Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2020 Dec;24(70):1–144. doi: 10.3310/hta24700

Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCT.

Suzanne Hagen, Carol Bugge, Sarah G Dean, Andrew Elders, Jean Hay-Smith, Mary Kilonzo, Doreen McClurg, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Wael Agur, Federico Andreis, Joanne Booth, Maria Dimitrova, Nicola Gillespie, Cathryn Glazener, Aileen Grant, Karen L Guerrero, Lorna Henderson, Marija Kovandzic, Alison McDonald, John Norrie, Nicole Sergenson, Susan Stratton, Anne Taylor, Louise R Williams
PMCID: PMC7768330  PMID: 33289476

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence affects one in three women worldwide. Pelvic floor muscle training is an effective treatment. Electromyography biofeedback (providing visual or auditory feedback of internal muscle movement) is an adjunct that may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training (biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training) compared with basic pelvic floor muscle training for treating female stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence.

DESIGN

A multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training compared with basic pelvic floor muscle training, with a mixed-methods process evaluation and a longitudinal qualitative case study. Group allocation was by web-based application, with minimisation by urinary incontinence type, centre, age and baseline urinary incontinence severity. Participants, therapy providers and researchers were not blinded to group allocation. Six-month pelvic floor muscle assessments were conducted by a blinded assessor.

SETTING

This trial was set in UK community and outpatient care settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged ≥ 18 years, with new stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence. The following women were excluded: those with urgency urinary incontinence alone, those who had received formal instruction in pelvic floor muscle training in the previous year, those unable to contract their pelvic floor muscles, those pregnant or < 6 months postnatal, those with prolapse greater than stage II, those currently having treatment for pelvic cancer, those with cognitive impairment affecting capacity to give informed consent, those with neurological disease, those with a known nickel allergy or sensitivity and those currently participating in other research relating to their urinary incontinence.

INTERVENTIONS

Both groups were offered six appointments over 16 weeks to receive biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training or basic pelvic floor muscle training. Home biofeedback units were provided to the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group. Behaviour change techniques were built in to both interventions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was urinary incontinence severity at 24 months (measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form score, range 0-21, with a higher score indicating greater severity). The secondary outcomes were urinary incontinence cure/improvement, other urinary and pelvic floor symptoms, urinary incontinence-specific quality of life, self-efficacy for pelvic floor muscle training, global impression of improvement in urinary incontinence, adherence to the exercise, uptake of other urinary incontinence treatment and pelvic floor muscle function. The primary health economic outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life-year gained at 24 months.

RESULTS

A total of 300 participants were randomised per group. The primary analysis included 225 and 235 participants (biofeedback and basic pelvic floor muscle training, respectively). The mean 24-month International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form score was 8.2 (standard deviation 5.1) for biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training and 8.5 (standard deviation 4.9) for basic pelvic floor muscle training (adjusted mean difference -0.09, 95% confidence interval -0.92 to 0.75; p = 0.84). A total of 48 participants had a non-serious adverse event (34 in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and 14 in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group), of whom 23 (21 in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and 2 in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group) had an event related/possibly related to the interventions. In addition, there were eight serious adverse events (six in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group and two in the basic pelvic floor muscle training group), all unrelated to the interventions. At 24 months, biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training was not significantly more expensive than basic pelvic floor muscle training, but neither was it associated with significantly more quality-adjusted life-years. The probability that biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training would be cost-effective was 48% at a £20,000 willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year threshold. The process evaluation confirmed that the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group received an intensified intervention and both groups received basic pelvic floor muscle training core components. Women were positive about both interventions, adherence to both interventions was similar and both interventions were facilitated by desire to improve their urinary incontinence and hindered by lack of time.

LIMITATIONS

Women unable to contract their muscles were excluded, as biofeedback is recommended for these women.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of a difference between biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training and basic pelvic floor muscle training.

FUTURE WORK

Research should investigate other ways to intensify pelvic floor muscle training to improve continence outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trial ISRCTN57746448.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 70. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Plain language summary

Urinary incontinence (accidental leakage of urine) is a common and embarrassing problem for women. Pregnancy and childbirth may contribute by leading to less muscle support and bladder control. Pelvic floor exercises and ‘biofeedback’ equipment (a device that lets women see the muscles working as they exercise) are often used in treatment. There is good evidence that exercises (for the pelvic floor) can help, but less evidence about whether or not adding biofeedback provides better results. This trial compared pelvic floor exercises alone with pelvic floor exercises plus biofeedback. Six hundred women with urinary incontinence participated. Three hundred women were randomly assigned to the exercise group and 300 women were randomised to the exercise plus biofeedback group. Each woman had an equal chance of being in either group. Women were offered six appointments with a therapist over 16 weeks to receive their allocated treatment. After 2 years, there was no difference between the groups in the severity of women’s urinary incontinence. Women in both groups varied in how much exercise they managed to do. Some managed to exercise consistently over the 2 years and others less so. There were many factors (other than the treatment received) that affected a woman’s ability to exercise. Notably, women viewed the therapists’ input very positively. The therapists reported some problems fitting biofeedback into the appointments, but, overall, they delivered both treatments as intended. Women carried out exercises at home and many in the biofeedback pelvic floor muscle training group also used biofeedback at home; however, for both groups, time issues, forgetting and other health problems affected their adherence. There were no serious complications related to either treatment. Overall, exercise plus biofeedback was not significantly more expensive than exercise alone and the quality of life associated with exercise plus biofeedback was not better than the quality of life for exercise alone. In summary, exercises plus biofeedback was no better than exercise alone. The findings do not support using biofeedback routinely as part of pelvic floor exercise treatment for women with urinary incontinence.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Urinary Incontinence: The Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women. London: NICE; 2013.
  2. Earnshaw J, Lewis G. NICE Guide to the methods of technology appraisal: pharmaceutical industry perspective. PharmacoEconomics 2008;26:725–7. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826090-00002 doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:221–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23107 doi: 10.1002/nau.23107. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10052 doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Siroky MB. Electromyography of the perineal floor. Urol Clin North Am 1996;23:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70312-8 doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70312-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Lucca JA, Recchiuti SJ. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback on an isometric strengthening program. Phys Ther 1983;63:200–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/63.2.200 doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.2.200. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJ, Herbison GP, Roovers JP, Heineman MJ. Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD009252. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009252 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013;46:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Alewijnse D, Mesters I, Metsemakers J, Adriaans J, van den Borne B. Predictors of intention to adhere to physiotherapy among women with urinary incontinence. Health Educ Res 2001;16:173–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.2.173 doi: 10.1093/her/16.2.173. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Chen SY, Tzeng YL. Path analysis for adherence to pelvic floor muscle exercise among women with urinary incontinence. J Nurs Res 2009;17:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0b013e3181a53e7e doi: 10.1097/JNR.0b013e3181a53e7e. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Alewijnse D, Metsemakers JF, Mesters IE, van den Borne B. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle exercise therapy supplemented with a health education program to promote long-term adherence among women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:284–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10122 doi: 10.1002/nau.10122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Bø K. Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1125-0 doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1125-0. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Imamura M, Abrams P, Bain C, Buckley B, Cardozo L, Cody J, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 2010;14(40). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14400 doi: 10.3310/hta14400. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Kastelein AW, Dicker MFA, Opmeer BC, Angles SS, Raatikainen KE, Alonso JF, et al. Innovative treatment modalities for urinary incontinence: a European survey identifying experience and attitude of healthcare providers. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1725–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3339-y doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3339-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Goode PS, Markland AD, Kenton K, Balasubramanyam A, Stoddard AM, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Adherence to behavioral interventions for urge incontinence when combined with drug therapy: adherence rates, barriers, and predictors. Phys Ther 2010;90:1493–505. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080387 doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Fisher WA, Fisher JD. Understanding and promoting AIDS preventive behaviour: a conceptual model and educational tools. Can J Hum Sex 1992;1:99–106.
  18. Hay-Smith J, Dean S, Burgio K, McClurg D, Frawley H, Dumoulin C. Pelvic-floor-muscle-training adherence ‘modifiers’: a review of primary qualitative studies-2011 ICS State-of-the-Science Seminar research paper III of IV. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:622–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22771 doi: 10.1002/nau.22771. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, Dickson S, Barry S, Elders A, et al. Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014;383:796–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61977-7 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61977-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Hagen S, McClurg D, Bugge C, Hay-Smith J, Dean SG, Elders A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL randomised trial. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024153. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024153 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Grant A, Dean S, Hay-Smith J, Hagen S, McClurg D, Taylor A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL (optimising pelvic floor exercises to achieve long-term benefits) trial mixed methods longitudinal qualitative case study and process evaluation. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024152. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024152 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1334–59. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Laycock J, Jerwood D. Pelvic floor muscle assessment: the PERFECT scheme. Physiotherapy 2001;87:631–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61108-X doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61108-X. [DOI]
  24. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bø K, Corcos J, Fowler C, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2005;24:374–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20144 doi: 10.1002/nau.20144. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A pelvic muscle precontraction can reduce cough-related urine loss in selected women with mild SUI. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:870–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02721.x doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02721.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:322–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20041 doi: 10.1002/nau.20041. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn 2009;28:411–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20674 doi: 10.1002/nau.20674. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Nyström E, Sjöström M, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E. ICIQ symptom and quality of life instruments measure clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:747–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22657 doi: 10.1002/nau.22657. [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98–101. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.379 doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Brookes ST, Donovan JL, Wright M, Jackson S, Abrams P. A scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.027 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1374–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11006.x doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11006.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  32. EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score. BJOG 2009;116:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Chen SY. The development and testing of the pelvic floor muscle exercise self-efficacy scale. J Nurs Res 2004;12:257–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000387510.52243.c8 doi: 10.1097/01.JNR.0000387510.52243.c8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Hajebrahimi S, Corcos J, Lemieux MC. International consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form: comparison of physician versus patient completion and immediate and delayed self-administration. Urology 2004;63:1076–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Sherburn M, Bird M, Carey M, Bø K, Galea MP. Incontinence improves in older women after intensive pelvic floor muscle training: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:317–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20968 doi: 10.1002/nau.20968. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Sherburn M, Bø K, Galea M. Evaluation of outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence in older women. Neurourol Urodyn 2009;28:715–16.
  38. Hagen S, Elders A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Bugge C, Dean S, et al. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020;371:m3719. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3719 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  39. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The Guidelines Manual. Process and Methods. 2012. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/resources/the-guidelines-manual-pdf-2007970804933 (accessed 10 June 2018).
  40. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2017. 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02/65559 (accessed 20 July 2018). doi: 10.22024/UniKent/01.02/65559. [DOI]
  41. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. URL: www.medicinescomplete.com (accessed 20 July 2018).
  42. NHS Improvement. Reference Costs 2016/17. URL: https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/reference-costs/#rc1718 (accessed 3 April 2018).
  43. Bupa. Bupa Pay as You Go Healthcare. URL: www.bupa.co.uk/health/payg (accessed 3 May 2018).
  44. Department for Transport. WebTAG: TAG Data Book, May 2018. Transport Modelling and Appraisal. London: Department for Transport; 2018.
  45. HM Revenue and Customs. Expenses and Benefits: Business Travel Mileage for Employees’ Own Vehicles. 2018. URL: www.gov.uk/expenses-and-benefits-business-travel-mileage/rules-for-tax (accessed 12 September 2018).
  46. Office for National Statistics. Earning and Hours Worked, All Employees: ASHE Table 1. 2018. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/datasets/allemployeesashetable1 (accessed 25 October 2018).
  47. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  48. Brazier J, Czoski-Murray C, Roberts J, Brown M, Symonds T, Kelleher C. Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition-specific measure: the King’s Health Questionnaire. Med Decis Making 2008;28:113–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07301820 doi: 10.1177/0272989X07301820. [DOI] [PubMed]
  49. Glick H, Doshi J, Sonnad S, Polsky D. Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. 1st edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685028.003.0001 doi: 10.1093/med/9780199685028.003.0001. [DOI]
  50. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  51. Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 2000;19:3219–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23%3C3219::AID-SIM623%3E3.0.CO;2-P doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23%3C3219::AID-SIM623%3E3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed]
  52. Leurent B, Gomes M, Faria R, Morris S, Grieve R, Carpenter JR. Sensitivity analysis for not-at-random missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: a tutorial. PharmacoEconomics 2018;36:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0650-5 doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0650-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  53. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  54. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed]
  55. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how ‘out of control’ can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 2004;328:1561–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  56. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Qualitative Research Practice, A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
  57. Hyland G, Hay-Smith J, Treharne G. Women’s experiences of doing long-term pelvic floor muscle exercises for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:265–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2202-z doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2202-z. [DOI] [PubMed]
  58. Loohuis AMM, Wessels NJ, Jellema P, Vermeulen KM, Slieker-Ten Hove MC, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, et al. The impact of a mobile application-based treatment for urinary incontinence in adult women: design of a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting. Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37:2167–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23507 doi: 10.1002/nau.23507. [DOI] [PubMed]
  59. Hespen van A, Heitner AP, Rock HM. Incondition: Development and Process Evaluation of a Training Programme To Prevent or Reduce Urinary Incontinence in Older Women in Homes for the Elderly. International Continence Society (ICS/UGA), 34th Annual Meeting, 23–27 August 2004, Paris, France, abstract number 427.
  60. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Bickman L, Rog DJ, editors. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage; 2009. p. 219.
  61. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
  62. Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2nd edn. London: Sage; 2000.
  63. Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials 2013;14:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-15 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  64. Kovandžić M, Chew-Graham C, Reeve J, Edwards S, Peters S, Edge D, et al. Access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups: from ‘silent suffering’ to ‘making it work’. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:763–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.027 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed]
  65. Stake RE. Case Studies. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994. pp. 236–48.
  66. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicolls C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
  67. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 2012;13:95 https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-95 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  68. Hay-Smith EJC, Dean SG. Overcoming inertia: narratives from women embarking on conservative management of urinary incontinence. Aust New Zeal Cont J 2012;18:121.
  69. Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Frawley H, McClurg D, Alewijnse D, Bo K, et al. 2014 consensus statement on improving pelvic floor muscle training adherence: International Continence Society 2011 State-of-the-Science Seminar. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:600–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22796 doi: 10.1002/nau.22796. [DOI] [PubMed]
  70. Hay-Smith EJ, Herderschee R, Dumoulin C, Herbison GP. Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:CD009508. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009508 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009508. [DOI] [PubMed]
  71. McClurg D, Frawley H, Hay-Smith J, Dean S, Chen SY, Chiarelli P, et al. Scoping review of adherence promotion theories in pelvic floor muscle training – 2011 ICS state-of-the-science seminar research paper i of iv. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:606–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22769 doi: 10.1002/nau.22769. [DOI] [PubMed]
  72. Bradway C. Women’s narratives of long-term urinary incontinence. Urol Nurs 2005;25:337–44. [PubMed]
  73. Delarmelindo Rde C, Parada CM, Rodrigues RA, Bocchi SC. Between suffering and hope: rehabilitation from urinary incontinence as an intervening component. Cien Saude Colet 2013;18:1981–91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000700013 doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232013000700013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  74. Hamid TA, Pakgohar M, Ibrahim R, Dastjerdi MV. ‘Stain in life’: The meaning of urinary incontinence in the context of Muslim postmenopausal women through hermeneutic phenomenology. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2015;60:514–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  75. Bate P. Perspectives on Context. 2014. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/39a5/4ed4d7e2e6a90ee24db6522c475d7a05af7d.pdf?_ga=2.106199168.2079529133.1544714634-2078294441.1544714634 (accessed 6 December 2018).
  76. Pfadenhauer L, Rohwer A, Burns J, Booth A, Lysdahl KB, Hofmann B, et al. Guidance for the Assessment of Context and Implementation in Health Technology Assessments (HTA) and Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions: The Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework. URL: www.integrate-hta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Guidance-for-the-Assessment-of-Context-and-Implementation-in-HTA-and-Systematic-Reviews-of-Complex-Interventions-The-Co.pdf (accessed 6 December 2018).
  77. Hay-Smith EJC, Ryan K, Dean S. The silent, private exercise: experiences of pelvic floor muscle training in a sample of women with stress urinary incontinence. Physiotherapy 2007;93:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2006.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2006.10.005. [DOI]
  78. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341:c4587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4587. [DOI] [PubMed]
  79. Williams KS, Assassa RP, Gillies CL, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Shaw C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of pelvic floor therapies for urodynamic stress and mixed incontinence. BJU Int 2006;98:1043–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06484.x doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06484.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  80. Ibrahim IK, Hameed MMA, Taher EM, Shaheen EM, Elsawy MSAG. Efficacy of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training in females with pelvic floor dysfunction. Alexandria J Med 2015;51:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2014.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.06.001. [DOI]
  81. Ahadi T, Taghvadoost N, Aminimoghaddam S, Forogh B, Bazazbehbahani R, Raissi GR. Efficacy of biofeedback on quality of life in stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;215:241–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.023 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  82. Liu L, Zhang Y, Gong J, Chen X, Wu H, Zhu W. Effects of different treatment methods on the clinical and urodynamic state of perimenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence. Iran J Public Health 2018;47:1090–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  83. Terlikowski R, Dobrzycka B, Kinalski M, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Terlikowski SJ. Transvaginal electrical stimulation with surface-EMG biofeedback in managing stress urinary incontinence in women of premenopausal age: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1631–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2071-5 doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2071-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  84. Hirakawa T, Suzuki S, Kato K, Gotoh M, Yoshikawa Y. Randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback for urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1347–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2012-8 doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2012-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  85. Fitz FF, Resende APM, Stüpp L, Costa TF, Sartori MGF, Girão MJBC, et al. Efeito da adição do biofeedback ao treinamento dos músculos do assoalho pélvico para tratamento da incontinência urinária de esforço. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obs 2012;34:505–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032012001100005 doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032012001100005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  86. Fitz FF, Stüpp L, da Costa TF, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Castro RA. Outpatient biofeedback in addition to home pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:2034–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23226 doi: 10.1002/nau.23226. [DOI] [PubMed]
  87. Bertotto A, Schvartzman R, Uchôa S, Wender MCO. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback as an add-on to pelvic floor muscle exercises on neuromuscular outcomes and quality of life in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:2142–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23258 doi: 10.1002/nau.23258. [DOI] [PubMed]
  88. Özlü A, Yıldız N, Öztekin Ö. Comparison of the efficacy of perineal and intravaginal biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:2132–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23257 doi: 10.1002/nau.23257. [DOI] [PubMed]
  89. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 6th edn. Bristol: International Incontinence Society; 2017.
  90. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women [published online ahead of print 10 04 2018]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  91. Sran M, Mercier J, Wilson P, Lieblich P, Dumoulin C. Physical therapy for urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or low bone density: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause 2016;23:286–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000594 doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000594. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES