Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;10(12):1634. doi: 10.3390/biom10121634

Table 1.

Performance evaluation for CysLT1R and CysLT2R crystal structures and LiBERO-optimized models.

Number of Water Molecules ROC NSA Score Average Best Score
CyLT1, crystal structure 0 80 60 −37 −41
CyLT1, LiBERO structure 1 86 74 −46 −52
CyLT2, crystal structure 1 87 77 −34 −37
CyLT2, LiBERO structure 1 89 82 −39 −43
4D screening model (combined) as above 90 82 −45 −50