Significance
Ground states of low-disorder, interacting, dilute electron systems are of fundamental interest in understanding electron–electron interaction phenomena. Our experimental data on a clean two-dimensional electron system reveal a sequence of transitions as the density is lowered. Starting from high densities, we observe a transition from a metallic state to an exotic insulating phase that is stabilized by disorder and interaction. As we further lower the density, we observe signs of a spontaneous transition to a ferromagnetic ground state and then to a strongly insulating state whose characteristics suggest that it is a pinned solid phase, possibly a (ferromagnetic) Wigner solid. We also find that the onset of ferromagnetism can be controlled by tuning the electrons’ valley degree of freedom.
Keywords: 2D electron system, ferromagnetism, magnetotransport, metal–insulator transition, Wigner solid
Abstract
What are the ground states of an interacting, low-density electron system? In the absence of disorder, it has long been expected that as the electron density is lowered, the exchange energy gained by aligning the electron spins should exceed the enhancement in the kinetic (Fermi) energy, leading to a (Bloch) ferromagnetic transition. At even lower densities, another transition to a (Wigner) solid, an ordered array of electrons, should occur. Experimental access to these regimes, however, has been limited because of the absence of a material platform that supports an electron system with very high quality (low disorder) and low density simultaneously. Here we explore the ground states of interacting electrons in an exceptionally clean, two-dimensional electron system confined to a modulation-doped AlAs quantum well. The large electron effective mass in this system allows us to reach very large values of the interaction parameter , defined as the ratio of the Coulomb to Fermi energies. As we lower the electron density via gate bias, we find a sequence of phases, qualitatively consistent with the above scenario: a paramagnetic phase at large densities, a spontaneous transition to a ferromagnetic state when surpasses 35, and then a phase with strongly nonlinear current-voltage characteristics, suggestive of a pinned Wigner solid, when exceeds . However, our sample makes a transition to an insulating state at , preceding the onset of the spontaneous ferromagnetism, implying that besides interaction, the role of disorder must also be taken into account in understanding the different phases of a realistic dilute electron system.
The ground state of an interacting, dilute electron system and its magnetic properties have long been topics of great interest in many-body physics (1–7). At low densities the interaction energy dominates over the kinetic energy. A disorder-free, itinerant electron system at sufficiently low electron densities is expected to make a transition to a ferromagnetic ground state (1), namely, a Bloch ferromagnet. At even lower densities, electrons are predicted to condense into a Wigner solid, an ordered array of electrons (2). For a quantitative description, it is convenient to characterize the interacting electron system with the dimensionless parameter , the average interelectron distance in units of the effective Bohr radius (equivalently, is also the ratio of the Coulomb to Fermi energies). In a three-dimensional (3D) metal, values are typically well below those required for the ferromagnetic transition (4). For a 2D electron system (2DES), Monte Carlo calculations (6) predict a transition to full magnetization when exceeds 26, followed by another transition to a Wigner crystal state for . (These predictions are not all corroborated by other Monte Carlo calculations; see, e.g., ref. 7.) Achieving a very dilute and clean 2DES so that interaction phenomena are not hindered by disorder and single-particle localization, however, is extremely challenging. For a 2DES, we have , where is the electron band effective mass (in units of the free electron mass), is the dielectric constant, and is the 2DES density. For example, in a GaAs 2DES ( and ), corresponds to a density of , which is indeed very difficult to attain (8, 9). In GaAs 2D hole systems (), large values can be reached more easily, and in fact, hints of a Wigner solid formation near were reported (10). However, partly because of the strong spin–orbit interaction, the extraction of spin polarization of 2D holes is not straightforward (11–13).
There are other semiconductor 2DESs with large , e.g., at a Si/ or MgZnO/ZnO interface or in AlAs quantum wells, where large values can be reached (14–23). Indeed, the spin polarization of interacting 2DESs became a subject of intense interest and controversy in the context of the enigmatic metal–insulator transition (MIT) in dilute 2D carrier systems. Numerous experiments revealed that the spin/valley polarization in 2D carrier systems plays a role in the temperature dependence of conductivity (9, 11–22). In Si/ 2DESs, there were also claims that the spin susceptibility diverges at and that the divergence coincides with the MIT (15, 16). However, these conclusions were not corroborated in measurements on a nearly ideal (single-valley, isotropic, very thin) 2DES confined to a narrow (4.5-nm-wide) AlAs quantum well (17). The AlAs data showed that the spin susceptibility does not diverge up to the highest experimentally achieved (). Instead, it closely follows the Monte Carlo calculations’ results (6) and remains finite as the 2DES goes through the MIT at (17). In very recent studies which revisited the MIT problem in Si/ 2DESs (21, 22), it was also concluded that there is no divergence of the spin susceptibility, even at densities lower than those reached in refs. 15, 16. Therefore, there has been no experimental evidence for a transition to full spin polarization in a 2DES at zero magnetic field prior to this work.
Experimental Results
We report here the observation of a spontaneous transition to a fully magnetized ground state and experimentally construct a comprehensive ground-state phase diagram for the interacting 2DES as a function of electron density (and ), as summarized in Fig. 1A. Our material platform is a very low disorder, dilute 2DES confined to a modulation-doped, 21-nm-wide AlAs quantum well () (24). The 2D electrons in our sample occupy two in-plane conduction-band valleys with longitudinal and transverse effective masses and , leading to an effective in-plane band mass equal to (25). We refer to these valleys, whose electron occupancy we can control via the application of in-plane, uniaxial strain, by the direction of their major axis in the plane, [100] and [010] (SI Appendix, section I). The large effective mass, combined with the exceptionally high purity of the samples, allows us to achieve very large values of while maintaining a strongly interacting system. This is evinced by our observation of signatures of fractional quantum Hall states in a perpendicular magnetic field a at density as low as () (see, e.g., Fig. 2 for data at and relevant discussion); throughout the manuscript, we give the 2DES densities in units of .
Signatures of Spontaneous Ferromagnetism.
First, we present data for the case where all of the electrons are transferred to the [010] valley, i.e., the valley whose longer Fermi wave vector axis is along the [010] direction (Fig. 1B, Bottom, Inset) (for more details, see SI Appendix, section I). We probe the spin polarization via measuring the 2DES resistance as a function of a magnetic field applied parallel to the sample plane (Fig. 1B). This is a well-established technique (9, 12–22, 26, 27) whose working principle, as depicted in Fig. 1B, is that the resistance of the 2DES increases as polarizes the electrons through the addition of Zeeman energy (). The partially polarized 2DES has higher resistance because of a reduction in the screening of the disorder potential by the 2D electrons (26, 27). When reaches a sufficiently large value () so that equals the Fermi energy (), the 2D electrons become fully magnetized, and the resistance no longer rises. Since and , we have
[1] |
where is the band value of the effective Landé g factor and is the Bohr magneton ( in our AlAs 2DES). Note that is inversely proportional to the product which is directly related to the spin susceptibility, . In an interacting 2DES, , , and are typically enhanced by interaction. Denoting the enhanced values by , , and , one can determine the enhancement factor for the susceptibility from measuring . In our experiments, we find that as we lower the 2DES density, decreases rapidly, signaling a fast-enhancing , and then suddenly vanishes below a critical density (Fig. 1 C–E). This observation strongly suggests that the 2DES is fully magnetized for in the absence of an applied magnetic field.
Fig. 1 C–E capture the evolution described above. In Fig. 1C we show vs. applied along the [100] direction (Fig. 1B, Inset). For , rises with and saturates above a density-dependent field , marked by vertical arrows in Fig. 1C. As discussed above (Fig. 1B), signals the full magnetization of the 2DES and allows us to deduce the spin susceptibility. In Fig. 1 D and E we show plots of the measured and the deduced susceptibility as a function of . As expected for a dilute, interacting 2DES, when is lowered, decreases quickly as susceptibility increases (6, 17). The principal finding in our experiments is that as is lowered below 2.10, the traces in Fig. 1C become completely independent of with no sign of a whatsoever. A most logical interpretation of this behavior is that for , the 2DES is fully magnetized at , expected for spontaneous ferromagnetism. The critical density corresponds to .
It is noteworthy in Fig. 1C that the trace taken at a slightly larger density, , exhibits a pronounced hysteresis near . In Fig. 2 A and B we show and (Hall resistance) traces taken as a function of perpendicular magnetic field, . Hysteretic features near zero magnetic field are clearly visible here too and are most pronounced when is close to . These features suggest a possible formation of magnetic domains, as expected near a magnetic transition. Notably, as seen in Fig. 2C, the hysteresis vanishes at high temperatures; e.g., at , the hysteresis disappears at K.
We note that the technique we use to probe the enhancement and divergence of the spin susceptibility is similar to what was used in many previous studies of the spin polarization of dilute 2D carriers (9, 12–22, 26, 27). None of the previous studies, however, reported a sudden and complete disappearance of the magnetoresistance as a function of (implying a vanishing and full magnetization) as the 2DES density is reduced below a critical value. In some of these studies, e.g., in the work of ref. 16 on Si, nonzero magnetoresistance was observed down to the lowest achievable densities, and a plot of (deduced from fitting the magnetoresistance to an empirical expression) vs. was extrapolated to lower densities to conclude that vanishes at a finite density (corresponding to an ). As shown in ref. 17, such extrapolation can be misleading, and recent new measurements (21, 22) indeed conclude that there is no magnetic instability or complete spin polarization at zero magnetic field in the Si system even at densities lower than those achieved in ref. 16 (see, e.g., point 7 on p. 10 of ref. 21).
We believe it is the exceptionally high sample quality that allows us to explore the interaction phenomena even in the extremely dilute case and observe a spontaneous magnetization. The high quality of our 2DES can be inferred from Fig. 2 A and B traces. At Landau level filling factor and (), we observe clear indications of integer and fractional quantum Hall states, signaled by resistance minima in minima and reasonably well-quantized plateaus in even at (). (We observe minima at and down to [].) The observation of fractional quantum Hall states down to such small densities is particularly noteworthy as it attests to the presence of interaction even when the 2DES is extremely dilute.
We would like to highlight two points before closing this section. First, note that Eq. 1 assumes that (i.e., the spin susceptibility, ) is a constant, independent of . This assumption is consistent with the conclusions of previous studies (17). While our determination of relies on this assumption, we emphasize that our main conclusion, namely, that the 2DES undergoes a spontaneous spin polarization below a critical density, is based on the vanishing of and does not depend on such an assumption. Second, as shown in SI Appendix, section IV, the value of (which is constant and independent of ) at is close to the saturated value of at large at . This observation confirms our conclusion that the 2DES is fully spin polarized at at , just as it is at at large .
Is There a Link between the Spontaneous Ferromagnetism and the MIT?
As mentioned in the opening paragraphs, a possible link between the spin polarization and MIT in dilute 2D carrier systems has been debated heavily (9, 11–22). In Fig. 3A we show the temperature dependence of the sample resistance measured at . At the highest , the behavior is metallic, with resistance decreasing with decreasing temperature, while at the lowest densities, an opposite, insulating behavior is seen. The density at which the behavior switches is (), well above , the onset of the transition to full magnetization. This is again consistent with the data of ref. 17 but disagrees with the conclusions of ref. 16. It is also noteworthy that at which we observe the MIT is much larger than reported in other 2D carrier systems for the MIT, except for very clean GaAs 2D hole systems (10).
We would like to emphasize that while we do not see a link between the MIT and the full magnetization of the 2DES (as inferred from the sudden disappearance of in Fig. 1C data), we do observe certain anomalies in the magnetoresistance traces near . As seen in Fig. 1C, at , just above the MIT, the resistance shows a very rapid rise as a function of at very low fields, followed by an unusual linear rise with at higher fields before saturation. This behavior is not unique to this trace and can be seen in a range of densities between and , near the MIT (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Another noteworthy feature is a change in the slope of vs. plot in Fig. 1D at : it appears that the drop with lowering the density accelerates below . A qualitatively similar feature was reported recently for Si/ 2DESs (22). We will return to these anomalous features in our interpretation of the data in Interpretation of the Ferromagnetic Transition.
Hints of Wigner Solid.
In Fig. 3B, we address another fundamental property of our 2DES at very low densities. Fig. 3B displays differential resistance () as a function of applied DC current ; see SI Appendix, sections V–VII, for measurement details and additional data. At densities , is linear. As the density is lowered below , - slowly becomes nonlinear, and at the lowest densities, it is strongly nonlinear. As demonstrated in SI Appendix, Fig. S11, this nonlinearity is a strong function of temperature and vanishes at high temperatures. Previous studies on extremely dilute 2D carrier systems at (10), or at very small Landau level fillings (28), have concluded that the nonlinear - suggests the depinning of a Wigner solid which is pinned by the ubiquitous disorder potential. This conclusion has been corroborated by numerous experimental studies, including microwave resonance and other measurements (29–32). It is possible that in our 2DES, too, the nonlinear - signals the formation of a pinned Wigner solid at ().
An intriguing observation in our experiments is that the fractional quantum Hall states still show up in a density regime where the longitudinal resistance at is extremely large and the 2DES exhibits a strongly insulating temperature dependence. The resistance is also extremely large at , but remarkably, its value at decreases as we lower the temperature, as expected for a fractional quantum Hall liquid state. The notion that a pinned Wigner solid at would make a transition to a correlated liquid state in a perpendicular field might sound counterintuitive but in fact is consistent with conclusions implied by the theoretical work of Zhao et al. (33).
Phase Diagram for an Interacting 2D Electron System.
The observations of MIT, spontaneous magnetization, and nonlinear - response as a function of (or ) lead us to suggest an experimental phase diagram for the ground states of our interacting 2DES, as highlighted in Fig. 1A. The ground states include four distinct phases as a function of decreasing (i.e., increasing ), as schematically represented in Fig. 3C: 1) paramagnetic metal, 2) paramagnetic insulator, 3) ferromagnetic insulator, and 4) ferromagnetic Wigner solid.
Interpretation of the Ferromagnetic Transition.
A simple but possibly naïve interpretation of the observed ferromagnetic transition we observe is that it is a Bloch transition (1). As alluded to in the Introduction, in 1929, Felix Bloch suggested that itinerant electrons should spontaneously magnetize at sufficiently low densities. Our observation of the spontaneous ferromagnetism is highly reminiscent of such a phenomenon. A transition at lower densities to a state that we identify as a Wigner solid would also make qualitative sense in this simple picture. Such a picture is also qualitatively consistent with the Monte Carlo calculations of ref. 6 which were done for a disorder-free 2DES, although there are quantitative discrepancies. For example, the value of () at which we observe the ferromagnetic transition is larger than the value () predicted by ref. 6. So is the value of () above which we see signs of a possible Wigner solid formation (ref. 6 predicts ). These quantitative discrepancies might come from the fact that the calculations are performed for an ideal 2DES, with no disorder, zero electron layer thickness, and an isotropic effective mass. In our 2DES, on the other hand, the electrons have a nonzero layer thickness and occupy a valley with an anisotropic effective mass. Both the finite electron layer thickness and the mass anisotropy are known to reduce the interaction strength and the enhancement of the spin susceptibility at a given (34) and can move the onset of full magnetization to larger .
However, there is an important caveat. As clean as our sample might be, there is some finite disorder because of the presence of ionized impurities. The disorder is indeed the likely cause for the 2DES exhibiting an insulating behavior below . On the other hand, our observation of a spontaneous ferromagnetism and the fractional quantum Hall features that we observe at and even lower densities (Fig. 2) provide strong evidence that interaction is playing a dominant role. An alternative interpretation of our data is then as follows. It has been shown theoretically that a direct first-order transition between a metallic Fermi liquid state and a Wigner solid is forbidden in 2D and that there should be one or more exotic microemulsion phases in an intermediate density range (20, 35). It might be that the ferromagnetic transition we observe is occurring in such a microemulsion phase. The anomalous features seen in the resistance vs. data near the MIT (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S4) could be manifestations of such exotic intermediate phases. Also, given the anisotropy of the effective mass in our system and that the resistance we measure in this phase is anisotropic (), it is possible that the intermediate phase is nematic or smectic as proposed theoretically (20, 35). Moreover, the theory of refs. 35, 36 concludes that the Wigner solid phase stabilized at the lowest densities has ferromagnetic order. This scenario is consistent with our data: we see even below where we infer a transition to a pinned Wigner solid phase in our 2DES.
Role of the Valley Degree of Freedom in the Spin Polarization.
Another important highlight of experiments is captured in Fig. 4 where we illustrate how the valley polarization impacts the ferromagnetic transition. How we tune the valley occupancy is described in SI Appendix, section I. In Fig. 4A we show a plot similar to Fig. 1C except that here the valleys are degenerate. We also show plots of the measured and the deduced spin susceptibility as a function of in Fig. 4 B and C. Qualitatively similar to Fig. 1 C–E, when is lowered, decreases rapidly as susceptibility increases. However, in the valley-degenerate case, the critical density below which vanishes is instead of of the single-valley–occupied 2DES (Fig. 1 C–E). This finding is consistent with previous measurements (at much higher densities) (37, 38) and theoretical calculations (39) which concluded that the enhancement of the spin susceptibility, at a given density, is smaller for a two-valley system compared to a single-valley one. The phenomenon can be attributed to the modification of the exchange energy in the system because of the extra (valley) degree of freedom.
The tunability of the valley occupancy allows us to investigate the ferromagnetic transition as a function of partial valley occupancy. As shown in Fig. 4 D and E, is largest when the valleys are degenerate. As we lift the degeneracy and move toward valley polarization, starts to drop and eventually attains its smallest value when the electrons are completely valley polarized. This means that the spin susceptibility is maximum when the 2DES is valley polarized and minimum when the valleys are degenerate, for a given density. Thanks to this interplay between the spin and valley degrees of freedom, we can control the onset of the ferromagnetic transition via tuning the valley occupancy, opening up exciting avenues to integrate spintronics and valleytronics in the same device.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support through the US Department of Energy Basic Energy Science (Grant DEFG02-00-ER45841) for measurements, the National Science Foundation (Grants DMR 1709076, ECCS 1906253, and MRSEC DMR 1420541), and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems Initiative (Grant GBMF9615 to L.N.P.) for sample fabrication and characterization. We also thank D. M. Ceperley, H. D. Drew, J. K. Jain, S. A. Kivelson, M. A. Mueed, and M. P. Sarachik for illuminating discussions.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
See online for related content such as Commentaries.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2018248117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
All study data are available in the main text and SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Bloch F., Bemerkung zur Elektronentheorie des Ferromagnetismus und der elektrischen Leitfähigkeit. Z. Phys. 57, 545–555 (1929). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wigner E., On the interaction of electrons in metals. Phys. Rev. 46, 1002–1011 (1934). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stoner E. C., Ferromagnetism. Rep. Prog. Phys. 11, 43–112 (1947). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ashcroft N. W., Mermin N. D., Solid State Physics, (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976), p. 682. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tanatar B., Ceperley D. M., Ground state of the two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5005–5016 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Attaccalite C., Moroni S., Gori-Giorgi P., Bachelet G. B., Correlation energy and spin polarization in the 2D electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256601 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Drummond N. D., Needs R. J., Phase diagram of the low-density two-dimensional homogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126402 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sajoto T., Suen Y. W., Engel L. W., Santos M. B., Shayegan M., Fractional quantum Hall effect in very-low-density GaAs/As heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 41, 8449–8460 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu J., Stormer H. L., Pfeiffer L. N., Baldwin K. W., West K. W., Spin susceptibility of an ultra-low-density two-dimensional electron system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 056805 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoon J., Li C. C., Shahar D., Tsui D. C., Shayegan M., Wigner crystallization and metal-insulator transition of two-dimensional holes in GaAs at .. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1744–1747 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Papadakis S. J., De Poortere E. P., Manoharan H. C., Shayegan M., Winkler R., The effect of spin splitting on the metallic behavior of a two-dimensional system. Science 283, 2056–2058 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tutuc E., De Poortere E. P., Papadakis S. J., Shayegan M., In-plane magnetic field induced spin polarization and transition to insulating behavior in two-dimensional hole systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2858–2861 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Winkler R., et al. , Anomalous spin polarization of GaAs two-dimensional hole systems. Phys. Rev. B 72, 195321 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Okamoto T., Hosoya K., Kawaji S., Yagi A., Spin degree of freedom in a two-dimensional electron liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3875–3878 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vitkalov S. A., Zheng H., Mertes K. M., Sarachik M. P., Klapwijk T. M., Scaling of the magnetoconductivity of silicon MOSFETs: Evidence for a quantum phase transition in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 086401 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shashkin A. A., Kravchenko S. V., Dolgopolov V. T., Klapwijk T. M., Indication of the ferromagnetic instability in a dilute two-dimensional electron system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 086801 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vakili K., Shkolnikov Y. P., Tutuc E., De Poortere E. P., Shayegan M., Spin susceptibility of two-dimensional electrons in narrow AlAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 226401 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gunawan O., et al. , Spin-valley phase diagram of the two-dimensional metal-insulator transition. Nat. Phys. 3, 388–391 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kravchenko S. V., Sarachik M. P., Metal-insulator transition in two-dimensional electron systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1–44 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Spivak B., Kravchenko S. V., Kivelson S. A., Gao X. P. A., Colloquium: Transport in strongly correlated two-dimensional electron fluids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1743–1766 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pudalov V. M., Kutsevich A. Y., Gershenson M. E., Burmistrov I. S., Reznikov M., Probing spin susceptibility of a correlated two-dimensional electron system by transport and magnetization measurements. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155109 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li S., Zhang Q., Ghaemi P., Sarachik M. P., Evidence for mixed phases and percolation at the metal-insulator transition in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 99, 155302 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Falson J., Kawasaki M., A review of the quantum Hall effects in MgZnO/ZnO heterostructures. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 056501 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chung Y. J., et al. , Multivalley two-dimensional electron system in an AlAs quantum well with mobility exceeding /Vs. Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 071001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shayegan M. et al., Two-dimensional electrons occupying multiple valleys in AlAs. Phys. Status Solidi 243, 3629–3642 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dolgopolov V. T., Gold A., Magnetoresistance of a two-dimensional electron gas in a parallel magnetic field. JETP Lett.. 71, 27–30 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Herbut I. F., The effect of parallel magnetic field on the Boltzmann conductivity and the Hall coefficient of a disordered two-dimensional Fermi liquid. Phys. Rev. B 63, 113102 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goldman V. J., Santos M., Shayegan M., Cunningham J. E., Evidence for two-dimensional quantum Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2189–2192 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Williams F. I. B., et al. , Conduction threshold and pinning frequency of magnetically induced wigner solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3285–3288 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen Y., et al. , Melting of a 2D quantum electron solid in high magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 2, 452–455 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tiemann L., Rhone T., Shibata N., Muraki K., NMR profiling of quantum electron solids in high magnetic fields. Nat. Phys. 10, 648–652 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Deng H. et al., Commensurability oscillations of composite fermions induced by the periodic potential of a wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 096601 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhao J., Zhang Y., Jain J. K., Crystallization in the fractional quantum Hall regime induced by Landau-level mixing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 116802 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gokmen T., et al. , Spin susceptibility of interacting two-dimensional electrons with anisotropic effective mass. Phys. Rev. B 76, 233301 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spivak B., Kivelson S. A., Phases intermediate between a two-dimensional electron liquid and Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. B 70, 155114 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chakravarty S., Kivelson S., Nayak C., Voelker K., Wigner glass, spin liquids and the metal-insulator transition. Philos. Mag. B79, 859–868 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shkolnikov Y. P., Vakili K., De Poortere E. P., Shayegan M., Dependence of spin susceptibility of a two-dimensional electron system on the valley degree of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246804 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gokmen T., Padmanabhan M., Shayegan M., Contrast between spin and valley degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. B 81, 235305 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marchi M., Palo S. D., Moroni S., Senatore G., Correlation energy and the spin susceptibility of the two-valley two-dimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 80, 035103 (2009). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are available in the main text and SI Appendix.