Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242438

Deficiency of mannose-binding lectin is a risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in a natural history cohort of people living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Thailand

Kunio Yanagisawa 1,2,#, Nuanjun Wichukchinda 3,#, Naho Tsuchiya 4, Michio Yasunami 5, Archawin Rojanawiwat 3, Hidenori Tanaka 6, Hiroh Saji 6, Yoshiyuki Ogawa 1, Hiroshi Handa 1, Panita Pathipvanich 7, Koya Ariyoshi 8,*, Pathom Sawanpanyalert 3,¤
Editor: Aftab A Ansari9
PMCID: PMC7757797  PMID: 33362211

Abstract

Background

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) plays a pivotal role in innate immunity; however, its impact on susceptibility to opportunistic infections (OIs) has not yet been examined in a natural history cohort of people living with HIV/AIDS.

Methods

We used archived samples to analyze the association between MBL expression types and risk of major OIs including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), cryptococcosis, talaromycosis, toxoplasmosis, and tuberculosis in a prospective cohort in Northern Thailand conducted from 1 July 2000 to 15 October 2002 before the national antiretroviral treatment programme was launched.

Results

Of 632 patients, PCP was diagnosed in 96 (15.2%) patients, including 45 patients with new episodes during the follow-up period (1006.5 person-years). The total history of PCP was significantly associated with low MBL expression type: high/intermediate (81/587, 13.8%), low (10/33, 30.3%) and deficient (5/12, 41.7%) (p = 0.001), whereas the history of other OIs showed no relation with any MBL expression type. Kaplan–Meier analysis (n = 569; log-rank p = 0.011) and Cox’s proportional hazards model revealed that deficient genotype dramatically increased the risk of PCP, which is independent upon sex, age, CD4 count, HIV-1 viral load and hepatitis B and C status (adjusted hazard ratio 7.93, 95% confidence interval 2.19–28.67, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Deficiency of MBL expression is a strong risk factor determining the incidence of PCP but not other major OIs.

Introduction

Among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Asia, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is one of the most frequent opportunistic infections (OIs) in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining diseases [14]. A cut-off level of <200 cells/μl for CD4 cell counts is well established as a risk factor for PCP [5]; therefore, CD4 cells probably play a pivotal role in the defense against P. jirovecii [6]. However, the incidence of PCP differs in various populations, such as a lower incidence in patients originating from sub-Saharan Africa compared with patients from Western origin [7], and CD4 cell counts in HIV patients are broadly distributed at the onset of PCP in the real world [8]. This variability raises the possibility that risk factors, e.g., host factors and/or causative pathogens, other than CD4 cell counts contribute to the development of PCP.

The P. jirovecii cell wall contains abundant glycoproteins including β-D glucan and mannose [6], and host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) bind these glycoproteins via carbohydrates containing a C-type lectin-like domain, so-called C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) [9, 10]. They can be found as soluble forms and/or transmembrane receptors of various immune cells including macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils. RPRs/CLRs induce cytokine release and phagocytosis following interaction with fungus [9, 10]. Recently, the contributions of genetic variation of PRRs/CLRs to susceptibility to fungal infections have been reported [9, 10]. We speculate these genetic host factors play an important role in the development of PCP.

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is one of the well-studied soluble PRRs/CLRs, which plays a pivotal role in innate immunity against fungus [11]. The detailed protective mechanism is based on direct opsonization and activation of the complement system via the mannose-associated serine protease, which is involved in the lectin pathway [1113]. Binding of MBL to P. jirovecii is followed by the activation of respiratory bursts and control of fungal spread [14]. We previously showed that supplementation of MBL enhances phagocytic reactions by macrophages in vitro [8]. However, the association between genetic variations in MBL and susceptibility to PCP has not yet been fully clarified.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter region (rs11003125, H/L and rs7096206, X/Y), 5′-untranslated region (UTR) (rs7095891, P/Q) and exon 1 (rs1800450, B; rs1800451, C; and rs5030737, D) of MBL2 gene are well known to influence MBL gene expression and structure [13]. We previously reported the association between MBL2 genotypes and prevalence of PCP in HIV-infected patients in a cross-sectional observation of 53 patients in Japan [8]. However, information about polymorphisms and PRRs/CLRs affecting Pneumocystis recognition remain limited and their impact on susceptibility to AIDS-defining OIs has not been evaluated in a natural history cohort of patients with HIV/AIDS.

Previously, an observational cohort study was conducted at the HIV Clinic, Day Care Center (DCC) of Lampang Hospital in Northern Thailand, called the Lampang HIV cohort [1, 1520]. The DCC was established to provide care and support for HIV-infected patients. Patient recruitment started on July 6, 2000, and the follow-up was concluded at the date of induction of antiretroviral therapy (ART), patient death, or the last visit in October 2004.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the impact of MBL expression type defined by MBL2 genotypes on the risk of developing HIV/AIDS-related OIs, especially PCP, in a natural history HIV cohort in northern Thailand.

Material and methods

Design and population

In total, 755 ART naïve patients recruited in the previously descrived Lampang HIV natural history cohort were re-analyzed [21]. Briefly the recruitment of this cohort was done from 1 July 2000 to 15 October 2002 before the national antiretroviral treatment programme was launched. All adult (aged > 18 years) HIV-infected individuals attending the HIV clinic who were ART-naïve at the first visit were approached. Clinical data of individuals, who were followed up for at least two time points, were used for the current longitudinal analysis in our group [22]. Baseline clinical data were collected when participants were registered in this cohort. The history of OIs was noted within the follow-up period. The diagnosis of OIs was based on laboratory data and typical findings from radiological images, following the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV infection in children and adults. (Sixth edition); 2000 [23].

The prophylactic and therapeutic interventions agains OIs were based on the same guidelines [23]. Briefly, for primary prophylaxis, patients with a CD4 count <200/μl were given two double-strength tablets of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX; 80 mg TMP and 400 mg SMX) orally once daily for prophylaxis against PCP. The same regimen was administered to prevent toxoplasmosis when the CD4 count was <100 /μl. Fluconazole 200 mg orally once daily or 400 mg once a week was given for prophylaxis against cryptococcosis when the CD4 cell count was <100 /μlL. No primary prophylaxis for TB or Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection was given in this study.

Experimental procedures

MBL2 genotyping

MBL2 genotyping was performed by using a multiplexed microsphere suspension array-based platform, Luminex xMAP™, as previously described [24]. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a standard phenol-chloroform method, and the MBL2 promoter region and 5′-UTR (-619, -290, and -66), a 677-bp fragment was amplified with 5′ biotinylated primers and then directly hybridized with six oligonucleotide probes specific for each allele of the corresponding biallelic SNP, which was immobilized on the microsphere beads. MBL2 exon 1 haplotypes were determined by PCR-preferential homoduplex formation assay, in which unlabeled PCR products were hybridized with eight double-labeled (biotin and specific capture sequence) 65-bp double-stranded standards, corresponding to each of the theoretically possible exon 1 cdn52-cdn54-cdn57 haplotypes: CGG, CAG, TGG, CGA, CAA, TAG, TAA, and TGA. These SNPs comprise seven established haplotypes: HYPA, LYQA, LYPA, LXPA, HYPD, LYPB, and LYQC.

There are no universal definitions of category based on MBL2 genotype associated with plasma MBL concentrations and functional complement activity. In this study, we defined four MBL expression types: deficient, low, intermediate and high, which based on the classification reported by Chalmers et al. [25] (Table 1). We modified their classification because "low" defined by them includes both complete deficiency and relatively low expression; therefore, we distinguished and defined them as "deficient" and "low".

Table 1. Definition of MBL expression type.
Haplotype Genotype Combination MBL expression typea
HYPD/LYQC/LYPB O YO/YO deficient
LXPA XA XA/YO low
LYPA/LYQA YA YA/YO intermediate
HYPA YA XA/XA high
YA/XA high
YA/YA high

aMBL expression type was defined by abbreviated genotypes and combinations based on each haplotype.

Measurements of plasma MBL concentrations

To confirm the validation of MBL expressions described above, we tested 273 stored samples; selection process was restricted by the availability of stored plasma and samples were more preferentially selected from patients with a history of PCP and patients with low MBL expression type rather than high MBL expression type. These were linked concentrations to MBL2 genotype of each patient. Plasma MBL concentrations were determined using the MBL Oligomer ELISA kit (BioPorto Diagnostics, Hellerup, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the medians of continuous variables. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and to assess the significance of deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were performed to estimate the risk of PCP during the follow-up period. Cox’s proportional hazards models were performed to analyze the risk of PCP as the dependent variable. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined, and p<0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 25 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) and STATA version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) were used to perform analyses.

Ethical statements

This study was approved by the Gunma University Ethical Review Board for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (#150018, March 16, 2016). Furthermore, the pilot study registered at the Thai National Institute of Health received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Institute for Development of Human Research Protections for “studies of host genetic, immunological, virological and co-infection factors associating with HIV/AIDS”. This study is the secondary use of the unlinked anonymous sample collected in Lampang HIV cohort, and the authors does not obtain the information that can identify an individual before the analysis of data.

Results

In total, 632 individuals with the median (IQR) follow-up period of 471.5 (187.5–913) days were recorded during the 1006.5 person-years of observation. We successfully determined MBL2 genotypes of 632 individuals and found that the majority (92.9%) of individuals had high/intermediate (69.6%/23.3%) MBL expression, and the others had low (5.2%) and deficient (1.9%) MBL expression. All studied SNPs were in HWE. Ninety-six (15.2%) patients had a past and/or present history of PCP: 60 (9.5%) patients at the time of recruitment and an additional 45 (7.1%) patients during the follow-up period. Nine patients developed PCP twice before and after the recruitment. The total history of PCP (n = 96) was significantly associated with MBL expression type (p = 0.001): 81 of 587 (13.9%) as high/intermediate vs 10 of 33 (30.3%) as low and 5 of 12 (41.7%) as deficient (Table 2). However, the total histories (before and/or after the recruitment) of other major OIs including cryptococcosis, talaromycosis, toxoplasmosis, and tuberculosis showed no relation with any MBL expression type (Table 2). There were no differences in the history of PCP between high and intermediate MBL expression types.

Table 2. MBL expression type and characteristics of all study patients.

Total deficient low high+int p
(n = 632) (n = 12) (n = 33) (n = 587)
100.0% 1.9% 5.2% 92.9% 0.409
Male sex 265 (41.9%) 7(58.3%) 1 (33.3%) 247(42,1%) 0.311
Age (range) 33 (15–63) 33(28–47) 33 (18–60) 33(15–63) 0.732
CD4+ cell count/μl 154 241 90 156 0.518
(range) (0–1191) (10–412) (0–762) (0–1191)
log10VL (copies/ml) 5.19 4.63 5.23 5.19 0.858
(range) (2.60–6.72) (2.60–6.28) (2.60–6.07) (2.60–6.72)
PCP 96 (15.2%) 5(41.7%) 10 (30.3%) 81(13.8%) 0.001
Cryptococcosis 83 (13.2%) 1(8.3%) 6 (18.2%) 76(13.0%) 0.609
Talaromycosis 49 (7.8%) 0(0.0%) 2 (4.1%) 47(8.0%) 0.550
Toxoplasmosis 30 (4.8%) 1(8.3%) 3 (9.1%) 26(4.5%) 0.4.4
Tuberculosis 118 (18.7%) 3(25.0%) 5 (15.2%) 110(18.8%) 0.745
HBsAg 70(11.2%) 3(25.0%) 4(12.1%) 63(10.9%) 0.304
HCVAb 24(3.8%) 1(8.3%) 0(0.0%) 23(4.0%) 0.368

Abbreviations: high+int, high and intermediate; VL, HIV-RNA viral load; PCP, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the medians of continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.

†statistically significant (p<0.05).

New incidences of PCP episodes were plotted according to MBL expression type by Kaplan–Meier analysis (Fig 1). The deficient expression group was significantly associated with the incidence of PCP compared to low and high/intermediate group (n = 569, log-rank, p = 0.011, Fig 1A). Furthermore, the association was remained either in subgroup of CD4<200/μl or ≧200/μl (n = 293 and 274, log-rank, p = 0.030 and 0.021, respectively, Fig 1B and 1C) although patients with baseline CD4<200/μl had been taken TMP/SMX, it can be a strong confounder of PCP onset.

Fig 1. Cumulative probability curves of PCP during follow-up periods.

Fig 1

Kaplan–Meier curves for registered Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (PCP) patients. (a) Total patients (n = 569), (b) baseline CD4 count <200/μl (n = 293), and (c) baseline CD4 count ≧200/μl (n = 274). Dashed line indicates deficient expression type of Mannose-binding Lectin (MBL), dotted line indicates low and solid line indicates high/intermediate MBL expression types combined. The log-rank test was used to compare group.

Univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards models were fitted to identify predictors of PCP. Covariates included sex, age, CD4 count, viral load (log10 VL), and MBL expression type. CD4 count was also categorized into ≧200/μl or <200/μl in consideration of PCP prophylaxis by TMP/SMX. PCP cases were significantly associated with deficient type of MBL expression and CD4 count <200/μl, independent of sex, age, and log 10VL (aHR 7.93, 95% CI 2.19–28.67, p = 0.002; aHR 3.57, 95% CI 1.51–8.45, p = 0.004, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards models.

n = 567 Crude HR 95% CI p aHR 95% CI p
Male sex 1.26 0.63–2.50 0.512 0.82 0.38–1.76 0.604
Age 0.96 0.91–1.01 0.143 0.94 0.89–1.00 0.058
CD4 count (/μl) <200 3.31 1.64–6.66 0.001 3.57 1.51–8.45 0.004
log10VL (copies/ml) 1.70 1.09–2.65 0.020 1.26 0.75–2.10 0.379
MBL expression type deficient 4.90 1.50–16.08 0.009 7.93 2.19–28.67 0.002
low 1.86 0.57–6.10 0.305 1.52 0.45–5.15 0.502
HBsAg 1.89 0.73–4.90 0.192 1.48 0.53–4.08 0.452
HCVAb 1.41 0.34–5.88 0.640 1.60 0.36–7.11 0.534

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; VL, HIV RNA viral load

*1 referred to CD4≧200

*2 referred to intermediate and high combined.

†statistically significant (p<0.05).

Distributions of MBL concentrations measured in plasma samples (n = 273) are shown in Fig 2. Median plasma concentrations were well associated with the each MBL expression type: 0.0 ng/ml in deficient, 25.3 ng/ml in low, 612.2 ng/ml in intermediate, and 2954.7 ng/ml in high with significant differences between two pairs or whole four types in each other (Fig 2, p<0.001). Therefore, the validity of MBL2 genotypes was confirmed with the phenotypes in this study.

Fig 2. Box plots of plasma MBL concentrations of patients (n = 273) according to MBL expression type.

Fig 2

Box plots of plasma Mannose-binding Lectin (MBL) concentrations of patients (n = 273) according to MBL expression type. The Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for analyzing the differences of plasma MBL concentrations in each MBL expression type.

Discussion

Little has been known about host genetic polymorphisms affecting its sensitivity against PCP other than our previous study in limited number of Japanese populations [8, 10]. To our knowledge, this presenting data is the first cohort study demonstrating that MBL expression type defined by MBL2 genotypes are significantly associated with the incidence of PCP. A recent study performed in a large cohort in Switzerland did not observe an association between MBL expression and PCP in patients whose CD4 cell counts were <200 cells/μl [26]. The authors also showed that CD4 cell count is one of the strongest risk factors of PCP. In contrast, our study showed that deficient MBL expression can be a strong risk of PCP in all followed-up patients as well as the suppression of CD4 cells<200/μl. Although the analyzed patients with CD4 <200/μl were on PCP prophylaxis, their clinical course was not influenced by ART, because the presenting study applied archive samples and data collected before ART was widely introduced in northern Thailand [21]. For this reason, we believe that our finding mirrors the real impact of MBL genetic variation on the host susceptibility to PCP, which may answer our primary question of why some people with advanced HIV infection develop PCP while others do not.

Our results indicate only PCP incidence was associated with MBL expression type, whereas other representative OIs such as cryptococcosis, talaromycosis, toxoplasmosis, and tuberculosis were not. This may contradict a previous study that showed an association between MBL2 genotype and incidence of fungal infections, including Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, and Candida infections [11]. It has been reported that a number of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on the surface of fungi, such as β-D glucan, O/N-linked mannan, chitin, DNA and RNA, have interactions with PRRs of host cells [9]. MBL binds glycosylated ligands of PAMPs with its carbohydrate recognition domain [27]. Our study demonstrated the relation of MBL and Pneumocystis among numbers of combinations between host PRRs and fungal PAMPs based on the analysis of clinical outcomes.

Definitions of MBL2 genotype and/or MBL expression type have not yet been standardized. The "low" classification defined by Chalmers et al. [25] includes both a complete deficiency of MBL and relatively low expression. If we analyzed our data based on their classification, the association between incidence of PCP and “low” type was disappeared in subgroup of CD4<50/μl (S1 Fig). Furthermore, the classification defined by Ou et al. (including “deficient/low/high”, which is equivalent to “low/intermediate/high” described above), seems that homogenous combination of mutant haplotype (YO/YO, refer to Table 1) and heterogenous (XA/YO) were confused into same classification to “deficient” [28]. Therefore, we remade the classification by distinguishing deficient and low expression which means homogenous haplotype (YO/YO) or heterogenous (XA/YO). The validity of these modified classification was verified by the measurement of plasma MBL concentration with gradual increasing of them according to the expression types. However, considerable overlap in plasma MBL concentration was observed in the presence or absence of PCP (S2 Fig), although MBL concentrations were clearly differentiated by expression type. These findings suggest there are other unknown factors influencing the incidence of PCP, which overcome the influence of MBL when patients are highly immunosuppressed.

Also, we have to consider racial differences can influence host defense mechanisms based on genotype heterogeneity [29, 30]. It has been reported that a number of major SNPs are associated with susceptibility of fungal infections and diseases, including MBL2, TLR1/4/6/9, CARD9, CXCL2, DECTIN1, IL4/10/15/2 [31], and HLA [30]. Therefore, molecular interactions between pathogens and hosts should be discussed in consideration of the geographical area where the study was performed. We confirmed the associations between MBL and PCP both in Japanese [8] and Thai populations; thus, this biological mechanism appears to be true in Asian populations. Further study is warranted to demonstrate this association in Africa, where the incidence of PCP is lower [7].

Several limitations were included in this study. Firstly, we did not investigate genetic variations of other PRRs associated with fungal infections in this study. Furthermore, the possibilities of differences in Pneumocystis species or in pattern of surface molecules in Japan and Thailand populations were not investigated. However, the genetic diversity of Pneumocystis was limited in a multicenter study conducted in Europe [32]. Although MBL protein synthesis and release can be affected by liver function, levels of interleukin-6, growth and thyroid hormones [33], these data were not available. However, we have successfully shown the risk of deficient and low MBL expression type by Cox's proportional hazards models in consideration with seropositivity of HBV and HCV. It may partially reflect the confounders associated with liver function. Finally, we could not evaluate the association between MBL phenotype and the onset of other OIs. Also, we could not confirm the changes in plasma MBL concentrations between different collection days, because all of plasma samples were not available.

In summary, we firstly showed that deficiency of MBL expression is a strong risk factor determining the incidence of PCP, but not other major OIs, in HIV natural history cohort.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Cumulative probability curves of PCP during follow-up periods (CD4<50/μl) his Kaplan-Meire curve shows the cumulative provability of PCP, if they are categorized by three MBL expression type (low/intermediate/high) and selected by their CD4 cells <50/μl (n = 171).

The solid line means “low”, and dashed line means intermediate and high combined. The difference between “low “vs “int + high” were analyzed by log-rank test; however, there were no significance (p = 0.44).

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Box plots of plasma MBL concentrations with or without PCP during the follow-up period (n = 231).

MBL concentrations were plotted in two group of patients if they have a new episode of PCP (n = 19, plasma MBL was 0.0–4683.4/ng/ml, median 2008.9 ng/ml) or not (n = 212, 0.0–14213.3, median 2057.8 ng/ml) during the follow-up period. The median of each two group was tested by Mann-Whilney U test; however, there were no significance (p = 0.679).

(DOCX)

S1 Dataset

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Kunihiko Hayashi for providing kind assistance with statistical analysis. We also thank Ms. Maneeratt for providing support during the visit and research meeting in Thailand.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

KY was financially supported by the grant of Joint Usage/Research Center on Tropical Diseases, Nagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine, Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) and Thai Ministry of Public Health for this work (2016-Ippan-4). http://www.tm.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/nekken/joint/files/h28reportbook.pdf.

References

  • 1.Gangcuangco LMA, Sawada I, Tsuchiya N, Do CD, Pham TTT, Rojanawiwat A, et al. Regional Differences in the Prevalence of Major Opportunistic Infections among Antiretroviral-Naïve Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients in Japan, Northern Thailand, Northern Vietnam, and the Philippines. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(1):49–56. 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Katano H, Hishima T, Mochizuki M, Kodama Y, Oyaizu N, Ota Y, et al. The prevalence of opportunistic infections and malignancies in autopsied patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in Japan. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:229 Epub 2014/04/29. 10.1186/1471-2334-14-229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou J, Kumarasamy N, Ditangco R, Kamarulzaman A, Lee CK, Li PC, et al. The TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database: baseline and retrospective data. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(2):174–9. 10.1097/01.qai.0000145351.96815.d5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mocroft A, Youle M, Phillips AN, Halai R, Easterbrook P, Johnson MA, et al. The incidence of AIDS-defining illnesses in 4883 patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Royal Free/Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals Collaborative Group. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(5):491–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Masur H, Ognibene FP, Yarchoan R, Shelhamer JH, Baird BF, Travis W, et al. CD4 counts as predictors of opportunistic pneumonias in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111(3):223–31. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas CF, Limper AH. Current insights into the biology and pathogenesis of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(4):298–308. nrmicro1621 [pii], 10.1038/nrmicro1621 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schoffelen AF, van Lelyveld SF, Barth RE, Gras L, de Wolf F, Netea MG, et al. Lower incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia among Africans in the Netherlands host or environmental factors? AIDS. 2013;27(7):1179–84. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835e2c90 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yanagisawa K, Ogawa Y, Uchiumi H, Gohda F, Mawatari M, Ishizaki T, et al. Gene polymorphisms of mannose-binding lectin confer susceptibility to Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV-infected patients. J Infect Chemother. 2015. 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.07.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Romani L. Immunity to fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(4):275–88. Epub 2011/03/11. 10.1038/nri2939 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goyal S, Castrillón-Betancur JC, Klaile E, Slevogt H. The Interaction of Human Pathogenic Fungi With C-Type Lectin Receptors. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1261 Epub 2018/06/04. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eisen DP, Minchinton RM. Impact of mannose-binding lectin on susceptibility to infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(11):1496–505. CID31433 [pii], 10.1086/379324 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kerrigan AM, Brown GD. C-type lectins and phagocytosis. Immunobiology. 2009;214(7):562–75. S0171-2985(08)00142-3 [pii], 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garred P, Larsen F, Seyfarth J, Fujita R, Madsen HO. Mannose-binding lectin and its genetic variants. Genes Immun. 2006;7(2):85–94. 6364283 [pii], 10.1038/sj.gene.6364283 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koziel H, Li X, Armstrong MY, Richards FF, Rose RM. Alveolar macrophages from human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons demonstrate impaired oxidative burst response to Pneumocystis carinii in vitro. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;23(4):452–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pathipvanich P, Ariyoshi K, Rojanawiwat A, Wongchoosie S, Yingseree P, Yoshiike K, et al. Survival benefit from non-highly active antiretroviral therapy in a resource-constrained setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32(2):157–60. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pathipvanich P, Rojanawiwat A, Ariyoshi K, Miura T, Pumpradit W, Wongchoosie S, et al. Mortality analysis of HIV-1 infected patients for prioritizing antiretroviral drug therapy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87(8):951–4. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saeng-aroon S, Tsuchiya N, Auwanit W, Ayuthaya PI, Pathipvanich P, Sawanpanyalert P, et al. Drug-resistant mutation patterns in CRF01_AE cases that failed d4T+3TC+nevirapine fixed-dosed, combination treatment: Follow-up study from the Lampang cohort. Antiviral Res. 2010;87(1):22–9. Epub 2010/04/09. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.04.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsuchiya N, Pathipvanich P, Wichukchinda N, Rojanawiwat A, Auwanit W, Ariyoshi K, et al. Incidence and predictors of regimen-modification from first-line antiretroviral therapy in Thailand: a cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:565 Epub 2014/10/30. 10.1186/s12879-014-0565-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mori M, Wichukchinda N, Miyahara R, Rojanawiwat A, Pathipvanich P, Tsuchiya N, et al. The effect of KIR2D-HLA-C receptor-ligand interactions on clinical outcome in a HIV-1 CRF01_AE-infected Thai population. AIDS. 2015;29(13):1607–15. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000747 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mori M, Wichukchinda N, Miyahara R, Rojanawiwat A, Pathipvanich P, Miura T, et al. Impact of HLA Allele-KIR Pairs on Disease Outcome in HIV-Infected Thai Population. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;78(3):356–61. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001676 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsuchiya N, Pathipvanich P, Rojanawiwat A, Wichukchinda N, Koga I, Koga M, et al. Chronic hepatitis B and C co-infection increased all-cause mortality in HAART-naive HIV patients in Northern Thailand. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(9):1840–8. Epub 2012/11/01. 10.1017/S0950268812002397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rojanawiwat A, Tsuchiya N, Pathipvanich P, Pumpradit W, Schmidt WP, Honda S, et al. Impact of the National Access to Antiretroviral Program on the incidence of opportunistic infections in Thailand. Int Health. 2011;3(2):101–7. 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.12.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moongtui W, Gauthier DK, Turner JG. Using peer feedback to improve handwashing and glove usage among Thai health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(5):365–9. 10.1067/mic.2000.107885 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ivanova M, Ruiqing J, Matsushita M, Ogawa T, Kawai S, Ochiai N, et al. MBL2 single nucleotide polymorphism diversity among four ethnic groups as revealed by a bead-based liquid array profiling. Hum Immunol. 2008;69(12):877–84. Epub 2008/10/24. 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.09.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chalmers JD, McHugh BJ, Doherty C, Smith MP, Govan JR, Kilpatrick DC, et al. Mannose-binding lectin deficiency and disease severity in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(3):224–32. Epub 2013/01/28. 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70001-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wójtowicz A, Bibert S, Taffé P, Bernasconi E, Furrer H, Günthard HF, et al. IL-4 polymorphism influences susceptibility to Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in HIV-positive patients. AIDS. 2019;33(11):1719–27. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ezekowitz RA. Role of the mannose-binding lectin in innate immunity. J Infect Dis. 2003;187 Suppl 2:S335–9. 10.1086/374746 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ou XT, Wu JQ, Zhu LP, Guan M, Xu B, Hu XP, et al. Genotypes coding for mannose-binding lectin deficiency correlated with cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-uninfected Chinese patients. J Infect Dis. 2011;203(11):1686–91. jir152 [pii], 10.1093/infdis/jir152 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Quach H, Rotival M, Pothlichet J, Loh YE, Dannemann M, Zidane N, et al. Genetic Adaptation and Neandertal Admixture Shaped the Immune System of Human Populations. Cell. 2016;167(3):643–56.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tian C, Hromatka BS, Kiefer AK, Eriksson N, Noble SM, Tung JY, et al. Genome-wide association and HLA region fine-mapping studies identify susceptibility loci for multiple common infections. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):599 Epub 2017/09/19. 10.1038/s41467-017-00257-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carvalho A, Cunha C, Pasqualotto AC, Pitzurra L, Denning DW, Romani L. Genetic variability of innate immunity impacts human susceptibility to fungal diseases. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(6):e460–8. Epub 2009/10/13. 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.06.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alanio A, Gits-Muselli M, Guigue N, Desnos-Ollivier M, Calderon EJ, Di Cave D, et al. Diversity of Pneumocystis jirovecii Across Europe: A Multicentre Observational Study. EBioMedicine. 2017;22:155–63. Epub 2017/06/29. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.06.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sørensen CM, Hansen TK, Steffensen R, Jensenius JC, Thiel S. Hormonal regulation of mannan-binding lectin synthesis in hepatocytes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;145(1):173–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03101.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Aftab A Ansari

11 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-20525

Association between Mannose-binding Lectin Expression and Risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in People Living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Thailand

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yanagisawa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please pay close attention to the concerns of reviewer # 1 with regards to statistical analysis and the role of other confounders. There is also a minor issue raised by reviewer # 2 that you and your co-authors should be able to readily address. This is a nice and well performed study.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 25 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Aftab A. Ansari, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide the following details about the stored biological samples used in your study:

(1) source of the samples

(2) whether the samples were completely de-identified before researchers accessed the samples.

We note that you state that "stored samples derived from the Lampang HIV cohort in “unlinked anonymous” pattern can be used in subsequent analyses without requiring additional ethical approval." Please clarify whether the samples were "unlinked anonymous" before you accessed them. Please add this information to the methods section and your ethics statement in your online submission form.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Yanagisawa and colleagues describes the association between mannose-binding lectin and susceptibility to Pneumocystis jiroveccii pneumonia (PCP) in HIV+ ART-naive patients in Northern Thailand. PCP was diagnosed in 15% of patients and the authors report MBL expression to be associated with PCP onset in patients with CD4 counts > 50 /ul.

The study is straightforward, and the data are well presented. However, the Kaplan Meir curves showing decreased likelihood of PCP over time is confusing. Also, the lower risk of PCP incidence in patients with CD4 counts < 50/ul is unclear. Were other important confounders not accounted for such as susceptibility to other OIs? Another caveat is that presence of coinfections impacting liver function could impact MBL levels and this confounder was not controlled for.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript submitted by Yanagisawa and colleagues addresses the role of mannose binding lectin to susceptibility to Pneumocystis jirovecii infection. Specifically, they address the role of genotypes associated with MBL deficiency in the development of PCP in HIV infected subjects. The link between MBL deficiency and infection is an important subject and of significant interest to a broad array of biomedical and public health researchers. Susceptibility to PCP among HIV infected subjects is well-known and provides an opportunity to investigate this important question.

The authors utilize a special cohort of HIV infected subjects from Northern Thailand for which samples were taken in a time period prior to the administration of ART. Such samples are rare and valuable.

The authors carry out an MBL genotypic analysis of samples from the cohort, that allows them to identify subjects with high, intermediate and low MBL genotypes. This analysis is validated by measuring MBL levels in a subset of subjects by direct measurement of MBL. The association is strong. This analysis allows for identification of any correlations between PCP and MBL genotype.

Such an analysis is however nontrivial. HIV infected subjects encompass a range of immunocompetence, which itself can have a profound impact on opportunistic infection. The authors correctly address this variable by evaluating the relationship between PCP, MBL genotype and blood CD4 counts. CD4 counts are a strong measure of immune dysfunction in HIV infected subject and is significantly associated with PCP. Indeed, this variable has the potential to mask any effect of MBL genotype on susceptibility. In fact, for subjects with a CD4 count <50 the association between MBL genotype and PCP infection was lost. However, for subjects with CD4 counts <200 they identified strong and convincing correlation between PCP and genotypes associated with MBL deficiency.

I found this manuscript to be clearly presented. It was well organized and a pleasure to read. The subject is an interesting one. Numerous questions remain in relation to MBL deficiency and infection. I expect that these researchers will continue to contribute to this subject area.

The only suggestion that I might offer involves the distinction between MBL low genotypes and MBL deficiency. Although the authors demonstrate a very strong correlation between genotype and deficiency, their analysis of susceptibility to PCP is with the genotype, not the phenotype. Perhaps they could make this distinction in their concluding remarks.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOSE ONE Review.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242438.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Oct 2020

To reviewer #1:

“The manuscript by Yanagisawa and colleagues describes the association between mannose-binding lectin and susceptibility to Pneumocystis jiroveccii pneumonia (PCP) in HIV+ ART-naive patients in Northern Thailand. PCP was diagnosed in 15% of patients and the authors report MBL expression to be associated with PCP onset in patients with CD4 counts > 50 /ul. The study is straightforward, and the data are well presented. However, the Kaplan Meir curves showing decreased likelihood of PCP over time is confusing. “

Thank you for your suggestion. The Y-axis of Kaplan-Meier curves in Fig1 in the first manuscript may give misunderstanding that the incidence of the PCP looks to be decreased over time as you mentioned. In the revised manuscript, we modified Fig1. that Y-axis show the increase of PCP incidence.

“Also, the lower risk of PCP incidence in patients with CD4 counts < 50/ul is unclear. ”

Thank you for your suggestion. In this study, all patients having baseline CD4<200/µl were taken TMP/SMX for the PCP prophylaxis, so that the incidence of PCP in patients with CD4<50/µl group was modified by this medication. However, after the re-categorization of MBL expression type in the revised manuscript (deficient/low/intermediate/high), the cut-off level of CD4 counts below or over 50/µl were not a critical factor of PCP. Therefore, we added Fig 1. b (CD4<200) and c (≧200) in revised version to clarify the impact of PCP prophylaxis that they have been taken or not. As a result, we confirmed that deficient MBL expression type was an independent risk factor of PCP incidence whether CD4 counts were below nor over 200/µl through K-M analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard analysis (P10, line 204-210; P11, line 220-226).

“Were other important confounders not accounted for such as susceptibility to other OIs? Another caveat is that presence of coinfections impacting liver function could impact MBL levels and this confounder was not controlled for.”

Thanks for your suggestion. Because the data associated with liver function (i.e. liver transaminase, prothrombin time and choline-esterase activity) and all of plasma samples were not available, we could not conduct the analysis including these confounders. We also agree that MBL synthesis can be affected by many other confounders including liver functions, co-infections such as hepatitis B and C virus and other OIs. In consideration of these concerns, we retried cross-sectional, univariate and multivariate analysis including HBsAg and HCV-Ab as additional confounding variables. As a result, deficient expression type remained as a significant risk factor of PCP histories (P9, line 190-193, Table 2), and its incidence (P11, line 220-226, Table 3). We believe these data show the critical role of MBL expression type at the onset of PCP upon the co-infection of hepatitis B and C virus.

To reviewer #2:

The only suggestion that I might offer involves the distinction between MBL low genotypes and MBL deficiency.

As you mentioned, patients classified “low” in our first manuscript includes complete deficiency to relatively low expression. Therefore, their plasma MBL concentrations distributed between undetectable to relatively low levels (shown in Fig 2). We re-analyzed our data according to your kind advice that we should distinguish the deficiency and low. As a result, we achieved more impressive results. Briefly, we confirmed that MBL deficiency associated with PCP histories (Table 2), cumulative provability (Fig 1) and incidence independently upon sex, age, CD4 and log10VL (Table 3). We appreciate your great advice and believe that our revised data improved to show the association between MBL expression type and PCP onset more clearly through the new manuscript.

Although the authors demonstrate a very strong correlation between genotype and deficiency, their analysis of susceptibility to PCP is with the genotype, not the phenotype. Perhaps they could make this distinction in their concluding remarks.

As you mentioned, we agree the limitation that we could not analyze the MBL phenotype and the PCP onset, because all of plasma samples were not available. Therefore, we added this discussion that further studies are needed to clarify the association of MBL phenotype and PCP onset (P15, line 314-318).

Response to Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

We apologize that first manuscript was not suitable for the PLOS ONE format. We have made the revised manuscript according to the instruction included in the URL you provided, then please confirm it again.

2. Please provide the following details about the stored biological samples used in your study:

(1) source of the samples (2) whether the samples were completely de-identified before researchers accessed the samples. We note that you state that "stored samples derived from the Lampang HIV cohort in “unlinked anonymous” pattern can be used in subsequent analyses without requiring additional ethical approval." Please clarify whether the samples were "unlinked anonymous" before you accessed them. Please add this information to the methods section and your ethics statement in your online submission form.

Thanks for your suggestion. (1) We used the genomic DNA extracted by the standard protocol of phenol-chloroform method from the peripheral blood of registered patients. We clarified this preparation steps in the revised manuscript (P6, line 128-129). (2) This study was performed by the second use of anonymity samples and information provided in Lampang HIV cohort. Before the analysis and manuscript preparation, authors have not been provided any information that can identify the individuals registered in cohort. We added this point in ethical statement (P8, line 177-179), and input in the submission form.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

I (Kunio Yanagisawa) have already applied my information to ORCID form that you indicated.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

We apologize our lack of understanding that the description of "data not shown " is not accepted. We deleted this description, then the data necessary to make discussion was included in supportive information at the end of revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_201030.docx

Decision Letter 1

Aftab A Ansari

3 Nov 2020

Deficiency of Mannose-binding Lectin is a Risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in a Natural History Cohort of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Thailand

PONE-D-20-20525R1

Dear Dr. Yanagisawa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Aftab A. Ansari, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Aftab A Ansari

24 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-20525R1

Deficiency of Mannose-binding Lectin is a Risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in a Natural History Cohort of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Thailand

Dear Dr. Yanagisawa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Aftab A. Ansari

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Cumulative probability curves of PCP during follow-up periods (CD4<50/μl) his Kaplan-Meire curve shows the cumulative provability of PCP, if they are categorized by three MBL expression type (low/intermediate/high) and selected by their CD4 cells <50/μl (n = 171).

    The solid line means “low”, and dashed line means intermediate and high combined. The difference between “low “vs “int + high” were analyzed by log-rank test; however, there were no significance (p = 0.44).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Box plots of plasma MBL concentrations with or without PCP during the follow-up period (n = 231).

    MBL concentrations were plotted in two group of patients if they have a new episode of PCP (n = 19, plasma MBL was 0.0–4683.4/ng/ml, median 2008.9 ng/ml) or not (n = 212, 0.0–14213.3, median 2057.8 ng/ml) during the follow-up period. The median of each two group was tested by Mann-Whilney U test; however, there were no significance (p = 0.679).

    (DOCX)

    S1 Dataset

    (XLS)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOSE ONE Review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_201030.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES