Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0239964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239964

Clinical characteristics of paediatric autoimmune hepatitis at a referral hospital in Sub Saharan Africa

Taiba Jibril Afaa 1,*, Kokou Hefoume Amegan-Aho 2, Matilda Tierenye Dono 3, Eric Odei 4, Yaw Asante Awuku 5
Editor: Nikhil Pai6
PMCID: PMC7757864  PMID: 33362271

Abstract

Background

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive inflammatory liver disease of unknown aetiology. The number of reported AIH cases is increasing in the developed countries but the same cannot be said about sub Saharan Africa (SSA). Paediatric AIH diagnosis is usually missed and patients present with decompensated liver disease. Our study highlights the clinical profile of paediatric AIH cases at a referral hospital in Ghana.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of all cases of children diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis at the gastroenterology clinic in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Data was extracted from the patients’ records from April 2016 to October 2019. These children were diagnosed based on the presence of autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G and histologic presence of interphase hepatitis with the exclusion of hepatitis A, B, C and E depending on their clinical presentation, Wilson’s disease, HIV, Schistosomiasis and sickle cell disease.

Results

Thirteen patients aged between 5 years to 13 years with a mean age of 10 years were diagnosed with AIH. All the patients had type 1 AIH with majority 8 (61.5%) being females. Most of the children presented with advanced liver disease with complications. Three patients had other associated autoimmune diseases. The patients were treated with prednisolone with or without azathioprine depending on the severity of the liver disease.

Conclusion

Majority of paediatric AIH presents with advanced liver disease. There is the need for early detection to change the natural history of AIH in SSA.

Introduction

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was first reported in the 1950s by Jan Waldenstrom in a group of young women with persistent transaminitis [1]. AIH is a progressive inflammatory liver disease of unknown aetiology that is commoner in females [2]. It is characterized biochemically by elevated transaminases and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), serologically by non-organic specific and liver specific autoantibodies and histologically by interface hepatitis [3]. The age of onset ranges from infancy to eighth decade of life. However, it is quite uncommon before the age of 2 years, and the incidence is higher between 10 and 30 years [4]. The diagnosis is made after other known causes of liver disease have been excluded and typically there is response to immune suppression [3]. There is associated 40% of family history and 20% of personal history of other autoimmune diseases like thyroiditis, coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, vitiligo, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and nephrotic syndrome either at presentation or at follow up [5, 6].

There are 2 types of AIH depending on the type of antibodies isolated in serology: antinuclear antibody (ANA) and/or smooth muscle antibody (SMA) in type 1 AIH, and in type 2 there is liver kidney microsomal antibody (anti-LKM) or antibody to liver cytosolic antigen type1 (LC1) [7]. In children, lower autoantibodies levels are considered as positive. For example, ANA and SMA levels of ≥ 1:20 and anti-LKM of ≥ 1:10 are positive whilst higher levels of ≥1: 40 are considered positive in adults [4]. Like other autoimmune diseases, AIH is increasing in prevalence over the years. In the United Kingdom, a 6-fold yearly increase was reported over the period between 1990 to the 2000s [8] whilst in Canada, an incidence rate of 0.23 cases per 100,000 children was noted [9]. Not much is known about AIH in African children. To the best of our knowledge only Egypt has two published data in Africa [10, 11] on paediatric AIH. The first study concerned 30 cases from the year 2000 to 2008 [10] and the second, 25 cases [11] over a 13-year period between 2004 and 2017. Both studies had female predominance with type 1 AIH diagnosed in all cases. All patients in both studies had varying degrees of liver disease. Presentations of AIH in children are similar to that seen in adults. Clinical features of AIH vary and can mimic any form of liver disease from fulminant hepatitis to chronic liver disease with features of cirrhosis and portal hypertension [12]. Treatment is predominantly with prednisolone with or without azathioprine [13]. In paediatric AIH, remission is defined as complete clinical recovery with transaminase levels within the normal range, normalization of IgG levels, negative or very low-titre autoantibodies, and histological resolution of inflammation and this depends on the disease severity at presentation [8]. Our study highlights the clinical profile of paediatric AIH cases at a referral hospital in Ghana.

Materials and methods

Setting and patients

This is a retrospective review of all cases of children diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis from April 2016 to October 2019, at the paediatric gastroenterology clinic in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. The study site is a tertiary hospital that receives referral from all over the country and sometimes from the West African sub region. The diagnosis of AIH was based on: full history and physical examination, liver chemistry test, coagulation studies (INR), autoantibodies (SMA, ANA, Anti-LKM 1), serum immunoglobulin Ig G levels, serum α1 antitrypsin levels, abdominal ultrasound and liver biopsy in patient without coagulopathy. The following tests were done to exclude other causes of liver disease: hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody (if antibody tested positive we further confirmed by HCV- RNA), serum α1 antitrypsin levels, Wilson’s disease (serum ceruloplasmin, 24 hour urine copper and Keyser-Fleischer rings in the eyes). In patients with acute hepatitis or fulminant hepatitis, hepatitis A and E Ig M was done. HIV 1 and 2, sickle cell disease (Haemoglobin electrophoresis) and Schistosoma Ig M (when there is a history of contact with water bodies). The last 3 investigations above are not recommended in international investigations for AIH, but this is done routinely in Ghana because of the high frequency of these diseases in the population and their possible confounding effect in the diagnosis of AIH. There was no history of intake of any mediation either herbal or orthodox prior to presentation and no family history of autoimmune diseases.

Data collection

Demographic data, clinical features, biochemical findings, diagnostic imaging, and liver biopsy reports were obtained from the patients’ record. Portal hypertension was diagnosed clinically with splenomegaly, ascites and presence of oesophageal varices at endoscopy.

Statistical analysis

Data collected was entered into excel sheet. These were summarized in terms of frequency and percentage for quantitative data. The median and age range were estimated for the participants in the study.

Ethical issues

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. A waiver was obtained from the IRB, as it was difficult to obtain informed consent from the parents or guardians. A 3- letter code was assigned to each patient to ensure anonymity.

Results

Demography and clinical features

Thirteen patients with a median age of 10 years (range, 5 to 13 years) and majority females 8(61.5%) were diagnosed with autoimmune liver disease most of whom were autoimmune hepatitis (Table 1). These patients were being followed up for four and half years to eleven months with a median of two years five months.

Table 1. Clinical features and types of autoimmune diseases.

Characteristics (n = 13 patients) Frequencies
Age at presentation in years (median [range]) 10 (5–13)
Duration of symptoms (median in months) 5
Gender, n (%)
    Male 5 (38.5)
    Female 8 (61.5)
Clinical presentation, n (%)
    Fulminant 1 (7.7)
    Acute 2 (15.7)
    Insidious 10 (76.6)
    Complications of chronic liver disease 8 (61.5)
Detailed clinical findings, n (%)
    Jaundice 13 (100)
    Weight loss 6 (46.2)
    Bleeding 3 (23.1)
    Anasarca 4 (30.8)
    Hepatomegaly 8 (61.5)
    Splenomegaly 6 (46.2)
    Ascites 5 (38.5)
    Encephalopathy 2 (15.4)
Auto-immune disorders, n (%)
    Auto-immune hepatitis (all Type 1) 11 (84.6)
    Autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis 2 (15.4)
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 1 (7.7)
    Ulcerative colitis 1 (7.7)

Clinical and laboratory features

Tables 13 below show the clinical features, disease outcome and the laboratory investigations done respectively. The duration of symptoms in most but one patient with fulminant hepatitis was between 5 to 24 months with an average of 10 months. The patient with fulminant hepatitis had a duration of symptoms of 1 week and he tested negative for both hepatitis A and E infections. Most patients had chronic liver disease and portal hypertension, with eight patients presenting with hypoalbuminaemia, four with thrombocytopaenia, 8 with anaemia, two with anasarca and three with oesophageal varices, symptomatic with bleeding episodes. The varices were treated with endoscopic variceal band ligation. Histology was done in 9 (69.2%) patients whilst the rest had to start treatment without histology due to severe coagulopathy or advanced liver disease (Fig 1).

Table 3. Serology and haemoglobin electrophoresis results at presentation.

Patients ANA SMA Anti LKM-1 IgG(6.5–16.0g/L) HBsAg Anti-HCV HCV PCR Schistosoma IgM HIV ½ Hb electrophoresis
1 Neg 1:80 Neg 26.40 Neg Neg   Pos Neg AS
2 1:80 1:40 Neg 22.62 Neg Pos Neg Neg SS
3 Neg 1:40 Neg 18.64 Neg Neg Neg AA
4 1:20 1:20 Neg 20.60 Neg Neg   Pos Neg AA
5 Neg 1:20 Neg 18.20 Neg Neg   Neg AS
6 Neg 1:20 Neg 20.42 Neg Neg Pos Neg AA
7 1:20 1:40 Neg 17.80 Neg Neg Neg AA
8 Neg Neg Neg 18. 94 Neg Neg Neg AA
9 Neg 1:80 Neg 21.10 Neg Neg   Neg AS
10 Neg 1:80 Neg 12.22 Neg Neg   Neg AA
11 Neg Neg Neg 18.80 Neg Neg Neg AA
12 1:80 Neg Neg 21.50 Neg Neg Neg AA
13 Neg 1:20 Neg 12.53 Neg Neg Neg AA

ANA: antinuclear antibodies; AntiLKM-1: anti liver kidney microsomal type 1; Anti-HCV: hepatitis C antibodies; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; Hb: haemoglobin; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; IgG: immunoglobulin G; IgM: immunoglobulin M; Neg: negative; Pos: positive

Fig 1. Histology of autoimmune hepatitis showing interphase hepatitis with periportal inflammation dominated by lymphocytes.

Fig 1

Table 2. Baseline full blood count, liver function test and INR results at presentation.

Patients Hb (g/dL) Platelets (x106/L) WBC (x106/L) INR Albumin (g/L) Total Protein (g/L) ALP (U/L) ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) GGT (IU/L) Total bilirubin (μmol/L) Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)
1 10.7 151 2.9 5.1 28 100 577 249 449 118 234 209
2 9.4   228 7.2  1.7 41 92 639 1526 1819 116 315 253
3  7.4 113 3.8 8.2 33 67 452 279 345 58 284 242
4  9.1 73 4.6 5.1 19 58 396 155 179 55 251 179
5  11.7  360 7.3  1.4 41 81 434 1175 1090 128 277 138
6  11.6  428 6.5 5.9 31 55 241 722 1567 40 551 246
7  8.3  650 4.8  4.8 21 76 932 473 356 116 376 247
8  9.8  112 3.6 3.7 28 78 442 531 556 116 219 186
9  12.6  453 5.8  1.1 43 88 455 864 543 89 244 202
10  13.1  306 5.3  4.8 34 75 794 3175 2025 77 285.2 132
11 9.9 180 11.4 1.4 35 84 381 270.9 246.9 265 186.7 113
12 9.0 342 7.1 0.9 41 91 873 326 234 96 115 103
13 9.4 137 4.2 3.9 27 65 227 26 69 75 550 408

ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyl transferase; Hb: haemoglobin; INR: international normalised ratio; WBC: white blood cells

Four patients had other types of autoimmune disorders. Two patients had autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis or overlap syndrome, after an initial diagnosis of AIH. These patients developed cholestasis during treatment for which Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and liver biopsy were done to confirm the diagnosis. One patient had ulcerative colitis, and another had systemic lupus erythematosus making the total of 2 patients with other personal history of non-hepatic autoimmune disorders. There was no family history of autoimmune diseases in these patients. All patients tested negative for Wilson’s disease, hepatitis B and HIV. Three patients had specific IgM for Schistosoma mansoni and were treated with two courses of praziquantel prior to the diagnosis of AIH. Schistosoma specific Ig M were lost during AIH-specific treatment, as autoantibody levels have normalized.

Treatment

Prednisolone alone was started in nine patients with severe liver disease or those with portal hypertension at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day (maximum 60 mg/day). This was gradually decreased over a period of three months to a dose of 2.5 mg/day. The liver enzymes together with the INR levels were monitored weekly for two weeks, two weekly for one month, monthly for three months and then three monthly. Azathioprine was added at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, once the liver enzymes had significantly improved. Azathioprine then becomes the maintenance therapy. For patients without severe disease, prednisolone and azathioprine are started at the same time with similar monitoring as in severe cases. None of the patients had stopped treatment at the time of this write up. Ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 5mg/kg 3 times daily was added to the treatment for the two patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Outcome

All children responded well to initial treatment for AIH. Two patients died during treatment from unrelated causes. The first patient died of acute gastroenteritis four months into treatment after hospital discharge. No oral rehydration therapy was given and this child died on the way to hospital on the third day of the illness. The second patient who died, defaulted hospital follow up for three months, after initial response to prednisolone and he was brought dead to the hospital.

Discussion

This is the first report on paediatric AIH from Ghana and possibly from sub Saharan Africa This study, similarly to those from Egypt, did not find any asymptomatic patient as it is usually seen in developed countries [4]. Many odds are against these cohorts with AIH. These are that, autoimmune liver disease in children is inherently aggressive and progresses rapidly with complications [14]. In African Americans, who share a common ancestry with these cohorts, AIH is usually diagnosed at advanced stage with cirrhosis but with good response to therapy [15]. Females predominance of eight (61.5%) patients in this study is similar to that reported in the two Egyptian studies, with 60% [11] and 70.5% [10] respectively and one Canadian study with 60.3% [9]. None of the patients in this study had Type 2 AIH. Type 2 AIH is less common (10%) in paediatric AIH [16] and is usually seen in a small population of younger children [3]. Most of the patients 10 (76.6%) presented insidiously as they had been seen at peripheral health facilities for months without a diagnosis.

We excluded Retroviral infection (HIV) [17], sickle cell disease [18], Schistosomiasis [19] as possible causes of liver disease in our patients because of high prevalence of these conditions in African countries. False positive viral antibodies had been reported in up to 11% of patients with AIH [20]. The positive report of both the hepatitis C virus and Schistosomiasis antibodies in this study may be due to molecular mimicry confounded my hypergammaglobulinaemia in AIH [21]. The finding of two (15.4%) of these cohorts with normal Ig G level is similar to that reported in international literature where 15% of patients with type 1 AIH had normal Ig G level and are usually with acute presentation [22]. The frequency of other concurrent autoimmune diseases such as ulcerative colitis and systemic lupus erythematosus in this study is similar to the prevalence reported in other studies [23]. The commonest reported extra hepatic autoimmune diseases include, thyroid disease, autoimmune skin diseases, coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease [23]. This indicate that all children with autoimmune liver disease should be screened for other autoimmune diseases annually [23].

Liver biopsy and histology required for confirmation and staging of the disease, was done in only nine (69.2%) because of advance liver disease at presentation complicated with coagulopathy, bleeding and ascites, which are contraindications for liver biopsy. In our facility where transjugular liver biopsy is not available, these patients with other laboratory features of AIH were treated with good response similar to what was done in adult studies [24]. All the patients had good response to the standard treatment with prednisolone with or without azathioprine, regardless of the severity of the liver disease [4]. Except for the 2 patients who died, all the remaining patients are still on treatment and are doing well. The circumstances of the mortalities recorded highlight the difficulties in managing patients in developing countries. There is thus, the need for public awareness creation about liver diseases, the importance of seeking healthcare early and remain in care throughout the duration of treatment.

Limitations of the study

There is small number of patients with short follow up period in this study, as this is not a true reflection of disease prevalence in the country.

Conclusion

Autoimmune liver disease is also presented in indigenous African children. It should be investigated for in all children with liver disease of any severity, as it is a very treatable condition. Diseases like sickle cell disease and HIV should always be excluded in populations with high prevalence of these diseases. Furthermore, early diagnosis and therapy would reduce liver-related complications.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Lawrence Edusei of the Department of Pathology of Korle Bu Teaching Hospital for assistance with the histologic reviews and the pictures.

Data Availability

All information required are included in the paper.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Liberal R, Grant CR, Mieli-Vergani G, Diego Vergani D. Autoimmune hepatitis: a comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 2013; 126–139. 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pathak S, Kamat D. Autoimmune Hepatitis in Children. Pediatr Ann. 2018; 47(2):e81–e86. 10.3928/19382359-20180126-01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kerkar N, Naon H. Autoimmune Liver Disease in Children. Ann Pediatr Child Health 2015; 3(2): 1045. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D, Baumann U, Czubkowski P, Debray D, Dezsofi A, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Autoimmune Liver Disease: ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee Position Statement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018; 66(2):345–360. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guo L, Zhou L, Zhang N, Deng B, Wang B. Extrahepatic Autoimmune Diseases in Patients with Autoimmune Liver Diseases: A Phenomenon Neglected by Gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;22376231 10.1155/2017/2376231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wong GW, Heneghan MA. Association of extrahepatic manifestations with autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis 2015; 33(suppl 2): 25–35. 10.1159/000440707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sebode M, Weiler-Normann C, Liwinski T, Schramm C. Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Liver Disease-Clinical and Diagnostic Relevance. Front Immunol. 2018;9:609 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Reid F, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis in childhood: a 20-year experience. Hepatology 1997;25:541–7. 10.1002/hep.510250308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiménez-Rivera C, Ling SC, Ahmed N, Yap J, Aglipay M, Critch J, et al. Incidence and Characteristics of Autoimmune Hepatitis. Pediatrics 2015; 136(5):e1237–48. 10.1542/peds.2015-0578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El-Koofy N, Fahmy M, Aziz M, El-Hennawy A, El-Karaksy H. Features of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Egyptian Children. Med. J. Cairo Univ 2010;78 (1):107–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bahairy OGA. Characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis in a sample of Egyptian children. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette 2017;65(4): 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maggiore G, Nastasio S, Sciveres M. Juvenile autoimmune hepatitis: Spectrum of the disease. World J Hepatol. 2014;6(7):464–476. 10.4254/wjh.v6.i7.464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Czaja AJ. Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2016;10(2):177–203. 10.5009/gnl15352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferri PM, Ferreira AR, Miranda DM, Simões E, Silva AC. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis in children: A challenge for pediatric hepatologists. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(33): 4470–4473. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lim KN1, Casanova RL, Boyer TD, Bruno CJ. Autoimmune hepatitis in African Americans: presenting features and response to therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96(12):3390–4. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05272.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Paediatric autoimmune liver disease. Arch Dis Child 2013;98:1012–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Price JC, Thio CL. Liver disease in the HIV-infected individual. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8(12): 1002–1012. 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.08.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shah R, Taborda C, Chawla S. Acute and chronic hepatobiliary manifestations of sickle cell disease: A review. World J Gastrointest pathophysiol 2017; 8(3): 108–116. 10.4291/wjgp.v8.i3.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shaker Y, Samy N, Ashour E. Hepatobiliary Schistosomiasis. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2014; 2: 212–216. 10.14218/JCTH.2014.00018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McFarlane IG, Smith HM, Johnson PJ, Bray GP, vergani D, Williams R. Hepatitis C antibodies in chronic active hepatitis: pathogenetic factoror false-positive result? Lancet 1990; 335:754–757. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90870-b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Czaja AJ. Examining pathogenic concepts of autoimmune hepatitis cues to future investigations and interventions. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(45): 6579–6609. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i45.6579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune hepatitis. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 2015; 63(4):971–1004. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Muratori P, Fabbri A, Lalanne C, Lenzi M, Muratori L. Autoimmune liver disease and concomitant extrahepatic autoimmune disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;27:1175–9. 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Björnsson E, Talwalkar J, Treeprasertsuk S, Neuhauser M, Lindor K. Patients with typical laboratory features of autoimmune hepatitis rarely need a liver biopsy for diagnosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9(1):57–63. 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nikhil Pai

3 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-09611

Clinical characteristics of paediatric autoimmune hepatitis at a referral hospital in Sub Saharan Africa

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Afaa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 16 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nikhil Pai, BSc, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study.

Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent.

If patients' guardians provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.  Please also include a caption for figure 1.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript Table 2 is cited but not included. 

5. Table 3 is included but not cited. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for your submission and your patience with this decision. I would look forward to seeing the comments from the authors thoughtfully addressed and resubmitted. In recognition of the paucity of data from Sub Saharan Africa on this topic, I would encourage the authors to please refine this manuscript further for re-review. Once sent back, we will consider the submission further in light of the requisite edits and issue a further decision.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for writing up your experience with paediatric AIH. There is not much data from Africa and your efforts are applauded. Nonetheless there are some comments that need to be addressed.

Major comments:

- There were a few patients who were ANA negative and ASMA negative with high IgG levels. Indeed IgG levels become elevated in cirrhosis (of any cause). How did the authors confirm a diagnosis of AIH in these children?

- A frequent differential diagnosis for AIH is drug induced liver injury - The authors need to make a comment of whether these patients were taking any medications including herbs/over the counter meds which may have caused DILI

- Could the authors do a Simplified AIH score for their patients? (Hennes et al. Hepatology 2008 Jul;48(1):169-76. doi: 10.1002/hep.22322.).

Can be done at: https://www.mdcalc.com/simplified-autoimmune-hepatitis-aih-score

- The authors mentioned that AIH patients typically present with elevated transaminases. Yet the ALT and AST levels are not presented as well as the other liver function tests (bilirubin, ALP, GGT, albumin) are not presented in the results. Do the authors have this information?

- It is difficult to determine from the results what proportion of patients had a response. This is touched upon in the discussion but really belongs in the results.Typically in Type 1 AIH, 75% of patients are steroid responsive. Also how was the prednisolone weaned over time? What was the maintenance therapy? did patients stay on AZA alone and were weaned off pred? or did they stay on low dose pred? A little more details is needed here

- How long was the median follow-up period for these patients?

- It would be interesting to know if these patients had previously engaged in the hospital (for other reasons) and AIH could have been screened for earlier?

- Did the authors have any information on family history?

- I suggest the authors have subheadings to present the results section rather than 1 whole paragraph.

I.e. Demographics, Clinical and laboratory features, treatment, Outcome

- the section about cause of the 2 deaths belongs in the results section, not the discussion

- The authors should mention briefly about the limitations of the study - e.g. small patient numbers, lack of long follow-up, etc.

Minor comments:

- the acronym SSA for sub Saharan Africa is used without being previously defined in the abstract

- please be consistent with British vs. American spelling. The authors use words like “aetiology” and “paediatric” which is British spelling and then “Normalization” and “titer” which is American spelling.

- the sentence “thirteen patients aged between 5 years to 13 years…” in the Methods should be removed as it belongs in the Results section.

- similarly “Treatment was with steroid with or without azathioprine…” should be removed from the Data collection section”.

- I would change the terms “autoimmune sclerosis cholangitis” and “sclerosing cholangitis” to “primary sclerosing cholangitis”

Reviewer #2: In their retrospective case series “Clinical characteristics of paediatric autoimmune hepatitis at a referral hospital in Sub Saharan Africa» Afaa et al. describe the clinical characteristics of 13 patients.

The introduction

is a general review of AIH, which should be shortened. Instead, I would suggest expanding on clinical features in pediatric AIH described in developed and developing countries (Africa and other parts of the world) in order to lead to a reason why their experience with AIH should be added to the literature.

Results

Did the patient had already cirrhosis? Which stage?

How long was the follow-up time?

Two patient died, please expand on their disease course in the result section. Why did the die?

In table 1

It is stated that 11 patients had AIH and 2 sclerosing cholangitis. Did the later 2 had overlap disease? In the text it is stated that all patients had AIH – please specifiy.

For the expression “hepatic failure” I would suggest using the King’s College criteria for definition of Acute Liver Failure and additionally report the INR value at presentation for all patients.

It would be interesting to document the lab values at presentation. Could the authors provide numbers for liver enzymes (ASAT, ALAT), gGT, albumin, thrombocytes, bilirubin.

For table 2

could the authors state, whether the measured antibodies were negative or not available/ not performed and provide numbers for IgG or at least the multiple of the upper limit of normal.

Please add a legend to the table with the full names of the antibodies, etc.

Discussion

“The positive report of both the hepatitis C virus and Schistosomiasis antibodies are due to the general over production of immunoglobulins in patients with AIH”. – please add a reference for this statement.

In table 2 there are 3 patients with schistosomiasis IgM, in the discussion are only two mentioned, please correct/specify. Why were the patients “treated with 2 courses of praziquantel” when the authors assume that the overproduction of immunoglobulins are responsible for the IgM? – please discuss.

“The finding of 15.4% of these cohorts with normal Ig G level” – as the patients number is low, I would suggest to also state numbers e.g. “Two (15%) patients had normal IgG levels”

Interestingly there are ¾ of patients with insidious onset. In general it is documented to be less than 40% – please discuss.

What is the message of the findings from these 13 patients? The conclusion the authors give is common knowledge.

Some English editing needed.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0239964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239964.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Sep 2020

Dear Sir,

RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS COMMENTS

Thank you for reviewing my manuscript for possible publication in your journal. Below are the responses to the comments.

Response to the Editor’s Comments

1. Comment: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Answer: The manuscript naming and style has been changed to PLOS ONE’s style.

2. Comment: In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study. Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients' guardians provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

Answer: The required information had been added to the manuscript under the section of “ethical Issues”.

3. Comment: Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure. Please also include a caption for figure 1.

Answer: Figure 1 had been referred to appropriately in the text and a caption had been added to it.

4. Comment: We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript Table 2 is cited but not included.

Answer: This mistake had been corrected.

5. Comment: Table 3 is included but not cited. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Answer: Table 3 has been included and captioned appropriately.

Response to Reviewer 1’s Major Comments

1. Comment: Some patients who were ANA negative and ASMA negative with high IgG levels. IgG levels become elevated in cirrhosis (of any cause). How did the authors confirm a diagnosis of AIH in these children?

Answer: A combination of laboratory investigations, histology and response to therapy as defined by guidelines were used to diagnose these patients. Several studies have been done in children and adults on sero negative AIH. (Maggiore G, Roux K, Johanet C, Fabre M, Sciveres M, Riva S. Seronegative autoimmune hepatitis in childhood. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 ;42(5):E5-E6).

2. Comment: The authors need to make a comment of whether these patients were taking any medications including herbs/over the counter meds which may have caused DILI. These patients were not on any mediation and this comment has been documented in the manuscript. Could the authors do a Simplified AIH score for their patients? (Hennes et al. Hepatology 2008 Jul;48(1):169-76. doi: 10.1002/hep.22322.). Can be done at: https://www.mdcalc.com/simplified-autoimmune-hepatitis-aih-score. Answer: The simplified AIH score was developed for adults. It may not work well for children as very low autoantibody titres (positivity at a dilution ≥ 1:20 for ANA and SMA, ≥ 1:10 for anti-LKM1compared to a dilution ≥ 1:40 in adults) are used for the diagnosis of AIH in children. Moreover, there is no distinction between aih and antoimmune sclerosing cholangitis which can only be differentiated if a cholangiogram is performed. Hence the score will be much lower in these patients. (Ferri PM, Ferreira AR, Miranda DM, Simões E Silva AC.Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis in children: A challenge for pediatric hepatologists. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(33): 4470-4473).

3. Comment: The authors mentioned that AIH patients typically present with elevated transaminases. Yet the ALT and AST levels are not presented as well as the other liver function tests (bilirubin, ALP, GGT, albumin) are not presented in the results. Do the authors have this information?

Answer: Yes the information is available and this has been captured in table 2.

4. Comment: It is difficult to determine from the results what proportion of patients had a response. This is touched upon in the discussion but really belongs in the results. Typically in Type 1 AIH, 75% of patients are steroid responsive. Also how was the prednisolone weaned over time? What was the maintenance therapy? did patients stay on AZA alone and were weaned off pred? or did they stay on low dose pred? A little more details is needed here.

Answer: A detail of the treatment has be documented in the results under treatment and outcome section.

5. Comment: How long was the median follow-up period for these patients?

Answer: The follow up is from 4 years to 11 months with a median of 2 yrs 5 months.

6. Comment: It would be interesting to know if these patients had previously engaged in the hospital (for other reasons) and AIH could have been screened for earlier?

Answer: These patients were not previously screened for AIH due to lack of expertise. This is one of the reasons for this publication as data from this part of the world is scanty.

7. Comment: Did the authors have any information on family history?

Answer: Yes, there was no family history of autoimmune disease in any of the patients.

8. Comment: I suggest the authors have subheadings to present the results section rather than 1 whole paragraph. I.e.Demographics, Clinical and laboratory features, treatment, Outcome.

Answer: Subheadings have been applied to the results section.

9. Comment: The section about cause of the 2 deaths belongs in the results section, not the discussion.

Answer: Causes of death had been moved to results section under outcomes.

10. Comment: The authors should mention briefly about the limitations of the study - e.g. small patient numbers, lack of long follow-up, etc.

Answer: The limitations of the study has been included.

Response to the Reviewer 1’s Minor comments

Comment: The acronym SSA for sub Saharan Africa is used without being previously defined in the abstract.

Answer: The acronym has been applied.

Comment: Please be consistent with British vs. American spelling. The authors use words like “aetiology” and “paediatric” which is British spelling and then “Normalization” and “titer” which is American spelling.

Answer: Language change has been changed to British spelling.

Comment: The sentence “thirteen patients aged between 5 years to 13 years…” in the Methods should be removed as it belongs in the Results section.

Answer: The sentence was removed from the method section.

Comment: Similarly “Treatment was with steroid with or without azathioprine…” should be removed from the Data collection section”.

Answer: The sentence was removed from the method section.

Comment: I would change the terms “autoimmune sclerosis cholangitis” and “sclerosing cholangitis” to “primary sclerosing cholangitis”

Answer: An overlap syndrome between AIH and sclerosing cholangitis (ASC) is more common in children than in adults. In paediatric literature ASC or overlap syndrome is the preferred terminology. (Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Karani J, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis/ sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome in childhood: a 16-year prospective study. Hepatology 2001;33:544–53).

Response to the Reviewer 2’s Comments

Comment: The introduction is a general review of AIH, which should be shortened. Instead, I would suggest expanding on clinical features in pediatric AIH described in developed and developing countries (Africa and other parts of the world) in order to lead to a reason why their experience with AIH should be added to the literature.

Answer: Only two studies had been published from Africa and both are from Egypt. Details of these African studies together with other relevant information in paediatrics have been added to the introduction.

RESULTS

1. Comment: Did the patient had already cirrhosis? Which stage?

Answer: Four patients had cirrhosis stage 2.

2. Comment: How long was the follow-up time?

Answer: The follow up is from 4 years to 11 months with a median of 2 yrs 5 months.

3. Comment: Two patient died, please expand on their disease course in the result section. Why did the die?

Answer: The cause of death and the disease course had been expanded in the result section.

4. Comment: In table 1 It is stated that 11 patients had AIH and 2 sclerosing cholangitis. Did the later 2 had overlap disease? In the text it is stated that all patients had AIH – please specify.

Answer: Yes the 2 patients had overlap syndrome. All 13 patients were initially diagnosed with AIH 1, until later when the two developed cholestasis, which was confirmed as ASC.

5. Comment: For the expression “hepatic failure” I would suggest using the King’s College criteria for definition of Acute Liver Failure and additionally report the INR value at presentation for all patients.

Answer: The King’s College criteria for definition of Acute Liver Failure was used and all the inr levels has been included in table 2.

6. Comment: It would be interesting to document the lab values at presentation. Could the authors provide numbers for liver enzymes (ASAT, ALAT), gGT, albumin, thrombocytes, bilirubin.

Answer: The lab values at presentation have been documented in table.

7. Comment: For table 2 could the authors state, whether the measured antibodies were negative or not available/ not performed and provide numbers for IgG or at least the multiple of the upper limit of normal.

Answer: The actual measurements for IgG and autoantibodies levels had been added to table 3.

8. Comment: Please add a legend to the table with the full names of the antibodies, etc. Answer: Legends have been added to the tables

DISCUSSION

1. Comment: The positive report of both the hepatitis C virus and Schistosomiasis antibodies are due to the general over production of immunoglobulins in patients with AIH”. – please add a reference for this statement.

Answer: The statement has been rephrased and referenced.

2. Comment: In table 2 there are 3 patients with Schistosomiasis IgM, in the discussion are only two mentioned, please correct/specify.

Answer: Three patients tested positive for Schistosomiasis as stated in the result, and this has been corrected in the discussion.

3.Comment: Why were the patients “treated with 2 courses of praziquantel” when the authors assume that the overproduction of immunoglobulins are responsible for the IgM? – please discuss.

Answer: The patients were treated with two courses of praziquantel prior to the involvement of the author in the management of the patients. The issue of overproduction of immunoglobulins as been discussed.

4. Comment: “The finding of 15.4% of these cohorts with normal Ig G level” – as the patients number is low, I would suggest to also state numbers e.g. “Two (15%) patients had normal IgG levels”

Answer: This has been corrected.

5. Comment: Interestingly there are ¾ of patients with insidious onset. In general it is documented to be less than 40% – please discuss.

Answer: This has been discussed.

6. Comment: What is the message of the findings from these 13 patients? The conclusion the authors give is common knowledge.

Answer: The conclusion has been reviewed.

7. Comment: Some English editing needed.

Answer: The language has been edited.

Thank you

Taiba Jibril Afaa.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Nikhil Pai

17 Sep 2020

Clinical characteristics of paediatric autoimmune hepatitis at a referral hospital in Sub Saharan Africa

PONE-D-20-09611R1

Dear Dr. Afaa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nikhil Pai, BSc, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for your responses to our reviewers.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Nikhil Pai

22 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-09611R1

Clinical characteristics of paediatric autoimmune hepatitis at a referral hospital in Sub Saharan Africa

Dear Dr. Afaa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nikhil Pai

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All information required are included in the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES