Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2020 Dec 22;48(12):0300060520980201. doi: 10.1177/0300060520980201

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome induced by food poisoning in a pediatric patient: a case report

Xue-mei Wu 1, Guang-liang Wang 2, Chang-gui Kou 3, Jiang-tao Wang 1, Jian-min Liang 1,#, Ya-qin Yu 3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC7758666  PMID: 33349079

Abstract

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can develop in patients following exposure to multiple triggers, including blood pressure fluctuations, kidney diseases, immunosuppressive agents, chemotherapy, or autoimmune disorders. However, to the best of our knowledge, the development of PRES secondary to food poisoning has not been previously reported, especially in a pediatric patient. Here, we report a 13-year-old boy who presented with PRES following the consumption of palmatum (a chicken feet dish). The patient presented with headache, vomiting, and altered consciousness. Neuroimaging findings revealed white matter hyperintensities in a bilateral, symmetrical, and parieto-occipital pattern. The patient was diagnosed with PRES and was managed with fluid expansion and a short-term mannitol regimen (1 g/kg every 12 hours for 3 days). Neuroimaging findings returned to normal at 8 days after admission. Food poisoning may therefore be a new possible trigger for PRES. A timely PRES diagnosis is recommended to prevent possible central nervous system complications.

Keywords: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, food poisoning, pediatric, white matter hyperintensities, headache, vomiting, altered consciousness

Introduction

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinicoradiological syndrome that was first described in 1996 by Hinchey et al.1 PRES is a reversible, subcortical, vascular brain edema disease, and is accompanied by a variety of acute nervous system symptoms. The clinical presentation of PRES often encompasses multiple symptoms, including headache, altered consciousness, seizures, and varying degrees of visual impairment.2 The typical imaging features include subcortical white matter edema. The bilateral parietal and occipital lobes are most frequently involved. Other affected regions include the frontal lobe, temporal lobe, cerebellum, basal ganglia, brainstem, and thalamus. Most lesions are symmetrical, with mild space-occupying effects.3 To date, a number of triggers, including blood pressure fluctuations, eclampsia, renal diseases, and cytotoxic drugs, have been associated with the development of PRES.47 This study presents a case of PRES in a 13-year-old boy with a history of food poisoning caused by the consumption of palmatum (chicken feet braised with soy sauce). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of PRES in a patient with food poisoning.

Case report

A 13-year-old boy was admitted to the First Hospital of Jilin University for evaluation following headache, blurred vision, and trembling for 1 day. The patient ate palmatum 1 day before symptom onset. In addition, the patient’s pets (a cat and a dog) died 1 day after ingesting the palmatum. The patient had an otherwise unremarkable history. His blood pressure was 130/90 mmHg, and other physical examinations were normal. No abnormalities were detected in laboratory tests, a poison screening, ultrasound examination of the heart, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electroencephalogram, or chest radiography. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed high signal intensities in the corpus callosum and posterior areas of the brain (Figure 1). The patient was treated with fluid expansion and a short-term mannitol regimen (1 g/kg every 12 hours for 3 days). After 8 days, the brain MRI abnormalities were mostly resolved. These observations are indicative of PRES. After 1 week, the patient’s clinical symptoms (headache, blurred vision, and trembling) had also disappeared, and the patient was discharged from the hospital with an overall positive prognosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Neuroradiological findings from a 13-year-old boy who presented with headache, blurred vision, and trembling. a: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) showing white matter hyperintensities in the callosum and posterior areas of the brain, correlating with the vasogenic edemas, upon admission. b: DWI demonstrating the disappearance of white matter hyperintensities at 8 days after admission.

Discussion

The patient presented with headache, blurred vision, and trembling, which can be caused by elevated blood pressure. The patient’s symptoms resembled the most common clinical features of PRES, as have been previously reported.1,2 Symptoms with acute or subacute onset usually resolve within hours or days, while other symptoms, such as encephalopathy (50%–80%), epilepsy (60%–75%), headache (50%), visual impairment (33%), focal neurological deficit (10%–15%), and status epilepticus (5%–15%), can last for several weeks.8,9 Some studies have suggested that an overreaction of cerebrovascular self-regulation mechanisms results in temporary vasospasm and reversible cerebral ischemia.8,9

Reported cases of PRES have mostly been associated with certain conditions, including hypertension (53%), kidney diseases (45%), malignancy (32%), dialysis dependency (21%), and organ transplantation (24%).8,9 In addition to the “vasogenic” theory (described in the following paragraph), the pathogenesis of PRES can be closely associated with pathological activation of the immune system, suggesting that a rapid onset of hypertension leads to blood–brain barrier damage, causing vasogenic edema.2,10 Although PRES triggers have been identified, an increasing number of atypical PRES cases indicate the possible presence of novel, as-yet-unknown triggers.1113 In the current report, the patient presented with clinicoradiological findings of PRES following the accidental ingestion of contaminated palmatum. This finding may indicate a novel foodborne trigger for PRES.

The failure of cerebral autoregulation following brain edema is a key factor in PRES pathophysiology. Four theories have been postulated to explain the cerebral dysregulation that occurs in PRES.14 The “vasogenic” theory indicates that an increase in blood pressure might lead to hyperperfusion and vasogenic edema, which in turn can lead to reversible cerebral edema. The “cytotoxic” theory suggests that toxins or chemokines in the blood lead to endothelial dysfunction, which can cause cerebral edema. In the “immunogenic” theory, T-cell activation and cytokines may increase endothelial permeability and vasogenic edema, thus causing cerebral edema. Finally, the “neuropeptide” theory suggests that the release of potent vasoconstrictors might lead to vasospasm and ischemia, and subsequent cerebral edema. In the present report, the pathophysiology of PRES was likely associated with the “cytotoxic” theory because the patient’s pets died after eating the palmatum, which might indicate the presence of certain toxins in the dish.

PRES is characterized by headache, disorders of consciousness, visual disturbances, epileptic seizures, and various focal neurological symptoms, all of which resolve within a few hours or days—usually within 3 to 8 days. Distinctive radiological findings of PRES include bilateral subcortical vasogenic edemas, which are reversible in days or weeks, and are located in the occipital and parietal lobes.15 In the present report, the headache, blurred vision, and trembling symptoms may have been associated with vasogenic edemas; these symptoms had diminished by 3 days after admission. In addition, the patient’s MRI findings were resolved by 8 days following admission. Clinical findings of PRES can vary among patients, and a radiographic examination is therefore essential to confirm the diagnosis.

In conclusion, this case report highlights that foodborne factors can possibly trigger PRES. A timely PRES diagnosis, along with prompt and proper treatment, can often lead to a favorable prognosis.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Li-bin Yang.

Footnotes

Data availability: The datasets generated and analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of conflicting interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics statement: This study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University (approval no. 2020-587). All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801284).

References

  • 1.Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 494–500. DOI: 10.1056/nejm199602223340803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hinduja A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical features and outcome. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 71. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bansal S, Bansal R, Goyal MK, et al. Clinical, etiological and imaging profile of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a prospective and follow-up study. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020; 23: 182–188. DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_379_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabinstein AA, Mandrekar J, Merrell R, et al. Blood pressure fluctuations in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 21: 254–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garg RK, Kumar N, Malhotra HS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in eclampsia. Neurol India 2018; 66: 1316–1323. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.241364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deguchi S, Mitsuya K, Nakasu Y, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) induced by pazopanib, a multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a patient with soft-tissue sarcoma: case report and review of the literature. Invest New Drugs 2018; 36: 346–349. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0521-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chowdhary M, Kabbani AA, Tobey D, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a woman with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2015; 11: 1111–1114. DOI: 10.2147/ndt.S84010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology, and outstanding questions. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 914–925. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee VH, Wijdicks EF, Manno EM, et al. Clinical spectrum of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 205–210. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fischer M, Schmutzhard E. [Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2016; 111: 417–424. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-016-0175-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu WL, Leung T, Soo Y, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with concomitant small- and large-vessel thrombosis, atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and cerebral microbleeds. Oxf Med Case Reports 2015; 2015: 179–182. DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omv001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Camlidag I, Cho YJ, Park M, et al. Atypical unilateral posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome mimicking a middle cerebral artery infarction. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16: 1104–1108. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dersch R, Stich O, Goller K, et al. Atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated with chemotherapy with bevacizumab, gemcitabine and cisplatin. J Neurol 2013; 260: 1406–1407. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-013-6866-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feske SK. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a review. Semin Neurol 2011; 31: 202–215. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Paolini S, Jadhav AP. Teaching NeuroImages: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome resulting in hydrocephalus. Neurology 2016; 86: e242–e243. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES