are used for efficacy determination. 64 , 65 Conventional AIT protocols are performed over 3 years consisting of 3 phases: an initial day escalation, a buildup phase, and a maintenance period. 66

Birch pollen allergic individuals suffer from birch pollen‐related food allergies because of sequence and structural homologies between the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and related plant food allergens. Yet, birch pollen extract‐based AIT does not always improve the accompanying food allergy. In a longitudinal study, rMal d 1 sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) successfully downregulated Mal d 1‐specific Th2 responses in birch pollen‐related apple‐allergic patients. 67 The IgE inhibiting capacity of Mal d 1‐specific IgG antibodies correlated with the post‐SLIT clinical improvements. 68

Adjuvants, when co‐administered with allergens in AIT, regulate the immune reaction toward Th1‐ and Treg‐type responses. Synthetic trivalent glycocluster triacedimannose was proposed as a novel adjuvant, which induced local protection when formulated with timothy grass pollen extract, triggering significantly less inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar fluids of mice than the conventional adjuvants. 69 In birch pollen AIT, glutaraldehyde‐treated pollen extract induced tolerance via 3‐year‐long sustained IgE‐blocking IgG4 antibodies. 70 Peanut extract modified by reduction and alkylation and adsorbed to Al(OH)3 induced protective IgG antibodies in a mouse model of AIT. 71 A depigmented HDM extract was introduced epicutaneously via laser‐generated skin micropores, omitting the need for adjuvants, and performed safe and effective in a mouse model of immunotherapy. 72 Alternatively, allergen‐loaded microparticles decorated with neuraminidase from Vibrio cholerae were proven useful for targeting M‐cells for increased allergen uptake in oral immunotherapy, while inducing Th1 and Treg responses. 73 Although performed in mouse models, these results hold promise for further development of better allergoid and adjuvant formulations for use in clinical trials.

The efficacy of recombinant allergens in AIT was first proven by Pauli et al for Bet v 1. 74 Recombinant allergens from grass pollen, birch pollen, apple, peanut, fish, and insect venoms have been used in clinical trials in either allergen‐challenge or preventive settings. Among these, the recombinant grass pollen vaccine BM‐32 was shown to be safe and improve clinical symptoms. 75 Various modifications can be introduced to recombinant allergens for reducing IgE reactivity while retaining T‐cell stimulatory capacity. 76 Several novel approaches are available (Figure 1, Table 2). Hypoallergens to be used in AIT can be designed by several approaches, including producing polyvalent hybrid molecules from several allergens or introducing diverse protein modifications. The fusion of Bet v 1 and Phl p 5 is such an example, which altered their biophysical characteristics and impaired their IgE cross‐linking ability. 77 Otherwise, destruction of both linear and conformational epitopes of Ara h 2, 78 , 79 and Ara h 6 79 resulted in retained T‐cell stimulation capacity while abolishing the IgE binding.

Table 2.

Novel strategies to induce sustained unresponsiveness or to inhibit allergic disease manifestations

Strategy Vaccine component Data based on Outcome
Modified extracts, adjuvants and targeted AIT formulations Timothy grass pollen extract adjuvanted with TADM Mouse model Downregulation of eosinophil and lymphocyte counts in BAL fluid and Th2 cytokine expression 69
Depigmented glutaraldehyde‐modified birch pollen extract Patients’ samples Immune response shift toward Th1, upregulation of long‐lasting IL‐10 producing specific T cells, and IgG4 production, diminished IL‐5 production 70
Modified peanut extract Patients’ samples, human T‐cell line, mouse model Decreased IgE‐binding, upregulation of specific IgG‐mediated protection against anaphylaxis, intact T‐cell proliferation capacity 71
Depigmented HDM extract Patients’ samples, mouse model Suppression of Th2 cytokines, upregulation of allergen‐specific IgG and Tregs without the need of an adjuvant 72
Neuraminidase of Vibrio cholerae for coating allergen‐loaded microparticles Intestinal epithelial cell line, mouse model Targeting intestinal M‐cells with neuraminidase for enhanced allergen uptake in oral AIT 73
Allergen modifications Phl p 5‐Bet v 1 hybrid Patients’ samples IgE‐reactive but hypoallergenic when compared to equimolar mixes of allergen monomers 77
Reduced and alkylated Ara h 2 Patients’ samples, mouse model Reduced basophil activation, retained capacity to stimulate T‐cell proliferation 78
Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 mutants with disrupted linear and conformational epitopes Patients’ samples Reduced basophil activation, up to 1000‐fold decrease in IgE cross‐linking capacity 79
Peptide‐IT Alkaline casein hydrosylate Patients’ samples Reduced IgE‐binding, hypoallergenic activity 80
Virus‐like particles Cucumber mosaic virus‐based particles expressing Ara h 1 or Ara h 2 Mouse model Downregulation of eosinophil and mast cell infiltration of the gastro‐intestinal tract after OFC, diminished local reactions after SPT, upregulation of specific IgG‐mediated protection against anaphylaxis 84
Acinetobacter phage coat protein‐based particles displaying Der p 2 Mouse model Downregulation of eosinophils in BAL fluid, upregulation of allergen‐specific IgG and alveolar macrophages 85
Membrane‐enveloped shielded Art v 1 Patients’ samples, mouse model Local Treg induction correlated with downregulation of Th2 cytokines, diminished airway hyperresponsiveness upon challenge, VLPs target T cells selectively without inducing IgE 87
mAbs and other drugs Bet v 1‐specific ScFv Patients’ samples Bet v 1‐specific ScFv clone recognized homologous allergens (ie, Mal d 1, Cor a 1, Aln g 1) 90
Fel d 1‐specific IgG antibodies Patients’ samples, mouse model 60% decline in nasal symptom score, 50% reduced wheal response in SPT 91
anti‐Fel d 1 IgY Patients’ samples, cat model Egg yolk products when added to cat's diet neutralized Fel d 1 in the cat, patients' allergic symptoms reduced 92
anti‐IL‐4Rα/IL‐5‐bispecific antibody Mouse model Diminished airway eosinophilia, prevention of goblet cell metaplasia 93
Ligelizumab Patients’ samples, mouse model Increased affinity to IgE, long‐lasting suppression of serum IgE levels by a single dose 95

Food‐allergic patients may have severe reactions during AIT when intact allergens are administered. Peptide‐based approaches offer safer alternatives and may induce bystander tolerance. An edible alkaline casein hydrolysate, which preserved T‐cell immunodominant peptides, showed reduced specific antibody binding in a phase 1 study. 80 In an animal model of dual‐allergen sensitization to Fel d 1 and ovalbumin, treatment with Fel d 1‐derived peptides alone protected mice from subsequent challenges to both cat dander extract and the unrelated allergen ovalbumin. 81 Later, an interventional phase 3 trial was set up with the aforementioned Fel d 1‐derived peptides to asses safety and tolerability of the drug. However, the study failed due to an extraordinary high placebo effect. 82 , 83

Virus‐like particles (VLP), consisting of a repetitive three‐dimensional scaffold based on viral coat proteins, display allergens on the surface. Peanut‐sensitized mice were protected from anaphylaxis upon whole peanut extract challenge when treated with a VLP‐based vaccine displaying either Ara h 1 or 2. 84 Similarly, a VLP‐based vaccine displaying Der p 2, when applied prior to sensitization, prevented the development of allergic symptoms via inducing blocking IgG antibodies in a mouse model of HDM allergy. 85 Several VLP‐based vaccines are already commercially available for certain diseases, 86 yet the implementation in an allergy setting is also promising. The major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 was used to produce allergen containing liposomes, which were hypoallergenic in a prophylactic setting when the allergens were not surface‐exposed. 87 In the context of the hygiene hypothesis, arabinogalactans from cowshed dust extract were shown to bind human dendritic cells (DCs) and downregulate subsequent T‐cell stimulation. 88 Such molecules could be added in formulations while designing prophylactic vaccines.

Antigen‐specific human mAbs can be produced utilizing humanized mice, phage display, by generating mAbs from immortalized human memory B cells, or by retrieving the sequence of immunoglobulin genes from single B cell clones. 89 A combinatorial phage‐displayed single‐chain variable fragment (ScFv) library was constructed from the PBMCs of a nonallergic individual, who had been immunized with hypoallergenic Bet v 1 fragments. 90 Bet v 1‐specific phage clones were converted into soluble ScFvs, which recognized native Bet v 1 and its homologues from alder pollen, hazelnut and apple. AIT‐induced affinity‐selected human monoclonal IgG4 prevented IgE engagement of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 in a clinical study conducted with cat‐allergic patients. 91 Moreover, polyclonal anti‐Fel d 1 chicken antibodies produced in eggs were able to neutralize the allergen in the cat when these eggs were added to its diet. 92 Outbred llamas are exploited for their immune responses with a wide diversity of Ab variable regions, and were used to produce bispecific antibodies against type 2 cytokines. 93 So far, the best‐characterized mAb for allergy treatment is omalizumab. However, its use has certain limitations such as high costs and strict patient exclusion criteria. 94 The use of ligelizumab was reported for its better inhibition of IgE‐binding to FcεRI, basophil activation, IgE production by B cells and passive systemic anaphylaxis. 95

A novel technique was developed to sequence single cell RNA samples via 3’ barcoding, thus allowing reliable sequence recovery of T‐cell receptor and complementarity‐determining region 3. 96 Such innovations are essential when T‐cell clonotypic responses shape the outcome of a therapy, as in AIT. Whole‐exome sequencing of B cells led to the discovery of novel convergent sequences of VH regions of peanut‐specific IgE. 97 Both IgE‐ and IgG4‐expressing B cells belonged to the same clonal family. Two unrelated peanut allergic individuals’ IgE‐expressing plasmablasts shared highly similar variable regions from heavy and light chains, holding promise for further development of mAbs competing with serum IgE. 98

5. EMERGING BIOMARKERS IN ALLERGY

Allergy covers a variety of disease manifestations which all have in common the involvement of IgE. Biomarkers are needed to classify these diseases manifestations, as IgE alone is not specific enough. Precision medicine requires biomarkers for choosing the correct treatment of patients displaying various forms of allergic diseases. Recently, biomarker discovery has gained momentum.

5.1. Diagnostic biomarkers

Clinically applicable biomarkers for diagnosing asthma were characterized by the “SAVED” model which was reported in an EAACI position paper. 99 Type 2‐mediated, allergy associated asthma biomarkers include cytokines such as IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐13, TSLP, IL‐25, IL‐33 from effector lymphocytes, eosinophils and epithelial cells. Moreover, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), exhaled volatile organic compounds, blood eosinophil count and serum IgE are among the conventional biomarkers that can be measured at the point‐of‐care. Recently, IGFALS (insulin‐like growth factor binding protein, acid labile subunit) was identified as a biomarker to differentiate allergic from nonallergic asthma subtypes. 100 Circulating microRNAs may also help distinguishing between asthma subgroups, furthermore their expression levels correlated with disease development and clinical parameters. 101

Eiwegger et al reviewed cellular and soluble biomarkers that are clinically relevant for food allergy. 102 The IgE recognition and disease severity correlated with epitope abundance, diversity, and proximity on allergens in case of food allergy. More overlapping epitopes are recognized by both IgE and other isotypes such as IgG4 and IgA, as the disease progresses. In persistent egg and cow's milk allergy, increased numbers of circulating innate immune cells and downregulation of epigenetic markers, respectively, are examples of promising research to find novel targets in diagnosis and therapy. 103 , 104 In a metastudy including 1950 subjects, mucosal biomarkers associated with food allergy were summarized. 105 Indicators of gut inflammation included eosinophil cationic protein, fecal calprotectin, and α1‐antitrypsin, whereas IgE and IgA indicated allergy. The soluble form of the high‐affinity IgE receptor, sFcεRI, was proposed as an accurate indicator of IgE sensitization. 106 Finding cellular subsets and surface markers that are associated with type 2 hypersensitivity is necessary. A novel pathogenic subset of Th2 cells was associated with peanut allergy, namely the Th2A subset. 107 Moreover, the inhibitory transmembrane molecule CD200R was identified as stably expressed surface marker on peanut allergen‐specific cells that are involved in type 2 immune responses. 108

5.2. Biomarkers for monitoring AIT

Suitable biomarkers for monitoring the success of an immunotherapy depend on the disease and treatment. In allergic asthma, eosinophil counts in blood or sputum, and FeNO values are acknowledged as well‐established predictors of treatment efficacy with corticosteroids. 99 Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 and periostin are potential biomarkers to monitor anti‐IL‐13 monoclonal antibody treatment whereas urinary leukotriene E4 is proposed in the case of atopic asthma management with anti‐leukotrienes, yet all await validation. 99

Sustained unresponsiveness is the goal of AIT and its monitoring is not straightforward since there are objective biomarkers to be defined for each type of allergy. 109 An EAACI taskforce review grouped biomarkers for AIT of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma into seven domains. 110 Biomarkers were categorized into serum levels of antibody subclasses, cellular activation markers, soluble messenger molecules and in vivo tests. Each domain was critically evaluated with unmet needs for promoting further clinical implementation. Regulatory types of cells with potential uses in immunotherapy follow‐up studies are continuously discovered. 66 Emerging data indicate regulatory innate lymphoid cells (ILCregs) as a candidate biomarker cell type for monitoring the successful tolerance induction following an AIT. 111 Although not validated yet, serum levels of vitamin D may provide an insight for natural tolerance development in egg‐allergic infants and cow's milk‐allergic children. 103 , 112

Omalizumab has been approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria. 113 Accordingly, total serum IgE levels, serum autoantibody levels and lack of basophil activation can be used to monitor the response. 114 In a post hoc analysis of atopic diseases, absolute eosinophil counts correlated with patients’ improvements after therapeutic interventions. 115 A critical evaluation is needed when comorbidities are present as the profile of the analyzed biomarkers may change.

6. NOVEL DISCOVERIES IN MECHANISMS OF ALLERGIC SENSITIZATION

Only a minority of the population develops allergic sensitization to certain proteins. The biological function of allergenic proteins, the genetic predisposition, and environmental factors are all involved in the training of the immune system and contribute to this process. 116 , 117 A recent review by Ozias‐Akins and Breiteneder underscored the link between the defense functions of seed storage proteins and their sensitizing capacity. 116 Many peanut allergens display anti‐microbial/fungal properties by disrupting pathogen membranes, inhibiting pathogen growth, or they regulate cell mobility.

Allergic sensitization is also influenced by other components from allergen sources. African green monkeys developed peanut‐specific IgG but not IgE when sensitization with defatted peanut extract was performed, 118 possibly due to the lack of peanut lipids. Moreover, peanut lipids acted as adjuvants on human keratinocytes, inducing pro‐inflammatory response and potentially aiding allergic sensitization. 119 Similarly, low molecular weight components from bony fish extracts induced barrier damage and pro‐inflammatory cytokine release by bronchial epithelial cells. 120

When provided the right milieu of cytokines, antibodies undergo class‐switch recombination, which decides the quality of the immune response. In peanut allergy, the class switch to IgE occurs already in the gut, 121 supporting the emerging evidence of germinal center‐independent class‐switching. 122 Nonetheless, the period of allergen exposure can affect the residence of IgE‐switched plasma cells and their half‐life. 123

Sequence differences of the pattern recognition receptor dectin‐1 on respiratory epithelial cells were reported between allergic and healthy individuals. 124 This study showed a critical role of dectin‐1 variants in regulating IL‐33 homeostasis. Other important players at the epithelial barrier are innate lymphoid 2 cells which may express CD1a and present lipid antigens. 125 In addition, formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) from DCs were studied in the context of antigen presentation. 126 Peptide metabolites from the allergenic lipocalins, but not from nonallergenic homologues, activated FPR3 signaling and abrogated IL‐12 production.

7. CONCLUSIONS

Molecular allergology has come a long way since its start in the late 1980s. 2 While most, if not all of the important allergen types have been identified, 127 future research will have to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of allergic sensitization and define the signal transduction cascades that ultimately lead to the production of sIgE. This will impact on prevention strategies. Furthermore, recent advances in molecular‐based allergy diagnosis should be implemented into routine diagnosis to improve patient management and to decide on personalized approaches for immunotherapy, as recently discussed by Ansotegui et al. 128

Developing novel technologies for use in allergy diagnosis and management is crucial since it (a) aids to an in‐depth understanding of the disease, (b) collects information on advantages and disadvantages of each method for each type of allergy, and (c) encourages further research for advancing top‐notch techniques that are clinically applicable, effective and affordable. Novel treatments using next‐generation adjuvants, biologics, and small molecules are expected to advance treatment options. Allergy vaccines will be improved and fine‐tuned with the aim to achieve long‐lasting improvements. As shown in Box 2 on future research perspectives, there are many fields where molecular allergology will move forward.

Box 2.

1.

Future research perspectives in molecular allergology.

Allergen characterization and modification

  • Provide more structures of allergens bound with their natural ligands

  • Design hypoallergenic versions of more of the clinically relevant allergens

Allergic sensitization

  • Decipher signal transduction cascades induced by allergens in innate immune cells

  • Identify the genetic mechanisms of allergic predisposition

Allergy diagnosis and immunotherapy

  • Define the most accurate approaches to diagnose each type of allergy

  • Correlate sIgE with clinical symptoms of specific types of allergy

  • Evaluate and validate predictive biomarkers of allergy and markers that predict treatment response

  • Design vaccine formulations for tolerance induction

  • Define the role of biologics and small molecules in AIT

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors ÖÜ and HB gratefully acknowledge the support of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Doctoral Program MCCA W1248‐B30. The authors also wish to thank Anna Głobińska for help in preparing the figure.

Üzülmez Ö, Kalic T, Breiteneder H. Advances and novel developments in molecular allergology. Allergy. 2020;75:3027–3038. 10.1111/all.14579

REFERENCES

  • 1. Breiteneder H, Diamant Z, Eiwegger T, et al. Future research trends in understanding the mechanisms underlying allergic diseases for improved patient care. Allergy. 2019;74(12):2293‐2311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tscheppe A, Breiteneder H. Recombinant allergens in structural biology, diagnosis, and immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(4):187‐202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bublin M, Breiteneder H. Cross‐reactivities of non‐homologous allergens. Allergy. 2020;75(5):1019‐1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Eguiluz‐Gracia I, Tay TR, Hew M, et al. Recent developments and highlights in biomarkers in allergic diseases and asthma. Allergy. 2018;73(12):2290‐2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pfaar O, Agache I, de Blay F, et al. Perspectives in allergen immunotherapy: 2019 and beyond. Allergy. 2019;74(Suppl 108):3‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Guntern P, Eggel A. Past, present, and future of anti‐IgE biologics. Allergy. 2020;75:2491‐2502. 10.1111/all.14308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Roth‐Walter F, Adcock IM, Benito‐Villalvilla C, et al. Comparing biologicals and small molecule drug therapies for chronic respiratory diseases: an EAACI taskforce on immunopharmacology position paper. Allergy. 2019;74(3):432‐448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sookrung N, Reamtong O, Poolphol R, et al. Glutathione S‐transferase (GST) of American cockroach, Periplaneta americana: classes, isoforms, and allergenicity. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Glesner J, Filep S, Vailes LD, et al. Allergen content in German cockroach extracts and sensitization profiles to a new expanded set of cockroach allergens determine in vitro extract potency for IgE reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(4):1474‐1481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pablos I, Eichhorn S, Briza P, et al. Proteomic profiling of the weed feverfew, a neglected pollen allergen source. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dubiela P, Kabasser S, Smargiasso N, et al. Jug r 6 is the allergenic vicilin present in walnut responsible for IgE cross‐reactivities to other tree nuts and seeds. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kalic T, Morel‐Codreanu F, Radauer C, et al. Patients allergic to fish tolerate ray based on the low allergenicity of its parvalbumin. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(2):500‐508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Perez‐Riverol A, Miehe M, Jabs F, et al. Venoms of Neotropical wasps lack cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants enabling reliable protein‐based specific IgE determination. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(5):1917‐1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Monsalve RI, Vega A, Marques L, et al. Component‐resolved diagnosis of vespid venom‐allergic individuals: phospholipases and antigen 5s are necessary to identify vespula or polistes sensitization. Allergy. 2012;67(4):528‐536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schiener M, Hilger C, Eberlein B, et al. The high molecular weight dipeptidyl peptidase IV Pol d 3 is a major allergen of polistes dominula venom. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Barbero N, Fernandez‐Santamaria R, Mayorga C, et al. Identification of an antigenic determinant of clavulanic acid responsible for IgE‐mediated reactions. Allergy. 2019;74(8):1490‐1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Azoury ME, Fili L, Bechara R, et al. Identification of T‐cell epitopes from benzylpenicillin conjugated to human serum albumin and implication in penicillin allergy. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1662‐1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Radauer C, Breiteneder H. Allergen databases‐A critical evaluation. Allergy. 2019;74(11):2057‐2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) . https://www.iedb.org/. Accessed April 30, 2020
  • 20. Deak PE, Vrabel MR, Kiziltepe T, Bilgicer B. Determination of crucial immunogenic epitopes in major peanut allergy protein, Ara h 2, via novel nanoallergen platform. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Suprun M, Getts R, Raghunathan R, et al. Novel bead‐based epitope assay is a sensitive and reliable tool for profiling epitope‐specific antibody repertoire in food allergy. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Christiansen A, Kringelum JV, Hansen CS, et al. High‐throughput sequencing enhanced phage display enables the identification of patient‐specific epitope motifs in serum. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fang L, Li G, Zhang J, Gu R, Cai M, Lu J. Identification and mutational analysis of continuous, immunodominant epitopes of the major oyster allergen Crag 1. Clin Immunol. 2019;201:20‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Husslik F, Nurnberg J, Seutter von Loetzen C, et al. The conformational IgE epitope profile of soya bean allergen Gly m 4. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46(11):1484‐1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. San Segundo‐Acosta P, Oeo‐Santos C, Navas A, Jurado A, Villalba M, Barderas R. Ole e 15 and its human counterpart ‐PPIA‐ chimeras reveal an heterogeneous IgE response in olive pollen allergic patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Breiteneder H. Mapping of conformational IgE epitopes of food allergens. Allergy. 2018;73(11):2107‐2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nugraha R, Kamath SD, Johnston E, et al. Rapid and comprehensive discovery of unreported shellfish allergens using large‐scale transcriptomic and proteomic resources. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1501‐1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Masthoff LJN, Pasmans S, van Doorn H, et al. Major hazelnut and peanut allergens are potent in basophil activation and cross‐react at T‐cell level. Allergy. 2018;73(10):2080‐2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yamamoto K, Ishibashi O, Sugiura K, et al. Crystal structure of the dog allergen Can f 6 and structure‐based implications of its cross‐reactivity with the cat allergen Fel d 4. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Apostolovic D, Rodrigues R, Thomas P, Starkhammar M, Hamsten C, van Hage M. Immunoprofile of alpha‐Gal‐ and B‐antigen‐specific responses differentiates red meat‐allergic patients from healthy individuals. Allergy. 2018;73(7):1525‐1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Brestoff JR, Tesfazghi MT, Zaydman MA, et al. The B antigen protects against the development of red meat allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1790‐1791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pekar J, Ret D, Untersmayr E. Stability of allergens. Mol Immunol. 2018;100:14‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Garrido‐Arandia M, Tome‐Amat J, Pazos‐Castro D, et al. Interaction of Alt a 1 with SLC22A17 in the airway mucosa. Allergy. 2019;74(11):2167‐2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Soh WT, Aglas L, Mueller GA, et al. Multiple roles of Bet v 1 ligands in allergen stabilization and modulation of endosomal protease activity. Allergy. 2019;74(12):2382‐2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dubiela P, Aina R, Polak D, et al. Enhanced Pru p 3 IgE‐binding activity by selective free fatty acid‐interaction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(6):1728‐1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Aina R, Dubiela P, Geiselhart S, et al. Distinct lipid transfer proteins display different IgE‐binding activities that are affected by fatty acid binding. Allergy. 2019;74(4):827‐831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Roman‐Carrasco P, Lieder B, Somoza V, et al. Only alpha‐Gal bound to lipids, but not to proteins, is transported across enterocytes as an IgE‐reactive molecule that can induce effector cell activation. Allergy. 2019;74(10):1956‐1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pahlow Mose A, Mortz E, Stahl Skov P, et al. The quest for ingested peanut protein in human serum. Allergy. 2020;75(7):1721‐1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Freidl R, Gstottner A, Baranyi U, et al. Resistance of parvalbumin to gastrointestinal digestion is required for profound and long‐lasting prophylactic oral tolerance. Allergy. 2020;75(2):326‐335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Cabrera A, Randall TA, Ogburn RN, et al. Are allergens more abundant and/or more stable than other proteins in pollens and dust? Allergy. 2020;75(5):1267‐1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dang TD, Peters RL, Koplin JJ, et al. Egg allergen specific IgE diversity predicts resolution of egg allergy in the population cohort HealthNuts. Allergy. 2019;74(2):318‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Elizur A, Appel MY, Nachshon L, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of walnut and pecan allergy (NUT CRACKER Study). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(1):157‐165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Käck U, Asarnoj A, Grönlund H, et al. Molecular allergy diagnostics refine characterization of children sensitized to dog dander. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(4):1113‐1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gurlek F, Unsel M, Ardeniz O, et al. Misleading allergens in the diagnosis of latex allergy: profilin and cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;176(1):1‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Nugraha R, Kamath SD, Johnston E, Karnaneedi S, Ruethers T, Lopata AL. Conservation analysis of B‐cell allergen epitopes to predict clinical cross‐reactivity between shellfish and inhalant invertebrate allergens. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Faber MA, Van Gasse AL, Decuyper II, et al. Cross‐reactive aeroallergens: which need to cross our mind in food allergy diagnosis? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):1813‐1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Hemmings O, Kwok M, McKendry R, Santos AF. Basophil activation test: old and new applications in allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(12):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Bokanovic D, Arzt‐Gradwohl L, Schwarz I, et al. Possible utility of basophil activation test in dual honeybee and vespid sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(1):392‐394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Santos AF, Du Toit G, O'Rourke C, et al. Biomarkers of severity and threshold of allergic reactions during oral peanut challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(2):344‐355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chapuis A, Thevenot J, Coutant F, et al. Ara h 2 basophil activation test does not predict clinical reactivity to peanut. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1772‐1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sackesen C, Suarez‐Farinas M, Silva R, et al. A new Luminex‐based peptide assay to identify reactivity to baked, fermented, and whole milk. Allergy. 2019;74(2):327‐336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Decuyper II, Van Gasse AL, Faber MA, et al. Exploring the diagnosis and profile of cannabis allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(3):983‐989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Li PH, Wagner A, Thomas I, Watts TJ, Rutkowski R, Rutkowski K. Steroid allergy: clinical features and the importance of excipient testing in a diagnostic algorithm. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1655‐1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ruethers T, Taki AC, Nugraha R, et al. Variability of allergens in commercial fish extracts for skin prick testing. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1352‐1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Huang H‐J, Resch‐Marat Y, Rodriguez‐Dominguez A, et al. Underestimation of house dust mite‐specific IgE with extract‐based ImmunoCAPs compared with molecular ImmunoCAPs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(5):1656‐1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Valenta R, Karaulov A, Niederberger V, et al. Allergen extracts for in vivo diagnosis and treatment of allergy: is there a future? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):1845‐1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bojcukova J, Vlas T, Forstenlechner P, Panzner P. Comparison of two multiplex arrays in the diagnostics of allergy. Clin Transl Allergy. 2019;9(1):31. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Roethlisberger S, Karoui O, Mapelli D, et al. Novel nanofluidic IgE assay versus a reference method: a real‐world comparison. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2019;180(1):28‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Aljadi Z, Kalm F, Nilsson C, et al. A novel tool for clinical diagnosis of allergy operating a microfluidic immunoaffinity basophil activation test technique. Clin Immunol. 2019;209:108268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Deak PE, Kim B, Adnan A, et al. Nanoallergen platform for detection of platin drug allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(5):1957‐1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Pali‐Scholl I, Jensen‐Jarolim E. Gender aspects in food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;19(3):249‐255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Schwarzer M, Hermanova P, Srutkova D, et al. Germ‐free mice exhibit mast cells with impaired functionality and gut homing and do not develop food allergy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Frossard M, Gasilova N, Arlettaz L, Dayer E, Girault HH. Personalized and rapid test for food‐related allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(6):2297‐2300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Pajno GB, Fernandez‐Rivas M, Arasi S, et al. EAACI Guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: IgE‐mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2018;73(4):799‐815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pfaar O, Lou H, Zhang Y, Klimek L, Zhang L. Recent developments and highlights in allergen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2018;73(12):2274‐2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Alvaro‐Lozano M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, et al. EAACI Allergen immunotherapy user's guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020;31(Suppl 25):1‐101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kitzmuller C, Jahn‐Schmid B, Kinaciyan T, Bohle B. Sublingual immunotherapy with recombinant Mal d 1 downregulates the allergen‐specific Th2 response. Allergy. 2019;74(8):1579‐1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Sanchez Acosta G, Kinaciyan T, Kitzmuller C, Mobs C, Pfutzner W, Bohle B. IgE‐blocking antibodies following SLIT with recombinant Mal d 1 accord with improved apple allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;S0091‐6749(20)30418‐8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lehto M, Wolff H, Leino R, Alenius H, Savolainen J. A novel glycocluster molecule prevents timothy‐induced allergic airway inflammation in mice. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1700‐1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Rauber MM, Wu HK, Adams B, et al. Birch pollen allergen‐specific immunotherapy with glutaraldehyde‐modified allergoid induces IL‐10 secretion and protective antibody responses. Allergy. 2019;74(8):1575‐1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. van der Kleij HPM, Warmenhoven HJM, van Ree R, et al. Chemically modified peanut extract shows increased safety while maintaining immunogenicity. Allergy. 2019;74(5):986‐995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Korotchenko E, Moya R, Scheiblhofer S, et al. Laser facilitated epicutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented house dust mite extract alleviates allergic responses in a mouse model of allergic lung inflammation. Allergy. 2020;75(5):1217‐1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Diesner SC, Bergmayr C, Wang XY, et al. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase as an immunomodulator for novel formulation of oral allergy immunotherapy. Clin Immunol. 2018;192:30‐39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Pauli G, Larsen TH, Rak S, et al. Efficacy of recombinant birch pollen vaccine for the treatment of birch‐allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(5):951‐960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Niederberger V, Neubauer A, Gevaert P, et al. Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with the recombinant B‐cell epitope‐based grass pollen vaccine BM32. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(2):497‐509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Satitsuksanoa P, Globinska A, Jansen K, van de Veen W, Akdis M. Modified allergens for immunotherapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(2):9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Najafi N, Hofer G, Gattinger P, et al. Fusion proteins consisting of Bet v 1 and Phl p 5 form IgE‐reactive aggregates with reduced allergenic activity. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Tscheppe A, Palmberger D, van Rijt L, et al. Development of a novel Ara h 2 hypoallergen with no IgE binding or anaphylactogenic activity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(1):229‐238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Bublin M, Kostadinova M, Radauer C, et al. Engineering of structural variants of the major peanut allergens Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 for allergen‐specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(3):1226‐1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ueno HM, Kato T, Ohnishi H, et al. Hypoallergenic casein hydrolysate for peptide‐based oral immunotherapy in cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(1):330‐333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Moldaver DM, Bharhani MS, Rudulier CD, Wattie J, Inman MD, Larché M. Induction of bystander tolerance and immune deviation after Fel d 1 peptide immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(3):1087‐1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Clinical trials . https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01620762. Accessed July 13, 2020
  • 83. Rudulier CD, Tonti E, James E, Kwok WW, Larche M. Modulation of CRTh2 expression on allergen‐specific T cells following peptide immunotherapy. Allergy. 2019;74(11):2157‐2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Storni F, Zeltins A, Balke I, et al. Vaccine against peanut allergy based on engineered virus‐like particles displaying single major peanut allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(4):1240‐1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Soongrung T, Mongkorntanyatip K, Peepim T, et al. Virus like particles displaying major HDM allergen Der p 2 for prophylactic allergen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2020;75(5):1232‐1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Mohsen MO, Zha L, Cabral‐Miranda G, Bachmann MF. Major findings and recent advances in virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines. Semin Immunol. 2017;34:123‐132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Kratzer B, Kohler C, Hofer S, et al. Prevention of allergy by virus‐like nanoparticles (VNP) delivering shielded versions of major allergens in a humanized murine allergy model. Allergy. 2019;74(2):246‐260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Peters M, Guidato PM, Peters K, et al. Allergy‐protective arabinogalactan modulates human dendritic cells via C‐type lectins and inhibition of NF‐ĸB. J Immunol. 2016;196(4):1626‐1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. James LK. The cloning and expression of human monoclonal antibodies: implications for allergen immunotherapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16(2):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Gadermaier E, Marth K, Lupinek C, et al. Isolation of a high‐affinity Bet v 1‐specific IgG‐derived ScFv from a subject vaccinated with hypoallergenic Bet v 1 fragments. Allergy. 2018;73(7):1425‐1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Orengo JM, Radin AR, Kamat V, et al. Treating cat allergy with monoclonal IgG antibodies that bind allergen and prevent IgE engagement. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Satyaraj E, Wedner HJ, Bousquet J. Keep the cat, change the care pathway: a transformational approach to managing Fel d 1, the major cat allergen. Allergy. 2019;74(Suppl 107):5‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Godar M, Deswarte K, Vergote K, et al. A bispecific antibody strategy to target multiple type 2 cytokines in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(4):1185‐1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Dantzer JA, Wood RA. The use of omalizumab in allergen immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48(3):232‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Gasser P, Tarchevskaya SS, Guntern P, et al. The mechanistic and functional profile of the therapeutic anti‐IgE antibody ligelizumab differs from omalizumab. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Tu AA, Gierahn TM, Monian B, et al. TCR sequencing paired with massively parallel 3' RNA‐seq reveals clonotypic T cell signatures. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(12):1692‐1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Croote D, Darmanis S, Nadeau KC, Quake SR. High‐affinity allergen‐specific human antibodies cloned from single IgE B cell transcriptomes. Science. 2018;362(6420):1306‐1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Gould HJ, Ramadani F. Peanut allergen‐specific antibodies go public. Science. 2018;362(6420):1247‐1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Diamant Z, Vijverberg S, Alving K, et al. Toward clinically applicable biomarkers for asthma: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2019;74(10):1835‐1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Nieto‐Fontarigo JJ, Gonzalez‐Barcala FJ, Andrade‐Bulos LJ, et al. iTRAQ‐based proteomic analysis reveals potential serum biomarkers of allergic and non‐allergic asthma. Allergy. 2020;75:3171‐3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Weidner J, Ekerljung L, Malmhall C, Miron N, Radinger M. Circulating microRNAs correlate to clinical parameters in individuals with allergic and non‐allergic asthma. Resp Res. 2020;21(1).107 10.1186/s12931-020-01351-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Eiwegger T, Hung L, San Diego KE, O'Mahony L, Upton J. Recent developments and highlights in food allergy. Allergy. 2019;74(12):2355‐2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Neeland MR, Koplin JJ, Dang TD, et al. Early life innate immune signatures of persistent food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(3):857‐864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. D'Argenio V, Del Monaco V, Paparo L, et al. Altered miR‐193a‐5p expression in children with cow's milk allergy. Allergy. 2018;73(2):379‐386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Guerra ENS, Acevedo AC, de Toledo IP, Combes A, Chardin H. Do mucosal biomarkers reveal the immunological state associated with food allergy? Allergy. 2018;73(12):2392‐2394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Monino‐Romero S, Lexmond WS, Singer J, et al. Soluble FcεRI: a biomarker for IgE‐mediated diseases. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1381‐1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Wambre E, Bajzik V, DeLong JH, et al. A phenotypically and functionally distinct human T(H)2 cell subpopulation is associated with allergic disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(401).eaam9171 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam9171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Blom LH, Martel BC, Larsen LF, et al. The immunoglobulin superfamily member CD200R identifies cells involved in type 2 immune responses. Allergy. 2017;72(7):1081‐1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Kim EH, Burks AW. Food allergy immunotherapy: oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Allergy. 2020;75(6):1337‐1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Shamji MH, Kappen JH, Akdis M, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2017;72(8):1156‐1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Morita H, Kubo T, Ruckert B, et al. Induction of human regulatory innate lymphoid cells from group 2 innate lymphoid cells by retinoic acid. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(6):2190‐2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Sardecka‐Milewska I, Los‐Rycharska E, Gawryjolek J, Toporowska‐Kowalska E, Krogulska A. Role of FOXP3 expression and serum vitamin D and C concentrations when predicting acquisition of tolerance in infants with cow's milk allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2020;30(3):182‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Larenas‐Linnemann DES, Parisi CAS, Ritchie C, et al. Update on omalizumab for urticaria: what's new in the literature from mechanisms to clinic. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(5):33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Puxeddu I, Petrelli F, Angelotti F, Croia C, Migliorini P. Biomarkers in chronic spontaneous urticaria: current targets and clinical implications. J Asthma Allergy. 2019;12:285‐295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Cafone J, Ruffner MA, Spergel JM. The role of eosinophils in immunotherapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020;20(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Ozias‐Akins P, Breiteneder H. The functional biology of peanut allergens and possible links to their allergenicity. Allergy. 2019;74(5):888‐898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Zhang H, Kaushal A, Merid SK, et al. DNA methylation and allergic sensitizations: a genome‐scale longitudinal study during adolescence. Allergy. 2019;74(6):1166‐1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Kulis MD, Smeekens JM, Kavanagh K, Jorgensen MJ. Peanut applied to the skin of nonhuman primates induces antigen‐specific IgG but not IgE. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020;8(2):211‐215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Palladino C, Narzt MS, Bublin M, et al. Peanut lipids display potential adjuvanticity by triggering a pro‐inflammatory response in human keratinocytes. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1746‐1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Kalic T, Ellinger I, Kamath SD, et al. Fish‐derived low molecular weight components modify bronchial epithelial barrier properties and release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Mol Immunol. 2019;112:140‐150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Hoh RA, Joshi SA, Lee JY, et al. Origins and clonal convergence of gastrointestinal IgE(+) B cells in human peanut allergy. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(45):eaay4209 10.1126/sciimmunol.aay4209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Roco JA, Mesin L, Binder SC, et al. Class‐switch recombination occurs infrequently in germinal centers. Immunity. 2019;51(2):337‐350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Asrat S, Kaur N, Liu X, et al. Chronic allergen exposure drives accumulation of long‐lived IgE plasma cells in the bone marrow, giving rise to serological memory. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(43):eaav8402 10.1126/sciimmunol.aav8402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Gour N, Lajoie S, Smole U, et al. Dysregulated invertebrate tropomyosin‐dectin‐1 interaction confers susceptibility to allergic diseases. Sci Immunol. 2018;3(20):eaam9841 10.1126/sciimmunol.aam9841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Hardman CS, Chen YL, Salimi M, et al. CD1a presentation of endogenous antigens by group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Sci Immunol. 2017;2(18):eaan5918 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan5918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Klaver D, Posch B, Geisler A, Hermann M, Reider N, Heufler C. Peptides from allergenic lipocalins bind to formyl peptide receptor 3 in human dendritic cells to mediate TH2 immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(2):654‐665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Allfam . http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/allfam/. Accessed July 13, 2020
  • 128. Steering Committee Authors; Review Panel Members . A WAO ‐ ARIA ‐ GA2LEN consensus document on molecular‐based allergy diagnosis (PAMD@): update 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(2):100091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Allergy are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES