Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Sep 28;46(12):2598–2604. doi: 10.1111/jog.14504

Feasibility and outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A Japanese experience

Seiji Wada 1, Katsusuke Ozawa 1, Rika Sugibayashi 1, Fumio Suyama 1, Shoichiro Amari 1, Yushi Ito 1, Yutaka Kanamori 2, Hiroomi Okuyama 3, Noriaki Usui 4, Jun Sasahara 5, Tomomi Kotani 6, Masahiro Hayakawa 7, Kiyoko Kato 8, Tomoaki Taguchi 9, Masayuki Endo 10, Haruhiko Sago 1,
PMCID: PMC7756773  PMID: 32989906

Abstract

Aim

To present the feasibility, safety and outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) for the treatment of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

Methods

This was a single‐arm clinical trial of FETO for isolated left‐sided CDH with liver herniation and Kitano Grade 3 stomach position (>50% stomach herniation into the right chest). FETO was performed at 27–29 weeks of gestation for cases with observed/expected lung to head ratio (o/e LHR) <25% and at 30–31 weeks for cases with o/e LHR ≥25%.

Results

Eleven cases were enrolled between March 2014 and March 2016, and balloon insertion was successful in all cases. The median o/e LHR at entry was 27% (range, 20–33%). The median gestational age at FETO was 30.9 (range, 27.1–31.7) weeks. There were no severe maternal adverse events. One fetus died unexpectedly at 33 weeks of gestation due to cord strangulation by the detached amniotic membrane. There were 3 cases (27%) of preterm premature rupture of membranes. In all 10 cases, balloon removal at 34–35 weeks of gestation was successful. The median gestational age at delivery was 36.5 (range, 34.2–38.3) weeks. The median duration of occlusion and the median interval between balloon insertion and delivery were 26 days (range: 17–49 days) and 43 days (range, 21–66 days), respectively. Both the survival rate at 90 days of age and the rate of survival to discharge were 45% (5/11).

Conclusion

The FETO is feasible without maternal morbidity in Japan and could be offered to women whose fetuses show severe isolated left‐sided CDH to accelerate fetal lung growth.

Keywords: adverse events, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, fetal mortality, fetal therapy, fetoscopy

Introduction

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a sporadic defect in the diaphragm, is characterized by visceral herniation into the chest. Advances in ultrasonography in prenatal care have facilitated the prenatal diagnosis of CDH. 1 Prenatal detection, which allows referral to experienced tertiary centers, and advances in postnatal care for CDH, including gentle ventilation and circulatory stabilization, have improved the prognoses of fetuses with CDH. 2 , 3 , 4 The survival rate of isolated prenatally diagnosed CDH was 79% in a Japanese multicenter study, and subsequent morbidity remained high. 5 Furthermore, fetuses with heavy visceral herniation, characterized by liver herniation, right‐shifted stomach herniation and small lung size, still have high rates of mortality and morbidity. 6 , 7 , 8 The outcomes of infants with isolated CDH depend on the severity of pulmonary hypoplasia and hypertension, which are derived from lung development in utero. 6 , 9 The limitations of postnatal care for severe CDH has raised fetal intervention.

The rationale for fetal therapy for CDH is to improve the growth of the hypoplastic lung before birth. After attempting some strategies, 10 , 11 fetal tracheal occlusion with a detachable silicon balloon was developed. 12 The initial randomized study by Harrison et al., which used a 5‐mm uterine port with laparotomy, failed to show the superiority of fetal intervention due to a high rate of preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) and preterm delivery. 13 In 2004, Deprest et al. introduced fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) as a minimally invasive procedure performed through a percutaneous approach with a 3.3‐mm cannula. 14 It is suggested that FETO may improve postnatal survival in fetuses with severe CDH. 14 , 15 Several small studies of each institutional experience of FETO have been reported as additional supportive evidence. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19

In 2014, we started a FETO program that was the first trial of FETO in Asia. The aim of the present study was to report the feasibility, safety and outcomes of FETO for the treatment of severe CDH at our center.

Methods

This study was a single‐arm clinical trial registered as UMIN000012395 (http://www.umin.ac.jp). Women carrying fetuses with left‐sided CDH at 26–29 weeks of gestation were evaluated at the National Center for Child Health and Development (NCCHD) in Tokyo, Japan prior to participation in the trial. Entry evaluations included detailed ultrasonography, advanced echocardiography and a karyotype analysis by amniocentesis. The stomach position was determined according to Kitano's grading scale. 8 The observed to expected lung area to head circumference (o/e LHR) was obtained using the tracing method. 7 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed. Patients were scheduled to undergo FETO at the NCCHD in Tokyo. The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics board (No. 507), and the patients provided their written informed consent.

The eligibility criteria were singleton pregnancy, fetus with left‐sided CDH, liver herniation into the chest, Kitano Grade 3 stomach position (>50% of the stomach herniated into the right chest), 8 observed to expected lung area to head circumference (o/e LHR) 7 <45%, no ultrasonographic findings of other anomalies, a normal karyotype, cervical length > 20 mm and no hypertensive disorders. Families of women who met the criteria were extensively counseled by fetal therapy teams of the NCCHD. The timing of FETO differed according to the o/e LHR. FETO was performed at 27–29 weeks of gestation for cases with o/e LHR <25% and at 30–31 weeks of gestation for cases with o/e LHR 25–44%.

The FETO was performed under maternal spinal and epidural anesthesia. Fetal anesthesia and immobilization were performed by percutaneous ultrasound‐guided intramuscular injection of fentanyl (0.01–0.02 mg/kg), atropine (0.01 mg/kg) and vecuronium (0.2 mg/kg). FETO was performed in a procedure similar to that performed in the clinical research consortium. 20 After selecting the best site of entry, a disposable flexible cannula (RCF 11.0 Check‐Flo introducer sets, Cook) with a pyramidal trocar (11650TG, Karl Storz) was percutaneously inserted into the amniotic cavity under ultrasound guidance. External cephalic version and/or amnioinfusion were added to select the best entry site if necessary. A 1.3 mm semi‐rigid fetoscope (11540AA; Karl Storz) within a 3.3‐mm curved sheath (11540KE; Karl Storz) with a channel for inserting a balloon using a delivery catheter (Bal‐tacci‐BDPE‐100 0.9 mm; Balt) was inserted through the cannula. After inserting the fetoscope into the oral cavity of the fetus, the epiglottis and vocal cords were observed. The fetoscope was inserted into the trachea through the vocal cords, a detachable balloon (Goldbal 2; Balt) was delivered and placed in the middle of the trachea between the carina and the vocal cords with the infusion of 0.6 mL of normal saline solution.

Perioperative management with prophylactic tocolysis and antibiotics and postoperative management until balloon removal were provided at the NCCHD. Patients were followed up with ultrasonography every week to evaluate the balloon location, fetal growth, fetal lung size and amniotic fluid volume. Patients were also followed up with electric fetal monitoring (EFM) twice a week. MRI was performed before balloon removal at 33–34 weeks of gestation. Balloon removal in utero was planned at 34 weeks of gestation at the NCCHD. Balloon removal was achieved by puncture under ultrasound guidance or using fetoscope (the same as the balloon insertion technique). A 22 gage PTC needle (Hakko Company) was used for ultrasound‐guided puncture. Using a fetoscope, the balloon was punctured by a sharp stylet (11506P; Karl Storz) with the balloon held by grasping forceps (11510C, Karl Storz) and then the balloon was removed with the fetoscope. If these two methods were not applicable due to pPROM or the onset of labor before elective balloon removal, ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) was performed to remove the balloon before birth.

After balloon removal, standard prenatal management with a weekly ultrasound examination and planned delivery and standard neonatal management of CDH were provided at the NCCHD or at one of four referring perinatal centers (Osaka University Hospital, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Nagoya University Hospital and Kyushu University Hospital). All neonates were treated by the standardized postnatal managements of each institute, including gentle ventilation with high‐frequency oscillatory ventilation. CDH repair was performed after respiratory and circulatory stabilization.

Data on the prenatal ultrasound findings, MRI findings, FETO and balloon removal procedure findings, adverse events of fetal therapy, 21 delivery, CDH repair and neonatal/infantile outcomes were recorded. The primary outcomes were the completion of FETO, the occurrence of severe FETO‐related maternal adverse events, and the survival of the fetus.

Results

A total of 11 cases were enrolled between March 2014 and 2016. The perioperative findings and outcomes of the cases are shown in Table 1. FETO was performed at 27–29 weeks of gestation in 4 cases and at 30–31 weeks of gestation in 7 cases. Balloon insertion was successful in all 11 cases. Five cases required amnioinfusion. In all 10 cases in which balloon removal was required, it was successfully performed at 34–35 weeks of gestation. A fetoscope was used in 6 cases, while 2 cases were performed under ultrasound guidance. In one case (Case 1), balloon puncture was performed under ultrasound guidance on the day after pPROM and the fetus was delivered 4 days later. Two cases with pPROM underwent EXIT due to difficulties in balloon removal under fetoscopy or with ultrasound guidance. In one case (Case 4), balloon puncture was not succeeded under ultrasound guidance at 34 weeks (2 weeks after the occurrence of pPROM). EXIT was performed electively at 35 weeks of gestation. In the other case (Case 8), elective EXIT was performed at 34 weeks of gestation (4 weeks after the occurrence of pPROM).

Table 1.

Perioperative findings and outcomes of 11 patients who underwent FETO

Patient no. Pre‐FETO findings FETO Adverse events Unplug Outcomes
o/e LHR (%) Placental location GA (weeks) Amnioinfusion pPROM (weeks) Fetal death (weeks) GA (weeks) Method GA at birth (weeks) Birth weight (g) Survival at 90 days
1 33 Post 31.6 No 33 No 34.0 US 34.6 2000 Yes
2 27 Post 31.4 No No No 34.3 Fetoscopy 36.4 2182 No
3 32 Ant 31.9 Yes No No 34.6 Fetoscopy 37.4 2802 Yes
4 23 Ant 28.4 Yes 32 No 35.4 EXIT 35.4 2248 No
5 28 Lat 31.7 No No No 34.3 US 38.3 2502 No
6 30 Ant 30.9 Yes No 33 1960
7 27 Ant 30.7 Yes No No 34.7 Fetoscopy 35.7 2010 No
8 20 Ant 27.1 Yes 29 No 34.1 EXIT 34.1 2260 Yes
9 21 Lat 27.6 No No No 34.0 Fetoscopy 37.0 2570 Yes
10 31 Post 31.1 No No No 34.4 Fetoscopy 36.6 2874 Yes
11 20 Post 27.6 No No No 34.6 Fetoscopy 37.7 2880 No

Ant, anterior; EXIT, ex utero intrapartum treatment; FETO, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion; GA, gestational age; Lat, lateral; pPROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes; Post, posterior; US, ultrasound‐guided puncture.

The adverse events of the cases are shown in Table 2. No patients experienced FETO‐related maternal bleeding, placental bleeding or fetal injury. There were no cases with uterine infection, placental abruption or maternal death. One fetus died unexpectedly at 33 weeks of gestation, although EFM showed a reassuring fetal status 1 day before it occurred. Cord strangulation due to a detached amniotic membrane was found after stillbirth (Figure 1). Chorionic membrane separation (CMS) was observed at 32 weeks of gestation. There were 3 cases of CMS and 3 cases of pPROM out of 11 cases.

Table 2.

Summary of adverse events in 11 cases in which FETO was performed

n = 11
Procedure
Maternal bleeding 0
Placental bleeding 0
Fetal injury 0
Pregnancy
CMS 3 (27)
pPROM 3 (27)
Uterine infection 0
Placental abruption 0
Delivery <34 weeks of gestation 0
Survival
Maternal death 0
Fetal death 1 (9)

Data are expressed as the number (%).

CMS, chorionic membrane separation; FETO, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion; pPROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A macroscopic view of the placenta in a case of fetal death (case 6). The arrow indicates cord strangulation by the detached amniotic membrane.

Table 3 shows a summary of the 11 cases in which FETO was performed. The median o/e LHR at entry was 27% (range, 20–33%). The median gestational age at FETO was 30.9 weeks of gestation (range, 27.1–31.7 weeks). The median operation time was 33 min (range, 10–71 min). After FETO, the median o/e LHR at 33–34 weeks of gestation (before balloon removal) was 35% (range, 14–61%). In two cases, Kitano Grade 3 stomach position (>50% of the stomach herniated into the right chest) changed to Grade 2 (≤50% of the stomach herniated into the right chest) after FETO. The median gestational age at delivery was 36.5 weeks of gestation (range, 34.2–38.3 weeks). The median durations of occlusion (between balloon insertion and removal), that between balloon removal and delivery, and that between balloon insertion and delivery were 26 days (range: 17–49 days), 15 days (range 0–28 days) and 43 days (range, 21–66 days), respectively. CDH repair was performed after birth in 6 cases. The survival rate at 90 days of age and the rate of survival to discharge were both 45% (5/11).

Table 3.

Summary of 11 cases in which FETO was performed

n = 11
Characteristics
Maternal age 31 (23, 40)
Primiparity 8 (64)
o/e LHR at entry (%) 27 (20, 33)
Liver up 11 (100)
Kitano G3 stomach position 11 (100)
Anterior placenta 5 (45)
Procedure
Gestational age at FETO (weeks) 30.9 (27.1, 31.7)
Successful balloon insertion 11 (100)
Operation time (min) 33 (10, 71)
Gestational age at balloon removal (n = 10) 34.4 (34.0, 35.4)
Successful balloon removal (n = 10) 10 (100)
Balloon removal by EXIT 2 (20)
Findings after FETO at 33–34 weeks of gestation
o/e LHR (%) 35 (14, 61)
Kitano G3 stomach position 9 (82)
Outcomes
Gestational age at birth (weeks, n = 10) 36.5 (34.2, 38.3)
Duration of occlusion (days, n = 10) 26 (17, 49)
Duration between balloon removal and delivery (days, n = 10) 15 (0, 28)
Duration between balloon insertion and delivery (days, n = 10) 43 (21, 66)
Birth weight (g, n = 10) 2381 (2000, 2880)
Delivery by CS (n = 10) 7 (70)
CDH repair (n = 10) 6 (60)
Survival at 90 days 5 (45)
Survival to discharge 5 (45)

Data are expressed as the median (minimum, maximum) or number (%).

CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; CS, caesarean section; EXIT, ex utero intrapartum treatment; FETO, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion; G, grade; o/e LHR, observed/expected lung to head ratio.

Discussion

In all 11 registered cases, FETO was successfully performed without severe maternal adverse events. In all 10 cases in which balloon removal was required, the balloon was successfully removed and the fetus was delivered at or after 34 weeks of gestation. This study demonstrated that it was feasible to perform FETO at an appropriately prepared fetal therapy center in Japan. This is the first successful FETO trial in Asia. FETO could be offered to women carrying fetuses with severe isolated left‐sided CDH to accelerate fetal lung growth.

The major obstacle to FETO is preterm delivery, which is the strongest determinant of mortality and morbidity in CDH. 15 , 22 Preterm delivery is associated with pPROM which is the most common complication of FETO. 15 It was reported that pPROM occurred in 47% of 210 FETO cases and that the median gestational age at delivery was 35.3 weeks in a large cohort study. 15 In recent small studies from other three groups, the incidence rates of pPROM were 30% in 10 cases, 17 71% in 21 cases 18 and 61% in 28 cases, 19 and the median gestational ages at delivery were 35.4 weeks, 17 34.7 weeks 18 and 34.7 weeks, 19 respectively. In our study, the incidence of pPROM was 27% in 11 cases and the median gestational age of delivery was 36.5 weeks. All 10 cases that were delivered at or after 34 weeks of gestation resulted in live birth.

The survival rate in the initial prospective study of FETO for severe CDH (liver herniation and LHR < 1) was 48% (10/21). 14 The survival rate in a later large similar study of FETO for severe left‐sided CDH was 49% (86/175). 15 In studies of FETO for severe CDH, the survival rates in a Brazilian randomized study, an Italian retrospective study and a Polish prospective study were 50% (10/20), 16 47% (8/17) 18 and 46% (13/28), 19 respectively. Although the survival in a small American study was 80% (8/10), 17 all other studies have suggested that the survival rate among cases in which FETO is performed for severe CDH is around 50%. The survival rate in our study was 45%, which is comparable to previous published data from fetal treatment centers in other countries.

Observed/expected LHR and the liver position are the best‐studied prenatal prognostic predictors of CDH. 7 , 23 , 24 Deprest et al. defined severe CDH as CDH with an o/e LHR < 25% in which the predicted survival rate was <20%, with cases without liver herniation showing better outcomes than those with liver herniation. 24 The criteria that are commonly applied regarding the indication of FETO for severe CDH are left‐sided CDH with o/e LHR < 25% or LHR < 1.0, which is equivalent to o/e LHR < 25%. 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 Some criteria also required liver herniation 14 . 17 The severity of pulmonary hypoplasia in CDH is dynamic and the predictive value of the lung size in the second trimester is limited. 25 The stomach position was proposed as a prognostic factor 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 and we proposed a new grading system for the stomach position that reflects the prognosis of CDH. 8 Later, Cordier et al. also demonstrated the predictive value of the stomach position using a little different grading system. 30 We included liver herniation and stomach position (Kitano Grade 3) in the entry criteria because the stomach position and o/e LHR were independent prognostic factors and the predicted intact survival discharge rate was <20% for patients with these factors. 8

Unexpected fetal death after FETO was reported in 1 of 28 cases 19 and 4 of 210 cases. 15 The details of these five cases were not described and the etiologies were unclear. We had one unexpected fetal death case at 3 weeks after FETO. Umbilical cord strangulation caused by amniotic bands that formed following CMS was suspected as the cause of sudden fetal death. Similar cases have been reported after invasive procedures. 31 , 32 CMS is thought to be a potential lethal finding that can lead to cord strangulation and fetal compromise through amniotic bands. 31 CMS occurred in 20% of patients after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin–twin transfusion syndrome and it was associated with pPROM but was not associated with survival. 33 Although the incidence and the etiology of fetal death after FETO remain unclear, unexpected fetal death after FETO might occur and some cases associated with CMS may have resulted in umbilical cord compromise. Even in singleton pregnancies with spontaneous CMS, fetal death occurred in 6% of cases, with more than half of these deaths occurring due to cord strangulation. 34 CMS after FETO should be recognized as a risk factor for not only pPROM but also for an umbilical cord accident leading to fetal death.

Regarding the timing of FETO, the median gestational age at FETO was 30.9 weeks and more than half of the cases in this study underwent FETO after 30 weeks of gestation. We intended to include cases of severe CDH by using liver herniation and Kitano Grade 3 stomach position as the entry criteria. However, we ultimately followed the method of an ongoing randomized controlled trial in which FETO was performed at 30–31 weeks of gestation for cases with an o/e LHR value of 25–44% to reduce the risk of preterm delivery 35 , 36 (www.totaltrial.ed). Although the performance of FETO prior to 29 weeks of gestation seems to be associated with a better lung response, 37 the optimal timing and duration of tracheal occlusion, that balances the advantages for lung growth and the risk of preterm delivery, is still controversial. The median duration between FETO and delivery was 6 weeks and the gestational age at delivery was 1–2 weeks later in comparison to previous reports. 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 These results could be helpful when considering the timing of FETO.

The present study was associated with several strengths and limitations. The strength of this study was that the feasibility study was conducted for severe CDH cases characterized by Kitano Grade 3 stomach position, which predicted survival independently of o/e LHR. This is the only FETO study in which stomach position was an inclusion criterion. One limitation of this study was that FETO was performed in a relatively small number of cases and there was no expectantly managed control group. A large number of cases with well‐designed controls will be required to evaluate the effectiveness of FETO. An ongoing randomized controlled trial will draw conclusions regarding the usefulness of FETO 35 , 36 (www.totaltrial.ed). The second limitation of the present study was the timing of FETO. Cases with o/e LHR ≥25% underwent FETO at 30–31 weeks of gestation, although these cases were recognized as severe CDH due to Kitano Grade 3 stomach position.

In conclusion, FETO is feasible and was not associated with maternal morbidity in Japan, however, FETO is associated with a potential risk of fetal death in association with CMS. FETO could be offered to women carrying fetuses with severe isolated left‐sided CDH to accelerate fetal lung growth.

Disclosure

None declared.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by grants from the National Center for Child Health and Development of Japan (grant numbers: 24‐2 and 27‐3).

References

  • 1. Gallot D, Boda C, Ughetto S et al Prenatal detection and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A French registry‐based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 276–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gallot D, Coste K, Francannet C et al Antenatal detection and impact on outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A 12‐year experience in Auvergne, France. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125: 202–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bagolan P, Casaccia G, Crescenzi F, Nahom A, Trucchi A, Giorlandino C. Impact of a current treatment protocol on outcome of high‐risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 313–318 discussion −8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Masumoto K, Teshiba R, Esumi G et al Improvement in the outcome of patients with antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia using gentle ventilation and circulatory stabilization. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25: 487–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Okuyama H, Kitano Y, Saito M et al The Japanese experience with prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia based on a multi‐institutional review. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27: 373–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jani J, Keller RL, Benachi A et al Prenatal prediction of survival in isolated left‐sided diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 18–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jani J, Nicolaides KH, Keller RL et al Observed to expected lung area to head circumference ratio in the prediction of survival in fetuses with isolated diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 67–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kitano Y, Okuyama H, Saito M et al Re‐evaluation of stomach position as a simple prognostic factor in fetal left congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A multicenter survey in Japan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 277–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kluth D, Tenbrinck R, von Ekesparre M , et al The Natural history of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and pulmonary hypoplasia in the embryo. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28: 456–62; discussion 62–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Harrison MR, Mychaliska GB, Albanese CT , et al Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero IX: Fetuses with poor prognosis (liver herniation and low lung‐to‐head ratio) can be saved by fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 1017–22; discussion 22–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, Adzick NS. Treatment of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia by fetal tracheal occlusion: Clinical experience with fifteen cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1059–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Harrison MR, Albanese CT, Hawgood SB et al Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion by means of detachable balloon for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 730–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB et al A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1916–1924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Deprest J, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jani JC, Nicolaides KH, Gratacos E et al Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 304–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ruano R, Yoshisaki CT, da Silva MM et al A randomized controlled trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion versus postnatal management of severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Belfort MA, Olutoye OO, Cass DL et al Feasibility and outcomes of Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe left diaphragmatic hernia. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 20–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Persico N, Fabietti I, Ciralli F et al Fetoscopic Endoluminal tracheal occlusion in Fetuses with severe diaphragmatic hernia: A three‐year single‐Center experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2017; 41: 215–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kosinski P, Wielgos M. Foetoscopic endotracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe isolated left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Single center polish experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 2521–2526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Van der Veeken L, Russo FM, De Catte L et al Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and reestablishment of fetal airways for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Gynecol Surg 2018; 15: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Takahashi Y, Sago H, Ishii K, Murakoshi T, Murotsuki J, Nakata M. New terminology for dverse events of fetal therapy: Re‐evaluation of the thoraco‐amniotic shunting in a Japanese study. J Obstet Gynecol Res 2019; 45: 251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Doné E, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH et al Predictors of neonatal morbidity in fetuses with severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing fetoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Doné E, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T et al Prenatal diagnosis, prediction of outcome and in utero therapy of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 581–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Deprest JA, Flemmer AW, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K. Antenatal prediction of lung volume and in‐utero treatment by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion in severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14: 8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Coleman A, Phithakwatchara N, Shaaban A et al Fetal lung growth represented by longitudinal changes in MRI‐derived fetal lung volume parameters predicts survival in isolated left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 160–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Burge DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV. Could the stomach site help predict outcome in babies with left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia diagnosed antenatally? J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 567–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Goodfellow T, Hyde I, Burge DM, Freeman NV. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: The prognostic significance of the site of the stomach. Br J Radiol 1987; 60: 993–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hatch EI Jr, Kendall J, Blumhagen J. Stomach position as an in utero predictor of neonatal outcome in left‐sided diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27: 778–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kitano Y, Nakagawa S, Kuroda T et al Liver position in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia retains a prognostic value in the era of lung‐protective strategy. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: 1827–1832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cordier AG, Jani JC, Cannie MM et al Stomach position in prediction of survival in left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia with or without fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 155–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Graf JL, Bealer JF, Gibbs DL, Adzick NS, Harrison MR. Chorioamniotic membrane separation: A potentially lethal finding. Fetal Diagn Ther 1997; 12: 81–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lewi L, Hanssens M, Spitz B, Deprest J. Complete chorioamniotic membrane separation. Case report and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19: 78–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Egawa M, Hayashi S, Yang L, Sakamoto N, Sago H. Chorioamniotic membrane separation after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin‐twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 89–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhu KH, Young BC, Shamshirsaz AA et al Outcomes of prenatally diagnosed spontaneous chorioamniotic membrane separation in singleton pregnancies: A systematic review of case series and case reports. Prenat Diagn 2020; 10.1002/pd.5767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dekoninck P, Gratacos E, Van Mieghem T et al Results of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia and the set up of the randomized controlled TOTAL trial. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 619–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Deprest J, Brady P, Nicolaides K et al Prenatal management of the fetus with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the era of the TOTAL trial. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 338–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cannie MM, Jani JC, De Keyzer F, Allegaert K, Dymarkowski S, Deprest J. Evidence and patterns in lung response after fetal tracheal occlusion: Clinical controlled study. Radiology 2009; 252: 526–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES