Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Dec 24;19(7):1511. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.027

Reply

M Ines Pinto-Sanchez 1, Elena F Verdu 1
PMCID: PMC7759344  PMID: 33359729

We read the study by Lionetti et al1 regarding the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Italian children with celiac disease with great interest. The prevalence and clinical features of COVID-19 were investigated through a telephone-based survey that involved 387 pediatric patients with a diagnosis of celiac disease based on ESPGHAN criteria. The results were compared with data from the Italian National Institute of Health and the Marche regional government. The survey did not report any positive case of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with celiac disease.

The results are in agreement with our previously published multinational study2 involving 18,000 participants with and without celiac disease from more than 10 different countries. This large study included more than 10,000 patients with celiac disease, and evaluated the risk of contracting COVID-19, mainly in adult patients.2 We are pleased that the study of Lionetti et al,1 which specifically investigated infection prevalence in Italian children, strengthens our conclusions. Taken together the results strongly support the notion that, in both pediatric and adult populations, there is no increased risk of contracting COVID-19 in patients that have been diagnosed with celiac disease. The combined findings are reassuring, particularly because a study recently reported elderly and female patients feeling more vulnerable because they had celiac disease.3 The results are also important for physicians, to reassure patients with celiac disease under their care.

Although it is unclear whether the results from this pediatric survey1 can be generalized to other countries affected in a variety of different ways (eg, time, government response, socioeconomic status), by the pandemic, the data provide a key starting point for future studies. More importantly, both studies1 , 2 followed a cross-sectional design in patients that had already developed celiac disease, and it will be therefore important in the future to investigate postinfective consequences in the general population or in patients at risk of developing celiac disease.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest This author discloses the following: M. Ines Pinto-Sanchez received in kind support from Nestle Canada; and consultant honoraria from Takeda, Baxter, and Frezenius Kabi unrelated to this manuscript. The other author discloses no conflicts.

Funding M. Ines Pinto-Sanchez received a Division of Gastroenterology AFP grant, and a Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute Award. Elena F. Verdu is funded by a CIHR grant 168840 and holds Canada Research Chair.

References


Articles from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES